Canada
Region North AmericaIncome High incomeCapital OttawaISO3 CAN
Human development
0.939
HDI, 0–1 scale
GDP per capita
57,989.6PPP $
2021 international $
Life expectancy
82.1yrs
At birth
Governance
80.7/100
Avg. of six WGI
Governance
Control of Corruption
- Control of Corruption80.9Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- Government Effectiveness85.5Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- Political Stability & Absence of Violence76.1Ranked 64th▼ 2· 2024
- Rule of Law82.1Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Regulatory Quality76.3Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2024
- Voice & Accountability83.2Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2024
- Military spending1.3%Ranked 90th▼ 7· 2024
- Women in parliament30.3%Ranked 68th▲ 7· 2025
- V-Dem electoral democracy0.84Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- V-Dem liberal democracy0.74Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2025
- Human rights index (V-Dem)0.9Ranked 25th—· 2025
- Civil liberties index (V-Dem)0.9Ranked 25th—· 2025
- Freedom of expression index (V-Dem)0.93Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2025
- Participatory democracy index (V-Dem)0.59Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2025
- Deliberative democracy index (V-Dem)0.68Ranked 26th▼ 4· 2025
- Egalitarian democracy index (V-Dem)0.63Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2025
- Women's political empowerment index (V-Dem)0.87Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2025
- Rule of law index (V-Dem)0.96Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2025
- 8.8.2 - Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining) based on International Labour Organization (ILO) textual sources and national legislation - SL_LBR_NTLCPL0.36Ranked 126th▲ 13· 2023
- Absence of corruption Index (IDEA)84.6Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2021
- Academic freedom index0.85Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2025
- Access to justice for men1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Access to justice for women0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Access to justice Index (IDEA)80.3Ranked 21st▼ 9· 2021
- Accountability index1.5Ranked 26th—· 2025
- African Development Bank3.9%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Age of electoral democracy106Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Age of electoral democracy105Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Age of full democracy80Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Annual change in Checks on Government Index (IDEA)1.5Ranked 26th▼ 121· 2021
- Annual change in civil society Participation Index (IDEA)-1.6Ranked 46th▲ 13· 2021
- Annual change in democracy index (EIU)0.2Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2020
- Annual change in Direct democracy Index (IDEA)-0.03Ranked 64th▲ 13· 2021
- Annual change in Electoral Participation Index (IDEA)-7Ranked 29th▲ 10· 2021
- Annual change in Fundamental Rights Index (IDEA)1.7Ranked 20th▼ 122· 2021
- Annual change in Impartial Administration Index (IDEA)-0.02Ranked 79th▼ 58· 2021
- Annual change in Local Democracy Index (IDEA)0Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2021
- Annual change in Representative Government Index (IDEA)0.72Ranked 26th▼ 61· 2021
- Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force)0.35Ranked 139th▲ 2· 2020
- Armed forces personnel, total72,000Ranked 57th—· 2020
- Arms exports (SIPRI trend indicator values)152MRanked 18th▲ 3· 2024
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values)149MRanked 38th▼ 8· 2024
- Associational and organizational rights (E)12Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Birth register implemented1Ranked 1st—· 2015
- Bribery incidence (% of firms experiencing at least one bribe payment request)5.8Ranked 23rd· 2024
- BTI0.67Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Central estimate0.92Ranked 62nd▲ 8· 2010
- Checks on Government Index (IDEA)75.3Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2021
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Citizen satisfaction with democracy0.93Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2020
- Citizen support for democracy0.85Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2020
- Civil liberties aggregate score58Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Civil liberties index0.9Ranked 25th—· 2025
- Civil Liberties index (FH)1Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Civil liberties Index (IDEA)87.1Ranked 9th—· 2021
- Civil liberties rating1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Civil liberties rating (1-7)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Civil liberties score58Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Civil society participation index0.94Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2025
- Civil society participation Index (IDEA)72.7Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2021
- Clean elections index0.94Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2025
- Clean Elections Index (IDEA)88.8Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2021
- Clientelism Index0.06Ranked 146th▼ 5· 2025
- Common good justifications1.5Ranked 36th—· 2025
- Competitive elections1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Competitiveness of executive recruitment3Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Competitiveness of political participation5Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Completeness of birth registration (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Completeness of cause-of-death data (%)100%Ranked 11th· 2015
- Constraints on the executive7Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)1.6Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)80.9Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- Core civil society index0.88Ranked 36th▼ 5· 2025
- Core civil society index0.88Ranked 36th▼ 5· 2025
- Corruption Perception Index, CPI76Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)75Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Corruption Perceptions Index rank12Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Corruption Perceptions Index score76Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Countries that adopt and implement constitutional, statutory and/or policy guarantees for public access to information1Ranked 1st· 2024
- Countries that adopt and implement constitutional, statutory and/or policy guarantees for public access to information1Ranked 1st· 2025
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing-House (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2024
- Countries with at least one verified case of killings of human rights defenders, journalists, and trade unionists (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant)2Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant)2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Country is a full democracy1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- CPI number of sources8Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)4Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Deliberative democracy index0.68Ranked 26th▼ 4· 2025
- Deliberative political institutions index0.79Ranked 47th▼ 11· 2025
- Democracy10Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Democracy age131Ranked 5th—· 2018
- Democracy Index20Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Democracy index (EIU)92.4Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2020
- Democratic electoral institutions12Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Detected victims of human trafficking, by age and sex (number)452Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2023
- Detected victims of human trafficking, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)1.2Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2023
- Detected victims of human trafficking for forced labour, servitude and slavery, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 48th—· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for forced labour, servitude and slavery, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for other purposes, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2022
- Detected victims of human trafficking for other purposes, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2022
- Detected victims of human trafficking for removal of organ, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for removal of organ, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for sexual exploitation, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 61st▲ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for sexual exploitation, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 62nd▲ 4· 2020
- Diagonal accountability index1.4Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2025
- Direct Democracy Index0.02Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2025
- Direct Democracy Index (IDEA)1.9Ranked 106th▼ 5· 2021
- Domestic policymaking free from foreign influence1.7Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2025
- Effective parliament Index (IDEA)63.1Ranked 53rd▼ 12· 2021
- Egalitarian component index0.7Ranked 55th▼ 2· 2025
- Egalitarian democracy index0.63Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2025
- Egalitarian political institutions index0.7Ranked 55th▼ 2· 2025
- Elected Government Index (IDEA)100Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Elected local governments0.96Ranked 26th▼ 9· 2025
- Elected officials index1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Elected regional governments0.97Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2025
- Elections for chief executive1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Elections for chief executive and legislature1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Electoral democracy1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Electoral democracy1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Electoral democracy1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.84Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.84Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.84Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.84Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.84Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.84Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- Electoral Participation Index (IDEA)55.4Ranked 91st▲ 15· 2021
- Electoral process (A)12Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Elite consultation1Ranked 69th▼ 2· 2025
- Engaged in religious/spiritual activities29.2%Ranked 67th· 2020
- Engaged in religious/spiritual activities29.2%Ranked 67th· 2020
- Engaged in religious/spiritual activities29.2%Ranked 67th· 2020
- Engaged society1.3Ranked 55th▼ 5· 2025
- Equal access to power index0.84Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2025
- Equality before the law and individual liberty0.91Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2025
- Equality before the law and individual liberty index0.91Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2025
- Equal resource distribution index0.83Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2025
- Equal rights of inheritance for sons and daughters when no will is left1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Equal rights protection index0.46Ranked 112th▼ 4· 2025
- Executive corruption index0.03Ranked 12th▼ 7· 2025
- Executive Corruption Index0.03Ranked 146th▲ 3· 2025
- Extremely important64.4%Ranked 38th· 2020
- Extremely important64.4%Ranked 38th· 2020
- FIW A14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW A24Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW A34Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW B14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW B24Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW B34Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW B44Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW C14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW C24Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW C33Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- FIW D14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW D23Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- FIW D34Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW D44Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW E14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW E24Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW E34Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW F14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW F24Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW F34Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW F43Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- FIW G14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW G24Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW G34Ranked 1st—· 2024
- FIW G44Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Foreign policymaking free from foreign influence1.3Ranked 74th▼ 4· 2025
- Free and fair elections1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Free and fair elections index0.94Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2025
- Freedom in the World total score97Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Freedom of association and assembly Index (IDEA)83.9Ranked 5th—· 2021
- Freedom of association (thick)0.87Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2025
- Freedom of association thick index0.87Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2025
- Freedom of expression and alternative sources of information0.93Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2025
- Freedom of expression and belief (D)15Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Freedom of expression Index (IDEA)81.9Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2021
- Freedom of the Press2Ranked 1st—· 2016
- Functioning of government (C)11Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- GDP per capita45,529.6Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Government censorship of the media3Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)1.8Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100)85.5Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- GSoD: Access to Justice0.78Ranked 29th▲ 5· 2020
- GSoD: Checks on Government0.68Ranked 45th▲ 13· 2020
- GSoD: Civil Liberties0.89Ranked 10th▼ 5· 2020
- GSoD: Clean Elections0.91Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Effective Parliament0.59Ranked 64th▲ 13· 2020
- GSoD: Elected Government1Ranked 1st—· 2020
- GSoD: Free Political Parties0.73Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Fundamental Rights0.8Ranked 26th▲ 6· 2020
- GSoD: Impartial Administration0.82Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2020
- GSoD: Inclusive Suffrage0.95Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Judicial Independence0.62Ranked 49th▲ 33· 2020
- GSoD: Media Integrity0.82Ranked 25th—· 2020
- GSoD: Representative Government0.83Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2020
- GSoD: SD22A0.83Ranked 10th—· 2020
- GSoD: SD22B0.86Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2020
- GSoD: SD22C0.71Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- GSoD: SD22D0.77Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2020
- GSoD: SD22E0.78Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2020
- GSoD: SD23A0.67Ranked 29th▲ 6· 2020
- GSoD: SD23B0.82Ranked 29th—· 2020
- GSoD: SD23C0.83Ranked 17th▲ 10· 2020
- GSoD: SD410.85Ranked 12th▲ 4· 2020
- GSoD: SD420.76Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2020
- GSoD: SD510.74Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2020
- GSoD: SD520.62Ranked 69th▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: SD530.02Ranked 85th▼ 2· 2020
- GSoD: SD540.88Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Social Rights and Equality0.73Ranked 24th▲ 6· 2020
- Horizontal accountability index1.2Ranked 44th▲ 4· 2025
- Human rights index0.9Ranked 25th—· 2025
- Human rights index0.9Ranked 25th—· 2025
- Human rights index0.9Ranked 25th—· 2025
- Human Rights Protection Scores – by Christopher Farris and Keith Schnakenberg3.2Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2019
- Index of the civil liberties (EIU)94.1Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Index of the electoral process and pluralism (EIU)95.8Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Judicial constraints on the executive index0.9Ranked 26th—· 2025
- Judicial constraints on the executive index0.9Ranked 26th—· 2025
- Judicial Corruption Score3.1Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2025
- Justified political positions2.2Ranked 13th▼ 38· 2025
- Know friends or family with anxiety or depression58.3%Ranked 5th· 2020
- Learning-adjusted years of schooling11.7Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2020
- Legislative constraints on the executive index0.85Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- Legislative constraints on the executive index0.85Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- Legislative Corruption Score1.7Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2025
- Legislative elections1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- LGBT+ rights index9.2Ranked 16th—· 2019
- Liberal component index0.87Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2025
- Liberal component index0.87Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2025
- Liberal democracy index0.74Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2025
- Liberal democracy index0.74Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2025
- Liberal political institutions1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Life expectancy82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Lower/single house seats343Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2026
- Male34.8%Ranked 37th· 2020
- Male respondents53.2%Ranked 10th· 2020
- Media Corruption Score3Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Military expenditure (current LCU)40.21BRanked 82nd▲ 2· 2024
- Military expenditure (current USD)29.35BRanked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- Military expenditure (% of general government expenditure)3.1Ranked 113th▼ 5· 2024
- Multiparty elections1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Multi-party elections for government's chief executive1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Multiparty elections for legislature1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Neopatrimonialism index0.07Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2025
- Number of victims of intentional homicide, by sex (number)788Ranked 64th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population, by sex (victims per 100,000 population)2Ranked 38th▼ 6· 2024
- Openness of executive recruitment4Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Participatory component index0.64Ranked 20th▼ 7· 2025
- Participatory democracy index0.59Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2025
- Participatory political institutions0.64Ranked 20th▼ 7· 2025
- Personal autonomy and individual rights (G)16Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Physical violence index0.94Ranked 28th—· 2025
- Physical violence index0.94Ranked 28th—· 2025
- Plans fully funded1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Police reporting rate for physical assault in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)36.1Ranked 11th▲ 5· 2019
- Police reporting rate for physical violence in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)37.9Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Police reporting rate for robbery in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)46.5Ranked 8th—· 2019
- Police reporting rate for sexual assault in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)5.8Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2019
- Police reporting rate for sexual violence in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)5Ranked 3rd· 2014
- Political civil liberties index0.92Ranked 20th▲ 4· 2025
- Political civil liberties index0.92Ranked 20th▲ 4· 2025
- Political corruption index0.03Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2025
- Political Corruption Index0.03Ranked 151st▼ 3· 2025
- Political Corruption Index0.03Ranked 151st▼ 3· 2025
- Political liberties1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Political opposition1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Political pluralism and participation (B)16Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Political polarization score-0.4Ranked 109th—· 2025
- Political regime4Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political regime2Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political regime7Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Political regime2Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Political regime2Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Political regime2Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political regime2Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Political regime (LIED+)7Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Political regime (trichotomous)1Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political rights aggregate score39Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Political rights rating1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Political rights rating (1-7)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Political rights score39Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)0.6Ranked 63rd▼ 2· 2024
- Political Stability - Governance score (0-100)76.1Ranked 63rd▼ 2· 2024
- Presidentialism index0.09Ranked 136th▲ 1· 2025
- Press Freedom Index15.3Ranked 161st▲ 4· 2021
- Prevalence of hypertension in men aged 30–79 years, age-standardized24.3Ranked 136th▼ 1· 2019
- Prevalence of hypertension in women aged 30–79 years, age-standardized19.9Ranked 137th▼ 1· 2019
- Private civil liberties index0.84Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2025
- Private civil liberties index0.84Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2025
- Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of local government (%)26.6%Ranked 24th· 2018
- Proportion of population subjected to physical assault in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)2.5Ranked 8th▲ 5· 2019
- Proportion of population subjected to physical violence in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)2.5Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of population subjected to robbery in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)0.6Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2019
- Proportion of population subjected to sexual assault in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)1.3Ranked 8th▲ 7· 2019
- Proportion of population subjected to sexual violence in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)2.2Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Proportion of population that feel safe walking alone around the area they live after dark (%)87.6Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2019
- Proportion of population who believe decision-making is inclusive (%)40.3Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2023
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of government services (%)68.9Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of healthcare services (%)49.3Ranked 48th▲ 23· 2023
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of secondary education services (%)68.3Ranked 5th▼ 13· 2023
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%)30.3%Ranked 68th▲ 7· 2025
- Proportion of the population who have experienced a dispute in the past two years who accessed a formal or informal dispute resolution mechanism (%)65.9Ranked 5th· 2021
- Proportion of time spent on unpaid domestic and care work, female (% of 24 hour day)16.5Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of time spent on unpaid domestic and care work, male (% of 24 hour day) 11.6Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Proportions of positions in the judiciary compared to national distributions (ratio) - All age ranges or no breaks by age - No breakdown by disability - TOTAL - Female - JUDGES0.93Ranked 18th▼ 14· 2023
- Public sector corruption index0.01Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Public Sector Corruption Index0.01Ranked 160th▲ 5· 2025
- Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral0.6Ranked 74th▲ 9· 2026
- Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Upper Chamber1.1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2026
- Recent electoral turnover1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Regime3Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Regulation of political participation5Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)1.4Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2024
- Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)76.3Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2024
- Respect for counterarguments0.6Ranked 76th▼ 4· 2025
- Rigorous and impartial public administration1.9Ranked 29th▲ 5· 2025
- Rule of law (F)15Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)1.5Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100)82.1Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Rule of law index0.96Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2025
- Science helps a lot27.5%Ranked 73rd· 2020
- Share of deaths that are registered100%Ranked 129th▼ 5· 2019
- Share of firms reporting corruption as a major constraint4.6%Ranked 38th· 2024
- Share of firms that were asked to pay a bribe5.8%Ranked 22nd· 2024
- Share of population in poverty ($10 a day)0.8%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of women in ministerial positions45.7%Ranked 10th▼ 4· 2024
- Share of women in parliament30.3%Ranked 54th—· 2025
- Share - Question: mh3b - How much science helps to treat anxiety or depression - Answer: A lot - Gender: all - Age group: all27.5%Ranked 73rd· 2020
- Share - Question: mh4b - Important for national government to fund research on anxiety/depression - Answer: Extremely important - Gender: all - Age group: all64.4%Ranked 38th· 2020
- Share - Question: mh5 - Someone local comfortable speaking about anxiety/depression with someone they know - Answer: Not at all comfortable - Gender: all - Age group: all30.2%Ranked 64th· 2020
- Share - Question: mh6 - Friends/family have been anxious/depressed - Answer: Yes - Gender: all - Age group: all58.3%Ranked 5th· 2020
- Share reporting lifetime anxiety or depression24.2%Ranked 42nd· 2020
- Share who spoke to friends or family84.2%Ranked 33rd· 2020
- Sovereign state1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Sovereign state1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Spouses have equal rights to manage their own and joint assets1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- State Capacity Index2.1Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2015
- Statistical agency operating1Ranked 1st—· 2015
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100)92.4Ranked 3rd▼ 8· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100)92.4Ranked 3rd▼ 8· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100)93.3Ranked 29th▲ 7· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)87.2Ranked 16th▼ 26· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)91.3Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)90Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2024
- Talked to friends or family84.2%Ranked 33rd· 2020
- Territory under state control97%Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2025
- Took prescribed medication73%Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Total democracy score97Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2025
- Transparent laws with predictable enforcement1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Universal right to vote2Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Universal right to vote for men1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Universal right to vote for women1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Universal right to vote in practice2Ranked 1st—· 2025
- UN Security Council6.7%Ranked 1st· 2000
- Unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population (%)49.9Ranked 15th▼ 14· 2023
- Upper house seats98Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2026
- VAP turnout, parliamentary61.3%Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_api0.93Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xca_academ0.85Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_acjst0.89Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_disc0.91Ranked 31st—· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_dmove0.79Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_prpty0.78Ranked 63rd▼ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_slave0.84Ranked 27th▼ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_cspart0.94Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xdl_delib0.79Ranked 47th▼ 11· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_EDcomp_thick0.88Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_cent0.01Ranked 139th▼ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_con0.93Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_ctag0.16Ranked 123rd▲ 4· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_dmcon0.94Ranked 7th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_inco0.02Ranked 139th▲ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_inpt0.22Ranked 131st▲ 4· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_poed0.79Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_ptcon0.48Ranked 82nd▼ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ptcon0.35Ranked 102nd▲ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_inpt0.01Ranked 146th▲ 5· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_cent0.11Ranked 135th▼ 7· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_ctag0.08Ranked 132nd▼ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_inco0.1Ranked 143rd▲ 4· 2021
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqaccess0.84Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqdr0.83Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqprotec0.46Ranked 114th▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xel_locelec0.96Ranked 26th▼ 9· 2025
- V-Dem v2xel_regelec0.97Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_freexp0.93Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xme_altinf0.92Ranked 10th—· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_mpi0.75Ranked 13th▼ 5· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_client0.06Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_pres0.09Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_regcorr0.03Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2025
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlecon0.2Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlgender0.11Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlgeo0.11Ranked 38th▲ 3· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlpol0.12Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlsocgr0.08Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- V-Dem v2xps_party0.91Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2025
- Vertical accountability index1.5Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2025
- Very comfortable8.9%Ranked 101st· 2020
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)1.5Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2024
- Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)83.2Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2024
- Voter turnout of registered voters68.7%Ranked 21st▼ 7· 2025
- Voter turnout, parliamentary68.7%Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2025
- Women and men have the same rights to own property1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women civil liberties index0.8Ranked 50th—· 2025
- Women civil society participation index0.84Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- Women have the same rights to remarry as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women in lower/single house (%)30.6%Ranked 58th▲ 2· 2026
- Women in lower/single house (count)105Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2026
- Women in upper house (%)55.1%Ranked 3rd—· 2026
- Women in upper house (count)54Ranked 7th—· 2026
- Women political empowerment index0.87Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2025
- Women political participation index0.99Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Women's civil rights index0.8Ranked 50th—· 2025
- Women's civil society participation index0.84Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- Women's political empowerment index0.87Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2025
- Women's political empowerment index0.87Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2025
- Women's political participation index0.99Ranked 7th—· 2025
Economy
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2090Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2090UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2090
GDP
- GDP2.32TRanked 10th▲ 1· 2025
- GDP per capita, PPP57,989.6Ranked 24th▼ 4· 2025
- GDP growth1.7%Ranked 142nd▲ 2· 2025
- Inflation2.1%Ranked 56th▼ 7· 2025
- Unemployment6.9%Ranked 124th▲ 11· 2025
- Trade openness63.5%Ranked 87th▼ 23· 2025
- FDI net inflows3%Ranked 30th▼ 53· 2025
- Tax revenue13.7%Ranked 64th▼ 19· 2024
- Current account balance-0.95%Ranked 49th▼ 21· 2025
- Gross savings22.2%Ranked 44th▼ 36· 2025
- Gross capital formation23.2%Ranked 65th▼ 19· 2025
- Government expenditure19.1%Ranked 65th▼ 24· 2023
- Personal remittances received0.04%Ranked 90th▼ 64· 2025
- R&D expenditure1.8%Ranked 1st▼ 21· 2024
- Researchers in R&D5,624.3Ranked 14th—· 2022
- High-technology exports16.8%Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2024
- Youth unemployment13.8%Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2025
- Agricultural employment1.1%Ranked 171st—· 2025
- Vulnerable employment9.6%Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2025
- Agriculture value added1.9%Ranked 148th▼ 9· 2022
- Industry value added27.4%Ranked 71st▼ 15· 2022
- GDP per capita (nominal)55,697.7Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2025
- Annual working hours per worker1,731Ranked 89th▲ 1· 2023
- GNI per capita (PPP)54,688.4Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- 3.7Ranked 72nd▲ 11· 2023
- 10.4.1 - Labour share of GDP (%) - SL_EMP_GTOTL61.9%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2020
- 8.2.1 - Annual growth rate of real GDP per employed person (%) - SL_EMP_PCAP1.3%Ranked 96th▼ 12· 2024
- 8.8.1 - Fatal occupational injuries among employees, by sex and migrant status (per 100,000 employees) - SL_EMP_FTLINJUR - No breakdown - Both sexes5Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- 8.8.1 - Non-fatal occupational injuries among employees, by sex and migrant status (per 100,000 employees) - SL_EMP_INJUR - No breakdown - Both sexes1,463.5Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2022
- 8.b.1 - Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy - SL_CPA_YEMP3Ranked 1st—· 2024
- 9.2.2 - Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment - 13th ICLS (%) - SL_TLF_MANF8.8%Ranked 4th▼ 60· 2024
- Adjusted net national income (annual % growth)8.8Ranked 23rd▼ 84· 2021
- Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$)1.4TRanked 8th▼ 1· 2021
- Adjusted net national income (current US$)1.61TRanked 8th—· 2021
- Adjusted net national income per capita (annual % growth)8.2Ranked 23rd▼ 83· 2021
- Adjusted net national income per capita (constant 2015 US$)36,665.3Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2021
- Adjusted net national income per capita (current US$)41,986.2Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2021
- Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)150.34BRanked 115th▼ 4· 2021
- Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (% of GNI)7.6Ranked 55th▲ 20· 2021
- Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$)149.73BRanked 109th▼ 8· 2021
- Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (% of GNI)7.6Ranked 54th▲ 19· 2021
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)25.3BRanked 10th—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)1.3Ranked 94th▲ 7· 2021
- Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$)325.77BRanked 10th—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (% of GNI)16.5Ranked 57th▲ 14· 2021
- Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$)88.42BRanked 9th▼ 1· 2021
- Adjusted savings: education expenditure (% of GNI)4.5Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2021
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$)27.27BRanked 7th▼ 19· 2021
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion (% of GNI)1.4Ranked 40th▼ 22· 2021
- Adjusted savings: gross savings (% of GNI)23.1Ranked 69th▼ 28· 2021
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)15.59BRanked 6th▼ 8· 2021
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI)0.79Ranked 42nd▼ 4· 2021
- Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI)2.2Ranked 73rd▼ 26· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)0Ranked 112th—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)0Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$)130.07BRanked 11th▼ 32· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net national savings (% of GNI)6.6Ranked 80th▼ 49· 2021
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)607.91MRanked 129th▼ 9· 2021
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (% of GNI)0.03Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2021
- Affordability of cigarettes (as a share of GDP per capita)2%Ranked 129th▼ 5· 2022
- After tax0.3%Ranked 15th▼ 7· 2023
- Age 15-2413.3%Ranked 86th▼ 20· 2024
- Age 65+481,657Ranked 22nd—· 2024
- Aged 15-2463%Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2024
- Aged 15-2463.2%Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2024
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)6.4Ranked 33rd▼ 53· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)35.39BRanked 18th▼ 4· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)45.62BRanked 82nd▼ 3· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)55.36BRanked 92nd▼ 2· 2022
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)42.53BRanked 18th▼ 9· 2022
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)150,631.6Ranked 1st—· 2025
- AHDI excluding income0.81Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- Air transport, freight (million ton-km)2.04BRanked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Air transport, freight (million ton-km)2,036.4Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Air transport, passengers carried88.62MRanked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Air transport, passengers carried88.62MRanked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Air transport, passengers carried88.62MRanked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide1.08MRanked 5th—· 2023
- Air travel trips per capita2Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2019
- Alcohol and tobacco as share of total consumer expenditure3.5%Ranked 42nd▲ 1· 2023
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), End-of-period (EoP)187.4Ranked 74th—· 2031
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), End-of-period (EoP), percent change2Ranked 94th▼ 8· 2031
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), Period average186Ranked 75th—· 2031
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), Period average, percent change2Ranked 108th▲ 7· 2031
- Amount of tracked exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)24.12BRanked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)40.15BRanked 8th▼ 1· 2024
- Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)3.21BRanked 2nd▼ 2· 2024
- Amount of tracked re-imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)531.92MRanked 3rd—· 2024
- Annual broad money growth (%)14.9%Ranked 78th▼ 79· 2008
- Annual broad money growth (%)14.9Ranked 80th▼ 82· 2008
- Annual economic damages as a share of GDP from droughts0.16%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 1988
- Annual GDP growth (%)1.6Ranked 146th—· 2024
- Annual GDP growth (%)1.3%Ranked 122nd▲ 20· 2023
- Annual growth of exports of goods and services (%)0.55Ranked 96th▲ 41· 2024
- Annual growth of households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (%)1.7Ranked 109th▲ 33· 2023
- Annual growth of imports of goods and services (%)0.72Ranked 106th▲ 31· 2024
- Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%)1.5%Ranked 81st▲ 26· 2023
- Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%)1.5Ranked 91st▲ 34· 2023
- Annual growth of the gross capital formation (%)-2.1Ranked 108th▼ 8· 2024
- Annual growth of the gross capital formation (%)-5.9%Ranked 100th▲ 30· 2023
- Annual growth rate of real GDP per capita (%)0.9Ranked 57th▼ 5· 2024
- Annual inflation, consumer prices (%)2.4Ranked 63rd▲ 11· 2024
- Annual rate of deaths from all disasters excluding extreme temperatures0.01Ranked 9th▼ 8· 2024
- Annual rate of people affected by all disasters excluding extreme temperatures8.9Ranked 104th▲ 25· 2024
- Annual working hours per worker1,731Ranked 89th▲ 1· 2023
- Arrivals of same-day visitors from abroad9.91MRanked 8th—· 2024
- Arrivals of same-day visitors from abroad per 1,000 people249.2Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad19.91MRanked 11th—· 2024
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes17.96MRanked 7th▼ 1· 2024
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes17.96MRanked 7th▼ 1· 2024
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad per 1,000 people501.1Ranked 38th—· 2024
- Augmented Human Development Index (AHDI)0.83Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- Automated teller machines (ATMs) (per 100,000 adults)173.8Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- Automated teller machines (ATMs) (per 100,000 adults)173.8Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- Average farm size273.4Ranked 3rd—· 2000
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)40.1Ranked 16th▼ 11· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)40.1Ranked 16th▼ 11· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)40.1Ranked 17th▼ 11· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)40.1Ranked 17th▼ 11· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees - Male34.9Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees - Total33Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of public sector employees (local currency)47.8Ranked 16th▼ 10· 2025
- Average hourly labour cost per employee by economic activity - Discontinued (local currency)46Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2024
- Average hourly labour cost per employee - Discontinued (local currency)46Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2024
- Average length of stay in hotels and similar establishments2.1Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and citizenship (local currency)49,834Ranked 5th· 2016
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)5,761.9Ranked 17th▼ 15· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)5,761.9Ranked 17th▼ 15· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)5,761.9Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and occupation (local currency)897.5Ranked 75th▲ 5· 2014
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and place of birth (local currency)1,290.3Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2024
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)5,761.9Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of public sector employees (local currency)6,559.7Ranked 15th▼ 15· 2025
- Average time to clear exports through customs (days)3.3Ranked 33rd· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex34.8Ranked 36th▼ 36· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and economic activity34.8Ranked 52nd▼ 20· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and occupation32.9Ranked 88th—· 2014
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and public/private sector34.8Ranked 30th▼ 22· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and education34.8Ranked 34th▼ 35· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and marital status34.8Ranked 28th▼ 23· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and public/private sector34.8Ranked 29th▼ 22· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202531.9Ranked 149th▼ 2· 2027
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, public/private sector and marital status34.8Ranked 26th▼ 20· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex34.7Ranked 36th▼ 37· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and economic activity34.7Ranked 52nd▼ 22· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and education34.7Ranked 35th▼ 36· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and marital status34.7Ranked 29th▼ 27· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and occupation32.6Ranked 93rd▲ 7· 2014
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and public/private sector34.7Ranked 31st▼ 25· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and education34.7Ranked 34th▼ 36· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and marital status34.7Ranked 28th▼ 27· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and public/private sector34.7Ranked 30th▼ 25· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, public/private sector and marital status34.7Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in the public sector29.8Ranked 31st▼ 25· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in the public sector29.8Ranked 31st▼ 26· 2025
- Average weekly hours usually worked per employed person by sex35.5Ranked 26th▼ 37· 2025
- Average weekly hours usually worked per employee by sex35.3Ranked 26th▼ 33· 2025
- Average working hours per worker1,731Ranked 89th▲ 1· 2023
- avh1,689.3Ranked 47th▲ 2· 2019
- Bank capital to assets ratio (%)4.9Ranked 87th▼ 32· 2025
- Bank capital to assets ratio (%)4.7Ranked 100th▼ 28· 2023
- Bank capital to assets ratio (%)4.9%Ranked 112th▼ 10· 2022
- Bank liquid reserves to bank assets ratio (%)0.23Ranked 137th▲ 2· 2008
- Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%)0.71Ranked 88th▼ 38· 2025
- Borrowed from family or friends14%Ranked 102nd▼ 13· 2021
- Borrowed to start, operate, or expand a farm or business, female (% age 15+)1.7%Ranked 113th▲ 16· 2017
- Bribery incidence (% of firms experiencing at least one bribe payment request)5.8Ranked 23rd· 2024
- Broad money (current LCU)2.03TRanked 40th—· 2008
- Broad money growth (annual %)14.9Ranked 80th▼ 82· 2008
- Broad money (% of GDP)122.6Ranked 9th▼ 6· 2008
- Broad money to total reserves ratio43.4Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2008
- Broad money to total reserves ratio43.4Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2008
- Broad money to total reserves ratio43.4Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2008
- Caloric supply3,590Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Carbon intensity137.2Ranked 180th—· 2024
- Cases of fatal occupational injury by economic activity1,057Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Cases of fatal occupational injury by sex and migrant status353Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2014
- Cases of non-fatal occupational injury by economic activity274,022Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Cases of non-fatal occupational injury by sex and migrant status211,660Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2014
- Cash surplus/deficit as a proportion of GDP (%)-19.3Ranked 24th—· 2023
- ccon1.44MRanked 14th—· 2019
- cda1.88MRanked 15th—· 2019
- Central government debt, total (current LCU)1.99TRanked 17th▼ 4· 2024
- Central government debt, total (% of GDP)64.1Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2024
- cgdpe1.84MRanked 16th—· 2019
- cgdpo1.86MRanked 16th—· 2019
- Changes in inventories (current LCU)8.18BRanked 51st▼ 8· 2025
- Changes in inventories (current US$)5.85BRanked 19th▼ 1· 2025
- Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$)20.2BRanked 9th—· 2025
- Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$)7.81BRanked 12th▼ 1· 2025
- Chemicals (% of value added in manufacturing)10.3Ranked 6th▼ 28· 2024
- ck0.1Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2019
- Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money)4.6Ranked 36th▼ 38· 2008
- Claims on central government, etc. (% GDP)15.4Ranked 24th▼ 15· 2008
- Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy (annual growth as % of broad money)23.1Ranked 39th▼ 88· 2008
- Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy (% of GDP)194.8Ranked 3rd—· 2006
- Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money)6.1Ranked 128th▼ 28· 2008
- cn8.43MRanked 16th—· 2019
- Coal consumption per capita2Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2024
- Coal rents (% of GDP)0.07Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2021
- Coefficient of variation in calorie consumption0.2Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2020
- Collective bargaining coverage rate (%)31.3Ranked 7th▼ 8· 2020
- Combined corporate income tax rate (CTSD, OECD (2019))26.8%Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2018
- Commercial bank branches (per 100,000 adults)18Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2024
- Commercial bank branches (per 100,000 adults)18Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2024
- Communications, computer, etc. (% of service exports, BoP)32.5Ranked 41st▼ 26· 2025
- Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP)48.3Ranked 26th▼ 11· 2025
- Compensation of employees (current LCU)61.54BRanked 45th▼ 12· 2024
- Compensation of employees (% of expense)10.2%Ranked 74th▼ 20· 2023
- Compensation of employees (% of expense)10.2Ranked 74th▼ 20· 2023
- Consumer price index (2010 = 100)141Ranked 118th▼ 4· 2025
- Consumer price index (2010 = 100)141Ranked 117th▼ 4· 2025
- Consumer prices, all items (annual average % change)2.1%Ranked 110th▼ 3· 2025
- Container port traffic (TEU: 20 foot equivalent units)6.39MRanked 29th—· 2024
- Contraceptive prevalence73.3%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1995
- Contributing family workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)0.15Ranked 167th▼ 2· 2025
- Contributing family workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)0.06Ranked 180th▼ 1· 2025
- Contributing family workers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)0.1Ranked 178th▲ 3· 2025
- cor_exp0.77Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2017
- Countries that have conducted at least one population and housing census in the last 10 years (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2016
- Countries with birth registration data that are at least 90 percent complete (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Countries with death registration data that are at least 75 percent complete (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans that are fully funded (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans that are under implementation (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans with funding from Government (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Credit-to-GDP gap (private non-financial sector)-15.9%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2025
- Credit-to-GDP ratio (private non-financial sector)218.3%Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Criminal sanctions or compensation for sexual harassment in employment1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- csh_c0.57Ranked 116th▲ 1· 2019
- csh_g0.2Ranked 84th▼ 2· 2019
- csh_i0.23Ranked 80th▼ 5· 2019
- csh_m-0.35Ranked 112th—· 2019
- csh_r-0.01Ranked 140th▲ 6· 2019
- csh_x0.35Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2019
- Current account balance as a proportion of GDP (%)-0.73%Ranked 76th▲ 21· 2023
- Current account balance as a proportion of GDP (%)-0.46Ranked 70th▼ 10· 2024
- Current account balance (BoP, current US$)-22.01BRanked 91st▼ 61· 2025
- Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP-0.02Ranked 64th▼ 5· 2031
- Current account balance (credit less debit), US dollar-705.68MRanked 103rd▼ 50· 2031
- cwtfp0.82Ranked 19th—· 2019
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from animal products70.7Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Daily protein supply per person112.9Ranked 35th▲ 11· 2023
- Data Infrastructure performance index (Statistical Performance Indicators Pillar 5) (Index)90Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2024
- Data Sources performance index (Statistical Performance Indicators Pillar 4) (Index)91.3Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Days lost due to cases of occupational injury with temporary incapacity for work by sex and migrant status16.47MRanked 3rd—· 2002
- Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts by economic activity6.58MRanked 2nd▼ 3· 2023
- Days not worked per 1000 workers due to strikes and lockouts by economic activity375.9Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2023
- Debt service ratio (private non-financial sector)25.3%Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2025
- DEC alternative conversion factor (in local currency unit per United States dollar)1.4Ranked 130th▼ 2· 2024
- DEC alternative conversion factor (LCU per US$)1.4Ranked 129th▼ 1· 2025
- delta0.03Ranked 151st▼ 1· 2019
- Deposit interest rate (%)0.1Ranked 120th▼ 1· 2017
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise exports (%)2.3Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise imports (%)2.3Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services exports (%)1.8Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services imports (%)2Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Discouraged jobseekers by sex and education (thousands)33.5Ranked 18th▼ 20· 2025
- Discouraged jobseekers by sex and marital status (thousands)33.5Ranked 16th▼ 16· 2025
- Discouraged jobseekers by sex, education and marital status (thousands)33.5Ranked 16th▼ 16· 2025
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU)2.35MRanked 41st▼ 13· 2025
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU)118MRanked 21st▼ 68· 2025
- Domestic credit provided by financial sector (% of GDP)212.8Ranked 3rd—· 2006
- Domestic credit to private sector by banks (% of GDP)124.1Ranked 12th—· 2008
- Domestic credit to private sector (% of GDP)124.1Ranked 14th—· 2008
- Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2015 United States dollars) - Total or no breakdown1.2Ranked 111th▲ 1· 2022
- Economic Complexity rank29Ranked 57th▼ 15· 2016
- emp19.3Ranked 31st—· 2019
- Employed foreign-born population by sex and country of birth (thousands)6,785.9Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2024
- Employed foreign citizens by sex and country of citizenship (thousands)1,762.8Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2021
- Employed persons in the tourism industries (number)2.07MRanked 7th▼ 11· 2024
- Employed persons, Persons for countries / Index for country groups21.23MRanked 9th—· 2027
- Employees87%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by economic activity and occupation (thousands)15,076.9Ranked 16th—· 2014
- Employees by sex and economic activity (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2025
- Employees by sex and education (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2025
- Employees by sex and marital status (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2025
- Employees by sex and multiple-job holding (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2025
- Employees by sex and occupation (thousands)15,076.9Ranked 17th—· 2014
- Employees by sex and public/private sector (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2025
- Employees by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- Employees by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2025
- Employees by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2025
- Employees by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2025
- Employees by sex, education and marital status (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2025
- Employees by sex, occupation and education (thousands)14,707.6Ranked 13th▲ 7· 2011
- Employees by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)14,707.6Ranked 15th▲ 10· 2011
- Employees by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)18,317.3Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2025
- Employees earning low pay by sex (thousands)3,292.3Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2021
- Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)1.9Ranked 99th▲ 1· 2025
- Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)4.7Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2025
- Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)3.4Ranked 95th▲ 5· 2025
- Employment by economic activity and occupation (thousands)17,802.2Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2014
- Employment by sex and economic activity -- 19th ICLS (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2025
- Employment by sex and economic activity -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)20,490Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 17th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment by sex and education (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment by sex and marital status (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2025
- Employment by sex and multiple-job holding (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Employment by sex and occupation -- 19th ICLS (thousands)17,802.2Ranked 10th· 2014
- Employment by sex and occupation -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)20,490Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Employment by sex and occupation (thousands)17,802.2Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2014
- Employment by sex and public/private sector (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 10th▼ 7· 2025
- Employment by sex and status in employment -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)20,490Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 17th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and citizenship (thousands)17,321.7Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2021
- Employment by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and multiple job holding (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and place of birth (thousands)20,730.5Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 10th▼ 7· 2025
- Employment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2025
- Employment by sex, multiple job holding and education (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Employment by sex, multiple job holding and marital status (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 11th▼ 8· 2025
- Employment by sex, occupation and citizenship (thousands)17,230Ranked 9th· 2016
- Employment by sex, occupation and education (thousands)16,567.2Ranked 17th▲ 8· 2011
- Employment by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)16,567.2Ranked 20th▲ 12· 2011
- Employment by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 9th▼ 7· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and citizenship (thousands)17,321.7Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2021
- Employment by sex, status in employment and economic activity (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and education (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and marital status (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and multiple job holding (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and occupation (thousands)16,567.2Ranked 20th▲ 10· 2011
- Employment by sex, status in employment and place of birth (thousands)20,730.5Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and public/private sector (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 10th▼ 7· 2025
- Employment by sex, weekly hours actually worked and education (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- Employment by sex, weekly hours actually worked and marital status (thousands)21,028.6Ranked 12th▼ 7· 2025
- Employment discrimination based on gender prohibited1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Employment in agriculture, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)0.71Ranked 163rd—· 2025
- Employment in agriculture, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)1.5Ranked 169th—· 2025
- Employment in industry18.7%Ranked 96th▲ 4· 2025
- Employment in industry, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)8.6Ranked 114th▲ 3· 2025
- Employment in industry, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)27.9Ranked 70th▲ 1· 2025
- Employment in industry (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)18.7Ranked 96th▲ 4· 2025
- Employment in services, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)90.7Ranked 30th—· 2025
- Employment in services, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)70.6Ranked 22nd—· 2025
- Employment in services (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)80.1Ranked 19th—· 2025
- Employment in the tourism industries per 1,000 people51.5Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)56.3Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (national estimate)57.1Ranked 22nd▼ 4· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)64Ranked 103rd▲ 3· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (national estimate)64.6Ranked 41st▼ 21· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)60.1Ranked 71st▲ 2· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%) (national estimate)60.8Ranked 30th▼ 8· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)55.6Ranked 19th—· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (national estimate)54.7Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)53.2Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (national estimate)53.9Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)54.3Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, total (%) (national estimate)54.3Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex and education (%)60.8Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex and marital status (%)60.8Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2025
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex, education and marital status (%)60.8Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2025
- EPL: additional provisions for collective dismissals1.2Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2025
- EPL: individual dismissals, regular contracts0.95Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2025
- EPL: temporary contracts0.28Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2025
- Estimated funding raised by privately held AI companies - Field: All9.56BRanked 6th▼ 3· 2025
- Estimated maternal deaths40.9Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2020
- Exchange rate vs euro (annual average)1.6Ranked 26th—· 2025
- Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy3Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Expenditure, General government, Domestic currency1.79TRanked 75th—· 2031
- Expenditure, General government, Percent of GDP43.3Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2031
- Expense (current LCU)565.06BRanked 42nd▼ 12· 2023
- Expense (% of GDP)19.1%Ranked 65th▼ 24· 2023
- Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU)810.49BRanked 60th▼ 4· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (annual % growth)-1.7Ranked 113th▲ 12· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$)726.63BRanked 13th▼ 1· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)560.95BRanked 12th▼ 1· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (constant LCU)745.33BRanked 62nd▼ 3· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU)1.02TRanked 67th▼ 2· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (current US$)726.88BRanked 13th▼ 1· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (% of GDP)31.3Ranked 83rd▼ 12· 2025
- Exports of goods and services, Volume, Free on board (FOB), Percent change3.7Ranked 66th▼ 8· 2031
- Exports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$)925.59BRanked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- Exports of goods, Volume, Free on board (FOB), Percent change3.7Ranked 61st▼ 12· 2031
- Extent of use of country-owned results frameworks and planning tools by providers of development cooperation - data by provider (%)43.4Ranked 21st▲ 8· 2026
- External balance on goods and services (constant LCU)-87.04BRanked 83rd▼ 24· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU)-27.43BRanked 83rd▼ 11· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (current US$)-19.62BRanked 128th▼ 9· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (% of GDP)-0.85%Ranked 65th▼ 7· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (% of GDP)-0.85Ranked 65th▼ 7· 2025
- Family or friends14%Ranked 102nd▼ 13· 2021
- Fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by economic activity5.2Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2023
- Fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status2Ranked 26th▼ 5· 2014
- Female labor force participation rate61.1%Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2024
- Female labor force participation rate60.2%Ranked 49th▲ 1· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate60.2%Ranked 49th▲ 1· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate60.2%Ranked 49th▲ 1· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate, ages 15-2462.8%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate in 198061.1%Ranked 19th▼ 5· 2025
- Female share of low pay earners (%)54.6Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2025
- Female unemployment rate6.6%Ranked 107th▲ 10· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)2.3Ranked 91st▼ 15· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)1.55TRanked 8th▼ 2· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)2.12TRanked 60th▼ 6· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)2.52TRanked 66th▼ 7· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (current US$)1.8TRanked 8th▼ 2· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)77.7Ranked 74th▼ 26· 2025
- Firms competing against unregistered firms (% of firms)17.4Ranked 39th· 2024
- Firms expected to give gifts in meetings with tax officials (% of firms)1.6Ranked 27th· 2024
- Firms experiencing electrical outages (% of firms)31.4Ranked 29th· 2024
- Firms filling taxes electronically (% of firms)98.4Ranked 16th· 2024
- Firms formally registered when operations started (% of firms)89.9Ranked 29th· 2024
- Firms offering formal training (% of firms)55.9Ranked 11th· 2024
- Firms that are fully credit constrained (% of firms)3Ranked 41st· 2024
- Firms that are partially credit constrained (% of firms)6.9Ranked 39th· 2024
- Firms that use a third party to resolve commercial disputes (% of firms)62.5Ranked 21st· 2024
- Firms using banks to finance investment (% of firms)29.9Ranked 19th· 2024
- Firms using banks to finance working capital (% of firms) 29Ranked 24th· 2024
- Firms visited or required meetings with tax officials (% of firms)19.5Ranked 33rd· 2024
- Firms where largest owner is also the top manager (% of firms)71.7Ranked 32nd· 2024
- Firms with a bank loan/line of credit (% of firms)56.4Ranked 7th· 2024
- Firms with at least 10% foreign ownership9.6Ranked 20th· 2024
- Firms with female participation in ownership (% of firms)37.1Ranked 19th· 2024
- Firms with female top manager (% of firms)21.9Ranked 17th· 2024
- Food, beverages and tobacco (% of value added in manufacturing)19.2Ranked 18th▼ 30· 2024
- Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows (millions of United States dollars)64,095.6Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net (BoP, current US$)-11.86BRanked 90th▲ 80· 2025
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows, as a proportion of GDP (%)2.8Ranked 82nd▼ 23· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$)69.03BRanked 8th▲ 2· 2025
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP)2.8%Ranked 82nd▼ 23· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$)57.17BRanked 8th▲ 3· 2025
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP)2.5Ranked 5th▼ 8· 2025
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP)3.9%Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2024
- Foreign guests staying in hotels and similar establishments6.61MRanked 18th▲ 6· 2024
- Forest rents (% of GDP)0.07Ranked 122nd▼ 2· 2021
- GDP2.17TRanked 16th—· 2023
- GDP (constant 2015 US$)1.89TRanked 11th—· 2025
- GDP (constant LCU)2.61TRanked 71st▼ 1· 2025
- GDP (current LCU)3.24TRanked 78th▼ 1· 2025
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country)124.4Ranked 126th▼ 7· 2025
- GDP deflator: linked series (base year varies by country)124.4Ranked 126th▼ 7· 2025
- GDP (Fouquin and Hugot (CEPII 2016))1.08TRanked 11th—· 2014
- GDP growth observations1.7%Ranked 60th▼ 61· 2025
- GDP: linked series (current LCU)3.24TRanked 78th▼ 1· 2025
- GDP per capita24,997.8Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2020
- GDP per capita56,706.8Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP per capita56,706.8Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP per capita45,418.1Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2025
- GDP per capita56,706.8Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP per capita55,101.4Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2023
- GDP per capita45,418.1Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2025
- GDP per capita45,529.6Ranked 19th—· 2022
- GDP per capita (2011 int-$)44,592Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2017
- GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$)45,418.1Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2025
- GDP per capita (constant LCU)62,597.3Ranked 96th▼ 8· 2025
- GDP per capita (current LCU)77,871.2Ranked 110th▼ 9· 2025
- GDP per capita growth (annual %)0.79Ranked 144th▼ 33· 2025
- GDP per capita growth (annual %)0.79%Ranked 138th▼ 37· 2025
- GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)66,745.8Ranked 24th▼ 4· 2025
- GDP per person employed (constant 2021 PPP $)110,254.4Ranked 26th—· 2024
- GDP per person employed (constant 2021 PPP $)113,563.3Ranked 26th—· 2025
- GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $)2.42TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2025
- GDP, PPP (current international $)2.78TRanked 16th—· 2025
- GDP price levels relative to the US0.84Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2024
- Gender Development Index0.99Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- General government debt110.8%Ranked 81st—· 2024
- General government final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)2.4Ranked 68th▲ 8· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)421.77BRanked 4th▼ 2· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)596.24BRanked 54th▼ 6· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU)710.48BRanked 63rd▼ 6· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$)508.18BRanked 4th▼ 3· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)21.9Ranked 24th▼ 14· 2025
- Gini coefficient0.31Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2022
- Gini coefficient50.5Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2022
- Gini coefficient after tax0.36Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2022
- Gini coefficient (before tax)0.5Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2022
- Gini coefficient (disposable income)0.31Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Gini coefficient (market income)0.43Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2023
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex0.33Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2025
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity0.33Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2025
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and education0.33Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2025
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and marital status0.33Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex0.33Ranked 10th▼ 18· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity0.33Ranked 10th▼ 18· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and education0.33Ranked 9th▼ 18· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and marital status0.33Ranked 9th▼ 17· 2025
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$)2.35TRanked 9th▼ 1· 2025
- GNI (constant 2015 US$)1.91TRanked 6th▼ 4· 2025
- GNI (constant LCU)2.63TRanked 51st▼ 11· 2025
- GNI (current LCU)3.25TRanked 78th▼ 1· 2025
- GNI (current US$)2.32TRanked 10th▲ 1· 2025
- GNI growth (annual %)1.6Ranked 83rd▼ 26· 2025
- GNI: linked series (current LCU)3.25TRanked 78th▼ 1· 2025
- GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$)56,420Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2025
- GNI per capita (constant 2015 US$)45,752.5Ranked 8th▼ 7· 2025
- GNI per capita (constant LCU)63,257.3Ranked 63rd▼ 20· 2025
- GNI per capita (current LCU)77,956.7Ranked 109th▼ 6· 2025
- GNI per capita growth (annual %)0.77Ranked 78th▼ 51· 2025
- GNI per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $)56,431.6Ranked 11th▼ 9· 2025
- GNI per capita, PPP (current international $)66,820Ranked 21st▼ 6· 2025
- GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $)2.35TRanked 8th▼ 5· 2025
- GNI, PPP (current international $)2.78TRanked 16th—· 2025
- Goods and services expense (current LCU)43.95BRanked 42nd▼ 10· 2024
- Goods and services expense (% of expense)7.4Ranked 71st▼ 13· 2023
- Goods exports (BoP, current US$)554.75BRanked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- Goods imports (BoP, current US$)577.43BRanked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- Government consumption as a share of GDP21.2%Ranked 68th▼ 6· 2023
- Government consumption as a share of GDP21.2%Ranked 68th▼ 6· 2023
- Government expenditure421.77BRanked 4th▼ 2· 2025
- Government expenditure (% of GDP)44.7%Ranked 28th▼ 7· 2024
- Government expenditure (% of GDP)44.7%Ranked 28th▼ 7· 2024
- Government expenditure per student, primary (% of GDP per capita)17.6%Ranked 35th· 2015
- Government revenues as a share of GDP42%Ranked 21st▼ 7· 2023
- Grants and other revenue (current LCU)49.37BRanked 46th▼ 13· 2024
- Grants and other revenue (% of revenue)7.9Ranked 68th▼ 24· 2024
- Gross capital formation (annual % growth)1.4Ranked 91st▼ 12· 2025
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$)406.46BRanked 10th▼ 2· 2025
- Gross capital formation (constant LCU)579.29BRanked 56th▼ 5· 2025
- Gross capital formation (current LCU)751.01BRanked 60th▼ 6· 2025
- Gross capital formation (current US$)537.16BRanked 8th▼ 3· 2025
- Gross capital formation, Percent of GDP23.5Ranked 85th—· 2031
- Gross debt, General government, Domestic currency4.28TRanked 118th—· 2031
- Gross debt, General government, Percent of GDP103.5Ranked 164th—· 2031
- Gross domestic income (constant LCU)2.67TRanked 57th▼ 6· 2025
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.76TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.76TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.89TRanked 11th—· 2025
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.76TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)2.34TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Domestic currency2.77TRanked 75th—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Per capita, Domestic currency64,766.3Ranked 100th—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Per capita, purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 202161,718.1Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Percent change1.8Ranked 145th▼ 5· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Domestic currency4.14TRanked 80th▲ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Fiscal year, Domestic currency4.14TRanked 80th▲ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Per capita, Domestic currency96,935Ranked 115th▲ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Per capita, US dollar73,536.1Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmarks 2017-20213.48TRanked 18th—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, US dollar3.14TRanked 9th▼ 1· 2031
- Gross Domestic Product, GDP in millions constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 20252.45MRanked 17th▲ 1· 2027
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Per capita, purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmarks 2017-202181,457.9Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Price deflator, Index149.7Ranked 109th▲ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, percent of world GDP, Percent, ICP benchmarks 2017-20211.2Ranked 18th—· 2031
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU)723.69BRanked 60th▼ 5· 2025
- Gross domestic savings (current US$)517.62BRanked 9th▼ 2· 2025
- Gross domestic savings (% of GDP)22.3Ranked 60th▼ 11· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth)1.4Ranked 83rd▼ 25· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$)399.42BRanked 10th▼ 1· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU)566.24BRanked 60th▼ 3· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU)742.83BRanked 59th▼ 6· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (current US$)531.31BRanked 7th▼ 2· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP)22.9Ranked 56th▼ 19· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$)1.95TRanked 8th▼ 2· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (constant LCU)2.7TRanked 56th▼ 7· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU)3.27TRanked 64th▼ 7· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (current US$)2.34TRanked 7th▼ 2· 2025
- Gross national expenditure deflator (base year varies by country)121.2Ranked 92nd▼ 28· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (% of GDP)100.8Ranked 71st▼ 25· 2025
- Gross national income (GNI) per capita56,431.6Ranked 11th▼ 9· 2025
- Gross national income (GNI) per capita56,431.6Ranked 11th▼ 9· 2025
- Gross national income per capita54,688.4Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Gross national income per capita (male)64,493.6Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2023
- Gross national savings, Percent of GDP23.5Ranked 70th▼ 3· 2031
- Gross public sector debt, Central Government, as a proportion of GDP (%)47.4Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Gross savings (current LCU)720.87BRanked 32nd▼ 27· 2025
- Gross savings (current US$)515.61BRanked 8th▼ 4· 2025
- Gross savings (% of GNI)22.2Ranked 46th▼ 32· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$)1.77TRanked 8th—· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU)2.44TRanked 65th▼ 1· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU)3.04TRanked 72nd▼ 3· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$)2.18TRanked 7th—· 2025
- Harmonized national poverty line39.9Ranked 13th· 2020
- Harmonized test scores among all students534Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)2.3Ranked 93rd▼ 18· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)1.12TRanked 7th▼ 3· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)1.52TRanked 60th▼ 7· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)1.81TRanked 68th▼ 5· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)1.29TRanked 8th▼ 3· 2025
- Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU)1.81TRanked 68th▼ 5· 2025
- Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)55.8Ranked 87th▼ 23· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$)26,972Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %)1.4Ranked 89th▼ 51· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $)30,249.7Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)34,461.9Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $)1.26TRanked 13th▼ 3· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $)1.44TRanked 16th▼ 1· 2025
- Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1)0.8Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Human Development Index0.94Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- ICT service exports (BoP, current US$)24.75BRanked 12th▲ 1· 2025
- ICT service exports (% of service exports, BoP)14.4Ranked 27th▼ 8· 2025
- Imports from China as a share of GDP3%Ranked 132nd▲ 7· 2024
- Imports of goods and services (annual % growth)-0.41Ranked 113th▼ 1· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$)746.62BRanked 11th—· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)620.41BRanked 10th—· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (constant LCU)832.36BRanked 63rd▼ 5· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (current LCU)1.04TRanked 70th▼ 3· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (current US$)746.5BRanked 11th—· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (% of GDP)32.2Ranked 91st▼ 20· 2025
- Imports of goods and services, Volume, Cost insurance freight (CIF), Percent change3.1Ranked 98th▼ 8· 2031
- Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$)943.04BRanked 10th▼ 2· 2025
- Imports of goods, Volume, Cost insurance freight (CIF), Percent change3.2Ranked 90th▼ 11· 2031
- Inactivity rate by sex and education (%)34.7Ranked 48th▼ 25· 2025
- Inactivity rate by sex and marital status (%)34.7Ranked 27th▼ 28· 2025
- Inactivity rate by sex, education and marital status (%)34.7Ranked 27th▼ 28· 2025
- Incidence of part-time employment by sex (%)81.8Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%31.1Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%31.1Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%31.1Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Income share of the richest 1%12.1%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2022
- Income share of the richest 10% after tax29.1%Ranked 39th▼ 8· 2022
- Income share of the richest 1% after tax9.1%Ranked 38th▼ 8· 2022
- Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count8,776Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2021
- Industrial design applications, resident, by count715Ranked 35th—· 2021
- Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth)1.3Ranked 110th▼ 21· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)424.98BRanked 10th▼ 1· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU)558.59BRanked 67th▼ 4· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU)783.36BRanked 73rd▼ 1· 2022
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$)601.87BRanked 7th▼ 2· 2022
- Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)106,575.1Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2025
- Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index0.87Ranked 135th▲ 4· 2023
- Inequality in income0.16Ranked 30th—· 2023
- Inflation, consumer prices (annual %)2.1%Ranked 56th▼ 6· 2025
- Inflation, GDP deflator (annual %)2.6Ranked 64th▲ 5· 2025
- Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series (annual %)2.6Ranked 64th▲ 5· 2025
- Inflow of working-age foreign-born population by sex and country of birth (thousands)286.5Ranked 6th· 2017
- Informal payments to public officials (% of firms)5.4Ranked 27th· 2024
- Inspectors per 10'000 employed persons0.11Ranked 30th▼ 9· 2024
- Insurance and financial services (% of service exports, BoP)9.7Ranked 16th▼ 11· 2025
- Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP)8.9Ranked 36th▼ 16· 2025
- Interest payments (current LCU)51.94BRanked 36th▼ 12· 2024
- Interest payments (% of expense)7.6%Ranked 39th▼ 11· 2023
- Interest payments (% of expense)7.6Ranked 39th▼ 11· 2023
- Interest payments (% of revenue)8.4Ranked 34th▼ 15· 2024
- Interest rate spread (lending rate minus deposit rate, %)2.6Ranked 102nd▼ 1· 2017
- International migrant stock, total8.81MRanked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- International tourism, expenditures (current US$)41.25BRanked 4th▼ 1· 2011
- International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)7.85BRanked 5th—· 2011
- International tourism, expenditures for travel items (current US$)12.08BRanked 9th▲ 1· 2020
- International tourism, expenditures (% of total imports)7.3Ranked 44th▼ 4· 2011
- International tourism, number of arrivals32.43MRanked 19th▲ 1· 2019
- International tourism, number of departures37.85MRanked 11th—· 2019
- International tourism, receipts (current US$)19.99BRanked 11th▲ 1· 2011
- International tourism, receipts for passenger transport items (current US$)3.16BRanked 13th▲ 1· 2011
- International tourism, receipts for travel items (current US$)11.26BRanked 12th▼ 2· 2020
- International tourism, receipts (% of total exports)3.7Ranked 118th▲ 3· 2011
- International tourist departures33.09MRanked 5th—· 2024
- International tourist departures per 1,000 people832.6Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2024
- International tourist departures per 1,000 people832.6Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2024
- irr0.05Ranked 116th▼ 2· 2019
- Jobs gap rate (%)9.1Ranked 20th▼ 17· 2025
- Jobs gap (thousands)2,108.6Ranked 11th▼ 7· 2025
- Labor force, female (% of total labor force)47.2Ranked 55th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate64.5%Ranked 68th▲ 2· 2025
- Labor force participation rate64.5%Ranked 68th▲ 2· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)76.7Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+) (national estimate)61.1Ranked 19th▼ 5· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)63.2Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (national estimate)62.8Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)62.9Ranked 30th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (national estimate)63.2Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)63.1Ranked 18th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, total (%) (national estimate)63Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)83.2Ranked 36th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate)68.9Ranked 103rd▲ 2· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15+) (national estimate)69.5Ranked 40th▼ 19· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)80Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate)64.5Ranked 68th▲ 2· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+) (national estimate)65.3Ranked 22nd▼ 8· 2025
- Labor force, total22.85MRanked 32nd▲ 1· 2025
- Labor force with advanced education, female (% of female working-age population with advanced education)70.6Ranked 12th▼ 58· 2025
- Labor force with advanced education, male (% of male working-age population with advanced education)76.5Ranked 15th▼ 63· 2025
- Labor force with advanced education (% of total working-age population with advanced education)73.5Ranked 13th▼ 62· 2025
- Labor force with basic education, female (% of female working-age population with basic education)34.4Ranked 11th▼ 36· 2025
- Labor force with basic education, male (% of male working-age population with basic education)46Ranked 17th▼ 48· 2025
- Labor force with basic education (% of total working-age population with basic education)40.6Ranked 16th▼ 43· 2025
- Labor force with intermediate education, female (% of female working-age population with intermediate education)51.8Ranked 12th▼ 55· 2025
- Labor force with intermediate education, male (% of male working-age population with intermediate education)67.1Ranked 13th▼ 62· 2025
- Labor force with intermediate education (% of total working-age population with intermediate education)59.8Ranked 13th▼ 59· 2025
- Labour dependency ratio -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 20250.98Ranked 138th▼ 5· 2027
- Labour force by sex and education (thousands)22,567.6Ranked 16th▼ 7· 2025
- Labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)22,567.6Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)22,567.6Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Labour force participation rate by sex and education (%)65.3Ranked 22nd▼ 5· 2025
- Labour force participation rate by sex and marital status (%)65.3Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2025
- Labour force participation rate by sex, education and marital status (%)65.3Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2025
- Labour income share as a percent of GDP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)58.6Ranked 21st—· 2026
- Labour inspection visits per inspector11.8Ranked 36th▼ 11· 2024
- labsh0.65Ranked 11th—· 2019
- Lead time to export, median case (days)4Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2018
- Lead time to import, median case (days)5Ranked 8th▼ 8· 2018
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 3: employment and economic benefits90%Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Legislation on sexual harassment in employment1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Lending interest rate (%)2.7Ranked 124th▲ 1· 2017
- Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining) based on International Labour Organization (ILO) textual sources and national legislation0.36Ranked 134th▲ 3· 2024
- Life expectancy at birth82.2Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2024
- Liner shipping connectivity index (maximum value in 2004 = 100)48.8Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2021
- Listed domestic companies, total4,377Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2025
- Local guests in hotels and similar establishments34.39MRanked 9th—· 2024
- Local guests in hotels and similar establishments34.39MRanked 9th—· 2024
- Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high)4.1Ranked 4th▼ 14· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high)4.2Ranked 3rd▼ 10· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high)3.6Ranked 5th▼ 17· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)4Ranked 3rd▼ 12· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Frequency with which shipments reach consignee within scheduled or expected time (1=low to 5=high)4.1Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Overall (1=low to 5=high)4Ranked 4th▼ 14· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high)4.3Ranked 3rd▼ 14· 2022
- Low pay rate by sex (%)20.1Ranked 11th▼ 24· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex (%)8.2Ranked 14th▼ 17· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex and education (%)8.2Ranked 14th▼ 17· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex and marital status (%)8.2Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex, education and marital status (%)8.2Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)8.7Ranked 78th▼ 1· 2027
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex (%)7.5Ranked 10th▼ 21· 2025
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex and education (%)7.5Ranked 10th▼ 20· 2025
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex and marital status (%)7.5Ranked 9th▼ 12· 2025
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex, education and marital status (%)7.5Ranked 9th▼ 12· 2025
- LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization by sex (thousands)2,012Ranked 11th▼ 9· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex (%)8.9Ranked 24th▼ 30· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex and education (%)8.9Ranked 24th▼ 30· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex and marital status (%)8.9Ranked 20th▼ 14· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex, education and marital status (%)8.9Ranked 20th▼ 14· 2025
- Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing)23.4Ranked 3rd▼ 20· 2024
- Male employment in industry27.9%Ranked 70th▲ 1· 2025
- Male employment in services70.6%Ranked 21st—· 2025
- Male labor force participation rate68.9%Ranked 103rd▲ 2· 2025
- Male unemployment rate7.2%Ranked 132nd▲ 8· 2025
- Management practices index62.8Ranked 9th· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (annual % growth)-2.6Ranked 124th▼ 22· 2025
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$)158.25BRanked 13th▼ 2· 2025
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU)211.97BRanked 56th▼ 9· 2025
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU)267.07BRanked 72nd▼ 2· 2022
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$)205.19BRanked 13th▼ 1· 2022
- Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP)9.3Ranked 114th▲ 2· 2022
- Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP)9.3%Ranked 113th▲ 2· 2022
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (current US$)4.62TRanked 6th—· 2025
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (% of GDP)199.2Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2025
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (% of GDP)199.2%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2025
- Mean60.6Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2019
- Mean60.6Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Mean75.7Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Mean75.7Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Mean65.7Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2019
- Mean75.7Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Mean income or consumption per day75.7Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Mean income or consumption per day (2011 prices)60.6Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Mechanisms in place to enhance policy coherence for sustainable development (%)82Ranked 9th· 2025
- Median51.9Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Median64.7Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Median (2021 prices)64.7Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)32Ranked 15th▼ 11· 2025
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)32Ranked 15th▼ 11· 2025
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)32Ranked 16th▼ 11· 2025
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)32Ranked 16th▼ 11· 2025
- Median income or consumption per day64.7Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)5,026.7Ranked 16th▼ 15· 2025
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)5,026.7Ranked 16th▼ 14· 2025
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)5,026.7Ranked 17th▼ 14· 2025
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)5,026.7Ranked 17th▼ 14· 2025
- Medical doctors per 1,000 people2.8Ranked 20th▼ 35· 2023
- Medium and high-tech manufacturing value added (% manufacturing value added)31.9Ranked 48th—· 2022
- Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP (%)50.9Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2024
- Merchandise trade (% of GDP)48.8Ranked 105th▼ 7· 2025
- Military expenditure (% of GDP)1.6%Ranked 77th▼ 10· 2025
- Military expenditure (% of GDP)0.92%Ranked 115th▼ 4· 2019
- Mineral rents (% of GDP)1.2Ranked 43rd▼ 3· 2021
- Mismanaged plastic waste0.63Ranked 109th· 2019
- Monetary Sector credit to private sector (% GDP)124.1Ranked 12th—· 2008
- Monthly minimum wage (local currency)2,884Ranked 88th▲ 3· 2024
- National estimates6.8%Ranked 22nd▼ 15· 2025
- Natural gas rents (% of GDP)0.79Ranked 30th▼ 67· 2021
- NBER-United Nations38.2Ranked 48th▲ 5· 2000
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex (%)13.3Ranked 29th▼ 27· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- 19th ICLS (%)13.3Ranked 20th▼ 20· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and education (%)13.3Ranked 28th▼ 27· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and marital status (%)13.3Ranked 25th▼ 22· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)13.1Ranked 125th▲ 1· 2027
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- 19th ICLS (thousands)664.8Ranked 10th▼ 9· 2025
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and education (thousands)664.8Ranked 14th▼ 16· 2025
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and marital status (thousands)664.8Ranked 13th▼ 16· 2025
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)608.7Ranked 63rd—· 2027
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex (thousands)664.8Ranked 16th▼ 14· 2025
- Net acquisition of financial assets (current LCU)121.6BRanked 15th▼ 9· 2024
- Net acquisition of financial assets (% of GDP)3.9Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2024
- Net barter terms of trade index (2015 = 100)109.9Ranked 64th▲ 13· 2024
- Net capital account (BoP, current US$)-1.67BRanked 85th▼ 56· 2025
- Net debt, General government, Domestic currency430.3BRanked 35th—· 2031
- Net debt, General government, Percent of GDP10.4Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2031
- Net domestic credit (current LCU)2.85TRanked 35th▼ 1· 2008
- Net errors and omissions (BoP, current US$)8.01BRanked 6th▼ 142· 2025
- Net financial account (BoP, current US$)-15.67BRanked 88th▼ 66· 2025
- Net foreign assets (current LCU)11.25BRanked 110th▼ 5· 2008
- Net incurrence of liabilities, total (current LCU)156.98BRanked 29th▼ 13· 2024
- Net incurrence of liabilities, total (% of GDP)5Ranked 17th▼ 34· 2024
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets (current LCU)17.61BRanked 50th▼ 15· 2024
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets (% of GDP)0.57Ranked 81st▼ 23· 2024
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) (current LCU)-36.34BRanked 50th▲ 42· 2024
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Domestic currency-63.06BRanked 104th▼ 3· 2031
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Percent of GDP-1.5Ranked 68th▼ 4· 2031
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) (% of GDP)-1.2Ranked 31st▲ 9· 2024
- Net ODA provided, total (constant 2023 US$)8.68BRanked 6th—· 2024
- Net ODA provided, total (current US$)8.79BRanked 6th—· 2024
- Net ODA provided, total (% of GNI)0.26Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2017
- Net ODA provided, to the least developed countries (current US$)1.06BRanked 6th—· 2023
- Net ODA provided to the least developed countries (% of GNI)0.05Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2023
- Net official development assistance (ODA) as a percentage of OECD-DAC donors' GNI, by donor countries (%)0.26Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2017
- Net official development assistance (ODA) from OECD-DAC countries, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)10,097.2Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Net official development assistance (ODA) to landlocked developing countries as a percentage of OECD-DAC donors' GNI, by donor countries (%)0.04Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2024
- Net official development assistance (ODA) to landlocked developing countries from OECD-DAC countries, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)849.3Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Net official development assistance (ODA) to LDCs as a percentage of OECD-DAC donors' GNI, by donor countries (%)0.07Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Net official development assistance (ODA) to LDCs from OECD-DAC countries, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)1,633.7Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Net official development assistance (ODA) to small island states (SIDS) as a percentage of OECD-DAC donors' GNI, by donor countries (%)0.02Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2024
- Net official development assistance (ODA) to small island states (SIDS) from OECD-DAC countries, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)398.5Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2024
- Net primary income (BoP, current US$)2.55BRanked 13th▼ 111· 2025
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (constant LCU)-35.71BRanked 9th▼ 14· 2025
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current LCU)-43.38BRanked 89th▼ 40· 2025
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current US$)-31.03BRanked 148th▼ 39· 2025
- Net secondary income (BoP, current US$)-4.56BRanked 80th▼ 54· 2025
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (constant LCU)-23.56BRanked 49th▼ 36· 2013
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current LCU)-6.38BRanked 111th▼ 39· 2025
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current US$)-4.56BRanked 121st▼ 34· 2025
- Net trade in goods and services (BoP, current US$)-19.99BRanked 88th▼ 47· 2025
- Net trade in goods (BoP, current US$)-22.68BRanked 86th▼ 36· 2025
- New business density (new registrations per 1,000 people ages 15-64)5.2Ranked 47th▲ 8· 2022
- New businesses registered (number)131,783Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Non-fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by economic activity1,347.6Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Non-fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status1,189Ranked 14th—· 2014
- Number of countries reporting progress in multi-stakeholder development effectiveness monitoring frameworks that support the achievement of the sustainable development goals, Provider (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2026
- Number of countries with an outward investment promotion scheme which can benefit developing countries, including LDCs (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Number of labour inspection visits2,708Ranked 34th▼ 6· 2024
- Number of labour inspectors by sex230Ranked 21st▼ 7· 2024
- Number of policies22Ranked 54th· 2022
- Number of registered workplaces that could be selected for labour inspection43,538Ranked 26th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of strikes and lockouts by economic activity778Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2023
- Number of tourism satellite account tables implemented5Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of visits or required meetings with tax officials (average for affected firms)2.8Ranked 7th· 2024
- Number of volunteers by sex and type of volunteer work (thousands)24,514Ranked 2nd· 2018
- Number of workers involved in strikes and lockouts by economic activity (thousands)541Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Obesity prevalence27.1%Ranked 82nd—· 2024
- OEC ECI Ranking (Observatory of Economic Complexity (2016))29Ranked 57th▼ 15· 2016
- Official development assistance (ODA) as a percentage of OECD-DAC donors' GNI on grant equivalent basis, by donor countries (%)0.32Ranked 19th—· 2025
- Official development assistance (ODA) from OECD-DAC countries on grant equivalent basis, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)7,220Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2025
- Official exchange rate (LCU per US$, period average)1.4Ranked 101st▼ 13· 2025
- Oil rents (% of GDP)2.8%Ranked 29th▼ 6· 2021
- Oil rents (% of GDP)2.8Ranked 29th▼ 6· 2021
- Open Data Inventory (ODIN) Coverage Index76.6Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2024
- Other expense (current LCU)61.8BRanked 30th▼ 17· 2024
- Other expense (% of expense)6.2Ranked 47th▼ 19· 2023
- Other manufacturing (% of value added in manufacturing)46.1Ranked 4th▼ 29· 2024
- Out-of-pocket as share of total expenditure (%)15.3%Ranked 9th▼ 132· 2024
- Output gap, Percent of potential GDP-0.01Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2031
- Output per hour worked, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202571.7Ranked 23rd—· 2027
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202593,022.8Ranked 21st—· 2027
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025118,771.1Ranked 28th—· 2027
- Palma ratio (before tax)3.5Ranked 27th▼ 9· 2022
- Palma ratio (disposable income)1.1Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2023
- Part time employment, female (% of total female employment)76.1Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2025
- Part time employment, male (% of total male employment)86.9Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Part time employment, total (% of total employment)81.8Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport - Air transport227.84BRanked 9th▼ 7· 2022
- Patent applications, nonresidents32,445Ranked 6th—· 2021
- Patent applications, residents4,710Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2021
- Per capita plastic waste0.09Ranked 67th· 2010
- Personal remittances851.44MRanked 90th▼ 3· 2024
- Personal remittances, paid (current US$)15.11BRanked 9th▼ 1· 2025
- Personal remittances, received (current US$)834.01MRanked 68th▼ 23· 2025
- Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)0.04%Ranked 168th▼ 8· 2024
- Persons outside the labour force by sex and education (thousands)12,001.8Ranked 17th▼ 6· 2025
- Persons outside the labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)12,001.8Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2025
- Persons outside the labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)12,001.8Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2025
- Plastic waste exports0Ranked 74th▲ 68· 2024
- Plastic waste imports per capita3.9Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2024
- pl_c0.95Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2019
- pl_con0.95Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2019
- pl_da0.95Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2019
- pl_g0.98Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2019
- pl_gdpo0.94Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2019
- pl_i0.92Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2019
- pl_k0.68Ranked 65th▼ 4· 2019
- pl_m0.7Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2019
- pl_n0.81Ranked 17th—· 2019
- pl_x0.68Ranked 59th▼ 7· 2019
- Poorest 40% borrowing from financial institutions71.7%Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Poorest decile31.1Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Poorest decile6,486.8Ranked 22nd—· 2022
- pop37.4Ranked 38th—· 2019
- Population by sex -- UN estimates and projections, July 2024 (thousands)35,670.3Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2030
- Population, Persons for countries / Index for country groups42.69MRanked 37th—· 2031
- Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$)-13.05BRanked 77th▼ 36· 2025
- Portfolio investment, net (Balance of Payments, current United States dollars)15.38BRanked 15th▼ 146· 2023
- Portfolio investment, net (Balance of Payments, current United States dollars)-57.72BRanked 144th▲ 127· 2024
- Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$)11.67BRanked 15th▼ 140· 2025
- Potential labour force and willing non-jobseekers rate (%)2.5Ranked 22nd▼ 26· 2025
- Potential labour force and willing non-jobseekers (thousands)569.6Ranked 12th▼ 11· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex and education (thousands)160.3Ranked 16th▼ 16· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)160.3Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)160.3Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex (thousands)160.3Ranked 16th▼ 16· 2025
- PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $)1.2Ranked 134th▼ 7· 2025
- PPP conversion factor, households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (LCU per international $)1.3Ranked 119th▼ 4· 2025
- PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $)1.2Ranked 119th▼ 5· 2024
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49)14%Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2023
- Price level index (GDP)83.4Ranked 23rd—· 2025
- Price levels relative to the US0.84Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2024
- Primary income payments (BoP, current US$)196.42BRanked 9th▼ 3· 2025
- Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$)198.96BRanked 10th▼ 3· 2025
- Primary net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Domestic currency-35.05BRanked 128th▲ 1· 2031
- Primary net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Percent of GDP-0.85Ranked 108th▼ 5· 2031
- Private non-financial sector debt266.3%Ranked 28th▼ 7· 2024
- Productivity: output per hour worked62Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Productivity: output per hour worked62Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Projected change in death rate-194.4Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2090
- Proportion of domestic budget funded by domestic taxes (%)70.1Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of individuals using the Internet (%)94.4Ranked 24th—· 2024
- Proportion of medium and high-tech manufacturing value added in total value added (%) - Manufacturing32.9%Ranked 27th▼ 6· 2022
- Proportion of project objectives of new development interventions drawn from country-led result frameworks - data by provider (%)78.7Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2026
- Proportion of results indicators drawn from country-led results frameworks - data by provider (%)34Ranked 19th▲ 6· 2026
- Proportion of results indicators which will be monitored using government sources and monitoring systems - data by provider (%)17.5Ranked 22nd▲ 12· 2026
- Proportion of small-scale manufacturing industries in total manufacturing value added based on international classification (%) - Manufacturing2.8%Ranked 47th▲ 2· 2021
- Public sector employees by sex and type of job contract (thousands)4,548.8Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2025
- Public sector employment21%Ranked 28th· 2010
- Public sector employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)4,548.8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and education (thousands)4,548.8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and marital status (thousands)4,548.8Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)4,548.8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)4,548.8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)4,548.8Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2025
- Public social expenditure19.3%Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Quintile share ratio S80/S20 (disposable income)5Ranked 15th▼ 7· 2023
- Rail1.21BRanked 21st▼ 9· 2022
- Rail1.21BRanked 21st▼ 9· 2022
- Rail lines (total route-km)48,149.9Ranked 5th—· 2021
- Railways, goods transported (million ton-km)430,170Ranked 5th—· 2021
- Railways, passengers carried (million passenger-km)536Ranked 33rd▼ 18· 2021
- Railways, passengers carried (passenger-km)536MRanked 33rd▼ 18· 2021
- Rate, Domestic currency per international dollar in PPP terms, ICP benchmarks 2017-20211.2Ranked 138th▲ 2· 2031
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate87.3%Ranked 41st▲ 1· 2025
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (modeled ILO estimate)87.3Ranked 41st▲ 1· 2025
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (national estimate)87.8Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2025
- Ratio of inbound to outbound tourist trips0.6Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2024
- Ratio of same-day to overnight tourist arrivals0.5Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202525.2Ranked 95th▼ 6· 2027
- rconna1.44MRanked 14th—· 2019
- rdana1.88MRanked 15th—· 2019
- Real effective exchange rate (broad basket)97.4Ranked 54th▼ 1· 2026
- Real effective exchange rate index (2010 = 100)78.2Ranked 87th▲ 5· 2025
- Real GDP per capita (2011$)44,868.7Ranked 16th—· 2018
- Real GDP per capita in 2011 US$44,868.7Ranked 16th—· 2018
- Real GDP per capita in 2011 US$44,868.7Ranked 16th—· 2018
- Real GDP per capita in 2011 US$44,868.7Ranked 16th—· 2018
- Real GDP per capita in 2011 US$44,868.7Ranked 16th—· 2018
- Real GDP per capita (Maddison, 2011 int$)45,529.6Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Real interest rate (%)0.13Ranked 109th▼ 5· 2017
- Real residential property prices66.8Ranked 16th▼ 9· 2026
- Registered vehicles per 1,000 people665.3Ranked 5th· 2015
- Research and development expenditure (% of GDP)1.8%Ranked 1st▼ 21· 2024
- Researchers in R&D (per million people)5,624.3Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Reserves and related items (BoP, current US$)1.08BRanked 41st▲ 26· 2025
- Return on assets0.79%Ranked 104th▲ 22· 2023
- Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU)619.57BRanked 41st▼ 10· 2024
- Revenue, excluding grants (% of GDP)19.9Ranked 64th▼ 14· 2024
- Revenue, excluding grants (% of GDP)19.9%Ranked 64th▼ 14· 2024
- Revenue from corporate income taxes (% GDP) (ICTD GRD (2019))3.4%Ranked 27th▼ 5· 2017
- Revenue, General government, Domestic currency1.73TRanked 75th—· 2031
- Revenue, General government, Percent of GDP41.7Ranked 33rd—· 2031
- rgdpe1.85MRanked 16th—· 2019
- rgdpna1.87MRanked 16th—· 2019
- rgdpo1.87MRanked 16th—· 2019
- Richest 1%12.1%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2022
- Richest 1%12.1%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2022
- Richest 1%9.1%Ranked 38th▼ 8· 2022
- Richest 10%24.6%Ranked 50th▼ 8· 2022
- Risk premium on lending (lending rate minus treasury bill rate, %)2.2Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2017
- rkna1Ranked 99th▲ 2· 2019
- rnna8.46MRanked 16th—· 2019
- rtfpna1Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2019
- rwtfpna1Ranked 49th▼ 4· 2019
- Saved any money (% age 15+)78.1%Ranked 18th▲ 13· 2021
- Scientific and technical journal articles63,719.9Ranked 10th—· 2023
- SDG indicator 10.4.1: Labour income share as a percent of GDP (%)58.6Ranked 21st—· 2026
- SDG indicator 1.3.1: Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems by sex and function (%)95.6Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2022
- SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (%)35.6Ranked 57th▲ 6· 2021
- SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions -- 19th ICLS (%)35.5Ranked 17th· 2014
- SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US dollars (%)1.4Ranked 122nd▲ 3· 2027
- SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international dollars at PPP (%)1.4Ranked 122nd▲ 3· 2027
- SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training by sex (%)13.3Ranked 29th▼ 26· 2025
- SDG indicator 8.8.1: Fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status5.2Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2023
- SDG indicator 8.8.1: Non-fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status1,347.6Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2023
- SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining0.36Ranked 133rd▲ 3· 2024
- SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment3Ranked 1st—· 2025
- SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (%)8.8Ranked 49th▼ 16· 2025
- SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment -- 19th ICLS (%)8.8Ranked 42nd▼ 10· 2025
- Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$)14.71BRanked 14th▼ 3· 2025
- Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$)15.25BRanked 25th▼ 2· 2025
- Self-employed, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)10.2Ranked 144th—· 2025
- Self-employed, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)15.3Ranked 155th—· 2025
- Self-employed, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)12.9Ranked 150th▼ 1· 2025
- Self-reported life satisfaction6.7Ranked 23rd▲ 5· 2025
- Service exports (BoP, current US$)171.88BRanked 11th▼ 3· 2025
- Service imports (BoP, current US$)169.19BRanked 13th—· 2025
- Services, value added (annual % growth)1.5Ranked 132nd▲ 11· 2025
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$)1.31TRanked 8th—· 2025
- Services, value added (constant LCU)1.84TRanked 64th▼ 1· 2025
- Services, value added (current LCU)1.84TRanked 76th▲ 1· 2022
- Services, value added (current US$)1.41TRanked 7th▼ 2· 2022
- Services, value added (% of GDP)64.1Ranked 52nd▲ 6· 2022
- Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)76,715.4Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2025
- Share agreeing "Most people can be trusted"46.7%Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Share agreeing "Most people can be trusted"46.7%Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Share below $4.20 a day0.3%Ranked 57th▼ 5· 2022
- Share in extreme poverty0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share in vulnerable employment9.6%Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2025
- Share living with diabetes7.7%Ranked 81st▲ 34· 2024
- Share of central government spending funded by taxes70.1%Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of household consumption55.6%Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of one-person households27.6%Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2011
- Share of people who are undernourished2.5%Ranked 83rd—· 2023
- Share of people who report having intentions to start business (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor)14.1Ranked 34th▼ 7· 2017
- Share of people who use tobacco12.1%Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of persons outside the labour force due to care responsibilities by sex (%)1.1Ranked 24th▼ 39· 2025
- Share of persons outside the labour force due to care responsibilities by sex and education (%)1.1Ranked 24th▼ 39· 2025
- Share of temporary employees by sex (%)11.8Ranked 23rd▼ 25· 2025
- Share of the labor force that is female47.2%Ranked 55th—· 2025
- Share of the richest 1%12.1%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of the richest 10%36.8%Ranked 32nd▼ 6· 2022
- Share of total calories from animal protein7.9%Ranked 44th—· 2023
- Share of workers who are employees87%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, female (% of female youth population)12.6Ranked 26th▼ 37· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, female (% of female youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)11.9Ranked 136th▲ 1· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, male (% of male youth population)13.9Ranked 16th▼ 24· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, male (% of male youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)14.1Ranked 91st—· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, total (% of youth population)13.3Ranked 26th▼ 31· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, total (% of youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)13Ranked 124th—· 2025
- Share (richest decile)24.6%Ranked 50th▼ 8· 2022
- Share (top 10%, before tax)36.8%Ranked 32nd▼ 6· 2022
- Share (top 1%, before tax)12.1%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2022
- Share (top 1%, before tax)12.1%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2022
- Share who say they're "happy" or "very happy" (IVS)84.9%Ranked 56th▲ 50· 2022
- Social contributions (current LCU)145.4BRanked 29th▼ 4· 2024
- Social contributions (% of revenue)23.4Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2024
- Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad (current US$)43.43BRanked 8th—· 2024
- Spending by international visitors while visiting a country49.89BRanked 9th▲ 1· 2024
- Spending by international visitors while visiting a country as a share of GDP2.2%Ranked 71st▼ 28· 2024
- S&P Global Equity Indices (annual % change)-14.8Ranked 43rd▲ 23· 2022
- Stocks traded, total value (current US$)2.92TRanked 6th▼ 1· 2025
- Stocks traded, total value (% of GDP)126Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Stocks traded, turnover ratio of domestic shares (%)63.7Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2024
- Structural balance, General government, Domestic currency-62.91BRanked 45th▼ 1· 2031
- Structural balance, General government, Percent-1.5Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2031
- Subsidies and other transfers (current LCU)434.96BRanked 35th▼ 10· 2024
- Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense)68.9Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2023
- Suicide rate8Ranked 98th▲ 20· 2021
- Sustainable fisheries as a proportion of GDP0.06%Ranked 60th—· 2019
- Taxes as a share of cigarette price63.3%Ranked 77th▲ 4· 2022
- Taxes including social contributions34.8%Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2023
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU)202.56BRanked 70th▼ 1· 2025
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$)144.88BRanked 10th—· 2025
- Taxes on goods and services7.6%Ranked 70th▼ 18· 2023
- Taxes on goods and services7.6%Ranked 70th▼ 18· 2023
- Taxes on goods and services (current LCU)85.82BRanked 50th▼ 11· 2024
- Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)13.8Ranked 86th▼ 19· 2024
- Taxes on goods and services (% value added of industry and services)2.9Ranked 113th▼ 6· 2022
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains17.9%Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains (current LCU)334.81BRanked 35th▼ 8· 2024
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains (% of revenue)53.9Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains (% of total taxes)78.5Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Taxes on international trade (current LCU)5.7BRanked 39th▼ 13· 2024
- Taxes on international trade (% of revenue)0.92Ranked 55th▼ 16· 2024
- Tax revenue34.8%Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2023
- Tax revenue as a proportion of GDP (%)14.2Ranked 19th▼ 48· 2024
- Tax revenue as a proportion of GDP (%)14%Ranked 13th▼ 59· 2023
- Tax revenue (current LCU)426.32BRanked 40th▼ 11· 2024
- Tax revenues (% of GDP)34.8%Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2023
- Terms of trade adjustment (constant LCU)65.16BRanked 34th▲ 4· 2025
- Textiles and clothing (% of value added in manufacturing)1Ranked 15th▼ 57· 2024
- Threshold (per day, poorest decile, 2021 prices)31.1Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Threshold (per day, richest decile, 2021 prices)128.9Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Time-related underemployment by sex and education (thousands)312.8Ranked 15th▼ 12· 2025
- Time-related underemployment by sex and marital status (thousands)312.8Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- Time-related underemployment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)312.8Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- Time-related underemployment by sex (thousands)312.8Ranked 15th▼ 12· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex (%)1.5Ranked 30th▼ 35· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex and education (%)1.5Ranked 30th▼ 35· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex and marital status (%)1.5Ranked 24th▼ 18· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex, education and marital status (%)1.5Ranked 24th▼ 19· 2025
- Time required to obtain an operating license (days)9.7Ranked 40th· 2024
- Time required to start a business (days)1.5Ranked 91st▲ 2· 2019
- Time spent dealing with the requirements of government regulations (% of senior management time)6.9Ranked 27th· 2024
- Total alcohol consumption per capita9.9Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2020
- Total daily supply of fat per person163.1Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2023
- Total factor productivity level0.98Ranked 73rd▲ 28· 2023
- Total government revenue (budgetary central government) as a proportion of GDP (%)42Ranked 21st▼ 7· 2023
- Total government revenue, in local currency1.21MRanked 34th▼ 13· 2023
- Total imports as a share of GDP25.7%Ranked 128th—· 2024
- Total investment in Environment Sound Technologies, by sector (current United States dollars)399.89MRanked 3rd· 2020
- Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)4.9%Ranked 70th▼ 28· 2021
- Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)4.9Ranked 70th▼ 28· 2021
- Total official flows (commitments) for Aid for Trade, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)244.3Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2024
- Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)652Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$)125.63BRanked 25th▲ 2· 2025
- Total reserves in months of imports1.6Ranked 77th▼ 51· 2025
- Total reserves in months of imports (ratio)1.6Ranked 102nd▼ 20· 2023
- Total reserves in months of imports (ratio)1.6Ranked 107th▼ 19· 2024
- Total reserves minus gold (current US$)125.63BRanked 18th▼ 1· 2025
- Total tax - OECD32.2%Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2017
- Total tax - OECD32.2%Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2017
- Total trade of tracked Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)68.01BRanked 11th▼ 1· 2024
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)657,286.8Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2027
- Tourism contribution to GDP1.6%Ranked 24th▼ 25· 2023
- Tourism direct GDP as a proportion of total GDP (%)1.8Ranked 12th▼ 28· 2024
- Trade in services (% of GDP)14.7Ranked 71st▼ 35· 2025
- Trade in services (% of GDP)14.7%Ranked 70th▼ 35· 2025
- Trademark applications, nonresident, by count109,335Ranked 4th—· 2021
- Trademark applications, resident, by count66,458Ranked 20th—· 2021
- Trade (% of GDP)63.5%Ranked 86th▼ 23· 2025
- Trade union density rate (%)29.4Ranked 3rd▼ 11· 2020
- Transport services (% of service exports, BoP)9.6Ranked 72nd▼ 46· 2025
- Transport services (% of service imports, BoP)16.7Ranked 82nd▼ 63· 2025
- Travel services (% of service exports, BoP)29.9Ranked 46th▼ 42· 2025
- Travel services (% of service imports, BoP)25.3Ranked 30th▼ 19· 2025
- Trips by domestic tourists per person3.1Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2024
- Trips per capita2Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2019
- Unemployment by sex and categories of unemployed persons (thousands)1,538.9Ranked 49th▼ 16· 2025
- Unemployment by sex and education (thousands)1,538.9Ranked 54th▼ 24· 2025
- Unemployment by sex and marital status (thousands)1,538.9Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Unemployment by sex, duration and marital status (thousands)1,538.9Ranked 26th▼ 22· 2025
- Unemployment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)1,538.9Ranked 26th▼ 23· 2025
- Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)6.6Ranked 108th▲ 11· 2025
- Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (national estimate)6.5Ranked 39th▼ 16· 2025
- Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)7.2Ranked 133rd▲ 8· 2025
- Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (national estimate)7.1Ranked 56th▼ 15· 2025
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex and former economic activity (thousands)1,331.4Ranked 67th▼ 1· 2015
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex and former occupation (thousands)1,322.3Ranked 68th▲ 5· 2014
- Unemployment rate6Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2031
- Unemployment rate6.9%Ranked 123rd▲ 11· 2025
- Unemployment rate, ages 15-2413.8%Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2025
- Unemployment rate by sex and education (%)6.8Ranked 46th▼ 15· 2025
- Unemployment rate by sex and marital status (%)6.8Ranked 24th▼ 19· 2025
- Unemployment rate by sex, education and marital status (%)6.8Ranked 23rd▼ 19· 2025
- Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (national estimate)6.8Ranked 45th▼ 23· 2025
- Unemployment with advanced education, female (% of female labor force with advanced education)5.2Ranked 9th▼ 38· 2025
- Unemployment with advanced education, male (% of male labor force with advanced education)5.5Ranked 12th▼ 47· 2025
- Unemployment with advanced education (% of total labor force with advanced education)5.4Ranked 11th▼ 39· 2025
- Unemployment with basic education, female (% of female labor force with basic education)15.8Ranked 16th▼ 60· 2025
- Unemployment with basic education, male (% of male labor force with basic education)14.7Ranked 16th▼ 60· 2025
- Unemployment with basic education (% of total labor force with basic education)15.1Ranked 15th▼ 61· 2025
- Unemployment with intermediate education, female (% of female labor force with intermediate education)8.4Ranked 10th▼ 43· 2025
- Unemployment with intermediate education, male (% of male labor force with intermediate education)9Ranked 15th▼ 55· 2025
- Unemployment with intermediate education (% of total labor force with intermediate education)8.8Ranked 12th▼ 55· 2025
- Unemployment, youth female (% of female labor force ages 15-24) (modeled ILO estimate)12.1Ranked 84th▼ 2· 2025
- Unemployment, youth female (% of female labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)12.9Ranked 28th▼ 13· 2025
- Unemployment, youth male (% of male labor force ages 15-24) (modeled ILO estimate)15.4Ranked 115th▲ 5· 2025
- Unemployment, youth male (% of male labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)14.7Ranked 40th▼ 17· 2025
- Unemployment, youth total (% of total labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)13.8Ranked 36th▼ 10· 2025
- Usage of improved sanitation facilities98.6%Ranked 57th—· 2024
- Value of global merchandise exports as a share of GDP (Fouquin and Hugot; CEPII 2016; National data)26.6%Ranked 96th▼ 3· 2014
- Value of global merchandise imports as a share of GDP (Fouquin and Hugot; CEPII 2016; National data)28.4%Ranked 128th▼ 9· 2014
- Volume of remittances (in United States dollars) as a proportion of total GDP (%)0.04Ranked 149th▼ 16· 2024
- Volunteer rate by sex and type of volunteer work (%)79.4Ranked 1st· 2018
- Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)8.4Ranked 42nd—· 2025
- Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)10.6Ranked 34th—· 2025
- Wage and salaried workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)89.8Ranked 39th—· 2025
- Wage and salaried workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)84.7Ranked 28th—· 2025
- Wage and salaried workers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)87.1Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2025
- Women of reproductive age14%Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2023
- Women of reproductive age with anemia14%Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2023
- Workers in the reference group by economic activity (thousands)20,334.8Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2023
- Workers in the reference group by sex and migrant status (thousands)17,802.2Ranked 4th—· 2014
- Working-age foreign-born population by sex and country of birth (thousands)10,873.2Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2024
- Working age foreign citizens by sex and country of citizenship (thousands)2,853.7Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2021
- Working-age population by sex and education (thousands)34,569.4Ranked 16th▼ 7· 2025
- Working-age population by sex and labour market status (thousands)34,569.4Ranked 13th▼ 10· 2025
- Working-age population by sex and marital status (thousands)34,569.4Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Working-age population by sex, disability status and labour market status (thousands)29.57MRanked 1st—· 2022
- Working-age population by sex, education and citizenship (thousands)30,335.9Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2021
- Working-age population by sex, education and labour market status (thousands)34,569.4Ranked 13th▼ 10· 2025
- Working-age population by sex, education and marital status (thousands)34,569.4Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Working-age population by sex, education and place of birth (thousands)33,819.2Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2024
- Working-age population by sex, marital status and labour market status (thousands)34,569.4Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Working-age population with vocational education or training by sex and education (thousands)12,750.2Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2025
- Working hours per worker1,731Ranked 89th▲ 1· 2023
- xr1.3Ranked 120th—· 2019
- Yearly per capita supply of all meat94.8Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fruit112.2Ranked 47th▲ 5· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetable oils27.5Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetables114.5Ranked 78th▲ 10· 2023
- Unemployment rate (ILO modelled)7.3%Ranked 128th▲ 2· 2027
- Youth unemployment rate (ILO modelled)14%Ranked 101st▼ 2· 2027
- Labour force participation rate64%Ranked 71st▲ 1· 2027
- Employment-to-population ratio59.3%Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2027
- Total factor productivity (current PPPs, USA=1)0.85Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2019
- Human capital index3.7Ranked 7th—· 2019
- Capital stock per worker436,689.3Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2019
Life expectancy
- Life expectancy82.1Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2024
- Infant mortality4.7Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2024
- Maternal mortality12Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2023
- Health spending11.3%Ranked 4th▼ 9· 2024
- Physicians2.8Ranked 20th▼ 35· 2023
- Basic sanitation access98.6%Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2024
- Basic drinking water access98.3%Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2024
- Undernourishment2.5%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Measles immunization92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence6.2Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2024
- Road traffic deaths5.3Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2019
- Suicide mortality rate9.4Ranked 119th▼ 7· 2021
- Smoking prevalence11.2%Ranked 29th▼ 5· 2024
- PM2.5 air pollution exposure6.6Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- Child mortality0.54Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Daily caloric supply per capita3,590Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- 0-140.47Ranked 68th▲ 22· 2021
- 0-27 days probability of death0.3%Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2019
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 15–197.8Ranked 21st▲ 6· 2022
- 15–19 years10.4Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2022
- 15–19 years5Ranked 22nd▲ 10· 2022
- 15–19 years7.8Ranked 21st▲ 6· 2022
- 15-19 years old, current drinkers (%)54.9Ranked 39th—· 2019
- 15-19 years old heavy episodic drinkers (drinkers only), %43.4Ranked 102nd· 2016
- 15-19 years old heavy episodic drinkers (population), % with 95%CI33.2Ranked 12th· 2010
- 15-19 years old heavy episodic drinkers (population), % with 95%CI22.4Ranked 44th▲ 32· 2016
- 15-19 years old total alcohol consumption in litres of pure alcohol12.4Ranked 24th· 2010
- 15-19 years old total alcohol consumption in litres of pure alcohol12.4Ranked 24th· 2010
- 15-19 years old total alcohol consumption in litres of pure alcohol - Sex: both sexes12.4Ranked 24th· 2010
- 15-years old any alcoholic beverage consumed in past 12 months, (%)61.2Ranked 20th▲ 18· 2011
- 15-years old any alcoholic beverage consumed in past 12 months, (%)61.2Ranked 20th▲ 18· 2011
- 15-years old first drink at 13 years or younger, (%)23Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2014
- 15-years old first drink at 13 years or younger, (%)33Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2010
- 20–249.3Ranked 66th▲ 18· 2021
- 20–24 years1.7Ranked 50th▼ 8· 2022
- 5-14 years0.11Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2021
- 70+ years148.5Ranked 10th▼ 6· 2021
- Access antibiotics10.5Ranked 41st▲ 6· 2023
- Adequate stool collection0%Ranked 39th▼ 18· 2023
- Adult mortality rate (probability of dying between 15 and 60 years per 1000 population)72.3Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2021
- Adult obesity27.1%Ranked 82nd—· 2024
- Adults (ages 15-49) newly infected with HIV1,700Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2022
- Adults (ages 15+) and children (ages 0-14) newly infected with HIV1,900Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2022
- Adult T-cell leukemia and lymphoma100%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Affordability - percentage of GDP per capita required to purchase 2000 cigarettes of the most sold brand2Ranked 129th▼ 5· 2022
- Age-standardized98Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized79.1Ranked 52nd▼ 7· 2022
- Age-standardized cervical cancer incidence rate per 100,000 women6.6Ranked 149th· 2022
- Age-standardized DALYs, alcohol use disorders, per 100,000596Ranked 26th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, breast cancer, per 100,000172Ranked 34th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, cerebrovascular disease, per 100,000211Ranked 173rd· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, colon and rectum cancers, per 100,000154Ranked 23rd· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, diabetes mellitus, per 100,000341Ranked 114th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, drownings, per 100,00020Ranked 134th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, falls, per 100,00085Ranked 119th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, fires, per 100,00017Ranked 118th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, ischaemic heart disease, per 100,000495Ranked 161st· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, liver cancer, per 100,00028.1Ranked 140th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, liver cirrhosis, per 100,00077Ranked 131st· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, mouth and oropharynx cancer, per 100,00027Ranked 78th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, oesophagus cancer, per 100,00029Ranked 64th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, other unintentional injuries, per 100,000151Ranked 166th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, poisoning, per 100,00056Ranked 70th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, prematurity and low birth rate, per 100,00087Ranked 149th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, road traffic accidents, per 100,000260Ranked 153rd· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, self-inflicted injury, per 100,000253Ranked 52nd· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, violence, per 100,00073Ranked 129th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rate from cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, endocarditis among both sexes3.1Ranked 40th▼ 8· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes79.4Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from hypertensive heart disease among both sexes3.7Ranked 17th—· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from ischaemic heart disease among both sexes44.7Ranked 25th▲ 3· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from rheumatic heart disease among both sexes0.68Ranked 58th▲ 5· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from self-harm among both sexes8Ranked 95th▼ 20· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from self-harm among males12Ranked 92nd▼ 19· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from snakebite envenoming0.01Ranked 1st· 2019
- Age-standardized death rate from stroke among both sexes14.6Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from tuberculosis among both sexes0.15Ranked 14th▼ 3· 2021
- Age-standardized death rates (15+ years), alcoholic liver disease, per 100,0003.8Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2005
- Age-standardized death rates (15+ years), poisoning, per 100,0003.5Ranked 34th—· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates (15+ years), violence, per 100,0002Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, alcohol use disorders, per 100,0001.6Ranked 17th—· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, breast cancer, per 100,00012Ranked 69th▼ 52· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, cerebrovascular disease, per 100,00025.7Ranked 2nd· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, colon and rectum cancers, per 100,00015.4Ranked 87th▼ 54· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, diabetes mellitus, per 100,00014.8Ranked 41st· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, drownings, per 100,0000.8Ranked 6th▼ 15· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, falls, per 100,0003.6Ranked 33rd▼ 12· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, fires, per 100,0000.5Ranked 5th▼ 22· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, ischaemic heart disease, per 100,00074.2Ranked 31st· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, liver cancer, per 100,0003.1Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, liver cirrhosis, per 100,0005.3Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, mouth and oropharynx cancer, per 100,0002.5Ranked 14th▼ 14· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, oesophagus cancer, per 100,0003.3Ranked 26th▼ 63· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, other unintentional injuries, per 100,0005.9Ranked 20th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, poisoning, per 100,0002.4Ranked 23rd▼ 51· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, prematurity and low birth rate, per 100,0001.7Ranked 13th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, road traffic accidents, per 100,0008.1Ranked 20th▼ 9· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, self-inflicted injury, per 100,00010.7Ranked 71st▼ 47· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, violence, per 100,0001.4Ranked 12th▼ 21· 2004
- Age-standardized deaths from bladder cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people2.2Ranked 31st▼ 10· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from brain and nervous system cancers in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people3.9Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from breast cancer in females in those aged all ages per 100,000 people13.1Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from cervix uteri cancer in females in those aged all ages per 100,000 people1.4Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from colon and rectum cancers in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people10.3Ranked 31st▼ 12· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from liver cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people4.2Ranked 24th▼ 12· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from maternal conditions in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people0.08Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from pancreas cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people7Ranked 31st▼ 14· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from prostate cancer in males in those aged all ages per 100,000 people10.7Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths from stomach cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people2.4Ranked 8th▼ 9· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from cardiovascular diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages79.1Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from diabetes mellitus, blood and endocrine disorders per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages13.5Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from digestive diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages17.8Ranked 28th▼ 3· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from infectious and parasitic diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages5.6Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from malignant neoplasms per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages98Ranked 33rd▼ 10· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from maternal conditions per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages0.08Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from respiratory diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages19.7Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized deaths that are from respiratory infections per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages25.4Ranked 15th▲ 9· 2022
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)8Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)0Ranked 1st· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)8Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Age-standardized NCD mortality rate (per 100 000 population)309.8Ranked 24th▲ 4· 2021
- Age-standardized prevalence of current tobacco use among persons aged 15 years and older, by sex (%) - Both sexes12%Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2022
- Age-standardized suicide rates (per 100 000 population)8.1Ranked 95th▲ 22· 2021
- AIDS-related deaths189.1Ranked 59th▲ 2· 2022
- Alcohol1,505.7Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2021
- Alcohol, 15-19 years heavy continuous drinkers, drinkers only, past year (%)5.4Ranked 59th· 2019
- Alcohol, 15-19 years heavy continuous drinkers past year (%)2.9Ranked 33rd· 2019
- Alcohol, abstainers lifetime (%), age-standardized14.2Ranked 146th▲ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, abstainers past 12 months (%), age-standardized30.8Ranked 148th▼ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, abstainers past 12 months (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes30.8%Ranked 148th▼ 1· 2020
- Alcohol-attributable all-cause deaths (all ages), (number)13,145.1Ranked 150th· 2019
- Alcohol-attributable DALYs lost from all causes (all ages), (number)543,386Ranked 36th· 2019
- Alcohol-attributable fractions, all-cause deaths (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: Total (All ages)4.7%Ranked 108th· 2019
- Alcohol, average daily intake in grams among drinkers, three-year average31Ranked 48th▼ 9· 2020
- Alcohol, consumers past 12 months (%)77.1Ranked 4th· 2010
- Alcohol, consumers past 12 months (%), age-standardized69.2Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, consumers past 12 months (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes69.2%Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, consumption of pure alcohol by type of beverage (%) - Beverage types: Beer44.3%Ranked 77th—· 2019
- Alcohol, consumption of pure alcohol by type of beverage (%) - Beverage types: Spirits26%Ranked 90th—· 2019
- Alcohol, consumption of pure alcohol by type of beverage (%) - Beverage types: Wine25.7%Ranked 49th—· 2019
- Alcohol, drinkers only per capita (15+)consumption in litres of pure alcohol13.2Ranked 99th▲ 13· 2010
- Alcohol, drinkers only per capita (15+) consumption in litres of pure alcohol, three-year average14.3Ranked 48th▼ 9· 2020
- Alcohol expenditure as a per cent of total household expenditure1.9Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2014
- Alcohol expenditure as a per cent of total household expenditure1.2Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2016
- Alcohol, former drinkers (%), age-standardized16.6Ranked 58th—· 2020
- Alcohol, heavy continuous drinkers, drinkers only, past year (%)10Ranked 60th· 2019
- Alcohol, heavy continuous drinkers past year (%)7Ranked 37th· 2019
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+), drinkers only, past 30 days (%)23.1Ranked 12th· 2010
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+), drinkers only, past 30 days (%), age-standardized36.2Ranked 113th▼ 6· 2020
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+), drinkers only, past 30 days (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes36.2%Ranked 113th▼ 6· 2020
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+) past 30 days (%), age-standardized28.3Ranked 50th▼ 3· 2020
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (population) past 30 days (%)17.8Ranked 8th· 2010
- Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue0.8Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2013
- Alcoholic excise tax revenue as a per cent of government revenue0.8Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2013
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), by beverage type - Beverage types: Beer3.1Ranked 52nd▲ 8· 2022
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), by beverage type - Beverage types: Wine1.9Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2022
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average8.2Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2010
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average8.2Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2010
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average7.5Ranked 48th—· 2024
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average with 95%CI8.2Ranked 28th· 2010
- Alcohol-related road traffic crashes (% of all traffic crashes)18.9Ranked 2nd—· 2010
- Alcohol-related road traffic crashes, per 100,000 population9Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2006
- Alcohol-related road traffic crashes with fatalities (% of all road traffic crashes with fatalities)38.4Ranked 1st· 2010
- Alcohol-related road traffic crashes with fatalities (% of all road traffic crashes with fatalities)38.4Ranked 1st· 2010
- Alcohol, total per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) (SDG Indicator 3.5.2), three-year average9.2Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- Alcohol, total per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI8.9Ranked 33rd· 2018
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)10.2Ranked 26th▼ 5· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)10.2Ranked 26th▼ 5· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI10.2Ranked 26th· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI10.2Ranked 26th· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption, projected estimates for 201610.1Ranked 29th· 2012
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption, projected estimates for 201610.1Ranked 29th· 2012
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption, projections10Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2030
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption with 95%CI, projections to 202510.7Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2025
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption with 95%CI, projections to 202510.7Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2025
- Alcohol, tourist consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average-0.04Ranked 94th—· 2024
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)1.9Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2015
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)1.9Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2015
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average1.8Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI2Ranked 19th· 2010
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI2Ranked 19th· 2010
- All cases of new TB79Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2023
- All malignant cancers combined2.2Ranked 33rd▼ 16· 2022
- Annual budget for tobacco control in currency reported70.83MRanked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Annual mortality rate (ages 65+)28.3Ranked 25th· 2011
- Annual revenues from alcohol excise tax in millions US$5,252.2Ranked 3rd—· 2013
- Annual revenues from alcohol excise tax in millions US$4,884.9Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2015
- Annual tax revenues - import duties and all other taxes (excluding corporate taxes on tobacco companies)14.91MRanked 48th· 2020
- Annual tax revenues - total excise (specific and ad valorem)7.16BRanked 11th▼ 11· 2022
- Antenatal care coverage - at least four visits (%)98.9Ranked 3rd· 2007
- Antenatal care coverage - at least four visits (%)98.9%Ranked 3rd· 2007
- Antenatal care coverage - at least one visit (%)100Ranked 1st· 2007
- Antiretroviral therapy coverage for PMTCT (% of pregnant women living with HIV)92Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2009
- Antiretroviral therapy coverage for PMTCT (% of pregnant women living with HIV)92%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2009
- Antiretroviral therapy coverage (% of people living with HIV)76Ranked 19th▲ 4· 2022
- Antiretroviral therapy coverage (% of people living with HIV)76%Ranked 19th▲ 4· 2022
- Attribution of road traffic deaths to alcohol (%)29.6%Ranked 62nd· 2017
- Availability of estimates on impoverishment due to out-of-pocket health expenditures1Ranked 1st—· 2010
- Availability of estimates on large health expenditures as a share of total expenditure or income1Ranked 1st—· 2010
- Availability of national list of approved medical devices for procurement or reimbursement0Ranked 1st· 2010
- Availability of national standards or recommended lists of medical devices0Ranked 1st· 2010
- Availability of technical specifications of medical devices to support procurement or donations0Ranked 1st· 2010
- Average daily intake in grams of alcohol, population (15+)21.5Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2020
- Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version, 1st edition100Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Average per capita alcohol consumption (15-19 year old males)18.3Ranked 24th· 2010
- Average price 500 mls Beer in US$3.5Ranked 23rd· 2016
- Average price 500 mls Spirits in US$20.8Ranked 13th· 2016
- Average price 750 mls Wine in US$12Ranked 23rd· 2016
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - ad valorem excise0Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - import duties0Ranked 16th▲ 6· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - other taxes0Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - specific excise55.6Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - total tax64.5Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - value added tax8.8Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2014
- Bans on tobacco advertising4Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- BCG immunized, coverage among 1-year-olds (%)92Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Beds for mental health in general hospitals (per 100,000)14.5Ranked 4th· 2017
- Beds in mental hospitals (per 100,000)11.1Ranked 11th· 2017
- Biomedical engineers density (per 10 000 population)0.18Ranked 39th▲ 5· 2017
- Births attended by skilled health personnel (%)97.8Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2023
- Births attended by skilled health staff (% of total)98%Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2020
- Births attended by skilled health staff (% of total)98Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2020
- Births by caesarean section (%)27.9Ranked 13th· 2015
- Bladder2.2Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2022
- Both sexes8Ranked 98th▲ 20· 2021
- Breast6%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Cancer and neoplasms25.2%Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- Cancers98Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2022
- Cancer survival for those diagnosed with breast cancer, 5-year net survival (%)89.3Ranked 15th· 2021
- Cardiovascular diseases death rate79.4Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2021
- Case detection rate (all forms)100%Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2024
- Case fatality ratio (percentage)4%Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2024
- Cases started on MDR-TB treatment16Ranked 92nd▲ 8· 2016
- Cause of death, by communicable diseases and maternal, prenatal and nutrition conditions (% of total)8.4Ranked 7th▼ 19· 2021
- Cause of death, by injury (% of total)5.5Ranked 67th▲ 10· 2021
- Cause of death, by non-communicable diseases (% of total)86.1Ranked 178th▲ 17· 2021
- Cause of death, by other COVID-19 pandemic-related outcomes (% of total)0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Cautions and arrests for drink-driving, per 100,000 population265.9Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2013
- Central death rate at 250.08Ranked 69th▼ 2· 2023
- Central death rate at 651.1Ranked 29th▼ 9· 2023
- Change in female height (%)4%Ranked 135th· 1996
- Change in female height (cm)6.3Ranked 135th· 1996
- Change in male height (%)4.3%Ranked 131st· 1996
- Change in male height (cm)7.4Ranked 129th· 1996
- Change in maternal mortality ratio since 19900%Ranked 156th▲ 155· 2015
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported9.6Ranked 78th· 2020
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in PPP$8Ranked 26th· 2020
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates7.2Ranked 17th· 2020
- Chemical events100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Child deaths age 1 to 4257Ranked 67th▼ 1· 2024
- Child deaths from rotavirus1Ranked 2nd· 2016
- Child mortality (per 1000 live births)0.9Ranked 32nd—· 2100
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.01Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.5%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.49%Ranked 42nd—· 2023
- Child mortality rate0.01Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.49%Ranked 42nd—· 2023
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.59%Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- Child mortality rate from rotavirus0.1Ranked 2nd· 2016
- Child mortality rate (full)0.54%Ranked 47th—· 2024
- Children aged <5 years wasted for age (%)1.1Ranked 1st· 1972
- Children orphaned due to AIDS4,743.8Ranked 76th—· 2022
- Cholera case fatality rate0Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2016
- Cholera case fatality rate0%Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2020
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) diagnosis coverage as a percentage of infected (%)71Ranked 4th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infected persons diagnosed (number)153,722Ranked 18th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) treatment rate as percentage of diagnosed (%)12Ranked 24th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) treatment rate as percentage of total infected (%)8Ranked 8th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) cumulative treatment rate as percentage of total infected, including cured (%)40Ranked 11th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) diagnosis coverage as percentage of total HCV infected, including cured (%)91Ranked 5th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infected persons diagnosed, including cured (number)191,286Ranked 8th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infected persons diagnosed (number)112,299Ranked 9th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) treatment rate as percentage of diagnosed (%)43Ranked 22nd· 2022
- Cigarette consumption per smoker per day27.6Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2012
- Circulating Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus (cVDPV) cases0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Civil registration coverage of cause-of-death (%)99.8Ranked 21st▲ 6· 2011
- CME_ARR_10T19-0.4Ranked 56th· 2021
- CME_ARR_SBR0.6Ranked 38th· 2023
- CME_ARR_U5MR-0.2Ranked 65th· 2023
- CME_MRM03.4Ranked 149th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_MRM1T111.3Ranked 152nd▼ 1· 2024
- CME_MRM1T592Ranked 157th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY04.7Ranked 149th▼ 3· 2024
- CME_MRY10T140.63Ranked 155th▼ 4· 2024
- CME_MRY10T192.3Ranked 158th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY15T191.7Ranked 154th▲ 4· 2024
- CME_MRY15T244.6Ranked 143rd▲ 2· 2024
- CME_MRY1T40.71Ranked 155th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY20T242.9Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY5T141.1Ranked 160th▼ 2· 2024
- CME_MRY5T245.7Ranked 147th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY5T90.45Ranked 161st▼ 3· 2024
- CME_PND0.63Ranked 40th▲ 6· 2024
- CME_SB1,016Ranked 95th▼ 1· 2023
- CME_SBR2.8Ranked 162nd—· 2023
- CME_TMM01,223Ranked 93rd▲ 2· 2024
- CME_TMM1T11469Ranked 97th—· 2024
- CME_TMM1T59726Ranked 99th—· 2024
- CME_TMY01,692Ranked 92nd▼ 6· 2024
- CME_TMY0T41,949Ranked 94th▼ 3· 2024
- CME_TMY10T14268Ranked 89th▼ 3· 2024
- CME_TMY10T191,002Ranked 79th▼ 3· 2024
- CME_TMY15T19734Ranked 77th▼ 2· 2024
- CME_TMY15T242,169Ranked 76th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY1T4257Ranked 92nd▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY20T241,435Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T14450Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2024
- CME_TMY5T242,619Ranked 79th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T9182Ranked 94th▼ 3· 2024
- Completeness of cause-of-death data (%)100Ranked 11th· 2015
- Compliance of ban on advertising on billboards and outdoor advertising10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on advertising on local magazines and newspapers10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on advertising on national TV and radio10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on appearance of tobacco brands in TV and/or films (product placement)10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on free distribution of tobacco products in the mail or through other means10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on promotional discounts10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in GOVERNMENT FACILITIES10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on sponsored events10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance with ban on advertising in local magazines and newspapers (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on advertising on national television and radio (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on appearance of tobacco brands in TV and/or films (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Compliance with ban on billboard and outdoor advertising (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Compliance with ban on free distribution in mail or through other means (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on promotional discounts (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on sponsorship (contributions and/or publicity of contributions) (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with bans on direct advertising10Ranked 1st—· 2014
- Compliance with bans on promotion and sponsorship10Ranked 1st—· 2014
- Compliance with international health regulations100Ranked 1st—· 2016
- Compliance with regulations on smoke-free environments (national legislation)10Ranked 1st—· 2014
- Compliance with smoke-free education facilities except universities law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free government facilities law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free health-care facilities law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free public transport law (score)9Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free pubs and bars law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free restaurants law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free universities law (score)9Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Condom use among men who have sex with men17.2%Ranked 29th▼ 11· 2018
- Confirmed cases of MDR-TB9Ranked 82nd▲ 3· 2012
- Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB (%)89Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2012
- Confirmed cases of RR-/MDR-TB30Ranked 94th▼ 3· 2024
- Confirmed tetanus cases (WHO)5Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases0Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2025
- Congenital syphilis number of cases, reported53Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2023
- Congenital syphilis rate per 100 000 live births, reported14.5Ranked 30th▲ 6· 2023
- Cost of a healthy diet4.4Ranked 63rd▼ 10· 2024
- Cost of a nutrient adequate diet2.3Ranked 70th· 2021
- Coverage of people living with HIV receiving ART76.2%Ranked 44th▲ 5· 2022
- Cumulative maternal under-five offspring mortality among mothers aged 20-44 as a rate per 1000 mothers in the age group0.93Ranked 20th· 2016
- Current health expenditure (CHE) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)11.2Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2023
- Current health expenditure (CHE) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)11.2%Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2023
- Current health expenditure (CHE) per capita in US$6,186.7Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita (current US$)6,378Ranked 9th▼ 6· 2024
- Current health expenditure per capita (int-$)7,645.9Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2024
- Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)7,645.9Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2024
- Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)7,645.9Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2024
- DALYs from all causes among both sexes10.89MRanked 53rd▲ 1· 2021
- DALYs from all causes, among both sexes per 100,000 people28,546.5Ranked 147th▲ 8· 2021
- DALYs from drug use disorders, among both sexes per 100,000 people1,323.6Ranked 2nd—· 2021
- Death rate due to road traffic injuries, by sex (per 100,000 population)4.7Ranked 20th· 2021
- Death rate from alcohol use disorders among both sexes4Ranked 117th▼ 2· 2021
- Death rate from alzheimer disease and other dementias among both sexes80.7Ranked 174th▼ 2· 2021
- Death rate from amphetamine use disorders among both sexes1.3Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2021
- Death rate from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes196.7Ranked 100th—· 2021
- Death rate from cocaine use disorders among both sexes2.2Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2021
- Death rate from diabetes mellitus among both sexes15.5Ranked 62nd▼ 5· 2021
- Death rate from diarrhoeal diseases among both sexes1.8Ranked 63rd▼ 7· 2021
- Death rate from drowning among both sexes0.78Ranked 23rd▼ 8· 2021
- Death rate from drug use disorders among both sexes19.2Ranked 114th—· 2021
- Death rate from falls among both sexes18.5Ranked 165th▼ 7· 2021
- Death rate from fire, heat and hot substances among both sexes0.59Ranked 31st▲ 6· 2021
- Death rate from HIV/AIDS among both sexes0.37Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2021
- Death rate from lower respiratory infections among both sexes11.3Ranked 26th▼ 20· 2021
- Death rate from malaria among both sexes0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Death rate from malignant neoplasms among both sexes224.7Ranked 159th▲ 5· 2021
- Death rate from meningitis among both sexes0.19Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2021
- Death rate from mental and substance use disorders among both sexes23.7Ranked 159th▲ 7· 2021
- Death rate from opioid use disorders among both sexes14.7Ranked 95th▲ 6· 2021
- Death rate from parkinson disease among both sexes9.4Ranked 148th▼ 5· 2021
- Death rate from poisoning0.3Ranked 24th▲ 4· 2021
- Death rate from road injury among both sexes4.7Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2021
- Death rate from self-harm among both sexes9.4Ranked 117th▼ 9· 2021
- Death rate from substance use disorders among both sexes23Ranked 189th▲ 1· 2021
- Death rate from tuberculosis among both sexes0.32Ranked 13th—· 2021
- Death rate in men99.5Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2022
- Deaths caused by chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection (number)445Ranked 58th· 2022
- Deaths caused by chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection (number)2,692Ranked 122nd· 2022
- Deaths due to HIV/AIDS (per 100 000 population)1.1Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2012
- Deaths due to tuberculosis among HIV-negative people (per 100 000 population)0.21Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Deaths due to tuberculosis among HIV-negative people (per 100 000 population)0.21Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Deaths from cardiovascular diseases per 100,000 people in both sexes aged all ages200.7Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2022
- Deaths from snakebite envenoming1Ranked 1st· 2019
- Deaths from trachea, bronchus, lung cancers per 100,000 people in males aged all ages51.6Ranked 35th▼ 11· 2022
- Deaths prevented by rotavirus vaccine0Ranked 1st· 2016
- Defined daily doses of antibiotics and antituberculosis drugs used per 1,000 inhabitants per day14.5Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2023
- Density of outpatient health centres (per 100,000 population)692Ranked 10th· 2017
- Density of residential long-term care facilities (per 100,000 population)11,610Ranked 3rd· 2017
- Dental Assistants and Therapists (number)27,375Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Dental Prosthetic Technicians (number)2,600Ranked 6th· 2018
- Dental prosthetic technicians (per 10 000 population)0.69Ranked 30th· 2019
- Dentists (number)24,909Ranked 19th▲ 4· 2020
- Dentists (per 10,000)6.5Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2020
- Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79)7.7Ranked 81st▲ 34· 2024
- Digestive diseases4.4%Ranked 25th▲ 10· 2022
- Diphtheria - number of reported cases5Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2025
- Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis (DTP3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)92Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis first-dose (DTP1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC)92Ranked 8th—· 2025
- DM_BRTS361.1Ranked 65th—· 2025
- DM_BRTS_SURVIVING_1451.5Ranked 50th—· 2100
- DM_DPR_CHD23.1Ranked 175th▲ 1· 2025
- DM_DPR_OLD31.3Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2025
- DM_DPR_TOT54.4Ranked 115th▼ 7· 2025
- DM_FRATE_TOT1.3Ranked 190th▲ 3· 2025
- DM_LIFE_EXP82.9Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2025
- DM_NET_MG_RATE8.1Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2025
- DM_POP_15TO244,632.6Ranked 56th—· 2025
- DM_POP_ADLCNT4,313Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2025
- DM_POP_ADLCNT_PROP10.8Ranked 177th—· 2025
- DM_POP_CHILD_PROP18.3Ranked 179th▼ 2· 2025
- DM_POP_GRT0.9Ranked 99th▲ 2· 2025
- DM_POP_TOT40,126.7Ranked 38th—· 2025
- DM_POP_U187,323.3Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2025
- DM_POP_U51,891.9Ranked 64th—· 2025
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)70.3Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of general government expenditure (GGE) (%)18.7Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of general government expenditure (GGE) (%)18.7%Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)7.9Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) per capita in US$4,349.8Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)70.2%Ranked 3rd▼ 46· 2024
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)70.2Ranked 3rd▼ 46· 2024
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP)7.9%Ranked 1st▼ 15· 2024
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP)7.9Ranked 1st▼ 15· 2024
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of general government expenditure)17.8Ranked 2nd▼ 15· 2024
- Domestic general government health expenditure per capita (current US$)4,476.9Ranked 3rd▼ 14· 2024
- Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)5,366.9Ranked 3rd▼ 14· 2024
- Domestic government5,366.9Ranked 3rd▼ 14· 2024
- Domestic private health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)29.8Ranked 5th▼ 118· 2024
- Domestic private health expenditure per capita (current US$)1,901.1Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2024
- Domestic private health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)2,279.1Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2024
- Domestic private health expenditure (PVT-D) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)29.7Ranked 123rd▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure (PVT-D) per capita in US$1,836.8Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Donor commitments (Million, constant 2009 US$)522.6Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2010
- Donor disbursements (Million, constant 2009 US$)394.4Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2010
- Drug use disorders7,333.1Ranked 4th—· 2021
- DTP3 immunized, coverage among 1-year-olds (%)83Ranked 17th—· 2024
- ECON_GVT_EDU_EXP_PTEXP11.1Ranked 123rd· 2024
- ECON_GVT_EDU_EXP_PTGDP4.1Ranked 89th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_EXP_PTGDP21.2Ranked 38th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_HLTH_EXP_PTEXP19.2Ranked 16th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_HLTH_EXP_PTGDP8Ranked 19th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_REV_PTGDP14.4Ranked 119th· 2024
- ECON_ODA_OUTFLOW_PTGNI0.26Ranked 16th· 2024
- ECON_ODA_OUTFLOW_USD9,274.1Ranked 6th· 2024
- ECON_SOC_PRO_EXP_PTEXP0Ranked 107th· 2024
- ED_MAT_L169Ranked 19th· 2019
- ED_MAT_L283.7Ranked 8th· 2018
- ED_READ_L195.7Ranked 20th· 2016
- ED_READ_L286.2Ranked 5th· 2018
- ED_ROFST_L02_ADM1.7Ranked 47th· 2019
- ED_ROFST_L1_ADM0.28Ranked 51st· 2019
- ED_ROFST_L2_ADM0.07Ranked 9th· 2015
- ED_ROFST_L3_ADM11.9Ranked 30th· 2019
- Environmental and Occupational Health and Hygiene Professionals (number)1,708Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2020
- Escherichia coli190.7Ranked 30th▼ 9· 2023
- Estimated antiretroviral therapy coverage among people living with HIV (%)76Ranked 19th▲ 4· 2022
- Estimated direct deaths from major conflicts (per 100 000 population)0.02Ranked 46th· 2016
- Estimated HIV in incident tuberculosis2.8%Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2024
- Estimated incidence of all forms of tuberculosis6.2Ranked 121st▼ 4· 2024
- Estimated maternal deaths40.9Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal deaths40.9Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Estimated mortality from all forms of tuberculosis per 100,000 population0.23Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2024
- Estimated number of deaths from all forms of tuberculosis93Ranked 37th▼ 8· 2024
- Estimated number of deaths from all forms of tuberculosis93Ranked 37th▼ 8· 2024
- Estimated number of MDR/RR-TB incident cases41Ranked 86th—· 2024
- Estimated number of new cases of all forms of tuberculosis2,500Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2024
- Estimated number of people (all ages) living with HIV65,000Ranked 42nd—· 2022
- Estimated number of pregnant women living with HIV needing antiretrovirals for preventing mother-to-child transmission200Ranked 50th▲ 6· 2022
- Estimated number of road traffic deaths1,805Ranked 102nd· 2021
- Estimated polio cases0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Estimated population-based prevalence of depression4.7Ranked 76th· 2015
- Estimated road traffic death rate (per 100 000 population)4.7Ranked 20th· 2021
- Estimate of current cigarette smoking prevalence (%)6.2Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2030
- Estimate of current cigarette smoking prevalence (%) (age-standardized)6.7Ranked 95th▲ 1· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco smoking prevalence (%)8.3Ranked 105th▲ 8· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco smoking prevalence (%) (age-standardized)8.9Ranked 101st▲ 6· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%)8.3Ranked 109th▲ 8· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) (age-standardized)8.9Ranked 107th▲ 9· 2030
- Estimates of number of homicides605Ranked 107th—· 2019
- Estimates of rates of homicides per 100 000 population1.6Ranked 46th—· 2021
- Exclusive breastfeeding under 6 months (%)14.4Ranked 20th▲ 10· 2007
- Expenditure on HIV prevention and treatment0Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2022
- Exports of beer (barley) in 1000s hectolitres3.1Ranked 63rd▲ 4· 2009
- Exports of spirits in 1000s hectolitres692Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2006
- Exports of wine (grape) in 1000s hectolitres30Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2007
- Extensively drug-resistant0Ranked 35th▲ 3· 2019
- External health expenditure (EXT) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)0Ranked 147th▼ 1· 2023
- External health expenditure (EXT) per capita in US$0Ranked 146th▼ 1· 2023
- External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)0Ranked 2nd▼ 145· 2024
- External health expenditure per capita (current US$)0Ranked 2nd▼ 144· 2024
- External health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)0Ranked 2nd▼ 145· 2024
- Female life expectancy at birth84.8Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth84.8Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth84.8Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Females150.6Ranked 4th—· 2021
- Females1,781Ranked 4th—· 2021
- Females1,427.6Ranked 3rd—· 2021
- Females2,114.1Ranked 5th—· 2021
- Females83.2Ranked 5th—· 2021
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Financing100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- First dose only, girls86%Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2024
- Food safety100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Gender inequality index rank25Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2014
- Generalist medical practitioners (number)52,959Ranked 5th▼ 8· 2024
- GN_FB_BNK_ACCSS100Ranked 1st—· 2021
- GN_IDX17.5Ranked 84th· 2023
- GN_SG_LGL_GENEQEMP90Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Government expenditures on mental health as a percentage of total government expenditures on health (%)7.2Ranked 9th· 2011
- Gross national income per capita (Atlas method)43,250Ranked 15th· 2010
- Health emergency management93Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Health services provision100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Health technology (medical device) national policy0Ranked 1st· 2010
- Health worker density, by type of occupation (per 10,000 population) - Dentists6.5Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2020
- Health worker density, by type of occupation (per 10,000 population) - Pharmacists11.4Ranked 5th▼ 13· 2023
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at age 60 (years)18.5Ranked 15th—· 2021
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years)69.8Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2021
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years) - Sex: both sexes69.8Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2021
- Heavy episodic drinking (youth 15 -19 years), drinkers only, past 30 days (%)47.1Ranked 115th▲ 13· 2019
- Heavy episodic drinking (youth 15 -19 years) past 30 days (%)25.8Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2019
- Height (Baten and Blum 2015)179.6Ranked 6th▼ 2· 1980
- Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)83Ranked 17th—· 2025
- Hepatitis, deaths caused by chronic hepatitis B and C (per 100 000 population)8.1Ranked 40th· 2022
- Hib (Hib3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)90Ranked 10th—· 2025
- HIV-positive11Ranked 88th▲ 1· 2024
- Homicide rate in both sexes in all ages per 100,000 population0.8Ranked 22nd▼ 17· 2022
- Hospital beds (per 10 000 population)25.4Ranked 62nd▼ 6· 2022
- Hospital beds (per 1,000 people)2.5Ranked 57th▼ 9· 2022
- Hospital beds (per 1,000 people)2.5Ranked 57th▼ 9· 2022
- Hospital discharges, alcoholic liver disease, per 100,00015Ranked 15th—· 2004
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for cigarette packaging?16Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for other smoked tobacco packaging?16Ranked 4th—· 2022
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for smokeless tobacco packaging?4Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2022
- HPV immunization coverage estimates among primary target cohort (9-14 years old girls) (%)86Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2025
- HPV Vaccination coverage by age 15, last dose, females86%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, female (scale 0–50)47.4Ranked 43rd▼ 2· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, male (scale 0–50)45.9Ranked 37th—· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, total (scale 0–50)46.7Ranked 39th▲ 2· 2025
- Human development index rank9Ranked 148th▲ 4· 2014
- Human height179.6Ranked 6th▼ 2· 1980
- Human resources80Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- HVA_PED_LOST240,000Ranked 56th▲ 3· 2022
- HVA_PED_LOST_AIDS4,700Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2022
- Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, age-standardized22.1Ranked 133rd▲ 3· 2019
- Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude27.6Ranked 123rd▼ 10· 2019
- Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%)77.8Ranked 4th—· 2019
- Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)79.6Ranked 4th—· 2019
- Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%)60.7Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)62.4Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%)73.3Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)76.1Ranked 1st—· 2019
- ICD-11 implementation progress level1Ranked 3rd· 2019
- ICT Development Index (IDI)7.4Ranked 18th—· 2012
- ICT Development Index (IDI) rank20Ranked 138th—· 2012
- IHR Coordination, National IHR Focal Point functions and advocacy100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Ill-defined causes in cause-of-death registration (%)5.1Ranked 4th· 2013
- IM_MCV279Ranked 21st—· 2025
- Immunization, DPT (% of children ages 12-23 months)92Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Immunization, HepB3 (% of one-year-old children)83Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Imports in 1000s hectolitres2.6Ranked 100th▲ 3· 2007
- Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC)92Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Incidence of HIV, ages 15-24 (per 1,000 uninfected population ages 15-24)0.1Ranked 55th▼ 5· 2022
- Incidence of HIV, ages 15-49 (per 1,000 uninfected population ages 15-49)0.1Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2022
- Incidence of HIV, all (per 1,000 uninfected population)0.1Ranked 52nd▼ 3· 2022
- Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100 000 population) (HIV-positive cases)0.17Ranked 100th▲ 1· 2023
- Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100 000 population per year)6.2Ranked 117th▼ 5· 2024
- Incidence rate of lip and oral cavity cancer (per 100 000 population)4.2Ranked 20th· 2020
- Increase in mean male height (%)4.3%Ranked 131st· 1996
- Inequality in life expectancy0.04Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Inequality in life expectancy (Atkinson index)0.04Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Infant deaths1,692Ranked 93rd▲ 6· 2024
- Infant mortality0.47Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2024
- Infant mortality rate0.47%Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2024
- Infant mortality rate0.43%Ranked 46th▲ 1· 2024
- Infant mortality rate0.43%Ranked 44th—· 2023
- Infant mortality rate0.51%Ranked 48th▲ 4· 2024
- Infection prevention and control (IPC)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%)96Ranked 4th· 2024
- Invasive non-pneumonia, non-meningitis2Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2015
- Japanese encephalitis - number of reported cases0Ranked 9th· 2006
- Laboratories providing drug susceptibility testing (DST) (per 5 million population)1.5Ranked 45th▲ 4· 2008
- Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture (per 5 million population)1.5Ranked 76th▲ 2· 2008
- Laboratory100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Latest year of wild polio case1,979Ranked 30th· 2023
- Leprosy - New leprosy cases with G2D rate per 1 000 000 population0Ranked 88th▲ 3· 2024
- Leprosy - Number of cases registered for treatment3Ranked 82nd▲ 1· 2024
- Leprosy - Number of new leprosy cases among children (less than 15 years of age)0Ranked 41st▼ 2· 2024
- Leprosy registered prevalence rate per 1 000 000 population0.08Ranked 119th▲ 10· 2024
- Life expectancy82Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2020
- Life expectancy82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at 154.3Ranked 128th▲ 49· 2023
- Life expectancy at 1591.9Ranked 22nd—· 2100
- Life expectancy at 453.7Ranked 126th▲ 59· 2023
- Life expectancy at 8011.1Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at age 60 (years)24.8Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2021
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth91.7Ranked 23rd—· 2100
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth84.8Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth1.1Ranked 164th▲ 50· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth1.1Ranked 164th▲ 50· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth4.4Ranked 139th▲ 55· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth4.4Ranked 139th▲ 55· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth4.4Ranked 139th▲ 55· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth80.4Ranked 26th▼ 10· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth (years)81.6Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2021
- Life expectancy at birth (years) - Sex: both sexes81.6Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2021
- Lifespan inequality0.08Ranked 43rd▼ 11· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (%)0.01Ranked 51st▲ 4· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (%)0.01%Ranked 51st▲ 4· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (1 in: rate varies by country)6,911Ranked 137th—· 2023
- Liver cirrhosis, age-standardized death rates (15+), per 100,000 population6.8Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2004
- Lives saved due to ART1,942.8Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2022
- Long-run childhood stunting rates2.1%Ranked 24th▲ 6· 1975
- Low-birthweight babies (% of births)6.6Ranked 125th—· 2020
- Low-birthweight babies (% of births)6.6%Ranked 125th—· 2020
- Low birth weight number (in thousands)24.5Ranked 61st▲ 2· 2020
- Low birth weight prevalence (%)6.6Ranked 80th▲ 2· 2020
- Male12.1Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2022
- Male life expectancy at birth80.4Ranked 26th▼ 10· 2023
- Male life expectancy at birth80.4Ranked 26th▼ 10· 2023
- Male-to-female height ratio1.1Ranked 21st—· 1996
- Male to female suicide death rate ratio3Ranked 75th▲ 17· 2021
- Maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Maternal mortality ratio (national estimate, per 100,000 live births)9.4Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2023
- Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)11.8Ranked 53rd▲ 4· 2023
- Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)11.8Ranked 53rd▲ 4· 2023
- Mean BMI (kg/m²)26.6Ranked 37th—· 2016
- Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age27.3Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2016
- Mean female height (cm)163.9Ranked 39th—· 1996
- Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized1.4Ranked 3rd—· 2018
- Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized - Sex: both sexes1.4Ranked 3rd—· 2018
- Mean HDL cholesterol, crude1.4Ranked 3rd—· 2018
- Mean hemoglobin level of children aged 6-59 months122Ranked 4th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years)132Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years)120Ranked 4th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years)132Ranked 4th—· 2019
- Mean male height (cm)178.1Ranked 27th—· 1996
- Mean male height (cm)178.1Ranked 27th—· 1996
- Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized3.2Ranked 10th—· 2018
- Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized - Sex: both sexes3.2Ranked 10th—· 2018
- Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude3.3Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2018
- Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized4.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2018
- Mean total cholesterol, crude4.7Ranked 7th—· 2018
- Measles-containing-vaccine first-dose (MCV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)92Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) immunization coverage by the nationally recommended age (%)79Ranked 21st—· 2025
- Measles - number of reported cases147Ranked 72nd▼ 21· 2024
- Measles - number of reported cases5,072Ranked 18th▼ 55· 2025
- Measles second-dose coverage79%Ranked 21st—· 2024
- Medical and Pathology Laboratory scientists (number)19,757Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2020
- Medical doctors not further defined (number)89,911Ranked 9th· 2018
- Medical doctors (number)113,435Ranked 5th▼ 17· 2024
- Medical doctors (per 10,000)28.5Ranked 16th▼ 34· 2024
- Men11.7%Ranked 121st▼ 12· 2021
- Men23.4%Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2022
- Men15.6Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2019
- Men178.1Ranked 27th—· 1996
- Men24.6Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2022
- Men110.7Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2022
- Mental health outpatient facilities (per 100,000)0.33Ranked 12th· 2017
- Mental health units in general hospitals (per 100,000)0.4Ranked 6th· 2017
- Mental health units in general hospitals (per 100,000)0.4Ranked 6th· 2017
- Mental hospitals (per 100,000)0.06Ranked 10th· 2017
- Men who have sex with men: Condom use (percent)17.2Ranked 29th▼ 11· 2018
- Men who have sex with men: Population size estimate (number)432,000Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Men who have sex with men: Syphilis prevalence (percent)2.2Ranked 13th▼ 7· 2019
- MG_INTNL_MG_CNTRY_DEST8.81MRanked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- MG_RFGS_CNTRY_ASYLM_PER100010Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2025
- MG_RFGS_CNTRY_ASYLM_PER_USD_GNI10Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2025
- Midwifery personnel (number)1,706Ranked 55th▼ 5· 2020
- MNCH_CSEC26.3Ranked 17th· 2007
- MNCH_INSTDEL98.4Ranked 13th—· 2011
- MNCH_LIFE_EXPECTANCY84.8Ranked 16th· 2022
- MNCH_LTR_MATERNAL_DEATH6,911Ranked 137th—· 2023
- MNCH_MATERNAL_DEATHS42Ranked 72nd▼ 6· 2023
- MNCH_MMR11.8Ranked 141st▼ 5· 2023
- MNCH_UHC92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- MNCH_UHC_RMNCH92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Mobile-cellular telephone subscriptions per 100 inhabitants80.1Ranked 119th· 2012
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70 (%)9.7%Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70 (%)9.7Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70, female (%)7.7Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70, male (%)11.7Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2021
- Mortality rate among children ages 10 to 14 years (per 1000 children aged 10)0.52Ranked 29th—· 2020
- Mortality rate attributed to exposure to unsafe WASH services (per 100 000 population) (SDG 3.9.2)2.3Ranked 11th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution, age-standardized, female (per 100,000 female population)6.3Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution, age-standardized, male (per 100,000 male population)10.1Ranked 4th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution, age-standardized (per 100,000 population)8.1Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female (per 100,000 female population)0.25Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, male (per 100,000 male population)0.35Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100 000 population)0.3Ranked 63rd▲ 14· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100,000 population)0.3Ranked 32nd▲ 9· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population)0.3Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population) - Both sexes0.3Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene from diarrhoea, intestinal nematode infections, malnutrition and acute respiratory infections (deaths per 100,000 population)2.3Ranked 27th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene (per 100,000 population)2.3Ranked 11th· 2019
- Mortality rate, neonatal (per 1,000 live births)3.4Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5, female (per 1,000 live births)5Ranked 26th—· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5, male (per 1,000 live births)5.9Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000 live births)5.4Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported12.9Ranked 92nd▼ 5· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in PPP$10.8Ranked 27th▲ 5· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates9.6Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - ad valorem excise0Ranked 52nd—· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - import duties0Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - other taxes0Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - specific excise0.53Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - total tax0.62Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - value added tax0.09Ranked 16th—· 2020
- Mumps - number of reported cases52Ranked 59th▲ 9· 2025
- National guidelines, policies or recommendations on the procurement of medical devices0Ranked 1st· 2010
- National smoking ban: NUMBER OF PLACES SMOKE-FREE8Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Natural population growth rate0.11%Ranked 155th▼ 7· 2023
- Neonatal deaths1,223Ranked 81st▼ 5· 2024
- Neonatal deaths1,223Ranked 81st▼ 5· 2024
- Neonatal deaths1,113Ranked 94th▼ 6· 2019
- Neonatal mortality rate0.34%Ranked 48th▼ 1· 2024
- Neonatal mortality rate (per 1000 live births) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 0-27 days0.34Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2023
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2025
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases per million0Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2024
- New and relapse cases79%Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2023
- New cases: other0Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2012
- New cases: pulmonary smear-negative464Ranked 102nd▼ 7· 2012
- New cases: pulmonary smear unknown/not done110Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2012
- New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)90Ranked 11th▼ 17· 2024
- New chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections (number)98Ranked 103rd· 2022
- New chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infections (number)663Ranked 83rd· 2022
- New HIV infections1,851.3Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2022
- New HIV infections (per 1000 uninfected population)0.1Ranked 52nd▼ 2· 2022
- New infections of HIV per 1,000 people0.09Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2022
- New leprosy case detection rate per 1 000 000 population0.08Ranked 116th▲ 3· 2024
- New leprosy child case detection rate (less than 15 years of age) per 1 000 000 child population0Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2024
- New or unknown treatment history cases: Pulmonary, bacteriologically confirmed751Ranked 114th▲ 1· 2022
- Non-HDL cholesterol3.2Ranked 10th—· 2018
- Non-polio AFP rate0.36Ranked 119th▼ 7· 2023
- NT_ANE_WOM_15_49_MOD14Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2023
- NT_ANT_WHZ_PO2_MOD11.4Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2024
- NT_ANT_WHZ_PO2_MOD_NUMTH213.7Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2024
- NT_BW_LBW6.6Ranked 124th▲ 1· 2020
- NT_BW_WEI96.6Ranked 18th▲ 17· 2020
- NT_DANT_BMI_G25_MOD59.2Ranked 71st▲ 1· 2022
- NT_DANT_BMI_G30_MOD_ADJ26.2Ranked 72nd▲ 1· 2022
- NT_DANT_BMI_L18_MOD1.8Ranked 145th▲ 6· 2022
- Number of biomedical engineers642Ranked 22nd· 2017
- Number of biomedical technicians1Ranked 26th· 2017
- Number of children aged 6-59 months with anaemia (thousands)262Ranked 86th▼ 2· 2019
- Number of children who die before age 51,753Ranked 99th—· 2023
- Number of children who die before age 51,753Ranked 99th—· 2023
- Number of children who die before age 51,753Ranked 99th—· 2023
- Number of clinical trials527Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Number of current cigarette smokers, estimate2.19MRanked 44th▲ 5· 2030
- Number of current of tobacco users, estimate2.92MRanked 46th▲ 3· 2030
- Number of current tobacco smokers, estimate2.92MRanked 41st▲ 4· 2030
- Number of daily smokers - both (IHME, GHDx (2012))4.16MRanked 31st▲ 1· 2012
- Number of deaths ages 10-14 years268Ranked 72nd▲ 1· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 15-19 years734Ranked 100th▲ 2· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 20-24 years1,435Ranked 103rd▼ 8· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 5-9 years182Ranked 58th▼ 7· 2024
- Number of deaths among children ages 10 to 14 years220Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2021
- Number of deaths due to tuberculosis, excluding HIV82Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2024
- Number of deaths rate due to road traffic injuries1,805Ranked 102nd· 2021
- Number of female leprosy new cases0Ranked 62nd▼ 7· 2024
- Number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency100Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases2,500Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2024
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases, (HIV-positive cases)70Ranked 77th▼ 7· 2024
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases in children aged 0 - 14150Ranked 83rd· 2024
- Number of infant deaths1,692Ranked 94th▲ 6· 2024
- Number of infant deaths - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 0 to 11 months1,576%Ranked 83rd▼ 2· 2023
- Number of infants361,541Ranked 65th—· 2023
- Number of infants who die before age 11,524Ranked 97th—· 2023
- Number of infants who die before age 1385Ranked 85th—· 2100
- Number of isolates tested for azithromycin3,130Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Number of isolates tested for cefixime3,122Ranked 2nd—· 2018
- Number of isolates tested for ceftriaxone3,130Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Number of isolates tested for ciprofloxacin3,123Ranked 3rd—· 2018
- Number of isolates tested for extended-spectrum cephalosporins3,122Ranked 3rd—· 2018
- Number of labour days needed to buy annual supply of fluoride toothpaste per person0.09Ranked 71st· 2019
- Number of licensed qualified anaesthesiologists actively working3,186Ranked 3rd· 2013
- Number of licensed qualified obstetricians actively working3,070Ranked 3rd· 2013
- Number of licensed qualified surgeons actively working7,489Ranked 8th· 2013
- Number of maternal deaths42Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2023
- Number of maternal deaths42Ranked 101st▼ 1· 2023
- Number of maternal deaths42Ranked 101st▼ 1· 2023
- Number of neonatal deaths1,223Ranked 81st▼ 5· 2024
- Number of neonatal deaths1,223Ranked 82nd▼ 5· 2024
- Number of new cases of lip and oral cavity cancer2,993Ranked 18th· 2020
- Number of new G2D leprosy cases0Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Number of new HIV infections1,900Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2022
- Number of new HIV infections1,900Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2022
- Number of new HIV infections per 1,000 uninfected population, by sex and age (per 1,000 uninfected population)0.05Ranked 100th▼ 3· 2022
- Number of new leprosy cases3Ranked 81st—· 2024
- Number of new leprosy cases3Ranked 81st—· 2024
- Number of new leprosy cases with G2D among children (less than 15 years of age)0Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of non-autochthonous leprosy cases0Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who are not vaccinated against rotavirus48,353.1Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not been vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae type b37,194.7Ranked 67th▲ 3· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not been vaccinated against rubella29,755.8Ranked 57th▼ 5· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the inactivated polio vaccine29,755.8Ranked 67th—· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the measles vaccine29,755.8Ranked 71st▼ 7· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine55,792.1Ranked 51st▼ 2· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the third dose of the polio vaccine29,755.8Ranked 73rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine29,755.8Ranked 70th—· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine63,231Ranked 49th▼ 3· 2023
- Number of people dying from HIV-related causes200Ranked 52nd▲ 1· 2022
- Number of people requiring interventions against neglected tropical diseases (number)4Ranked 154th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of people who cannot afford a healthy diet1.2MRanked 71st▼ 6· 2024
- Number of people who cannot afford nutrient adequacy1MRanked 64th· 2021
- Number of pigs in the country13.97MRanked 10th—· 2020
- Number of prevalent tuberculosis cases2,300Ranked 85th▼ 4· 2014
- Number of reported cases of cholera1Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2016
- Number of reported cases of poliomyelitis by wild poliovirus (WPV)0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Number of reported deaths from cholera0Ranked 1st—· 2016
- Number of smoke-free public places8Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Number of surgical procedures (per 100,000 population)6,928Ranked 1st· 2021
- Number of under-five deaths1,949Ranked 88th▼ 5· 2024
- Number of under-five deaths1,949Ranked 87th▼ 5· 2024
- Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)11.3Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2023
- Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)11.3Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2023
- Nurses working in mental health sector (per 100,000)68.7Ranked 2nd· 2017
- Nursing and midwifery personnel (number)461,742Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Nursing and midwifery personnel (per 10,000)116.2Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2024
- Nursing personnel (number)461,742Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age26%Ranked 80th▲ 2· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: female - Age group: 18+ years of age24.4%Ranked 107th▲ 3· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age27.5%Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age27.1%Ranked 82nd—· 2024
- Obesity in men27.5%Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Opioids5,601.7Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2021
- Out-of-pocket expenditure as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)15.2Ranked 141st▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of current health expenditure)15.3Ranked 9th▼ 132· 2024
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of current health expenditure)15.3%Ranked 9th▼ 132· 2024
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) per capita in US$940.6Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita (current US$)974.4Ranked 4th▼ 8· 2024
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)1,168.1Ranked 6th▼ 12· 2024
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)1,168.1Ranked 6th▼ 12· 2024
- Overall compliance with bans on direct advertising (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Overall compliance with bans on promotion and sponsorship (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Overall compliance with regulations on smoke-free environments (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Overweight among children and adolescents, BMI-for-age > +1 standard deviations above the median (crude estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 5-19 years of age28.3%Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2024
- Overweight in men63.7%Ranked 60th▲ 1· 2024
- Overweight numbers among children under 5 years of age (thousands), model-based estimates213.7Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), model-based estimates11.4Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), model-based estimates - Sex: both sexes11.4%Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), survey-based estimates10.4Ranked 4th· 2004
- People living with chronic hepatitis B (HBV) (number)215,840Ranked 78th· 2022
- People living with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) including cured (all ages) (adjusted number)209,367Ranked 37th· 2022
- People living with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) (number)130,380Ranked 55th· 2022
- People practicing open defecation (% of population)0Ranked 104th▼ 3· 2024
- People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population)0Ranked 89th▼ 4· 2024
- People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population)0Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)98.5Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of urban population)98.3Ranked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural population)98.8Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2024
- People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban population)98.6Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2024
- People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population)96.9Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2024
- People using safely managed sanitation services (% of population)81.3Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- People using safely managed sanitation services, rural (% of rural population)81.6Ranked 18th—· 2024
- People using safely managed sanitation services, urban (% of urban population)81.2Ranked 31st—· 2024
- People who inject drugs: Population size estimates (number)90,000Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2021
- Per capita availability of refined sugar (g/day)94.5Ranked 45th· 2019
- Per capita current health expenditure in PPP (oral health)5.5Ranked 184th· 2019
- Per capita expenditure on dental healthcare (US$)342.5Ranked 9th· 2019
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)23.4Ranked 58th· 2022
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)23.4%Ranked 57th· 2022
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)21%Ranked 54th· 2022
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)21Ranked 55th· 2022
- Percentage of individuals using the Internet86.8Ranked 12th· 2012
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of cigarette packaging75Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of other smoked tobacco packaging75Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of smokeless tobacco packaging50Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of cigarette packaging75Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of other smoked tobacco packaging75Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of smokeless tobacco packaging50Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of cigarette packaging75Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of other smoked tobacco packaging75Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of smokeless tobacco packaging50Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Persons initiated chronic hepatitis C(HCV) treatment (number)6,843Ranked 15th· 2022
- Persons on chronic hepatitis B (HBV) treatment (number)18,006Ranked 16th· 2022
- Persons on chronic hepatitis C (HCV) treatment, cumulative (number)83,144Ranked 11th· 2022
- Pertussis - number of reported cases1,939Ranked 21st▲ 11· 2025
- Pharmaceutical Technicians and Assistants (number)9,913Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2020
- Pharmacists (number)46,334Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2024
- Pharmacists (per 10,000)11.7Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2024
- Physicians (per 1,000 people)2.8Ranked 20th▼ 35· 2023
- Physiotherapists (number)29,657Ranked 5th▼ 9· 2024
- Pneumoccocal conjugate vaccines (PCV3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)85Ranked 15th—· 2025
- Points of entry (PoEs) and border health100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Policy and legal instruments to implement IHR70%Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Policy, Legal and normative Instruments to implement IHR70Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Poliomyelitis - number of reported cases0Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2018
- Polio (Pol3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)92Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Population34.02MRanked 35th· 2010
- Pregnant women receiving prenatal care (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2007
- Pregnant women receiving prenatal care (%)100Ranked 1st· 2007
- Pregnant women with anemia15.1%Ranked 135th▲ 5· 2023
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported14.9Ranked 97th· 2020
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in international dollars12.5Ranked 24th· 2020
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates11.1Ranked 10th· 2020
- Preterm birth (number)29,384Ranked 40th—· 2020
- Preterm birth rate (per 100 live births)7.9Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2020
- Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%)13.2Ranked 152nd▲ 4· 2019
- Prevalence of anemia among children (% of children ages 6-59 months)13.2%Ranked 152nd▲ 4· 2019
- Prevalence of anemia among children (% of children ages 6-59 months)13.2Ranked 152nd▲ 4· 2019
- Prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women (% of women ages 15-49)14Ranked 134th▼ 6· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%)15.1Ranked 135th▲ 5· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%)15.1%Ranked 135th▲ 5· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49)14Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2023
- Prevalence of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) ) in the general population (%)0.3Ranked 26th· 2022
- Prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adolescents (%)3Ranked 33rd· 2019
- Prevalence of current e-cigarette use among adolescents (%)11.1Ranked 16th· 2019
- Prevalence of current smokeless tobacco use among adolescents (%)0.6Ranked 18th· 2019
- Prevalence of current tobacco use among adolescents (%)8Ranked 19th· 2019
- Prevalence of current tobacco use, females (% of female adults)8.7Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2024
- Prevalence of current tobacco use, males (% of male adults)13.7Ranked 133rd▲ 8· 2024
- Prevalence of daily cigarette smoking among adolescents (%)1Ranked 7th· 2019
- Prevalence of daily e-cigarette use among adolescents (%)2Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Prevalence of edentulism in people 20+ years (%)7.7Ranked 91st· 2019
- Prevalence of HIV among adults aged 15 to 49 (%)0.1Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2022
- Prevalence of HIV, female (% ages 15-24)0.1Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2022
- Prevalence of HIV, male (% ages 15-24)0.1Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2022
- Prevalence of HIV, total (% of population ages 15-49)0.1Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2022
- Prevalence of hypertension in adults aged 30-7922.1Ranked 133rd▲ 3· 2019
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, female (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)10.6Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, male (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)12.1Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)11.4Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height (% of children under 5)10.4Ranked 4th· 2004
- Prevalence of severe periodontal disease in people 15+ year (%)24.7Ranked 37th· 2019
- Prevalence of untreated caries of deciduous teeth in children 1-9 years (%)38.9Ranked 150th· 2019
- Prevalence of untreated caries of permanent teeth in people 5+ years (%)25.1Ranked 182nd· 2019
- Prevalence of zinc deficiency (Wessells et al. (2012))8%Ranked 110th▼ 5· 2005
- preventable deaths from rotavirus1Ranked 2nd· 2016
- Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)88Ranked 13th▼ 30· 2024
- Primary data availability for UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1) (%)77Ranked 7th· 2023
- Primary health care expenditure (PHCE) per сapita in US$2,616.8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Private health expenditure per person2,279.1Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2024
- Probability of dying among adolescents ages 10-14 years (per 1,000)0.6Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2024
- Probability of dying among adolescents ages 15-19 years (per 1,000)1.7Ranked 72nd▲ 1· 2024
- Probability of dying among children ages 5-9 years (per 1,000)0.5Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2024
- Probability of dying among youth ages 20-24 years (per 1,000)2.9Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2024
- Procurement of medical devices carried out at the national level0Ranked 1st· 2010
- Production in 1000s hectolitres30.5Ranked 73rd▼ 3· 2005
- Proportion of all cancer deaths among all individuals attributable to alcohol consumption3.3%Ranked 33rd· 2020
- Proportion of all cancers but non-melanoma skin cancer (c00-97, but c44) cases among all individuals attributable to helicobacter pylori1.1%Ranked 169th· 2020
- Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (%)97.8Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of births delivered in a health facility (Facility births) (%)97.8Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (%)17.5Ranked 71st▲ 12· 2023
- Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (%)18.3Ranked 59th▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics (%)85.6Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2015
- Proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading (%)89.3Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2015
- Proportion of children moderately or severely overweight (%) - Both sexes11.4%Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance (DS/R) to cefixime reported to WHO-GASP0.54Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2018
- Proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance (DS/R) to ceftriaxone reported to WHO-GASP1.4Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2020
- Proportion of isolates with decreased susceptibility or resistance (DS/R) to extended-spectrum cephalosporins reported to WHO-GASP0.54Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2018
- Proportion of isolates with resistance to azithromycin reported to WHO-GASP6.1Ranked 23rd▼ 9· 2020
- Proportion of isolates with resistance to ciprofloxacin reported to WHO-GASP55.6Ranked 29th▼ 12· 2018
- Proportion of population below the international poverty line of US$1.90 per day (%)0.5Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2013
- Proportion of population with large household expenditures on health (greater than 10%) as a share of total household expenditure or income (%)3.5%Ranked 25th▼ 10· 2019
- Proportion of population with large household expenditures on health (greater than 25%) as a share of total household expenditure or income (%)0.8%Ranked 19th▼ 7· 2019
- Proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3) vaccine (%)92Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Proportion of the target population who received a 3rd dose of pneumococcal conjugate (PCV3) vaccine (%)85Ranked 15th—· 2024
- Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%)79Ranked 21st—· 2024
- Proportion of the target population who received the final dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (%)86Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Psychiatrists working in mental health sector (per 100,000)14.7Ranked 3rd· 2017
- Psychologists working in mental health sector (per 100,000)48.7Ranked 2nd· 2017
- Public expenditure on health per capita (current international $)5,366.9Ranked 3rd▼ 14· 2024
- Public health expenditure as a share of GDP8.1%Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2025
- PV_VMIR0.74Ranked 1st· 2013
- Radiation emergencies100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) (age-standardized estimate) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age5.5Ranked 84th▼ 2· 2014
- Reported cases of chlamydia (number)116,474Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Reported cases of gonorrhea (number)35,956Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Reported cases of guinea worm disease in humans0Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Reported cases of syphilis (number)18,979Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Reported cholera cases2Ranked 22nd▼ 4· 2020
- Reported cholera deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Reported number of human rabies deaths1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Reported number of human rabies deaths1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Reported number of people receiving antiretroviral therapy49,814Ranked 52nd▲ 4· 2022
- Reported number of people requiring interventions against NTDs4Ranked 154th▼ 4· 2024
- Reported number of people requiring interventions against NTDs4Ranked 154th▼ 4· 2024
- Reported road accident deaths1,768Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2021
- Reported Smallpox cases (WHO)0Ranked 45th▼ 6· 1952
- Reported Smallpox cases (WHO)0Ranked 45th▼ 6· 1952
- Reporting countries1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Residential long-term care beds (per 10 000 population)340,911Ranked 6th· 2017
- Retreatment cases: other33Ranked 74th▼ 11· 2012
- Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive)0Ranked 85th—· 2007
- Retreatment cases: treatment after failure (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive)0Ranked 76th▼ 5· 2007
- Rheumatic heart disease629Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2021
- Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE)100Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)0.1Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Risk of impoverishing expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)0%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Risk of impoverishing expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Rotavirus vaccines completed dose (RotaC) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)87Ranked 13th—· 2025
- Rubella - number of reported cases0Ranked 54th—· 2025
- Sales of beer in 1000s hectolitres23.1Ranked 76th▼ 8· 2009
- Sales of spirits in 1000s hectolitres2.1Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2009
- Sales of wine in 1000s hectolitres4.4Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2009
- School life expectancy in primary education, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 53rd▲ 4· 2023
- SDG 3.9.2 WASH deaths856Ranked 84th· 2019
- SDG 6.3.1 Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)68.3Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2024
- Self-reported life satisfaction6.7Ranked 23rd▲ 5· 2025
- Service Capacity Index for Substance Use Disorders (SCI-SUD)55.1Ranked 25th· 2019
- Share of adult men that are overweight66.8%Ranked 53rd—· 2024
- Share of adults12.1%Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age58.4%Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: female - Age group: 18+ years of age53.1%Ranked 109th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age63.7%Ranked 60th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)12.1%Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of children fully vaccinated against measles79%Ranked 21st—· 2024
- Share of children fully vaccinated against measles79%Ranked 21st—· 2024
- Share of children with an active hepatitis B infection1%Ranked 58th· 2015
- Share of female adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)9.5%Ranked 59th▼ 2· 2022
- Share of male adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)14.6%Ranked 123rd▲ 5· 2022
- Share of men14.6%Ranked 123rd▲ 5· 2022
- Share of men with HIV0.1%Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2022
- Share of mothers aged 20-44 who have lost an infant0.83Ranked 62nd· 2016
- Share of new all cancers but non-melanoma skin cancer (c00-97, but c44) cases among all individuals attributable to all infectious agents3.6%Ranked 178th· 2020
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae type b90%Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against rotavirus87%Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against rubella92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had one dose of the measles vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had one dose of the measles vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the one dose of the inactivated polio vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine85%Ranked 15th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine85%Ranked 15th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine83%Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine83%Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the polio vaccine92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Share of population covered by health insurance100%Ranked 1st· 2011
- Share of population covered by health insurance (ILO (2014))100%Ranked 1st· 2011
- Share of the population who cannot afford a healthy diet3%Ranked 110th▼ 9· 2024
- Share of the population who cannot afford nutrient adequacy2.5%Ranked 112th· 2021
- Share of the target elderly population vaccinated against influenza70.4%Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2021
- Share of total deaths in both sexes in those aged all ages that are from ill-defined diseases5.3%Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2022
- Share that agrees vaccines are effective77%Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Share that agrees vaccines are important for children78%Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2023
- Share that agrees vaccines are safe74%Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2023
- Share that disagrees vaccines are safe18%Ranked 30th▼ 10· 2023
- Share that disagree that vaccines are effective16%Ranked 27th▼ 14· 2023
- Share that disagree that vaccines are important for children to have14%Ranked 23rd▼ 13· 2023
- Skilled health professionals density (per 10 000 population)123.8Ranked 15th▲ 13· 2015
- Smear-positive tuberculosis case-detection rate (%)87Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2008
- Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%)62Ranked 36th▲ 13· 2011
- Social workers working in mental health sector (per 100,000)145.4Ranked 1st· 2017
- Specialist medical practitioners (number)60,476Ranked 2nd▼ 13· 2024
- Specialist surgical workforce (per 100,000 population)43.9Ranked 7th▼ 25· 2016
- Spirits, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) 2.2Ranked 48th▲ 4· 2022
- SPP_CHLD_SOC_PROT100Ranked 1st· 2024
- SPP_GDPPC53,371.7Ranked 26th· 2024
- SPP_GINI31.7Ranked 30th· 2024
- SPP_HSLD_INCOME_SHARE7.7Ranked 25th· 2024
- SPP_MOTHERS_CASH_BNF96.9Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- SPP_PALMA1.2Ranked 103rd· 2024
- SPP_VMI0.74Ranked 1st· 2013
- Standard drink measures, in grams per unit13.6Ranked 3rd· 2010
- Standard drink measures, in grams per unit13.6Ranked 3rd· 2010
- Statin use314.3Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Statin use314.3Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Stillbirth rate0.28%Ranked 161st—· 2023
- Stillbirth rate (per 1000 total births)2.8Ranked 162nd—· 2023
- Suicide mortality rate, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population)9.4Ranked 68th▼ 7· 2021
- Suicide mortality rate, female (per 100,000 female population)4.8Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2021
- Suicide mortality rate, male (per 100,000 male population)14.2Ranked 113th▼ 19· 2021
- Suicide rate8Ranked 98th▲ 20· 2021
- Support to help quit smoking5Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Surveillance100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Tax structure: Excise tax proportion of price54.5Ranked 57th—· 2022
- TB patients with known HIV status (%)48Ranked 39th—· 2024
- Tested TB patients HIV-positive (%)2.3Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2024
- Tobacco tax structure: Price dispersion: Share of cheapest brand price in premium brand price (%) (the higher the % the smaller the gap)69.7Ranked 50th· 2022
- Total alcohol consumption per capita9.9Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2020
- Total alcohol consumption per capita, female (liters of pure alcohol, projected estimates, female 15+ years of age)4.3Ranked 26th▼ 4· 2020
- Total alcohol consumption per capita (liters of pure alcohol, projected estimates, 15+ years of age)9.9Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2020
- Total alcohol consumption per capita, male (liters of pure alcohol, projected estimates, male 15+ years of age)15.6Ranked 27th▼ 8· 2020
- Total deaths from alcohol use disorders among both sexes1,505.7Ranked 176th▲ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from all causes among both sexes307,991Ranked 158th▼ 3· 2021
- Total deaths from alzheimer disease and other dementias among both sexes30,787.2Ranked 181st▲ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes75,034.1Ranked 156th▲ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes75,034.1Ranked 156th▲ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from dengue among both sexes0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Total deaths from diabetes mellitus among both sexes5,902.1Ranked 151st▼ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from diarrhoeal diseases among both sexes678.7Ranked 118th▼ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from drowning among both sexes295.7Ranked 112th▼ 4· 2021
- Total deaths from drug use disorders among both sexes7,333.1Ranked 181st▼ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from falls among both sexes7,058.4Ranked 178th—· 2021
- Total deaths from fire, heat and hot substances among both sexes223.4Ranked 114th▲ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from HIV/AIDS among both sexes140.4Ranked 78th▲ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from lower respiratory infections among both sexes4,308.2Ranked 113th▼ 11· 2021
- Total deaths from malaria among both sexes0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Total deaths from malignant neoplasms among both sexes85,725.5Ranked 169th▲ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from meningitis among both sexes71.9Ranked 94th▼ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from mental and substance use disorders among both sexes9,047.5Ranked 187th▲ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from parkinson disease among both sexes3,586.7Ranked 175th—· 2021
- Total deaths from poisonings among both sexes114.2Ranked 118th▲ 4· 2021
- Total deaths from road injury among both sexes1,805Ranked 102nd▼ 7· 2021
- Total deaths from self-harm among both sexes3,603.6Ranked 168th▼ 3· 2021
- Total deaths from stroke among both sexes14,244.4Ranked 137th—· 2021
- Total deaths from substance use disorders among both sexes8,838.8Ranked 187th▲ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from tuberculosis among both sexes120.5Ranked 77th▼ 1· 2021
- Total dementia hospital admissions (per 100,000)144,003Ranked 4th· 2017
- Total density per 100 000 population: District/rural hospitals0.85Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2013
- Total density per 100 000 population: Hospitals2.3Ranked 33rd· 2013
- Total density per 100 000 population: Provincial hospitals1.3Ranked 18th—· 2013
- Total density per 100 000 population: Specialized hospitals0.13Ranked 58th▲ 13· 2013
- Total density per million females aged from 50 to 69 years old: Mammography units134.5Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Total density per million population: Computed tomography units14.8Ranked 4th▼ 22· 2021
- Total density per million population: Gamma camera or Nuclear medicine15.6Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Total density per million population: Linear Accelerator7.6Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2013
- Total density per million population: Magnetic Resonance Imaging10.3Ranked 5th▼ 21· 2021
- Total density per million population: Positron Emission tomography1.5Ranked 11th▼ 20· 2021
- Total density per million population: Radiotherapy units9.3Ranked 16th▲ 10· 2021
- Total density per million population: Telecobalt Unit0.48Ranked 39th▲ 9· 2013
- Total expenditure on dental healthcare in million (US$)12,829.1Ranked 6th· 2019
- Total number of national DHS surveys conducted0Ranked 14th· 2025
- Total number of notified TB cases1,638Ranked 115th—· 2013
- Total number of psychiatrists per 100,000 population14Ranked 6th· 2018
- Total number of RCTs published in high ranked medical journals4,548Ranked 3rd· 2017
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases per million0Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2023
- Total population in thousands (oral health)37,888.7Ranked 39th· 2020
- Total productivity losses due to 5 oral diseases in million (US$)6,563.8Ranked 11th· 2019
- Total (recorded+unrecorded) alcohol per capita (15+) consumption10Ranked 10th· 2016
- Total tetanus - number of reported cases3Ranked 50th▼ 2· 2025
- Total use of antibacterials expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day14.4Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2023
- Transgender: Population size estimate (number)101,000Ranked 3rd—· 2021
- Treatment success rate for patients treated for MDR-TB (%)87Ranked 6th▼ 18· 2014
- Treatment success rate: HIV-positive TB cases85Ranked 10th▼ 8· 2023
- Treatment success rate: new TB cases79Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2023
- Treatment success rate: previously treated TB cases67Ranked 23rd▼ 11· 2012
- Treatment success rate: XDR-TB cases100Ranked 1st▼ 19· 2013
- TRGT_2030_NT_ANE_WOM_15_49_MOD5Ranked 140th· 2030
- TRGT_2030_NT_BW_LBW5Ranked 116th· 2030
- Trust doctors and nurses in this country94.7%Ranked 15th· 2020
- Tuberculosis case detection rate (%, all forms)100Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence attributed to HIV infection in males and females67Ranked 78th· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence (per 100,000 population)6.2Ranked 121st▼ 4· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence rate in males and females aged 0-4 years3.9Ranked 119th· 2024
- Tuberculosis - new and relapse cases2,508Ranked 101st▼ 5· 2024
- Tuberculosis - new and relapse cases1,391Ranked 114th▼ 2· 2011
- Tuberculosis patients who tested positive for HIV38Ranked 91st▲ 1· 2021
- Tuberculosis-related deaths among people living with HIV12Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Tuberculosis treatment coverage100Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2024
- Tuberculosis treatment success rate (% of new cases)79Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2023
- Type of nomenclature system0Ranked 1st· 2010
- Types of lists recommending health technology for high burden diseases0Ranked 1st· 2010
- UHC service coverage index92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- UHC service coverage index92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- UHC service coverage index92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1)92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1)92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on infectious diseases99Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on infectious diseases99Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on non-communicable diseases80Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on noncommunicable diseases80Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access99Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on service capacity and access99Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Under 1s4Ranked 40th▼ 15· 2022
- Under 1s2.2Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2022
- Under 1s2Ranked 28th▼ 24· 2022
- Under 1s4.7Ranked 43rd▼ 20· 2022
- Under-fifteen deaths2,399Ranked 88th▼ 4· 2024
- Under-fifteen mortality rate0.65%Ranked 42nd—· 2024
- Under-five deaths1,949Ranked 87th▼ 5· 2024
- Under-five probability of death0.49%Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2019
- Underweight0.4%Ranked 88th▼ 2· 2014
- Underweight1.4%Ranked 88th▲ 6· 2014
- Unit in the Ministry of Health responsible for the management of medical devices0Ranked 1st· 2010
- Universal health coverage (UHC) service coverage index, 2025 methodology92Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Use of nomenclature system0Ranked 1st· 2010
- UV radiation1,887Ranked 163rd· 2004
- UV radiation attributable DALYs ('000)10,885.9Ranked 45th· 2002
- UV radiation attributable DALYs per 100'000 capita34Ranked 109th· 2002
- UV radiation attributable deaths801.7Ranked 166th· 2002
- UV radiation attributable deaths per 100'000 capita2.5Ranked 102nd· 2002
- Vaccine-derived poliovirus cases0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- "Vaccines are important for children"78%Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2023
- Water, sanitation and hygiene attributable DALYs ('000)5,936.9Ranked 107th· 2004
- Water, sanitation and hygiene attributable DALYs ('000) in children under 5 years1,572.6Ranked 115th· 2004
- Water, sanitation and hygiene attributable DALYs per 100'000 capita18.6Ranked 147th· 2004
- Water, sanitation and hygiene attributable DALYs per 100'000 children under 5 years92.3Ranked 152nd· 2004
- Water, sanitation and hygiene attributable deaths ('000) in children under 5 years2.4Ranked 17th· 2004
- Water, sanitation and hygiene attributable deaths per 100'000 capita1.1Ranked 34th· 2004
- Water, sanitation and hygiene attributable deaths per 100'000 children under 5 years0.14Ranked 6th· 2004
- Wild Poliovirus cases0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Women60.6Ranked 53rd▼ 8· 2022
- Women20.6Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2022
- Women's share of population ages 15+ living with HIV (%)26.3Ranked 121st▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-ALB98.6Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-B17.3Ranked 65th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-DIS0.55Ranked 125th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-FST11.6Ranked 8th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-I98.6Ranked 64th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-L0Ranked 157th▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-LAT3.5Ranked 118th▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-OD0Ranked 105th▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-SEP11.2Ranked 105th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-SEW83.9Ranked 42nd▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-SM81.3Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-UI1.4Ranked 93rd▼ 5· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-WWT69.2Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-ALB98.3Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-B1.4Ranked 110th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-I98.3Ranked 82nd▲ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-L0Ranked 126th▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-NP0Ranked 145th▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-P98.3Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-PRE96.9Ranked 57th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-QUA98.1Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-SM96.9Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-SW0Ranked 103rd▼ 5· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-UI1.7Ranked 80th▼ 6· 2024
- Year-on-year change in female height (%)0.02Ranked 47th—· 1996
- Year-on-year change in male height (%)0.02Ranked 40th—· 1996
- Yellow fever - number of reported cases2Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2025
- Young people (ages 15-24) newly infected with HIV200Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2022
- Zoonotic diseases100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Overweight prevalence (under 5)10.4%Ranked 2nd· 2004
- DTP3 immunization coverage92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Measles (MCV1) immunization coverage92%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Under-5 mortality rate5.4Ranked 44th—· 2024
Education
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2100UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2100Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2100
Secondary enrollment
- Secondary enrollment104.3%Ranked 36th▲ 9· 2023
- Education spending4.8%Ranked 52nd▼ 15· 2022
- Primary enrollment95%Ranked 126th▼ 3· 2023
- Tertiary enrollment76.3%Ranked 36th▲ 9· 2023
- Primary completion rate98.3%Ranked 23rd· 2000
- Expected years of schooling15.9Ranked 50th—· 2023
- Mean years of schooling13.9Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, primary education or less (% of population ages 15+)100Ranked 1st▼ 21· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, secondary education or more (% of population ages 15+)98.5Ranked 23rd▲ 18· 2024
- Adjusted gender parity index for participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age), (ratio)1Ranked 63rd▲ 6· 2023
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary, female (% of primary school age children)99.1Ranked 4th▼ 12· 1998
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary, male (% of primary school age children)99.2Ranked 4th▼ 12· 1998
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary (% of primary school age children)100Ranked 3rd▼ 11· 2016
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 63rd▲ 5· 2023
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (%)93.3%Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2023
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, female (%)93.5%Ranked 41st▼ 7· 2023
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, male (%)93.1%Ranked 39th▼ 6· 2023
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of lower secondary education in mathematics (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of lower secondary education in reading (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of primary in mathematics (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of primary in reading (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally representative learning assessment in Grade 2 or 3 in mathematics (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally representative learning assessment in Grade 2 or 3 in reading (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Adolescents out of school, female (% of female lower secondary school age)1.2Ranked 102nd· 2023
- Adolescents out of school, male (% of male lower secondary school age)1.3Ranked 98th· 2023
- Adolescents out of school (% of lower secondary school age)1.2Ranked 111th▼ 10· 2023
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)54.3%Ranked 14th· 1998
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)74.9%Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2000
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)66.6%Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)60.5%Ranked 39th▼ 7· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)70.6%Ranked 42nd▲ 1· 2022
- All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in public institutions66.6%Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2022
- Average teacher salary in lower secondary education relative to other professions requiring a comparable level of qualification, both sexes1.2Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2021
- Average teacher salary in primary education relative to other professions requiring a comparable level of qualification, both sexes1.2Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2021
- Average teacher salary in upper secondary education relative to other professions requiring a comparable level of qualification, both sexes1.2Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2021
- Average years of schooling13.9Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Average years of schooling13.9Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Average years of schooling12.9Ranked 9th—· 2020
- Average years of schooling13.1Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2040
- Average years of schooling13.9Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Average years of schooling, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2021
- Average years of schooling among men13.8Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)7.4%Ranked 8th· 1998
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)3.3%Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2000
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)9.4%Ranked 26th▼ 6· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)8.7%Ranked 33rd▼ 13· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in upper-secondary public institutions (%)9.9%Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2022
- Children (13-15) who reported being in a physical fight during past year34%Ranked 63rd· 2015
- Children out of school, female (% of female primary school age)4.9Ranked 59th▲ 4· 2023
- Children out of school, male (% of male primary school age)5.1Ranked 57th▲ 4· 2023
- Children out of school (% of primary school age)5Ranked 59th▲ 3· 2023
- Children out of school, primary127,666Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2023
- Children out of school, primary, female60,948Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Children out of school, primary, male66,718Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2023
- Completion rate in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 108th▲ 5· 2025
- Completion rate in primary education99.9%Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Completion rate in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 97th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 77th▲ 4· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 45th· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1Ranked 108th▲ 5· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 23rd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)99.2%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, female (%)99.3%Ranked 4th· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, female (modelled data) (%)99.5%Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)99.8%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, female (%)99.6%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, male (%)99.7%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, male (modelled data) (%)98.9%Ranked 18th—· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, female (%)99.7%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, male (%)99.2%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)98.6%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, female (%)97.9%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, male (%)99.3%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, female (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, both sexes (%)97.2%Ranked 15th· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, female (%)96.4%Ranked 16th· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, male (%)98.1%Ranked 12th· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)98.7%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)92.8%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)96.5%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, female (%)99.3%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, male (%)99.7%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, both sexes (%)99.8%Ranked 3rd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, female (%)99.6%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)99.8%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, male (%)99.9%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.6%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)99.4%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)99.9%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 47th· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1Ranked 97th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 18th· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, both sexes (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)99.9%Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, female (%)99.7%Ranked 5th· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, female (modelled data) (%)100%Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)99.9%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, female (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, male (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, male (modelled data) (%)99.8%Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.7%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, female (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, male (%)99.6%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)99.3%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, female (%)99%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, male (%)99.7%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, female (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, both sexes (%)98.6%Ranked 16th· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, female (%)98.2%Ranked 17th· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, male (%)99%Ranked 11th· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.3%Ranked 3rd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)98.3%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, both sexes (%)99.7%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, female (%)99.6%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, male (%)99.8%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, both sexes (%)99.9%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, female (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)99.9%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, male (%)99.9%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)99.7%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)99.9%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 38th▲ 11· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.1Ranked 77th▲ 4· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 16th▲ 8· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.94Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, both sexes (%)94%Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)88.4%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, female (%)94.6%Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, female (modelled data) (%)91.5%Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)95.2%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, female (%)97.6%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, male (%)93%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, male (%)93.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 7· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, male (modelled data) (%)85.4%Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, both sexes (%)93.3%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, female (%)95.7%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, male (%)91.2%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)92.3%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, female (%)91.1%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, male (%)93.6%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, both sexes (%)97.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, female (%)98.9%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, male (%)96.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, both sexes (%)89.9%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, female (%)90.1%Ranked 11th▲ 10· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)94%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)93.9%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)94.1%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, male (%)89.8%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)91.8%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, female (%)92.8%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, male (%)90.8%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)75.2%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)79.8%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)68.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)94.5%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, female (%)97.1%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, male (%)93%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)86.8%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, female (%)84.6%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, male (%)89.2%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, both sexes (%)90.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, female (%)89.8%Ranked 2nd—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, male (%)90.8%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, both sexes (%)94.2%Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, female (%)94.9%Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)95.3%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)98%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)92.9%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, male (%)93.6%Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)93.4%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, female (%)95.9%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, male (%)91.2%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)92.9%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)91.6%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)94.3%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)97.9%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, female (%)99%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, male (%)97%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)90.6%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, female (%)90.3%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, male (%)90.9%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- Compulsory education, duration (years)10Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Contraception usage73.3%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1995
- Current education expenditure, tertiary (% of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions)91.3Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2022
- Current education expenditure, total (% of total expenditure in public institutions)90.6Ranked 41st▼ 5· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)92.6%Ranked 8th· 1998
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)96.7%Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2000
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)90.6%Ranked 41st▼ 5· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)91.3%Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in upper-secondary public institutions (%)90.1%Ranked 48th—· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)38.4%Ranked 5th· 1998
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)21.8%Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2000
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)24%Ranked 18th▼ 6· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)30.9%Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)19.6%Ranked 24th▼ 11· 2022
- DEC alternative conversion factor (LCU per US$)1.4Ranked 127th▼ 2· 2024
- Duration of compulsory education10Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Duration of compulsory education (years)10Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Duration of pre-primary education3Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)36.3Ranked 7th▼ 16· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)31.3Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)34.7Ranked 8th▼ 11· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)96.3Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)96.6Ranked 4th▼ 13· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)96.4Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)70.2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)67.5Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)68.8Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, female (%) (cumulative)96.3Ranked 13th▼ 31· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, male (%) (cumulative)96.6Ranked 14th▼ 29· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, total (%) (cumulative)96.4Ranked 12th▼ 32· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)52.9Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)45.4Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)49.3Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)90.4Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)89.3Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)89.9Ranked 4th▼ 7· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)11.4Ranked 32nd▼ 4· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)11Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)11.2Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)99.3%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, female (%)99.4%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, male (%)99.3%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 8th▲ 7· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 7th▲ 6· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, female (%)98.3%Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2001
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, male (%)99.1%Ranked 8th▲ 7· 2001
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)0.84Ranked 21st▲ 7· 2021
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)1.3Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)1.1Ranked 20th▲ 6· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 36th▼ 6· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.5Ranked 31st▲ 6· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)34.7%Ranked 8th▼ 12· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)36.3%Ranked 8th▼ 16· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.58Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)31.3%Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.42Ranked 35th▲ 10· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 13th▼ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)16.2%Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)19.4%Ranked 22nd▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)13.1%Ranked 27th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 25th—· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)32.2%Ranked 25th▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)33.3%Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)31.1%Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.39Ranked 13th▲ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)1.1%Ranked 20th▲ 6· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, female (%)0.84%Ranked 21st▲ 7· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.43Ranked 12th▲ 6· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, male (%)1.3%Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.36Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.76Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)0.47%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)0.41%Ranked 13th▲ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)0.53%Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)1.2%Ranked 20th▲ 7· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)0.94%Ranked 18th▲ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)1.5%Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th▼ 13· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)96.4%Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)96.3%Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)96.6%Ranked 4th▼ 13· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)79.4%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)80.8%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)77.8%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)84.8%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)84%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)85.6%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 29th▼ 14· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.42Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)11.2%Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)11.4%Ranked 32nd▼ 4· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.47Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)11%Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.37Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)3.9%Ranked 33rd▲ 6· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)4.3%Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)3.6%Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)9.4%Ranked 34th▲ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)9.2%Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)9.7%Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th▼ 25· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.86Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)68.8%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)70.2%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.88Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)67.5%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)55.1%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)56.7%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)53.5%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)63.8%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)64.2%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)63.3%Ranked 2nd—· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 18th▼ 27· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)96.4%Ranked 12th▼ 32· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)96.3%Ranked 13th▼ 31· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)96.6%Ranked 14th▼ 29· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)94.8%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)95.5%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)94.1%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)95.1%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)94.8%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)95.5%Ranked 1st—· 1991
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 25th▲ 6· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.71Ranked 13th▲ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)49.3%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)52.9%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.8Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)45.4%Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.62Ranked 20th▲ 8· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 15th—· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)36.9%Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)43.8%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)30.2%Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 21st▲ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)52.1%Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)54.9%Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)49%Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 17th▼ 14· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)89.9%Ranked 4th▼ 7· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)90.4%Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)89.3%Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)81.9%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)84.4%Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)79.5%Ranked 16th—· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)87.5%Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)87.7%Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)87.4%Ranked 19th▼ 4· 2021
- End month of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non-tertiary education)5Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2025
- End month of the academic school year (tertiary education)6Ranked 6th—· 2023
- End of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non tertiary education)2,025Ranked 1st—· 2025
- End of the academic school year (tertiary education)2,023Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (number)310,300Ranked 13th· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood educational development programmes, female (number)149,600Ranked 13th· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood educational development programmes, male (number)160,700Ranked 13th· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood education, both sexes (number)874,840Ranked 38th· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood education, female (number)423,065Ranked 38th· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood education, male (number)451,775Ranked 37th· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, both sexes (number)1.29MRanked 43rd▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, female (number)626,547Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, male (number)663,951Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, both sexes (number)313,805Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2000
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, female (number)135,305Ranked 2nd—· 2000
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, male (number)178,500Ranked 4th—· 2000
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, both sexes (number)564,540Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, female (number)273,465Ranked 45th—· 2023
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, male (number)291,075Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number)2.43MRanked 49th▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, female (number)1.18MRanked 50th—· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, male (number)1.25MRanked 49th▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number)2.7MRanked 34th▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, female (number)1.31MRanked 33rd▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, male (number)1.39MRanked 33rd—· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)1.84MRanked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)1.03MRanked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number)808,725Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes (number)441,714Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, female (number)232,500Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, male (number)209,214Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, both sexes (number)1.1MRanked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, female (number)625,992Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, male (number)474,330Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, both sexes (number)231,924Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, female (number)137,325Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, male (number)94,599Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, both sexes (number)63,027Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, female (number)32,445Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, male (number)30,582Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, both sexes (number)1.41MRanked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, female (number)687,348.9Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, male (number)725,760.1Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2023
- Expected years of schooling15.9Ranked 50th—· 2023
- Expected years of schooling among boys15.3Ranked 50th—· 2023
- Expenditure on education as a percentage of total government expenditure (%) (IMF calculation)11.2Ranked 29th▼ 10· 2023
- Expenditure on education as a percentage of total government expenditure (%) (UIS calculation)10.7Ranked 112th▼ 26· 2022
- Expenditure on education as share of government spending10.7%Ranked 112th▼ 26· 2022
- Expenditure on education (public, households, ODA) as a percentage of GDP5Ranked 41st▲ 8· 2021
- Expenditure on education (public, private, international) as a percentage of GDP5.8Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2015
- Expenditure on secondary education (% of government expenditure on education)26.4Ranked 78th· 2011
- Expenditure on tertiary education (% of government expenditure on education)35.6Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2011
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in curricula78.1Ranked 28th· 2020
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in national education policies87.5Ranked 4th· 2020
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in student assessment83.3Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in teacher education70Ranked 11th· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in curricula78.1Ranked 28th· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in national education policies87.5Ranked 4th· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in student assessment83.3Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in teacher education70Ranked 11th· 2020
- Female primary school age children out-of-school (%)0.04Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2016
- Female pupils below minimum reading proficiency at end of primary (%). Low GAML threshold3.7Ranked 17th▼ 15· 2016
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman1.3Ranked 183rd▲ 5· 2024
- Fertility rate, total (births per woman)1.3Ranked 172nd▼ 4· 2023
- GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$)1.83TRanked 11th—· 2024
- GDP (constant LCU)2.53TRanked 70th▼ 1· 2024
- GDP (current LCU)3.07TRanked 77th▼ 1· 2024
- GDP (current US$)2.24TRanked 9th▼ 1· 2024
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country)121.5Ranked 123rd▼ 15· 2024
- GDP growth (annual %)1.5Ranked 141st—· 2024
- GDP per capita (current LCU)74,332.4Ranked 109th▼ 8· 2024
- GDP per capita (current US$)54,282.6Ranked 18th▼ 4· 2024
- GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2011 international $)56,691.9Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)65,463.1Ranked 26th—· 2024
- GDP, PPP (constant 2011 international $)2.34TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- GDP, PPP (current international $)2.7TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- General government total expenditure (current LCU)1.42TRanked 72nd▼ 2· 2025
- GNI (current LCU)3.02TRanked 78th▲ 1· 2024
- GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$)53,340Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2024
- GNI per capita (current LCU)73,202.9Ranked 108th▼ 4· 2024
- GNI per capita, PPP (current international $)64,470Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2024
- Government expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)4.8%Ranked 52nd▼ 15· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, constant PPP$ (millions)115,097.2Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, constant US$ (millions)101,843Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, constant PPP$ (millions)0Ranked 34th▼ 7· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, constant US$ (millions)0Ranked 34th▼ 7· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, PPP$ (millions)0Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, US$ (millions)0Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, PPP$ (millions)105,579.7Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, total (% of government expenditure)10.7Ranked 112th▼ 26· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, US$ (millions)97,969.1Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0%Ranked 55th—· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, constant PPP$ (millions)0Ranked 40th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, constant US$ (millions)0Ranked 41st▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, PPP$ (millions)0Ranked 40th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, US$ (millions)0Ranked 41st▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.21%Ranked 37th▲ 8· 2000
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, constant PPP$ (millions)3,254.8Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2000
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, constant US$ (millions)2,880Ranked 6th—· 2000
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, PPP$ (millions)1,789Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2000
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, US$ (millions)1,433.9Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2000
- Government expenditure on secondary education as a percentage of GDP (%)1.4%Ranked 58th· 2011
- Government expenditure on secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions)27,071.3Ranked 10th· 2011
- Government expenditure on secondary education, constant US$ (millions)23,953.9Ranked 7th· 2011
- Government expenditure on secondary education, PPP$ (millions)18,945.6Ranked 9th· 2011
- Government expenditure on secondary education, US$ (millions)22,471.4Ranked 7th· 2011
- Government expenditure on tertiary education as a percentage of GDP (%)1.3%Ranked 18th▼ 7· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant PPP$ (millions)30,515.8Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant US$ (millions)27,001.7Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, PPP$ (millions)27,992.4Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, US$ (millions)25,974.6Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education as a percentage of GDP (%)1.3%Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions)30,596.5Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant US$ (millions)27,073.1Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, PPP$ (millions)28,066.4Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, US$ (millions)26,043.3Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure per student, primary (% of GDP per capita)17.6Ranked 35th· 2015
- Government expenditure per student, secondary (% of GDP per capita)18.3Ranked 52nd· 2011
- Government expenditure per student, tertiary (% of GDP per capita)31.4Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2016
- Government spending on education as share of GDP4.8%Ranked 52nd▼ 15· 2022
- Gross enrollment ratio in primary education95%Ranked 126th▼ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 60th▲ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, both sexes (%)76.3%Ranked 36th▲ 9· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, female (%)88.6%Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, male (%)64.8%Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 74th▲ 21· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 69th▲ 21· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)98.8%Ranked 70th▲ 28· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%)98.7%Ranked 73rd▲ 23· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 32nd· 2000
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, both sexes (%)37.4%Ranked 8th· 2000
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, female (%)33.2%Ranked 12th· 2000
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, male (%)41.5%Ranked 5th· 2000
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 59th▲ 11· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 53rd▲ 10· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%)96.3%Ranked 103rd▲ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)96.4%Ranked 104th▲ 11· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%)96.2%Ranked 100th▲ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 79th▲ 21· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%)99.7%Ranked 61st▲ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)99.8%Ranked 60th▲ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%)99.6%Ranked 57th▼ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, both sexes (%)95%Ranked 126th▼ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female (%)95.1%Ranked 125th▼ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, male (%)94.9%Ranked 124th▼ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 35th▲ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes (%)92.2%Ranked 42nd▲ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%)96.3%Ranked 38th▲ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male (%)88.4%Ranked 50th▲ 7· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 89th▲ 22· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes (%)104.3%Ranked 36th▲ 9· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%)104.5%Ranked 35th▲ 7· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male (%)104.2%Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPI)1Ranked 92nd▲ 10· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, both sexes (%)110%Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female (%)110.2%Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male (%)109.7%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, both sexes (%)42.8%Ranked 33rd▲ 8· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, female (%)53.4%Ranked 34th▲ 9· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, male (%)33.1%Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2023
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, female (% of relevant age group)100.4Ranked 88th▲ 13· 2011
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, male (% of relevant age group)99.3Ranked 101st▲ 2· 2011
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, total (% of relevant age group)99.8Ranked 97th▲ 4· 2011
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 38th· 2000
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%)98.3%Ranked 23rd· 2000
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, female (%)98.3%Ranked 23rd· 2000
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, male (%)98.2%Ranked 22nd· 2000
- Harmonized test scores among all students534Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Harmonized test scores among all students534Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Harmonized test scores among all students534Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, female (scale 0–188)154.1Ranked 22nd▲ 6· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, male (scale 0–188)148Ranked 20th▼ 5· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, total (scale 0–188)153Ranked 20th▼ 5· 2025
- IIASA rates of no education projections0.03%Ranked 175th—· 2100
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, both sexes (number)42,825Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, female (number)19,104Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, male (number)23,721Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.62Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, both sexes (number)2,355Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, female (number)903Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, male (number)1,452Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, both sexes (number)21Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, female (number)12Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, male (number)9Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.68Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, both sexes (number)534Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, female (number)216Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, male (number)318Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.79Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, both sexes (number)102Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, female (number)45Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, male (number)57Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, both sexes (number)960Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, female (number)426Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, male (number)534Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, both sexes (number)177Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, female (number)99Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, male (number)78Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, both sexes (number)2,142Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, female (number)957Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, male (number)1,185Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, both sexes (number)3Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, female (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, male (number)3Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.47Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, both sexes (number)66Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, female (number)21Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, male (number)45Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.6Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, both sexes (number)24Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, female (number)9Ranked 10th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, male (number)15Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, both sexes (number)2,316Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, female (number)1,143Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, male (number)1,173Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, both sexes (number)36Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, female (number)21Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, male (number)15Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.38Ranked 32nd▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, both sexes (number)2,085Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, female (number)576Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, male (number)1,509Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 10· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, both sexes (number)6Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, female (number)3Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, male (number)3Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 4th▼ 10· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, both sexes (number)21Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, female (number)12Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, male (number)9Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th▲ 12· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, both sexes (number)6Ranked 17th▲ 9· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, female (number)3Ranked 12th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, male (number)3Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.84Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, both sexes (number)336Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, female (number)153Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, male (number)183Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, both sexes (number)186Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, female (number)99Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, male (number)87Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.71Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, both sexes (number)1,776Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, female (number)735Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, male (number)1,041Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, both sexes (number)9Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, female (number)3Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, male (number)6Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, both sexes (number)729Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, female (number)264Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, male (number)465Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, both sexes (number)1,365Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, female (number)657Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, male (number)708Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st▼ 10· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, both sexes (number)3Ranked 16th▲ 9· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, female (number)3Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, male (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 8· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 21st▲ 13· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, both sexes (number)27Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, female (number)9Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, male (number)18Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.33Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, both sexes (number)180Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, female (number)45Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, male (number)135Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, both sexes (number)420Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, female (number)228Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, male (number)192Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, both sexes (number)48Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, female (number)27Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, male (number)21Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.76Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, both sexes (number)717Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, female (number)309Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, male (number)408Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.41Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, both sexes (number)72Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, female (number)21Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, male (number)51Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, both sexes (number)1,026Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, female (number)525Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, male (number)501Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 31st▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, both sexes (number)3,750Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, female (number)1,503Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, male (number)2,247Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.4Ranked 28th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, both sexes (number)21Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, female (number)6Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, male (number)15Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, female (number)0Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, male (number)0Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.64Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, both sexes (number)192Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, female (number)75Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, both sexes (number)12,072Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, female (number)5,790Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, male (number)6,282Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, male (number)117Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, both sexes (number)567Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, female (number)303Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, male (number)264Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, male (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.71Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, both sexes (number)1,941Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, female (number)807Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, male (number)1,134Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, both sexes (number)3Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, female (number)3Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, male (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, both sexes (number)42Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, female (number)21Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, male (number)21Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, both sexes (number)9Ranked 27th▲ 10· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, female (number)3Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, male (number)6Ranked 21st▲ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, both sexes (number)414Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, female (number)210Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, male (number)204Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, both sexes (number)6Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, female (number)3Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, male (number)3Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, both sexes (number)165Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, female (number)66Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, male (number)99Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan (pre-secession), both sexes (number)54Ranked 12th—· 2010
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, both sexes (number)90Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, female (number)36Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, male (number)54Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, both sexes (number)189Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, female (number)84Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, male (number)105Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, both sexes (number)2,028Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, female (number)978Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, male (number)1,050Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, both sexes (number)72Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, female (number)33Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, male (number)39Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, both sexes (number)489Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, female (number)228Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, male (number)261Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, both sexes (number)411Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, female (number)150Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, male (number)261Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 24th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, both sexes (number)1,416Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, female (number)660Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, male (number)756Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, both sexes (number)408Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, female (number)207Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, male (number)201Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)3Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, female (number)3Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, both sexes (number)138Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, female (number)72Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, male (number)66Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 20th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, both sexes (number)651Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, female (number)339Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, male (number)312Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.83Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, both sexes (number)279,801Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, female (number)126,627Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, male (number)153,174Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.59Ranked 14th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, both sexes (number)105Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, female (number)39Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, male (number)66Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, both sexes (number)24Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, female (number)12Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, male (number)12Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 23rd▲ 9· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, both sexes (number)165Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, female (number)60Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, male (number)105Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.64Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, both sexes (number)69Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, female (number)27Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, male (number)42Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.51Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, both sexes (number)7,320Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, female (number)2,460Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, male (number)4,860Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, both sexes (number)192Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, female (number)126Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, male (number)66Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, both sexes (number)24Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, female (number)15Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, male (number)9Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, both sexes (number)108Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, female (number)66Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, male (number)42Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 38th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, both sexes (number)64,584Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, female (number)31,293Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, male (number)33,291Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, both sexes (number)18Ranked 20th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, female (number)9Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, male (number)9Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 29th▲ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, both sexes (number)15Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, female (number)6Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, male (number)9Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, both sexes (number)5,697Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, female (number)3,042Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, male (number)2,655Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.71Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, both sexes (number)137,850Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, female (number)57,138Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, male (number)80,712Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 23rd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, both sexes (number)1,806Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, female (number)864Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, male (number)942Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.34Ranked 32nd▲ 11· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, both sexes (number)153Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, female (number)39Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, male (number)114Ranked 19th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 25th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, both sexes (number)378Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, female (number)174Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, male (number)204Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, both sexes (number)1,890Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, female (number)1,011Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, male (number)879Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.39Ranked 29th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, both sexes (number)891Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, female (number)249Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, male (number)642Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, both sexes (number)603Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, female (number)297Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, male (number)306Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, both sexes (number)618Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, female (number)228Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, male (number)390Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, both sexes (number)87Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, female (number)45Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, male (number)42Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, both sexes (number)15Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, female (number)9Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, male (number)6Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.62Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, both sexes (number)1,500Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, female (number)576Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, male (number)924Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, both sexes (number)159Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, female (number)87Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, male (number)72Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, both sexes (number)813Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, female (number)381Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, male (number)432Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 14th▲ 9· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, both sexes (number)6Ranked 17th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, female (number)3Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, male (number)3Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, both sexes (number)201Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, female (number)108Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, male (number)93Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, both sexes (number)315Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, female (number)153Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, male (number)162Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.73Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, both sexes (number)3,135Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, female (number)1,326Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, male (number)1,809Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.66Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, both sexes (number)264Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, female (number)105Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, male (number)159Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.37Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, both sexes (number)3,852Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, female (number)1,041Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, male (number)2,811Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.47Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, both sexes (number)132Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, female (number)42Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, male (number)90Ranked 17th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.71Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, both sexes (number)87Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, female (number)36Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, male (number)51Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, both sexes (number)1,215Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, female (number)447Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, male (number)768Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, both sexes (number)489Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, female (number)237Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, male (number)252Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, both sexes (number)1,872Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, female (number)921Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, male (number)951Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, both sexes (number)30Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, female (number)15Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, male (number)15Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, both sexes (number)843Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, female (number)450Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, male (number)393Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, both sexes (number)18Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, female (number)6Ranked 9th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, male (number)12Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 24th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, both sexes (number)12,705Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, female (number)6,240Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, male (number)6,465Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 11th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, both sexes (number)11,205Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, female (number)7,710Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, male (number)3,495Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 23rd▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, both sexes (number)5,889Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, female (number)3,267Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, male (number)2,622Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.53Ranked 28th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, both sexes (number)234Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, female (number)81Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, male (number)153Ranked 13th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, both sexes (number)432Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, female (number)174Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, male (number)258Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.32Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, both sexes (number)135Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, female (number)33Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, male (number)102Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, both sexes (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, female (number)0Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, male (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, both sexes (number)2,289Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, female (number)1,023Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, male (number)1,266Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, both sexes (number)12Ranked 24th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, female (number)6Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, male (number)6Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)1,911Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, female (number)1,008Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, male (number)903Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, both sexes (number)51Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, female (number)21Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, male (number)30Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, both sexes (number)7,395Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, female (number)3,921Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, male (number)3,474Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, both sexes (number)9Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, female (number)3Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, male (number)6Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, both sexes (number)102Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, female (number)66Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, male (number)36Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, both sexes (number)18Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, female (number)12Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, male (number)6Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, both sexes (number)783Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, female (number)447Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, male (number)336Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, both sexes (number)339Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, female (number)195Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, male (number)144Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, both sexes (number)105Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, female (number)54Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, male (number)51Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, both sexes (number)156Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, female (number)75Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, male (number)81Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, both sexes (number)120Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, female (number)66Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, male (number)54Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, both sexes (number)51Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, female (number)27Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, male (number)24Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, both sexes (number)270Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, female (number)159Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, male (number)111Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, both sexes (number)300Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, female (number)147Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, male (number)153Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, both sexes (number)45Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, female (number)30Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, male (number)15Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 9th▼ 14· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, both sexes (number)81Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, female (number)45Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, male (number)36Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, both sexes (number)1,059Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, female (number)519Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, male (number)540Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 9th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, both sexes (number)264Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, female (number)153Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, male (number)111Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, both sexes (number)1,155Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, female (number)777Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, male (number)378Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, both sexes (number)4,266Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, female (number)2,205Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, male (number)2,061Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2021
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, female (number)0Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 13th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, both sexes (number)45Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, female (number)24Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, male (number)21Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, both sexes (number)282Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, female (number)150Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, male (number)132Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, both sexes (number)45Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, female (number)24Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, male (number)21Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 9th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, both sexes (number)81Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, female (number)48Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, male (number)33Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, both sexes (number)42Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, female (number)24Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, male (number)18Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.7Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2021
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, female (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, male (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, both sexes (number)48Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, female (number)27Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, male (number)21Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Netherlands Antilles, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2011
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, both sexes (number)9Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, female (number)6Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, male (number)3Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, both sexes (number)645Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, female (number)375Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, male (number)270Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2011
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)1Ranked 44th▼ 11· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)5,601Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)2,811Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)2,790Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.92Ranked 30th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)1,188Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)570Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)618Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)1.1Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)101,787Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (number)52,779Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)49,008Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 59th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, both sexes (number)29,211Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, female (number)14,631Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, male (number)14,580Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, both sexes (number)204Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, female (number)111Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, male (number)93Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, both sexes (number)3Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, female (number)3Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, male (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 26th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, both sexes (number)114Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, female (number)63Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, male (number)51Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 26th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, both sexes (number)45Ranked 20th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, female (number)27Ranked 20th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, male (number)18Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, both sexes (number)771Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, female (number)414Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, male (number)357Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 21st▼ 9· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, both sexes (number)12Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, female (number)6Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, male (number)6Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 24th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, both sexes (number)36Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, female (number)21Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, male (number)15Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, both sexes (number)27Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, female (number)12Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, male (number)15Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 20th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, both sexes (number)117Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, female (number)60Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, male (number)57Ranked 10th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 25th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, both sexes (number)15Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, female (number)6Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, male (number)9Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 32nd▲ 14· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, both sexes (number)69Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, female (number)36Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, male (number)33Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, both sexes (number)19,191Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, female (number)9,387Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, male (number)9,804Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 26th▼ 8· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, both sexes (number)1,101Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, female (number)597Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, male (number)504Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, both sexes (number)3Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, male (number)3Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.77Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, both sexes (number)186Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, female (number)81Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, male (number)105Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, both sexes (number)63Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, female (number)39Ranked 18th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, male (number)24Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, both sexes (number)27Ranked 13th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, female (number)12Ranked 13th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, male (number)15Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 29th▲ 9· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, both sexes (number)186Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, female (number)90Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, male (number)96Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 39th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, both sexes (number)813Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, female (number)381Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, male (number)432Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, both sexes (number)21Ranked 20th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, female (number)15Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, male (number)6Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, female (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, male (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 27th▲ 16· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, both sexes (number)24Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, female (number)12Ranked 24th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, male (number)12Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, both sexes (number)54Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, female (number)27Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, male (number)27Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, both sexes (number)15Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, female (number)9Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, male (number)6Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, both sexes (number)9Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, female (number)6Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, male (number)3Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, both sexes (number)6Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, female (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, male (number)6Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 8th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, both sexes (number)18Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, female (number)12Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, male (number)6Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, both sexes (number)90Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, female (number)51Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, male (number)39Ranked 18th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 27th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, both sexes (number)111Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, female (number)66Ranked 20th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, male (number)45Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 33rd▲ 19· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, both sexes (number)177Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, female (number)87Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, male (number)90Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 11th▼ 19· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, both sexes (number)69Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, female (number)48Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, male (number)21Ranked 21st▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th—· 2021
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, male (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 33rd▲ 16· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, both sexes (number)87Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, female (number)45Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, male (number)42Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 29th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, both sexes (number)75Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, female (number)30Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, male (number)45Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 26th▲ 20· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, both sexes (number)9Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, female (number)3Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, male (number)6Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 30th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, both sexes (number)582Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, female (number)312Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, male (number)270Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 27th▲ 14· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, both sexes (number)150Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, female (number)81Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, male (number)69Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 29th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, both sexes (number)336Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, female (number)156Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, male (number)180Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, both sexes (number)72Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, female (number)33Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, male (number)39Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, female (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, male (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, both sexes (number)357Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, female (number)201Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, male (number)156Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 9th▼ 16· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, both sexes (number)18Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, female (number)12Ranked 19th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, male (number)6Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 41st▼ 10· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, both sexes (number)1,242Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, female (number)642Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, male (number)600Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 32nd▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, both sexes (number)1,158Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, female (number)648Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, male (number)510Ranked 13th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 20th▼ 8· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, both sexes (number)1,290Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, female (number)654Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, male (number)636Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)258Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, female (number)135Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, male (number)123Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 30th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)1.1Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (number)23,031Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)23,241Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, female (number)12,048Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (number)12,171Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, male (number)10,983Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (number)11,070Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)1Ranked 50th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)34,986Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)17,730Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)17,256Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, both sexes (number)9,159Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, female (number)4,962Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, male (number)4,197Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, both sexes (number)210Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, female (number)123Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, male (number)87Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, both sexes (number)0Ranked 54th▲ 5· 2015
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, female (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 37· 2015
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, male (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 37· 2015
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 31st▲ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, both sexes (number)8,949Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, female (number)4,839Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, male (number)4,110Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, the Caribbean and Central America, both sexes (number)12,705Ranked 3rd—· 2011
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 21st▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, both sexes (number)537Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, female (number)267Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, male (number)270Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 19th▼ 8· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, both sexes (number)312Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, female (number)153Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, male (number)159Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, both sexes (number)21Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, female (number)12Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, male (number)9Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2016
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, female (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, both sexes (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, female (number)0Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, both sexes (number)111Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, female (number)54Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, male (number)57Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, both sexes (number)3Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, male (number)3Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, female (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, both sexes (number)3Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, female (number)3Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, male (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, female (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, male (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2013
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, female (number)0Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2018
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, female (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, male (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, both sexes (number)6Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, female (number)3Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, male (number)3Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 2nd—· 2018
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, female (number)0Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, male (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, both sexes (number)3Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, female (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, male (number)3Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, male (number)0Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)78Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, female (number)42Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, male (number)36Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 8th▲ 7· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, female (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, male (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America, both sexes (number)2,070Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2011
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, both sexes (number)357Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, female (number)180Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, male (number)177Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, both sexes (number)4,656Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, female (number)2,409Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, male (number)2,247Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.71Ranked 24th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, both sexes (number)666Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, female (number)276Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, male (number)390Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, both sexes (number)3,444Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, female (number)1,731Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, male (number)1,713Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, both sexes (number)945Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, female (number)483Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, male (number)462Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, both sexes (number)204Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, female (number)120Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, male (number)84Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.6Ranked 20th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, both sexes (number)24Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, female (number)9Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, male (number)15Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, both sexes (number)1,446Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, female (number)741Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, male (number)705Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, both sexes (number)6Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, female (number)3Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, male (number)3Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, both sexes (number)339Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, female (number)156Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, male (number)183Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, both sexes (number)141Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, female (number)84Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, male (number)57Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2011
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 9th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, both sexes (number)51Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, female (number)30Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, male (number)21Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.71Ranked 37th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)167,037Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)69,294Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)97,743Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.88Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)32,763Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (number)15,306Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (number)17,457Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.59Ranked 22nd▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)15,789Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (number)5,832Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (number)9,957Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Caribbean and Central America, both sexes (number)4,920Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2011
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.1Ranked 19th▲ 10· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, both sexes (number)4,617Ranked 9th▼ 34· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, female (number)2,385Ranked 9th▼ 29· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, male (number)2,232Ranked 7th▼ 34· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate) (GPIA)0.68Ranked 65th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, both sexes21.2%Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)21.2%Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate) (%)17.5%Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, male (UIS estimate) (%)25.9%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inequality in education0.02Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Initial government expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)4.8%Ranked 28th▼ 26· 2022
- Initial government funding per secondary student as a percentage of GDP per capita18.3Ranked 43rd· 2011
- Initial government funding per secondary student, constant PPP$10,477.4Ranked 18th· 2011
- Initial government funding per tertiary student as a percentage of GDP per capita23.1Ranked 32nd▼ 11· 2022
- Initial government funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$14,367.6Ranked 19th▼ 8· 2022
- Initial government funding per upper secondary student as a percentage of GDP per capita35.3Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Initial government funding per upper secondary student, constant PPP$21,933.4Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2022
- Initial household funding per secondary student as a percentage of GDP per capita0.79Ranked 27th· 2011
- Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$455Ranked 20th· 2011
- Initial household funding per tertiary student as a percentage of GDP per capita4.5Ranked 15th▼ 11· 2022
- Initial household funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$2,789.4Ranked 12th▼ 11· 2022
- Initial private expenditure on education (household) as a percentage of GDP (%)0.25%Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2022
- Initial private expenditure on education (other non-educational private entities) as a percentage of GDP (%)0.53%Ranked 2nd—· 2021
- International expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)0%Ranked 69th▼ 3· 2021
- Learning-adjusted years of schooling among boys11.6Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
- Learning poverty: Share of Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)4.3Ranked 12th▲ 9· 2016
- Learning poverty: Share of Female Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)3.8Ranked 12th▲ 9· 2016
- Learning poverty: Share of Male Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)4.8Ranked 11th▲ 8· 2016
- Life expectancy at birth, total (years)81.6Ranked 38th▲ 6· 2023
- Literacy rate97.5%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1950
- Literacy rate97.5%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1950
- Lower secondary school starting age (years)12Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Male primary school age children out-of-school (%)0.04Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2016
- Male pupils below minimum reading proficiency at end of primary (%). Low GAML threshold4.8Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2016
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2021
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, both sexes13.9Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, female13.9Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, male13.8Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2021
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.2Ranked 46th▼ 19· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)2.2%Ranked 104th▲ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, female (UIS estimate) (%)2.4%Ranked 88th▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, male (UIS estimate) (%)1.9%Ranked 104th▲ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.99Ranked 46th—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 112th▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 99th▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 125th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.3Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 67th▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 58th▼ 9· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 71st▼ 8· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.19%Ranked 46th▼ 2· 2018
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 63rd▼ 4· 2018
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.2Ranked 69th▼ 11· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1Ranked 86th▲ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 54th▲ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 52nd—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 66th▲ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.03%Ranked 65th▲ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 65th▲ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.2Ranked 57th▼ 15· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)1.8%Ranked 66th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)2%Ranked 65th▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)1.6%Ranked 67th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.1Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.3Ranked 22nd▼ 21· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 81st▼ 11· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 77th▼ 9· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 86th▼ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.2Ranked 23rd—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 60th▼ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 44th▼ 8· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 70th▼ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.3Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.13%Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.15%Ranked 35th—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.11%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2023
- Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births)4.4Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Net enrollment rate in primary education95%Ranked 97th▲ 3· 2023
- Net enrollment rate in primary education among girls95.1%Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2023
- Net enrollment rate, pre-primary, boys (%)92.6%Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2022
- Net enrollment rates in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 57th· 2023
- Net enrollment rates in primary education, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 57th▲ 12· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 44th· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)28.1%Ranked 28th· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%)27.8%Ranked 27th· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%)28.4%Ranked 26th· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.82Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)337,060Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), female (UIS estimate) (number)151,827Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), male (UIS estimate) (number)185,233Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.64Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2023
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)18.3%Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), female (UIS estimate) (%)14.8%Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), male (UIS estimate) (%)22.9%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)20.6%Ranked 2nd· 1998
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)14.5%Ranked 8th—· 2000
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)18.8%Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)27.5%Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)13.1%Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2022
- Normalized harmonized test scores among all students0.91Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Number of attacks on students, personnel and institutions3Ranked 31st· 2024
- Number of years of compulsory pre-primary education guaranteed in legal frameworks0Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Number of years of compulsory primary and secondary education guaranteed in legal frameworks10Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Number of years of free pre-primary education guaranteed in legal frameworks1Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Number of years of free primary and secondary education guaranteed in legal frameworks12Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to compulsory education6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to compulsory education (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to early childhood educational development (years)0Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Official entrance age to early childhood education (years)0Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Official entrance age to lower secondary education (years)12Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to post-secondary non-tertiary education (years)18Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to pre-primary education (years)3Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Official entrance age to pre-primary education (years)3Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Official entrance age to primary education (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to upper secondary education (years)15Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Official exchange rate (LCU per US$, period average)1.4Ranked 106th▼ 16· 2024
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)1,330Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)636Ranked 65th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)694Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)69Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)40Ranked 32nd▼ 5· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)29Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)4,367Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2018
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)1,125Ranked 36th▲ 2· 2018
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)1,384Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (number)683Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (number)701Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)553Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (number)292Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (number)261Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)43,479Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)23,682Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)19,797Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)341Ranked 35th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)169Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)172Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)94Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (number)54Ranked 59th▼ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (number)40Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)1,451Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (number)770Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (number)682Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)3,119Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (number)1,779Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)1,340Ranked 25th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 42nd▼ 9· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)2.8%Ranked 84th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate) (%)2.7%Ranked 79th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, male (UIS estimate) (%)3%Ranked 82nd—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.72Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 90th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 78th▲ 4· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.09%Ranked 92nd▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 21st▼ 7· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 44th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 47th▼ 7· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.27%Ranked 46th▲ 4· 2018
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 56th▲ 6· 2018
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 47th▼ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.77Ranked 58th▲ 4· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.09%Ranked 32nd▲ 6· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.03%Ranked 48th▲ 13· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.03%Ranked 43rd▲ 11· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.03%Ranked 47th▲ 12· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 52nd▼ 10· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)2.4%Ranked 62nd▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)2.3%Ranked 61st▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)2.4%Ranked 60th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.78Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 29th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 38th▲ 4· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 25th▼ 18· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 42nd▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 42nd▼ 6· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 28th▼ 5· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 33rd—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.17%Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.17%Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.17%Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, both sexes (number)214,323Ranked 47th▼ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, female (number)106,646Ranked 43rd▼ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, male (number)107,677Ranked 49th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (number)16,077Ranked 69th▼ 10· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (number)7,578Ranked 62nd· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (number)8,499Ranked 67th· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, both sexes (number)341,989Ranked 40th▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, female (number)167,594Ranked 34th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, male (number)174,395Ranked 38th—· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, both sexes (number)143,743Ranked 42nd▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, female (number)68,526Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, male (number)75,217Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age127,666Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, both sexes (number)127,666Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, female (number)60,948Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, male (number)66,718Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (number)27,280Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, female (number)12,956Ranked 49th—· 2023
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, male (number)14,324Ranked 49th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school girls of primary school age60,948Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 25th▼ 39· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)8.3%Ranked 89th—· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, female (%)8.5%Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, male (%)8.1%Ranked 87th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 62nd· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.4Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (%)1.2%Ranked 111th▼ 10· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)2.2%Ranked 118th—· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (%)1.2%Ranked 102nd· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (modelled data) (%)2.9%Ranked 105th▼ 7· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (%)1.3%Ranked 98th· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (modelled data) (%)1.6%Ranked 124th▼ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 33rd▼ 27· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)6.6%Ranked 82nd▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, female (%)6.7%Ranked 72nd▲ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, male (%)6.6%Ranked 74th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 59th▼ 23· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, both sexes (%)3.7%Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, female (%)3.6%Ranked 72nd▲ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, male (%)3.8%Ranked 67th▲ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age5%Ranked 59th▲ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 51st▼ 12· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.3Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, both sexes (%)5%Ranked 59th▲ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)2%Ranked 95th▼ 3· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female (%)4.9%Ranked 59th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female (modelled data) (%)2.3%Ranked 94th▼ 4· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male (%)5.1%Ranked 57th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male (modelled data) (%)1.6%Ranked 104th▼ 5· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before official primary entry age6.7%Ranked 81st—· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 66th▼ 20· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (%)6.7%Ranked 81st—· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, female (%)6.5%Ranked 81st▲ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, male (%)6.9%Ranked 87th▲ 8· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 24th▼ 21· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.3Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.5Ranked 1st▼ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.8Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)0.66Ranked 29th▲ 15· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)15.4%Ranked 83rd▼ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.2%Ranked 61st▲ 23· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)12.6%Ranked 109th▲ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (%)15.9%Ranked 72nd▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (household survey data) (%)1.6%Ranked 63rd▲ 27· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (modelled data) (%)15.1%Ranked 92nd▼ 9· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.81%Ranked 39th▲ 12· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.7%Ranked 28th▲ 13· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 29th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (%)15%Ranked 86th▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (household survey data) (%)0.8%Ranked 62nd▲ 20· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (modelled data) (%)10.2%Ranked 118th▼ 4· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.7%Ranked 41st▲ 15· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)4.3%Ranked 28th▲ 16· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.2%Ranked 29th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.29%Ranked 41st▲ 16· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 30th▲ 15· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.56%Ranked 29th▲ 15· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.44%Ranked 40th▲ 20· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 27th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.88%Ranked 29th▲ 15· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, both sexes (household survey data) (%)4.2%Ranked 54th▲ 30· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, female (household survey data) (%)5.8%Ranked 47th▲ 24· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)7.8%Ranked 31st▲ 11· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)14.5%Ranked 17th· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 21st▲ 7· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, male (household survey data) (%)2.7%Ranked 60th▲ 34· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 39th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 26th▲ 12· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 26th▲ 12· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 40th▲ 20· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)7.5%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2017
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)12.2%Ranked 31st▲ 17· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)30.7%Ranked 10th· 2017
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)10.8%Ranked 26th▲ 16· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.6%Ranked 40th▲ 15· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.9%Ranked 27th▲ 12· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.3%Ranked 29th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.87%Ranked 62nd▲ 18· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, female (household survey data) (%)1.2%Ranked 61st▲ 19· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 40th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 26th▲ 13· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 26th▲ 13· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, male (household survey data) (%)0.59%Ranked 63rd▲ 21· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)3.1%Ranked 37th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)5%Ranked 22nd▲ 13· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.4%Ranked 24th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.32%Ranked 32nd▲ 11· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 16th▲ 8· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.61%Ranked 18th▲ 10· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.48%Ranked 36th▲ 17· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 25th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.95%Ranked 25th▲ 12· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.49%Ranked 36th▲ 14· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.93%Ranked 19th▲ 10· 2018
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 20th▲ 12· 2018
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (number)198,246Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, female (number)99,068Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, male (number)99,178Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2023
- Over-age students, primary, female (% of female enrollment)0Ranked 146th▲ 1· 2017
- Over-age students, primary, male (% of male enrollment)0Ranked 146th▲ 1· 2017
- Over-age students, primary (% of enrollment)0Ranked 146th▲ 1· 2017
- Participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training, by sex (%) - 15 to 64 years old - Both sexes13.5%Ranked 1st▼ 55· 2024
- Participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age), by sex (%)93.3Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▼ 20· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)53.1%Ranked 21st▼ 41· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, female (%)56.6%Ranked 20th▼ 38· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, male (%)49.7%Ranked 22nd▼ 43· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th▼ 15· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, both sexes (%)13.5%Ranked 22nd▼ 35· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, female (%)14.6%Ranked 18th▼ 34· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, male (%)12.4%Ranked 21st▼ 39· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▼ 16· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, both sexes (%)5.3%Ranked 14th▼ 23· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, female (%)6.4%Ranked 14th▼ 23· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, male (%)4.3%Ranked 12th▼ 24· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, both sexes (%)0.53%Ranked 14th▼ 17· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, female (%)0.62%Ranked 12th▼ 18· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, male (%)0.44%Ranked 11th▼ 21· 2024
- Percentage of enrollment in primary education in private institutions6.7%Ranked 83rd▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 47th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)9.7%Ranked 67th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, female (%)49.5%Ranked 47th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, male (%)50.5%Ranked 66th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 75th▲ 23· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)90.3%Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, female (%)48.5%Ranked 75th▲ 22· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, male (%)51.5%Ranked 44th▼ 16· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2000
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2000
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions7.8%Ranked 90th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 100th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)7.8%Ranked 90th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, female (%)46.1%Ranked 100th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, male (%)53.9%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)92.2%Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, female (%)48.6%Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, male (%)51.4%Ranked 49th▼ 7· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 39th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)6.7%Ranked 83rd▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, female (%)49.4%Ranked 39th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, male (%)50.6%Ranked 82nd▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 57th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)93.3%Ranked 39th▼ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, female (%)48.7%Ranked 57th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, male (%)51.3%Ranked 70th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 73rd▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)9%Ranked 82nd▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, female (%)48.7%Ranked 74th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, male (%)51.3%Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 72nd▲ 12· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)91%Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, female (%)48.6%Ranked 73rd▲ 13· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, male (%)51.4%Ranked 46th▼ 10· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 62nd▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, female (%)56%Ranked 62nd▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, male (%)44%Ranked 52nd▼ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 83rd▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)8.4%Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, female (%)48%Ranked 83rd▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, male (%)52%Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 66th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)91.6%Ranked 30th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, female (%)48.7%Ranked 67th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, male (%)51.3%Ranked 50th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, both sexes (%)1%Ranked 67th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, female (%)1.1%Ranked 62nd▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, male (%)0.94%Ranked 74th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 58th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, both sexes (%)7.5%Ranked 58th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, female (%)8.2%Ranked 61st▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, male (%)6.5%Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 77th▲ 13· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, both sexes (%)25.5%Ranked 56th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, female (%)24%Ranked 62nd▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, male (%)27.6%Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, both sexes (%)5.3%Ranked 90th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, female (%)7.1%Ranked 88th▲ 10· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, male (%)2.7%Ranked 81st▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.24Ranked 79th▲ 14· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, both sexes (%)10.8%Ranked 64th▲ 13· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, female (%)4.7%Ranked 72nd▲ 11· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, male (%)19.2%Ranked 60th▲ 14· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.7Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, both sexes (%)15.3%Ranked 40th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, female (%)22.2%Ranked 32nd▲ 13· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, male (%)5.7%Ranked 73rd▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.75Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, both sexes (%)4.2%Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, female (%)3.7%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, male (%)5%Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.82Ranked 40th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, both sexes (%)5.5%Ranked 37th▲ 11· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, female (%)5%Ranked 31st▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, male (%)6.1%Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of persons employed in audio-visual and interactive media that are females63.9Ranked 2nd· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in books and press that are females61Ranked 23rd· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural and natural heritage that are females50.4Ranked 14th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations3.9Ranked 32nd· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations, females4Ranked 35th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations, males3.8Ranked 23rd· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are females48.8Ranked 23rd· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are working in audio-visual and interactive media8.2Ranked 3rd· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are working in books and press14.7Ranked 12th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are working in cultural and natural heritage9.4Ranked 5th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are working in cultural education and training9.2Ranked 14th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are working in design and creative services33.1Ranked 6th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are working in performance and celebration8Ranked 5th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are working in visual arts and crafts17.3Ranked 32nd· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in design and creative services that are females42.8Ranked 15th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in education and training that are females56.3Ranked 20th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in intangible cultural heritage that are females30Ranked 11th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in non cultural occupations that are working in intangible cultural heritage0.62Ranked 5th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in performance and celebration that are females40.8Ranked 9th· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in visual arts and crafts that are females41.5Ranked 25th· 2015
- Percentage of persons in cultural employment5.7Ranked 22nd· 2015
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 73rd▲ 17· 2022
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.94Ranked 49th▲ 4· 2022
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 48th· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, both sexes (%)71%Ranked 42nd· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, female (%)69.4%Ranked 43rd· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, male (%)72.7%Ranked 41st· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1.4Ranked 9th· 2014
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, both sexes (%)53.9%Ranked 44th▲ 14· 2022
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, female (%)55.3%Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2022
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, high socio-economic status, both sexes (%)52.7%Ranked 48th▲ 12· 2022
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, low socio-economic status, both sexes (%)54.9%Ranked 36th▲ 12· 2022
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, male (%)52.5%Ranked 48th▲ 12· 2022
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, both sexes (%)85.2%Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, female (%)83.7%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, male (%)86.8%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, both sexes (%)75.9%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2019
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, female (%)75.4%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2019
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, male (%)76.4%Ranked 37th▲ 7· 2019
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, rural, both sexes (%)88.3%Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, urban, both sexes (%)73%Ranked 34th▲ 7· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, both sexes (%)77.1%Ranked 64th▲ 3· 2022
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, female (%)76.1%Ranked 64th▲ 3· 2022
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, male (%)78%Ranked 63rd▲ 5· 2022
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, rural, both sexes (%)89.9%Ranked 49th▲ 14· 2022
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, urban, both sexes (%)74.7%Ranked 63rd▲ 6· 2022
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)79.7%Ranked 64th▲ 4· 2022
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)74.6%Ranked 59th▲ 3· 2022
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female (%)67.2%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 1996
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, both sexes79Ranked 37th· 2015
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, female78.4Ranked 38th· 2015
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, males81.1Ranked 35th· 2015
- Percentage of teachers in pre-primary education who are female (%)67%Ranked 48th▼ 5· 1996
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who are female (%)75.1%Ranked 89th▲ 6· 2022
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, both sexes76.4Ranked 32nd—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, female77.5Ranked 28th—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, male69Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education who are female (%)67.2%Ranked 8th—· 1996
- Percentage of teachers in tertiary education who are female (%)47.4%Ranked 36th▲ 10· 2016
- Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female (%)75.3%Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Percentage of total aid to education allocated to least developed countries (%)15.3%Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2024
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills (%)37%Ranked 5th· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 2nd· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.57Ranked 2nd· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, female (%)36%Ranked 5th· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, high socio-economic status (%)51%Ranked 11th· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, low socio-economic status (%)29%Ranked 7th· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, male (%)37%Ranked 7th· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, older adults(%)17%Ranked 1st· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, without tertiary education (%)21%Ranked 7th· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, with tertiary education (%)46%Ranked 13th· 2012
- Percentage of youth/adults who have achieved at least a minimum level of proficiency in digital literacy skills, younger adults (%)42%Ranked 7th· 2012
- Persistence to grade 5, female (% of cohort)99.5Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 1999
- Persistence to grade 5, male (% of cohort)98.3Ranked 11th▼ 1· 1999
- Persistence to grade 5, total (% of cohort)98.9Ranked 8th▼ 3· 1999
- Persistence to last grade of primary, female (% of cohort)98.9Ranked 14th▲ 7· 1999
- Persistence to last grade of primary, male (% of cohort)98.3Ranked 15th▼ 4· 1999
- Persistence to last grade of primary, total (% of cohort)98.6Ranked 14th▼ 1· 1999
- PISA mathematics scores for all students496.9Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2022
- PISA mathematics scores for all students496.9Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2022
- PISA mathematics scores for girls490.7Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2022
- PISA reading scores for girls519.5Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- PISA science scores for girls514.8Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2022
- Population aged 14 years or younger (thousands)6,009.7Ranked 64th▲ 4· 2025
- Population aged 15-24 years (thousands)4,631.8Ranked 56th▲ 2· 2025
- Population aged 25-64 years (thousands)21,306.2Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2025
- Population aged 65 years or older (thousands)7,998.7Ranked 20th—· 2025
- Population growth (annual %)3Ranked 15th▼ 7· 2024
- Population of compulsory school age, both sexes (number)4.45MRanked 45th▼ 6· 2025
- Population of compulsory school age, female (number)2.16MRanked 46th▼ 5· 2025
- Population of compulsory school age, male (number)2.28MRanked 44th▼ 6· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, both sexes (number)420,480Ranked 51st▼ 6· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, female (number)205,165Ranked 52nd▼ 6· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, male (number)215,315Ranked 51st▼ 6· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, both sexes (number)450,667Ranked 52nd▼ 6· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, female (number)218,957Ranked 51st▼ 8· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, male (number)231,710Ranked 51st▼ 7· 2025
- Population - Scenario: SSP2 - Sex: All - Age: 15+ - Education: None12,000Ranked 113th▼ 1· 2100
- Post Secondary29.58MRanked 26th—· 2100
- Poverty headcount ratio at $3.20 a day (PPP) (% of population)0.2%Ranked 3rd—· 2021
- PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $)1.1Ranked 134th▼ 8· 2024
- PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $)1.2Ranked 115th▼ 7· 2024
- Preprimary education, duration (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Prevalence of HIV, total (% of population ages 15-49)0.1%Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2022
- Price level ratio of PPP conversion factor (GDP) to market exchange rate0.83Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2024
- Primary completion rate, female (% of relevant age group)98.3Ranked 23rd· 2000
- Primary completion rate, male (% of relevant age group)98.2Ranked 22nd· 2000
- Primary education, duration (years)6Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Primary education, pupils2.43MRanked 49th▼ 1· 2023
- Primary education, pupils (% female)48.7Ranked 66th—· 2017
- Primary education, teachers141,045Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2000
- Primary education, teachers (% female)75.1Ranked 89th▲ 6· 2022
- Primary school86.8%Ranked 30th▲ 8· 2023
- Primary school age children out-of-school (%)0.04Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2016
- Primary school starting age (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Productivity: output per hour worked62Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of 15-24 year-olds enrolled in vocational education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, both sexes (%)7.3%Ranked 63rd▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, female (%)7%Ranked 61st▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, male (%)7.5%Ranked 67th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 38th▲ 8· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, both sexes (%)77.7%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, female (%)77.6%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, male (%)77.8%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 62nd▲ 3· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, both sexes (%)81.1%Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, female (%)85.1%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, male (%)77.3%Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 39th▼ 23· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, both sexes (%)64.6%Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, female (%)61.7%Ranked 24th▼ 8· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, male (%)70.2%Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 38th▲ 18· 2021
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, both sexes (%)98.6%Ranked 1st▼ 17· 2021
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, female (%)99%Ranked 1st▼ 15· 2021
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, male (%)98.3%Ranked 1st▼ 14· 2021
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional literacy skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 15th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional literacy skills, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.84Ranked 9th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional literacy skills, both sexes (%)83.5%Ranked 15th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional literacy skills, female (%)83.2%Ranked 16th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional literacy skills, immigrant background (%)72.9%Ranked 10th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional literacy skills, male (%)83.7%Ranked 14th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional literacy skills, non-immigrant background (%)87.1%Ranked 14th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional numeracy skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 17th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional numeracy skills, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.82Ranked 9th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional numeracy skills, both sexes (%)77.5%Ranked 16th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional numeracy skills, female (%)74.4%Ranked 17th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional numeracy skills, immigrant background (%)66.9%Ranked 10th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional numeracy skills, male (%)80.5%Ranked 16th· 2012
- Proportion of population achieving at least a fixed level of proficiency in functional numeracy skills, non-immigrant background (%)81.1%Ranked 16th· 2012
- Proportion of primary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)86.8%Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of secondary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)99%Ranked 10th▲ 9· 2022
- Proportion of secondary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)98.7%Ranked 13th—· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 37th▲ 9· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2018
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.62Ranked 10th▲ 6· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 63rd▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.98Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.99Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, both sexes (%)78.4%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)78.4%Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, female (%)78%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, immigrant background, both sexes (%)77.5%Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, male (%)78.7%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)79.1%Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, rural areas, both sexes (%)78.3%Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2018
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)78.9%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, urban areas, both sexes (%)85.1%Ranked 12th▲ 7· 2018
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)87.1%Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)54.4%Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 12th▲ 5· 2018
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.96Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.96Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.7Ranked 14th▲ 10· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, both sexes (%)81.9%Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)79.8%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, female (%)85.6%Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, immigrant background, both sexes (%)79.2%Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, male (%)78.2%Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)82.6%Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, rural areas, both sexes (%)80%Ranked 8th▲ 5· 2018
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)83%Ranked 11th▲ 5· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, urban areas, both sexes (%)87.7%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2018
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)88.2%Ranked 26th▲ 7· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)61.9%Ranked 15th▲ 8· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 49th▼ 21· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.84Ranked 20th▼ 10· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.78Ranked 15th▼ 7· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 46th▲ 16· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.95Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.98Ranked 10th▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, both sexes (%)64.7%Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)63.5%Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, female (%)61.7%Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, immigrant background, both sexes (%)65.7%Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, male (%)70.4%Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)68.8%Ranked 28th▲ 13· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, rural areas, both sexes (%)55.3%Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)64.7%Ranked 31st▲ 9· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, urban areas, both sexes (%)65.5%Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)73.6%Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)57.1%Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 13th▼ 11· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)1.1Ranked 19th· 2001
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)1Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.98Ranked 3rd▼ 21· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 1st▼ 21· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)98.2%Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, female (%)99.1%Ranked 1st▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, immigrant background, both sexes (%)98.3%Ranked 7th· 2001
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, male (%)98.5%Ranked 1st▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)92.6%Ranked 6th· 2001
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, rural areas, both sexes (%)99.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)98.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, urban areas, both sexes (%)98.9%Ranked 4th▼ 15· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)99.2%Ranked 2nd▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)97.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)61%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, female (%)58%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, male (%)64%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)51%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, female (%)52%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, male (%)51%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)14%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 75 years old or over, female (%)13%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 75 years old or over, male (%)15%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.88Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), both sexes (%)49%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), female (%)48%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), male (%)49%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.82Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, both sexes (%)44%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, female (%)46%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, male (%)42%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, both sexes (%)50%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, female (%)49%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, male (%)51%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)73%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, female (%)77%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, male (%)69%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)38%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, female (%)37%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, male (%)40%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.3Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)6%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 75 years old or over, female (%)3%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 75 years old or over, male (%)10%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 16th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.69Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), both sexes (%)40%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), female (%)38%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.73Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), male (%)41%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.66Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, both sexes (%)29%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, female (%)29%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, male (%)29%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, both sexes (%)42%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, female (%)40%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, male (%)44%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 33rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)74%Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, female (%)72%Ranked 10th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, male (%)75%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)83%Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, female (%)83%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, male (%)82%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)44%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, female (%)39%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, male (%)49%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 19th▲ 9· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, both sexes (%)78%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, female (%)77%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, male (%)78%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, both sexes (%)75%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, female (%)77%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, male (%)72%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 13th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, both sexes (%)78%Ranked 7th▲ 6· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, female (%)77%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, male (%)80%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 27th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)80%Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, female (%)81%Ranked 22nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, male (%)79%Ranked 21st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 23rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)80%Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, female (%)79%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, male (%)80%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.76Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)44%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, female (%)38%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, male (%)50%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 32nd▲ 12· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, both sexes (%)76%Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, female (%)75%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, male (%)78%Ranked 9th▼ 5· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 16th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, both sexes (%)72%Ranked 8th▲ 7· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, female (%)72%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, male (%)72%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 23rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, both sexes (%)77%Ranked 12th▲ 11· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, female (%)76%Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, male (%)79%Ranked 10th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)82%Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, female (%)86%Ranked 22nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, male (%)78%Ranked 27th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 22nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)66%Ranked 25th▲ 11· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, female (%)67%Ranked 25th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, male (%)65%Ranked 26th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.84Ranked 10th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)28%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, female (%)26%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, male (%)31%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 19th▲ 17· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), both sexes (%)65%Ranked 34th▲ 14· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), female (%)65%Ranked 28th▲ 11· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 16th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), male (%)64%Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.79Ranked 23rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, both sexes (%)56%Ranked 22nd▲ 20· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, female (%)60%Ranked 19th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, male (%)52%Ranked 21st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, both sexes (%)66%Ranked 21st▲ 18· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, female (%)67%Ranked 22nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, male (%)66%Ranked 22nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 14th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)90%Ranked 20th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, female (%)93%Ranked 16th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, male (%)88%Ranked 23rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 17th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)76%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, female (%)79%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, male (%)74%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)30%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, female (%)31%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, male (%)30%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 20th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 11th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, both sexes (%)74%Ranked 13th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, female (%)75%Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, male (%)72%Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.86Ranked 16th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, both sexes (%)70%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, female (%)74%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, male (%)64%Ranked 10th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, both sexes (%)75%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, female (%)76%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, male (%)74%Ranked 11th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.45Ranked 13th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)21%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, female (%)13%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, male (%)29%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.31Ranked 13th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)9%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, female (%)4%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, male (%)13%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.36Ranked 14th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.6Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), both sexes (%)9%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), female (%)5%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.6Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), male (%)14%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.53Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.38Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, both sexes (%)6%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, female (%)3%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, male (%)8%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.33Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, both sexes (%)10%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, female (%)5%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, male (%)15%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 25th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)76%Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, female (%)76%Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, male (%)75%Ranked 14th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 26th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)81%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, female (%)78%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, male (%)83%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.75Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)49%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, female (%)43%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, male (%)57%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 11th▲ 9· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, both sexes (%)77%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, female (%)74%Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 10th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, male (%)80%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 14th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 17th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, both sexes (%)70%Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, female (%)69%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, male (%)70%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 25th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, both sexes (%)78%Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, female (%)75%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, male (%)82%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)97%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, female (%)97%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, male (%)97%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)95%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, female (%)95%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, male (%)94%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)66%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, female (%)62%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, male (%)70%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), both sexes (%)92%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), female (%)92%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), male (%)92%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, both sexes (%)89%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, female (%)91%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, male (%)88%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, both sexes (%)93%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, female (%)92%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, male (%)93%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)87%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, female (%)86%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, male (%)87%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)79%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, female (%)79%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, male (%)79%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.75Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)34%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 75 years old or over, female (%)30%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 75 years old or over, male (%)40%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, both sexes (%)75%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, female (%)74%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, male (%)77%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.86Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, both sexes (%)70%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, female (%)71%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, male (%)68%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, both sexes (%)77%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, female (%)75%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, male (%)79%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 29th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)68%Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, female (%)71%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, male (%)65%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 32nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)73%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, female (%)75%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, male (%)70%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)45%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, female (%)44%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, male (%)47%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 33rd▲ 14· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), both sexes (%)69%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), female (%)71%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), male (%)67%Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.87Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 21st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, both sexes (%)64%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, female (%)68%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, male (%)60%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 24th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, both sexes (%)70%Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, female (%)72%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, male (%)69%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, both sexes (%)8%Ranked 21st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)57%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, female (%)60%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, male (%)54%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 15th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)50%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, female (%)47%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, male (%)53%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.39Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)12%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, female (%)7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, male (%)18%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 17th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.76Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, both sexes (%)47%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, female (%)44%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.8Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, male (%)50%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.73Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, both sexes (%)37%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, female (%)37%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, male (%)38%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, both sexes (%)49%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, female (%)46%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, male (%)52%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 15th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)73%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, female (%)72%Ranked 11th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, male (%)74%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)63%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, female (%)61%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, male (%)64%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.55Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)23%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, female (%)17%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, male (%)31%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 16th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.87Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), both sexes (%)60%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), female (%)57%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), male (%)63%Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.83Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, both sexes (%)53%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, female (%)53%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, male (%)54%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, both sexes (%)61%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, female (%)58%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, male (%)65%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)86%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, female (%)87%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, male (%)85%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)68%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, female (%)67%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, male (%)68%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)26%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, female (%)20%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, male (%)32%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.84Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, both sexes (%)66%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, female (%)65%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.89Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, male (%)67%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.79Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, both sexes (%)57%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, female (%)59%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, male (%)55%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, both sexes (%)68%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, female (%)66%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, male (%)70%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)93.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)94%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)93%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)82.8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)84%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)81%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)40.1%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)39%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)42%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, both sexes (%)80.1%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, female (%)80.8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, male (%)79.3%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.89Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, both sexes (%)75.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, female (%)79%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, male (%)72%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, both sexes (%)81.1%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, female (%)81%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, male (%)81%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)79.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)82%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)77%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)61.8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)61%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)63%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.55Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)21.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)16%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)29%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.84Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, both sexes (%)60.3%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, female (%)58.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.88Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, male (%)61.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.8Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, rural, both sexes (%)51.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, rural, female (%)53%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, rural, male (%)51%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, urban, both sexes (%)62.1%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, urban, female (%)60%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, urban, male (%)64%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)80.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)83%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)78%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)81%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)81%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)81%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)46.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)42%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)52%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, both sexes (%)77.6%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, female (%)77%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, male (%)78.2%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.89Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, rural, both sexes (%)72%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, rural, female (%)73%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, rural, male (%)71%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, urban, both sexes (%)78.8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, urban, female (%)78%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, urban, male (%)80%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)70%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)69%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)71%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)73.3%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)73%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)73%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)29.5%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)24%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)36%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, both sexes (%)68.6%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, female (%)67.5%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, male (%)69.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, rural, both sexes (%)65.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, rural, female (%)67%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, rural, male (%)64%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, urban, both sexes (%)69.3%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, urban, female (%)68%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, urban, male (%)71%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)60%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)57%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)63%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)50.8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)51%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)50%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)13.2%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)12%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)15%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.88Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, both sexes (%)48.2%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, female (%)47.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, male (%)48.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.8Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, rural, both sexes (%)43.5%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, rural, female (%)45%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, rural, male (%)41%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, urban, both sexes (%)49.3%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, urban, female (%)48%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, urban, male (%)51%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)4.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)4%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)12.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)11%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)13%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.84Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)27.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)26%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)31%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, both sexes (%)12.8%Ranked 13th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, female (%)12%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, male (%)13.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.71Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, both sexes (%)14.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, female (%)12%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, rural, male (%)17%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, both sexes (%)12.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, female (%)12%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, urban, male (%)13%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)7.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)7%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)9.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)10%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)10%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, both sexes (%)9.1%Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, female (%)9.3%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, male (%)8.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, rural, both sexes (%)10%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, rural, female (%)10%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, rural, male (%)10%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, urban, both sexes (%)8.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, urban, female (%)9%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, urban, male (%)9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)10.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)10%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)11%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)10.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)11%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)10%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)14.5%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)14%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)15%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, both sexes (%)11%Ranked 11th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, female (%)11%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, male (%)10.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, rural, both sexes (%)13%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, rural, female (%)13%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, rural, male (%)13%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, urban, both sexes (%)10.5%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, urban, female (%)10%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, urban, male (%)11%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)17.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)18%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)18%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)15.3%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)16%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)15%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)20.6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)20%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)22%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, both sexes (%)16.1%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, female (%)16.4%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, male (%)15.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, rural, both sexes (%)17.2%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, rural, female (%)17%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, rural, male (%)18%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, urban, both sexes (%)15.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, urban, female (%)16%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, urban, male (%)15%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)31.3%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, female (%)34%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 15-24 years old, male (%)29%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)34.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, female (%)34%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 25-74 years old, male (%)35%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)31.1%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, female (%)29%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, 75 years old or over, male (%)34%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, both sexes (%)33.7%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, female (%)33.5%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, male (%)33.9%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, rural, both sexes (%)34.8%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, rural, female (%)34%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, rural, male (%)36%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, urban, both sexes (%)33.4%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, urban, female (%)33%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, urban, male (%)33%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 33rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)44%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, female (%)42%Ranked 10th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, male (%)45%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 33rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)35%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, female (%)34%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, male (%)36%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)7%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, female (%)6%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, male (%)7%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 33rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.74Ranked 11th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), both sexes (%)33%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), female (%)32%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.82Ranked 9th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), male (%)35%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.7Ranked 11th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 20th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, both sexes (%)26%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, female (%)27%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, male (%)26%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 25th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, both sexes (%)35%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, female (%)33%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, male (%)37%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 36th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)79%Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, female (%)80%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, male (%)79%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 23rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)78%Ranked 1st▼ 7· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, female (%)78%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, male (%)78%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 7th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)34%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, female (%)28%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, male (%)42%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 29th▲ 18· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, both sexes (%)74%Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, female (%)73%Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, male (%)75%Ranked 1st▼ 8· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, both sexes (%)70%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, female (%)71%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, male (%)69%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 21st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, both sexes (%)75%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, female (%)73%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, male (%)76%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)46%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, female (%)42%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, male (%)49%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 10th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)38%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, female (%)35%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, male (%)40%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 4th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)12%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 75 years old or over, female (%)10%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 75 years old or over, male (%)15%Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 12th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.89Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, both sexes (%)36%Ranked 8th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, female (%)33%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, male (%)39%Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 5th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, both sexes (%)33%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, female (%)31%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, male (%)34%Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 6th· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, both sexes (%)37%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, female (%)34%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, male (%)40%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Public spending on education as a share of GDP4.8%Ranked 52nd▼ 15· 2022
- Pupils below minimum reading proficiency at end of primary (%). Low GAML threshold4.3Ranked 24th▼ 14· 2016
- Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary19Ranked 14th▲ 2· 1996
- Pupil-teacher ratio, preprimary39.6Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1996
- Pupil-teacher ratio, primary17.4Ranked 114th▼ 11· 2000
- Pupil-teacher ratio, secondary18.8Ranked 21st▼ 4· 1996
- Pupil-teacher ratio, tertiary9.2Ranked 81st▼ 8· 2016
- Pupil-teacher ratio, upper secondary9.7Ranked 72nd▼ 8· 2017
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 127th—· 2011
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 121st▲ 1· 2011
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 122nd▼ 3· 2011
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 110th▲ 3· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 102nd▲ 5· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 102nd▲ 3· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 109th▲ 5· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 101st▲ 4· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 102nd▲ 6· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 107th▲ 4· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 99th▲ 5· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 100th▲ 5· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 80th▲ 3· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 79th▲ 1· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 69th▲ 1· 2000
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 69th—· 2000
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2019
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2019
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, male (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2019
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2020
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 5· 2020
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2020
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number)0Ranked 138th▲ 4· 2011
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number)0Ranked 135th▲ 5· 2011
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, male (number)0Ranked 136th▲ 6· 2011
- Repeaters, primary, female (% of female enrollment)0Ranked 131st▼ 1· 2011
- Repeaters, primary, male (% of male enrollment)0Ranked 131st▼ 1· 2011
- Repeaters, primary, total (% of total enrollment)0Ranked 136th▲ 2· 2011
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 113th▼ 4· 2010
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 109th—· 2010
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 110th—· 2010
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 91st▲ 29· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 80th▲ 24· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 80th▲ 24· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 90th▲ 30· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 79th▲ 26· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 79th▲ 26· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 86th▲ 27· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 76th▲ 25· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 76th▲ 25· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 67th▲ 24· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 58th▲ 21· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 59th▲ 22· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 6 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 55th▲ 14· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 6 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 50th▲ 16· 1999
- Repetition rate in Grade 6 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 50th▲ 16· 1999
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), both sexes (%)0%Ranked 124th▲ 3· 2010
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), female (%)0%Ranked 122nd▲ 3· 2010
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), male (%)0%Ranked 122nd▲ 3· 2010
- Rural population (% of total population)18%Ranked 160th▼ 1· 2024
- School age population, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (number)1.1MRanked 15th▼ 5· 2025
- School age population, early childhood educational development programmes, female (number)534,941Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2025
- School age population, early childhood educational development programmes, male (number)562,465Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2025
- School age population, early childhood education, both sexes (number)2.28MRanked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, early childhood education, female (number)1.11MRanked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, early childhood education, male (number)1.17MRanked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, both sexes (number)448,767Ranked 52nd▼ 7· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, female (number)218,606Ranked 51st▼ 8· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, male (number)230,161Ranked 52nd▼ 7· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, both sexes (number)1.35MRanked 55th▼ 9· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, female (number)656,069Ranked 55th▼ 9· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, male (number)694,674Ranked 55th▼ 8· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (number)407,858Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, female (number)199,464Ranked 56th▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, male (number)208,394Ranked 56th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, both sexes (number)954,063Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, female (number)459,045Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, male (number)495,018Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, both sexes (number)1.19MRanked 51st▼ 6· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, female (number)578,778Ranked 51st▼ 7· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, male (number)607,040Ranked 51st▼ 6· 2025
- School age population, primary education, both sexes (number)2.64MRanked 50th▼ 6· 2025
- School age population, primary education, female (number)1.29MRanked 50th▼ 6· 2025
- School age population, primary education, male (number)1.35MRanked 50th▼ 6· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, both sexes (number)2.73MRanked 52nd▼ 8· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, female (number)1.32MRanked 52nd▼ 8· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, male (number)1.4MRanked 52nd▼ 8· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, both sexes (number)2.58MRanked 42nd▼ 7· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, female (number)1.23MRanked 43rd▼ 6· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, male (number)1.35MRanked 41st▼ 8· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, both sexes (number)1.38MRanked 47th▼ 9· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, female (number)668,178Ranked 48th▼ 8· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, male (number)707,838Ranked 47th▼ 9· 2025
- School enrollment, preprimary, female (% gross)48.6Ranked 104th▲ 5· 2020
- School enrollment, preprimary (% gross)48.9Ranked 105th▲ 3· 2020
- School enrollment, preprimary, male (% gross)49.3Ranked 102nd▲ 4· 2020
- School enrollment, primary and secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1Ranked 62nd—· 2020
- School enrollment, primary, female (% gross)95.1Ranked 125th▼ 1· 2023
- School enrollment, primary, female (% net)99Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 1998
- School enrollment, primary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)0.99Ranked 86th▲ 2· 2020
- School enrollment, primary, male (% gross)94.9Ranked 124th▼ 4· 2023
- School enrollment, primary, male (% net)99Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 1998
- School enrollment, primary (% net)99.9Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2017
- School enrollment, primary, private (% of total primary)6.7Ranked 83rd▲ 6· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, female (% gross)104.5Ranked 35th▲ 7· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, female (% net)100Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2017
- School enrollment, secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2020
- School enrollment, secondary, male (% gross)104.2Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, male (% net)99.6Ranked 2nd—· 2017
- School enrollment, secondary (% net)99.8Ranked 2nd—· 2017
- School enrollment, secondary, private (% of total secondary)9Ranked 82nd▲ 6· 2023
- School enrollment, tertiary, female (% gross)88.6Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2023
- School enrollment, tertiary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1.3Ranked 60th▲ 2· 2023
- School enrollment, tertiary, male (% gross)64.8Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 34th· 2000
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, both sexes (years)0.75Ranked 10th· 2000
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, female (years)0.66Ranked 10th· 2000
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, male (years)0.83Ranked 5th· 2000
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 115th▲ 19· 2023
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, both sexes (years)1.4Ranked 107th—· 2023
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, female (years)1.4Ranked 106th—· 2023
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, male (years)1.4Ranked 106th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 53rd▲ 4· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 52nd▲ 7· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (years)8.7Ranked 91st—· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female (years)8.7Ranked 92nd▲ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, male (years)8.7Ranked 93rd▼ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 73rd▲ 14· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, both sexes (years)11.9Ranked 71st▲ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, female (years)11.9Ranked 68th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, male (years)11.9Ranked 68th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, both sexes (years)5.7Ranked 103rd▲ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, female (years)5.7Ranked 103rd▲ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, male (years)5.7Ranked 104th▲ 5· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 41st▲ 7· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, both sexes (years)15.5Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, female (years)16.1Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, male (years)14.9Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 89th▲ 18· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, both sexes (years)6.2Ranked 69th▲ 5· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, female (years)6.2Ranked 70th▲ 9· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, male (years)6.2Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 64th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes (years)3.6Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, female (years)4.2Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, male (years)3.1Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2023
- Score on greening education in biodiversity49.1Ranked 24th· 2023
- Score on greening education in biodiversity (%)49.1Ranked 24th· 2023
- Score on greening education in climate change32.6Ranked 33rd· 2023
- Score on greening education in climate change (%)32.6Ranked 33rd· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability65.4Ranked 32nd· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability (%)65.4Ranked 32nd· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability, climate change, and biodiversity53.1Ranked 19th· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability, climate change, and biodiversity (%)53.1Ranked 19th· 2023
- Secondary education, duration (years)6Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Secondary education, general pupils2.52MRanked 36th▲ 2· 2017
- Secondary education, general pupils (% female)49.1Ranked 110th▼ 2· 2017
- Secondary education, pupils2.7MRanked 34th▲ 1· 2023
- Secondary education, pupils (% female)48.9Ranked 71st▼ 4· 2017
- Secondary education, teachers133,275Ranked 15th▼ 4· 1996
- Secondary education, teachers (% female)67.2Ranked 8th—· 1996
- Secondary education, teachers, female89,558Ranked 11th▼ 1· 1996
- Secondary education, vocational pupils128,399Ranked 52nd▲ 1· 2017
- Secondary education, vocational pupils (% female)45.9Ranked 38th▼ 6· 2017
- Share of 25-64 year olds with incomplete tertiary education51.3%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 9th▲ 5· 2000
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)26.3%Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2000
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)35.4%Ranked 20th▲ 6· 2000
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)19.4%Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2000
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2000
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)73.7%Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2000
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)64.6%Ranked 13th—· 2000
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)80.6%Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2000
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 96th▲ 11· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)95.6%Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)95.7%Ranked 29th—· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)95.4%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)4.4%Ranked 102nd▲ 8· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)4.3%Ranked 88th▲ 12· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)4.6%Ranked 100th▲ 15· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)0%Ranked 26th▲ 5· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)0%Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 96th▲ 7· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)91.5%Ranked 22nd▼ 8· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)91.8%Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)91.3%Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 22nd▲ 5· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)8.5%Ranked 104th▲ 10· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)8.2%Ranked 94th▲ 11· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)8.7%Ranked 99th▲ 12· 2023
- Share of children achieving minimum math proficiency by the end of lower secondary age77.7%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of children achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of lower secondary age81.1%Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Share of children achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of primary age98.6%Ranked 1st▼ 17· 2021
- Share of population with no education0.4%Ranked 89th▲ 4· 2020
- Share of population with some formal education99.6%Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2020
- Share of primary school teachers who are women75.1%Ranked 89th▲ 6· 2022
- Share of students achieving minimum math proficiency by the end of primary education64.7%Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2023
- Share of students achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of lower secondary education81.9%Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Share of students achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of primary education98.8%Ranked 1st▼ 21· 2021
- Share of students at the end of lower-secondary education with minimum math proficiency78.4%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of students at the end of primary education with minimum math proficiency65%Ranked 18th▼ 12· 2023
- Share of students studying abroad2.8%Ranked 84th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of the population aged 25+ years with lower secondary education96.4%Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2024
- Share of the population aged 25+ years with post-secondary education or higher68.8%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of young women not in education, employment or training10.8%Ranked 59th▼ 26· 2023
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training13%Ranked 7th▼ 48· 2024
- SSP1 scenario1.2Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2100
- Start month of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non-tertiary education)9Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2025
- Start month of the academic school year (tertiary education)9Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Start of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non tertiary education)2,024Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Start of the academic school year (tertiary education)2,022Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Student assessment0.83Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Students in lower-secondary, math78.4%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 29th▲ 11· 1999
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (%)99.1%Ranked 13th▼ 3· 1999
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 10· 1999
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male (%)98.3%Ranked 19th▲ 1· 1999
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 28th▲ 11· 1999
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, both sexes (%)98.9%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 1999
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, female (%)99.5%Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 1999
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, male (%)98.3%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 1999
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education,adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 52nd▲ 33· 1999
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%)98.6%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 1999
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, female (%)98.9%Ranked 14th▲ 7· 1999
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, male (%)98.3%Ranked 15th▼ 4· 1999
- Teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes (number)66,312Ranked 13th—· 1996
- Teachers in lower secondary education, female (number)44,551Ranked 11th—· 1996
- Teachers in lower secondary education, male (number)21,761Ranked 13th—· 1996
- Teachers in pre-primary education, both sexes (number)12,880Ranked 27th▼ 1· 1996
- Teachers in pre-primary education, female (number)8,628Ranked 23rd▼ 5· 1996
- Teachers in pre-primary education, male (number)4,252Ranked 6th—· 1996
- Teachers in primary education, both sexes (number)141,045Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2000
- Teachers in primary education, female (number)96,008Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2000
- Teachers in primary education, male (number)45,037Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2000
- Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number)133,275Ranked 15th▼ 4· 1996
- Teachers in secondary education, female (number)89,558Ranked 11th▼ 1· 1996
- Teachers in secondary education, male (number)43,717Ranked 16th▼ 1· 1996
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, both sexes (number)173,685Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2016
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, female (number)82,315Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2016
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, male (number)91,370Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2016
- Teachers in upper secondary education, both sexes (number)149,698.3Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Teachers in upper secondary education, female (number)112,756.2Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Teachers in upper secondary education, male (number)36,942.1Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)33.6%Ranked 8th· 1998
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)60.4%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2000
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)47.7%Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)33%Ranked 25th▼ 4· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)57.5%Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2022
- Tertiary education, academic staff (% female)47.4Ranked 36th▲ 10· 2016
- Theoretical duration of early childhood educational development (years)3Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of early childhood education (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of lower secondary education (years)3Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of post-secondary non-tertiary education (years)2Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of pre-primary education (years)3Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of primary education (years)6Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of secondary education (years)6Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of upper secondary education (years)3Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, both sexes (number)389,181Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, female (number)180,024Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, male (number)209,157Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 57th· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female (%)98.8%Ranked 11th· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male (%)98.7%Ranked 15th· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 57th▲ 12· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, both sexes (%)95%Ranked 97th▲ 3· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, female (%)95.1%Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, male (%)94.9%Ranked 50th▼ 6· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 114th▲ 14· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes (%)84.6%Ranked 67th▼ 3· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female (%)84.1%Ranked 69th▲ 3· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male (%)85%Ranked 55th▲ 3· 2023
- Total number of indoor cinemas681Ranked 11th—· 2008
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)52,121Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, female (UIS estimate) (number)28,197Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, male (UIS estimate) (number)23,924Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2023
- Total per capita public expenditure at national/federal level on cultural and natural heritage (constant PPP$ - 2017)86.4Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2024
- Total per capita public expenditure at regional level on cultural and natural heritage (constant PPP$ - 2017)129.9Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2024
- Total per capita public expenditure on cultural and natural heritage (constant PPP$ - 2017)212.3Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2024
- Total population (thousands)39,946.4Ranked 38th—· 2025
- Years of schooling13.8Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
Population
- Population41.65MRanked 38th▲ 1· 2025
- Population growth0.94%Ranked 104th▲ 91· 2025
- Urban population82.9%Ranked 40th—· 2025
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 179th▲ 4· 2024
- Crude birth rate8.9Ranked 164th▼ 6· 2024
- 1.3.1 - [ILO] Proportion of population covered by at least one social protection benefit, by sex (%) - SI_COV_BENFTS - Both sexes95.6%Ranked 7th▲ 6· 2022
- 16.b.1 - Proportion of population reporting having felt discriminated against, by grounds of discrimination, sex and disability (%) - VC_VOV_GDSD - No breakdown by disability - All grounds or no breakdown - All areas - Both sexes15.7%Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2020
- <1 year0Ranked 148th▼ 1· 2021
- 2G99.7%Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2023
- 3.6.1 - Death rate due to road traffic injuries, by sex (per 100,000 population) - SH_STA_TRAF - Both sexes5.3Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2019
- Above $10 a day37.13MRanked 16th▼ 2· 2019
- Above $10 a day38.62MRanked 15th▲ 1· 2022
- Above $40 a day31.58MRanked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Above $40 a day31.58MRanked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, female (% of population ages 15+)98.8Ranked 11th▲ 6· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, male (% of population ages 15+)98.1Ranked 18th▲ 13· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider (% of population ages 15+)98.4Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider (% of population ages 15+)98.4%Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, older adults (% of population ages 25+)98.2Ranked 21st▲ 13· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, poorest 40% (% of population ages 15+)98.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, richest 60% (% of population ages 15+)98.3Ranked 22nd▲ 16· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, young adults (% of population ages 15-24)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Adolescent birth rate (per 1,000 women aged 15-19 and 10-14 years) - 10 to 14 years old0.05Ranked 38th▼ 12· 2022
- Adolescent fertility rate (births per 1,000 women ages 15-19)4.5Ranked 189th—· 2024
- Adoscent birth rate4.5Ranked 72nd▼ 13· 2022
- Age dependency ratio (% of working-age population)54.4Ranked 115th▼ 8· 2025
- Age dependency ratio, old (% of working-age population)31.3Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2025
- Age dependency ratio, young (% of working-age population)23.1Ranked 175th▲ 1· 2025
- Age-standardized death rate from self-inflicted injuries per 100,000 population - Sex: Both sexes - Age group: all ages8.2Ranked 39th▼ 9· 2022
- Alcohol, abstainers lifetime (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes14.2%Ranked 146th▲ 1· 2020
- Alcohol use disorders, 12-month prevalence (%) - Both sexes8%Ranked 17th· 2016
- Annual change in population477,839Ranked 42nd▼ 7· 2023
- Annual growth rate of the share of population in cities with 300,000 or more people0.38%Ranked 90th—· 2020
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, bottom 40% of population (%)1.9%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Armed forces personnel (% of total population)0.19%Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2020
- Average annual rate of change of the urban share0.21%Ranked 129th▲ 5· 2025
- Babies per woman, total fertility1.5Ranked 67th▲ 5· 2100
- Below $30 per day3.54MRanked 46th▼ 9· 2022
- Below $3 a day116,808Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2022
- Below working age6.01MRanked 63rd—· 2025
- Birth rate9.1Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2023
- Birth rate9.1Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2023
- Birth rate9.1Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2023
- Births451.8Ranked 50th—· 2100
- Births15194.2Ranked 80th▼ 2· 2100
- CBR8.4Ranked 138th▲ 5· 2100
- CDR10.4Ranked 160th▲ 1· 2100
- Census based on population register within 10 years0Ranked 2nd—· 2015
- Census was run within 10 years1Ranked 1st—· 2015
- Central death rate at birth4.3Ranked 45th—· 2023
- Central death rate at birth3.8Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Central death rate at birth3.8Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Central death rate at birth4.8Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2023
- CNMR5.3Ranked 1st—· 2100
- Completeness of birth registration (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Completeness of birth registration, female (%)100Ranked 1st· 2019
- Completeness of birth registration, male (%)100Ranked 1st· 2019
- Completeness of death registration with cause-of-death information (%)100Ranked 10th▼ 16· 2015
- Contraceptive prevalence, any method (% of married women ages 15-49)80Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 1998
- Contraceptive prevalence, any method (% of married women ages 15-49)80%Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 1998
- Contraceptive prevalence, any modern method (% of married women ages 15-49)73.3%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1995
- Contraceptive prevalence, any modern method (% of married women ages 15-49)73.3Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1995
- Countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Countries with migration policies to facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, by policy domain (1 = Requires further progress; 2 = Partially meets; 3 = Meets; 4 = Fully meets) - All Domains3Ranked 2nd—· 2021
- Couple with children26.5%Ranked 16th▼ 24· 2016
- Crude death rate: the share of the population that dies each year0.81Ranked 100th▼ 15· 2021
- Death rate7.9Ranked 127th▼ 8· 2023
- Death rate, crude (per 1,000 people)7.9Ranked 128th▼ 4· 2024
- Deaths558.2Ranked 170th▲ 1· 2100
- DeathsFemale272.9Ranked 171st▲ 2· 2100
- DeathsMale285.3Ranked 170th▲ 1· 2100
- Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79)7.7%Ranked 81st▲ 34· 2024
- DoublingTime135.1Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2036
- Effective reproductive fertility rate1.3Ranked 185th▼ 1· 2023
- Emigrant stock share (% of population)3.4Ranked 130th▲ 3· 2024
- Employment rate60.1%Ranked 71st▲ 2· 2025
- Female92.5%Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2024
- Female92.5%Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2024
- Female employment rate56.3%Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2025
- Female employment rate57.1%Ranked 22nd▼ 4· 2025
- Female employment rate57.5%Ranked 22nd—· 2024
- Female labor force participation rate61.1%Ranked 19th▼ 5· 2025
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 5· 2024
- Fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 5· 2024
- Fertility rate among adolescent girls aged 15 to 194.8Ranked 187th▲ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman1.3Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Growth rate among the total population1.8%Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Historical estimates39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Historical numeracy estimates99.9%Ranked 5th▲ 4· 1960
- Homicide rate in both sexes in age 0-19 per 100,000 population0.44Ranked 29th▼ 10· 2022
- Homicide rate in both sexes in all ages per 100,000 population0.8Ranked 22nd▼ 17· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2Ranked 42nd▼ 10· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2Ranked 42nd▼ 10· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2Ranked 42nd▼ 10· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2Ranked 42nd▼ 10· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of female victims1Ranked 45th▼ 3· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims2.9Ranked 42nd▼ 14· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims2.9Ranked 42nd▼ 14· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims where the perpetrator is an intimate partner0.09Ranked 20th▲ 4· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population where the weapon was a firearm0.74Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2023
- Illiterate2.5%Ranked 22nd▲ 16· 1950
- IMR0.85Ranked 176th—· 2100
- InfantDeaths0.39Ranked 74th▼ 2· 2100
- International migrant stock (% of population)22.2Ranked 42nd▲ 4· 2024
- Land use: Built-up area9,052.8Ranked 15th—· 2025
- LBsurvivingAge1451.5Ranked 50th—· 2100
- LE1576.9Ranked 22nd—· 2100
- LE15Female78.6Ranked 22nd—· 2100
- LE15Male75.1Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2100
- LE6527.9Ranked 19th—· 2100
- LE65Female29.3Ranked 21st—· 2100
- LE65Male26.5Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2100
- LE8014.3Ranked 24th—· 2100
- LE80Female15.3Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2100
- LE80Male13.2Ranked 23rd—· 2100
- Less than $3 a day0.3%Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2022
- LEx91.7Ranked 23rd—· 2100
- LExFemale93.5Ranked 22nd—· 2100
- LExMale90Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2100
- Life expectancy at birth, female (years)84.3Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2024
- Life expectancy at birth, male (years)80Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2024
- MAC31.9Ranked 43rd—· 2100
- Male employment rate64%Ranked 103rd▲ 3· 2025
- Mean age at childbearing31.4Ranked 31st—· 2023
- Median age40.3Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2023
- Median age40.3Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2023
- MedianAgePop46.9Ranked 109th▲ 1· 2100
- Military personnel as a share of total population0.18%Ranked 114th—· 2016
- Modern method73.3%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 1995
- Mortality rate, adult, female (per 1,000 female adults)54.9Ranked 47th▼ 3· 2023
- Mortality rate, adult, male (per 1,000 male adults)95.5Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2023
- Mortality rate, infant, female (per 1,000 live births)4.3Ranked 23rd—· 2024
- Mortality rate, infant, male (per 1,000 live births)5.1Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2024
- NatChange-106.4Ranked 182nd—· 2100
- NatChangeRT-2Ranked 88th▼ 1· 2100
- Natural population growth rate0.11%Ranked 155th▼ 7· 2023
- Natural population growth rate0.11%Ranked 155th▼ 7· 2023
- Natural population growth rate0.11%Ranked 155th▼ 7· 2023
- Net migration326,204Ranked 5th—· 2025
- NetMigrations281.7Ranked 2nd—· 2100
- New infections of HIV per 1,000 people0.09Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2022
- NRR0.72Ranked 186th▲ 4· 2100
- Number of 1-year-old girls181,300Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of births356,745Ranked 66th—· 2023
- Number of births356,745Ranked 66th—· 2023
- Number of births to women aged 50 to 5415Ranked 71st▼ 1· 2023
- Number of boys under 5962,992Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 156.01MRanked 61st▼ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 156.01MRanked 61st▼ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 51.88MRanked 63rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 52.33MRanked 50th—· 2100
- Number of children under 51.88MRanked 63rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of cities with 1 to 5 million people5Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2035
- Number of cities with 300000 to 500000 people7Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2035
- Number of cities with 500000 to 1 million people5Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2035
- Number of cities with 5 to 10 million people1Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2035
- Number of cities with more than 10 million people0Ranked 5th—· 2035
- Number of cities with more than 1 million people6Ranked 14th—· 2035
- Number of deaths311,827Ranked 183rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of deaths311,827Ranked 183rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of deaths311,827Ranked 183rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of deaths311,827Ranked 183rd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of deaths among people aged 100 and over5,599Ranked 120th▲ 5· 2023
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)0Ranked 1st· 2021
- Number of emigrants1.35MRanked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- Number of girls under 5916,218Ranked 65th—· 2023
- Number of homicide victims among children (0-19) per 100,000 population2Ranked 4th· 2015
- Number of people aged 65 and over7.59MRanked 20th—· 2023
- Number of people aged 65 and over7.59MRanked 20th—· 2023
- Number of people aged 65 and over7.59MRanked 20th—· 2023
- Number of people in poverty ($3 a day)116,808Ranked 31st▼ 6· 2022
- Number of people in poverty ($3 a day)116,808Ranked 31st▼ 6· 2022
- Old-age dependency ratio29.6%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Old-age dependency ratio29.6%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Open defecation0Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- Outsurvival statistic at birth39.9%Ranked 102nd▼ 41· 2023
- PopChange175.2Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2100
- PopDensity5.9Ranked 210th—· 2100
- PopGrowthRate0.33Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2100
- PopSexRatio100.1Ranked 85th▲ 1· 2100
- Population39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Population39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Population39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Population53.61MRanked 45th—· 2100
- Population39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Population39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Population39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Population53.9MRanked 45th—· 2100
- Population39.3MRanked 38th—· 2023
- Population ages 00-04, female (% of female population)4.6Ranked 171st▼ 5· 2025
- Population ages 00-04, male (% of male population)4.9Ranked 173rd▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, female3.05MRanked 60th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, female (% of female population)14.5Ranked 176th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, male3.19MRanked 60th—· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, male (% of male population)15.4Ranked 179th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 0-14 (% of total population)15Ranked 180th—· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, total6.24MRanked 60th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 05-09, female (% of female population)4.9Ranked 179th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 05-09, male (% of male population)5.2Ranked 181st▼ 4· 2025
- Population ages 10-14, female (% of female population)5.1Ranked 181st▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 10-14, male (% of male population)5.4Ranked 183rd—· 2025
- Population ages 15-19, female (% of female population)5.4Ranked 175th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 15-19, male (% of male population)5.6Ranked 184th▲ 3· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, female13.39MRanked 37th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, female (% of female population)63.9Ranked 107th▲ 11· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, male13.58MRanked 37th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, male (% of male population)65.7Ranked 106th▲ 9· 2025
- Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)64.8Ranked 103rd▲ 8· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, total26.97MRanked 37th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 20-24, female (% of female population)5.9Ranked 161st▲ 5· 2025
- Population ages 20-24, male (% of male population)6.2Ranked 161st▲ 4· 2025
- Population ages 25-29, female (% of female population)6.7Ranked 138th—· 2025
- Population ages 25-29, male (% of male population)7.3Ranked 118th—· 2025
- Population ages 30-34, female (% of female population)6.9Ranked 114th—· 2025
- Population ages 30-34, male (% of male population)7.4Ranked 90th▼ 14· 2025
- Population ages 35-39, female (% of female population)6.9Ranked 102nd▲ 4· 2025
- Population ages 35-39, male (% of male population)7.2Ranked 99th—· 2025
- Population ages 40-44, female (% of female population)6.8Ranked 84th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 40-44, male (% of male population)6.9Ranked 91st—· 2025
- Population ages 45-49, female (% of female population)6.3Ranked 85th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 45-49, male (% of male population)6.3Ranked 95th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 50-54, female (% of female population)6.1Ranked 93rd▲ 7· 2025
- Population ages 50-54, male (% of male population)6Ranked 90th▲ 4· 2025
- Population ages 55-59, female (% of female population)6.2Ranked 73rd▲ 7· 2025
- Population ages 55-59, male (% of male population)6.1Ranked 71st▲ 5· 2025
- Population ages 60-64, female (% of female population)6.8Ranked 46th▲ 5· 2025
- Population ages 60-64, male (% of male population)6.7Ranked 31st—· 2025
- Population ages 65-69, female (% of female population)6.3Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2025
- Population ages 65-69, male (% of male population)6Ranked 23rd—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, female4.53MRanked 21st—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, female (% of female population)21.6Ranked 42nd—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, male3.9MRanked 19th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, male (% of male population)18.9Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above (% of total population)20.3Ranked 37th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, total8.44MRanked 20th—· 2025
- Population ages 70-74, female (% of female population)5.3Ranked 38th—· 2025
- Population ages 70-74, male (% of male population)4.9Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 75-79, female (% of female population)4.2Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 75-79, male (% of male population)3.8Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2025
- Population ages 80 and above, female (% of female population)5.8Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 80 and above, male (% of male population)4.2Ranked 23rd—· 2025
- Population census recently completed1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Population density6.1Ranked 209th—· 2100
- Population, female20.97MRanked 37th—· 2025
- Population, female (% of total population)50.3Ranked 111th—· 2025
- Population, female (% of total population)50.3%Ranked 109th—· 2025
- Population growth rate0.33%Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2100
- Population growth rate0.33%Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2100
- Population growth rate1.2%Ranked 91st▼ 10· 2023
- Population growth rate1.2%Ranked 91st▼ 10· 2023
- Population living in cities with 1 million or more people10.54MRanked 30th▼ 1· 2020
- Population living in rural areas9.07MRanked 39th—· 2020
- Population (Maddison)38,684.6Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2022
- Population, male20.68MRanked 39th—· 2025
- Population, male (% of total population)49.7Ranked 107th—· 2025
- Population (projections)53.61MRanked 45th—· 2100
- Population register implemented0Ranked 2nd—· 2015
- Population share in urban areas85.2%Ranked 31st—· 2025
- Population, total41.65MRanked 38th▲ 1· 2025
- Price level index (Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure)90.2Ranked 18th▲ 5· 2025
- Prison population rate90Ranked 24th▲ 9· 2023
- Probability of death at birth0.38%Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Probability of death at birth0.38%Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Probability of death at birth0.47%Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2023
- Projected population density of the capital city3,065.2Ranked 153rd▼ 1· 2100
- Projected population of the capital city772,421.3Ranked 129th—· 2100
- Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone92.4%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 4G mobile network (%)99.5%Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of urban population living in slums (%)1.1%Ranked 120th▲ 14· 2022
- Q00405.7Ranked 164th—· 2100
- Q0040Female3.4Ranked 180th▲ 2· 2100
- Q0040Male7.8Ranked 147th—· 2100
- Q006018.6Ranked 181st—· 2100
- Q0060Female12Ranked 184th—· 2100
- Q0060Male24.9Ranked 177th—· 2100
- Q15508.3Ranked 166th—· 2100
- Q1550Female4.9Ranked 180th—· 2100
- Q1550Male11.5Ranked 155th—· 2100
- Q156017.5Ranked 180th—· 2100
- Q1560Female11.1Ranked 182nd▲ 1· 2100
- Q1560Male23.6Ranked 173rd—· 2100
- Q50.99Ranked 178th—· 2100
- Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral0.61Ranked 30th▼ 6· 2025
- Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Upper Chamber1.1Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2025
- Refugees by country of asylum269,496Ranked 26th▼ 9· 2024
- Refugees by country of origin309Ranked 124th▼ 2· 2024
- Replacement fertility rate2.1Ranked 43rd▼ 15· 2010
- Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)0.1%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Rural81.6%Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Rural population5.76MRanked 69th▼ 1· 2050
- Rural population7.13MRanked 71st▲ 1· 2025
- Rural population growth (annual %)-0.08Ranked 119th▲ 98· 2025
- Rural population (% of total population)17.1Ranked 167th—· 2025
- Rural share0%Ranked 89th▼ 4· 2024
- Safely managed81.3%Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- Sex ratio at age 100 and over22Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2023
- Sex ratio at age 5105.1Ranked 86th▲ 9· 2023
- Sex ratio at age 6098Ranked 63rd▼ 2· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth105.3Ranked 87th▲ 1· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth105.3Ranked 87th▲ 1· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth (male births per female births)1.1Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2024
- Share in extreme poverty0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of births by mothers aged 10-191.4%Ranked 183rd—· 2023
- Share of deaths with a cause registered100%Ranked 11th· 2015
- Share of one person households27.6%Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2011
- Share of population below $1.90 a day (2011 prices)0.25%Ranked 50th▼ 9· 2019
- Share of population below $3.20 a day (2011 prices)0.5%Ranked 49th▼ 15· 2019
- Share of population below $5.50 a day (2011 prices)0.72%Ranked 58th▼ 13· 2019
- Share of population in poverty ($10 a day)0.8%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($1.90 a day)0.25%Ranked 20th▼ 8· 2019
- Share of population in poverty ($1 a day)0.1%Ranked 18th▼ 6· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($2.15 a day)0.25%Ranked 20th▼ 6· 2019
- Share of population in poverty ($30 a day)9.1%Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($30 a day)16.7%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2019
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($40 a day)18.9%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($4.20 a day)0.3%Ranked 13th▼ 5· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($8.30 a day)0.6%Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($8.30 a day)0.6%Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2022
- Share of population in poverty (40% of the median)6.1%Ranked 25th▼ 7· 2022
- Share of population in poverty (50% of the median)10.9%Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of population in poverty (60% of the median)17.4%Ranked 25th—· 2022
- Share of population living in cities52.1%Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2020
- Share of population living in cities52.1%Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2020
- Share of population living in extreme poverty0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of population living in rural areas23.8%Ranked 122nd▼ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas82.9%Ranked 40th—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas82.9%Ranked 40th—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas82.9%Ranked 40th—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas76.2%Ranked 94th▲ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas76.2%Ranked 94th▲ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas82.9%Ranked 40th—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas82.9%Ranked 40th—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas76.2%Ranked 94th▲ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas82.9%Ranked 40th—· 2025
- Share of population with suffrage100%Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Share of single-parent households8.9%Ranked 13th▼ 20· 2016
- Share of the population born in another country22.2%Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2024
- Share of the population living with HIV0.15%Ranked 109th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of the population not using improved sanitation facilities1.4%Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2024
- Share of the population practicing open defecation0%Ranked 104th▼ 3· 2024
- Share of the population using at least basic sanitation98.6%Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of the population using improved sanitation facilities98.6%Ranked 57th—· 2024
- Share of the population using safely managed sanitation81.3%Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- Share of the population using the Internet94%Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2023
- Share of the population who are Christians53.3%Ranked 111th▲ 11· 2020
- Share of the population who are not religious34.6%Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2020
- Share of the population who are religious65.4%Ranked 174th▲ 4· 2020
- Share of the population who cannot afford sufficient calories2.2%Ranked 91st· 2021
- Share of the rural population using at least basic sanitation98.8%Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of the urban population using at least basic sanitation98.6%Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of the urban population using safely managed sanitation81.2%Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Share of total population living in cities with 1 million or more people27.6%Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2020
- Share of total population living in the capital city1.5%Ranked 164th—· 2020
- Share of urban population living in the largest city18%Ranked 130th▲ 3· 2020
- Specialist surgical workforce (per 100,000 population)43.9Ranked 7th▼ 25· 2016
- SRB105.6Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2100
- Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort)92.5Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2024
- Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)87.8Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2024
- Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)87.8%Ranked 34th▼ 2· 2024
- Technicians in R&D (per million people)1,268.4Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2017
- TFR1.5Ranked 190th▲ 2· 2100
- Total deaths and disappearances recorded during migration (number)1Ranked 1st▼ 8· 2024
- Total density per million population, computed tomography units14.8Ranked 4th▼ 22· 2021
- Total density per million population, gamma camera or nuclear medicine15.6Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Total density per million population, magnetic resonance imaging10.3Ranked 5th▼ 21· 2021
- Total dependency ratio53%Ranked 125th▼ 3· 2023
- Total dependency ratio53%Ranked 125th▼ 3· 2023
- Total fertility rate1.3Ranked 178th▲ 5· 2024
- Total number of international immigrants8.81MRanked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- TPopulation1Jan53,524.6Ranked 45th—· 2100
- TPopulation1July53,612.2Ranked 45th—· 2100
- TPopulationFemale1July26,797.9Ranked 45th—· 2100
- TPopulationMale1July26,814.4Ranked 45th—· 2100
- Under5Deaths0.45Ranked 75th▼ 3· 2100
- Unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population (%) - Both sexes47%Ranked 28th▼ 7· 2022
- Urban population33.26MRanked 29th—· 2025
- Urban population34.52MRanked 29th—· 2025
- Urban population growth (annual %)1.2Ranked 116th▲ 76· 2025
- Urban population living in slums351,493Ranked 88th▲ 3· 2022
- Urban share98.6%Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2024
- Using improved sanitation facilities39.18MRanked 30th—· 2024
- Voter turnout of voting-age population61.3%Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2025
- Women's share of population ages 15+ living with HIV (%)26.3%Ranked 121st▼ 1· 2024
- Youth dependency ratio23.4%Ranked 175th▲ 1· 2023
- Median age of population40.3Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2023
- Total age dependency ratio53.1Ranked 124th▼ 3· 2023
- Net migration rate11Ranked 20th▼ 11· 2023
- Projected population in 2050 (medium)45,621.9Ranked 46th· 2050
- Projected life expectancy in 2050 (medium)86.2Ranked 22nd· 2050
Electricity access
- Electricity access100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Renewable energy share23.8%Ranked 86th▼ 7· 2021
- Forest area39.5%Ranked 78th—· 2023
- Electric power consumption14,093.5Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2024
- CO₂ per capita13.4Ranked 14th—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions533.34MRanked 11th—· 2024
- Renewable electricity63.9%Ranked 24th▼ 18· 2025
- Actions to tackle climate change86.9%Ranked 56th· 2024
- Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)150.34BRanked 115th▼ 4· 2021
- Adjusted net savings per capita, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)3,931.4Ranked 105th▼ 4· 2021
- Agriculture28.94MRanked 28th▼ 3· 2023
- Agriculture37.6MRanked 11th—· 2023
- Agriculture66.55MRanked 21st▼ 2· 2023
- Agriculture — All GHG66.6Ranked 149th▲ 4· 2023
- Agriculture — CH428.9Ranked 138th▲ 8· 2023
- Agriculture (farm gate) GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)128,104.3Ranked 191st▼ 1· 2023
- Agriculture — N2O37.6Ranked 144th▼ 5· 2023
- Agriculture sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Annual carbon dioxide emissions70.17MRanked 178th▼ 4· 2026
- Annual CO₂ emissions533.34MRanked 195th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions533.34MRanked 195th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions embedded in trade-25.54MRanked 10th▼ 5· 2023
- Annual CO₂ emissions embedded in trade (per capita)-0.65Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2023
- Annual CO₂ emissions from cement7.3MRanked 122nd—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from cement (per capita)0.18Ranked 102nd—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from coal28.67MRanked 105th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from coal (per capita)0.72Ranked 86th▼ 5· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation6.53MRanked 111th▲ 1· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring17.12MRanked 100th▲ 2· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring (per capita)0.43Ranked 93rd▲ 2· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from gas233.47MRanked 122nd—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from gas (per capita)5.9Ranked 116th▼ 2· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from international aviation12.31MRanked 162nd▼ 9· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change111.95MRanked 176th▼ 3· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change per capita2.8Ranked 169th▼ 3· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from oil244.57MRanked 198th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from oil (per capita)6.2Ranked 187th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions growth (abs)-12.14MRanked 5th▼ 26· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change645.29MRanked 182nd—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change per capita16.2Ranked 184th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions per GDP (kg per international-$)0.31Ranked 127th▼ 1· 2022
- Annual consumption-based CO₂ emissions519.94MRanked 109th—· 2023
- Annual consumption-based CO₂ emissions per GDP (kg per international-$)0.3Ranked 83rd▼ 2· 2022
- Annual greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry632.4MRanked 186th—· 2024
- Annual greenhouse gas emissions including land use802.73MRanked 187th▼ 1· 2024
- Annual greenhouse gas emissions including land use802.73MRanked 187th▼ 1· 2024
- Annual methane emissions including land use115.34MRanked 182nd▼ 2· 2024
- Annual nitrous oxide emissions including land use44.73MRanked 187th—· 2024
- Annual nitrous oxide emissions including land use44.73MRanked 187th—· 2024
- Annual PM2.5 emissions from wildfires570,135.5Ranked 180th▼ 2· 2026
- Annual precipitation669.9Ranked 133rd▼ 2· 2025
- Annual precipitation anomaly-2.4Ranked 75th▼ 20· 2025
- Aquaculture production (metric tons)160,518Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Average price on emissions covered by a carbon tax, weighted by the share of the country's CO₂ emissions8Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2025
- Average price on emissions covered by an ETS, weighted by the share of the country's CO₂ emissions2Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2025
- Average surface temperature-2.5Ranked 186th▲ 1· 2025
- Aviation and shipping361.1Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2023
- Believe climate change is a serious threat to humanity89.1%Ranked 20th· 2023
- Building — All GHG68.2Ranked 150th▲ 4· 2023
- Building — CH40.82Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2023
- Building — CO267.2Ranked 137th▲ 8· 2023
- Building — N2O0.12Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Buildings1,710.2Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2023
- Buildings67.21MRanked 9th—· 2023
- Buildings sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Bunker Fuels — All GHG14.2Ranked 109th▲ 1· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — CO214.1Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — N2O0.1Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons)681,733.1Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2024
- Carbon dioxide emissions from transport164.5MRanked 164th▼ 7· 2023
- Carbon intensity0.25Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2024
- Carbon monoxide emissions from all sectors2.88MRanked 183rd—· 2022
- Carbon price (US$ per tonne of CO₂ in 2025) on covered emissions (which can be economy-wide or sector-specific)26.5Ranked 17th▼ 27· 2025
- CH4 emissions4,216.3Ranked 189th—· 2023
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions0.04Ranked 197th—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and land use0.02Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry0.02Ranked 197th—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry0.02Ranked 197th—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by nitrous oxide emissions0Ranked 189th—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by nitrous oxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry0Ranked 189th—· 2024
- Change in heat-related death rate-194.4Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2090
- Child mortality rate0.54%Ranked 44th—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions533.34MRanked 195th—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita13.4Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita13.4Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita14Ranked 190th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita13.4Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita13.4Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita13.4Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita13.4Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita13.4Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita Consumption based, tonnes per capita13.2Ranked 171st—· 2022
- CO2 emissions per capita in 2018 (metric tonnes)15.5Ranked 148th· 2018
- CO2 emissions per capita in 2018 (metric tonnes)15.5Ranked 148th· 2018
- CO₂ emissions per unit energy137.2Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Coal0.72Ranked 46th▲ 5· 2024
- Consumption-based emissions13.2Ranked 104th▼ 2· 2023
- Consumption-based emissions per capita13.2Ranked 104th▼ 2· 2023
- Consumption-based fossil CO2 emissions141.9Ranked 101st—· 2023
- Consumption CO₂ emissions, million tonnes488Ranked 110th—· 2020
- Consumption CO₂ emissions, million tonnes506.6Ranked 182nd▼ 1· 2022
- Consumption CO₂ emissions, tonnes per capita12.9Ranked 107th—· 2020
- Consumption emissions per capita from Global Carbon Project13.8Ranked 156th—· 2022
- Covered by a carbon tax or an emissions trading system37.8%Ranked 10th—· 2025
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions35.64BRanked 197th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions35.64BRanked 197th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement397.63MRanked 129th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal9.84BRanked 122nd—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring666.77MRanked 113th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from gas8.99BRanked 125th▼ 1· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change40.4BRanked 182nd—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil15.65BRanked 198th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change76.04BRanked 184th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions, total34.9BRanked 186th—· 2022
- Death rate1,083Ranked 74th▼ 1· 2090
- Decadal average surface temperature-3.3Ranked 186th—· 2010
- Decadal temperature anomaly0.37Ranked 55th▼ 41· 2010
- December-2.6Ranked 187th▲ 181· 2025
- Electricity/Heat — All GHG205.3Ranked 152nd▼ 1· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — CH40.18Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — CO2204.8Ranked 152nd—· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — N2O0.3Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Energy — All GHG607.1Ranked 180th▲ 1· 2023
- Energy — CH477.2Ranked 136th▲ 3· 2023
- Energy — CO2525Ranked 174th▼ 2· 2023
- Energy — N2O4.8Ranked 78th▼ 2· 2023
- Firms adopting energy management measures to reduce emissions (% of firms)45.3Ranked 36th· 2024
- Firms monitoring own CO2 emissions (% of firms)22.6Ranked 42nd· 2024
- Fluorinated Gases sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Forestry And Land Use sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Fossil CO2 emissions575,012Ranked 195th▲ 1· 2023
- Fossil Fuel Operations sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Fossil fuels and industry533.34MRanked 11th—· 2024
- Fugitive emissions1,899Ranked 123rd▼ 1· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — All GHG77Ranked 101st▼ 3· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — CH474.6Ranked 101st▲ 1· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — CO22.2Ranked 39th▲ 6· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — N2O0.26Ranked 9th—· 2023
- GDP1.7%Ranked 140th▲ 2· 2025
- GDP per capita56,706.8Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP per capita45,529.6Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Government action on climate82.5%Ranked 74th· 2024
- Greenhouse gas emissions from food383.41MRanked 194th—· 2015
- Gross domestic product (GDP)2.34TRanked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- Heat-related death rate-194.4Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2090
- Industrial Processes — All GHG23.8Ranked 142nd▲ 6· 2023
- Industrial Processes — CH40.31Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Industrial Processes — CO27.3Ranked 100th▲ 2· 2023
- Industrial Processes — F-Gas15.4Ranked 124th▲ 5· 2023
- Industrial Processes — N2O0.7Ranked 35th—· 2023
- January2.1Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2026
- June1.7Ranked 30th▼ 90· 2026
- Land-use change and forestry7.47MRanked 6th▼ 14· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — All GHG155.7Ranked 151st▼ 1· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — CH47.5Ranked 39th▲ 15· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — CO2141.8Ranked 150th—· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — N2O6.5Ranked 37th▲ 15· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — All GHG67.7Ranked 134th▼ 6· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — CH40.24Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — CO267.2Ranked 139th▼ 2· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — N2O0.31Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Manufacturing sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- March-4.6Ranked 187th▲ 41· 2026
- Mineral Extraction sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- N2O emissions126.6Ranked 191st—· 2023
- National Carbon Footprint per capita17.3Ranked 14th—· 2020
- Nitrogen oxides emissions from all sectors1.41MRanked 193rd—· 2022
- Oil244.57MRanked 8th—· 2024
- Oil6.2Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Other fuel combustion19.31MRanked 7th—· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — All GHG19.3Ranked 102nd▲ 4· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — CH40.07Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — CO219.2Ranked 98th▲ 4· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — N2O0.04Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Per capita carbon dioxide emissions from transport4,185.8Ranked 185th—· 2023
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation164.3Ranked 114th▲ 2· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation164.3Ranked 113th▲ 1· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation164.3Ranked 114th▲ 2· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from international aviation309.9Ranked 135th▼ 6· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from international flights, international tourism-adjusted514.9Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from international flights, international tourism-adjusted514.9Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2024
- Per capita consumption-based CO₂ emissions13.2Ranked 104th▼ 2· 2023
- Per capita consumption-based CO₂ emissions13.2Ranked 104th▼ 2· 2023
- Per capita emissions13.2Ranked 104th▼ 2· 2023
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry15.9Ranked 183rd▼ 2· 2024
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry15.9Ranked 182nd▼ 2· 2024
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions including land use20.2Ranked 185th—· 2024
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions including land use20.2Ranked 186th—· 2024
- Per capita methane emissions including land use2.9Ranked 174th—· 2024
- Per capita nitrous oxide emissions including land use1.1Ranked 179th▼ 2· 2024
- Per capita total annual CO₂ emissions from aviation474.2Ranked 96th▼ 1· 2024
- Population0.94%Ranked 104th▲ 91· 2025
- Power sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Predicted share willing to give34.2%Ranked 76th· 2024
- See climate change as a serious threat (% of population)62.2Ranked 31st▼ 9· 2021
- See climate change as a somewhat serious threat (% of population)23.8Ranked 58th▲ 8· 2021
- See climate change as a threat (% of population)85.9Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2021
- Self-reported life satisfaction6.7Ranked 23rd▲ 5· 2025
- September2.5Ranked 3rd▼ 6· 2025
- Share of annual CO₂ emissions embedded in trade-4.7%Ranked 18th▼ 6· 2023
- Share of contribution to global warming2.3%Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Share of emissions1.4%Ranked 109th—· 2023
- Share of global annual CO₂ consumption-based emissions1.4%Ranked 109th—· 2023
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions1.4%Ranked 195th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from cement0.5%Ranked 122nd—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from coal0.18%Ranked 105th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from flaring4.1%Ranked 100th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from gas2.9%Ranked 122nd—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change2.4%Ranked 176th▼ 3· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from oil2%Ranked 198th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change1.5%Ranked 182nd—· 2024
- Share of global consumption-based emissions1.4%Ranked 109th—· 2023
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions1.9%Ranked 197th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement0.8%Ranked 129th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal1.2%Ranked 122nd—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring3.3%Ranked 113th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from gas3.2%Ranked 125th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change4.5%Ranked 182nd—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil2.5%Ranked 198th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change2.8%Ranked 184th—· 2024
- Share of global emissions1.4%Ranked 195th—· 2024
- Share of global greenhouse gas emissions1.5%Ranked 187th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of global methane emissions1.2%Ranked 182nd▼ 1· 2024
- Share of global nitrous oxide emissions1.5%Ranked 187th—· 2024
- Share of population0.53%Ranked 45th—· 2100
- Share of the global emissions from food2.1%Ranked 194th—· 2015
- Share of total greenhouse gas emissions that come from food41.1%Ranked 97th▲ 4· 2015
- Sulfur dioxide emissions from all sectors629,054.9Ranked 184th▼ 2· 2022
- Sulfur dioxide emissions from all sectors629,054.9Ranked 184th▼ 2· 2022
- Support political action on climate72%Ranked 26th· 2023
- Temperature anomaly1.2Ranked 28th▲ 16· 2025
- Temperature anomaly1.2Ranked 28th▲ 16· 2025
- Terrestrial and marine protected areas (% of total territorial area)11.6Ranked 94th▲ 7· 2025
- Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)12.9Ranked 109th▲ 2· 2025
- Territorial CO₂ emissions, million tonnes542.66MRanked 182nd—· 2021
- Territorial CO₂ emissions, million tonnes per capita14.2Ranked 179th▼ 1· 2021
- Territorial emissions533.34MRanked 195th—· 2024
- Territorial fossil CO2 emissions145.6Ranked 172nd—· 2024
- Time to obtain an electrical connection (days)37Ranked 22nd· 2024
- Total annual CO₂ emissions from aviation18.85MRanked 108th▲ 1· 2024
- Total CH4 emissions4.57MRanked 201st—· 2024
- Total CH4 emissions4,423.4Ranked 193rd▲ 2· 2023
- Total CO2 emissions737,591.9Ranked 198th▼ 1· 2023
- Total CO2 emissions740.76MRanked 209th—· 2024
- Total density per million population, positron emission tomography1.5Ranked 11th▼ 17· 2021
- Total excluding LULUCF — All GHG721Ranked 182nd▲ 2· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — CH4128.8Ranked 160th▼ 2· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — CO2532.3Ranked 175th▲ 1· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — F-Gas15.4Ranked 124th▲ 5· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — N2O44.5Ranked 153rd▲ 4· 2023
- Total fisheries production (metric tons)842,251.1Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Total (fossil fuels and land-use change)645.29MRanked 11th—· 2024
- Total GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Total GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)931,547.9Ranked 202nd—· 2023
- Total GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)747,678Ranked 195th▲ 1· 2023
- Total greenhouse gas emissions with LULUCF (Mt CO₂ equivalent)759.2Ranked 82nd▼ 6· 2022
- Total greenhouse gas emissions without LULUCF (Mt CO₂ equivalent)707.8Ranked 80th▼ 6· 2022
- Total including LULUCF — All GHG876.7Ranked 182nd▲ 2· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — CH4136.2Ranked 161st▼ 2· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — CO2674.1Ranked 183rd▲ 2· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — F-Gas15.4Ranked 124th▲ 5· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — N2O50.9Ranked 156th▲ 6· 2023
- Total N2O emissions203Ranked 200th▲ 3· 2023
- Total N2O emissions168,434.7Ranked 207th—· 2024
- Transportation — All GHG169.6Ranked 172nd—· 2023
- Transportation — CH41.3Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2023
- Transportation — CO2164.5Ranked 165th▼ 7· 2023
- Transportation — N2O3.8Ranked 65th▼ 2· 2023
- Transportation sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Value lost due to electrical outages (% of sales for affected firms)0Ranked 6th· 2024
- Waste — All GHG23.6Ranked 142nd▲ 3· 2023
- Waste — CH422.3Ranked 132nd▼ 3· 2023
- Waste — N2O1.4Ranked 57th▲ 1· 2023
- Waste sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)936.37MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Year-on-year change in CO₂ emissions (%)-2.2%Ranked 26th▼ 68· 2024
- Electricity from coal4%Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity from solar1.6%Ranked 72nd▼ 48· 2025
- Electricity from wind7.9%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity from hydro52.8%Ranked 13th▼ 23· 2025
- Power-sector CO2 intensity190.7Ranked 31st▼ 16· 2025
- Total GHG emissions incl. LULUCF876.7Ranked 182nd▲ 2· 2023
- GHG emissions per capita21.9Ranked 180th—· 2023
Risk
Deaths in armed conflicts
- Deaths in armed conflicts0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- INFORM risk score2.8Ranked 17th· 2026
- Hazard & exposure2.8Ranked 23rd· 2026
- Vulnerability3.2Ranked 21st· 2026
- Lack of coping capacity2.4Ranked 16th· 2026
- Natural hazard & exposure4.6Ranked 33rd· 2026
- Human hazard & exposure0.6Ranked 7th· 2026
- Socio-economic vulnerability0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- Abortion related0Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Access to electricity0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Access to electricity100Ranked 73rd· 2026
- AFF_DR_REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Agriculture Drought Probability4.2Ranked 6th· 2026
- Agriculture Stress Index Probability4.2Ranked 6th· 2026
- Agriculture Stress Index Probability0.13Ranked 6th· 2026
- Airports and airplanes0Ranked 2nd—· 2021
- Annual number of deaths from droughts0Ranked 1st—· 1988
- Annual number of people affected by droughts0Ranked 14th▼ 2· 1988
- Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force)0.35%Ranked 139th▲ 2· 2020
- Armed forces personnel, total72,000Ranked 57th—· 2020
- Asylum seekers per 100,000734.9Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2024
- A terrorist attack: Worried28.9%Ranked 62nd· 2022
- A terrorist attack: Worried28.9%Ranked 62nd· 2022
- Attacks12Ranked 31st▼ 8· 2021
- Attacks12Ranked 31st▼ 8· 2021
- Attacks12Ranked 31st▼ 8· 2021
- Average dietary supply adequacy145Ranked 52nd· 2026
- Average dietary supply adequacy0.7Ranked 5th· 2026
- Best estimate0Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2025
- Best estimate0Ranked 23rd▼ 5· 2025
- Best estimate0Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2025
- Best estimate0Ranked 31st▼ 6· 2025
- bioweapons_status_current_num0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM2.3Ranked 23rd· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.DTP31.2Ranked 8th· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.MCV23.4Ranked 20th· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.PCV32.4Ranked 15th· 2026
- CC.INF.PHY.STA0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- chemweapons_status_current_num0Ranked 5th· 2022
- Child Mortality5.1Ranked 25th· 2026
- Child Mortality0.4Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Civilian deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Civilian deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Coastal Flood14,326.2Ranked 105th· 2026
- Coastal floods (absolute)5.4Ranked 38th· 2026
- Communication2Ranked 18th· 2026
- Conflict GPI1Ranked 9th· 2026
- Conflict GPI1.3Ranked 19th· 2026
- Corruption Perception Index75Ranked 58th· 2026
- Corruption Perception Index2.5Ranked 10th· 2026
- Country where conflict took place - Conflict type: all0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Cumulative death rate in armed conflicts0.19Ranked 11th· 2024
- Cumulative deaths in armed conflicts51Ranked 16th· 2024
- Current health expenditure per capita7,645.9Ranked 179th· 2026
- Cyclones2.3Ranked 12th· 2026
- Death rate from natural disasters among both sexes0.01Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2021
- Death rate in ongoing conflicts (best estimate) - Conflict type: all0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Deaths from other terrorist attacks4Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2021
- Deaths in armed conflicts0Ranked 1st—· 2026
- Deaths in armed conflicts based on where they occurred0Ranked 1st—· 2026
- Demographic pressures (S1)1.2Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Development & Deprivation0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Disaster risk reduction progress score (1-5 scale; 5=best)4.3Ranked 12th· 2011
- Drought affected0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Drought affected0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Drought Frequency0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Drought Frequency0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Droughts2.1Ranked 15th· 2026
- DRR2.9Ranked 16th· 2026
- earthquake (absolute)6.8Ranked 49th· 2026
- earthquake (relative)1.8Ranked 13th· 2026
- Earthquakes4.8Ranked 28th· 2026
- Economic inequality (E2)2.5Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Economy (E1)1.4Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Estimated number of people living with HIV - Adult (>15) rate0.2Ranked 1st· 2026
- Estimated number of people living with HIV - Adult (>15) rate0.1Ranked 1st· 2026
- EX_CFL_REL0.04Ranked 76th· 2026
- EX_EQ_MMI6_REL0.06Ranked 40th· 2026
- EX_EQ_MMI8_REL0Ranked 13th· 2026
- EX_FL_REL0.63Ranked 109th· 2026
- EX_TC_SS1_REL0.11Ranked 25th· 2026
- EX_TC_SS3_REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- External intervention (X1)0.4Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- EX_TS_REL1,644.4Ranked 52nd· 2026
- Factionalized elites (C2)2.5Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Fatalities4Ranked 35th▼ 8· 2021
- Fatalties4Ranked 35th▼ 8· 2021
- FSI total score18.9Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- FTS-1.REL0Ranked 9th· 2026
- FTS-2.REL-0.01Ranked 4th· 2026
- FTS-3.REL0.01Ranked 10th· 2026
- FTS Instability0.03Ranked 15th· 2026
- FTS Instability0Ranked 1st· 2026
- GDP per capita (current US$)54,340.3Ranked 173rd· 2026
- Gender Inequality Index0.05Ranked 16th· 2026
- Gender Inequality Index0.7Ranked 8th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 38.78MRanked 154th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 39.11MRanked 154th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 39.43MRanked 154th· 2026
- Governance2.3Ranked 10th· 2026
- Government Effectiveness1.5Ranked 174th· 2026
- Government Effectiveness2Ranked 10th· 2026
- Group grievance (C3)2Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2023
- HA.FWB1.1Ranked 3rd· 2026
- HA.FWB.FOOD0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP3Ranked 10th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.HOUS1.1Ranked 5th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.POP.DNST2.2Ranked 6th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.URB.GROW6.3Ranked 57th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.URB.TOTL8.3Ranked 62nd· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH.STA.BASS0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH.STA.ODFC0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.HUM.CON.GCRI0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.NAT.CFL-ABS6.6Ranked 49th· 2026
- HA.NAT.CFL-REL4Ranked 33rd· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR.AFF0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR.AFF-FREQ0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI6-ABS7.6Ranked 45th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI6-REL3.1Ranked 18th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI8-ABS5.7Ranked 14th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI8-REL0.2Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.NAT.FL-REL6.7Ranked 46th· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS1-REL0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS3-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS-ABS4.1Ranked 17th· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS-REL0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.NAT-TEMP4.6Ranked 33rd· 2026
- HA.NAT.TS-REL5.2Ranked 35th· 2026
- HA.P2P3.1Ranked 11th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP4.5Ranked 15th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.HOUS1.1Ranked 5th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.POP.DNST2.2Ranked 6th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.URB.GROW6.3Ranked 57th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.URB.TOTL8.3Ranked 62nd· 2026
- HA.P2P.WASH0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- HA.P2P.WASH.STA.BASS0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- HA.VECT.AEDES0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.AEDES-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.DENG0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.DENG-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.MAL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.MAL-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV-ABS0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Hazard3.2Ranked 14th· 2026
- HA.ZOON6.8Ranked 50th· 2026
- HA.ZOON.LA6.8Ranked 49th· 2026
- HDI-Est0.94Ranked 173rd· 2026
- Health Care1.4Ranked 13th· 2026
- Health expenditure per capita0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Highly Violent Internal Conflict probability0.01Ranked 28th· 2026
- Household size2.5Ranked 5th· 2026
- Household size2.5Ranked 5th· 2026
- Human0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Human Development Index0.94Ranked 148th· 2026
- Human Development Index0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Human flight and brain drain (E3)0.7Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Human rights (P3)1.9Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- IHR capacity score: Food safety, SPAC100Ranked 5th· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- Incidence of Tuberculosis 6.2Ranked 26th· 2026
- Income Gini coefficient - Inequality in income or consumption31.1Ranked 29th· 2026
- Income Gini coefficient - Inequality in income or consumption1.5Ranked 15th· 2026
- Inequality1.1Ranked 9th· 2026
- Internally Displaced People0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Internally displaced people due to conflict0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases)192,000Ranked 103rd▲ 28· 2023
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service146,951Ranked 19th· 2026
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service348,092Ranked 19th· 2026
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service-215,738Ranked 4th· 2026
- Internationalized intrastate0Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Internet users (per 100 people)94Ranked 160th· 2026
- Internet users (per 100 people)0.6Ranked 7th· 2026
- Interstate conflicts0Ranked 1st· 2024
- Intrastate0Ranked 102nd· 2024
- IS.ROD.DNST.K213.2Ranked 61st· 2026
- Land area (sq. km)9.09MRanked 186th· 2026
- LA_REL4.9Ranked 132nd· 2026
- Maternal Mortality12Ranked 12th· 2026
- Maternal Mortality0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Military expenditure32.61BRanked 13th—· 2023
- Military expenditure37.53BRanked 16th—· 2025
- Military expenditure (% of government spending)3.7%Ranked 113th▼ 8· 2025
- Military expenditure per armed forces personnel374,714.8Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Military expenditure per military personnel279,421.5Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2016
- Military personnel66,000Ranked 53rd—· 2016
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)5.4Ranked 43rd· 2026
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)94.1Ranked 55th· 2026
- More than 100 deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Natural Disasters3.5Ranked 23rd· 2026
- Natural Disasters0.4Ranked 8th· 2026
- Natural Disasters31.5Ranked 53rd· 2026
- New HIV infections (per 1000 uninfected population)0.1Ranked 5th· 2026
- Non-fatal injuries3Ranked 35th▼ 10· 2021
- Non-state conflict deaths1Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2001
- Nuclear weapons status0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Number of live animals192.48MRanked 154th· 2026
- Number of people requiring interventions against neglected tropical diseases3Ranked 4th· 2026
- Number of reported natural disasters - Earthquakes1Ranked 6th—· 2017
- Number of reported natural disasters - Tsunamis1Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2024
- Number of reported natural disasters with a small impact1Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2025
- Number of reported natural disasters with a small impact5Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2020
- ODA-1.REL0Ranked 3rd· 2026
- ODA-2.REL0Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Official Development Assistance0Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Official Development Assistance0Ranked 3rd· 2026
- One-sided violence0Ranked 8th—· 2025
- One-sided violence0Ranked 31st▼ 6· 2025
- One-sided violence0Ranked 31st▼ 6· 2025
- One-sided violence0Ranked 34th▼ 9· 2025
- One-sided violence0Ranked 34th▼ 9· 2025
- Others Vulnerable Groups0.2Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Other terrorist attacks12Ranked 31st▼ 8· 2021
- People practicing open defecation (% of population)0Ranked 1st· 2026
- People using at least basic drinking water services (% of population)98.3Ranked 119th· 2026
- People using at least basic sanitation services (% of population)98.6Ranked 142nd· 2026
- Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)0.04Ranked 9th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VI7.6Ranked 45th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VI24,505.4Ranked 96th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VIII1,205.9Ranked 21st· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VIII5.7Ranked 14th· 2026
- Physical exposure to flood247,277.7Ranked 123rd· 2026
- Physical exposure to river flood7.4Ranked 55th· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 16.7Ranked 28th· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 144,467.2Ranked 47th· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 30Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 30Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tsunamis64.8Ranked 71st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tsunamis6.2Ranked 38th· 2026
- Physical Infrastructure3.1Ranked 29th· 2026
- Physicians density3Ranked 25th· 2026
- Physicians density28.2Ranked 119th· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.AEDES-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.DENGUE-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.MAL.ZS0Ranked 1st· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.ZIKA-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population ages 0-5 (% of total)4.7Ranked 33rd· 2026
- Population ages 0-5 (% of total)0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population at Risk to Aedes0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population at Risk to Aedes0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)4.6Ranked 9th· 2026
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)4.6Ranked 9th· 2026
- Population exposed to Dengue0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population exposed to Dengue0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population exposed to Zika0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population living in urban areas (%)82.7Ranked 158th· 2026
- Population living in urban areas (%)82.7Ranked 158th· 2026
- Population living in urban slums1.1Ranked 30th· 2026
- Population living in urban slums0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Populations at risk of malaria0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Populations at risk of malaria0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)2.4Ranked 1st· 2026
- Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)100%Ranked 22nd▼ 10· 2023
- Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)100%Ranked 22nd▼ 10· 2023
- Proportion of the target population with access to 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3)92Ranked 38th· 2026
- Proportion of the target population with access to measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2)79Ranked 45th· 2026
- Proportion of the target population with access to pneumococcal conjugate 3rd dose (PCV3)85Ranked 35th· 2026
- Public services (P2)1.7Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2023
- Refugee change from previous year, by country of asylum66,769Ranked 21st▼ 65· 2022
- Refugee change from previous year, by country of origin131Ranked 103rd▼ 43· 2022
- Refugees and asylum-seekers by country of asylum701,307Ranked 146th· 2026
- Refugees and IDPs (S2)2Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Refugees by country of origin per 100,000 people0.78Ranked 168th▲ 7· 2024
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of asylum416,028Ranked 21st▼ 5· 2025
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of origin360Ranked 123rd▼ 2· 2025
- Remittences Instability0Ranked 9th· 2026
- Remittences Instability0.6Ranked 5th· 2026
- Returned refugees0Ranked 1st· 2026
- River floods7.1Ranked 50th· 2026
- Road density (km of road per 100 sq. km of land area)8.8Ranked 50th· 2026
- Roads, total network (km)1.2MRanked 126th· 2026
- Score of adoption and implementation of national DRR strategies in line with the Sendai Framework1Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2023
- Score of adoption and implementation of national DRR strategies in line with the Sendai Framework1Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2023
- Security apparatus (C1)2.2Ranked 14th—· 2023
- SFM Indicator E-1 Frequency of Reporting = count0.2Ranked 2nd· 2026
- SFM Indicator E-1 Frequency of Reporting = count8.9Ranked 8th· 2026
- SFM Indicator E-1 Score = non zero average0.98Ranked 83rd· 2026
- SFM Indicator E-1 Score = non zero average0.3Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Share of deaths from terrorism0%Ranked 20th▲ 8· 2021
- Sovereign state1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- State involved in conflict - Conflict type: state-based0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- State involved in conflict - Hostlev: all1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2014
- State involved in war - Conflict type: all0Ranked 1st—· 2011
- State legitimacy (P1)0.4Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Terrorism deaths per 100,000 people0.01Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2021
- Total deaths from natural disasters among both sexes5.1Ranked 22nd▲ 17· 2021
- Total number of deaths caused by a disaster and secondary effects - Earthquakes1Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2012
- Total number of deaths caused by a disaster and secondary effects - Tsunamis1Ranked 1st—· 2012
- Tsunamis5.7Ranked 35th· 2026
- Tuberculosis prevalence0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Unknown0Ranked 14th▼ 5· 2021
- Unknown0Ranked 14th▼ 5· 2021
- Unknown0Ranked 15th▼ 8· 2021
- Unknown0Ranked 15th▼ 8· 2021
- Uprooted people8Ranked 60th· 2026
- Urban population growth (annual %)3.2Ranked 152nd· 2026
- Urban population growth (annual %)3.2Ranked 152nd· 2026
- Vulnerability0.28Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Vulnerability: adaptive capacity0.29Ranked 20th—· 2024
- Vulnerability: ecosystem services0.46Ranked 91st▲ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: exposure0.4Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Vulnerability: food0.24Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: health0.23Ranked 25th—· 2024
- Vulnerability: human habitat0.5Ranked 87th—· 2024
- Vulnerability: infrastructure0.11Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: sensitivity0.16Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Vulnerability: water0.15Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Vulnerable groups5.3Ranked 48th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Development0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP0.01Ranked 7th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP.GEO0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP.NORM0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Humanitarian0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP0Ranked 2nd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP.GEO0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP.NORM0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-TOT0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.REM0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.REM.GEO0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Remittences0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.PD.HDI0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.PD.HDI-EST0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.FS0.4Ranked 4th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.HIV0.3Ranked 3rd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.HIV.INCD0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.TRP0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.TRP-REL0Ranked 6th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-POP0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-TOT10,018.5Ranked 42nd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.U50.4Ranked 3rd· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-ABS9.5Ranked 56th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-POP1.8Ranked 110th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-REL6.5Ranked 45th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-TOT701,307Ranked 131st· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.REF-TOT701,307Ranked 144th· 2026
- War took place0Ranked 2nd—· 2010
- Lack of institutional coping capacity2.6Ranked 10th· 2026
- Lack of infrastructure coping capacity2.2Ranked 19th· 2026
- Organized-violence deaths (total)1Ranked 2nd▼ 10· 2001
Society
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2050Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2050UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2050
Gini index
- Gini index31.5Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2022
- Extreme poverty0.3%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Internet users94.4%Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2024
- Homicide rate2Ranked 42nd▼ 10· 2023
- Female labor participation60.2%Ranked 49th▲ 1· 2025
- Fixed broadband subscriptions42.5Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Life satisfaction6.7Ranked 23rd▲ 5· 2025
- Human Development Index0.94Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Gender Inequality Index0.05Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.99Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted HDI0.87Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2023
- Planetary pressures-adjusted HDI0.64Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2023
- Accepting a bribe: Never justifiable60.2%Ranked 74th▲ 47· 2022
- Adolescent birth rate4.8Ranked 170th▲ 1· 2023
- All ages0.8Ranked 40th▲ 6· 2022
- Altruism (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.23Ranked 14th· 2012
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, bottom 40% of population (%)1.9Ranked 4th· 2022
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, total population (%)0.66Ranked 5th· 2022
- Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter)8.8Ranked 155th▼ 42· 2023
- Asylum-seekers (by country of asylum)314,475Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2025
- Asylum-seekers by country of origin215Ranked 142nd▼ 1· 2025
- Asylum-seekers by country of origin351Ranked 143rd▲ 3· 2024
- Asylum-seekers by country of residence292,055Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2024
- Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum314,469Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2025
- Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin215Ranked 142nd▼ 1· 2025
- Augmented Human Development Index (AHDI)0.83Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- Augmented Human Development Index (AHDI)0.83Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- Average remittance costs of sending $200 for a sending country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%)5.3Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2025
- Average transaction cost of sending remittances from a specific country (%)3Ranked 28th▲ 5· 2023
- A woman can choose where to live in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- A woman can open a bank account in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- A woman can sign a contract in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Basic welfare Index (IDEA)81.7Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2021
- Below $3 a day0.3%Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2022
- Cereal yield (kg per hectare)3,694.7Ranked 72nd▲ 11· 2023
- Children (13-15) who reported being bullied32%Ranked 68th· 2015
- co2_prod14.2Ranked 11th—· 2023
- coef_ineq7.5Ranked 150th—· 2023
- Completeness of homelessness data11Ranked 1st· 2022
- Countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Current number of seats in national parliaments (number)343Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2026
- Daily male smokers2.33MRanked 41st—· 2012
- Daily time spent on domestic work, women (UN (2017))7.3Ranked 4th—· 2010
- Death rate from interpersonal violence among both sexes1.6Ranked 40th▼ 4· 2021
- Deaths from homicide in both sexes in all ages306Ranked 43rd▼ 3· 2022
- Detected victims of human trafficking, by age and sex (number) - under 18 years old - Female79Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2017
- diff_hdi_phdi31.5Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)2,320.8Ranked 9th· 2023
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters relative to GDP (%)0Ranked 31st· 2023
- Direct economic loss in the housing sector attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)57.98MRanked 24th· 2023
- Direct economic loss to other damaged or destroyed productive assets attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)2.26BRanked 2nd· 2023
- Equal access to financial services for women and men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Equality of civil liberties across social groups-0.33Ranked 133rd▼ 1· 2025
- Equality of political power across social groups1.2Ranked 63rd▲ 1· 2025
- eys_f16.5Ranked 50th—· 2023
- eys_m15.3Ranked 50th—· 2023
- Females0.08Ranked 174th▲ 11· 2023
- Female share of low pay earners54.6%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2025
- Female to male ratio of time devoted to unpaid care work (OECD (2014))1.6Ranked 58th· 2014
- Forcibly displaced people730,497Ranked 133rd▲ 1· 2025
- gdi_group1Ranked 5th· 2023
- GDI Group1Ranked 5th· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.99Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.99Ranked 33rd▲ 7· 2023
- Gender-equal inheritance for women (How Was Life (2014))0Ranked 2nd· 1920
- Gender Inequality Index0.05Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- gii_rank18Ranked 138th· 2023
- Gini according to the World Inequality Database0.36Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2022
- Gini coefficient0.31Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2022
- Gini coefficient of lifespan inequality - Sex: female0.08Ranked 43rd▼ 11· 2023
- Gini coefficient of lifespan inequality - Sex: male0.1Ranked 47th▼ 12· 2023
- Gini Index around 201534Ranked 26th· 2015
- gni_pc_f45,016.1Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- gni_pc_m64,493.6Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2023
- Growth rates of household expenditure or income per capita (%)0.66Ranked 4th· 2022
- Happiness: Happy84.9%Ranked 56th▲ 50· 2022
- Harmonized national poverty line39.9Ranked 13th· 2020
- Harmonized national poverty line39.9Ranked 13th· 2020
- HCI in males0.79Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2020
- hdi_f0.93Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- hdi_m0.94Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- hdi_rank16Ranked 148th· 2023
- Homicides778Ranked 56th▼ 14· 2023
- Homicides of female victims205Ranked 40th▼ 13· 2023
- Homicides of female victims205Ranked 40th▼ 13· 2023
- Homicides of male victims564Ranked 52nd▼ 12· 2023
- Homicides where the weapon was a firearm289Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2023
- Homosexual couples are as good parents as other couples: Agree/Strongly agree72.3%Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Homosexuality: Not justifiable11.4%Ranked 82nd▲ 18· 2022
- Hours per day spent on unpaid domestic labor, by sex, age and location (hrs per day) - 15 years old and over - All areas - Female4Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2023
- Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1)0.8Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, female (scale -30–87)55Ranked 18th▲ 5· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, male (scale -30–87)59.3Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, total (scale -30–87)57.2Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, female (scale 0–325)256.6Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, male (scale 0–325)253.2Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, total (scale 0–325)256.9Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2025
- Human Development Index0.94Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Human Development Index0.94Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Human Development Index0.94Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Human Development Index0.94Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Human Development Index (male)0.94Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- [ILO] Proportion of poor population receiving social assistance cash benefit, by sex (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2021
- [ILO] Proportion of population covered by at least one social protection benefit, by sex (%)95.6Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2022
- [ILO] Proportion of population with severe disabilities receiving disability cash benefit, by sex (%)69.4Ranked 6th▼ 8· 2022
- [ILO] Proportion of vulnerable population receiving social assistance cash benefit, by sex (%)100Ranked 60th▲ 51· 2021
- Income share held by fourth 20%22.6Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Income share held by highest 10%24.6Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2022
- Income share held by highest 20%39.5Ranked 42nd▼ 5· 2022
- Income share held by lowest 10%2.9Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2022
- Income share held by lowest 20%7.7Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2022
- Income share held by second 20%13Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2022
- Income share held by third 20%17.2Ranked 10th—· 2022
- ineq_edu2.2Ranked 175th—· 2023
- ineq_inc16Ranked 142nd—· 2023
- ineq_le4.3Ranked 155th—· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted HDI0.87Ranked 135th▲ 4· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index0.87Ranked 135th▲ 4· 2023
- Intentional homicides, female (per 100,000 female)1Ranked 44th▼ 3· 2023
- Intentional homicides, male (per 100,000 male)2.9Ranked 42nd▼ 13· 2023
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases)192,000Ranked 104th▲ 29· 2023
- Justice system (courts)58.1%Ranked 37th▲ 19· 2022
- Justifiable, terrorism: average score1.8Ranked 28th· 2022
- Labour share of GDP (%)59.7Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2025
- Latest data (2021 prices)0.3%Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2022
- Latest data (2021 prices)116,808Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2022
- Laws on child marriage0.75Ranked 2nd· 2019
- le_f84.8Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2023
- Legal equality index95.7Ranked 4th· 2026
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 1: overarching legal frameworks and public life80%Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 1: overarching legal frameworks and public life80Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 2: violence against women88.9%Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 2: violence against women88.9Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 3: employment and economic benefits90Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 4: marriage and family81.8Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 4: marriage and family81.8%Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- le_m80.4Ranked 23rd▼ 8· 2023
- lfpr_f61.6Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2023
- lfpr_m69.7Ranked 97th▼ 5· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 19th▼ 6· 2023
- Liquid assets to short term liabilities (%)53.2Ranked 46th▼ 13· 2024
- loss7.7Ranked 150th▲ 1· 2023
- Married women are not required by law to obey their husbands1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Maternal mortality ratio11Ranked 45th—· 2023
- Mean daily welfare74.4Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2026
- Median daily welfare63.7Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2026
- mf40.3Ranked 6th—· 2023
- mys_f13.9Ranked 4th—· 2023
- mys_m13.8Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Negative reciprocity (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.02Ranked 35th· 2012
- Neighborhood81.8%Ranked 21st▲ 7· 2022
- Neighbors being homosexuals: Mentioned10.2%Ranked 75th▲ 10· 2022
- Neighbors of a different religion: Mentioned5.9%Ranked 48th▼ 2· 2022
- Net personal wealth share, bottom 50%0.14Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Net personal wealth share, top 1%0.29Ranked 62nd▼ 1· 2024
- Net personal wealth share, top 10%0.6Ranked 122nd▲ 2· 2024
- New book titles published per million people662.8Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 1996
- Non-performing loans net of provisions to capital (%)5Ranked 74th▼ 22· 2024
- Non-performing loans to total gross loans (%)0.57Ranked 124th▼ 8· 2024
- Not in extreme poverty38.82MRanked 52nd▼ 10· 2022
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters (number)57Ranked 20th▲ 6· 2024
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)0.14Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Number of deaths due to disaster (number)57Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2024
- Number of directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)106.2Ranked 32nd▲ 7· 2024
- Number of injured or ill people attributed to disasters (number)458Ranked 38th▼ 24· 2023
- Number of local governments (number)14Ranked 2nd▼ 38· 2025
- Number of local governments that adopt and implement local DRR strategies in line with national strategies (number)14Ranked 2nd▼ 30· 2025
- Number of people affected by disaster (number)42,200Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2024
- Number of people below $1.90 a day (2011 prices)93,491Ranked 26th▼ 14· 2019
- Number of people whose destroyed dwellings were attributed to disasters (number)1,837Ranked 22nd· 2023
- Number of people whose livelihoods were disrupted or destroyed, attributed to disasters (number)42,200Ranked 16th▲ 8· 2024
- Number of refugees per 100,000 population, by country of origin (per 100,000 population)0.86Ranked 165th▼ 4· 2025
- Number of surveys in the past decade7Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2025
- Official development assistance grants for poverty reduction, by donor countries (percentage of GNI)0.02Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2024
- Overall loss7.7%Ranked 150th▲ 1· 2023
- Patience (time preference) (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.72Ranked 4th· 2012
- Percentage point change in share of people who are religious (2010-2020)-10.8%Ranked 187th· 2020
- Police Officers per 1,000 people2.9Ranked 48th▼ 8· 2015
- pop_total39.3Ranked 38th—· 2023
- Positive reciprocity (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.2Ranked 18th· 2012
- Post-tax national income share, bottom 50%0.26Ranked 24th—· 2024
- Post-tax national income share, top 1%0.09Ranked 142nd▼ 2· 2024
- Post-tax national income share, top 10%0.29Ranked 157th▲ 7· 2024
- Poverty gap at $2.15/day0Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (%)0.2Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2022
- Poverty gap at $3.65/day0Ranked 50th▼ 3· 2026
- Poverty gap at $4.20 a day (2021 PPP) (%)0.2Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- Poverty gap at $6.85/day0Ranked 38th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (%)0.3Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Poverty gap index ($3 a day)0.15%Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2022
- Poverty headcount ratio at $2.15/day0Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $3.65/day0Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $4.20 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)0.3Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Poverty headcount ratio at $6.85/day0Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)0.6Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2022
- Poverty headcount ratio at societal poverty line (% of population)12.2Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2022
- Poverty severity at $2.15/day0Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty severity at $3.65/day0Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty severity at $6.85/day0Ranked 50th—· 2026
- Pre-tax national income share, bottom 50%0.17Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Pre-tax national income share, top 1%0.12Ranked 119th▲ 1· 2024
- Pre-tax national income share, top 10%0.37Ranked 124th—· 2024
- pr_f35.8Ranked 39th—· 2023
- Prison capacity percent102.2%Ranked 22nd· 2023
- pr_m64.2Ranked 143rd▼ 4· 2023
- Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls subjected to physical and/or sexual violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by age (%) - 15 to 49 years old2.6%Ranked 115th· 2018
- Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls subjected to physical and/or sexual violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by age (%) - 15 years old and over1.7%Ranked 105th· 2018
- Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone, by sex (%)95.7Ranked 28th—· 2024
- Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)100Ranked 2nd▼ 26· 2025
- Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income (%)10.9Ranked 41st▼ 5· 2022
- Proportion of people with secure tenure rights to land out of total adult population, by sex (%)75.6Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2019
- Proportion of population below international poverty line (%)0.3Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of population reporting having felt discriminated against, by grounds of discrimination, sex and disability (%)15.7Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2020
- Proportion of population using basic drinking water services, by location (%)98.3Ranked 51st▼ 1· 2024
- Proportion of population using basic sanitation services, by location (%)98.6Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services (%)63.8Ranked 10th▼ 9· 2024
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, education (%)11.4Ranked 26th▼ 29· 2024
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, education [UIS methodology] (%)10.7Ranked 111th▼ 26· 2022
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, health (%)21.9Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2024
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, social protection (%)30.5Ranked 17th▼ 12· 2024
- Prosperity gap0.65Ranked 62nd▼ 11· 2022
- Prosperity gap (average shortfall from a prosperity standard of $28/day)0.7Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2022
- rankdiff_hdi_phdi-79Ranked 64th· 2023
- Regulatory capital to assets (%)4.7Ranked 117th▼ 10· 2024
- Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%)14.9Ranked 35th▼ 10· 2024
- Return on assets (%)0.81Ranked 118th▼ 8· 2024
- Risk taking (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.18Ranked 60th· 2012
- (S.1.C.1) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 1: Maternity Care (%)0Ranked 5th· 2022
- (S.1.C.3) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 3: Abortion100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.1.C.4) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 4: Post-Abortion Care (%)0Ranked 5th· 2022
- (S.2.C.5) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 5: Contraceptive Services (%)0Ranked 6th· 2022
- (S.2.C.6) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 6: Contraceptive Consent (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.2.C.7) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 7: Emergency Contraception (%)0Ranked 5th· 2022
- (S.2) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 2: Contraceptive and Family Planning (%)33Ranked 15th· 2022
- (S.3.C.8) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 8: Sexuality Education Curriculum Laws (%)0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.3.C.9) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 9: Sexuality Education Curriculum Topics (%)0Ranked 6th· 2022
- (S.3) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 3: Sexuality Education (%)0Ranked 7th· 2022
- (S.4.C.10) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 10: HIV Counselling and Test Services80Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4.C.11) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 11: HIV Treatment and Care Services (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.4.C.12) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 12: HIV Confidentiality (%)80Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4.C.13) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 13: HPV Vaccine (%)0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 4: HIV and HPV (%)65Ranked 8th· 2022
- Score of adoption and implementation of national DRR strategies in line with the Sendai Framework1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- se_f96.1Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- Self-reported life satisfaction6.7Ranked 23rd▲ 5· 2025
- Self-reported life satisfaction (up to 29 years)6.4Ranked 55th· 2023
- Self-reported life satisfaction (up to 29 years)6.4Ranked 55th· 2023
- se_m96.5Ranked 29th—· 2023
- Share according to the World Inequality Database9.1%Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2022
- Share agreeing "most people can be trusted"46.7%Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Share in extreme monetary poverty0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share in extreme poverty0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share in extreme poverty0.3%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of firms with a female top manager21.9%Ranked 17th· 2024
- Share of people who attend religious services frequently16.4%Ranked 68th▲ 28· 2022
- Share of people who pray frequently35.5%Ranked 46th· 2022
- Share of prisoners that are pre-trial detainees46.6%Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2023
- Share of total deaths from homicide in both sexes in all ages0.09%Ranked 24th▼ 15· 2022
- Share of women aged 15-19 years old who are married or in a union1.3%Ranked 75th▼ 27· 2021
- Share of women aged 15-49 years old who are married or in a union53.6%Ranked 127th▼ 3· 2050
- Share (top 10%, wealth)59.8%Ranked 122nd▲ 2· 2024
- Share (top 1%, wealth)28.6%Ranked 62nd▼ 1· 2024
- Share who say religion is "very important"15.5%Ranked 65th▲ 28· 2022
- Stateless persons10,288Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2025
- Survey mean consumption or income per capita, bottom 40% of population (2021 PPP $ per day)39.2Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Survey mean consumption or income per capita, total population (2021 PPP $ per day)75.7Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2022
- There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Total assistance for development, by donor countries (millions of current United States dollars)10,131.3Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2025
- Total deaths and disappearances recorded during migration (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Total deaths from interpersonal violence among both sexes626.2Ranked 116th▼ 2· 2021
- Total expenditure per capita spent on cultural and natural heritage, public (PPP, constant 2017 United States dollars)212.3Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2024
- Total shortfall ($3 a day)64.09MRanked 36th—· 2022
- Trust: Confidence in the churches39.6%Ranked 72nd▲ 29· 2022
- Trust: Confidence in the United Nations57.2%Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2022
- Trust in others46.7%Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Trust journalists in this country71.5%Ranked 16th· 2020
- Trust people in neighborhood84.2%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Trust people of another religion79.2%Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2022
- Trust science89.3%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Trust the national government in this country72.6%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Universities71.8%Ranked 31st· 2022
- Very important30.7%Ranked 90th▲ 28· 2022
- Very important15.5%Ranked 65th▲ 28· 2022
- Very important12.2%Ranked 43rd▲ 10· 2022
- Very important48.7%Ranked 41st▲ 33· 2022
- Very important72.6%Ranked 17th· 2022
- Very important51.2%Ranked 13th▼ 15· 2022
- Very important79.3%Ranked 85th▲ 60· 2022
- Watts index at $2.15/day0Ranked 131st—· 2026
- Watts index at $3.65/day0Ranked 156th—· 2026
- Watts index at $6.85/day0Ranked 175th▼ 1· 2026
- WBL: Enforcement Perceptions Index (scale 0-100)73.4Ranked 24th· 2025
- WBL: Legal Framework Index (scale 0-100)87.9Ranked 20th· 2025
- WBL: Supportive Framework Index (scale 0-100)92.9Ranked 1st· 2025
- WEO Index overall score (Economist Intelligence Unit (2012))83.2Ranked 9th· 2012
- Woman chief executive (31st December)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Woman head of government (31st December)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Woman head of state (31st December)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Women4Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2023
- Women, Business and the Law Index100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women can apply for a passport in the same way as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women can get a divorce on the same terms as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women can get a job in the same way as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women can register a business on the same terms as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Years a country was an European overseas colony312Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Youth NEET rate13.1%Ranked 58th—· 2027
- Poverty headcount at $2.15/day0Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2026
- Poverty headcount at $3.65/day0Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2026
- Poverty headcount at $6.85/day0Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $2.15/day0Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2026
- Refugees hosted (by country of asylum)416,028Ranked 21st▼ 5· 2025
- Refugees originating (by country of origin)360Ranked 54th▲ 2· 2025
- Asylum seekers215Ranked 40th▼ 7· 2025
2.5.1 - Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution - ER_GRF_ANIMRCNTN_TRB
- 2.5.1 - Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution - ER_GRF_ANIMRCNTN_TRB9Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2025
- 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures - Value ()0.71Ranked 20th▼ 12· 2023
- Affordability of a healthy diet: ratio of cost to food expenditures50%Ranked 70th· 2021
- Affordability of a nutrient adequate diet: ratio of cost to food expenditures34%Ranked 61st· 2021
- Agricultural export subsidies (millions of current United States dollars)2.7Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Agricultural irrigated land (% of total agricultural land)1.6%Ranked 33rd▼ 10· 2015
- Agricultural irrigated land (% of total agricultural land)1.6Ranked 34th▼ 10· 2015
- Agricultural land56,796Ranked 15th—· 2024
- Agricultural land (% of land area)6.5Ranked 190th—· 2023
- Agricultural land (% of land area)6.5%Ranked 190th—· 2023
- Agricultural land (sq. km)568,750Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Agricultural land use56.88MRanked 15th—· 2023
- Agricultural land use56.88MRanked 15th—· 2023
- Agricultural land use per capita1.4Ranked 30th—· 2023
- Agriculture1.1%Ranked 170th—· 2025
- Agriculture0.71%Ranked 162nd—· 2025
- Agriculture37.6MRanked 11th—· 2023
- Agriculture956.8Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Agriculture956.8Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Agriculture area under organic agric. - Area (hectares)1.29MRanked 11th—· 2023
- Agriculture as a share of GDP1.9%Ranked 147th▼ 9· 2022
- agriculture_ha59.86MRanked 15th—· 2010
- Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures0.66Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2024
- Agriculture share of Government Expenditure (%)1.2Ranked 76th▼ 13· 2024
- Agriculture value added share of GDP (%)1.8Ranked 106th▼ 29· 2024
- All fertilizers use4.72MRanked 7th—· 2023
- all_sizes_number280,043Ranked 3rd· 1991
- Animal protein70.7Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Animal protein282.8Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Antibiotic use in livestock60.2Ranked 80th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (mg per population corrected units)60.2Ranked 84th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (mg per population corrected units)60.2Ranked 84th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (tonnes)1,004.4Ranked 17th· 2020
- Apple production386,368Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Aquaculture160,518Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Aquaculture production160,518Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Aquaculture production (metric tons)160,518Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Arable land38,064Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Arable land (hectares)38.15MRanked 7th—· 2023
- Arable land (hectares per person)0.95Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Arable land (hectares per person)0.95Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Arable land needed to produce a fixed quantity of crops0.18Ranked 123rd▼ 1· 2023
- Arable land (% of land area)4.3Ranked 142nd—· 2023
- Arable land (% of land area)4.3%Ranked 142nd—· 2023
- Area of permanent meadows and pastures18.56MRanked 37th—· 2023
- Average dietary energy supply adequacy143%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2025
- Average farm size273.4Ranked 4th—· 2000
- Average income of large-scale food producers, PPP (constant 2017 international $)74,071.1Ranked 1st—· 2016
- Average income of small-scale food producers, PPP (constant 2017 international $)-2,388Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2016
- Average precipitation in depth (mm per year)537Ranked 134th—· 2022
- Barley production8.14MRanked 5th▼ 1· 2024
- Barley yield3.4Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2024
- Bean production424,141Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Bean yields2.7Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Beef and buffalo meat production1.29MRanked 12th▲ 1· 2024
- Business-as-usual51,033.8Ranked 25th· 2050
- Cages (battery or enriched)87%Ranked 12th· 2018
- Calories from animal protein282.8Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Cattle meat yield per animal378Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Cephalopods - Production (tonnes)11,000Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2023
- Cereal production63.66MRanked 9th▼ 1· 2024
- Cereal production (metric tons)59.24MRanked 11th▲ 3· 2023
- Cereals325.2Ranked 124th▼ 7· 2017
- Cereals allocated to human food18.8%Ranked 163rd▼ 9· 2023
- Cereals - excluding beer used for direct human food5.32MRanked 39th▼ 10· 2023
- Cereals, primary production63.66MRanked 9th▼ 1· 2024
- Cereal yield (kg per hectare)3,694.7Ranked 72nd▲ 11· 2023
- Cereal yields4Ranked 64th▼ 6· 2024
- Cereal yields4Ranked 64th▼ 6· 2024
- Cereal yields4Ranked 64th▼ 6· 2024
- Change in agriculture area with respect to one decade back-1.7%Ranked 120th▼ 1· 2023
- Change to land area used for cereal production since 196182Ranked 89th▲ 6· 2014
- Chicken meat production1.42MRanked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Chicken meat yield per animal1.8Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2024
- Coefficient of Variation (CV) of caloric intake0.2Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2020
- Corn attainable yield9.7Ranked 23rd· 2012
- Corn yield gap0Ranked 90th▼ 1· 2024
- Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Country area1.56MRanked 2nd—· 2024
- Cropland38,236Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Cropland1.4Ranked 3rd—· 2010
- Cropland area38.32MRanked 9th—· 2023
- Cropland area38.32MRanked 9th—· 2023
- Cropland area38.32MRanked 9th—· 2023
- Crop production index (2014-2016 = 100)108Ranked 83rd▼ 97· 2022
- Daily food supply141.09BRanked 32nd▼ 1· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of all meat259.7Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of calories from miscellaneous group23.2Ranked 56th▼ 8· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of calories from vegetal products2,600.7Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of cereals - excluding beer371.2Ranked 111th▼ 12· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from animal products70.7Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from fish and seafood5Ranked 80th▼ 2· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from vegetal products42.2Ranked 110th▲ 31· 2023
- Dairy (milk equivalents)443.5Ranked 45th▲ 3· 2017
- Dietary energy supply (kcal/capita/day)3,590Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Egg production658,814.4Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2024
- Egg production per bird17.8Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2024
- Estimated number of farmed fish33MRanked 48th▲ 6· 2022
- Excess nitrogen per hectare of cropland25.6Ranked 100th· 2009
- Excess phosphorous per hectare of cropland1.5Ranked 123rd· 2009
- Fat supply (g/capita/day)163.1Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2023
- Female employment in agriculture0.71%Ranked 162nd—· 2025
- Fertilizer consumption (FAO (2017) & Federico (2008))89.4Ranked 85th▲ 2· 2014
- Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)132.8Ranked 64th▼ 10· 2023
- Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)132.8Ranked 64th▼ 10· 2023
- Fertilizer consumption (% of fertilizer production)37.4Ranked 54th▼ 5· 2023
- Fertilizer use per hectare of cropland123.1Ranked 46th▼ 9· 2023
- Fish and seafood consumption per capita (kg)21.9Ranked 64th▲ 2· 2018
- Fish and seafood - Production (tonnes)933,000Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Food as share of total consumer expenditure9.7%Ranked 98th▼ 1· 2023
- Food expenditure9.7%Ranked 98th▼ 1· 2023
- Food expenditure2,775.2Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2023
- Food exports (% of merchandise exports)13.5%Ranked 72nd▼ 19· 2024
- Food - Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) (thousand US Dollar)49.09BRanked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)111.6Ranked 77th▼ 81· 2022
- Forest area (sq. km)3.47MRanked 3rd—· 2023
- Forest land368,818.9Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Fruit, primary production976,880.5Ranked 90th—· 2024
- Grape production79,478Ranked 53rd▲ 2· 2024
- Gross production value of the agricultural sector58.29BRanked 11th—· 2024
- HALF Index (habitable land area)129.8%Ranked 8th· 2011
- HALF Index (habitable land area) (Alexander et al. (2016))129.8%Ranked 8th· 2011
- Hypothetical global meat demand if everyone ate like the average citizen of a given country766.98MRanked 26th—· 2023
- Hypothetical number of land animals that would be slaughtered if all countries produced meat in the same way as a given country176.01BRanked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Imports of cereals - excluding beer8.35MRanked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- In cages23.36MRanked 15th· 2018
- Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Consumer Food Price Index-0.31Ranked 72nd▲ 9· 2024
- Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Consumer Food Price Index0.89Ranked 62nd▲ 7· 2023
- Insecticide use4,245Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2023
- Intensity of agricultural-environmental policies8.8Ranked 41st· 2022
- Land area878,870Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Land area (sq. km)8.79MRanked 4th—· 2023
- Land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.65Ranked 143rd—· 2015
- Land (crop, pasture)8,030.1Ranked 25th▼ 6· 2014
- Land under cereal production (hectares)16.03MRanked 9th—· 2023
- Land use: Agriculture56.19MRanked 16th—· 2025
- Land use: Cropland38.07MRanked 9th—· 2025
- Land used for cereal production15.83MRanked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Land used for rye production117,000Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2024
- Land use: Grazingland18.12MRanked 38th▲ 2· 2025
- Land use (per capita): Agriculture1.4Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2025
- Land use (per capita): Cropland0.96Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Lettuce yields22.5Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2024
- Life expectancy at birth82.6Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2023
- Livestock production index (2014-2016 = 100)119.1Ranked 57th▲ 7· 2022
- Machinery per unit of agricultural land0.86Ranked 49th—· 2019
- Maize production15.34MRanked 8th▼ 1· 2024
- Maize yield10.6Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2024
- Male employment in agriculture1.5%Ranked 168th—· 2025
- Meat, total production5.19MRanked 14th▲ 2· 2024
- Milk production9.96MRanked 19th—· 2024
- Milk production per animal10,345Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Milk, total production9.96MRanked 19th—· 2024
- Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply45%Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2023
- nitrogen_applied_per_ha55.5Ranked 91st· 2009
- Nitrogen fertilizer use3.12MRanked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Nitrogen fertilizer use3.12MRanked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Nitrogen use efficiency59.5%Ranked 68th▲ 25· 2014
- Number of cattle10.99MRanked 31st▲ 1· 2024
- Number of cattle slaughtered for meat3.41MRanked 16th—· 2024
- Number of cattle slaughtered for meat9,349Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Number of chickens slaughtered to produce meat806.79MRanked 21st▲ 1· 2024
- Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution0Ranked 20th—· 2025
- Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution0Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2025
- Number of local breeds kept in the country26Ranked 52nd▲ 4· 2025
- Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number)21Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2025
- Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number)0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Number of moderately or severely food insecure people4MRanked 52nd—· 2023
- Number of people employed in agriculture226,258Ranked 110th▲ 1· 2025
- Number of people who cannot afford sufficient calories899,999Ranked 56th· 2021
- Number of pigs13.99MRanked 9th—· 2024
- Number of policies22Ranked 54th· 2022
- Number of poultry birds180.64MRanked 31st▲ 2· 2024
- Number of severely food insecure people700,000Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2023
- Number of severely food insecure people (3-year avg)0.7Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution9Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)185Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) (number)151Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number)13Ranked 14th▲ 9· 2025
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)73.2Ranked 44th▼ 14· 2023
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)73.2Ranked 44th▼ 14· 2023
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)73.2Ranked 44th▼ 14· 2023
- Nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)29.4Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2023
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)20.5Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2023
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) - Use per capita (Kilograms per capita)21Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Other60.5Ranked 89th▲ 3· 2023
- Pea production3MRanked 2nd—· 2024
- Pea yields2.3Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2024
- Permanent cropland (% of land area)0.02Ranked 189th—· 2023
- Phosphorous inputs per hectare of cropland10.6Ranked 99th· 2009
- Pig meat production2.28MRanked 8th—· 2024
- Pig meat yield per animal106Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2024
- Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)124,356Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)124,356Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Population in moderate or severe food insecurity (thousands of people)4,003.8Ranked 56th▼ 6· 2023
- Population in severe food insecurity (thousands of people)734.7Ranked 58th▼ 11· 2023
- Potash fertilizer production13.55MRanked 1st—· 2023
- Potatoes yield41.7Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Potato production6.51MRanked 13th▲ 1· 2024
- Poultry meat production1.59MRanked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Poultry meat yield per animal1.9Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Prevalence of anaemia among women of reproductive age14%Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (3-year avg)10.5%Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2025
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)10.2Ranked 88th▼ 18· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)10.2Ranked 88th▼ 18· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the total population10.2%Ranked 88th▼ 18· 2023
- Prevalence of obesity in the adult population26%Ranked 89th▼ 4· 2024
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%)1.9Ranked 78th▼ 9· 2023
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%)1.9Ranked 78th▼ 9· 2023
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the total population1.9%Ranked 78th▼ 9· 2023
- Prevalence of stunting in children under 511.4%Ranked 73rd▼ 7· 2024
- Productivity of large-scale food producers (agricultural output per labour day, PPP) (constant 2017 international $)1,688.4Ranked 1st—· 2016
- Productivity of small-scale food producers (agricultural output per labour day, PPP) (constant 2017 international $)83.5Ranked 10th▲ 9· 2016
- Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture4.7Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of agricultural land area that has achieved an acceptable or desirable level of farm output value per hectare (%)71Ranked 5th· 2021
- Proportion of agricultural land area that has achieved an acceptable or desirable level of risk mitigation mechanisms (%)100Ranked 8th· 2021
- Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)71Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2025
- Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)71%Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2025
- Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)41Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2025
- Protein supply (g/capita/day)112.9Ranked 35th▲ 11· 2023
- [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture, current status score3.8Ranked 11th—· 2024
- [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture, trend score4.3Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2024
- Rapeseed production19.24MRanked 1st—· 2024
- Rapeseed yields2.2Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2024
- Retail29.8Ranked 13th▼ 111· 2022
- Rodenticide use14Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2023
- Roots and tubers, total production6.51MRanked 30th—· 2024
- Rural land area (sq. km)9.2MRanked 2nd—· 2015
- Rural land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.64Ranked 139th—· 2015
- Rural land area where elevation is below 5 meters (sq. km)59,244.9Ranked 5th—· 2015
- Rye production420,925Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Rye yield3.6Ranked 17th▼ 9· 2024
- Share of arable land that is organic2.3%Ranked 52nd▲ 9· 2023
- Share of cereals allocated to human food18.8%Ranked 163rd▼ 9· 2023
- Share of cereals that are allocated to animal feed59.3%Ranked 42nd▲ 9· 2023
- Share of egg-laying hens in cage-free systems13%Ranked 32nd· 2018
- Share of employment in agriculture1.1%Ranked 170th—· 2025
- Share of employment in agriculture1.1%Ranked 170th—· 2025
- Share of expenditure spent on food9.7%Ranked 98th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of farms that are smallholders2.5Ranked 5th· 1991
- Share of habitable land needed for agriculture129.8%Ranked 8th· 2011
- Share of landowners which are female (%) (FAO (2017))27.4%Ranked 20th· 2011
- Share of land used for permanent meadows and pastures2.1%Ranked 167th▼ 3· 2023
- Share of people employed in agricultural sector1.3%Ranked 169th▼ 2· 2023
- Share of people employed in agricultural sector1.3%Ranked 169th▼ 2· 2023
- Share of people who are undernourished2.5%Ranked 83rd—· 2023
- Share of people who are undernourished2.5%Ranked 83rd—· 2023
- Share of the daily calorie supply that comes from animal protein7.9%Ranked 44th—· 2023
- Share of the population defined as severely food insecure1.9%Ranked 78th▼ 9· 2023
- Soybean production7.57MRanked 7th—· 2024
- Soybean production7.57MRanked 7th—· 2024
- Soybeans used for direct human food34,000Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2023
- Soybean yields3.3Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2024
- Staples (cereals and roots)0.39Ranked 51st· 2021
- Sugar beet production1.44MRanked 23rd▼ 3· 2024
- Sugar beet yield79Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2024
- Sunflower seed production50,680Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2024
- Sunflower seed yields2.1Ranked 24th▲ 4· 2024
- Surface area (sq. km)15.63MRanked 2nd—· 2023
- Taylor and Rising (2021)47.17MRanked 7th▲ 1· 2010
- Taylor and Rising (2021)59.86MRanked 15th—· 2010
- Taylor and Rising (2021)12.69MRanked 42nd—· 2010
- Tobacco production27,780.2Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2024
- Tomato production548,107Ranked 42nd▼ 1· 2024
- Tomato yields89.1Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2024
- total_applied_nitrogen1.96MRanked 9th· 2009
- total_applied_phosphorous379,008.4Ranked 10th· 2009
- Total daily supply of fat per person163.1Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2023
- Total daily supply of protein per person112.9Ranked 35th▲ 11· 2023
- Total food expenditure2,775.2Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2023
- Total meat production5.19MRanked 14th▲ 2· 2024
- Total meat production5.19MRanked 14th▲ 2· 2024
- Total pesticide use95,645Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Total pesticide use per area of cropland2.5Ranked 80th▼ 3· 2023
- Urban land area (sq. km)13,983.1Ranked 26th—· 2015
- Urban land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0Ranked 163rd—· 2015
- Urban land area where elevation is below 5 meters (sq. km)290.6Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2015
- Value added per worker150,631.6Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Vegetables, primary production2.39MRanked 48th—· 2024
- Wheat3.4Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2024
- Wheat3.4Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2024
- Wheat production35.94MRanked 5th▼ 1· 2024
- Wheat yield3.4Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2024
- Wheat yields3.4Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2024
- Wheat yields3.4Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2024
- Wild fish used as fishmeal and oil (animal feed)1,318.6Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2015
- Wine production62,731.9Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of all meat94.8Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of cocoa beans2.3Ranked 35th▲ 7· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of dates0.4Ranked 36th▼ 9· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of eggs15.9Ranked 20th—· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fish and seafood20.8Ranked 67th▼ 2· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fish and seafood20.8Ranked 67th▼ 2· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fruit112.2Ranked 47th▲ 5· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fruit307.5Ranked 47th▲ 5· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of milk - excluding butter185.9Ranked 46th▼ 4· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of other meat0.57Ranked 78th▼ 12· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of poultry meat41.6Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of poultry meat41.6Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetables313.7Ranked 78th▲ 10· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetables114.5Ranked 78th▲ 10· 2023
12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%) - ER_FFS_CMPT_GDP
- 12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%) - ER_FFS_CMPT_GDP0.19%Ranked 52nd▼ 15· 2021
- 12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars) - ER_FFS_CMPT_PC_CD83.6Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2021
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking (% of population)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Access to clean fuels for cooking100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Access to electricity, rural (% of rural population)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Affordability of an energy sufficient diet: ratio of cost to food expenditures11%Ranked 48th· 2021
- Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use)19.2Ranked 14th▼ 11· 2024
- Annual change in coal consumption-21.8Ranked 71st▲ 24· 2024
- Annual change in fossil fuel consumption37.4Ranked 14th▼ 11· 2024
- Annual change in gas consumption44.1Ranked 7th▼ 18· 2024
- Annual change in hydropower consumption-42.8Ranked 71st▲ 1· 2024
- Annual change in low-carbon energy consumption-32.7Ranked 79th—· 2024
- Annual change in low-carbon energy consumption-32.7Ranked 79th—· 2024
- Annual change in nuclear power consumption-7.2Ranked 31st▲ 19· 2024
- Annual change in oil consumption15.1Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2024
- Annual change in primary energy consumption-1.7Ranked 173rd▼ 27· 2024
- Annual change in primary energy consumption-0.04%Ranked 159th▲ 7· 2024
- Annual change in renewables consumption-25.5Ranked 79th—· 2024
- Annual change in solar and wind power consumption17.9Ranked 8th▼ 9· 2024
- Annual change in solar power consumption2.5Ranked 30th▲ 16· 2024
- Annual change in solar power consumption2.5Ranked 30th▲ 16· 2024
- Annual change in wind power consumption15.4Ranked 5th▼ 17· 2024
- Annual deaths attributed air pollution from fossil fuels17,574Ranked 145th· 2015
- Annual patents filed in sustainable energy5Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2024
- Annual percentage change in coal consumption-21.2%Ranked 66th▲ 35· 2024
- Annual percentage change in fossil fuel consumption1.5%Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2024
- Annual percentage change in gas consumption3.6%Ranked 35th▲ 3· 2024
- Annual percentage change in hydropower consumption-4.9%Ranked 52nd▼ 5· 2024
- Annual percentage change in low-carbon energy consumption-2.6%Ranked 68th▼ 4· 2024
- Annual percentage change in oil consumption1.3%Ranked 45th▲ 6· 2024
- Annual percentage change in renewables consumption-2.4%Ranked 65th▼ 9· 2024
- Annual percentage change in solar and wind power consumption15%Ranked 35th▼ 20· 2024
- Annual percentage change in solar power consumption12.1%Ranked 50th▲ 27· 2024
- Annual percentage change in solar power consumption12.1%Ranked 50th▲ 27· 2024
- Annual percentage change in wind power consumption15.6%Ranked 14th▼ 36· 2024
- Battery electric (BEV)65.5%Ranked 31st▲ 7· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Clean (GW)123.1Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (GW)32.9Ranked 19th▼ 6· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (GW)29.5Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (GW)86.8Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (GW)110.5Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (GW)23.7Ranked 17th—· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Bioenergy (GW)2.7Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Coal (GW)3.4Ranked 28th▼ 3· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Gas (GW)27.2Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Hydro (GW)84.1Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Nuclear (GW)12.7Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Other Fossil (GW)2.3Ranked 23rd▼ 6· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Solar (GW)5.9Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Wind (GW)17.7Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Coal consumption81.1Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Coal consumption81.1Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Coal consumption81.1Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Coal consumption per capita2,041.7Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2024
- Coal consumption per capita2,041.7Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2024
- Coal consumption per capita2,041.7Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2024
- Coal production317.6Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Coal production per capita7,991.5Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2024
- Coal production per capita7,991.5Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2024
- Combustible renewables and waste (% of total energy)4.7Ranked 35th▼ 69· 2024
- Cost of an energy sufficient diet0.79Ranked 63rd· 2021
- Death rate from protein-energy malnutrition among both sexes0.65Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2021
- Electric cars168,000Ranked 17th▲ 11· 2025
- Electric cars sold168,000Ranked 17th▲ 11· 2025
- Electricity demand645.6Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity demand — Demand — Demand (TWh)645.6Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity demand — Demand per capita — Demand per capita (MWh)16.1Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Clean (%)77%Ranked 25th▼ 9· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Clean (TWh)502.2Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (%)23%Ranked 65th▼ 83· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (TWh)150.3Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (%)19%Ranked 49th▼ 77· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (TWh)124.2Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (%)54.4%Ranked 19th▼ 23· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (TWh)355.2Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (%)63.9%Ranked 24th▼ 17· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (TWh)416.8Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (%)9.5%Ranked 55th▼ 24· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (TWh)61.7Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal26.7Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal26.7Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal per person664.9Ranked 24th▼ 12· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal per person664.9Ranked 27th▼ 9· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels150.2Ranked 14th▼ 7· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels150.2Ranked 14th▼ 7· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels150.2Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person3,743.4Ranked 18th▼ 21· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person3,743.4Ranked 14th▼ 25· 2025
- Electricity generation from gas115.9Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation from gas per person2,888.3Ranked 12th▼ 12· 2025
- Electricity generation from hydropower344.7Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Electricity generation from hydropower343.2Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Electricity generation from hydropower per person8,591.3Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation from low-carbon sources502.2Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person12,516.1Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation from nuclear85.3Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from nuclear power per person2,126.3Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation from oil7.6Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2025
- Electricity generation from oil per person190.1Ranked 23rd▼ 46· 2025
- Electricity generation from other renewables, excluding bioenergy0Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation from other renewables, including bioenergy10.5Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation from renewables416.9Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from renewables per person10,389.8Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power61.7Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power61.7Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power per person1,536.4Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar power9.4Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power9,416.5Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power9.4Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power10.2Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar power per person253.4Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2025
- Electricity generation from wind power51.5Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Electricity generation from wind power46.8Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Electricity generation from wind power46,829.8Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Electricity generation from wind power51.5Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Electricity generation from wind power per person1,282.9Ranked 13th▼ 5· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Bioenergy (%)1.6%Ranked 39th▼ 18· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Bioenergy (TWh)10.5Ranked 10th▼ 5· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Coal (%)4%Ranked 43rd▼ 18· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Coal (TWh)26.1Ranked 21st—· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Gas (%)17.9%Ranked 44th▼ 33· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Gas (TWh)116.6Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Hydro (%)52.8%Ranked 13th▼ 23· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Hydro (TWh)344.7Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Nuclear (%)13.1%Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Nuclear (TWh)85.3Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Fossil (%)1.2%Ranked 50th▼ 75· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Fossil (TWh)7.6Ranked 16th▼ 7· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Solar (%)1.6%Ranked 72nd▼ 48· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Solar (TWh)10.2Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Wind (%)7.9%Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Wind (TWh)51.5Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Electricity generation — Total — Total Generation (TWh)652.4Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Electricity imports — Electricity imports — Net Imports (TWh)-6.8Ranked 65th▼ 45· 2025
- Electricity production from coal sources (% of total)2.9Ranked 21st▼ 44· 2024
- Electricity production from hydroelectric sources (% of total)55.4Ranked 8th▼ 21· 2024
- Electricity production from natural gas sources (% of total)16.4Ranked 20th▼ 57· 2024
- Electricity production from nuclear sources (% of total)13.9Ranked 14th▼ 7· 2024
- Electricity production from oil, gas and coal sources (% of total)19.7Ranked 53rd▼ 70· 2023
- Electricity production from oil sources (% of total)0.8Ranked 21st▼ 69· 2024
- Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (kWh)51.29BRanked 13th▲ 2· 2021
- Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (% of total)7.9Ranked 85th▲ 5· 2021
- Electric power transmission and distribution losses (% of output)4.2Ranked 33rd▼ 105· 2024
- Energy imports, net (% of energy use)-89.6Ranked 61st▼ 55· 2023
- Energy imports, net (% of energy use)-89.6%Ranked 61st▼ 55· 2023
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (megajoules per constant 2021 purchasing power parity GDP)5.4Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2023
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)6.4Ranked 19th▼ 18· 2022
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)6.4Ranked 19th▼ 18· 2022
- Energy use (kg of oil equivalent) per $1,000 GDP (constant 2021 PPP)124.5Ranked 2nd▼ 23· 2024
- Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita)7,160.7Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2024
- Energy use per capita83,278.6Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2024
- Final energy5.3Ranked 35th▲ 3· 2012
- Fossil fuel consumption per capita64,809.7Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Fossil fuel consumption per capita64.8Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Fossil fuel consumption per capita64,809.7Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Fossil fuels19.7%Ranked 53rd▼ 70· 2023
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)3.41BRanked 40th▼ 5· 2023
- Gas consumption1,285.4Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Gas consumption1,285.4Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Gas consumption1,285.4Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Gas consumption per capita32,342.1Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2024
- Gas consumption per capita32,342.1Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2024
- Gas production1,941.6Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Gas production1,941.6Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Gas production per capita48,854.3Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Gas production per capita48,854.3Ranked 10th—· 2024
- GDP per unit of energy use (constant 2021 PPP $ per kg of oil equivalent)8Ranked 40th▼ 77· 2024
- GDP per unit of energy use (PPP $ per kg of oil equivalent)9.1Ranked 40th▼ 76· 2024
- Hydropower consumption per capita21,062.3Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Industrial uses (often fuel)6.24MRanked 6th▲ 2· 2023
- Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity (watts per capita)2,755.4Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity (watts per capita) - All renewables2,766.4Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Lifecycle carbon intensity of electricity generation190.7Ranked 60th▼ 83· 2025
- Low-carbon energy consumption per capita31.4Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Low-carbon energy consumption per capita31,362.2Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Minimum dietary energy requirement1,928Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2024
- Net electricity imports-6.8Ranked 64th▼ 45· 2025
- Net electricity imports as a share of demand-1.1%Ranked 53rd▼ 41· 2025
- Nuclear power consumption per capita5,245.2Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Number of patents in batteries113Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Number of people with access to clean fuels for cooking40.05MRanked 29th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of people with access to electricity40.05MRanked 32nd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of people without access to clean fuels for cooking0Ranked 129th—· 2023
- Number of people without access to electricity0Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of people without access to electricity0Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of people without clean fuels for cooking and heating0Ranked 152nd—· 2016
- Oil consumption1,209.2Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Oil consumption1,209.2Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Oil consumption1,209.2Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Oil consumption1,209.2Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Oil consumption per capita30,425.9Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Oil production3,372.1Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Oil production per capita84,848.2Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Other renewables (including geothermal and biomass)30.7Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Clean (mtCO2)11.8Ranked 70th▼ 11· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (mtCO2)112.6Ranked 73rd▼ 74· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (mtCO2)89.2Ranked 79th▼ 63· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (mtCO2)10.5Ranked 67th▼ 12· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (mtCO2)11.4Ranked 71st▼ 11· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (mtCO2)0.97Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2025
- Power sector emissions — CO2 intensity — CO2 intensity (gCO2/kWh)190.7Ranked 31st▼ 16· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Bioenergy (mtCO2)2.3Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Coal (mtCO2)23.4Ranked 42nd▼ 14· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Gas (mtCO2)84.2Ranked 69th▼ 29· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Hydro (mtCO2)8.2Ranked 50th▼ 9· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Nuclear (mtCO2)0.4Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Other Fossil (mtCO2)5Ranked 55th▼ 37· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Solar (mtCO2)0.48Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Wind (mtCO2)0.49Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Total — Total emissions (mtCO2)124.4Ranked 75th▼ 85· 2025
- Primary energy consumption3,886.2Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption3,886.2Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from fossil fuels2,575.7Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from hydropower837.1Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from low-carbon sources1,246.4Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from nuclear power208.5Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from renewables1,038Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from solar and wind power137.2Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from solar power23Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from wind power114.2Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per capita97,784.5Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per capita97,784.5Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per GDP2.3Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Primary energy consumption per GDP2.3Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of population with access to electricity, by urban/rural (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Proportion of population without primary reliance on clean fuels and technologies for cooking (%) - Residence area type: Total0%Ranked 64th▼ 3· 2024
- Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technologies for cooking (%) - Residence area type: Total100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technology (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Renewable capacity: Bioenergy2,708Ranked 14th—· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Renewable hydropower84,126Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Solar photovoltaic5,931Ranked 33rd▲ 6· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Total renewable energy110,511.1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Wind energy17,744.9Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Renewable electricity output (% of total electricity output)67Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2021
- Renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption (%)23.5Ranked 94th▲ 2· 2023
- Renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption (%)24.2%Ranked 93rd▼ 2· 2022
- Renewable generation: Renewable hydropower360,699Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Renewable generation: Solar photovoltaic7,071Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- Renewable generation: Total renewable energy418,837Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Renewables consumption per capita26,117Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Renewables (excl. hydroelectric)7.9%Ranked 85th▲ 5· 2021
- Share of cereals that are allocated to other uses such as biofuel production22%Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2023
- Share of dietary energy from carbohydrates46.5%Ranked 162nd▼ 7· 2023
- Share of dietary energy from fats40.9%Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2023
- Share of dietary energy from protein12.6%Ranked 71st▲ 10· 2023
- Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers28%Ranked 49th—· 2021
- Share of direct primary energy consumption that comes from gas41.4%Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Share of direct primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power2.8%Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by bioenergy1.6%Ranked 40th▼ 17· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by coal4.1%Ranked 42nd▼ 18· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by coal4.1%Ranked 42nd▼ 18· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by coal4.1%Ranked 42nd▼ 18· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by fossil fuels23%Ranked 65th▼ 83· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by gas17.8%Ranked 46th▼ 31· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by hydropower52.8%Ranked 13th▼ 24· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by low-carbon sources77%Ranked 24th▼ 10· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by nuclear power13.1%Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by nuclear power13.1%Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by oil1.2%Ranked 53rd▼ 79· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by renewables63.9%Ranked 24th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by solar and wind power9.4%Ranked 55th▼ 24· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by solar power1.6%Ranked 72nd▼ 51· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by wind power7.9%Ranked 35th▼ 5· 2025
- Share of final energy consumption used by agriculture, forestry and fishing4.4%Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2023
- Share of new cars that are electric11%Ranked 30th▲ 12· 2025
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from coal2.1%Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from fossil fuels67.4%Ranked 64th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from gas33.6%Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from hydropower21.9%Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from low-carbon sources32.6%Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from low-carbon sources32.6%Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power5.5%Ranked 20th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power5.5%Ranked 20th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power5.5%Ranked 20th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from oil31.6%Ranked 53rd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from oil31.6%Ranked 53rd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from renewables27.2%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from solar and wind power3.6%Ranked 45th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from solar power0.6%Ranked 61st▲ 5· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from wind power3%Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of rural population with access100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking0%Ranked 64th▼ 3· 2024
- Solar and wind power consumption per capita3,451.9Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2024
- Solar photovoltaic capacity5.8Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2024
- Solar power consumption per capita577.9Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2024
- Thermal equivalent efficiency factors0.41Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Total deaths from protein-energy malnutrition among both sexes249Ranked 121st▲ 3· 2021
- Total electricity demand per person16,090Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2025
- Total electricity generation652.4Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Total electricity generation as share of primary energy20.5%Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2024
- Total electricity generation per person16,259.5Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2025
- Total electricity generation per person16,259.5Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2025
- Total solar capacity5.8Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2024
- Total wind capacity17.5Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2024
- Urban100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Wind consumption114.2Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Wind power consumption per capita2,874Ranked 15th—· 2024
14.1.1 - Beach litter per square kilometer (Number) - EN_MAR_BEALITSQ
- 14.1.1 - Beach litter per square kilometer (Number) - EN_MAR_BEALITSQ163,600.3Ranked 55th▲ 25· 2022
- 17.7.1 - Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars) - DC_ENVTECH_IMP29.04BRanked 11th▲ 2· 2020
- Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare)86.9Ranked 124th▲ 2· 2025
- Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare)90.4Ranked 117th▼ 1· 2020
- Absolute deaths from ambient PM2.5 air pollution- State of Global Air7,100Ranked 53rd▲ 4· 2015
- Afforestation1,430Ranked 45th▼ 9· 2020
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)8Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)0Ranked 1st· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)8Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Agricultural water withdrawal4.75BRanked 28th▼ 17· 2010
- Agricultural water withdrawals10.7%Ranked 142nd▼ 2· 2022
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)1.9%Ranked 147th▼ 9· 2022
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)150,631.6Ranked 1st—· 2025
- All basins (rivers, lakes & aquifers)69.7%Ranked 33rd▲ 13· 2023
- All water bodies88%Ranked 13th▼ 11· 2023
- Amount of tracked exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)16.84BRanked 15th▲ 1· 2020
- Annual area burnt by wildfires1.16MRanked 27th▲ 18· 2026
- Annual area burnt per wildfire670.3Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2026
- Annual change in domestic forest area-9,818.8Ranked 116th—· 2025
- Annual change in forest area-9,818.8Ranked 116th—· 2025
- Annual change in forest area as share of forest area-0%Ranked 81st—· 2025
- Annual deforestation as share of forest area0.01%Ranked 80th▼ 12· 2020
- Annual forest area change rate (%)0.02Ranked 54th▲ 5· 2025
- Annual forest area change rate (%)-0.01%Ranked 55th▼ 6· 2020
- Annual forest change-0%Ranked 80th—· 2025
- Annual freshwater withdrawals36.13BRanked 19th—· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, agriculture (% of total freshwater withdrawal)10.7Ranked 142nd▼ 2· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, agriculture (% of total freshwater withdrawal)10.7%Ranked 142nd▼ 2· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal)13.5%Ranked 116th▼ 3· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal)13.5Ranked 116th▼ 3· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, industry (% of total freshwater withdrawal)75.8%Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, industry (% of total freshwater withdrawal)75.8Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)36.1Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources)1.3Ranked 144th▼ 2· 2022
- Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter) - Urban6.7Ranked 194th▲ 2· 2019
- Annual number of fires1,730Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2026
- Annual number of fires1,730Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2026
- Annual share of the total land area burnt by wildfires0.07%Ranked 91st▲ 15· 2026
- AQLI6.7Ranked 163rd▲ 32· 2024
- Area from inland water bodies86.61MRanked 1st—· 2019
- Area of planted forest20.71MRanked 4th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)27.4Ranked 120th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)26.2%Ranked 120th—· 2024
- Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)42.2%Ranked 80th—· 2024
- Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)41.7Ranked 84th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)43.7Ranked 91st—· 2025
- Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)41.4%Ranked 93rd—· 2024
- Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)33.8%Ranked 135th—· 2024
- Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)34.1Ranked 139th—· 2025
- Basel Convention100%Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Baseline water stress1.2Ranked 59th· 2023
- Beach litter items per unit of surface area (Number of items per 100 square meters)10Ranked 37th▲ 9· 2024
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the beach (%)66.8Ranked 80th▼ 19· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the beach (Tonnes)449Ranked 110th▼ 1· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the ocean (%)33.2Ranked 64th▲ 19· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the ocean (Tonnes)223Ranked 106th▲ 4· 2021
- Beef3,236.8Ranked 37th▲ 9· 2023
- Biologically sustainable100%Ranked 1st· 2018
- Bird species, threatened22Ranked 40th▲ 5· 2022
- Bird species, threatened22Ranked 40th▲ 5· 2022
- Bottom trawl151,078.5Ranked 26th▲ 5· 2018
- Built-up Area905,276.4Ranked 15th—· 2025
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons)681,733.1Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)14Ranked 190th▼ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)4.9Ranked 103rd▲ 2· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)89.3Ranked 184th—· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)140.3Ranked 137th▲ 2· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e)65.8Ranked 179th▲ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)31.9Ranked 173rd▼ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e)79.4Ranked 171st▲ 2· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e)166.3Ranked 188th—· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e)0.1Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)31.2Ranked 63rd—· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)578Ranked 189th▲ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)11.5Ranked 43rd—· 2023
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e)20.3Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil (Mt CO2e)1.2Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land (Mt CO2e)22.3Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)3.3Ranked 42nd▲ 31· 2023
- Carbon intensity of GDP (kg CO2e per 2021 PPP $ of GDP)0.24Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2024
- Carbon intensity of GDP (kg CO2e per constant 2015 US$ of GDP)0.31Ranked 89th▼ 2· 2024
- Change in maximum river flow (%)11.2Ranked 73rd▲ 5· 2024
- Change in minimum river flow (%)9.5Ranked 71st▲ 5· 2024
- Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)15.6Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2022
- Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)15.7%Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2022
- Consumption of controlled substance (relative to 1986) - Chemical: All (Ozone-depleting)0.01Ranked 124th▼ 4· 2021
- Consumption of controlled substance (zero-filled) - Chemical: All (Ozone-depleting)3.2Ranked 77th▼ 51· 2021
- Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries that established national targets in accordance with Aichi Biodiversity Target 2 of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 in their National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Countries that established national targets in accordance with or similar to Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Target 14 in their national biodiversity strategy and action plans (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2026
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing-House (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2025
- Countries with an allocation from the national budget to manage the threat of invasive alien species (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2020
- Countries with an allocation from the national budget to manage the threat of invasive alien species (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with integrated biodiversity values into national accounting and reporting systems, defined as implementation of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2025
- Countries with integrated biodiversity values into national accounting and reporting systems, defined as implementation of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (1 = YES; 0 = NO) - No breakdown1Ranked 1st· 2024
- Deaths attributed to household air pollution0Ranked 1st· 2019
- Deforestation50,520Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2020
- Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)4Ranked 2nd—· 2026
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation (%)73Ranked 23rd· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation (%)73%Ranked 23rd· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, enabling environment (%)79Ranked 17th· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, financing (%)72Ranked 14th· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, institutions and participation (%)70Ranked 26th· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, management instruments (%)70Ranked 22nd· 2023
- Disaster risk reduction progress score (1-5 scale; 5=best)4.3Ranked 12th· 2011
- discards67,972.4Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2018
- Discards67,972.4Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2018
- Domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material (tonnes) - Total or no breakdown54.3Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Drought risk-9,999Ranked 1st· 2023
- Droughts, floods, extreme temperatures (% of population, average 1990-2009)0.01Ranked 134th· 2009
- Electronic waste collected, per capita (KG)4.1Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2022
- Electronic waste collected (Tonnes)159,382Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Electronic waste generated, per capita (Kg)19.9Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2023
- Electronic waste generated (Tonnes)786,150Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Electronic waste recycled, per capita (Kg)4.1Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2022
- Endemic amphibian species0Ranked 50th· 2025
- Endemic bird species0Ranked 44th· 2025
- Endemic mammal species5Ranked 34th· 2025
- Endemic reef-forming coral species0Ranked 9th· 2025
- Environmental Performance Index (2018)56.9Ranked 72nd· 2018
- Environmental Performance Index (2018)56.9Ranked 72nd· 2018
- Estimated number of wild-caught fish3.7BRanked 43rd· 2019
- Excess nitrogen914,715.3Ranked 12th· 2009
- excess_phosphorous_total54,682.9Ranked 25th· 2009
- Exported beach litter originating from national land-based sources (Tonnes)684Ranked 115th—· 2022
- Exported deforestation1,487.4Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2023
- Exports to Oceania0.14%Ranked 66th▼ 6· 2014
- Extent of inland wetlands (square kilometres)995,148.9Ranked 1st—· 2025
- F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)16.1Ranked 133rd▼ 2· 2024
- Fish catch842,251.1Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Fish species, threatened51Ranked 61st▲ 20· 2022
- Fish species, threatened51Ranked 61st▲ 20· 2022
- Food waste per capita (KG)188.1Ranked 13th▼ 125· 2022
- Food waste (Tonnes)7.23MRanked 27th▼ 17· 2022
- Forest area368.82MRanked 3rd—· 2025
- Forest area as a proportion of total land area (%)42Ranked 71st▼ 6· 2025
- Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares)163,523.7Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares)163.52MRanked 1st—· 2024
- Forest area (thousands of hectares)368,818.9Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Forest expansion40,700Ranked 13th▲ 7· 2020
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%)0.17Ranked 76th▼ 7· 2024
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)3.2Ranked 38th▼ 5· 2024
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars)79.8Ranked 48th▼ 4· 2024
- Freshwater crabs0Ranked 26th· 2025
- Hazardous waste exported, (Tonnes)407,630Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2021
- Hazardous waste generated, per capita (Kg)22.5Ranked 49th· 2012
- Hazardous waste generated, per unit of GDP (kilograms per constant 2015 United States dollars)0Ranked 61st· 2012
- Hazardous waste generated (Tonnes)786,400Ranked 32nd· 2012
- Hazardous waste imported, (Tonnes)720,328.9Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2019
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (number of tables)5Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2024
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (SEEA tables)0Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2024
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (Tourism Satellite Account tables)5Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2024
- Imported deforestation20,089.6Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Imports per person3.9Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2024
- Industrial786,483.8Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2018
- Industrial water withdrawal33.12BRanked 3rd▼ 2· 2005
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area change (%)0.57Ranked 164th▲ 3· 2022
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area (% of total land area)9.3Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area (% of total land area)9.3%Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area (square kilometres)916,377Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Lakes and rivers seasonal water area change (%)29.2Ranked 168th▲ 1· 2022
- Lakes and rivers seasonal water area (% of total land area)1Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2022
- Lakes and rivers seasonal water area (square kilometres)99,001Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Land area in hectares878.87MRanked 4th—· 2023
- Land area (sq. km)8.79MRanked 4th—· 2023
- Land area (thousands of hectares)878,870Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Legislation, Regulation, Act related to the prevention of introduction and management of Invasive Alien Species (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources3.7Ranked 132nd▼ 2· 2022
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources (%)3.7Ranked 133rd▲ 3· 2023
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources (%) - No breakdown3.7%Ranked 131st▼ 3· 2022
- Mammal species, threatened18Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Mammal species, threatened18Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters)9.2%Ranked 50th▲ 5· 2025
- Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters)9.2Ranked 50th▲ 5· 2025
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)30.5Ranked 168th—· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.8Ranked 127th▼ 2· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)71.7Ranked 170th▲ 1· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.25Ranked 118th▼ 4· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)0.18Ranked 60th▲ 3· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.16Ranked 111th▲ 6· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.58Ranked 156th▲ 7· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e)28.9Ranked 194th—· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)37.3Ranked 105th—· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)133.1Ranked 188th▼ 1· 2024
- Methyl Chloroform0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Mismanaged plastic waste23,587Ranked 79th· 2019
- Mismanaged plastic waste per capita0.63Ranked 109th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene from diarrhoea, intestinal nematode infections, malnutrition and acute respiratory infections (deaths per 100,000 population)2.3Ranked 23rd· 2019
- Municipal waste recycled (Tonnes)6.75MRanked 10th▼ 1· 2020
- Municipal waste recycled (Tonnes)6.75MRanked 8th▼ 2· 2020
- Municipal water withdrawal5.88BRanked 13th▼ 2· 2005
- National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- National ocean science expenditure as a share of total research and development funding (%)0.08Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2024
- natural_ha_share77.3Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2010
- ND-GAIN Country Index68Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Net traded deforestation18,602.2Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)31.8Ranked 185th▼ 1· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)1.4Ranked 158th▼ 4· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.11Ranked 109th▲ 8· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.32Ranked 126th▼ 3· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)3.6Ranked 180th▼ 4· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.22Ranked 100th▼ 6· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e)2.1Ranked 172nd▲ 2· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e)1.3Ranked 166th▼ 6· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)1.7Ranked 56th▼ 5· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)40.9Ranked 193rd▼ 2· 2024
- Not using improved drinking water sources679,491.9Ranked 53rd▼ 3· 2024
- Number of companies publishing sustainability reports with disclosure by dimension, by level of requirement (Number)254Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Number of companies publishing sustainability reports with disclosure by dimension, by level of requirement (Number) - No breakdown254Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Number of countries using ecosystem-based approaches to managing marine areas (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2023
- Number of countries using ecosystem-based approaches to managing marine areas (1 = YES; 0 = NO) - No breakdown - No breakdown1Ranked 1st· 2023
- Number of people in rural areas not using improved drinking water sources110,385.7Ranked 80th▼ 3· 2024
- Number of people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities88,809.5Ranked 82nd▼ 3· 2024
- Number of people not using improved drinking water sources679,492.1Ranked 62nd▼ 2· 2024
- Number of people not using improved sanitation facilities561,209.6Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of people not using safely managed drinking water sources1.24MRanked 66th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of people not using safely managed sanitation7.43MRanked 49th—· 2024
- Number of people using at least a basic drinking water source39.06MRanked 31st—· 2024
- Number of people with at least basic sanitation39.18MRanked 29th—· 2024
- Open defecation0Ranked 104th▼ 3· 2024
- Open defecation0Ranked 89th▼ 4· 2024
- Open dumps0%Ranked 158th· 2020
- Other uses4,305.9Ranked 20th—· 2015
- Outdoor air pollution exposure (population-weighted PM2.5)7Ranked 26th▼ 17· 2024
- Ozone concentration57Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2015
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Basel Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Minamata Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)66.7Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Montreal Protocol on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Rotterdam Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Stockholm Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)100Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2025
- Per capita plastic waste0.09Ranked 68th· 2010
- Per capita plastic waste emitted to the ocean0.01Ranked 99th· 2019
- Permanent agriculture12,630Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2024
- Plant species (higher), threatened21Ranked 96th▲ 14· 2022
- Plastic percent of waste composition3Ranked 1st· 2004
- Plastic pollution entering the ocean through rivers238Ranked 45th· 2019
- Plastic waste emitted to the ocean238Ranked 77th· 2019
- Plastic waste emitted to the ocean per capita0.01Ranked 99th· 2019
- Plastic waste generation1.9MRanked 28th· 2020
- Plastic waste generation (tonnes, total)1.15MRanked 42nd· 2010
- PM2.5 air pollution, mean annual exposure (micrograms per cubic meter)6.6Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO guideline value (% of total)0Ranked 1st—· 2017
- PM2.5 exposure6.6Ranked 179th—· 2023
- PM2.5 pollution (mean annual exposure)6.6Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-1 value (% of total)0Ranked 1st—· 2017
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-2 value (% of total)0Ranked 1st—· 2017
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-3 value (% of total)0Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)4.6Ranked 206th—· 2023
- Population in largest city6.49MRanked 34th—· 2025
- Population in the largest city (% of urban population)18.8Ranked 116th▲ 2· 2025
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million18.32MRanked 22nd—· 2025
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population)44Ranked 19th—· 2025
- Population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)1.4Ranked 144th▲ 4· 2015
- Population living in slums (% of urban population)1.1Ranked 122nd▲ 15· 2022
- Probability of mismanaged plastic waste reaching the ocean via rivers0.55%Ranked 73rd· 2019
- Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)5Ranked 1st—· 2026
- Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)5Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Proportion of bodies of water with good ambient water quality (%)88Ranked 13th▼ 11· 2023
- Proportion of electronic waste collected (%)20.6Ranked 14th▲ 7· 2022
- Proportion of electronic waste recycled (%)20.6Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels (not overexploited) (%)100Ranked 1st· 2018
- Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels (not overexploited) (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2018
- Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)61.3Ranked 35th—· 2025
- Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)60.8%Ranked 32nd—· 2020
- Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas (%)8.5%Ranked 111th▲ 2· 2020
- Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas (%)9.8Ranked 130th▼ 8· 2025
- Proportion of land that is degraded over total land area (%)11.7Ranked 59th▲ 5· 2019
- Proportion of land that is degraded over total land area (%)11.7%Ranked 59th▲ 5· 2019
- Proportion of municipal waste recycled (%)19.6Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2018
- Proportion of population practicing open defecation, by urban/rural (%)0Ranked 104th▼ 3· 2024
- Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services, by urban/rural (%)96.9Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of population using safely managed sanitation services, by urban/rural (%)81.3Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- Proportion of river water bodies with good ambient water quality (%)88Ranked 13th▼ 10· 2023
- Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)68.3Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2024
- Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)68.3%Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2024
- Proportion of transboundary aquifers with an operational arrangement for water cooperation (%)0Ranked 41st▲ 8· 2023
- Proportion of transboundary basins (river and lake basins and aquifers) with an operational arrangement for water cooperation (%)69.7Ranked 33rd▲ 13· 2023
- Proportion of transboundary river and lake basins with an operational arrangement for water cooperation (%)91.3Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of wastewater safely treated, by activity and location (%)183.7Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Proportion of wastewater treated, by activity and location (%)253.1Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Readiness0.64Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Readiness: economic0.6Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Readiness: governance0.76Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2024
- Readiness: social0.57Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2024
- Recipient countries of global funding with access to any funding from global financial mechanisms for projects related to invasive alien species management (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Red List Index0.96Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2025
- Red List Index0.97Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)73,170.5Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)73,170.5Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)73,170.5Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)2,850Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)2,850Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- River flow maximum (m3/s)7.18MRanked 4th—· 2024
- River flow minimum (m3/s)1.62MRanked 3rd—· 2024
- Riverine flood risk2.2Ranked 75th· 2023
- Rural population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.55Ranked 124th▲ 6· 2015
- Safely managed96.9%Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2024
- Settlements and infrastructure4,707Ranked 5th—· 2024
- share_global_excess_nitrogen1.2%Ranked 12th· 2009
- share_global_excess_phosphorous0.39%Ranked 25th· 2009
- Share of annual global forest expansion0.76%Ranked 13th▲ 7· 2020
- Share of firms that were asked to pay a bribe to get a water connection23.4%Ranked 5th· 2024
- Share of fish stocks that are overexploited0%Ranked 33rd· 2018
- Share of global deforestation0.6%Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2020
- Share of global forest area8.9%Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Share of global mismanaged plastic waste0.04%Ranked 79th· 2019
- Share of global plastic waste emitted to the ocean0.02%Ranked 77th· 2019
- Share of global plastic waste exports0%Ranked 74th▲ 68· 2024
- Share of global plastic waste imports3.3%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of land covered by forest42%Ranked 74th—· 2025
- Share of the population not using improved drinking water sources1.7%Ranked 89th▼ 6· 2024
- Share of the population using an improved drinking water source98.3%Ranked 68th▲ 3· 2024
- Share of the population using at least a basic drinking water source98.3%Ranked 51st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of the population using safely managed drinking water96.9%Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of the rural population using at least a basic drinking water source98.5%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of the urban population using at least a basic drinking water source98.3%Ranked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of total municipal solid waste collected99%Ranked 7th· 2020
- Share of urban population98.3%Ranked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- Sharks & Rays0Ranked 15th· 2025
- Surface water0Ranked 102nd▼ 5· 2024
- Surface water0Ranked 94th▼ 3· 2024
- Surface water0Ranked 80th▼ 5· 2024
- Sustainable fisheries as a proportion of GDP0.07Ranked 48th▼ 10· 2021
- Terrain Ruggedness Index 100m (Nunn and Puga 2012)77.5Ranked 115th· 1996
- Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)12.9%Ranked 109th▲ 2· 2025
- Threatened endemic bird species0Ranked 27th· 2025
- Threatened endemic mammal species1Ranked 26th· 2025
- Threatened endemic reef-forming coral species0Ranked 5th· 2025
- Total5.16MRanked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- total_deforestation3,236.8Ranked 53rd▲ 11· 2023
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)30.1Ranked 67th—· 2024
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)768.1Ranked 193rd—· 2024
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)18.6Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e)758.5Ranked 167th—· 2023
- Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by donor countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)203.5Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2024
- Total plastic pollution3,023.7Ranked 80th· 2020
- Total plastic pollution per capita0.08Ranked 16th· 2020
- Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture to the country (number)2,515Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Total wastewater generated (million m3/year)3,113.6Ranked 13th· 2022
- Total wastewater safely treated (million m3/year)5,718.2Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Total wastewater treated (million m3/year)7,881.9Ranked 6th· 2022
- Total water withdrawal per capita1,113Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2010
- Trade-adjusted deforestation per person6.4Ranked 55th▲ 1· 2023
- Unknown gear34,592.9Ranked 27th▼ 16· 2018
- Urban population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.89Ranked 143rd▲ 3· 2015
- Urban usage98.3%Ranked 74th▼ 1· 2024
- Using improved drinking water soures98.3%Ranked 68th▲ 3· 2024
- Vienna Convention and Montreal Protocol (Parties Subscribing each Year)1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Water productivity, total (constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal)49.5Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2022
- Water productivity, total (constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal)49.5Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2022
- Water Use Efficiency (United States dollars per cubic meter)45.4Ranked 51st—· 2023
- Wildfire4.44MRanked 1st—· 2024
- Wild fish catch from bottom trawling151,078.5Ranked 26th▲ 5· 2018
- Yearly burned area across all land types4.62MRanked 19th▲ 12· 2024
- Yearly burned area in other land types66,179.3Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2024
- Yearly burned area in shrublands and grasslands114,241.3Ranked 52nd▲ 20· 2024
- Yield gap versus nitrogen pollution effect0%Ranked 52nd· 2020
other
Actual Progress
10 Mbits/s and over
- 10 Mbits/s and over16.22MRanked 16th—· 2023
- AI scholarly publications - Field: All8,444Ranked 9th—· 2024
- AI scholarly publications per million people - Field: All212.5Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Annual number of objects launched into outer space6Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2025
- Annual patent applications4,710Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2021
- Annual patents filed for carbon capture and storage technologies11Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Any speed42.5Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- AS numbers delegated2,444Ranked 8th· 2026
- Both sexes38%Ranked 4th· 2022
- Carbon dioxide emissions from fuel combustion (millions of tonnes)522.9Ranked 134th▼ 5· 2023
- Carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP PPP (kilogrammes of CO2 per constant 2021 United States dollars)0.23Ranked 119th▼ 1· 2023
- Cumulative number of objects launched into outer space118Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2025
- Developers3.99MRanked 11th▲ 1· 2026
- Female share of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) programmes, tertiary (%)31.4Ranked 60th▲ 5· 2016
- Firms that introduced a new product/service and process, and spent on R&D1.6Ranked 35th· 2024
- Fixed broadband subscriptions16.9MRanked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Fixed broadband subscriptions16.9MRanked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people)42.5Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions10.97MRanked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions10.97MRanked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people)27.6Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people)27.6Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2024
- GERD as a percentage of GDP1.8Ranked 1st▼ 21· 2024
- Git pushes8.23MRanked 9th—· 2026
- Individuals using the Internet, female (% of female population)94Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2022
- Individuals using the Internet, male (% of male population)95Ranked 9th▼ 7· 2022
- Interconnection facilities166Ranked 8th· 2026
- Internet exchange points28Ranked 10th· 2026
- IPv4 addresses delegated67.82MRanked 9th· 2026
- IPv6 prefixes delegated1,134Ranked 14th· 2026
- Landline phone subscriptions10.97MRanked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Landline phone subscriptions27.6Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2024
- Life science patents granted, by filing office5,904Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Male69%Ranked 5th· 2022
- Mobile94.1Ranked 123rd▼ 9· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions37.4MRanked 41st▼ 2· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions37.4MRanked 41st▼ 2· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)94.1Ranked 123rd▼ 9· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)94.1Ranked 123rd▼ 9· 2024
- Number of Internet users36.12MRanked 26th▼ 1· 2021
- Number of patents in electric vehicle machine technology9Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2023
- Number of patents in solar photovoltaic technology2Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2024
- Patent applications per million people123.2Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, both sexes (%)70.6%Ranked 81st▲ 12· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, female (%)80.6%Ranked 84th▲ 14· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, male (%)57%Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.41Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, both sexes (%)25.1%Ranked 34th—· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, female (%)15.7%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, male (%)38%Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education who are female (%)36.3%Ranked 42nd▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.27Ranked 49th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, both sexes (%)6.3%Ranked 35th—· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, female (%)2.9%Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, male (%)10.9%Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 41st▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, both sexes (%)8.1%Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, female (%)8.2%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, male (%)7.9%Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, both sexes (%)10.6%Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, female (%)12.9%Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, male (%)7.4%Ranked 40th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 18th—· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 5th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.57Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, both sexes (%)28%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 22nd· 2015
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.44Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, both sexes (%)37%Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, female (%)37%Ranked 7th· 2015
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, high socio-economic status (%)50%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, low socio-economic status (%)22%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, male (%)41%Ranked 7th· 2015
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, female (%)26%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, high socio-economic status (%)30%Ranked 11th—· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, low socio-economic status (%)17%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, male (%)30%Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence – adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 10th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.69Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension - Confidence, both sexes (%)30%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, female (%)28%Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, high socio-economic status (%)32%Ranked 12th▲ 4· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, low socio-economic status (%)22%Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, male (%)32%Ranked 5th—· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, rural (%)30%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, urban (%)31%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 16th▼ 4· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment – adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 11th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.71Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension - Enjoyment, both sexes (%)23%Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, female (%)22%Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, high socio-economic status (%)24%Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, low socio-economic status (%)17%Ranked 16th—· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, male (%)24%Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, rural (%)23%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, urban (%)23%Ranked 15th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, rural (%)29%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, urban (%)28%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Pharmaceuticals2,144Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 2G mobile network (%)99.7Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 3G mobile network (%)99.7Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 4G mobile network (%)99.5Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 5G mobile network (%)94.3Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2024
- Repositories9.87MRanked 10th—· 2026
- Research and development expenditure as a proportion of GDP (%)1.8Ranked 1st▼ 21· 2024
- Researchers (in full-time equivalent) per million inhabitants (per 1,000,000 population)5,624.3Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Researchers in R&D (per million people)5,624.3Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Researchers per million inhabitants (FTE)5,624.3Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Scientific and technical journal articles63,719.9Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Scientific and technical journal articles per million people1,591Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Secure Internet servers1.64MRanked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- Secure Internet servers (per 1 million people)39,738Ranked 32nd▲ 4· 2024
Agricultural raw materials exports (% of merchandise exports)
- Agricultural raw materials exports (% of merchandise exports)2.9Ranked 27th▼ 10· 2024
- Agricultural raw materials imports (% of merchandise imports)0.74Ranked 92nd▼ 19· 2024
- All products1.4%Ranked 96th▲ 5· 2022
- Annual growth of exports of goods and services (%)5.4%Ranked 43rd▼ 78· 2023
- Annual growth of imports of goods and services (%)0.87%Ranked 67th▼ 28· 2023
- Average time to clear imports through customs (days)5.4Ranked 33rd· 2024
- Binding coverage, all products (%)0Ranked 19th▲ 11· 2022
- Binding coverage, manufactured products (%)0Ranked 15th▲ 11· 2022
- Binding coverage, primary products (%)0Ranked 19th▲ 14· 2022
- Bound rate, simple mean, all products (%)4.9Ranked 106th▼ 2· 2021
- Bound rate, simple mean, manufactured products (%)5.7Ranked 104th▼ 1· 2021
- Bound rate, simple mean, primary products (%)2.7Ranked 106th▼ 2· 2021
- China’s rank among import partners2Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2024
- Commercial service exports (current US$)170.72BRanked 11th▼ 3· 2025
- Commercial service imports (current US$)167.83BRanked 13th—· 2025
- Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service exports)50.5Ranked 39th▼ 11· 2025
- Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service imports)48.6Ranked 32nd▼ 12· 2025
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise exports (%)2.4%Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services exports (%)1.7%Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2022
- Difference in the value of goods exported to and imported by the US (DOTS (2017))-19.52BRanked 194th· 2016
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)560.95BRanked 12th▼ 1· 2025
- Export unit value index (2015 = 100)128.7Ranked 111th▲ 4· 2024
- Export value index (2015 = 100)138.7Ranked 117th▲ 6· 2024
- Export volume index (2015 = 100)107.8Ranked 103rd▼ 7· 2024
- Firms exporting directly at least 10% of sales (% of firms)12.3Ranked 17th· 2024
- Food exports (% of merchandise exports)13.5Ranked 72nd▼ 19· 2024
- Food imports (% of merchandise imports)9.2Ranked 101st▼ 33· 2024
- Fuel exports (% of merchandise exports)27.7Ranked 22nd▼ 8· 2024
- Fuel imports (% of merchandise imports)6.5Ranked 116th▼ 29· 2024
- Goods554.75BRanked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- High-technology exports (current US$)36BRanked 21st▲ 1· 2024
- ICT goods exports (% of total goods exports)1.4Ranked 51st▼ 5· 2024
- ICT goods imports (% total goods imports)6.3Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2024
- Imports from China as a share of total imports11.6%Ranked 125th▲ 4· 2024
- Imports of goods and services620.41BRanked 10th—· 2025
- Imports of goods from North America331.04BRanked 2nd—· 2024
- Imports of goods from North America331.04BRanked 2nd—· 2024
- Imports of palm oil110,000Ranked 51st—· 2023
- Imports of pandemic-related customs (per-capita)0Ranked 146th▼ 4· 2021
- Import unit value index (2015 = 100)117.2Ranked 131st▼ 3· 2024
- Import value index (2015 = 100)133.5Ranked 129th▲ 5· 2024
- Import volume index (2015 = 100)114Ranked 108th▲ 13· 2024
- Insurance and financial services (% of commercial service exports)9.8Ranked 18th▼ 13· 2025
- Insurance and financial services (% of commercial service imports)9Ranked 36th▼ 16· 2025
- Manufactures exports (% of merchandise exports)42.3Ranked 63rd▼ 9· 2024
- Manufactures exports (% of merchandise exports)42.3%Ranked 63rd▼ 9· 2024
- Manufactures imports (% of merchandise imports)75.5Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Medium and high-tech exports (% manufactured exports)50.4Ranked 40th▼ 5· 2022
- Merchandise exports by the reporting economy (current US$)567.83BRanked 11th—· 2023
- Merchandise exports by the reporting economy, residual (% of total merchandise exports)0.03Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports (current US$)554.68BRanked 15th▲ 3· 2025
- Merchandise exports to economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise exports)1.1Ranked 132nd▼ 7· 2023
- Merchandise exports to high-income economies (% of total merchandise exports)90.6Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise exports)4.9Ranked 110th▲ 6· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise exports)0.28Ranked 137th▲ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise exports)2.4Ranked 60th▲ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Middle East & North Africa (% of total merchandise exports)0.5Ranked 99th▼ 5· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise exports)0.89Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise exports)0.38Ranked 145th▲ 8· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies outside region (% of total merchandise exports)9.3Ranked 112th▼ 5· 2023
- Merchandise exports, total (all partners)563.98BRanked 11th—· 2025
- Merchandise imports by the reporting economy (current US$)585.79BRanked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Merchandise imports by the reporting economy, residual (% of total merchandise imports)0Ranked 62nd▼ 16· 2023
- Merchandise imports (current US$)577.44BRanked 14th▲ 1· 2025
- Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports)0.93Ranked 123rd▲ 6· 2023
- Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports)71.6Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise imports)15.8Ranked 115th▲ 13· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise imports)0.55Ranked 151st▲ 2· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise imports)9.1Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Middle East & North Africa (% of total merchandise imports)0.32Ranked 120th▼ 2· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise imports)1.5Ranked 128th▲ 12· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise imports)1.1Ranked 85th▼ 5· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies outside region (% of total merchandise imports)28.4Ranked 71st▲ 4· 2023
- Merchandise imports, total (all partners)571.11BRanked 12th▼ 1· 2025
- Ores and metals exports (% of merchandise exports)7.2Ranked 38th▼ 11· 2024
- Ores and metals imports (% of merchandise imports)3.2Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of tariff lines applied to imports with zero-tariff (%) - Total or no breakdown55.2%Ranked 159th▼ 3· 2023
- Share of services in total goods and services exports23.7%Ranked 60th▼ 37· 2025
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products (%)1.8Ranked 100th▼ 12· 2022
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)1.5Ranked 101st▼ 5· 2022
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%)3.5Ranked 99th▼ 7· 2022
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)1.4Ranked 96th▲ 5· 2022
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)1.4%Ranked 96th▲ 5· 2022
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products (%)0.76Ranked 101st▲ 5· 2022
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%)4.1Ranked 65th▲ 4· 2022
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, all products (%)3Ranked 84th▼ 19· 2022
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, manufactured products (%)2.4Ranked 82nd▼ 16· 2022
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, primary products (%)5Ranked 84th▼ 17· 2022
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, all products (%)3.1Ranked 98th▼ 17· 2022
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, manufactured products (%)2.6Ranked 98th▼ 14· 2022
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products (%)5.4Ranked 85th▼ 17· 2022
- Transport services (% of commercial service exports)9.6Ranked 72nd▼ 48· 2025
- Transport services (% of commercial service imports)16.9Ranked 81st▼ 63· 2025
- Travel services (% of commercial service exports)30.1Ranked 49th▼ 41· 2025
- Travel services (% of commercial service imports)25.5Ranked 31st▼ 19· 2025