Iran, Islamic Rep.
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Region Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & PakistanIncome Upper middle incomeCapital TehranISO3 IRN
Human development
0.799
HDI, 0–1 scale
GDP per capita
16,833.8PPP $
2021 international $
Life expectancy
77.9yrs
At birth
Governance
32.9/100
Avg. of six WGI
Governance
Control of Corruption
- Control of Corruption24.6Ranked 173rd▼ 4· 2024
- Government Effectiveness37.6Ranked 154th▼ 1· 2024
- Political Stability & Absence of Violence38.9Ranked 184th▲ 3· 2024
- Rule of Law35.7Ranked 184th▲ 4· 2024
- Regulatory Quality31Ranked 191st▼ 1· 2024
- Voice & Accountability29.7Ranked 186th▼ 3· 2024
- Military spending2%Ranked 56th▲ 18· 2024
- Women in parliament4.9%Ranked 163rd▲ 1· 2025
- V-Dem electoral democracy0.16Ranked 133rd▼ 7· 2025
- V-Dem liberal democracy0.1Ranked 127th▼ 9· 2025
- Human rights index (V-Dem)0.25Ranked 134th▲ 4· 2025
- Civil liberties index (V-Dem)0.25Ranked 134th▲ 4· 2025
- Freedom of expression index (V-Dem)0.17Ranked 130th▲ 9· 2025
- Participatory democracy index (V-Dem)0.04Ranked 147th▼ 6· 2025
- Deliberative democracy index (V-Dem)0.09Ranked 133rd▲ 5· 2025
- Egalitarian democracy index (V-Dem)0.15Ranked 124th▲ 4· 2025
- Women's political empowerment index (V-Dem)0.32Ranked 142nd▲ 2· 2025
- Rule of law index (V-Dem)0.21Ranked 123rd▼ 6· 2025
- 17.19.1 - Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen statistical capacity in developing countries (current United States dollars) - SG_STT_CAPTY97,467Ranked 120th▼ 26· 2020
- 8.8.2 - Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining) based on International Labour Organization (ILO) textual sources and national legislation - SL_LBR_NTLCPL10Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Absence of corruption Index (IDEA)33.6Ranked 125th▼ 3· 2021
- Academic freedom index0.06Ranked 150th▲ 14· 2025
- Access to justice for men0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Access to justice for women0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Access to justice Index (IDEA)44.4Ranked 129th▲ 10· 2021
- Accountability index-0.55Ranked 142nd▼ 1· 2025
- Annual change in Checks on Government Index (IDEA)-4.7Ranked 140th▲ 24· 2021
- Annual change in civil society Participation Index (IDEA)0Ranked 39th▲ 6· 2021
- Annual change in democracy index (EIU)-0.7Ranked 28th▲ 7· 2019
- Annual change in Direct democracy Index (IDEA)-0.04Ranked 66th▼ 21· 2021
- Annual change in Electoral Participation Index (IDEA)6.7Ranked 5th▼ 41· 2021
- Annual change in Fundamental Rights Index (IDEA)-5Ranked 143rd▲ 71· 2021
- Annual change in Impartial Administration Index (IDEA)-0.12Ranked 91st▲ 28· 2021
- Annual change in Local Democracy Index (IDEA)-1.3Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2021
- Annual change in Representative Government Index (IDEA)-1.5Ranked 123rd▼ 14· 2021
- Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force)2.4Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2020
- Armed forces personnel, total650,000Ranked 10th—· 2020
- Arms exports (SIPRI trend indicator values)226MRanked 16th▲ 2· 2024
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values)42MRanked 61st▼ 5· 2024
- Associational and organizational rights (E)1Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Basic state functions6Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2025
- Birth register implemented1Ranked 1st—· 2015
- BTI0.33Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Central estimate-0.91Ranked 117th▼ 1· 2010
- Checks on Government Index (IDEA)37.7Ranked 141st▲ 5· 2021
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Citizen support for democracy-1.1Ranked 121st▼ 4· 2020
- Civil liberties aggregate score7Ranked 54th▲ 2· 2024
- Civil liberties index0.25Ranked 134th▲ 2· 2025
- Civil Liberties index (FH)6Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Civil liberties Index (IDEA)37.7Ranked 151st▼ 2· 2021
- Civil liberties rating7Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Civil liberties rating (1-7)7Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Civil liberties score6Ranked 54th—· 2025
- Civil rights1Ranked 10th—· 2025
- Civil society participation index0.15Ranked 137th▼ 7· 2025
- Civil society participation Index (IDEA)44.5Ranked 105th▲ 4· 2021
- Clean elections index0.24Ranked 109th▼ 6· 2025
- Clean Elections Index (IDEA)35.3Ranked 138th▼ 2· 2021
- Clientelism Index0.38Ranked 101st▲ 8· 2025
- Common good justifications0.03Ranked 125th—· 2025
- Competitive elections0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Competitiveness of executive recruitment1Ranked 3rd—· 2018
- Competitiveness of political participation2Ranked 4th—· 2018
- Completeness of birth registration (%)98.6%Ranked 8th· 2010
- Completeness of cause-of-death data (%)90.1%Ranked 11th· 2016
- Constraints on the executive2Ranked 6th—· 2018
- Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.1Ranked 173rd▼ 4· 2024
- Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)24.6Ranked 173rd▼ 4· 2024
- Core civil society index0.14Ranked 136th▼ 7· 2025
- Core civil society index0.14Ranked 134th▼ 7· 2025
- Corruption Perception Index, CPI24Ranked 58th▲ 4· 2023
- Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)23Ranked 55th▼ 4· 2024
- Corruption Perceptions Index rank149Ranked 59th▲ 4· 2023
- Corruption Perceptions Index score24Ranked 59th▲ 4· 2023
- Countries that adopt and implement constitutional, statutory and/or policy guarantees for public access to information1Ranked 1st· 2024
- Countries that adopt and implement constitutional, statutory and/or policy guarantees for public access to information1Ranked 1st· 2025
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing-House (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Countries with at least one verified case of enforced disappearance of human rights defenders, journalists, and trade unionists (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with at least one verified case of killings of human rights defenders, journalists, and trade unionists (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant)0Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant)0Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Country is a full democracy0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- CPI number of sources6Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)4Ranked 2nd· 2018
- Deliberative democracy index0.09Ranked 134th▲ 5· 2025
- Deliberative political institutions index0.28Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2025
- Democracy-7Ranked 18th—· 2018
- Democracy Index3Ranked 18th—· 2018
- Democracy index (EIU)23.8Ranked 133rd▲ 2· 2019
- Democratic electoral institutions2Ranked 11th—· 2025
- Democratic Features Index2.8Ranked 94th▼ 11· 2025
- Detected victims of human trafficking for forced labour, servitude and slavery, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 48th▼ 6· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for forced labour, servitude and slavery, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for other purposes, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2022
- Detected victims of human trafficking for other purposes, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2022
- Detected victims of human trafficking for removal of organ, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for removal of organ, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for sexual exploitation, by age and sex (number)0Ranked 61st▲ 2· 2020
- Detected victims of human trafficking for sexual exploitation, by age and sex (per 100,000 population)0Ranked 62nd▲ 4· 2020
- Diagonal accountability index-0.8Ranked 145th—· 2025
- Direct Democracy Index0.03Ranked 73rd▼ 2· 2025
- Direct Democracy Index (IDEA)1.5Ranked 117th▼ 3· 2021
- Domestic policymaking free from foreign influence1.1Ranked 104th▼ 5· 2025
- Effective parliament Index (IDEA)45Ranked 114th▲ 28· 2021
- Effective power to govern2Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Egalitarian component index0.5Ranked 101st▼ 5· 2025
- Egalitarian democracy index0.15Ranked 125th▲ 4· 2025
- Egalitarian political institutions index0.5Ranked 100th▼ 6· 2025
- Elected Government Index (IDEA)30.6Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2021
- Elected local governments0.08Ranked 118th▼ 6· 2025
- Elected officials index0.5Ranked 18th—· 2025
- Elected regional governments0.02Ranked 113th—· 2025
- Elections for chief executive0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Elections for chief executive and legislature0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Electoral democracy0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Electoral democracy0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Electoral democracy0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.16Ranked 133rd▼ 7· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.16Ranked 132nd▼ 8· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.16Ranked 135th▼ 7· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.16Ranked 133rd▼ 7· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.16Ranked 133rd▼ 7· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.16Ranked 133rd▼ 7· 2025
- Electoral Participation Index (IDEA)46.9Ranked 119th▼ 12· 2021
- Electoral process (A)2Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Elite consultation-0.72Ranked 149th▲ 5· 2025
- Engaged in religious/spiritual activities56.3%Ranked 31st· 2020
- Engaged in religious/spiritual activities56.3%Ranked 31st· 2020
- Engaged in religious/spiritual activities56.3%Ranked 31st· 2020
- Engaged society-0.85Ranked 148th▲ 7· 2025
- Equal access to power index0.36Ranked 122nd▼ 12· 2025
- Equality before the law and individual liberty0.3Ranked 128th▲ 2· 2025
- Equality before the law and individual liberty index0.3Ranked 126th▲ 2· 2025
- Equal resource distribution index0.56Ranked 81st▼ 1· 2025
- Equal rights of inheritance for sons and daughters when no will is left0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Equal rights protection index0.56Ranked 96th▼ 3· 2025
- Executive corruption index0.65Ranked 103rd▼ 13· 2025
- Executive Corruption Index0.65Ranked 57th▲ 9· 2025
- Extremely important72%Ranked 13th· 2020
- Extremely important72%Ranked 13th· 2020
- FIW A10Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW A21Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW A31Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW B10Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW B21Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW B30Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW B41Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW C10Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW C20Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW C30Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW D10Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW D20Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW D30Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- FIW D40Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW E10Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW E20Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW E31Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW F11Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW F20Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW F30Ranked 5th—· 2024
- FIW F41Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW G11Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW G21Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW G31Ranked 4th—· 2024
- FIW G41Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Foreign policymaking free from foreign influence0.27Ranked 147th—· 2025
- Free and fair elections0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Free and fair elections4Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Free and fair elections index0.24Ranked 108th▼ 6· 2025
- Freedom in the World total score11Ranked 78th▲ 4· 2024
- Freedom of association2Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Freedom of association and assembly Index (IDEA)29.1Ranked 100th▼ 2· 2021
- Freedom of association (thick)0.09Ranked 132nd▼ 7· 2025
- Freedom of association thick index0.09Ranked 130th▼ 8· 2025
- Freedom of expression1Ranked 10th—· 2025
- Freedom of expression and alternative sources of information0.17Ranked 132nd▲ 10· 2025
- Freedom of expression and belief (D)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2024
- Freedom of expression Index (IDEA)38.1Ranked 106th▼ 3· 2021
- Freedom of the Press0Ranked 3rd—· 2016
- Functioning of government (C)0Ranked 13th—· 2024
- GDP per capita18,473.1Ranked 63rd—· 2022
- Government censorship of the media-1.5Ranked 147th—· 2025
- Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-0.71Ranked 153rd▼ 1· 2024
- Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100)37.6Ranked 153rd▼ 1· 2024
- GSoD: Access to Justice0.52Ranked 106th▼ 4· 2020
- GSoD: Checks on Government0.42Ranked 124th—· 2020
- GSoD: Civil Liberties0.38Ranked 145th▼ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Clean Elections0.36Ranked 133rd▲ 20· 2020
- GSoD: Effective Parliament0.56Ranked 81st▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Elected Government0.31Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Free Political Parties0.28Ranked 146th▲ 3· 2020
- GSoD: Fundamental Rights0.46Ranked 120th▼ 4· 2020
- GSoD: Impartial Administration0.38Ranked 118th▲ 5· 2020
- GSoD: Inclusive Suffrage0.81Ranked 140th▼ 2· 2020
- GSoD: Judicial Independence0.26Ranked 142nd▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: Media Integrity0.42Ranked 134th▲ 3· 2020
- GSoD: Representative Government0.26Ranked 144th▲ 7· 2020
- GSoD: SD22A0.37Ranked 105th▲ 10· 2020
- GSoD: SD22B0.27Ranked 98th▲ 5· 2020
- GSoD: SD22C0.33Ranked 41st▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: SD22D0.5Ranked 66th▼ 8· 2020
- GSoD: SD22E0.34Ranked 131st▼ 6· 2020
- GSoD: SD23A0.38Ranked 118th▼ 5· 2020
- GSoD: SD23B0.64Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: SD23C0.25Ranked 158th—· 2020
- GSoD: SD410.34Ranked 120th▲ 3· 2020
- GSoD: SD420.45Ranked 99th▲ 1· 2020
- GSoD: SD510.45Ranked 90th▼ 14· 2020
- GSoD: SD520.4Ranked 124th▲ 78· 2020
- GSoD: SD530.01Ranked 92nd▼ 2· 2020
- GSoD: SD540.04Ranked 124th▲ 2· 2020
- GSoD: Social Rights and Equality0.33Ranked 135th▼ 1· 2020
- Horizontal accountability index-0.09Ranked 113th▼ 7· 2025
- Human rights index0.25Ranked 134th▲ 4· 2025
- Human rights index0.25Ranked 134th▲ 4· 2025
- Human rights index0.25Ranked 134th▲ 4· 2025
- Human Rights Protection Scores – by Christopher Farris and Keith Schnakenberg-1.7Ranked 178th▲ 6· 2019
- Index of the civil liberties (EIU)14.7Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2019
- Index of the electoral process and pluralism (EIU)0Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2019
- Judicial constraints on the executive index0.12Ranked 138th▲ 3· 2025
- Judicial constraints on the executive index0.12Ranked 140th▲ 4· 2025
- Judicial Corruption Score-1.1Ranked 129th▼ 1· 2025
- Justified political positions0.04Ranked 114th▼ 3· 2025
- Know friends or family with anxiety or depression41.6%Ranked 44th· 2020
- Learning-adjusted years of schooling8.2Ranked 83rd▲ 4· 2020
- Legislative constraints on the executive index0.52Ranked 85th▼ 24· 2025
- Legislative constraints on the executive index0.52Ranked 84th▼ 24· 2025
- Legislative Corruption Score-1.5Ranked 136th▲ 3· 2025
- Legislative elections1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- LGBT+ rights index-2.5Ranked 106th▼ 2· 2019
- Liberal component index0.32Ranked 119th▼ 8· 2025
- Liberal component index0.32Ranked 118th▼ 7· 2025
- Liberal democracy index0.1Ranked 127th▼ 9· 2025
- Liberal democracy index0.1Ranked 127th▼ 10· 2025
- Liberal political institutions0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Life expectancy77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Lower/single house seats285Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2026
- Male15.4%Ranked 98th· 2020
- Male respondents38.5%Ranked 52nd· 2020
- Media Corruption Score-1.5Ranked 154th▲ 1· 2025
- Military expenditure (current LCU)3646.06TRanked 2nd—· 2024
- Military expenditure (current USD)7.89BRanked 33rd▲ 1· 2024
- Military expenditure (% of general government expenditure)12.5Ranked 21st▲ 9· 2024
- Multiparty elections0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Multi-party elections for government's chief executive1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Multiparty elections for legislature1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Neopatrimonialism index0.82Ranked 126th▼ 6· 2025
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)55,709Ranked 77th▲ 39· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$)15.14MRanked 6th▼ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$)35,035Ranked 69th—· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$)52,160Ranked 133rd▲ 6· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Czechia (current US$)22,134Ranked 55th▲ 9· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$)1.31MRanked 44th▲ 13· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$)21.86MRanked 84th▲ 11· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$)43,333Ranked 80th▲ 1· 2020
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$)17.23MRanked 65th▼ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$)126.91MRanked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Greece (current US$)22,630Ranked 15th▲ 10· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Hungary (current US$)2.5MRanked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$)12,426Ranked 84th▲ 1· 2020
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$)19.01MRanked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$)4.17MRanked 91st▲ 43· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)2.82MRanked 61st▲ 10· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Luxembourg (current US$)16,693Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)327,997Ranked 49th▲ 8· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)350,000Ranked 43rd▲ 12· 2005
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$)1.58MRanked 61st▲ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland (current US$)2.39MRanked 11th▲ 6· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal (current US$)10,435Ranked 56th▲ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Slovak Republic (current US$)32,439Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Slovenia (current US$)10,000Ranked 19th▲ 8· 2012
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$)59,368Ranked 73rd▲ 59· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$)59,955Ranked 113th▲ 21· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)1.27MRanked 80th▲ 6· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$)217.06MRanked 81st▲ 13· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$)166,563Ranked 95th▼ 5· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)1.39MRanked 114th▲ 14· 2019
- Number of victims of intentional homicide, by sex (number)1,936Ranked 90th▼ 6· 2014
- Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population, by sex (victims per 100,000 population)2.4Ranked 47th▼ 10· 2014
- Openness of executive recruitment4Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Participatory component index0.1Ranked 137th▼ 10· 2025
- Participatory democracy index0.04Ranked 149th▼ 5· 2025
- Participatory political institutions0.1Ranked 135th▼ 10· 2025
- Personal autonomy and individual rights (G)4Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Physical violence index0.24Ranked 136th▲ 7· 2025
- Physical violence index0.24Ranked 135th▲ 7· 2025
- Plans fully funded1Ranked 1st· 2019
- Political civil liberties index0.16Ranked 127th▼ 2· 2025
- Political civil liberties index0.16Ranked 125th▼ 3· 2025
- Political corruption index0.77Ranked 122nd▼ 7· 2025
- Political Corruption Index0.77Ranked 40th▲ 3· 2025
- Political Corruption Index0.77Ranked 40th▲ 3· 2025
- Political liberties0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political opposition1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Political Participation Index2.3Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2025
- Political pluralism and participation (B)2Ranked 15th—· 2024
- Political polarization score1.1Ranked 55th▲ 3· 2025
- Political regime2Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Political regime1Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Political regime1Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Political regime1Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political regime1Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Political regime0Ranked 3rd—· 2018
- Political regime0Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Political regime1Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Political regime (LIED+)2Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Political regime (trichotomous)1Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Political rights aggregate score4Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2024
- Political rights rating7Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Political rights rating (1-7)7Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Political rights score4Ranked 36th—· 2025
- Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.6Ranked 183rd▲ 3· 2024
- Political Stability - Governance score (0-100)38.9Ranked 183rd▲ 3· 2024
- Presidentialism index0.83Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2025
- Press Freedom Index72.7Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2021
- Prevalence of hypertension in men aged 30–79 years, age-standardized26.6Ranked 129th▼ 2· 2019
- Prevalence of hypertension in women aged 30–79 years, age-standardized25.8Ranked 120th▲ 2· 2019
- Private civil liberties index0.35Ranked 129th▲ 1· 2025
- Private civil liberties index0.35Ranked 127th—· 2025
- Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of local government (%)5.1%Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2022
- Proportion of population who believe decision-making is inclusive (%)65.5Ranked 6th· 2020
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of healthcare services (%)48Ranked 51st▲ 18· 2023
- Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%)4.9%Ranked 163rd▲ 1· 2025
- Public sector corruption index0.66Ranked 103rd—· 2025
- Public Sector Corruption Index0.66Ranked 62nd▲ 4· 2025
- Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral0.1Ranked 173rd▲ 2· 2026
- Recent electoral turnover0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Regime0Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Regulation of political participation4Ranked 2nd—· 2018
- Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.5Ranked 191st▼ 1· 2024
- Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)31Ranked 191st▼ 1· 2024
- Respect for counterarguments-0.22Ranked 126th▲ 14· 2025
- Rigorous and impartial public administration-0.57Ranked 121st▲ 6· 2025
- Rule of law (F)2Ranked 15th—· 2024
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.2Ranked 183rd▲ 3· 2024
- Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100)35.7Ranked 183rd▲ 3· 2024
- Rule of law index0.21Ranked 124th▼ 7· 2025
- Rule of Law Index1.8Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2025
- Science helps a lot32.6%Ranked 51st· 2020
- Separation of powers2Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Share of deaths that are registered98.1%Ranked 105th▲ 5· 2019
- Share of population in poverty ($10 a day)48.8%Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Share of women in ministerial positions10%Ranked 72nd▼ 20· 2024
- Share of women in parliament4.9%Ranked 131st▲ 5· 2025
- Share - Question: mh3b - How much science helps to treat anxiety or depression - Answer: A lot - Gender: all - Age group: all32.6%Ranked 51st· 2020
- Share - Question: mh4b - Important for national government to fund research on anxiety/depression - Answer: Extremely important - Gender: all - Age group: all72%Ranked 13th· 2020
- Share - Question: mh5 - Someone local comfortable speaking about anxiety/depression with someone they know - Answer: Not at all comfortable - Gender: all - Age group: all14.4%Ranked 97th· 2020
- Share - Question: mh6 - Friends/family have been anxious/depressed - Answer: Yes - Gender: all - Age group: all41.6%Ranked 44th· 2020
- Share reporting lifetime anxiety or depression26%Ranked 36th· 2020
- Share who spoke to friends or family79.1%Ranked 60th· 2020
- Sovereign state1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Sovereign state1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Spouses have equal rights to manage their own and joint assets1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Stability of Democratic Institutions Index2Ranked 16th—· 2025
- State Capacity Index0.5Ranked 80th▼ 2· 2015
- Stateness Index5.3Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2025
- Statistical agency operating1Ranked 1st—· 2015
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100)63.5Ranked 120th▲ 2· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100)63.5Ranked 120th▲ 2· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)66.6Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100)62.8Ranked 128th▲ 23· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)68.3Ranked 124th▼ 8· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)69.9Ranked 60th—· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)50Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2024
- Talked to friends or family79.1%Ranked 60th· 2020
- Territory under state control86.8%Ranked 76th▼ 13· 2025
- Took prescribed medication45.5%Ranked 56th· 2020
- Total democracy score10Ranked 72nd▼ 5· 2025
- Transparent laws with predictable enforcement0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Universal right to vote2Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Universal right to vote for men1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Universal right to vote for women1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Universal right to vote in practice0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population (%)25.1Ranked 56th· 2014
- VAP turnout, parliamentary38.8%Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2024
- VAP turnout, presidential38.3%Ranked 28th▲ 10· 2024
- V-Dem v2x_api0.32Ranked 135th▼ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2xca_academ0.06Ranked 152nd▲ 14· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_acjst0.31Ranked 123rd▲ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_disc0.29Ranked 124th—· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_dmove0.38Ranked 129th▲ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_prpty0.69Ranked 88th▼ 11· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_slave0.68Ranked 85th▼ 5· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_cspart0.15Ranked 139th▼ 7· 2025
- V-Dem v2xdl_delib0.28Ranked 127th▲ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_EDcomp_thick0.24Ranked 127th▼ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_cent0.77Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_con0.1Ranked 137th▼ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_ctag0.93Ranked 6th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_dmcon0.1Ranked 137th▲ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_inco0.87Ranked 13th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_inpt0.89Ranked 3rd—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_poed0.9Ranked 4th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_ptcon0.74Ranked 29th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ptcon0.63Ranked 47th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_inpt0.89Ranked 8th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_cent0.85Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_ctag0.88Ranked 12th▼ 7· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_inco0.85Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2021
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqaccess0.36Ranked 123rd▼ 12· 2025
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqdr0.56Ranked 83rd—· 2025
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqprotec0.56Ranked 98th▼ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2xel_locelec0.08Ranked 120th▼ 6· 2025
- V-Dem v2xel_regelec0.02Ranked 113th—· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_freexp0.21Ranked 134th▼ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2xme_altinf0.13Ranked 137th▲ 18· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_mpi0Ranked 123rd▼ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_client0.38Ranked 53rd▼ 16· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_pres0.83Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_regcorr0.72Ranked 123rd▲ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlecon0.55Ranked 103rd▲ 5· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlgender0.87Ranked 152nd▼ 2· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlgeo0.46Ranked 93rd▼ 2· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlpol0.87Ranked 143rd▲ 1· 2023
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlsocgr0.79Ranked 143rd▼ 3· 2023
- V-Dem v2xps_party0.34Ranked 120th▼ 4· 2025
- Vertical accountability index-0.09Ranked 134th▲ 6· 2025
- Very comfortable28.9%Ranked 27th· 2020
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.5Ranked 185th▼ 3· 2024
- Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)29.7Ranked 185th▼ 3· 2024
- Voter turnout of registered voters40.6%Ranked 54th▲ 14· 2024
- Voter turnout, parliamentary40.6%Ranked 45th▲ 3· 2024
- Voter turnout, presidential39.9%Ranked 30th▲ 13· 2024
- Women and men have the same rights to own property1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women civil liberties index0.34Ranked 137th▲ 10· 2025
- Women civil society participation index0.29Ranked 142nd▼ 1· 2025
- Women have the same rights to remarry as men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Women in lower/single house (%)4.9%Ranked 135th▼ 3· 2026
- Women in lower/single house (count)14Ranked 81st▼ 6· 2026
- Women political empowerment index0.32Ranked 144th▲ 2· 2025
- Women political participation index0.31Ranked 112th▲ 1· 2025
- Women's civil rights index0.34Ranked 135th▲ 10· 2025
- Women's civil society participation index0.29Ranked 141st▼ 1· 2025
- Women's political empowerment index0.32Ranked 142nd▲ 2· 2025
- Women's political empowerment index0.32Ranked 142nd▲ 2· 2025
- Women's political participation index0.31Ranked 112th▲ 2· 2025
Economy
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2090Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2090UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2090
GDP
- GDP362.68BRanked 43rd▲ 10· 2025
- GDP per capita, PPP16,833.8Ranked 96th▼ 4· 2025
- GDP growth-2.8%Ranked 185th▲ 98· 2025
- Inflation42.2%Ranked 165th▼ 3· 2025
- Unemployment8.3%Ranked 132nd▲ 2· 2025
- Trade openness60.2%Ranked 92nd▼ 34· 2025
- FDI net inflows0.3%Ranked 166th▼ 2· 2024
- Tax revenue7.4%Ranked 119th▲ 4· 2009
- Current account balance11.4%Ranked 9th▼ 7· 2000
- Gross savings37.9%Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2000
- Gross capital formation41.8%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2025
- Government expenditure19.6%Ranked 84th—· 2009
- External debt stocks2.2%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Personal remittances received0.55%Ranked 112th▲ 15· 2004
- R&D expenditure0.73%Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2021
- Researchers in R&D2,239.7Ranked 38th▼ 9· 2021
- High-technology exports0.81%Ranked 139th▼ 7· 2022
- Youth unemployment21.9%Ranked 145th▲ 4· 2025
- Agricultural employment13.6%Ranked 96th—· 2025
- Vulnerable employment39.5%Ranked 120th▲ 1· 2025
- Agriculture value added10.6%Ranked 54th▼ 10· 2025
- Industry value added39.6%Ranked 15th▼ 12· 2025
- GDP per capita (nominal)3,924.4Ranked 130th▲ 4· 2025
- Annual working hours per worker2,246.1Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- GNI per capita (PPP)16,095.8Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2023
- 2.4Ranked 107th▼ 2· 2023
- 10.4.1 - Labour share of GDP (%) - SL_EMP_GTOTL39.8%Ranked 116th▲ 3· 2020
- 10.b.1 - Total assistance for development, by recipient countries (millions of current United States dollars) - DC_TRF_TOTL457.67MRanked 87th▲ 18· 2021
- 8.2.1 - Annual growth rate of real GDP per employed person (%) - SL_EMP_PCAP3%Ranked 43rd▲ 15· 2024
- 9.2.2 - Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment - 13th ICLS (%) - SL_TLF_MANF17.8%Ranked 16th▼ 4· 2023
- Adequacy of social protection and labor programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)25.8Ranked 15th▼ 18· 2020
- Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)25.8Ranked 4th▼ 18· 2020
- Adjusted net national income (annual % growth)14.6Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2021
- Adjusted net national income (constant 2015 US$)310.97BRanked 27th▼ 6· 2021
- Adjusted net national income (current US$)263.72BRanked 36th▼ 8· 2021
- Adjusted net national income per capita (annual % growth)13.7Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2021
- Adjusted net national income per capita (constant 2015 US$)3,515.6Ranked 79th▼ 9· 2021
- Adjusted net national income per capita (current US$)2,981.3Ranked 107th▼ 14· 2021
- Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)11.57BRanked 93rd▲ 1· 2000
- Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (% of GNI)10.5Ranked 78th▼ 4· 2000
- Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (current US$)10.42BRanked 91st▲ 2· 2000
- Adjusted net savings, including particulate emission damage (% of GNI)9.5Ranked 73rd▼ 7· 2000
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)31.12BRanked 6th—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)8.6Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$)73.02BRanked 29th▼ 7· 2021
- Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (% of GNI)20.2Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2021
- Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$)12.01BRanked 38th▼ 9· 2021
- Adjusted savings: education expenditure (% of GNI)3.3Ranked 125th▲ 1· 2021
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$)18.09BRanked 15th▲ 1· 2021
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion (% of GNI)5Ranked 23rd▲ 4· 2021
- Adjusted savings: gross savings (% of GNI)37.9Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2000
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)6.08BRanked 15th▼ 1· 2021
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI)1.7Ranked 31st▲ 5· 2021
- Adjusted savings: natural resources depletion (% of GNI)6.7Ranked 39th▲ 3· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (current US$)0Ranked 112th—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net forest depletion (% of GNI)0Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$)24.91BRanked 23rd▲ 4· 2000
- Adjusted savings: net national savings (% of GNI)22.7Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2000
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (current US$)1.29BRanked 144th▼ 4· 2021
- Adjusted savings: particulate emission damage (% of GNI)0.36Ranked 87th▼ 5· 2021
- Affordability of cigarettes (as a share of GDP per capita)2.2%Ranked 127th▲ 29· 2022
- After tax0.36%Ranked 5th· 2021
- Age 15-2421.3%Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2024
- Age 65+54,717Ranked 87th▼ 1· 2024
- Aged 15-2422.7%Ranked 173rd▼ 2· 2024
- Aged 15-249.3%Ranked 175th▼ 4· 2024
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)-5.6Ranked 155th▲ 89· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)47.44BRanked 11th▲ 1· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)7710.44TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)28,533.93TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)38.42BRanked 24th▲ 11· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)12,862.9Ranked 55th▼ 6· 2025
- AHDI excluding income0.31Ranked 92nd▼ 5· 2020
- Aid from governments275.86MRanked 83rd▼ 6· 2024
- Aid received as grants279.49MRanked 78th▼ 5· 2024
- Air transport, freight (million ton-km)136.93MRanked 56th▲ 8· 2023
- Air transport, freight (million ton-km)136.9Ranked 56th▲ 8· 2023
- Air transport, passengers carried18.07MRanked 38th▲ 6· 2023
- Air transport, passengers carried18.07MRanked 38th▲ 6· 2023
- Air transport, passengers carried18.07MRanked 38th▲ 6· 2023
- Air transport, registered carrier departures worldwide144,976Ranked 39th▲ 5· 2023
- Air travel trips per capita0.21Ranked 97th—· 2019
- Alcohol and tobacco as share of total consumer expenditure0.54%Ranked 95th▼ 3· 2023
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), End-of-period (EoP)2,805.2Ranked 9th—· 2031
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), End-of-period (EoP), percent change25Ranked 1st—· 2031
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), Period average2,600.4Ranked 10th—· 2031
- All Items, Consumer price index (CPI), Period average, percent change25Ranked 1st—· 2031
- Amount of tracked exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)4.12BRanked 39th▼ 3· 2022
- Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)3.37BRanked 49th▼ 3· 2022
- Amount of United States dollars committed to public-private partnerships for infrastructure, million USD nominal0Ranked 44th▼ 18· 2020
- Amount of United States dollars committed to public-private partnerships for infrastructure, million USD real0Ranked 62nd▲ 14· 2019
- Amount of United States dollars committed to public-private partnerships for infrastructure, million USD real0Ranked 61st▲ 14· 2019
- Annual broad money growth (%)28%Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2016
- Annual broad money growth (%)28Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2016
- Annual economic damages as a share of GDP from droughts0%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Annual GDP growth (%)3.7Ranked 82nd▲ 40· 2024
- Annual GDP growth (%)5%Ranked 42nd▼ 61· 2023
- Annual growth of exports of goods and services (%)6Ranked 48th▲ 23· 2024
- Annual growth of households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (%)3.5Ranked 68th▼ 44· 2024
- Annual growth of imports of goods and services (%)2.7Ranked 90th▲ 26· 2024
- Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%)3.8Ranked 50th▼ 72· 2024
- Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%)-1.7%Ranked 112th▼ 19· 2023
- Annual growth of the gross capital formation (%)2.6Ranked 82nd▲ 26· 2024
- Annual growth of the gross capital formation (%)1.2%Ranked 105th▲ 3· 2022
- Annual growth rate of real GDP per capita (%)2.6Ranked 40th▲ 12· 2024
- Annual inflation, consumer prices (%)32.5Ranked 165th▼ 6· 2024
- Annual rate of deaths from all disasters excluding extreme temperatures0.05Ranked 32nd▲ 24· 2024
- Annual rate of people affected by all disasters excluding extreme temperatures333Ranked 62nd▲ 9· 2024
- Annual working hours per worker2,246.1Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Arrivals of same-day visitors from abroad107,000Ranked 42nd· 2021
- Arrivals of same-day visitors from abroad per 1,000 people1.2Ranked 65th· 2021
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad882,000Ranked 58th· 2021
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad for business purposes16,100Ranked 121st· 2016
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes4.93MRanked 36th· 2016
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes4.93MRanked 36th· 2016
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad per 1,000 people10Ranked 127th· 2021
- Augmented Human Development Index (AHDI)0.37Ranked 92nd▼ 4· 2020
- Automated teller machines (ATMs) (per 100,000 adults)83.6Ranked 33rd▼ 6· 2018
- Automated teller machines (ATMs) (per 100,000 adults)83.6Ranked 33rd▼ 6· 2018
- Average farm size4.1Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2000
- Average length of stay in hotels and similar establishments2Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2003
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by economic activity and occupation46.8Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by ILO sector and sex46.8Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex46.8Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and economic activity46.8Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 246.8Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and establishment size46.8Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and occupation46.8Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and occupation - ISCO level 246.8Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and public/private sector46.8Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and education46.8Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and establishment size46.8Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and marital status46.8Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and public/private sector46.8Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, establishment size and marital status46.8Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202546Ranked 14th—· 2027
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and education46.8Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and establishment size46.8Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and marital status46.8Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and public/private sector46.8Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, public/private sector and marital status46.8Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by economic activity and occupation46.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex46.6Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and citizenship46.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and economic activity46.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 246.6Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and education46.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and establishment size46.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and marital status46.6Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and occupation46.6Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and occupation - ISCO level 246.6Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and public/private sector46.6Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and education46.6Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and establishment size46.6Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and marital status46.6Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and public/private sector46.6Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, establishment size and marital status46.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and education46.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and establishment size46.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and marital status46.6Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and public/private sector46.6Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, public/private sector and marital status46.6Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in a STEM occupation46.8Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in care employment by sex35.4Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in the public sector41.3Ranked 19th▲ 11· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in tourism sector employment51.8Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in care employment by sex35.5Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in in a STEM occupation46.3Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in the public sector41.3Ranked 20th▲ 12· 2024
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in tourism sector employment49.2Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2022
- Average weekly hours usually worked per employed person by sex47.5Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Average weekly hours usually worked per employee by sex47.7Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2024
- Average working hours per worker2,246.1Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Benefit incidence of social protection and labor programs to poorest quintile (% of total SPL benefits)19.4Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits)19.4Ranked 16th▼ 8· 2020
- Borrowed from family or friends39.8%Ranked 20th▲ 17· 2021
- Borrowed to start, operate, or expand a farm or business, female (% age 15+)15.2%Ranked 8th▼ 38· 2017
- Broad money (current LCU)11,888.8TRanked 1st—· 2016
- Broad money growth (annual %)28Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2016
- Broad money (% of GDP)79.1Ranked 38th▼ 3· 2016
- Broad money to total reserves ratio9.1Ranked 29th▲ 19· 1982
- Caloric supply2,875.2Ranked 105th▼ 2· 2023
- Carbon intensity220.8Ranked 76th▲ 2· 2024
- Care employees by sex and public/private sector (thousands)2,191.1Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2024
- Care employment by sex and citizenship (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2024
- Care employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2024
- Care employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2024
- Care employment by sex and education (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Care employment by sex and marital status (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2024
- Care employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2024
- Care employment by sex and occupation (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2024
- Care employment by sex and place of birth (thousands)1,995.3Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2011
- Care employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2024
- Care employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 14th▼ 3· 2024
- Care employment by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)2,347.5Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Cash surplus/deficit as a proportion of GDP (%)0.45Ranked 1st—· 2009
- ccon697,634.2Ranked 27th—· 2019
- cda1.04MRanked 23rd▼ 1· 2019
- cgdpe1.08MRanked 23rd▲ 1· 2019
- cgdpo1.09MRanked 24th▲ 2· 2019
- Changes in inventories (constant LCU)9232.77TRanked 1st—· 2024
- Changes in inventories (current LCU)34,944.32TRanked 1st—· 2024
- Changes in inventories (current US$)77.16BRanked 3rd—· 2024
- Chemicals (% of value added in manufacturing)25.2Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2022
- ck0.04Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2019
- Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money)5.7Ranked 50th▲ 10· 2016
- Claims on central government, etc. (% GDP)8.2Ranked 78th▼ 6· 2016
- Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money)20.1Ranked 4th▼ 33· 2016
- cn6.5MRanked 19th▲ 1· 2019
- Coal consumption per capita0.2Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2024
- Coal rents (% of GDP)0.01Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2021
- Coefficient of variation in calorie consumption0.27Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2020
- Commercial bank branches (per 100,000 adults)29.3Ranked 29th▼ 7· 2018
- Commercial bank branches (per 100,000 adults)29.3Ranked 29th▼ 7· 2018
- Commercial banks and other lending (PPG + PNG) (NFL, current US$)-20.97MRanked 50th▲ 7· 2024
- Communications, computer, etc. (% of service exports, BoP)4.7Ranked 138th▲ 57· 2000
- Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP)32.1Ranked 67th▼ 28· 2000
- Compensation of employees (current LCU)321.02TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Compensation of employees (% of expense)39.8Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2009
- Compensation of employees (% of expense)39.8%Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2009
- Consumer price index (2010 = 100)4,030.3Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2025
- Consumer price index (2010 = 100)4,030.3Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2025
- Consumer prices, all items (annual average % change)42.2%Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2025
- Container port traffic (TEU: 20 foot equivalent units)2.92MRanked 45th—· 2024
- Contraceptive prevalence57%Ranked 11th▲ 7· 2010
- Contributing family workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)12.1Ranked 54th—· 2025
- Contributing family workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)1.6Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2025
- Contributing family workers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)3.2Ranked 88th—· 2025
- cor_exp0.35Ranked 142nd▲ 2· 2017
- Countries that have conducted at least one population and housing census in the last 10 years (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2016
- Countries with birth registration data that are at least 90 percent complete (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Countries with death registration data that are at least 75 percent complete (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans that are fully funded (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2019
- Countries with national statistical plans that are under implementation (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Countries with national statistical plans with funding from Government (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2019
- Criminal sanctions or compensation for sexual harassment in employment0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- csh_c0.44Ranked 157th▼ 2· 2019
- csh_g0.2Ranked 86th▼ 4· 2019
- csh_i0.32Ranked 24th—· 2019
- csh_m-0.04Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2019
- csh_r-0.01Ranked 139th▼ 15· 2019
- csh_x0.09Ranked 137th▲ 30· 2019
- Current account balance as a proportion of GDP (%)11.4Ranked 9th· 2000
- Current account balance as a proportion of GDP (%)11.4%Ranked 9th· 2000
- Current account balance (BoP, current US$)12.48BRanked 10th▼ 6· 2000
- Current account balance (credit less debit), Percent of GDP2.7Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2031
- Current account balance (credit less debit), US dollar9.83BRanked 28th▼ 2· 2031
- Customs and other import duties (current LCU)62.55TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Customs and other import duties (% of tax revenue)20.7Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2009
- cwtfp0.73Ranked 43rd▼ 2· 2019
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from animal products24.8Ranked 133rd▼ 5· 2023
- Daily protein supply per person79.6Ranked 116th▲ 1· 2023
- Data Infrastructure performance index (Statistical Performance Indicators Pillar 5) (Index)50Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2024
- Data Sources performance index (Statistical Performance Indicators Pillar 4) (Index)69.9Ranked 60th—· 2024
- Debt service as a proportion of exports of goods, services and primary income (%)0.3Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Debt service as a proportion of exports of goods, services and primary income (%)0.3%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Debt service on external debt, public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) (TDS, current US$)76.47MRanked 23rd▼ 4· 2024
- Debt service on external debt, total (TDS, current US$)362.02MRanked 35th▼ 5· 2024
- Debt service (PPG and IMF only, % of exports of goods, services and primary income)9.2Ranked 40th▼ 28· 2000
- DEC alternative conversion factor (in local currency unit per United States dollar)452,865Ranked 1st—· 2024
- DEC alternative conversion factor (LCU per US$)742,603.7Ranked 1st—· 2025
- delta0.04Ranked 126th▲ 7· 2019
- Deposit interest rate (%)12.8Ranked 10th▲ 7· 2016
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise exports (%)0.46Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise imports (%)0.28Ranked 51st▼ 1· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services exports (%)0.15Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services imports (%)0.27Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2024
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters relative to GDP (%)0%Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2011
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU)-17.06BRanked 79th▲ 78· 2025
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU)60.34BRanked 12th▲ 11· 2025
- Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen statistical capacity in developing countries (current United States dollars)175,261Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic credit to private sector by banks (% of GDP)57.8Ranked 55th▼ 2· 2016
- Domestic credit to private sector (% of GDP)57.8Ranked 59th▼ 2· 2016
- Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2015 United States dollars) - Total or no breakdown1.7Ranked 82nd▼ 7· 2023
- Economic Complexity rank89Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2013
- emp24.6Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2019
- Employed foreign citizens by sex and country of citizenship (thousands)567.5Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2018
- Employed persons in the tourism industries (number)1.44MRanked 22nd▲ 2· 2022
- Employees56.8%Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by economic activity and occupation (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2024
- Employees by sex and economic activity (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex and education (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex and establishment size (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex and marital status (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex and multiple-job holding (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex and occupation (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex and public/private sector (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex, economic activity and establishment size (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex, education and marital status (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex, establishment size and marital status (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex, occupation and education (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex, occupation and establishment size (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2024
- Employees by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex, occupation and public/private sector (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)13,916.1Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employees in STEM occupations by sex and public/private sector (thousands)1,224.6Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2024
- Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)1.4Ranked 119th▼ 1· 2025
- Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)3.8Ranked 106th—· 2025
- Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)3.4Ranked 89th—· 2025
- Employment by economic activity and occupation (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and citizenship (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and institutional sector (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and occupation (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and place of birth (thousands)20,220.5Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2011
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and status in employment (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by ILO sector and sex (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by ILO sector, sex and establishment size (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex and care worker type (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex and economic activity -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)27,071.2Ranked 24th—· 2025
- Employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex and establishment size (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex and multiple-job holding (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex and occupation -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)27,071.2Ranked 24th—· 2025
- Employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex and occupation (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Employment by sex and public/private sector (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex and status in employment -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)27,071.2Ranked 24th—· 2025
- Employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, economic activity and citizenship (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, economic activity and establishment size (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, economic activity and multiple job holding (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, economic activity and place of birth (thousands)20,220.5Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2011
- Employment by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and citizenship (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and economic activity (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and status in employment (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and citizenship (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and economic activity (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and status in employment (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, education and citizenship (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, education and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, establishment size and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, establishment size and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, multiple job holding and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, multiple job holding and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, occupation and citizenship (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, occupation and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, occupation and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, occupation and establishment size (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, occupation and multiple job holding (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, occupation and place of birth (thousands)20,220.5Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2011
- Employment by sex, occupation and public/private sector (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and citizenship (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and economic activity (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and establishment size (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and multiple job holding (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and occupation (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment by sex, status in employment and place of birth (thousands)20,220.5Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2011
- Employment by sex, status in employment and public/private sector (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment by sex, weekly hours actually worked and education (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Employment by sex, weekly hours actually worked and marital status (thousands)24,567.8Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Employment discrimination based on gender prohibited0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Employment in agriculture, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)12.7Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2025
- Employment in agriculture, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)13.8Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2025
- Employment in industry34.7%Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Employment in industry, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)25.3Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2025
- Employment in industry, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)36.4Ranked 24th—· 2025
- Employment in industry (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)34.7Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Employment in services, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)62Ranked 111th—· 2025
- Employment in services, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)49.8Ranked 101st—· 2025
- Employment in services (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)51.7Ranked 118th▲ 1· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and citizenship (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and economic activity (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and education (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and marital status (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and occupation (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and place of birth (thousands)854.2Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2011
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and status in employment (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2024
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)1,432.3Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2024
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)11.8Ranked 175th▼ 2· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (national estimate)12.1Ranked 104th▼ 7· 2024
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)62.7Ranked 115th—· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (national estimate)63.2Ranked 71st▼ 4· 2024
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)37.6Ranked 169th▲ 1· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%) (national estimate)37.6Ranked 99th▼ 6· 2024
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)6.3Ranked 174th—· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (national estimate)6.5Ranked 102nd▼ 8· 2024
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)28.3Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (national estimate)29.5Ranked 83rd▼ 5· 2024
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)17.6Ranked 168th—· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, total (%) (national estimate)18.5Ranked 98th▼ 9· 2024
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex and education (%)37.6Ranked 95th▼ 6· 2024
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex and marital status (%)37.6Ranked 64th▼ 8· 2024
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex, education and citizenship (%)37.6Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2024
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex, education and marital status (%)37.6Ranked 63rd▼ 6· 2024
- Employment-to-population ratio for persons ages 25 to 54 by sex, household type and presence of children (%)49.2Ranked 29th▼ 21· 2024
- Estimated funding raised by privately held AI companies - Field: All0Ranked 64th▲ 10· 2022
- Estimated maternal deaths273.7Ranked 119th▼ 1· 2020
- Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment, as a distinct strategy or as part of a national employment strategy1Ranked 3rd· 2025
- Expenditure, General government, Domestic currency270,213.45TRanked 1st—· 2031
- Expenditure, General government, Percent of GDP13Ranked 182nd▼ 2· 2031
- Expense (current LCU)806.6TRanked 2nd—· 2009
- Expense (% of GDP)19.6%Ranked 84th—· 2009
- Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU)10,725.76TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (annual % growth)-0.63Ranked 109th▲ 54· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$)29.73BRanked 36th▼ 4· 2000
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)109.89BRanked 37th—· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (constant LCU)20,053.66TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU)69,364.03TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (current US$)93.41BRanked 45th▲ 2· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (% of GDP)25.8Ranked 95th▼ 28· 2025
- Exports of goods and services, Volume, Free on board (FOB), Percent change4.8Ranked 33rd▼ 9· 2031
- Exports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$)30.13BRanked 40th—· 2000
- Exports of goods, Volume, Free on board (FOB), Percent change5Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2031
- External balance on goods and services (constant LCU)5690.56TRanked 1st—· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU)-23,522.86TRanked 138th▼ 34· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (current US$)-31.68BRanked 133rd▼ 29· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (% of GDP)-8.7Ranked 99th▼ 3· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (% of GDP)-8.7%Ranked 99th▼ 3· 2025
- External debt stocks as a proportion of GNI (%)2.5%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- External debt stocks as a proportion of GNI (%)2.2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- External debt stocks, long-term (DOD, current US$)1.05BRanked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- External debt stocks, private nonguaranteed (PNG) (DOD, current US$)727.36MRanked 25th—· 2024
- External debt stocks, public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) (DOD, current US$)323.49MRanked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- External debt stocks, short-term (DOD, current US$)2.28BRanked 69th▼ 2· 2024
- External debt stocks, total (DOD, current US$)9.65BRanked 49th▼ 1· 2024
- Family or friends39.8%Ranked 20th▲ 17· 2021
- Female labor force participation rate14.1%Ranked 90th▼ 18· 2024
- Female labor force participation rate14%Ranked 177th—· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate14%Ranked 176th—· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate14%Ranked 177th—· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate, ages 15-249.3%Ranked 103rd▼ 7· 2024
- Female labor force participation rate in 198014.1%Ranked 102nd▼ 8· 2024
- Female share of employment in senior and middle management (%) 21.4Ranked 82nd▼ 5· 2024
- Female unemployment rate15.6%Ranked 161st—· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)-0.47Ranked 127th▲ 48· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)304.26BRanked 33rd▼ 1· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)42,653.45TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)180,345.9TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (current US$)242.86BRanked 44th▲ 4· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)67Ranked 112th▼ 48· 2025
- Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU)138.37TRanked 1st—· 2010
- Food, beverages and tobacco (% of value added in manufacturing)11.5Ranked 81st▼ 10· 2022
- Foreign aid received275.86MRanked 83rd▼ 6· 2024
- Foreign aid received per capita3Ranked 126th▼ 4· 2024
- Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows (millions of United States dollars)1,449.1Ranked 89th▼ 2· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net (BoP, current US$)-39MRanked 40th▲ 3· 2000
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows, as a proportion of GDP (%)0.3Ranked 162nd▼ 4· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$)1.45BRanked 88th▲ 6· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP)0.3%Ranked 164th▼ 2· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$)89.42MRanked 90th▲ 3· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP)0.02%Ranked 133rd▲ 6· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP)0.02Ranked 134th▲ 6· 2024
- Foreign guests staying in hotels and similar establishments313,000Ranked 64th▲ 1· 2003
- Forest rents (% of GDP)0.01Ranked 154th▲ 1· 2021
- GDP1.34TRanked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- GDP (constant 2015 US$)519.15BRanked 27th▲ 2· 2025
- GDP (constant LCU)78,546.42TRanked 1st—· 2025
- GDP (current LCU)269,329.09TRanked 1st—· 2025
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country)342.9Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2025
- GDP deflator: linked series (base year varies by country)342.9Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2025
- GDP (Fouquin and Hugot (CEPII 2016))258.48BRanked 29th▲ 2· 2014
- GDP growth observations-1.5%Ranked 82nd▲ 10· 2025
- GDP: linked series (current LCU)269,329.09TRanked 1st—· 2025
- GDP per capita5,617.4Ranked 102nd▼ 8· 2025
- GDP per capita18,473.1Ranked 63rd—· 2022
- GDP per capita17,484.1Ranked 98th▼ 3· 2024
- GDP per capita14,809Ranked 99th▲ 3· 2023
- GDP per capita5,986.6Ranked 81st—· 2020
- GDP per capita17,484.1Ranked 98th▼ 3· 2024
- GDP per capita5,617.4Ranked 102nd▼ 8· 2025
- GDP per capita17,484.1Ranked 98th▼ 3· 2024
- GDP per capita (2011 int-$)17,687Ranked 60th▲ 10· 2017
- GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$)5,617.4Ranked 103rd▼ 7· 2025
- GDP per capita (constant LCU)849.91MRanked 1st—· 2025
- GDP per capita (current LCU)2.91BRanked 1st—· 2025
- GDP per capita growth (annual %)-3.7Ranked 183rd▲ 98· 2025
- GDP per capita growth (annual %)-3.7%Ranked 175th▲ 93· 2025
- GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)19,699.2Ranked 96th▼ 4· 2025
- GDP per person employed (constant 2021 PPP $)57,467.8Ranked 69th▲ 3· 2025
- GDP per person employed (constant 2021 PPP $)59,472.1Ranked 66th▼ 3· 2024
- GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $)1.56TRanked 24th▲ 2· 2025
- GDP, PPP (current international $)1.82TRanked 24th▲ 2· 2025
- GDP price levels relative to the US0.26Ranked 175th▼ 5· 2024
- Gender Development Index0.88Ranked 94th▼ 5· 2023
- General government final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)-0.69Ranked 114th▲ 52· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)68.4BRanked 29th▼ 1· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)10,151.47TRanked 1st—· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU)35,797.59TRanked 1st—· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$)48.21BRanked 44th▲ 6· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)13.3Ranked 88th▼ 28· 2025
- Gini coefficient0.36Ranked 34th▼ 6· 2023
- Gini coefficient54Ranked 32nd▼ 7· 2022
- Gini coefficient after tax0.51Ranked 37th▼ 5· 2022
- Gini coefficient (before tax)0.54Ranked 32nd▼ 7· 2022
- Global Hunger Index7.7Ranked 67th▼ 11· 2021
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$)429.44BRanked 37th▲ 5· 2025
- GNI (constant 2015 US$)458.02BRanked 22nd▼ 3· 2024
- GNI (constant LCU)74,323.19TRanked 1st—· 2024
- GNI (current LCU)268,740.22TRanked 1st—· 2025
- GNI (current US$)361.89BRanked 42nd▲ 11· 2025
- GNI growth (annual %)-8.9Ranked 104th▼ 33· 2025
- GNI: linked series (current LCU)268,740.22TRanked 1st—· 2025
- GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$)4,650Ranked 116th▼ 4· 2025
- GNI per capita (constant 2015 US$)5,001.9Ranked 84th▼ 2· 2024
- GNI per capita (constant LCU)811.67MRanked 1st—· 2024
- GNI per capita (current LCU)2.91BRanked 1st—· 2025
- GNI per capita growth (annual %)-0.61Ranked 122nd▼ 10· 2024
- GNI per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $)16,076.5Ranked 74th▼ 5· 2024
- GNI per capita, PPP (current international $)19,660Ranked 89th▼ 8· 2025
- GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $)1.47TRanked 19th▼ 1· 2024
- GNI, PPP (current international $)1.82TRanked 24th▲ 3· 2025
- Goods and services expense (current LCU)86.51TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Goods and services expense (% of expense)10.7Ranked 78th▼ 6· 2009
- Goods exports (BoP, current US$)28.35BRanked 33rd▼ 1· 2000
- Goods imports (BoP, current US$)15.21BRanked 41st—· 2000
- Government consumption as a share of GDP29.4%Ranked 19th▼ 4· 2023
- Government consumption as a share of GDP29.4%Ranked 19th▼ 4· 2023
- Government expenditure68.4BRanked 29th▼ 1· 2025
- Government expenditure (% of GDP)14.2%Ranked 143rd▼ 2· 2024
- Government expenditure (% of GDP)14.2%Ranked 143rd▼ 2· 2024
- Government expenditure per student, primary (% of GDP per capita)11.1%Ranked 31st▼ 40· 2017
- Government revenues as a share of GDP31.2%Ranked 61st▼ 5· 2009
- Grants and other revenue (current LCU)545.28TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Grants and other revenue (% of revenue)52.3Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2009
- Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)56.44MRanked 119th▲ 28· 2023
- Gross capital formation (annual % growth)-10.5Ranked 122nd▲ 34· 2025
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$)184.32BRanked 17th▼ 1· 2025
- Gross capital formation (constant LCU)30,202.43TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross capital formation (current LCU)112,505.99TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross capital formation (current US$)151.5BRanked 23rd▲ 2· 2025
- Gross capital formation, Percent of GDP43.7Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2031
- Gross debt, General government, Domestic currency919,689.13TRanked 183rd—· 2031
- Gross debt, General government, Percent of GDP44.1Ranked 74th▲ 5· 2031
- Gross domestic income (constant LCU)69,218.53TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.57TRanked 18th—· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.6TRanked 22nd—· 2024
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.57TRanked 18th—· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.57TRanked 18th—· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)519.15BRanked 27th▲ 2· 2025
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Domestic currency83,046.09TRanked 1st—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Per capita, Domestic currency898.14MRanked 1st—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Per capita, purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmark 202117,789.2Ranked 107th—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Constant prices, Percent change2.1Ranked 129th▼ 5· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Domestic currency2,083,299.66TRanked 1st—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Fiscal year, Domestic currency2,083,299.66TRanked 1st—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Per capita, Domestic currency22.53BRanked 1st—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Per capita, US dollar3,936.1Ranked 141st▲ 2· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmarks 2017-20212.17TRanked 29th▲ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Current prices, US dollar363.95BRanked 51st—· 2031
- Gross Domestic Product, GDP in millions constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 20251.57MRanked 25th—· 2027
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Per capita, purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, ICP benchmarks 2017-202123,478.8Ranked 107th—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Price deflator, Index2,508.6Ranked 8th—· 2031
- Gross domestic product (GDP), Purchasing power parity (PPP) international dollar, percent of world GDP, Percent, ICP benchmarks 2017-20210.76Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2031
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU)88,983.19TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross domestic savings (current US$)119.83BRanked 31st▲ 7· 2025
- Gross domestic savings (% of GDP)33Ranked 22nd▲ 11· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth)-14.4Ranked 122nd▲ 42· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$)91.65BRanked 33rd▲ 6· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU)20,969.66TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU)77,561.67TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (current US$)104.45BRanked 33rd▲ 7· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP)28.8Ranked 15th▼ 14· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$)488.58BRanked 24th▲ 1· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (constant LCU)72,855.88TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU)292,851.89TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (current US$)394.36BRanked 38th▲ 9· 2025
- Gross national expenditure deflator (base year varies by country)402Ranked 7th▼ 15· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (% of GDP)108.7Ranked 37th▼ 41· 2025
- Gross national income (GNI) per capita16,076.5Ranked 74th▼ 5· 2024
- Gross national income (GNI) per capita16,076.5Ranked 74th▼ 5· 2024
- Gross national income per capita16,095.8Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2023
- Gross national income per capita (male)27,375.5Ranked 71st▼ 1· 2023
- Gross national savings, Percent of GDP46.4Ranked 1st—· 2031
- Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance (MPF) - on an experimental basis (millions of United States dollars)0.02Ranked 114th▲ 39· 2019
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official concessional sustainable development loans (millions of United States dollars)0Ranked 110th▼ 11· 2024
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official non-concessional sustainable development loans (millions of United States dollars)19.2Ranked 105th▲ 3· 2024
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants from South-South cooperation providers (millions of United States dollars)0.35Ranked 37th▼ 25· 2022
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants (millions of United States dollars)122.1Ranked 105th▲ 11· 2024
- Gross receipts by developing countries of private grants (millions of United States dollars)0.11Ranked 105th▲ 3· 2024
- Gross savings (current LCU)238.28TRanked 2nd—· 2000
- Gross savings (current US$)41.58BRanked 26th—· 2000
- Gross savings (% of GNI)37.9Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2000
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$)502.83BRanked 23rd▲ 2· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU)76,213.15TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU)262,135.32TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$)352.99BRanked 37th▲ 7· 2025
- Harmonized test scores among all students432.1Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2020
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)-0.4Ranked 125th▲ 46· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)235.92BRanked 31st▼ 1· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)32,501.98TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)144,548.32TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)194.65BRanked 40th▲ 2· 2025
- Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU)144,548.32TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)53.7Ranked 95th▼ 52· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$)2,552.8Ranked 84th▼ 20· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %)-1.3Ranked 123rd▲ 46· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $)7,323.6Ranked 81st▼ 13· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)9,912Ranked 75th▼ 13· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $)676.83BRanked 25th▼ 3· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $)916.05BRanked 24th▼ 2· 2025
- Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1)0.59Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2020
- Human Development Index0.8Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$)124.09MRanked 101st▲ 1· 2024
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$)0Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2024
- IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$)247.55MRanked 28th▲ 6· 2024
- Imports from China as a share of GDP2.8%Ranked 136th▲ 18· 2024
- Imports of goods and services (annual % growth)-13.5Ranked 125th▲ 31· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$)17.5BRanked 42nd—· 2000
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)58.56BRanked 50th▼ 1· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (constant LCU)14,363.1TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (current LCU)92,886.88TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (current US$)125.08BRanked 41st▲ 1· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (% of GDP)34.5Ranked 82nd▼ 45· 2025
- Imports of goods and services, Volume, Cost insurance freight (CIF), Percent change3.1Ranked 100th▲ 12· 2031
- Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$)18.11BRanked 43rd▲ 1· 2000
- Imports of goods, Volume, Cost insurance freight (CIF), Percent change3.1Ranked 93rd▲ 5· 2031
- Inactivity rate by sex and education (%)59.3Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Inactivity rate by sex and marital status (%)59.3Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Inactivity rate by sex, education and citizenship (%)59.3Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2024
- Inactivity rate by sex, education and marital status (%)59.3Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Incidence of part-time employment by sex (%)23.9Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2024
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%4.7Ranked 40th▼ 8· 2023
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%4.7Ranked 42nd▼ 8· 2023
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%4.7Ranked 42nd▼ 8· 2023
- Income share of the richest 1%15.7%Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Income share of the richest 10% after tax43.6%Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2022
- Income share of the richest 1% after tax14.7%Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2022
- Industrial design applications, nonresident, by count113Ranked 68th▼ 8· 2021
- Industrial design applications, resident, by count13,903Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2021
- Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth)-4.8Ranked 155th▲ 64· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)184.3BRanked 18th▼ 1· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU)31,865.47TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU)106,764.27TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$)143.77BRanked 26th▲ 2· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)19,618.5Ranked 72nd▼ 9· 2025
- Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index0.64Ranked 84th▲ 3· 2023
- Inequality in income0.28Ranked 97th—· 2023
- Inflation, consumer prices (annual %)42.2%Ranked 164th▼ 3· 2025
- Inflation, GDP deflator (annual %)28.8Ranked 179th▼ 13· 2025
- Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series (annual %)28.8Ranked 179th▼ 13· 2025
- Insurance and financial services (% of service exports, BoP)10.5Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2000
- Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP)9.3Ranked 24th▼ 7· 2000
- Interest payments (current LCU)5.9TRanked 4th—· 2009
- Interest payments (% of expense)0.73Ranked 114th▲ 8· 2009
- Interest payments (% of expense)0.73%Ranked 114th▲ 8· 2009
- Interest payments (% of revenue)0.57Ranked 116th▲ 5· 2009
- Interest rate spread (lending rate minus deposit rate, %)5.2Ranked 69th▼ 50· 2016
- International migrant stock, total3.84MRanked 17th▼ 5· 2024
- International tourism, expenditures (current US$)9.27BRanked 32nd▲ 8· 2018
- International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)576MRanked 43rd▲ 13· 2018
- International tourism, expenditures for travel items (current US$)8.7BRanked 35th▲ 10· 2018
- International tourism, expenditures (% of total imports)3.8Ranked 105th▲ 11· 2000
- International tourism, number of arrivals1.55MRanked 49th▲ 3· 2020
- International tourism, number of departures1.55MRanked 35th▼ 8· 2020
- International tourism, receipts (current US$)5.25BRanked 51st▼ 1· 2018
- International tourism, receipts for passenger transport items (current US$)228MRanked 65th▲ 8· 2018
- International tourism, receipts for travel items (current US$)5.02BRanked 51st▼ 2· 2018
- International tourism, receipts (% of total exports)2.3Ranked 116th▲ 3· 2000
- International tourist departures2.4MRanked 25th▼ 2· 2021
- International tourist departures per 1,000 people27.2Ranked 70th▲ 14· 2021
- International tourist departures per 1,000 people27.2Ranked 70th▲ 14· 2021
- Investment in ICT with private participation (current US$)370MRanked 4th—· 2008
- Investment in transport with private participation (current US$)235MRanked 13th· 2016
- irr0.09Ranked 76th—· 2019
- Labor force, female (% of total labor force)16.9Ranked 178th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate41%Ranked 170th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate41%Ranked 170th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)15.6Ranked 178th—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+) (national estimate)14.1Ranked 103rd▼ 8· 2024
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)9.3Ranked 177th▲ 2· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (national estimate)9.3Ranked 104th▼ 7· 2024
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)35.1Ranked 142nd▲ 3· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (national estimate)35.8Ranked 79th▼ 6· 2024
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)22.5Ranked 173rd—· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, total (%) (national estimate)23.2Ranked 102nd▼ 7· 2024
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)73.4Ranked 128th▲ 5· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate)67.2Ranked 118th▲ 6· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15+) (national estimate)67.4Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2024
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)45Ranked 169th▲ 1· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate)41Ranked 170th▼ 1· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+) (national estimate)40.7Ranked 102nd▼ 7· 2024
- Labor force, total29.52MRanked 24th—· 2025
- Labor force with advanced education, female (% of female working-age population with advanced education)35.7Ranked 94th▼ 12· 2024
- Labor force with advanced education, male (% of male working-age population with advanced education)71Ranked 91st▼ 6· 2024
- Labor force with advanced education (% of total working-age population with advanced education)54.1Ranked 94th▼ 11· 2024
- Labor force with basic education, female (% of female working-age population with basic education)7.7Ranked 93rd▼ 11· 2024
- Labor force with basic education, male (% of male working-age population with basic education)64.8Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2024
- Labor force with basic education (% of total working-age population with basic education)37.7Ranked 65th▼ 12· 2024
- Labor force with intermediate education, female (% of female working-age population with intermediate education)11.1Ranked 92nd▼ 12· 2024
- Labor force with intermediate education, male (% of male working-age population with intermediate education)76.3Ranked 33rd▼ 9· 2024
- Labor force with intermediate education (% of total working-age population with intermediate education)44.3Ranked 91st▼ 9· 2024
- Labour dependency ratio -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 20252.4Ranked 21st—· 2027
- Labour force by sex and education (thousands)26,597.3Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2024
- Labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)26,597.3Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Labour force by sex, education and citizenship (thousands)26,597.3Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)26,597.3Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Labour force participation rate by sex and education (%)40.7Ranked 98th▼ 7· 2024
- Labour force participation rate by sex and marital status (%)40.7Ranked 67th▼ 8· 2024
- Labour force participation rate by sex, education and citizenship (%)40.7Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2024
- Labour force participation rate by sex, education and marital status (%)40.7Ranked 66th▼ 6· 2024
- Labour force participation rate for persons ages 25 to 54 by sex and household type (%)50.8Ranked 55th▲ 19· 2011
- Labour force participation rate for persons ages 25 to 54 by sex, household type and presence of children (%)51Ranked 29th▼ 23· 2024
- Labour income share as a percent of GDP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)34.9Ranked 157th▼ 1· 2026
- labsh0.36Ranked 122nd—· 2019
- Lead time to export, median case (days)3Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2018
- Lead time to import, median case (days)5Ranked 8th▼ 7· 2018
- Legislation on sexual harassment in employment0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Lending interest rate (%)18Ranked 16th▼ 21· 2016
- Level of national compliance with labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining) based on International Labour Organization (ILO) textual sources and national legislation10Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Liner shipping connectivity index (maximum value in 2004 = 100)31.1Ranked 60th—· 2021
- Listed domestic companies, total630Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2025
- Local guests in hotels and similar establishments25.7MRanked 11th—· 2011
- Local guests in hotels and similar establishments25.7MRanked 11th—· 2011
- Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high)2.4Ranked 21st▼ 45· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high)2.1Ranked 24th▼ 27· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high)2.4Ranked 17th▼ 39· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)2.2Ranked 21st▼ 33· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Frequency with which shipments reach consignee within scheduled or expected time (1=low to 5=high)2.7Ranked 17th▼ 26· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Overall (1=low to 5=high)2.3Ranked 21st▼ 33· 2022
- Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high)2.4Ranked 22nd▼ 28· 2022
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex (%)13.4Ranked 66th▼ 6· 2024
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex and education (%)13.4Ranked 66th▼ 4· 2024
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex and marital status (%)13.4Ranked 39th▼ 5· 2024
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex, education and marital status (%)13.4Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2024
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)14.6Ranked 128th▼ 1· 2027
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment for persons ages 25 to 54 by sex, household type and presence of children (%)9.4Ranked 11th▼ 13· 2024
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex (%)10.8Ranked 30th▼ 13· 2013
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex and education (%)10.8Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2013
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex and marital status (%)10.8Ranked 29th▼ 13· 2013
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex, education and marital status (%)10.8Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2013
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force for persons ages 25 to 54 by sex, household type and presence of children (%)5.1Ranked 8th▼ 7· 2024
- LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization by sex (thousands)4,099Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2013
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex (%)17.5Ranked 25th▲ 16· 2013
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex and education (%)17.5Ranked 24th▲ 15· 2013
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex and marital status (%)17.5Ranked 24th▲ 15· 2013
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex, education and marital status (%)17.5Ranked 23rd▲ 14· 2013
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization for persons ages 25 to 54 by sex, household type and presence of children (%)10.9Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2024
- Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing)7.8Ranked 67th▲ 6· 2022
- Male employment in industry36.4%Ranked 24th—· 2025
- Male employment in services49.8%Ranked 100th—· 2025
- Male labor force participation rate67.2%Ranked 118th▲ 6· 2025
- Male unemployment rate6.8%Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2025
- Manufacturing, value added (annual % growth)2.3Ranked 90th▲ 51· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$)85.48BRanked 24th▼ 1· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU)19,707.33TRanked 1st—· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU)44,316.76TRanked 1st—· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$)97.86BRanked 23rd—· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP)20.6Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP)20.6%Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2024
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (current US$)185.64BRanked 27th▲ 1· 2025
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (% of GDP)51.2Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2025
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (% of GDP)51.2%Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2025
- Mean13.4Ranked 12th▼ 36· 2022
- Mean12.8Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Mean12.8Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Mean13.5Ranked 15th▼ 35· 2022
- Mean13.4Ranked 12th▼ 34· 2022
- Mean12.8Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Mean income or consumption per day12.8Ranked 43rd▼ 8· 2023
- Mean income or consumption per day (2011 prices)13.4Ranked 12th▼ 36· 2022
- Median10.8Ranked 10th▼ 36· 2022
- Median10.2Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Median (2021 prices)10.2Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Median income or consumption per day10.2Ranked 43rd▼ 8· 2023
- Medical doctors per 1,000 people1.8Ranked 28th▼ 56· 2023
- Medium and high-tech manufacturing value added (% manufacturing value added)36.4Ranked 40th▲ 8· 2022
- Merchandise trade as a proportion of GDP (%)38.3Ranked 146th▼ 14· 2024
- Merchandise trade (% of GDP)49.3Ranked 104th▼ 45· 2025
- Military expenditure (% of GDP)2.1%Ranked 54th▲ 10· 2025
- Military expenditure (% of GDP)1.8%Ranked 49th▲ 20· 2019
- Mineral rents (% of GDP)3.4Ranked 30th▲ 10· 2021
- Mismanaged plastic waste6Ranked 79th· 2019
- Monetary Sector credit to private sector (% GDP)57.8Ranked 55th▼ 3· 2016
- Monthly minimum wage (local currency)53.07MRanked 1st—· 2024
- Multilateral debt service (% of public and publicly guaranteed debt service)14.1Ranked 14th▲ 9· 2024
- Multilateral debt service (TDS, current US$)10.8MRanked 12th▲ 4· 2024
- National estimates7.6%Ranked 26th—· 2024
- Natural gas rents (% of GDP)8.8Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2021
- NBER-United Nations45.2Ranked 31st▼ 29· 2000
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex (%)24.3Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2024
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and citizenship (%)24.3Ranked 11th—· 2024
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and education (%)24.3Ranked 16th—· 2024
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and marital status (%)24.3Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2024
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and place of birth (%)41Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2011
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)26.2Ranked 42nd—· 2027
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and citizenship (thousands)2,751.7Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and education (thousands)2,751.7Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and marital status (thousands)2,751.7Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2024
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and place of birth (thousands)5,889.5Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2011
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)3,359.1Ranked 17th—· 2027
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex (thousands)2,751.7Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Net acquisition of financial assets (current LCU)93.99TRanked 1st—· 2006
- Net acquisition of financial assets (% of GDP)3.8Ranked 18th▲ 5· 2006
- Net barter terms of trade index (2015 = 100)119.8Ranked 45th▲ 14· 2024
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Estonia (current US$)14,064Ranked 29th· 2021
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania (current US$)13,860Ranked 29th▲ 11· 2023
- Net debt, General government, Domestic currency884,827.38TRanked 85th—· 2031
- Net debt, General government, Percent of GDP42.5Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2031
- Net domestic credit (current LCU)10,211.7TRanked 1st—· 2016
- Net errors and omissions (BoP, current US$)-1.36BRanked 129th▲ 115· 2000
- Net financial account (BoP, current US$)11.13BRanked 11th▼ 1· 2000
- Net financial flows, bilateral (NFL, current US$)-18.32MRanked 75th▼ 1· 2024
- Net financial flows, IBRD (NFL, current US$)-3.08MRanked 48th▲ 10· 2024
- Net financial flows, IMF nonconcessional (NFL, current US$)0Ranked 30th· 2022
- Net financial flows, multilateral (NFL, current US$)-5.16MRanked 94th▼ 1· 2024
- Net financial flows, others (NFL, current US$)-9MRanked 99th▲ 33· 2006
- Net flows on external debt, private nonguaranteed (PNG) (NFL, current US$)-166.55MRanked 23rd▲ 7· 2021
- Net foreign assets (current LCU)2473.74TRanked 1st—· 2016
- Net incurrence of liabilities, total (current LCU)29.32TRanked 1st▼ 66· 2006
- Net incurrence of liabilities, total (% of GDP)1.2Ranked 40th▼ 19· 2006
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets (current LCU)217.17TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Net investment in nonfinancial assets (% of GDP)5.3Ranked 29th▲ 8· 2009
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) (current LCU)18.55TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Domestic currency-75,190.87TRanked 187th—· 2031
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Percent of GDP-3.6Ranked 136th▼ 9· 2031
- Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) (% of GDP)0.45Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2009
- Net ODA received (% of central government expense)0.11Ranked 76th▲ 4· 2009
- Net ODA received (% of GNI)0.05Ranked 123rd▲ 5· 2023
- Net ODA received (% of gross capital formation)0.12Ranked 106th▲ 3· 2023
- Net ODA received (% of imports of goods, services and primary income)0.72Ranked 86th▼ 2· 2000
- Net ODA received per capita (current US$)2.7Ranked 131st▲ 7· 2023
- Net official development assistance and official aid received (constant 2023 US$)240.74MRanked 89th▲ 8· 2023
- Net official development assistance and official aid received (constant 2023 US$)240.74MRanked 90th▲ 8· 2023
- Net official development assistance and official aid received (current US$)240.74MRanked 90th▲ 7· 2023
- Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$)240.74MRanked 90th▲ 8· 2023
- Net official development assistance received (current US$)240.74MRanked 90th▲ 7· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, CERF (current US$)1MRanked 40th▼ 4· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, FAO (current US$)485,101Ranked 51st▼ 66· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA (current US$)471,241Ranked 50th▼ 24· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO (current US$)57,000Ranked 126th▼ 2· 2021
- Net official flows from UN agencies, SPRP (current US$)325,629Ranked 20th▼ 17· 2022
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNAIDS (current US$)45,620Ranked 71st▲ 35· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$)660,144Ranked 96th▲ 23· 2022
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$)2.13MRanked 56th▼ 5· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNHCR (current US$)6.3MRanked 14th▼ 7· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$)1.57MRanked 68th▼ 3· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNIDO (current US$)9,631Ranked 35th▼ 13· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$)560,000Ranked 57th▲ 28· 2008
- Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$)1.02MRanked 66th▼ 13· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, WHO (current US$)1.83MRanked 66th▼ 2· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, WTO-ITC (current US$)18,017Ranked 25th· 2020
- Net primary income (BoP, current US$)-200MRanked 72nd▼ 18· 2000
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current LCU)-588.87TRanked 156th▼ 39· 2025
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current US$)-792.98MRanked 73rd▼ 40· 2025
- Net secondary income (BoP, current US$)457MRanked 45th▲ 4· 2000
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (constant LCU)923.05BRanked 8th—· 2007
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current LCU)24.25TRanked 4th—· 2015
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current US$)819.7MRanked 68th▼ 4· 2015
- Net trade in goods and services (BoP, current US$)12.22BRanked 15th▼ 6· 2000
- Net trade in goods (BoP, current US$)13.14BRanked 16th▼ 2· 2000
- New business density (new registrations per 1,000 people ages 15-64)0.6Ranked 130th· 2020
- New businesses registered (number)36,158Ranked 33rd· 2020
- Number of countries reporting progress in multi-stakeholder development effectiveness monitoring frameworks that support the achievement of the sustainable development goals, Provider (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2016
- Number of countries with an outward investment promotion scheme which can benefit developing countries, including LDCs (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Number of policies26Ranked 49th· 2022
- Number of tourism satellite account tables implemented0Ranked 12th—· 2021
- Obesity prevalence25.7%Ranked 91st—· 2024
- ODA by recipient (% of GNI)0.07%Ranked 111th▼ 14· 2024
- ODA per capita by recipient3Ranked 126th▼ 4· 2024
- OEC ECI Ranking (Observatory of Economic Complexity (2016))89Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2013
- Official development assistance (ODA) by recipient275.86MRanked 83rd▼ 6· 2024
- Official exchange rate (LCU per US$, period average)42,000Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Oil rents (% of GDP)18.3Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2021
- Oil rents (% of GDP)18.3%Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2021
- Other expense (current LCU)116.37TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Other expense (% of expense)14.4Ranked 17th—· 2009
- Other manufacturing (% of value added in manufacturing)52.7Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2022
- Other taxes (current LCU)1.39TRanked 4th▼ 2· 2009
- Other taxes (% of revenue)0.13Ranked 92nd▲ 4· 2009
- Out-of-pocket as share of total expenditure (%)43.1%Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2023
- Output per hour worked, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202524Ranked 86th▲ 2· 2027
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202520,416.2Ranked 84th—· 2027
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202557,320.2Ranked 80th▲ 1· 2027
- Palma ratio (before tax)3.9Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2022
- Part time employment, female (% of total female employment)51.6Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2024
- Part time employment, male (% of total male employment)18.5Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2024
- Part time employment, total (% of total employment)23.9Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2024
- Passenger volume (passenger kilometres), by mode of transport - Air transport19.58BRanked 47th▲ 16· 2022
- Patent applications, nonresidents581Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2021
- Patent applications, residents10,210Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2021
- Per capita plastic waste0.14Ranked 56th· 2010
- Personal remittances1.03BRanked 51st▲ 9· 2004
- Personal remittances, received (current US$)1.03BRanked 51st▲ 9· 2004
- Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)0.55%Ranked 112th▲ 15· 2004
- Persons outside the labour force by sex and education (thousands)38,740.9Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2024
- Persons outside the labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)38,740.9Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2024
- Persons outside the labour force by sex, education and citizenship (thousands)38,740.9Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- Persons outside the labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)38,740.9Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2024
- Plastic waste exports21,047.4Ranked 35th▼ 31· 2018
- Plastic waste imports per capita0.03Ranked 100th▲ 15· 2018
- pl_c0.58Ranked 73rd▼ 47· 2019
- pl_con0.5Ranked 78th▼ 53· 2019
- pl_da0.56Ranked 66th▼ 63· 2019
- pl_g0.34Ranked 119th▼ 30· 2019
- pl_gdpo0.56Ranked 69th▼ 53· 2019
- pl_i0.67Ranked 53rd▼ 83· 2019
- pl_k1.2Ranked 16th▼ 19· 2019
- pl_m0.64Ranked 47th▲ 24· 2019
- pl_n0.33Ranked 124th▼ 36· 2019
- pl_x0.54Ranked 162nd▲ 9· 2019
- PNG, commercial banks and other creditors (NFL, current US$)-166.55MRanked 65th▼ 6· 2021
- Poorest 40% borrowing from financial institutions24.1%Ranked 43rd—· 2021
- Poorest decile1,463.5Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2022
- Poorest decile4.7Ranked 42nd▼ 8· 2023
- pop82.9Ranked 19th—· 2019
- Population ages 25 to 54 by household type (thousands)32,258.6Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Population by sex -- UN estimates and projections, July 2024 (thousands)77,077Ranked 16th—· 2030
- Population, Persons for countries / Index for country groups92.46MRanked 17th—· 2031
- Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$)0Ranked 62nd▲ 3· 1999
- Potential labour force by sex and education (thousands)48.6Ranked 46th▲ 10· 2013
- Potential labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)48.6Ranked 32nd▲ 19· 2013
- Potential labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)48.6Ranked 30th▲ 8· 2013
- Potential labour force by sex (thousands)48.6Ranked 49th▲ 33· 2013
- PPG, commercial banks (NFL, current US$)-20.97MRanked 52nd▲ 19· 2024
- PPG, IBRD (DOD, current US$)124.09MRanked 53rd—· 2024
- PPG, official creditors (NFL, US$)-23.48MRanked 91st▼ 5· 2024
- PPG, other private creditors (NFL, current US$)-18.31MRanked 41st▼ 16· 2017
- PPG, private creditors (NFL, US$)-20.97MRanked 65th▲ 28· 2024
- PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $)147,937.8Ranked 1st—· 2025
- PPP conversion factor, households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (LCU per international $)157,796Ranked 1st—· 2025
- PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $)113,984.9Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Present value of external debt (current US$)215.13MRanked 6th· 2024
- Present value of external debt (% of exports of goods, services and primary income)0.17Ranked 1st· 2024
- Present value of external debt (% of GNI)0.05Ranked 1st· 2024
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49)25.5%Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2023
- Price level index (GDP)19.9Ranked 182nd▲ 1· 2025
- Price levels relative to the US0.26Ranked 175th▼ 5· 2024
- Primary income payments (BoP, current US$)604MRanked 74th—· 2000
- Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$)404MRanked 57th▼ 11· 2000
- Primary net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Domestic currency-35,211.58TRanked 180th—· 2031
- Primary net lending (+) / net borrowing (-), General government, Percent of GDP-1.7Ranked 133rd▼ 5· 2031
- Productivity: output per hour worked22Ranked 71st—· 2023
- Productivity: output per hour worked22Ranked 71st—· 2023
- Projected change in death rate16Ranked 158th▼ 12· 2090
- Proportion of domestic budget funded by domestic taxes (%)32.7Ranked 134th▲ 4· 2009
- Proportion of individuals using the Internet (%)85.3Ranked 62nd▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of medium and high-tech manufacturing value added in total value added (%) - Manufacturing37.5%Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for family planning satisfied with modern methods (% of women aged 15-49 years)68.6%Ranked 13th· 2010
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (% of exports of goods, services and primary income)9.1Ranked 46th▼ 30· 2000
- Public and publicly guaranteed debt service (% of GNI)0.02Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Public private partnerships investment in transport (current US$)235MRanked 13th· 2016
- Public sector employment13.2%Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2019
- Public sector employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and education (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and marital status (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and occupation (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2024
- Public sector employment by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)3,493.1Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2024
- Rail lines (total route-km)9,455Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2021
- Railways, goods transported (million ton-km)32,920Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2021
- Railways, passengers carried (million passenger-km)11,231Ranked 9th▼ 13· 2021
- Railways, passengers carried (passenger-km)11.23BRanked 9th▼ 13· 2021
- Rate, Domestic currency per international dollar in PPP terms, ICP benchmarks 2017-2021959,624.8Ranked 1st—· 2031
- Ratio of business to personal tourism arrivals0Ranked 142nd· 2016
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate20.8%Ranked 177th—· 2025
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (modeled ILO estimate)20.8Ranked 178th—· 2025
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (national estimate)20.9Ranked 104th▼ 7· 2024
- Ratio of inbound to outbound tourist trips0.37Ranked 69th· 2021
- Ratio of same-day to overnight tourist arrivals0.12Ranked 45th· 2021
- Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202519.2Ranked 148th▼ 4· 2027
- rconna695,979Ranked 27th—· 2019
- rdana1.06MRanked 23rd—· 2019
- Real effective exchange rate index (2010 = 100)861.8Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Real GDP per capita (Maddison, 2011 int$)18,473.1Ranked 63rd—· 2022
- Real interest rate (%)3.4Ranked 93rd▲ 68· 2016
- Registered vehicles per 1,000 people357.3Ranked 4th· 2017
- Research and development expenditure (% of GDP)0.73%Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2021
- Researchers in R&D (per million people)2,239.7Ranked 38th▼ 9· 2021
- Reserves and related items (BoP, current US$)951.72MRanked 24th▼ 11· 2000
- Revenue, excluding grants (current LCU)1042.32TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Revenue, excluding grants (% of GDP)25.4Ranked 59th▼ 3· 2009
- Revenue, excluding grants (% of GDP)25.4%Ranked 59th▼ 3· 2009
- Revenue, General government, Domestic currency195,022.58TRanked 1st—· 2031
- Revenue, General government, Percent of GDP9.4Ranked 185th—· 2031
- rgdpe1.08MRanked 23rd▲ 1· 2019
- rgdpna1MRanked 25th▲ 2· 2019
- rgdpo1.1MRanked 23rd▲ 1· 2019
- Richest 1%14.7%Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2022
- Richest 1%15.7%Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Richest 1%15.7%Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Richest 10%28.2%Ranked 21st▼ 10· 2023
- rkna1Ranked 130th—· 2019
- rnna6.5MRanked 18th▲ 1· 2019
- rtfpna0.86Ranked 117th▲ 1· 2019
- rwtfpna0.94Ranked 104th▼ 9· 2019
- Saved any money (% age 15+)46.7%Ranked 71st▼ 20· 2021
- Scientific and technical journal articles55,085.3Ranked 14th—· 2023
- SDG indicator 10.4.1: Labour income share as a percent of GDP (%)34.9Ranked 157th▼ 1· 2026
- SDG indicator 1.3.1: Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems by sex and function (%)100Ranked 1st▼ 70· 2023
- SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (%)20.4Ranked 92nd▼ 2· 2024
- SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in senior and middle management positions (%)21.4Ranked 81st▼ 5· 2024
- SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US dollars (%)1.2Ranked 136th▼ 13· 2027
- SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international dollars at PPP (%)1.2Ranked 136th▼ 13· 2027
- SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training by sex (%)24.3Ranked 16th—· 2024
- SDG indicator 8.8.2: Level of national compliance with labour rights, freedom of association and collective bargaining10Ranked 1st—· 2024
- SDG indicator 8.b.1: Existence of a developed and operationalized national strategy for youth employment1Ranked 3rd· 2025
- SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (%)17.6Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$)82MRanked 63rd▼ 29· 2000
- Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$)539MRanked 67th▲ 3· 2000
- Self-employed, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)37Ranked 81st▲ 3· 2025
- Self-employed, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)44Ranked 68th—· 2025
- Self-employed, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)42.9Ranked 68th—· 2025
- Self-reported life satisfaction5.2Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2025
- Service exports (BoP, current US$)1.38BRanked 64th▼ 3· 2000
- Service imports (BoP, current US$)2.3BRanked 49th▲ 2· 2000
- Services, value added (annual % growth)-0.48Ranked 155th▲ 50· 2025
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$)270.23BRanked 31st▼ 2· 2025
- Services, value added (constant LCU)36,637.24TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Services, value added (current LCU)126,837.12TRanked 1st—· 2025
- Services, value added (current US$)170.8BRanked 43rd▲ 7· 2025
- Services, value added (% of GDP)47.1Ranked 123rd▼ 9· 2025
- Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)19,317.2Ranked 63rd▼ 7· 2025
- Share agreeing "Most people can be trusted"14.8%Ranked 60th▼ 9· 2022
- Share agreeing "Most people can be trusted"14.8%Ranked 60th▼ 9· 2022
- Share below $4.20 a day7.5%Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2023
- Share in extreme poverty2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share in vulnerable employment39.5%Ranked 119th▲ 1· 2025
- Share living with diabetes9%Ranked 70th▲ 45· 2024
- Share of central government spending funded by taxes32.7%Ranked 129th—· 2009
- Share of household consumption49%Ranked 150th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of one-person households7.2%Ranked 50th▲ 11· 2011
- Share of people who are undernourished6.8%Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of people who report having intentions to start business (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor)38.8Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2017
- Share of people who use tobacco12.5%Ranked 97th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of persons outside the labour force due to care responsibilities by sex (%)59.4Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of persons outside the labour force due to care responsibilities by sex and education (%)59.4Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of the labor force that is female16.9%Ranked 177th—· 2025
- Share of the richest 1%15.7%Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Share of the richest 10%45.6%Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2022
- Share of total calories from animal protein3.5%Ranked 131st▼ 7· 2023
- Share of workers who are employees56.8%Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, female (% of female youth population)34.1Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, female (% of female youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)36.2Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, male (% of male youth population)15.4Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2024
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, male (% of male youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)16.2Ranked 70th—· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, total (% of youth population)24.3Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, total (% of youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)26Ranked 42nd—· 2025
- Share (richest decile)28.2%Ranked 21st▼ 10· 2023
- Share (top 10%, before tax)45.6%Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2022
- Share (top 1%, before tax)15.7%Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Share (top 1%, before tax)15.7%Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Share who say they're "happy" or "very happy" (IVS)69.6%Ranked 88th▲ 34· 2022
- Short-term debt (% of exports of goods, services and primary income)12.2Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2000
- Short-term debt (% of total external debt)23.7Ranked 97th▼ 2· 2024
- Short-term debt (% of total reserves)62.1Ranked 34th▲ 29· 1982
- Social contributions (current LCU)194.79TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Social contributions (% of revenue)18.7Ranked 43rd▼ 5· 2009
- Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad (current US$)9.27BRanked 30th▲ 7· 2018
- Spending by international visitors while visiting a country5.25BRanked 48th▼ 1· 2018
- Spending by international visitors while visiting a country as a share of GDP1.3%Ranked 120th▼ 14· 2018
- statcap78.9Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2019
- Stocks traded, total value (current US$)21.9BRanked 32nd▲ 1· 2025
- Stocks traded, total value (% of GDP)6Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Stocks traded, turnover ratio of domestic shares (%)11Ranked 33rd▲ 8· 2024
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates - Sex: both sexes4.8%Ranked 24th▼ 13· 2017
- Subsidies and other transfers (current LCU)276.8TRanked 2nd—· 2009
- Subsidies and other transfers (% of expense)34.3Ranked 68th▲ 8· 2009
- Suicide rate4Ranked 151st▼ 8· 2021
- Sustainable fisheries as a proportion of GDP0.17%Ranked 52nd▲ 2· 2019
- Taxes as a share of cigarette price25.7%Ranked 159th▼ 7· 2022
- Taxes including social contributions7%Ranked 159th▲ 1· 2016
- Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU)2386.92TRanked 1st—· 2024
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU)7193.77TRanked 1st—· 2024
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$)15.89BRanked 45th▼ 5· 2024
- Taxes on exports (current LCU)34BRanked 4th▲ 2· 1995
- Taxes on exports (% of tax revenue)0.28Ranked 18th▲ 4· 1995
- Taxes on goods and services2.3%Ranked 149th▲ 4· 2016
- Taxes on goods and services2.3%Ranked 149th▲ 4· 2016
- Taxes on goods and services (current LCU)36.64TRanked 3rd▼ 1· 2009
- Taxes on goods and services (% of revenue)3.5Ranked 118th▲ 3· 2009
- Taxes on goods and services (% value added of industry and services)0.94Ranked 117th▲ 4· 2009
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains3.2%Ranked 128th▲ 5· 2016
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains (current LCU)201.67TRanked 2nd—· 2009
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains (% of revenue)19.3Ranked 73rd▼ 17· 2009
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains (% of total taxes)66.7Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2009
- Taxes on international trade (current LCU)62.55TRanked 1st—· 2009
- Taxes on international trade (% of revenue)6Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2009
- Tax revenue7%Ranked 159th▲ 1· 2016
- Tax revenue as a proportion of GDP (%)7.4Ranked 119th▲ 4· 2009
- Tax revenue as a proportion of GDP (%)7.4%Ranked 115th▲ 3· 2009
- Tax revenue (current LCU)302.25TRanked 2nd—· 2009
- Tax revenues (% of GDP)7%Ranked 159th▲ 1· 2016
- Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$)187.43MRanked 22nd—· 2023
- Terms of trade adjustment (constant LCU)-9327.9TRanked 129th▼ 28· 2025
- Textiles and clothing (% of value added in manufacturing)2.9Ranked 57th▼ 1· 2022
- Threshold (per day, poorest decile, 2021 prices)4.7Ranked 42nd▼ 8· 2023
- Threshold (per day, richest decile, 2021 prices)22.5Ranked 45th▼ 7· 2023
- Time-related underemployment by sex and education (thousands)1,541.9Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2024
- Time-related underemployment by sex and marital status (thousands)1,541.9Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2024
- Time-related underemployment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)1,541.9Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2024
- Time-related underemployment by sex (thousands)1,541.9Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2024
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex (%)6.3Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex and education (%)6.3Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex and marital status (%)6.3Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex, education and marital status (%)6.3Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Time required to start a business (days)72.5Ranked 7th—· 2019
- Total alcohol consumption per capita0.51Ranked 152nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total daily supply of fat per person83.3Ranked 110th▼ 7· 2023
- Total debt service (% of exports of goods, services and primary income)0.28Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Total debt service (% of GNI)0.08Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Total factor productivity level1.1Ranked 7th▼ 13· 2023
- Total government revenue (budgetary central government) as a proportion of GDP (%)31.2Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2009
- Total government revenue, in local currency1.12BRanked 1st—· 2009
- Total imports as a share of GDP10.8%Ranked 184th▼ 4· 2024
- Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)30.4Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)30.4%Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for technical cooperation (millions of 2023 United States dollars)3.58MRanked 132nd▲ 36· 2023
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for technical cooperation (millions of 2024 United States dollars)8.2Ranked 130th▼ 4· 2024
- Total official flows (commitments) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)4.42MRanked 126th—· 2023
- Total official flows (commitments) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)1.4Ranked 134th▲ 5· 2024
- Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)4.8Ranked 133rd▲ 1· 2024
- Total official flows for infrastructure, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)1.89MRanked 129th▲ 13· 2023
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$)7.69BRanked 21st▼ 18· 1982
- Total reserves in months of imports5.8Ranked 17th▼ 34· 1982
- Total reserves minus gold (current US$)5.7BRanked 19th▼ 22· 1982
- Total reserves (% of total external debt)92.9Ranked 70th▲ 3· 1982
- Total trade of tracked Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)7.49BRanked 42nd▼ 1· 2022
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)1.26MRanked 20th—· 2027
- Tourism sector employees by sex and public/private sector (thousands)469.6Ranked 11th—· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and citizenship (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and education (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and marital status (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and occupation (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Tourism sector employment by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)1,444.2Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Trade in services (% of GDP)3.4%Ranked 147th—· 2000
- Trade in services (% of GDP)3.4Ranked 147th—· 2000
- Trademark applications, nonresident, by count17,194Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2021
- Trademark applications, resident, by count506,935Ranked 3rd—· 2021
- Trade (% of GDP)60.2%Ranked 91st▼ 34· 2025
- Transport services (% of service exports, BoP)48.6Ranked 11th▼ 24· 2000
- Transport services (% of service imports, BoP)49.7Ranked 28th▼ 14· 2000
- Travel services (% of service exports, BoP)36.3Ranked 79th▼ 4· 2000
- Travel services (% of service imports, BoP)8.9Ranked 131st▲ 73· 2000
- Trips by domestic tourists per person0.73Ranked 29th—· 2011
- Trips per capita0.21Ranked 97th—· 2019
- Unemployment by sex and categories of unemployed persons (thousands)2,029.5Ranked 71st▼ 5· 2024
- Unemployment by sex and education (thousands)2,029.5Ranked 84th▼ 8· 2024
- Unemployment by sex and marital status (thousands)2,029.5Ranked 55th▼ 9· 2024
- Unemployment by sex, education and citizenship (thousands)2,029.5Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2024
- Unemployment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)2,029.5Ranked 54th▼ 7· 2024
- Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)15.6Ranked 162nd—· 2025
- Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (national estimate)14.3Ranked 95th▼ 9· 2024
- Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)6.8Ranked 128th▲ 2· 2025
- Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (national estimate)6.2Ranked 67th▼ 10· 2024
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex and former economic activity (thousands)1,105Ranked 49th▼ 7· 2024
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex and former occupation (thousands)1,105Ranked 49th▼ 4· 2024
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex, former economic activity and education (thousands)1,105Ranked 46th▼ 6· 2024
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex, occupation and education (thousands)1,105Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2024
- Unemployment rate9Ranked 77th▼ 1· 2031
- Unemployment rate8.3%Ranked 131st▲ 2· 2025
- Unemployment rate, ages 15-2421.9%Ranked 144th▲ 4· 2025
- Unemployment rate by sex and education (%)7.6Ranked 73rd▼ 9· 2024
- Unemployment rate by sex and marital status (%)7.6Ranked 48th▼ 9· 2024
- Unemployment rate by sex, education and citizenship (%)7.6Ranked 44th▼ 3· 2024
- Unemployment rate by sex, education and marital status (%)7.6Ranked 47th▼ 8· 2024
- Unemployment rate for persons ages 25 to 54 by sex, household type and presence of children (%)3.6Ranked 14th▼ 8· 2024
- Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (national estimate)7.6Ranked 79th▼ 7· 2024
- Unemployment with advanced education, female (% of female labor force with advanced education)19.1Ranked 84th▼ 10· 2024
- Unemployment with advanced education, male (% of male labor force with advanced education)7.7Ranked 77th▼ 10· 2024
- Unemployment with advanced education (% of total labor force with advanced education)11.3Ranked 81st▼ 10· 2024
- Unemployment with basic education, female (% of female labor force with basic education)5.1Ranked 27th▼ 5· 2024
- Unemployment with basic education, male (% of male labor force with basic education)5Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2024
- Unemployment with basic education (% of total labor force with basic education)5Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2024
- Unemployment with intermediate education, female (% of female labor force with intermediate education)14.9Ranked 76th▼ 13· 2024
- Unemployment with intermediate education, male (% of male labor force with intermediate education)7.4Ranked 59th▼ 19· 2024
- Unemployment with intermediate education (% of total labor force with intermediate education)8.3Ranked 64th▼ 13· 2024
- Unemployment, youth female (% of female labor force ages 15-24) (modeled ILO estimate)32Ranked 159th▲ 1· 2025
- Unemployment, youth female (% of female labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)30.4Ranked 96th▼ 6· 2024
- Unemployment, youth male (% of male labor force ages 15-24) (modeled ILO estimate)19.3Ranked 139th▲ 9· 2025
- Unemployment, youth male (% of male labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)17.7Ranked 73rd▼ 10· 2024
- Unemployment, youth total (% of total labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)20.2Ranked 76th▼ 11· 2024
- Unmet need for contraception (% of married women ages 15-49)5.7%Ranked 27th· 2010
- Usage of improved sanitation facilities100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Use of IMF credit (DOD, current US$)6.32BRanked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Value of global merchandise exports as a share of GDP (Fouquin and Hugot; CEPII 2016; National data)20.2%Ranked 118th▼ 22· 2014
- Value of global merchandise imports as a share of GDP (Fouquin and Hugot; CEPII 2016; National data)22.7%Ranked 154th▼ 21· 2014
- Volume of remittances (in United States dollars) as a proportion of total GDP (%)0.55Ranked 112th▲ 15· 2004
- Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)35.6Ranked 104th▼ 3· 2025
- Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)40.2Ranked 118th▼ 1· 2025
- Wage and salaried workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)63Ranked 102nd▼ 3· 2025
- Wage and salaried workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)56Ranked 115th—· 2025
- Wage and salaried workers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)57.1Ranked 115th—· 2025
- Wholesale price index (2010 = 100)126.2Ranked 1st—· 2007
- Women of reproductive age25.5%Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2023
- Women of reproductive age with anemia25.5%Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2023
- Work-based learners by sex, education and type of trainee (thousands)102.2Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Working age foreign citizens by sex and country of citizenship (thousands)1,795.4Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Working-age population by sex and education (thousands)65,338.3Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Working-age population by sex and labour market status (thousands)65,338.3Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2024
- Working-age population by sex and marital status (thousands)65,338.3Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2024
- Working-age population by sex, education and citizenship (thousands)65,338.3Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Working-age population by sex, education and labour market status (thousands)65,338.3Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2024
- Working-age population by sex, education and marital status (thousands)65,338.3Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2024
- Working-age population by sex, marital status and labour market status (thousands)65,338.3Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2024
- Working hours per worker2,246.1Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- xr42,000Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Yearly per capita supply of all meat29.9Ranked 127th▼ 4· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fruit123.4Ranked 36th▼ 10· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetable oils16.8Ranked 44th▼ 9· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetables105.4Ranked 84th▼ 32· 2023
- Youth participation rate in work-based learning by sex and type of trainee (per 1000 persons)4.6Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2024
- Youth work-based learners by sex and type of trainee (thousands)74.3Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Unemployment rate (ILO modelled)8.5%Ranked 137th▲ 3· 2027
- Youth unemployment rate (ILO modelled)22.2%Ranked 144th▼ 2· 2027
- Labour force participation rate40.3%Ranked 171st▼ 1· 2027
- Employment-to-population ratio36.9%Ranked 169th—· 2027
- Total factor productivity (current PPPs, USA=1)0.79Ranked 39th—· 2019
- Human capital index2.5Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2019
- Capital stock per worker264,263.1Ranked 56th▲ 1· 2019
Life expectancy
- Life expectancy77.9Ranked 76th▲ 3· 2024
- Infant mortality10.3Ranked 51st▼ 3· 2024
- Maternal mortality16Ranked 16th▼ 5· 2023
- Health spending6%Ranked 103rd▼ 11· 2023
- Physicians1.8Ranked 28th▼ 56· 2023
- Basic sanitation access90.5%Ranked 96th—· 2024
- Basic drinking water access97.9%Ranked 66th▼ 5· 2024
- Undernourishment6.8%Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Measles immunization99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence10Ranked 45th—· 2024
- Road traffic deaths21.5Ranked 89th—· 2019
- Suicide mortality rate4.1Ranked 40th▲ 3· 2021
- Smoking prevalence11.9%Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2024
- PM2.5 air pollution exposure40.2Ranked 178th▼ 6· 2023
- Child mortality1.1Ranked 54th▲ 3· 2024
- Daily caloric supply per capita2,875.2Ranked 105th▼ 2· 2023
- 0-140.19Ranked 127th▲ 7· 2021
- 0-27 days probability of death0.68%Ranked 47th—· 2019
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 0-4 years0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- 15–199.6Ranked 16th▼ 16· 2017
- 15–19 years8.9Ranked 9th▼ 11· 2017
- 15–19 years10.3Ranked 26th▼ 9· 2017
- 15–19 years9.6Ranked 16th▼ 16· 2017
- 15-19 years old, current drinkers (%)0.38Ranked 182nd▲ 35· 2019
- 15-19 years old heavy episodic drinkers (drinkers only), %4.8Ranked 145th· 2016
- 15-19 years old heavy episodic drinkers (population), % with 95%CI0Ranked 109th· 2010
- 15-19 years old heavy episodic drinkers (population), % with 95%CI0.1Ranked 135th▲ 9· 2016
- 15-19 years old total alcohol consumption in litres of pure alcohol1.6Ranked 95th· 2010
- 15-19 years old total alcohol consumption in litres of pure alcohol1.6Ranked 95th· 2010
- 15-19 years old total alcohol consumption in litres of pure alcohol - Sex: both sexes1.6Ranked 95th· 2010
- 20–248.9Ranked 68th▼ 6· 2021
- 20–24 years6.4Ranked 25th▲ 13· 2017
- 5-14 years0Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2021
- 70+ years118.1Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2021
- Access antibiotics28.7Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Adequate stool collection97%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Adult mortality rate (probability of dying between 15 and 60 years per 1000 population)120.6Ranked 57th▲ 5· 2021
- Adult obesity25.7%Ranked 91st—· 2024
- Adult T-cell leukemia and lymphoma100%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Affordability - percentage of GDP per capita required to purchase 2000 cigarettes of the most sold brand2.2Ranked 127th▲ 29· 2022
- Age-standardized230.3Ranked 25th▼ 7· 2017
- Age-standardized83.4Ranked 72nd▼ 3· 2017
- Age-standardized cervical cancer incidence rate per 100,000 women2.5Ranked 175th· 2022
- Age-standardized DALYs, alcohol use disorders, per 100,00059Ranked 137th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, breast cancer, per 100,00085Ranked 97th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, cerebrovascular disease, per 100,000764Ranked 93rd· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, colon and rectum cancers, per 100,00076Ranked 64th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, diabetes mellitus, per 100,000372Ranked 106th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, drownings, per 100,00080Ranked 97th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, falls, per 100,000300Ranked 19th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, fires, per 100,000114Ranked 65th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, ischaemic heart disease, per 100,0001,769Ranked 38th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, liver cancer, per 100,00019.3Ranked 161st· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, liver cirrhosis, per 100,00051Ranked 145th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, mouth and oropharynx cancer, per 100,00031Ranked 74th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, oesophagus cancer, per 100,000199Ranked 9th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, other unintentional injuries, per 100,000734Ranked 67th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, poisoning, per 100,00065Ranked 65th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, prematurity and low birth rate, per 100,000543Ranked 65th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, road traffic accidents, per 100,0001,512Ranked 7th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, self-inflicted injury, per 100,000157Ranked 90th· 2004
- Age-standardized DALYs, violence, per 100,000114Ranked 113th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rate from cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, endocarditis among both sexes1.5Ranked 6th—· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes196.3Ranked 69th▼ 1· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from hypertensive heart disease among both sexes22.6Ranked 102nd▼ 3· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from ischaemic heart disease among both sexes112Ranked 122nd▲ 2· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from rheumatic heart disease among both sexes1.2Ranked 96th▲ 10· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from self-harm among both sexes4Ranked 42nd▲ 8· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from self-harm among males5.6Ranked 37th▲ 6· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from snakebite envenoming0.06Ranked 6th· 2019
- Age-standardized death rate from stroke among both sexes49.2Ranked 58th▲ 2· 2021
- Age-standardized death rate from tuberculosis among both sexes1.2Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2021
- Age-standardized death rates, alcohol use disorders, per 100,0001.2Ranked 13th▼ 21· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, breast cancer, per 100,0005.7Ranked 16th▲ 10· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, cerebrovascular disease, per 100,000108.9Ranked 97th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, colon and rectum cancers, per 100,0006.6Ranked 39th▼ 20· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, diabetes mellitus, per 100,00016.9Ranked 46th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, drownings, per 100,0002.7Ranked 22nd▼ 41· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, falls, per 100,0004.4Ranked 41st▼ 102· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, fires, per 100,0002Ranked 18th▼ 136· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, ischaemic heart disease, per 100,000221.6Ranked 156th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, liver cancer, per 100,0001.8Ranked 9th▼ 104· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, liver cirrhosis, per 100,0003.5Ranked 5th▼ 31· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, mouth and oropharynx cancer, per 100,0003.2Ranked 21st▲ 16· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, oesophagus cancer, per 100,00022.2Ranked 79th▼ 53· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, other unintentional injuries, per 100,00014.4Ranked 64th· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, poisoning, per 100,0003Ranked 29th▼ 59· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, prematurity and low birth rate, per 100,00014.6Ranked 83rd· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, road traffic accidents, per 100,00059.5Ranked 141st▼ 45· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, self-inflicted injury, per 100,0006Ranked 35th▼ 64· 2004
- Age-standardized death rates, violence, per 100,0002.8Ranked 24th▼ 55· 2004
- Age-standardized deaths from bladder cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people2.2Ranked 42nd▲ 5· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from brain and nervous system cancers in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people5.3Ranked 85th▲ 9· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from breast cancer in females in those aged all ages per 100,000 people10.1Ranked 18th▲ 5· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from cervix uteri cancer in females in those aged all ages per 100,000 people0.56Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from colon and rectum cancers in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people6.6Ranked 18th—· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from liver cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people5Ranked 59th▲ 4· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from maternal conditions in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people0.17Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from pancreas cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people3.4Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from prostate cancer in males in those aged all ages per 100,000 people9.5Ranked 22nd—· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths from stomach cancer in both sexes in those aged all ages per 100,000 people12.6Ranked 88th▲ 1· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from cardiovascular diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages230.3Ranked 68th▲ 5· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from diabetes mellitus, blood and endocrine disorders per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages35.7Ranked 72nd▲ 3· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from digestive diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages14.9Ranked 25th—· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from infectious and parasitic diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages8.7Ranked 40th▲ 4· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from malignant neoplasms per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages83.4Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from maternal conditions per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages0.17Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from respiratory diseases per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages27.7Ranked 69th▲ 14· 2017
- Age-standardized deaths that are from respiratory infections per 100,000 people, in both sexes aged all ages16Ranked 48th▲ 17· 2017
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)51Ranked 41st· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)9Ranked 9th· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)58Ranked 39th· 2019
- Age-standardized NCD mortality rate (per 100 000 population)395.2Ranked 40th▼ 15· 2021
- Age-standardized prevalence of current tobacco use among persons aged 15 years and older, by sex (%) - Both sexes13.3%Ranked 89th▼ 4· 2022
- Age-standardized suicide rates (per 100 000 population)4.1Ranked 145th▼ 6· 2021
- AIDS-related deaths1,649.6Ranked 94th· 2024
- Alcohol124.8Ranked 93rd▼ 6· 2021
- Alcohol, 15-19 years heavy continuous drinkers, drinkers only, past year (%)9.2Ranked 17th· 2019
- Alcohol, 15-19 years heavy continuous drinkers past year (%)0.04Ranked 144th· 2019
- Alcohol, abstainers lifetime (%), age-standardized97Ranked 8th—· 2020
- Alcohol, abstainers past 12 months (%), age-standardized98.5Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, abstainers past 12 months (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes98.5%Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Alcohol-attributable all-cause deaths (all ages), (number)2,286.8Ranked 87th· 2019
- Alcohol-attributable DALYs lost from all causes (all ages), (number)115,820.7Ranked 93rd· 2019
- Alcohol-attributable fractions, all-cause deaths (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: Total (All ages)0.63%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Alcohol, average daily intake in grams among drinkers, three-year average71.2Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2020
- Alcohol, consumers past 12 months (%)4.2Ranked 53rd· 2010
- Alcohol, consumers past 12 months (%), age-standardized1.5Ranked 179th▼ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, consumers past 12 months (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes1.5%Ranked 179th▼ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, consumption of pure alcohol by type of beverage (%) - Beverage types: Beer75.4%Ranked 14th—· 2019
- Alcohol, consumption of pure alcohol by type of beverage (%) - Beverage types: Spirits24.6%Ranked 94th—· 2019
- Alcohol, consumption of pure alcohol by type of beverage (%) - Beverage types: Wine0.02%Ranked 177th—· 2019
- Alcohol, drinkers only per capita (15+)consumption in litres of pure alcohol24.8Ranked 19th· 2010
- Alcohol, drinkers only per capita (15+) consumption in litres of pure alcohol, three-year average32.8Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2020
- Alcohol, former drinkers (%), age-standardized1.4Ranked 178th—· 2020
- Alcohol, harmful use (15+), 12 month prevalence (%) with 95%CI0.1Ranked 25th· 2010
- Alcohol, heavy continuous drinkers, drinkers only, past year (%)19.1Ranked 12th· 2019
- Alcohol, heavy continuous drinkers past year (%)0.29Ranked 147th· 2019
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+), drinkers only, past 30 days (%)0.4Ranked 42nd· 2010
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+), drinkers only, past 30 days (%), age-standardized25.7Ranked 158th▼ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+), drinkers only, past 30 days (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes25.7%Ranked 158th▼ 1· 2020
- Alcohol, heavy episodic drinking (15+) past 30 days (%), age-standardized0.39Ranked 176th▼ 3· 2020
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), by beverage type - Beverage types: Beer0Ranked 176th▼ 1· 2022
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), by beverage type - Beverage types: Wine0Ranked 141st▼ 4· 2022
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average0Ranked 177th—· 2024
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average0Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2010
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average0Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2010
- Alcohol, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average with 95%CI0Ranked 91st· 2010
- Alcohol-related crimes (% of all crimes)0.9Ranked 2nd· 2001
- Alcohol, total per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) (SDG Indicator 3.5.2), three-year average0.02Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- Alcohol, total per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI1Ranked 90th· 2018
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)1Ranked 98th▼ 3· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)1Ranked 98th▼ 3· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI1Ranked 98th· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded 3 year average + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI1Ranked 98th· 2010
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption, projected estimates for 20161Ranked 100th· 2012
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption, projected estimates for 20161Ranked 100th· 2012
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption, projections0.06Ranked 176th—· 2030
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption with 95%CI, projections to 20251Ranked 93rd—· 2025
- Alcohol, total (recorded + unrecorded) per capita (15+) consumption with 95%CI, projections to 20251Ranked 93rd—· 2025
- Alcohol, tourist consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average0Ranked 55th—· 2024
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)1Ranked 29th—· 2015
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol)1Ranked 29th—· 2015
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol), three-year average0.02Ranked 170th—· 2024
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI1Ranked 29th· 2010
- Alcohol, unrecorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) with 95%CI1Ranked 29th· 2010
- All cases of new TB85Ranked 14th—· 2023
- All malignant cancers combined4.4Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2017
- Amount of water- and sanitation-related official development assistance that is part of a government-coordinated spending plan (constant 2024 US$ millions)1.7Ranked 113th▼ 4· 2024
- Annual budget for tobacco control in currency reported435,000Ranked 59th▲ 12· 2022
- Annual mortality rate (ages 65+)49.1Ranked 79th· 2011
- Annual tax revenues - total excise (specific and ad valorem)0Ranked 25th· 2022
- Antenatal care attendees positive for syphilis who received treatment (%), reported100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Antenatal care attendees who were positive for syphilis (%), reported0Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2024
- Antenatal care coverage - at least four visits (%)94.3Ranked 7th· 2005
- Antenatal care coverage - at least four visits (%)94.3%Ranked 7th· 2005
- Antenatal care coverage - at least one visit (%)96.9Ranked 9th· 2010
- Antibiotic usage in children61.6%Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2018
- Antiretroviral therapy coverage among people with advanced HIV infection (%), WHO 2006 guidelines6Ranked 56th· 2009
- Antiretroviral therapy coverage among people with HIV infection eligible for ART according to 2010 guidelines (%)12.8Ranked 91st· 2012
- ARI treatment (% of children under 5 taken to a health provider)75.9%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2010
- ARI treatment (% of children under 5 taken to a health provider)75.9Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2010
- Attribution of road traffic deaths to alcohol (%)1.7%Ranked 12th· 2017
- Availability of estimates on impoverishment due to out-of-pocket health expenditures1Ranked 1st—· 2013
- Availability of estimates on large health expenditures as a share of total expenditure or income1Ranked 1st—· 2013
- Average cost of drugs spent per patient starting multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment28,730Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2022
- Average daily intake in grams of alcohol, population (15+)1.1Ranked 163rd▲ 3· 2020
- Average death rate due to natural disasters (per 100 000 population)0.01Ranked 2nd▼ 19· 2011
- Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores76.2Ranked 70th▲ 55· 2017
- Average of 13 International Health Regulations core capacity scores, SPAR version, 1st edition88Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2020
- Average per capita alcohol consumption (15-19 year old males)2.5Ranked 116th· 2010
- Average price 500 mls Beer in US$5.1Ranked 12th· 2016
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - ad valorem excise0Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - import duties0Ranked 16th▲ 6· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - other taxes2Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - specific excise0Ranked 81st▲ 10· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - total tax4.3Ranked 93rd▼ 3· 2014
- Average - taxes as a % of cigarette price - value added tax2.3Ranked 36th—· 2014
- Bans on tobacco advertising5Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Basis for NHA estimate0Ranked 1st· 2011
- BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)96Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2025
- BCG immunized, coverage among 1-year-olds (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Beds for mental health in general hospitals (per 100,000)4.7Ranked 7th· 2017
- Beds in community residential facilities (per 100,000)15.3Ranked 4th· 2017
- Beds in mental hospitals (per 100,000)8.5Ranked 12th· 2017
- Births attended by skilled health personnel (%)99Ranked 9th▲ 7· 2023
- Births attended by skilled health staff (% of total)99%Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2014
- Births attended by skilled health staff (% of total)99Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2014
- Births by caesarean section (%)45.6Ranked 1st· 2010
- Bladder2.2Ranked 51st▼ 7· 2017
- Both sexes4Ranked 151st▼ 8· 2021
- Breast0.3%Ranked 74th· 2020
- Cancer and neoplasms16.2%Ranked 69th▼ 3· 2017
- Cancers83.4Ranked 72nd▼ 3· 2017
- Cancer survival for those diagnosed with breast cancer, 5-year net survival (%)54.2Ranked 132nd· 2021
- Cardiovascular diseases death rate196.3Ranked 69th▼ 1· 2021
- Care-seeking for children with symptoms of acute respiratory infection (%)52.9Ranked 8th▲ 5· 2015
- Case detection rate (all forms)73%Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2024
- Case fatality ratio (percentage)10%Ranked 25th▲ 4· 2024
- Cases started on MDR-TB treatment38Ranked 88th▼ 2· 2024
- Cause of death, by communicable diseases and maternal, prenatal and nutrition conditions (% of total)29.5Ranked 110th▼ 9· 2021
- Cause of death, by injury (% of total)6.8Ranked 95th▲ 10· 2021
- Cause of death, by non-communicable diseases (% of total)56.6Ranked 70th▼ 1· 2021
- Cause of death, by other COVID-19 pandemic-related outcomes (% of total)7Ranked 102nd▲ 18· 2021
- Cautions and arrests for drink-driving, per 100,000 population1.1Ranked 10th· 2012
- Central death rate at 250.12Ranked 92nd▼ 11· 2023
- Central death rate at 651.2Ranked 30th▼ 6· 2023
- Change in female height (%)7.5%Ranked 45th· 1996
- Change in female height (cm)11.1Ranked 45th· 1996
- Change in male height (%)10.5%Ranked 1st· 1996
- Change in male height (cm)16.5Ranked 1st· 1996
- Change in maternal mortality ratio since 1990-79.7%Ranked 11th▲ 10· 2015
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported50,000Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in PPP$1.7Ranked 128th· 2020
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates1.2Ranked 99th· 2020
- Chemical events60Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2023
- Child deaths age 1 to 41,223Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2024
- Child deaths from rotavirus156Ranked 39th· 2016
- Child mortality (per 1000 live births)2.1Ranked 65th—· 2100
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.2%Ranked 79th▲ 2· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.2%Ranked 93rd▼ 5· 2023
- Child mortality rate0.02Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 54th▲ 3· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.02Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 83rd▲ 3· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.2%Ranked 93rd▼ 5· 2023
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Child mortality rate from rotavirus1.9Ranked 17th· 2016
- Child mortality rate (full)1.1%Ranked 85th▲ 4· 2024
- Children aged <5 years wasted for age (%)4.8Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2004
- Children aged <5 years with diarrhoea receiving ORS (%)61.4Ranked 4th· 2010
- Children orphaned due to AIDS24,799.5Ranked 52nd· 2024
- Cholera case fatality rate0%Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2020
- Cholera case fatality rate1.2Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2015
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) diagnosis coverage as a percentage of infected (%)28Ranked 21st· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infected persons diagnosed (number)366,852Ranked 11th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) treatment rate as percentage of diagnosed (%)7Ranked 29th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis B (HBV) treatment rate as percentage of total infected (%)2Ranked 13th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) cumulative treatment rate as percentage of total infected, including cured (%)14Ranked 23rd· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) diagnosis coverage as percentage of total HCV infected, including cured (%)46Ranked 15th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infected persons diagnosed, including cured (number)109,290Ranked 19th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infected persons diagnosed (number)77,799Ranked 18th· 2022
- Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) treatment rate as percentage of diagnosed (%)30Ranked 30th· 2022
- Cigarette consumption per smoker per day20.9Ranked 48th▼ 4· 2012
- Circulating Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus (cVDPV) cases0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Civil registration coverage of cause-of-death (%)68.3Ranked 1st· 2006
- CME_ARR_10T190.3Ranked 50th· 2021
- CME_ARR_SBR3.2Ranked 12th· 2023
- CME_ARR_U5MR3.5Ranked 30th· 2023
- CME_MRM07.2Ranked 108th—· 2024
- CME_MRM1T112.8Ranked 117th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_MRM1T593.8Ranked 126th—· 2024
- CME_MRY010.3Ranked 113th▼ 3· 2024
- CME_MRY10T141.7Ranked 91st▼ 2· 2024
- CME_MRY10T196.4Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2024
- CME_MRY15T194.7Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY15T2410.5Ranked 68th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY1T41Ranked 137th▼ 2· 2024
- CME_MRY20T245.8Ranked 82nd▲ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY5T143.2Ranked 89th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_MRY5T2413.6Ranked 86th—· 2024
- CME_MRY5T91.5Ranked 85th▼ 2· 2024
- CME_PND0.63Ranked 36th—· 2024
- CME_SB6,397Ranked 49th▲ 1· 2023
- CME_SBR5.4Ranked 124th—· 2023
- CME_TMM08,293Ranked 45th—· 2024
- CME_TMM1T113,676Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMM1T594,899Ranked 53rd▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY011,969Ranked 47th—· 2024
- CME_TMY0T413,192Ranked 51st▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY10T142,363Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2024
- CME_TMY10T198,378Ranked 30th—· 2024
- CME_TMY15T196,015Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY15T2412,760Ranked 25th—· 2024
- CME_TMY1T41,223Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY20T246,745Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T144,632Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T2417,392Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T92,269Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2024
- Commitments to recipient countries (Million, constant 2009 US$)12.5Ranked 97th▼ 13· 2010
- Community Health Workers (number)59,000Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2024
- Community health workers (per 1,000 people)0.36Ranked 12th· 2004
- Community health workers (per 1,000 people)0.36Ranked 12th· 2004
- Community residential facilities (per 100,000)0.22Ranked 3rd· 2017
- Completeness of cause-of-death data (%)90.1Ranked 11th· 2016
- Compliance of ban on advertising at point of sale7Ranked 4th· 2014
- Compliance of ban on advertising on billboards and outdoor advertising10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on advertising on local magazines and newspapers10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on advertising on national TV and radio9Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on appearance of tobacco brands in TV and/or films (product placement)10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance of ban on appearance of tobacco products in TV and/or films7Ranked 3rd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on brand name of non-tobacco products used for tobacco product8Ranked 3rd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on free distribution of tobacco products in the mail or through other means7Ranked 4th· 2014
- Compliance of ban on non-tobacco goods AND services identified with tobacco brand names9Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on promotional discounts9Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES EXCEPT UNIVERSITIES9Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in GOVERNMENT FACILITIES8Ranked 3rd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in HEALTH-CARE FACILITIES9Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in INDOOR OFFICES9Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in PUBLIC TRANSPORT8Ranked 3rd· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in PUBS AND BARS2Ranked 9th· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in RESTAURANTS6Ranked 5th· 2014
- Compliance of ban on smoking in UNIVERSITIES7Ranked 4th· 2014
- Compliance of ban on sponsored events10Ranked 1st· 2014
- Compliance with ban on advertising at point of sale (score)4Ranked 7th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on advertising in local magazines and newspapers (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on advertising on national television and radio (score)9Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Compliance with ban on appearance of tobacco brands in TV and/or films (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on appearance of tobacco products in TV and/or films (score)5Ranked 6th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on billboard and outdoor advertising (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on free distribution in mail or through other means (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on indentifying non-tobacco products with tobacco brand names (score)9Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Compliance with ban on promotional discounts (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on sponsorship (contributions and/or publicity of contributions) (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with ban on use of brand name of non-tobacco product for tobacco product (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with bans on direct advertising10Ranked 1st—· 2014
- Compliance with bans on promotion and sponsorship8Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2014
- Compliance with international health regulations85Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2015
- Compliance with regulations on smoke-free environments (national legislation)6Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2014
- Compliance with smoke-free education facilities except universities law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free government facilities law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free health-care facilities law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free indoor offices law (score)9Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free public transport law (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free pubs and bars law (score)5Ranked 6th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free restaurants law (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free universities law (score)6Ranked 5th· 2022
- Confirmed cases of MDR-TB50Ranked 56th▼ 9· 2012
- Confirmed cases of MDR-TB started treatment for MDR-TB (%)34Ranked 42nd▲ 13· 2012
- Confirmed cases of RR-/MDR-TB42Ranked 87th▼ 8· 2024
- Confirmed tetanus cases (WHO)6Ranked 50th▲ 6· 2024
- Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases0Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2025
- Congenital syphilis number of cases, reported0Ranked 31st· 2018
- Congenital syphilis rate per 100 000 live births, reported0Ranked 47th· 2018
- Consumption of iodized salt (% of households)93.5Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2000
- Consumption of iodized salt (% of households)93.5%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2000
- Cost of a healthy diet4.4Ranked 63rd▲ 1· 2024
- Cost of drugs per patient17,305Ranked 9th· 2017
- Coverage of opioid agonist maintenance therapy (percent)5.4Ranked 12th▲ 6· 2021
- Coverage of people living with HIV receiving ART48.9%Ranked 111th· 2024
- Cumulative maternal under-five offspring mortality among mothers aged 20-44 as a rate per 1000 mothers in the age group4.8Ranked 57th· 2016
- Current health expenditure (CHE) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)6%Ranked 103rd▼ 11· 2023
- Current health expenditure (CHE) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)6Ranked 103rd▼ 11· 2023
- Current health expenditure (CHE) per capita in US$267.1Ranked 116th▼ 1· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita (current US$)267.1Ranked 116th▼ 1· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita (int-$)1,064.1Ranked 99th▼ 4· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)1,064.1Ranked 99th▼ 4· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)1,064.1Ranked 99th▼ 4· 2023
- DALYs from all causes among both sexes25.03MRanked 20th▼ 1· 2021
- DALYs from all causes, among both sexes per 100,000 people28,468.2Ranked 148th▼ 4· 2021
- DALYs from drug use disorders, among both sexes per 100,000 people357.6Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2021
- Death rate due to road traffic injuries, by sex (per 100,000 population)20.6Ranked 110th· 2021
- Death rate from alcohol use disorders among both sexes0.14Ranked 12th▲ 4· 2021
- Death rate from alzheimer disease and other dementias among both sexes12.8Ranked 109th▼ 7· 2021
- Death rate from amphetamine use disorders among both sexes0.13Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2021
- Death rate from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes156.2Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2021
- Death rate from cocaine use disorders among both sexes0.28Ranked 27th▲ 4· 2021
- Death rate from diabetes mellitus among both sexes14.2Ranked 46th▲ 7· 2021
- Death rate from diarrhoeal diseases among both sexes0.55Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2021
- Death rate from drowning among both sexes0.81Ranked 26th▲ 7· 2021
- Death rate from drug use disorders among both sexes3.1Ranked 101st▲ 4· 2021
- Death rate from falls among both sexes2.5Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2021
- Death rate from fire, heat and hot substances among both sexes1.6Ranked 82nd▲ 7· 2021
- Death rate from HIV/AIDS among both sexes2.7Ranked 58th▼ 2· 2021
- Death rate from lower respiratory infections among both sexes8.8Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2021
- Death rate from malaria among both sexes0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Death rate from malignant neoplasms among both sexes99.5Ranked 100th▼ 19· 2021
- Death rate from meningitis among both sexes0.46Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2021
- Death rate from mental and substance use disorders among both sexes3.2Ranked 106th▲ 15· 2021
- Death rate from opioid use disorders among both sexes1.9Ranked 78th▲ 9· 2021
- Death rate from parkinson disease among both sexes2.1Ranked 70th▼ 5· 2021
- Death rate from poisoning0.62Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2021
- Death rate from road injury among both sexes20.7Ranked 151st▲ 9· 2021
- Death rate from self-harm among both sexes4Ranked 39th▲ 5· 2021
- Death rate from substance use disorders among both sexes3.2Ranked 137th▲ 10· 2021
- Death rate from tuberculosis among both sexes1.1Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2021
- Death rate in men226.5Ranked 59th—· 2017
- Deaths caused by chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infection (number)6,367Ranked 124th· 2022
- Deaths caused by chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection (number)361Ranked 72nd· 2022
- Deaths due to HIV/AIDS (per 100 000 population)6Ranked 17th· 2012
- Deaths due to tuberculosis among HIV-negative people (per 100 000 population)1Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2024
- Deaths due to tuberculosis among HIV-negative people (per 100 000 population)1Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2024
- Deaths from cardiovascular diseases per 100,000 people in both sexes aged all ages172.2Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2017
- Deaths from snakebite envenoming42Ranked 39th· 2019
- Deaths from trachea, bronchus, lung cancers per 100,000 people in males aged all ages10.5Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2017
- Deaths prevented by rotavirus vaccine0Ranked 1st· 2016
- Defined daily doses of antibiotics and antituberculosis drugs used per 1,000 inhabitants per day65.8Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Dementia-specific hospital beds (per 10,000 population)0Ranked 5th· 2017
- Density of outpatient health centres (per 100,000 population)4,000Ranked 4th· 2017
- Dental Assistants and Therapists (number)4,743Ranked 1st· 2006
- Dental Prosthetic Technicians (number)2,487Ranked 3rd· 2004
- Dentists (number)47,640Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2023
- Dentists (per 10,000)5.3Ranked 46th▼ 12· 2023
- Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79)9Ranked 70th▲ 45· 2024
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under 5 receiving oral rehydration and continued feeding)68.9Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under 5 who received ORS packet)61.4%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2011
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under 5 who received ORS packet)61.4Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2011
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under five receiving oral rehydration and continued feeding)68.9%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Digestive diseases2.7%Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2017
- Diphtheria - number of reported cases0Ranked 36th—· 2025
- Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis (DTP3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis first-dose (DTP1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC)99Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2025
- Disbursements to recipient countries (Million, constant 2009 US$)11.4Ranked 100th▼ 12· 2010
- DM_BRTS1,125.2Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2025
- DM_BRTS_SURVIVING_1612.5Ranked 42nd—· 2100
- DM_DPR_CHD31.7Ranked 113th—· 2025
- DM_DPR_OLD12.4Ranked 112th▼ 3· 2025
- DM_DPR_TOT44.1Ranked 184th—· 2025
- DM_FRATE_TOT1.7Ranked 131st—· 2025
- DM_LIFE_EXP78.1Ranked 73rd—· 2025
- DM_NET_MG_RATE1.3Ranked 60th▲ 12· 2025
- DM_POP_15TO2412,365.6Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2025
- DM_POP_ADLCNT13,770Ranked 17th—· 2025
- DM_POP_ADLCNT_PROP14.9Ranked 117th▼ 2· 2025
- DM_POP_CHILD_PROP26.3Ranked 110th—· 2025
- DM_POP_GRT0.86Ranked 103rd▲ 5· 2025
- DM_POP_TOT92,417.7Ranked 17th—· 2025
- DM_POP_U1824,330.2Ranked 19th—· 2025
- DM_POP_U55,899.2Ranked 23rd—· 2025
- Domestic Expenditure on Malaria1.37MRanked 38th▼ 13· 2024
- Domestic funding7.2MRanked 33rd▲ 4· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)46.7Ranked 116th—· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of general government expenditure (GGE) (%)19.1Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of general government expenditure (GGE) (%)19.1%Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)2.8Ranked 102nd▼ 7· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) per capita in US$124.8Ranked 117th▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)46.7Ranked 116th—· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)46.7%Ranked 116th—· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP)2.8Ranked 102nd▼ 7· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP)2.8%Ranked 102nd▼ 7· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of general government expenditure)19.1Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure per capita (current US$)124.8Ranked 117th▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)497.2Ranked 103rd—· 2023
- Domestic government497.2Ranked 103rd—· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)52.6Ranked 42nd—· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure per capita (current US$)140.4Ranked 98th▲ 1· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)559.3Ranked 75th▼ 4· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure (PVT-D) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)52.6Ranked 42nd—· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure (PVT-D) per capita in US$140.4Ranked 98th▲ 1· 2023
- Drug use disorders2,688.6Ranked 7th—· 2021
- DTP3 immunized, coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Early initiation of breastfeeding (%)68.7Ranked 5th· 2011
- Early Initiation of Breastfeeding, Children born in the last 24 months80.6Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2017
- ECON_GVT_EDU_EXP_PTEXP21.9Ranked 14th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_EDU_EXP_PTGDP2.7Ranked 147th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_EXP_PTGDP13.2Ranked 126th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_HLTH_EXP_PTEXP26.1Ranked 1st· 2024
- ECON_GVT_HLTH_EXP_PTGDP3.2Ranked 104th· 2024
- ECON_ODA_INFLOW_PTGNI0.07Ranked 122nd· 2024
- ECON_ODA_INFLOW_USD311.8Ranked 82nd· 2024
- ECON_SOC_PRO_EXP_PTEXP0Ranked 107th· 2024
- ED_ANAR_L0296.7Ranked 3rd· 2011
- ED_ANAR_L196.7Ranked 3rd· 2011
- ED_ROFST_L02_ADM35.6Ranked 16th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L1_ADM0.14Ranked 58th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L2_ADM1.7Ranked 39th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L3_ADM17.3Ranked 33rd· 2020
- Environmental and Occupational Health and Hygiene Professionals (number)4,128Ranked 2nd· 2004
- Environmental and Occupational Health Inspectors and Associates (number)21,446Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2006
- Escherichia coli9.1Ranked 64th▲ 3· 2023
- Estimated direct deaths from major conflicts (per 100 000 population)0.03Ranked 52nd· 2016
- Estimated HIV in incident tuberculosis1.5%Ranked 73rd—· 2024
- Estimated incidence of all forms of tuberculosis10Ranked 107th▼ 2· 2024
- Estimated malaria incidence (per 1000 population at risk)2.2Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2024
- Estimated malaria mortality rate (per 100 000 population)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Estimated malaria mortality rate (per 100 000 population)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Estimated maternal deaths273.7Ranked 119th▼ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal deaths273.7Ranked 119th▼ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated mortality from all forms of tuberculosis per 100,000 population1Ranked 53rd▲ 4· 2024
- Estimated number of deaths from all forms of tuberculosis960Ranked 79th▼ 10· 2024
- Estimated number of deaths from all forms of tuberculosis960Ranked 79th▼ 10· 2024
- Estimated number of malaria cases2,034Ranked 67th—· 2024
- Estimated number of malaria deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Estimated number of malaria deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Estimated number of MDR/RR-TB incident cases200Ranked 58th▲ 1· 2024
- Estimated number of new cases of all forms of tuberculosis9,600Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2024
- Estimated number of people eligible for antiretroviral therapy according to 2010 guidelines28,000Ranked 40th· 2012
- Estimated number of road traffic deaths18,156Ranked 169th· 2021
- Estimated polio cases0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Estimated population-based prevalence of depression4.9Ranked 53rd· 2015
- Estimated road traffic death rate (per 100 000 population)20.6Ranked 110th· 2021
- Estimate of current cigarette smoking prevalence (%)6.2Ranked 91st▼ 7· 2030
- Estimate of current cigarette smoking prevalence (%) (age-standardized)5.8Ranked 101st▼ 2· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco smoking prevalence (%)7.2Ranked 109th▲ 3· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco smoking prevalence (%) (age-standardized)6.7Ranked 114th▲ 3· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%)11.3Ranked 94th▲ 6· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) (age-standardized)10.6Ranked 96th▲ 4· 2030
- Estimates of number of homicides2,535.2Ranked 150th—· 2019
- Estimates of rates of homicides per 100 000 population2.9Ranked 72nd—· 2021
- Ever breastfed97.4Ranked 12th· 2010
- Exclusive breastfeeding (% of children under 6 months)53.1Ranked 10th▼ 6· 2011
- Exclusive breastfeeding (% of children under 6 months)53.1%Ranked 10th▼ 6· 2011
- Exclusive breastfeeding under six months47.4Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2017
- Exclusive breastfeeding under six months (in thousands)364.6Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2017
- Expenditure on HIV prevention and treatment0Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2022
- Extensively drug-resistant0Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2019
- Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education (%)63%Ranked 35th· 2022
- External health expenditure (EXT) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)0.71Ranked 108th▼ 10· 2023
- External health expenditure (EXT) per capita in US$1.9Ranked 115th▼ 9· 2023
- External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)0.71Ranked 108th▼ 10· 2023
- External health expenditure per capita (current US$)1.9Ranked 115th▼ 9· 2023
- External health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)7.6Ranked 110th▼ 10· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth79.6Ranked 88th▼ 6· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth79.6Ranked 88th▼ 6· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth79.6Ranked 88th▼ 6· 2023
- Females563.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2021
- Females23.9Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2021
- Females42.8Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2021
- Females530.7Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2021
- Females266.7Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2021
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Financing70Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Food safety80Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Gender inequality index rank114Ranked 102nd▲ 8· 2014
- Generalist medical practitioners (number)100,661Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Geriatric-specific hospital beds (per 10,000 population)100Ranked 11th· 2017
- GN_FB_BNK_ACCSS90Ranked 11th▲ 5· 2021
- GN_IDX62.9Ranked 4th· 2023
- GN_IT_MOB_OWN72Ranked 17th—· 2021
- Government expenditures on mental health as a percentage of total government expenditures on health (%)3.6Ranked 29th· 2011
- Gross national income per capita (Atlas method)4,520Ranked 89th· 2010
- Health emergency management87Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Health services provision93Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Health worker density, by type of occupation (per 10,000 population) - Dentists5.3Ranked 20th▼ 37· 2023
- Health worker density, by type of occupation (per 10,000 population) - Pharmacists3.4Ranked 24th▼ 39· 2023
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at age 60 (years)14.8Ranked 63rd▼ 15· 2021
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years)64Ranked 70th▼ 7· 2021
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years) - Sex: both sexes64Ranked 70th▼ 7· 2021
- Heavy episodic drinking (youth 15 -19 years), drinkers only, past 30 days (%)25.1Ranked 174th▲ 29· 2019
- Heavy episodic drinking (youth 15 -19 years) past 30 days (%)0.1Ranked 180th▲ 45· 2019
- Height (Baten and Blum 2015)171.1Ranked 17th▼ 12· 2000
- Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Hepatitis, deaths caused by chronic hepatitis B and C (per 100 000 population)7.5Ranked 35th· 2022
- Hib (Hib3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- HIV-positive38Ranked 72nd▲ 4· 2024
- HIV-positive TB patients on ART (antiretroviral therapy) (%)93Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2024
- HIV-positive TB patients on CPT (co-trimoxazole preventive therapy) (%)20Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2014
- Homicide rate in both sexes in all ages per 100,000 population2.4Ranked 56th▼ 10· 2017
- Hospital beds (per 10 000 population)18.5Ranked 90th▲ 4· 2019
- Hospital beds (per 1,000 people)1.9Ranked 86th▲ 5· 2019
- Hospital beds (per 1,000 people)1.9Ranked 86th▲ 5· 2019
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for cigarette packaging?13Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for other smoked tobacco packaging?13Ranked 7th—· 2022
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for smokeless tobacco packaging?13Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2018
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, female (scale 0–50)47.4Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, male (scale 0–50)45.6Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, total (scale 0–50)46.5Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2025
- Human development index rank69Ranked 100th▲ 5· 2014
- Human height171.1Ranked 17th▼ 12· 2000
- Human resources80Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, age-standardized26.2Ranked 130th▲ 7· 2019
- Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude23.1Ranked 136th▼ 10· 2019
- Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%)58.9Ranked 67th▲ 4· 2019
- Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)56.5Ranked 71st▲ 4· 2019
- Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%)24.1Ranked 46th▼ 3· 2019
- Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)23.1Ranked 53rd▼ 1· 2019
- Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%)47.6Ranked 59th▼ 2· 2019
- Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)45.3Ranked 74th▼ 4· 2019
- ICD-11 implementation progress level3Ranked 1st· 2019
- ICT Development Index (IDI)3.8Ranked 88th▲ 2· 2012
- ICT Development Index (IDI) rank90Ranked 68th▼ 2· 2012
- IHR Coordination, National IHR Focal Point functions and advocacy93Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Ill-defined causes in cause-of-death registration (%)13.1Ranked 42nd· 2015
- IM_MCV298Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Immunization, DPT (% of children ages 12-23 months)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Immunization, HepB3 (% of one-year-old children)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Incidence of malaria (per 1,000 population at risk)2.2Ranked 20th▼ 5· 2024
- Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100 000 population) (HIV-positive cases)0.18Ranked 99th▲ 3· 2023
- Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100 000 population per year)10Ranked 105th▼ 2· 2024
- Incidence rate of lip and oral cavity cancer (per 100 000 population)1.3Ranked 47th· 2020
- Increase in mean male height (%)10.5%Ranked 1st· 1996
- Inequality in life expectancy0.08Ranked 78th▼ 3· 2023
- Inequality in life expectancy (Atkinson index)0.08Ranked 78th▼ 3· 2023
- Infant deaths11,969Ranked 138th—· 2024
- Infant mortality1Ranked 51st▼ 3· 2024
- Infant mortality rate0.97%Ranked 87th▲ 2· 2024
- Infant mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2024
- Infant mortality rate1%Ranked 83rd▲ 3· 2024
- Infant mortality rate0.99%Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2023
- Infants exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life (%)53.1Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2010
- Infection prevention and control (IPC)80Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- International Health Regulations (IHR) capacity, by type of IHR capacity (%)76Ranked 21st· 2024
- Introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods 6-8 months75.9Ranked 16th· 2010
- Invasive non-pneumonia, non-meningitis68Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2015
- Japanese encephalitis - number of reported cases0Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2024
- Knowledge about HIV prevention by young males20.6%Ranked 19th· 2012
- Knowledge about HIV prevention in young people18.3%Ranked 16th· 2012
- Laboratories providing drug susceptibility testing (DST) (per 5 million population)0.8Ranked 44th▼ 3· 2014
- Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using culture (per 5 million population)3.5Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2014
- Laboratories providing tuberculosis diagnostic services using sputum smear microscopy (per 100 000 population)0.5Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2014
- Laboratory96Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Latest year of wild polio case1,997Ranked 12th· 2023
- Leprosy - New leprosy cases with G2D rate per 1 000 000 population0.03Ranked 85th▲ 4· 2024
- Leprosy - Number of cases registered for treatment10Ranked 76th—· 2024
- Leprosy - Number of new leprosy cases among children (less than 15 years of age)0Ranked 41st▼ 2· 2024
- Leprosy registered prevalence rate per 1 000 000 population0.11Ranked 114th▲ 7· 2024
- Life expectancy74.8Ranked 63rd▲ 2· 2020
- Life expectancy77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at 153.8Ranked 165th▲ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at 1589.5Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2100
- Life expectancy at 452.7Ranked 180th—· 2023
- Life expectancy at 807.4Ranked 126th▼ 5· 2023
- Life expectancy at age 60 (years)19.9Ranked 59th▼ 19· 2021
- Life expectancy at birth3.8Ranked 171st▼ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth3.8Ranked 171st▼ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth3.8Ranked 171st▼ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth1.1Ranked 177th▲ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth75.8Ranked 60th▼ 6· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth79.6Ranked 88th▼ 6· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth89.3Ranked 57th—· 2100
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth1.1Ranked 177th▲ 1· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth (years)74.7Ranked 57th▼ 11· 2021
- Life expectancy at birth (years) - Sex: both sexes74.7Ranked 57th▼ 11· 2021
- Lifespan inequality0.09Ranked 68th▼ 4· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (%)0.02Ranked 60th—· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (%)0.02%Ranked 60th—· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (1 in: rate varies by country)4,179Ranked 128th▲ 4· 2023
- Lives saved due to ART1,752.8Ranked 57th▼ 10· 2024
- Long-run childhood stunting rates4.1%Ranked 103rd▼ 19· 2015
- Malaria incidence per 1,000 population at risk (per 1,000 population)2.2Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2024
- Male6.6Ranked 68th▼ 5· 2017
- Male life expectancy at birth75.8Ranked 60th▼ 6· 2023
- Male life expectancy at birth75.8Ranked 60th▼ 6· 2023
- Male-to-female height ratio1.1Ranked 20th▲ 1· 1996
- Male to female suicide death rate ratio2.3Ranked 45th▼ 7· 2021
- Maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2020
- Maternal mortality ratio (national estimate, per 100,000 live births)19.7Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2013
- Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)15.8Ranked 62nd▼ 1· 2023
- Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)15.8Ranked 62nd▼ 1· 2023
- Mean BMI (kg/m²)27Ranked 33rd—· 2016
- Mean BMI (kg/m²) (age-standardized estimate) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age25.2Ranked 40th—· 2016
- Mean female height (cm)159.7Ranked 85th▼ 1· 1996
- Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized1.2Ranked 5th—· 2018
- Mean HDL cholesterol, age-standardized - Sex: both sexes1.2Ranked 5th—· 2018
- Mean HDL cholesterol, crude1.2Ranked 5th—· 2018
- Mean hemoglobin level of children aged 6-59 months117Ranked 9th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years)128Ranked 8th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years)118Ranked 6th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years)127Ranked 9th—· 2019
- Mean male height (cm)173.6Ranked 64th—· 1996
- Mean male height (cm)173.6Ranked 64th—· 1996
- Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized3.2Ranked 10th—· 2018
- Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, age-standardized - Sex: both sexes3.2Ranked 10th—· 2018
- Mean Non-HDL cholesterol, crude3.2Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2018
- Mean total cholesterol, age-standardized4.4Ranked 9th—· 2018
- Mean total cholesterol, crude4.4Ranked 10th—· 2018
- Measles-containing-vaccine first-dose (MCV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) immunization coverage by the nationally recommended age (%)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Measles - number of reported cases1,072Ranked 38th▼ 21· 2025
- Measles - number of reported cases449Ranked 58th▲ 14· 2024
- Measles second-dose coverage99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Median availability of selected generic medicines (%) - Private96.7Ranked 3rd· 2013
- Median availability of selected generic medicines (%) - Public96.7Ranked 2nd· 2013
- Median consumer price ratio of selected generic medicines - Private1.3Ranked 28th· 2013
- Median consumer price ratio of selected generic medicines - Public1.3Ranked 17th· 2013
- Medical and Pathology Laboratory scientists (number)3,276Ranked 3rd· 2004
- Medical and Pathology Laboratory Technicians (number)7,930Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2006
- Medical doctors not further defined (number)90,470Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2015
- Medical doctors (number)164,086Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2023
- Medical doctors (per 10,000)18.1Ranked 67th▼ 18· 2023
- Men12.6Ranked 69th▼ 4· 2017
- Men1.3Ranked 153rd▲ 1· 2019
- Men37.5%Ranked 25th▲ 3· 2017
- Men173.6Ranked 64th—· 1996
- Men15%Ranked 105th▼ 6· 2021
- Men94.1Ranked 69th▼ 4· 2017
- Mental health day treatment facilities (per 100,000)0.28Ranked 7th· 2017
- Mental health outpatient facilities (per 100,000)5.1Ranked 2nd· 2017
- Mental health units in general hospitals admissions (per 100,000)43.7Ranked 46th· 2014
- Mental health units in general hospitals (per 100,000)0.2Ranked 10th· 2017
- Mental health units in general hospitals (per 100,000)0.2Ranked 10th· 2017
- Mental hospital admissions (per 100,000)117.6Ranked 36th· 2014
- Mental hospitals (per 100,000)0.05Ranked 11th· 2017
- MG_INTNL_MG_CNTRY_DEST3.84MRanked 17th▼ 5· 2024
- MG_RFGS_CNTRY_ASYLM_PER100018Ranked 24th▲ 15· 2025
- MG_RFGS_CNTRY_ASYLM_PER_USD_GNI18Ranked 24th▲ 15· 2025
- Midwifery personnel (number)77,531Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2023
- Minimum dietary diversity 6-23 months84Ranked 1st· 2017
- MNCH_CSEC50.1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2016
- MNCH_INSTDEL96.2Ranked 10th▼ 11· 2016
- MNCH_LIFE_EXPECTANCY77.5Ranked 65th· 2022
- MNCH_LTR_MATERNAL_DEATH4,179Ranked 128th▲ 4· 2023
- MNCH_MATERNAL_DEATHS185.9Ranked 97th▼ 5· 2023
- MNCH_MMR15.8Ranked 133rd▲ 1· 2023
- MNCH_UHC81Ranked 11th—· 2023
- MNCH_UHC_RMNCH78Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Mobile-cellular telephone subscriptions per 100 inhabitants76.1Ranked 121st· 2012
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70 (%)13.9%Ranked 38th▲ 5· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70 (%)13.9Ranked 38th▲ 5· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70, female (%)12.7Ranked 42nd▲ 5· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70, male (%)15Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2021
- Mortality rate among children ages 10 to 14 years (per 1000 children aged 10)1.7Ranked 103rd—· 2020
- Mortality rate attributed to exposure to unsafe WASH services (per 100 000 population) (SDG 3.9.2)2.9Ranked 16th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution, age-standardized, female (per 100,000 female population)52.3Ranked 75th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution, age-standardized, male (per 100,000 male population)64.2Ranked 67th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution, age-standardized (per 100,000 population)58.1Ranked 68th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female (per 100,000 female population)0.41Ranked 57th▲ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, male (per 100,000 male population)0.83Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100 000 population)0.62Ranked 105th▲ 3· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100,000 population)0.62Ranked 55th▲ 7· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population)0.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population) - Both sexes0.6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene from diarrhoea, intestinal nematode infections, malnutrition and acute respiratory infections (deaths per 100,000 population)2.9Ranked 46th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene (per 100,000 population)2.9Ranked 16th· 2019
- Mortality rate, neonatal (per 1,000 live births)7.2Ranked 50th—· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5, female (per 1,000 live births)10.7Ranked 59th▲ 5· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5, male (per 1,000 live births)11.9Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000 live births)11.3Ranked 55th▲ 3· 2024
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported180,000Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in PPP$6Ranked 81st▼ 47· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates4.3Ranked 60th▼ 68· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - ad valorem excise0.09Ranked 43rd▼ 3· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - import duties0Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - other taxes0.02Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - specific excise0Ranked 54th▼ 6· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - total tax0.16Ranked 62nd▼ 2· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - value added tax0.04Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2020
- Mumps - number of reported cases10,417Ranked 14th· 2000
- National smoking ban: NUMBER OF PLACES SMOKE-FREE8Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Natural population growth rate0.83%Ranked 108th—· 2023
- Neonatal deaths8,293Ranked 129th▼ 3· 2024
- Neonatal deaths9,145Ranked 140th▼ 8· 2019
- Neonatal deaths8,293Ranked 129th▼ 3· 2024
- Neonatal mortality rate0.72%Ranked 88th—· 2024
- Neonatal mortality rate (per 1000 live births) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 0-27 days0.74Ranked 86th—· 2023
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases0Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2025
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases per million0.01Ranked 43rd▼ 10· 2024
- Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%)97%Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Neonates protected at birth against neonatal tetanus (PAB) (%)97Ranked 4th—· 2022
- New and relapse cases85%Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Newborns protected against tetanus (%)97Ranked 4th—· 2024
- New cases: other0Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2012
- New cases: pulmonary smear-negative1,713Ranked 65th—· 2012
- New cases: pulmonary smear unknown/not done478Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2012
- New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)80Ranked 19th▼ 26· 2024
- New chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections (number)334Ranked 77th· 2022
- New chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infections (number)6,780Ranked 20th· 2022
- New HIV infections2,139.4Ranked 55th· 2024
- New leprosy case detection rate per 1 000 000 population0.12Ranked 112th—· 2024
- New leprosy child case detection rate (less than 15 years of age) per 1 000 000 child population0Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2024
- New or unknown treatment history cases: Pulmonary, bacteriologically confirmed4,771Ranked 68th▲ 4· 2023
- Non-HDL cholesterol3.2Ranked 10th—· 2018
- Non-polio AFP rate5.7Ranked 39th▼ 17· 2023
- NSP coverage among PWID per year (rate)80Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- NT_ANE_WOM_15_49_MOD25.5Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2023
- NT_ANT_HAZ_NE2_MOD4.8Ranked 130th—· 2024
- NT_ANT_HAZ_NE2_MOD_NUMTH290.4Ranked 60th▲ 3· 2024
- NT_ANT_WAZ_NE24.3Ranked 1st—· 2017
- NT_ANT_WHZ_NE30.9Ranked 1st—· 2017
- NT_ANT_WHZ_PO2_MOD2.7Ranked 140th▲ 1· 2024
- NT_ANT_WHZ_PO2_MOD_NUMTH164.9Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- NT_BF_EBF97.4Ranked 15th· 2010
- NT_BF_EIBF80.6Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2017
- NT_BF_EXBF47.4Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2017
- NT_CF_ISSSF_FL75.9Ranked 17th· 2010
- NT_CF_MDD84Ranked 1st· 2017
- NT_DANT_BMI_G25_MOD60.4Ranked 66th—· 2022
- NT_DANT_BMI_G30_MOD_ADJ24.3Ranked 76th▼ 3· 2022
- NT_DANT_BMI_L18_MOD3.5Ranked 94th▲ 5· 2022
- NT_IOD_ANY_TH93.5Ranked 4th· 2000
- NT_IOD_ANY_TS93.5Ranked 10th· 2000
- Number of biomedical engineers1Ranked 73rd· 2017
- Number of cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis reported5,441Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of cases of visceral leishmaniasis reported7Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2024
- Number of children aged 6-59 months with anaemia (thousands)2,006.7Ranked 28th—· 2019
- Number of children who die before age 513,851Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Number of children who die before age 513,851Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Number of children who die before age 513,851Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Number of clinical trials31Ranked 44th▲ 3· 2024
- Number of confirmed malaria cases7,601Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2024
- Number of current cigarette smokers, estimate4.58MRanked 30th▲ 3· 2030
- Number of current of tobacco users, estimate8.28MRanked 23rd▲ 1· 2030
- Number of current tobacco smokers, estimate5.34MRanked 30th▲ 3· 2030
- Number of daily smokers - both (IHME, GHDx (2012))7.08MRanked 24th—· 2012
- Number of deaths ages 10-14 years2,363Ranked 123rd—· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 15-19 years6,015Ranked 153rd▼ 1· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 20-24 years6,745Ranked 148th▼ 8· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 5-9 years2,269Ranked 111th▼ 9· 2024
- Number of deaths among children ages 10 to 14 years2,143Ranked 119th▲ 3· 2021
- Number of deaths due to tuberculosis, excluding HIV920Ranked 83rd▼ 2· 2024
- Number of deaths rate due to road traffic injuries18,156Ranked 169th· 2021
- Number of female leprosy new cases4Ranked 58th▼ 6· 2024
- Number of full-time equivalent staff in national agency20Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Number of imported cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis reported158Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2018
- Number of imported cases of visceral leishmaniasis reported0Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2018
- Number of imported malaria cases5,564Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2024
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases9,600Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2024
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases, (HIV-positive cases)140Ranked 66th▼ 7· 2024
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases in children aged 0 - 14300Ranked 74th· 2024
- Number of indigenous malaria cases2,034Ranked 66th—· 2024
- Number of indigenous P. falciparum malaria cases537Ranked 62nd▲ 1· 2024
- Number of indigenous P. vivax malaria cases1,469Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2024
- Number of infant deaths11,969Ranked 139th—· 2024
- Number of infant deaths - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 0 to 11 months12,578%Ranked 134th—· 2023
- Number of infants1.18MRanked 24th—· 2023
- Number of infants who die before age 11,070Ranked 56th—· 2100
- Number of infants who die before age 111,611Ranked 47th—· 2023
- Number of insecticide classes to which resistance was reported4Ranked 1st—· 2015
- Number of licensed qualified anaesthesiologists actively working1,421Ranked 13th· 2014
- Number of licensed qualified obstetricians actively working1,197Ranked 16th· 2014
- Number of licensed qualified surgeons actively working1,272Ranked 21st· 2014
- Number of malaria cases treated with any first line tx courses (including artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs))7,299Ranked 54th▲ 9· 2024
- Number of malaria cases treated with artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs)2,008Ranked 51st▲ 8· 2024
- Number of malaria positive cases by microscopy7,596Ranked 51st▲ 3· 2024
- Number of malaria positive cases by rapid diagnostic test (RDT)5Ranked 78th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of malaria suspects examined by microscopy494,506Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2024
- Number of malaria suspects examined by rapid diagnostic test (RDT)80,153Ranked 65th▼ 7· 2024
- Number of maternal deaths185.9Ranked 126th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of maternal deaths190Ranked 46th▼ 6· 2023
- Number of maternal deaths185.9Ranked 126th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of neonatal deaths8,293Ranked 129th▼ 3· 2024
- Number of neonatal deaths8,293Ranked 130th▼ 3· 2024
- Number of new cases of lip and oral cavity cancer1,139Ranked 36th· 2020
- Number of new G2D leprosy cases3Ranked 48th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of new HIV infections per 1,000 uninfected population, by sex and age (per 1,000 uninfected population)0.02Ranked 121st· 2024
- Number of new leprosy cases11Ranked 73rd▼ 4· 2024
- Number of new leprosy cases11Ranked 73rd▼ 4· 2024
- Number of new leprosy cases with G2D among children (less than 15 years of age)0Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of non-autochthonous leprosy cases2Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2024
- Number of one-year-olds who have not been vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae type b11,989.5Ranked 94th▲ 3· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not been vaccinated against rubella11,989.5Ranked 76th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the inactivated polio vaccine11,989.5Ranked 90th▲ 3· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the measles vaccine11,989.5Ranked 94th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the third dose of the polio vaccine11,989.5Ranked 95th▲ 1· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine11,989.5Ranked 95th▲ 3· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine11,989.5Ranked 97th▲ 3· 2023
- Number of people operated for trachomatous trichiasis590Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of people protected from malaria by indoor residual spraying (IRS)66,000Ranked 29th▲ 4· 2024
- Number of people requiring interventions against neglected tropical diseases (number)6,845Ranked 105th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of people who cannot afford a healthy diet12.8MRanked 32nd—· 2024
- Number of people who cannot afford nutrient adequacy6.6MRanked 39th· 2021
- Number of people who received treatment with antibiotics for trachoma0Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of pigs in the country0Ranked 161st· 2016
- Number of presumed malaria cases0Ranked 40th—· 2024
- Number of prevalent tuberculosis cases26,000Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2014
- Number of reported cases of cholera86Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2015
- Number of reported cases of poliomyelitis by wild poliovirus (WPV)0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Number of reported deaths from cholera1Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2015
- Number of smoke-free public places8Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Number of surgical procedures (per 100,000 population)802.7Ranked 12th· 2010
- Number of suspected malaria cases574,659Ranked 53rd—· 2024
- Number of under-five deaths13,192Ranked 130th▼ 7· 2024
- Number of under-five deaths13,192Ranked 131st▼ 7· 2024
- Number of underweight children326,019Ranked 10th▼ 8· 2017
- Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)2.9Ranked 47th▼ 68· 2023
- Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)2.9Ranked 47th▼ 68· 2023
- Nurses working in mental health sector (per 100,000)9.5Ranked 6th· 2017
- Nursing and midwifery personnel (number)260,567Ranked 18th▼ 10· 2023
- Nursing and midwifery personnel (per 10,000)28.8Ranked 83rd▼ 31· 2023
- Nursing personnel (number)183,036Ranked 23rd▼ 7· 2023
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age24.6%Ranked 84th—· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: female - Age group: 18+ years of age30.4%Ranked 76th▲ 2· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age18.8%Ranked 105th▼ 1· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age25.7%Ranked 91st—· 2024
- Obesity in men18.8%Ranked 105th▼ 1· 2024
- Opioids1,640.3Ranked 7th—· 2021
- Oral health interventions as part of health benefit packages: Coverage of the largest government health financing scheme (%)95Ranked 5th· 2021
- Out-of-pocket expenditure as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)43.1Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of current health expenditure)43.1Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of current health expenditure)43.1%Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) per capita in US$115.2Ranked 99th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita (current US$)115.2Ranked 99th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)459.1Ranked 75th▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)459.1Ranked 75th▼ 4· 2023
- Outpatient visits (per 100,000)2,647.1Ranked 31st· 2014
- Overall compliance with bans on direct advertising (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Overall compliance with bans on promotion and sponsorship (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Overall compliance with regulations on smoke-free environments (score)10Ranked 1st· 2022
- Overweight among children and adolescents, BMI-for-age > +1 standard deviations above the median (crude estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 5-19 years of age32.2%Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2024
- Overweight in men57.8%Ranked 92nd▼ 1· 2024
- Overweight numbers among children under 5 years of age (thousands), model-based estimates164.9Ranked 42nd—· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), model-based estimates2.7Ranked 79th▼ 5· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), model-based estimates - Sex: both sexes2.7%Ranked 79th▼ 5· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), survey-based estimates2.9Ranked 19th▲ 9· 2017
- Participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age) (%)48.9Ranked 90th▼ 3· 2016
- People living with chronic hepatitis B (HBV) (number)1.32MRanked 26th· 2022
- People living with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) including cured (all ages) (adjusted number)236,870Ranked 33rd· 2022
- People living with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) (number)205,380Ranked 36th· 2022
- People living with HIV diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C infection (percent)8.8Ranked 22nd· 2023
- People living with HIV who inject drugs, diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C infection (percent)34.4Ranked 9th· 2023
- People practicing open defecation (% of population)0.4Ranked 110th—· 2016
- People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population)1.4Ranked 88th▼ 3· 2016
- People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population)0Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)94.8Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2024
- People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of urban population)98.7Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2024
- People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural population)82.3Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2024
- People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban population)92.8Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2024
- People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population)94.4Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2024
- People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)88.1Ranked 11th—· 2024
- People using safely managed drinking water services, urban (% of urban population)96.2Ranked 17th—· 2024
- People using safely managed sanitation services, urban (% of urban population)75.3Ranked 40th—· 2024
- People who inject drugs: Population size estimates (number)90,000Ranked 4th· 2018
- Per capita availability of refined sugar (g/day)74.6Ranked 79th· 2019
- Per capita current health expenditure in PPP (oral health)868.2Ranked 89th· 2019
- Per capita expenditure on dental healthcare (US$)42.1Ranked 47th· 2019
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)70.6Ranked 22nd▲ 9· 2022
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)70.6%Ranked 22nd▲ 9· 2022
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)34.7Ranked 40th▲ 6· 2022
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)34.7%Ranked 39th▲ 6· 2022
- Percentage of individuals using the Internet26Ranked 105th· 2012
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of cigarette packaging50Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of other smoked tobacco packaging50Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of smokeless tobacco packaging50Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2018
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of cigarette packaging50Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of other smoked tobacco packaging50Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of smokeless tobacco packaging50Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2018
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of cigarette packaging50Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of other smoked tobacco packaging50Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of smokeless tobacco packaging50Ranked 9th—· 2018
- Percentage of sites for which carbamate resistance was reported43Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2015
- Percentage of sites for which organochlorine resistance was reported50Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2015
- Percentage of sites for which organophosphate resistance was reported20Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2015
- Percentage of sites for which pyrethroid resistance was reported45Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2015
- Persistence to last grade of primary (% of cohort)96Ranked 42nd▲ 9· 2016
- Persons initiated chronic hepatitis C(HCV) treatment (number)2,978Ranked 29th· 2022
- Persons on chronic hepatitis B (HBV) treatment (number)24,867Ranked 11th· 2022
- Persons on chronic hepatitis C (HCV) treatment, cumulative (number)33,148Ranked 21st· 2022
- Pertussis - number of reported cases490Ranked 40th▼ 26· 2025
- Pharmaceutical Technicians and Assistants (number)1,988Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2006
- Pharmacists (number)30,427Ranked 16th▼ 5· 2023
- Pharmacists (per 10,000)3.4Ranked 55th▼ 9· 2023
- Physicians (per 1,000 people)1.8Ranked 28th▼ 56· 2023
- Physiotherapists (number)3,580Ranked 19th▼ 23· 2006
- Pneumoccocal conjugate vaccines (PCV3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)54Ranked 40th▼ 7· 2025
- Points of entry (PoEs) and border health80Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Policy and legal instruments to implement IHR80%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2023
- Policy, Legal and normative Instruments to implement IHR80Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2023
- Poliomyelitis - number of reported cases0Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2018
- Polio (Pol3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Population73.97MRanked 17th· 2010
- Population in areas that warrant treatment with antibiotics, facial cleanliness and environmental improvement for elimination of trachoma as a public health problem0Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2025
- Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of population)1.5Ranked 1st· 2005
- Pregnant women attending antenatal care, tested for HBsAg (percent)45.6Ranked 13th· 2021
- Pregnant women attending antenatal care, tested positive for HBsAg (percent)0.4Ranked 17th· 2021
- Pregnant women receiving prenatal care (%)96.9Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2010
- Pregnant women receiving prenatal care (%)96.9%Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2010
- Pregnant women with anemia27.9%Ranked 78th▼ 4· 2023
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported200,000Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in international dollars6.7Ranked 90th· 2020
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates4.8Ranked 62nd· 2020
- Preterm birth (number)92,793Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2020
- Preterm birth rate (per 100 live births)7.5Ranked 61st—· 2020
- Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6-59 months (%)26.5Ranked 94th▲ 6· 2019
- Prevalence of anemia among children (% of children ages 6-59 months)26.5Ranked 94th▲ 6· 2019
- Prevalence of anemia among children (% of children ages 6-59 months)26.5%Ranked 94th▲ 6· 2019
- Prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women (% of women ages 15-49)25.5Ranked 80th▲ 2· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%)27.9Ranked 78th▼ 4· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%)27.9%Ranked 78th▼ 4· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49)25.5Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2023
- Prevalence of chronic hepatitis B (HBV) in the general population (%)1.5Ranked 62nd· 2022
- Prevalence of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) ) in the general population (%)0.2Ranked 27th· 2022
- Prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adolescents (%)3.4Ranked 15th· 2016
- Prevalence of current smokeless tobacco use among adolescents (%)1.9Ranked 11th· 2016
- Prevalence of current tobacco smoking among adolescents (%)9.2Ranked 6th· 2016
- Prevalence of current tobacco use among adolescents (%)10.2Ranked 10th· 2016
- Prevalence of current tobacco use, females (% of female adults)1.3Ranked 101st▼ 6· 2024
- Prevalence of current tobacco use, males (% of male adults)22.5Ranked 98th▲ 5· 2024
- Prevalence of edentulism in people 20+ years (%)6.9Ranked 110th· 2019
- Prevalence of hypertension in adults aged 30-7926.2Ranked 130th▲ 7· 2019
- Prevalence of night blindness (WHO (2009))4%Ranked 58th· 2005
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, female (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)2.5Ranked 78th▼ 3· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, female (% of children under 5)2.6Ranked 16th· 2017
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, male (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)2.9Ranked 82nd—· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, male (% of children under 5)3.3Ranked 17th· 2017
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)2.7Ranked 79th▼ 5· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height (% of children under 5)2.9Ranked 20th▲ 11· 2017
- Prevalence of severe periodontal disease in people 15+ year (%)18Ranked 116th· 2019
- Prevalence of severe wasting, weight for height, female (% of children under 5)0.6Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2017
- Prevalence of severe wasting, weight for height, male (% of children under 5)1.1Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2017
- Prevalence of severe wasting, weight for height (% of children under 5)0.9Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2017
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, female (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)4.6Ranked 112th▲ 4· 2024
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, female (% of children under 5)4.8Ranked 23rd▼ 13· 2017
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, male (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)5Ranked 113th—· 2024
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, male (% of children under 5)4.9Ranked 25th▼ 10· 2017
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)4.8Ranked 103rd▼ 2· 2024
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age (% of children under 5)4.8Ranked 24th▼ 13· 2017
- Prevalence of stunting, male (% of children under 5)4.9%Ranked 25th▼ 10· 2017
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age, female (% of children under 5)4.6Ranked 19th▼ 11· 2017
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age, male (% of children under 5)4Ranked 19th▼ 13· 2017
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age (% of children under 5)4.3Ranked 21st▼ 9· 2017
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age (% of children under 5)4.3%Ranked 21st▼ 9· 2017
- Prevalence of untreated caries of deciduous teeth in children 1-9 years (%)46.7Ranked 44th· 2019
- Prevalence of untreated caries of permanent teeth in people 5+ years (%)33.6Ranked 77th· 2019
- Prevalence of vitamin-A deficiency (WHO (2009))15.2%Ranked 50th· 2005
- Prevalence of vitamin-A deficiency (WHO (2017))0.5%Ranked 135th· 2005
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height, female (% of children under 5)4.1Ranked 15th▼ 9· 2017
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height, male (% of children under 5)4.4Ranked 16th▼ 8· 2017
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height (% of children under 5)4.3Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2017
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height (% of children under 5)4.3%Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2017
- Prevalence of zinc deficiency (Wessells et al. (2012))23.2%Ranked 36th▼ 18· 2005
- preventable deaths from rotavirus119Ranked 40th· 2016
- Preventive treatment17Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2022
- Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)89Ranked 12th▼ 18· 2024
- Primary data availability for UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1) (%)77Ranked 7th· 2023
- Private health expenditure per person559.3Ranked 75th▼ 4· 2023
- Probability of dying among adolescents ages 10-14 years (per 1,000)1.7Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2024
- Probability of dying among adolescents ages 15-19 years (per 1,000)4.7Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- Probability of dying among children ages 5-9 years (per 1,000)1.5Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Probability of dying among youth ages 20-24 years (per 1,000)5.8Ranked 59th▲ 4· 2024
- Production in 1000s hectolitres200Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2005
- Proportion of all cancer deaths among all individuals attributable to alcohol consumption0.3%Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of all cancers but non-melanoma skin cancer (c00-97, but c44) cases among all individuals attributable to helicobacter pylori7.2%Ranked 19th· 2020
- Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (%)99Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of births delivered in a health facility (Facility births) (%)95.3Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2010
- Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (%)72.1Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (%)34.4Ranked 43rd▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of children at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics (%)63.3Ranked 49th▲ 20· 2015
- Proportion of children in grades 2/3 achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics (%)65.2Ranked 31st▲ 5· 2015
- Proportion of children moderately or severely overweight (%) - Both sexes2.7%Ranked 78th▼ 5· 2024
- Proportion of population below the international poverty line of US$1.90 per day (%)0.3Ranked 4th—· 2016
- Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to out-of-pocket health expenditure (%)15.7Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2022
- Proportion of population facing impoverishing out-of-pocket health expenditure, based on the societal poverty line (%)11.3Ranked 16th▼ 7· 2022
- Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) out-of-pocket health expenditure (%)4.4Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2022
- Proportion of population further impoverished due to out-of-pocket health expenditure, based on the societal poverty line (%)9.4Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2022
- Proportion of population pushed into poverty (based on the societal poverty line) due to out-of-pocket health expenditure (%)1.9Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2022
- Proportion of population with large household expenditures on health (greater than 10%) as a share of total household expenditure or income (%)15.4%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of population with large household expenditures on health (greater than 25%) as a share of total household expenditure or income (%)3.7%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household expenditure on health exceeding 40% of household discretionary budget, by location, quintile, type of household and characteristics of the head of household (%)15.7Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2022
- Proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3) vaccine (%)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of the target population who received a 3rd dose of pneumococcal conjugate (PCV3) vaccine (%)0Ranked 48th· 2024
- Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Psychiatrists working in mental health sector (per 100,000)2Ranked 10th· 2017
- Psychologists working in mental health sector (per 100,000)5.2Ranked 4th· 2017
- PT_ADLT_PS_NEC18.2Ranked 1st· 2010
- PT_F_TMRD152.3MRanked 9th· 2023
- PT_F_TMRD1810.4MRanked 9th· 2023
- Public expenditure on health per capita (current international $)497.2Ranked 103rd—· 2023
- PV_VMIR0.67Ranked 13th· 2016
- Radiation emergencies60Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Raised fasting blood glucose (>=7.0 mmol/L) (age-standardized estimate) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age12.1Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2014
- Reported cases of guinea worm disease in humans0Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Reported cases of urethral discharge among men (number)6,150Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2023
- Reported cholera cases1Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2020
- Reported cholera deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Reported number of children receiving antiretroviral therapy, month and year of report0Ranked 1st· 2009
- Reported number of human rabies deaths20Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Reported number of human rabies deaths20Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Reported number of people requiring interventions against NTDs6,845Ranked 105th▼ 2· 2024
- Reported number of people requiring interventions against NTDs6,845Ranked 105th▼ 2· 2024
- Reported Smallpox cases (WHO)0Ranked 3rd—· 1977
- Reported Smallpox cases (WHO)0Ranked 3rd—· 1977
- Retreatment cases: other243Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2012
- Retreatment cases: treatment after default (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive)39Ranked 71st▲ 3· 2012
- Retreatment cases: treatment after failure (pulmonary smear and/or culture positive)159Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2012
- Rheumatic heart disease903.3Ranked 25th—· 2021
- Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE)80Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)43.7Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Risk of impoverishing expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)29.8%Ranked 47th▼ 3· 2022
- Risk of impoverishing expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)29.8Ranked 47th▼ 3· 2022
- Rotavirus vaccines completed dose (RotaC) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)57Ranked 39th▼ 14· 2025
- Rubella - number of reported cases14Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2025
- Sales of beer in 1000s hectolitres150Ranked 55th▲ 4· 2002
- School life expectancy in primary education, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 54th▲ 15· 2023
- SDG 3.9.2 WASH deaths2,422Ranked 111th· 2019
- SDG 6.3.1 Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)26.4Ranked 94th▼ 1· 2024
- Self-reported life satisfaction5.2Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2025
- Service Capacity Index for Substance Use Disorders (SCI-SUD)52.8Ranked 35th· 2019
- Severe wasted prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height <-3 SD), survey-based estimates0.9Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2017
- Sex workers: Condom use (percent)60.5Ranked 15th▼ 17· 2020
- Sex workers: Population size estimate (number)138,000Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2018
- Sex workers: Syphilis prevalence (percent)0Ranked 23rd· 2020
- Share of adult men that are overweight59.5%Ranked 90th—· 2024
- Share of adults12.5%Ranked 97th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age61.4%Ranked 68th▼ 2· 2024
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: female - Age group: 18+ years of age65%Ranked 61st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age57.8%Ranked 92nd▼ 1· 2024
- Share of adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)12.5%Ranked 97th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of children fully vaccinated against measles99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of children fully vaccinated against measles99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of children who are stunted4.8%Ranked 24th▼ 13· 2017
- Share of children with an active hepatitis B infection0.02%Ranked 125th· 2015
- Share of female adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)1.6%Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2022
- Share of male adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)23.5%Ranked 93rd▲ 2· 2022
- Share of men23.5%Ranked 93rd▲ 2· 2022
- Share of mothers aged 20-44 who have lost an infant4.1Ranked 26th· 2016
- Share of new all cancers but non-melanoma skin cancer (c00-97, but c44) cases among all individuals attributable to all infectious agents11%Ranked 104th· 2020
- Share of newborns vaccinated against tuberculosis99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae type b98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against rotavirus2%Ranked 50th· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against rubella99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had one dose of the measles vaccine99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had one dose of the measles vaccine99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the one dose of the inactivated polio vaccine99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine0%Ranked 48th· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine0%Ranked 48th· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the polio vaccine99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of population covered by health insurance90%Ranked 2nd· 2005
- Share of population covered by health insurance (ILO (2014))90%Ranked 2nd· 2005
- Share of the population who cannot afford a healthy diet14%Ranked 80th▼ 6· 2024
- Share of the population who cannot afford nutrient adequacy7.5%Ranked 90th· 2021
- Share of the target elderly population vaccinated against influenza2.5%Ranked 69th· 2020
- Share of total deaths in both sexes in those aged all ages that are from ill-defined diseases4.6%Ranked 62nd—· 2017
- Share that agrees vaccines are effective88%Ranked 11th· 2015
- Share that agrees vaccines are important for children99%Ranked 2nd· 2015
- Share that agrees vaccines are safe69%Ranked 26th· 2015
- Share that disagrees vaccines are safe24%Ranked 6th· 2015
- Share that disagree that vaccines are effective8%Ranked 13th· 2015
- Share that disagree that vaccines are important for children to have0%Ranked 17th· 2015
- Share who are stunted4.8%Ranked 24th▼ 13· 2017
- Skilled health professionals density (per 10 000 population)30.4Ranked 58th· 2014
- Smear-positive tuberculosis case-detection rate (%)78Ranked 23rd▼ 15· 2008
- Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%)85Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2011
- Social workers working in mental health sector (per 100,000)1.5Ranked 5th· 2017
- Specialist medical practitioners (number)63,425Ranked 14th▼ 5· 2023
- Specialist surgical workforce (per 100,000 population)5Ranked 82nd· 2014
- Spirits, recorded per capita (15+) consumption (in litres of pure alcohol) 0Ranked 173rd▼ 2· 2022
- SPP_CHLD_SOC_PROT86.9Ranked 6th· 2024
- SPP_GDPPC4,502.5Ranked 137th· 2024
- SPP_GINI34.8Ranked 49th· 2024
- SPP_HSLD_INCOME_SHARE7.2Ranked 30th· 2024
- SPP_MOTHERS_CASH_BNF20.4Ranked 70th▲ 22· 2024
- SPP_PALMA1.4Ranked 70th· 2024
- SPP_VMI0.67Ranked 13th· 2016
- Stillbirth rate0.54%Ranked 124th—· 2023
- Stillbirth rate (per 1000 total births)5.4Ranked 124th—· 2023
- Stunting numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates290.4Ranked 60th▲ 4· 2024
- Stunting numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates - Sex: both sexes290,400Ranked 60th▲ 4· 2024
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), model-based estimates4.8Ranked 103rd▼ 2· 2024
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates4.8Ranked 24th▼ 13· 2017
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates - Sex: both sexes4.8%Ranked 24th▼ 13· 2017
- Suicide mortality rate, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population)4.1Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2021
- Suicide mortality rate, female (per 100,000 female population)2.3Ranked 51st▲ 17· 2021
- Suicide mortality rate, male (per 100,000 male population)5.8Ranked 40th▲ 5· 2021
- Suicide rate4Ranked 151st▼ 8· 2021
- Support to help quit smoking5Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Surveillance100Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Tax structure: Excise tax proportion of price0Ranked 167th▲ 18· 2022
- TB patients with known HIV status (%)98Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2024
- Tested TB patients HIV-positive (%)1.5Ranked 62nd▼ 4· 2024
- Testing and counselling facilities, estimated number per 100 000 adult population2Ranked 35th· 2014
- Testing and counselling facilities, reported number1,017Ranked 35th· 2014
- Tobacco tax revenues - import duties0Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2022
- Tobacco tax revenues - other0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Tobacco tax structure: Price dispersion: Share of cheapest brand price in premium brand price (%) (the higher the % the smaller the gap)8.5Ranked 131st· 2022
- Total alcohol consumption per capita0.51Ranked 152nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total alcohol consumption per capita, female (liters of pure alcohol, projected estimates, female 15+ years of age)0.1Ranked 138th▼ 4· 2020
- Total alcohol consumption per capita (liters of pure alcohol, projected estimates, 15+ years of age)0.51Ranked 152nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total alcohol consumption per capita, male (liters of pure alcohol, projected estimates, male 15+ years of age)0.9Ranked 153rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total deaths from alcohol use disorders among both sexes124.8Ranked 99th▲ 8· 2021
- Total deaths from all causes among both sexes518,663.3Ranked 167th—· 2021
- Total deaths from alzheimer disease and other dementias among both sexes11,226.5Ranked 170th—· 2021
- Total deaths from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes137,297.6Ranked 169th—· 2021
- Total deaths from cardiovascular diseases among both sexes137,297.6Ranked 169th—· 2021
- Total deaths from dengue among both sexes0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Total deaths from diabetes mellitus among both sexes12,497.8Ranked 171st▲ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from diarrhoeal diseases among both sexes486.1Ranked 110th—· 2021
- Total deaths from drowning among both sexes715.6Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from drug use disorders among both sexes2,688.6Ranked 178th▼ 1· 2021
- Total deaths from falls among both sexes2,210.7Ranked 157th—· 2021
- Total deaths from fire, heat and hot substances among both sexes1,422.9Ranked 176th▲ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from HIV/AIDS among both sexes2,372.7Ranked 139th▲ 3· 2021
- Total deaths from lower respiratory infections among both sexes7,755Ranked 136th—· 2021
- Total deaths from malaria among both sexes0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Total deaths from malignant neoplasms among both sexes87,463Ranked 170th▼ 8· 2021
- Total deaths from meningitis among both sexes400.3Ranked 138th▲ 4· 2021
- Total deaths from mental and substance use disorders among both sexes2,813.5Ranked 179th▲ 3· 2021
- Total deaths from parkinson disease among both sexes1,851.5Ranked 167th▼ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from poisonings among both sexes546.6Ranked 171st▲ 5· 2021
- Total deaths from road injury among both sexes18,156Ranked 170th—· 2021
- Total deaths from self-harm among both sexes3,544.7Ranked 165th▲ 3· 2021
- Total deaths from stroke among both sexes33,963Ranked 165th—· 2021
- Total deaths from substance use disorders among both sexes2,813.4Ranked 179th▲ 2· 2021
- Total deaths from tuberculosis among both sexes969.5Ranked 118th▼ 1· 2021
- Total density per million population: Linear Accelerator0.54Ranked 69th▼ 24· 2013
- Total density per million population: Radiotherapy units1.6Ranked 81st▲ 4· 2021
- Total density per million population: Telecobalt Unit0.31Ranked 51st▲ 6· 2013
- Total expenditure on dental healthcare in million (US$)3,507.1Ranked 15th· 2019
- Total net official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors per capita (constant 2014 US$), by recipient0.06Ranked 125th· 2014
- Total net official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors per capita (US$), by recipient country0.02Ranked 129th· 2023
- Total number of malaria cases (presumed + confirmed cases)7,601Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2024
- Total number of national DHS surveys conducted0Ranked 14th· 2025
- Total number of notified TB cases10,395Ranked 54th▲ 1· 2014
- Total number of psychiatrists per 100,000 population2Ranked 7th· 2020
- Total number of RCTs published in high ranked medical journals21Ranked 68th· 2017
- Total official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors, gross disbursement, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)2.3Ranked 112th▼ 16· 2024
- Total official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors, net disbursement, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)1.45MRanked 122nd▲ 70· 2023
- Total official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors, net disbursement, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)2.3Ranked 105th▼ 20· 2024
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases per million0Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2023
- Total population in thousands (oral health)87,290.2Ranked 17th· 2020
- Total productivity losses due to 5 oral diseases in million (US$)1,798.8Ranked 27th· 2019
- Total (recorded+unrecorded) alcohol per capita (15+) consumption1Ranked 46th· 2016
- Total tetanus - number of reported cases7Ranked 46th▼ 5· 2025
- Total use of antibacterials expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day65.5Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Traditional and Complementary Medicine Professionals (number)1,007Ranked 5th· 2006
- Transgender: Condom use (percent)64.6Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2022
- Transgender: Population size estimate (number)10,000Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Transgender: Syphilis prevalence (percent)0Ranked 13th· 2022
- Treatment success rate for patients treated for MDR-TB (%)72Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2022
- Treatment success rate: HIV-positive TB cases75Ranked 20th▼ 7· 2023
- Treatment success rate: new TB cases85Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Treatment success rate: previously treated TB cases65Ranked 31st▲ 13· 2023
- Treatment success rate: XDR-TB cases0Ranked 30th▲ 13· 2020
- TRGT_2030_NT_ANE_WOM_15_49_MOD10.4Ranked 89th· 2030
- TRGT_2030_NT_ANT_HAZ_NE2_MOD4.2Ranked 135th· 2030
- Trust doctors and nurses in this country92.7%Ranked 23rd· 2020
- Tuberculosis case detection rate (%, all forms)73Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence attributed to HIV infection in males and females140Ranked 66th· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence (per 100,000 population)10Ranked 107th▼ 2· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence rate in males and females aged 0-4 years2Ranked 137th· 2024
- Tuberculosis - new and relapse cases7,033Ranked 71st▲ 1· 2024
- Tuberculosis - new and relapse cases10,980Ranked 53rd▼ 1· 2011
- Tuberculosis patients living with HIV receiving ART110Ranked 76th▲ 5· 2021
- Tuberculosis patients who tested positive for HIV120Ranked 78th▲ 4· 2021
- Tuberculosis-related deaths among people living with HIV87Ranked 38th▲ 3· 2023
- Tuberculosis treatment coverage73Ranked 26th—· 2024
- Tuberculosis treatment success rate (% of new cases)85Ranked 14th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage index81Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage index81Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage index81Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1)81Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1)81Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on infectious diseases90Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on infectious diseases90Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on non-communicable diseases71Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on noncommunicable diseases71Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health78Ranked 15th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health78Ranked 15th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access86Ranked 15th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on service capacity and access86Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Under 1s8.4Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2017
- Under 1s23.3Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2017
- Under 1s30.9Ranked 37th▼ 4· 2017
- Under 1s27.4Ranked 10th—· 2017
- Under-fifteen deaths17,824Ranked 138th▼ 5· 2024
- Under-fifteen mortality rate1.4%Ranked 82nd▲ 3· 2024
- Under-five deaths13,192Ranked 130th▼ 7· 2024
- Under-five probability of death1.1%Ranked 47th▼ 8· 2019
- Underweight3.1%Ranked 71st▲ 7· 2014
- Underweight2.9%Ranked 67th▲ 2· 2014
- Underweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates4.3Ranked 21st▼ 9· 2017
- Universal health coverage (UHC) service coverage index, 2025 methodology81Ranked 11th—· 2023
- UV radiation4,038Ranked 110th· 2004
- UV radiation attributable DALYs ('000)29,026Ranked 14th· 2002
- UV radiation attributable DALYs per 100'000 capita41.5Ranked 78th· 2002
- UV radiation attributable deaths697.1Ranked 165th· 2002
- UV radiation attributable deaths per 100'000 capita1Ranked 66th· 2002
- Vaccine-derived poliovirus cases0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- "Vaccines are important for children"99%Ranked 2nd· 2015
- Wasted numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates326,020Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2017
- Wasted numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates326Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2017
- Wasting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height <-2 SD), survey-based estimates4.3Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2017
- Wild Poliovirus cases0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Women240.2Ranked 15th▼ 9· 2017
- Women6.1Ranked 61st▼ 5· 2017
- Women accessing antenatal care (ANC) services who were tested for syphilis (%), reported74.6Ranked 40th▲ 6· 2024
- Women's share of population ages 15+ living with HIV (%)24.1Ranked 127th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_HCF_C-B62Ranked 6th—· 2023
- WS_HCF_C-L30.5Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_C-N7.5Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2023
- WS_HCF_H-B93Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_H-L4.6Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2023
- WS_HCF_H-N2.4Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_S-B21.7Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2023
- WS_HCF_S-L62Ranked 24th▼ 6· 2023
- WS_HCF_S-N16.3Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- WS_HCF_W-B88.1Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_W-L10Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2023
- WS_HCF_WM-B51.6Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_WM-L44.2Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2023
- WS_HCF_WM-N4.2Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2023
- WS_HCF_W-N1.9Ranked 50th▼ 5· 2023
- WS_PPL_S-ALB90.5Ranked 97th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-I100Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-L9.5Ranked 56th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-LAT57.3Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-OD0.4Ranked 110th—· 2016
- WS_PPL_S-SEP1.2Ranked 163rd▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-SEW41.5Ranked 91st▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-UI0Ranked 158th▼ 12· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-WWT25.3Ranked 73rd▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-ALB97.9Ranked 66th▼ 5· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-B3.4Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-I99.7Ranked 44th▼ 4· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-L1.9Ranked 81st—· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-NP0.4Ranked 135th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-P99.3Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-PRE94.4Ranked 71st—· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-QUA97.1Ranked 45th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-SM94.4Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-SW0.06Ranked 85th▼ 4· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-UI0.19Ranked 127th▲ 6· 2024
- WS_SCH_H-F96.9Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- WS_SCH_H-N3.1Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2022
- Year-on-year change in female height (%)0.03Ranked 35th—· 1996
- Year-on-year change in male height (%)0.01Ranked 57th▲ 1· 1996
- Yellow fever - number of reported cases0Ranked 18th▲ 6· 2025
- Zoonotic diseases80Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Stunting prevalence (under 5)4.8%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2017
- Wasting prevalence (under 5)4.3%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2017
- Overweight prevalence (under 5)2.9%Ranked 1st· 2017
- DTP3 immunization coverage98%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Measles (MCV1) immunization coverage99%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Under-5 mortality rate11.3Ranked 83rd▲ 4· 2024
Education
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2100UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2100Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2100
Secondary enrollment
- Secondary enrollment85.1%Ranked 104th▲ 1· 2023
- Education spending2.8%Ranked 88th▼ 44· 2023
- Adult literacy88.9%Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2023
- Primary enrollment102%Ranked 65th▼ 9· 2023
- Tertiary enrollment58.7%Ranked 56th▼ 10· 2022
- Primary completion rate97.4%Ranked 54th▼ 5· 2023
- Expected years of schooling14Ranked 88th▼ 1· 2023
- Mean years of schooling10.8Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, primary education or less (% of population ages 15+)83.6Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, secondary education or more (% of population ages 15+)94.1Ranked 37th▼ 6· 2024
- Adjusted gender parity index for participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age), (ratio)1Ranked 26th▼ 13· 2020
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary, female (% of primary school age children)97.6Ranked 18th▼ 7· 2012
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary, male (% of primary school age children)98.4Ranked 5th▼ 15· 2012
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary (% of primary school age children)99.8Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2017
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 26th▼ 13· 2020
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (%)59.8%Ranked 110th▲ 4· 2020
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, female (%)60.8%Ranked 101st▲ 8· 2020
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, male (%)58.9%Ranked 103rd▲ 9· 2020
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of lower secondary education in mathematics (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of lower secondary education in reading (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of primary in mathematics (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of primary in reading (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally representative learning assessment in Grade 2 or 3 in mathematics (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally representative learning assessment in Grade 2 or 3 in reading (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Adolescents out of school, female (% of female lower secondary school age)7.2Ranked 55th▲ 12· 2023
- Adolescents out of school, male (% of male lower secondary school age)7.9Ranked 54th▲ 1· 2023
- Adolescents out of school (% of lower secondary school age)7.6Ranked 59th▲ 13· 2023
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, both sexes (number)9.11MRanked 4th—· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, % female66Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, female (number)6MRanked 4th▼ 1· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, male (number)3.11MRanked 3rd▼ 2· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, both sexes (number)4.2MRanked 5th▼ 4· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, % female64Ranked 9th—· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, female (number)2.7MRanked 5th▼ 2· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, male (number)1.5MRanked 6th▼ 3· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, both sexes (number)4.91MRanked 3rd▼ 1· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, % female67Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, female (number)3.3MRanked 3rd▼ 1· 2016
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, male (number)1.61MRanked 3rd▼ 1· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, adjusted gender parity index (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (GPIA)0.92Ranked 9th· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.83Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, both sexes (%)88.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, both sexes (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)89.9%Ranked 13th· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, female (%)85.1%Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2023
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.78Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, female (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)86.2%Ranked 14th· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, male (%)92.8%Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.87Ranked 15th▲ 5· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, male (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)93.5%Ranked 10th· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.82Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, both sexes (%)73.9%Ranked 27th▲ 5· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, female (%)66.5%Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, male (%)81.6%Ranked 27th▲ 8· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, both sexes (%)89.5%Ranked 32nd▲ 6· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, female (%)85.8%Ranked 32nd▲ 7· 2016
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, male (%)93.3%Ranked 30th▲ 6· 2016
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%)88.6%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)49.3%Ranked 23rd▼ 5· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)58.5%Ranked 53rd▲ 1· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%)85%Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)85.2%Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%)88.7%Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)86.7%Ranked 5th▼ 8· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)88.8%Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2022
- All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in public institutions85.2%Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2022
- Average years of schooling10.8Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Average years of schooling10.8Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Average years of schooling9.8Ranked 62nd▼ 5· 2020
- Average years of schooling10.8Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Average years of schooling11.9Ranked 43rd▼ 8· 2040
- Average years of schooling, adjusted gender parity index0.99Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2016
- Average years of schooling among men10.8Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%)8.9%Ranked 26th▼ 5· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)10.5%Ranked 13th▼ 7· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)2.1%Ranked 49th▼ 3· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%)12.1%Ranked 16th▼ 15· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)10.1%Ranked 21st▼ 16· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%)9.1%Ranked 26th▼ 8· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)8.3%Ranked 36th▲ 11· 2022
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in upper-secondary public institutions (%)9.4%Ranked 20th▼ 13· 2022
- Children (13-15) who reported being in a physical fight during past year34.9%Ranked 57th· 2015
- Children out of school, female (% of female primary school age)1.5Ranked 82nd▼ 7· 2020
- Children out of school, male (% of male primary school age)2.1Ranked 74th▼ 3· 2020
- Children out of school (% of primary school age)0.1Ranked 140th▲ 9· 2023
- Children out of school, primary9,163Ranked 81st▲ 24· 2023
- Children out of school, primary, female60,444Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2020
- Children out of school, primary, male91,080Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2020
- Completion rate in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 79th▲ 4· 2025
- Completion rate in primary education96.7%Ranked 62nd▼ 8· 2025
- Completion rate in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 79th—· 2025
- Completion rate in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1Ranked 79th▲ 4· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)92.1%Ranked 70th▼ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, female (modelled data) (%)93.1%Ranked 75th▼ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, male (modelled data) (%)91.1%Ranked 70th—· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1Ranked 79th—· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)96.7%Ranked 62nd▼ 8· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, female (modelled data) (%)97.1%Ranked 94th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, male (modelled data) (%)96.4%Ranked 85th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.2Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)75.5%Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, female (modelled data) (%)83%Ranked 61st▼ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, male (modelled data) (%)68.4%Ranked 69th—· 2025
- Compulsory education, duration (years)9Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Contraception usage57%Ranked 11th▲ 7· 2010
- Current education expenditure, primary (% of total expenditure in primary public institutions)87.9Ranked 51st▲ 11· 2022
- Current education expenditure, secondary (% of total expenditure in secondary public institutions)90.9Ranked 42nd▲ 5· 2022
- Current education expenditure, tertiary (% of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions)91.7Ranked 33rd▼ 14· 2022
- Current education expenditure, total (% of total expenditure in public institutions)89.9Ranked 46th▲ 13· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%)91.1%Ranked 37th▲ 4· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)89.5%Ranked 20th▲ 6· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)97.9%Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%)87.9%Ranked 51st▲ 11· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)89.9%Ranked 46th▲ 13· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%)90.9%Ranked 42nd▲ 5· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)91.7%Ranked 33rd▼ 14· 2022
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in upper-secondary public institutions (%)90.6%Ranked 45th▲ 9· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%)2.5%Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)40.1%Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)39.4%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%)2.9%Ranked 66th—· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)4.7%Ranked 65th▲ 3· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%)2.2%Ranked 64th—· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)5%Ranked 61st▲ 3· 2022
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)1.8%Ranked 63rd▲ 4· 2022
- DEC alternative conversion factor (LCU per US$)452,865Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Duration of compulsory education9Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Duration of compulsory education (years)9Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Duration of pre-primary education1Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)17Ranked 53rd▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)18.9Ranked 45th▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)17.9Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)60Ranked 66th▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)70.3Ranked 56th▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)65.1Ranked 61st▼ 9· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)43.2Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)48.2Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)45.7Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, female (%) (cumulative)82.4Ranked 68th▼ 5· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, male (%) (cumulative)91.4Ranked 58th▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, total (%) (cumulative)86.9Ranked 64th▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)20.7Ranked 51st▼ 9· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)24.3Ranked 34th▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)22.5Ranked 43rd▼ 11· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)43.2Ranked 64th▼ 16· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)48.2Ranked 63rd▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)45.7Ranked 63rd▼ 12· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)3.4Ranked 45th▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)5.1Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2023
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)4.3Ranked 43rd▼ 2· 2023
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 44th▼ 6· 2023
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, both sexes (%)86.9%Ranked 42nd▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, female (%)82.5%Ranked 43rd▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, male (%)91.4%Ranked 42nd▼ 5· 2023
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)0.25Ranked 39th▼ 6· 2023
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)0.44Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)0.34Ranked 40th▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 60th▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.3Ranked 45th▲ 6· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)17.9%Ranked 50th▼ 4· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)17%Ranked 54th▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.29Ranked 45th▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)18.9%Ranked 46th▼ 2· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.31Ranked 45th▲ 5· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)6.3%Ranked 41st—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)6.2%Ranked 40th▲ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)6.4%Ranked 42nd—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)21.3%Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)21.7%Ranked 33rd—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)21%Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 39th▼ 12· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.06Ranked 31st▼ 6· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)0.34%Ranked 41st▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, female (%)0.25%Ranked 40th▼ 5· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.05Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, male (%)0.44%Ranked 39th▼ 6· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.07Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.47Ranked 19th▼ 12· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)0.03%Ranked 30th▼ 7· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)0.02%Ranked 27th▼ 6· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)0.04%Ranked 29th▼ 8· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 12th▼ 13· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)0.46%Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)0.37%Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)0.54%Ranked 32nd▼ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 72nd▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.64Ranked 42nd▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)65.1%Ranked 62nd▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)60%Ranked 67th▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.58Ranked 45th▲ 5· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)70.3%Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.69Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 51st▲ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)48.5%Ranked 42nd▲ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)43%Ranked 43rd▲ 5· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)53.1%Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)75.5%Ranked 40th—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)73.5%Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)77.3%Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.68Ranked 61st▼ 6· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.18Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)4.3%Ranked 43rd▼ 2· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)3.4%Ranked 46th▼ 2· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.17Ranked 45th▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)5.1%Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.18Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.74Ranked 45th▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)0.96%Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)0.8%Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)1.1%Ranked 39th▼ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.77Ranked 42nd▲ 9· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)5.4%Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)4.7%Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)6%Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.29Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)45.7%Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)43.2%Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.28Ranked 19th▼ 4· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)48.2%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.3Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.84Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)7.3%Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)6.6%Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)7.8%Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)25.1%Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)24.1%Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)25.9%Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2013
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 70th▼ 6· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)86.9%Ranked 64th▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)82.4%Ranked 68th▼ 5· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)91.4%Ranked 58th▼ 3· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 67th▼ 12· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.31Ranked 47th—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)22.5%Ranked 43rd▼ 11· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)20.7%Ranked 51st▼ 9· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.29Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)24.3%Ranked 34th▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.33Ranked 43rd—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 51st▼ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)8.4%Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)7.8%Ranked 42nd—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)8.8%Ranked 39th▼ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)27%Ranked 30th▼ 5· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)26.7%Ranked 29th▼ 7· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)27.2%Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 69th▼ 8· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.44Ranked 54th—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)45.7%Ranked 64th▼ 11· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)43.2%Ranked 65th▼ 15· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.41Ranked 55th▲ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)48.2%Ranked 64th▼ 7· 2023
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.47Ranked 54th▼ 2· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 48th▲ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)24.1%Ranked 51st▲ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)22.5%Ranked 54th▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)25.3%Ranked 53rd▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)54.8%Ranked 48th—· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)55.5%Ranked 47th▲ 3· 2016
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)54.2%Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity index (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (GPIA)0.57Ranked 13th· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2023
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.29Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, both sexes (%)49.8%Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, both sexes (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)53.6%Ranked 19th· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female (%)37.1%Ranked 30th▼ 5· 2023
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.13Ranked 31st▲ 7· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)39.1%Ranked 18th· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, male (%)64.1%Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2023
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.39Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, male (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)68.9%Ranked 17th· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.19Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, both sexes (%)13.7%Ranked 38th▲ 4· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, female (%)4.5%Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, male (%)23.7%Ranked 38th▲ 5· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.54Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, both sexes (%)46.7%Ranked 37th▲ 5· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, female (%)33.5%Ranked 38th▲ 7· 2016
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, male (%)61.5%Ranked 38th▲ 4· 2016
- End month of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non-tertiary education)6Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2025
- End month of the academic school year (tertiary education)6Ranked 6th—· 2022
- End of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non tertiary education)2,025Ranked 1st—· 2025
- End of the academic school year (tertiary education)2,022Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Enrolment in early childhood education, both sexes (number)1.02MRanked 32nd▲ 4· 2020
- Enrolment in early childhood education, female (number)505,053Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2020
- Enrolment in early childhood education, male (number)519,698Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2020
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, both sexes (number)3.72MRanked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, female (number)1.81MRanked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, male (number)1.91MRanked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, both sexes (number)1.56MRanked 1st—· 2012
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, female (number)869,879Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2012
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, male (number)694,223Ranked 1st—· 2012
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, both sexes (number)1.02MRanked 32nd▲ 2· 2020
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, female (number)505,053Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2020
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, male (number)519,698Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2020
- Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number)9.09MRanked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, female (number)4.41MRanked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, male (number)4.67MRanked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number)6.62MRanked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, female (number)3.26MRanked 16th—· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, male (number)3.36MRanked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)3.34MRanked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)1.64MRanked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number)1.7MRanked 12th▼ 4· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes (number)429,305Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, female (number)155,218Ranked 18th—· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, male (number)274,087Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, both sexes (number)2.07MRanked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, female (number)1.09MRanked 15th▲ 3· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, male (number)975,874Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, both sexes (number)692,238Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, female (number)322,544Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, male (number)369,694Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, both sexes (number)150,898Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, female (number)69,759Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2022
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, male (number)81,139Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2022
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, both sexes (number)2.9MRanked 18th—· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, female (number)1.45MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, male (number)1.45MRanked 18th—· 2023
- Existence of funding mechanisms to reallocate education resources to disadvantaged populations0Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Expected years of schooling14Ranked 88th▼ 1· 2023
- Expected years of schooling among boys13.9Ranked 84th▲ 2· 2023
- Expenditure on education as a percentage of total government expenditure (%) (IMF calculation)13.2Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2009
- Expenditure on education as a percentage of total government expenditure (%) (UIS calculation)18.8Ranked 24th▲ 14· 2022
- Expenditure on education as share of government spending18.8%Ranked 24th▲ 14· 2022
- Expenditure on education (public, households, ODA) as a percentage of GDP2.8Ranked 57th▼ 8· 2020
- Expenditure on primary education (% of government expenditure on education)33.1Ranked 15th▼ 12· 2018
- Expenditure on school books and teaching material as % of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%)0.28%Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Expenditure on school books and teaching material as % of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%)0.13%Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2022
- Expenditure on secondary education (% of government expenditure on education)34.4Ranked 14th▼ 7· 2018
- Expenditure on tertiary education (% of government expenditure on education)28.2Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2018
- Female primary school age children out-of-school (%)0.23Ranked 36th▲ 5· 2021
- Female pupils below minimum reading proficiency at end of primary (%). Low GAML threshold37.4Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2021
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman1.7Ranked 131st▲ 4· 2024
- Fertility rate, total (births per woman)1.7Ranked 124th▼ 2· 2023
- GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$)529.14BRanked 26th—· 2024
- GDP (constant LCU)17,123.2TRanked 1st—· 2024
- GDP (current LCU)197,860TRanked 1st—· 2024
- GDP (current US$)436.91BRanked 35th▼ 1· 2024
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country)1,155.5Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2024
- GDP growth (annual %)3Ranked 100th▲ 55· 2024
- GDP per capita (current LCU)2.16BRanked 1st—· 2024
- GDP per capita (current US$)4,771.4Ranked 116th▼ 11· 2024
- GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2011 international $)16,224Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2024
- GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)18,441.6Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2024
- GDP, PPP (constant 2011 international $)1.49TRanked 22nd—· 2024
- GDP, PPP (current international $)1.69TRanked 22nd—· 2024
- General government total expenditure (current LCU)43,900TRanked 1st—· 2025
- GNI (current LCU)197,581TRanked 1st—· 2024
- GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$)4,660Ranked 109th▼ 11· 2024
- GNI per capita (current LCU)2.16BRanked 1st—· 2024
- GNI per capita, PPP (current international $)18,420Ranked 93rd▼ 8· 2024
- Government expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)2.8%Ranked 88th▼ 44· 2023
- Government expenditure on education, constant PPP$ (millions)37,830Ranked 18th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, constant US$ (millions)10,146.2Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, constant PPP$ (millions)0Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, constant US$ (millions)0Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, PPP$ (millions)0Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, US$ (millions)0Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, PPP$ (millions)35,312.5Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, total (% of government expenditure)18.8Ranked 24th▲ 14· 2022
- Government expenditure on education, US$ (millions)10,237.7Ranked 29th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on lower secondary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.52%Ranked 65th▲ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions)7,363Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant US$ (millions)1,974.8Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on lower secondary education, PPP$ (millions)6,873Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on lower secondary education, US$ (millions)1,992.6Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.11%Ranked 18th—· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, constant PPP$ (millions)1,520.1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, constant US$ (millions)407.7Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, PPP$ (millions)1,418.9Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on post-secondary non-tertiary education, US$ (millions)411.4Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.01%Ranked 88th▲ 6· 2022
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, constant PPP$ (millions)100.3Ranked 53rd▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, constant US$ (millions)26.9Ranked 57th▲ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, PPP$ (millions)93.6Ranked 54th▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on pre-primary education, US$ (millions)27.2Ranked 56th—· 2022
- Government expenditure on primary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.91%Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on primary education, constant PPP$ (millions)12,882.3Ranked 17th—· 2022
- Government expenditure on primary education, constant US$ (millions)3,455.1Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on primary education, PPP$ (millions)12,025Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on primary education, US$ (millions)3,486.2Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary vocational education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.33%Ranked 26th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary vocational education only, constant PPP$ (millions)4,680.1Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary vocational education only, constant US$ (millions)1,255.2Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary vocational education only, PPP$ (millions)4,368.6Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary vocational education only, US$ (millions)1,266.5Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.98%Ranked 81st▲ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions)13,849.7Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary education, constant US$ (millions)3,714.6Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary education, PPP$ (millions)12,928Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2022
- Government expenditure on secondary education, US$ (millions)3,748Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.74%Ranked 31st▼ 32· 2023
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant PPP$ (millions)9,477.6Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant US$ (millions)2,541.9Ranked 28th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, PPP$ (millions)8,846.9Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, US$ (millions)2,564.9Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.46%Ranked 56th▼ 5· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions)6,486.7Ranked 18th▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant US$ (millions)1,739.8Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, PPP$ (millions)6,055Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2022
- Government expenditure on upper secondary education, US$ (millions)1,755.4Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2022
- Government expenditure per student, primary (% of GDP per capita)11.1Ranked 31st▼ 40· 2017
- Government expenditure per student, secondary (% of GDP per capita)17.5Ranked 20th▼ 31· 2017
- Government expenditure per student, tertiary (% of GDP per capita)24.2Ranked 16th▼ 44· 2017
- Government spending on education as share of GDP2.8%Ranked 88th▼ 44· 2023
- Gross enrollment ratio in primary education102%Ranked 65th▼ 9· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 106th▲ 3· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, both sexes (%)58.7%Ranked 56th▼ 10· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, female (%)59.1%Ranked 70th▼ 4· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, male (%)58.3%Ranked 41st▼ 10· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 66th▼ 22· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%)92.7%Ranked 107th▼ 7· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)92.9%Ranked 105th▼ 10· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%)92.5%Ranked 102nd▼ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 21st▼ 44· 2012
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, both sexes (%)55.2%Ranked 4th▼ 15· 2012
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, female (%)62.9%Ranked 5th▼ 36· 2012
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, male (%)47.9%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2012
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 60th▲ 22· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%)99.1%Ranked 77th▼ 14· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)99.2%Ranked 74th▼ 16· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%)99%Ranked 77th▼ 15· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 58th▼ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%)94.1%Ranked 94th▼ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)94.7%Ranked 92nd▼ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%)93.6%Ranked 91st▼ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, both sexes (%)102%Ranked 65th▼ 9· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female (%)102%Ranked 62nd▼ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, male (%)101.9%Ranked 68th▼ 14· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 79th▲ 4· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes (%)84.7%Ranked 62nd▼ 1· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%)85.1%Ranked 67th▲ 3· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male (%)84.4%Ranked 55th▲ 1· 2022
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 60th▼ 15· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes (%)85.1%Ranked 104th▲ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%)86.2%Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male (%)84.2%Ranked 99th▲ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPI)1Ranked 62nd▼ 15· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, both sexes (%)77.1%Ranked 94th▼ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female (%)79.1%Ranked 99th▼ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male (%)75.3%Ranked 96th▲ 5· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 70th▼ 4· 2021
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, both sexes (%)29.6%Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2021
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, female (%)30.4%Ranked 57th▼ 5· 2021
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, male (%)28.9%Ranked 44th▼ 4· 2021
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, female (% of relevant age group)104.6Ranked 46th▼ 10· 2017
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, male (% of relevant age group)105.4Ranked 38th▼ 15· 2017
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, total (% of relevant age group)105Ranked 41st▼ 10· 2017
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 50th▼ 32· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)85.2%Ranked 83rd▼ 2· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)87.1%Ranked 82nd▼ 9· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)83.5%Ranked 84th▲ 2· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 54th▲ 13· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%)97.4%Ranked 54th▼ 5· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, female (%)98%Ranked 51st▲ 3· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, male (%)96.9%Ranked 60th▼ 7· 2023
- Harmonized test scores among all students432.1Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2020
- Harmonized test scores among all students432.1Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2020
- Harmonized test scores among all students432.1Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2020
- Hidden Hunger Index in pre-school children25Ranked 42nd· 2009
- Hidden Hunger Index in preschool children25Ranked 42nd· 2009
- Hidden Hunger Index in pre-school children (Muthayya et al. (2013))25Ranked 42nd· 2009
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, female (scale 0–188)121.7Ranked 67th▼ 5· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, male (scale 0–188)119Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, total (scale 0–188)120.3Ranked 67th—· 2025
- IIASA rates of no education projections1.1%Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2100
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, both sexes (number)124,540Ranked 5th▼ 8· 2016
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, % female55Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2016
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, female (number)68,662Ranked 4th▼ 9· 2016
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, male (number)55,879Ranked 7th▼ 8· 2016
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, both sexes (number)122,543Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2016
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, % female52Ranked 5th▼ 10· 2016
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, female (number)63,188Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2016
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, male (number)59,355Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2016
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.51Ranked 51st▼ 16· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, both sexes (number)6,541Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, female (number)1,558Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, male (number)4,983Ranked 17th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, both sexes (number)83Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, female (number)36Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, male (number)47Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, both sexes (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, female (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, male (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, both sexes (number)62Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, female (number)10Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, male (number)52Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, both sexes (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, female (number)0Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, male (number)0Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, both sexes (number)416Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, female (number)98Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, male (number)318Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, both sexes (number)5Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, female (number)1Ranked 21st▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, male (number)4Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, both sexes (number)229Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, female (number)31Ranked 24th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, male (number)198Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, both sexes (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, female (number)0Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, male (number)0Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 25th▲ 5· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, both sexes (number)22Ranked 17th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, female (number)8Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, male (number)14Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, both sexes (number)224Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, female (number)9Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, male (number)215Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2018
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, both sexes (number)215Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, female (number)43Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, male (number)172Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2014
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, both sexes (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, female (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, male (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd▼ 47· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, both sexes (number)45Ranked 37th▼ 6· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, female (number)22Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, male (number)23Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 17th· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, female (number)0Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, male (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, female (number)0Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, both sexes (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, female (number)0Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, male (number)0Ranked 13th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.13Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, both sexes (number)186Ranked 13th▼ 16· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, female (number)46Ranked 12th▼ 10· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, male (number)140Ranked 9th▼ 16· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, both sexes (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 6· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, female (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, male (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.2Ranked 45th▼ 6· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, both sexes (number)284Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, female (number)81Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, male (number)203Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, female (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, male (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, both sexes (number)416Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, female (number)80Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, male (number)336Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.75Ranked 28th▲ 25· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, both sexes (number)193Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, female (number)79Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, male (number)114Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, both sexes (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, male (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, female (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, male (number)0Ranked 22nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, both sexes (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, female (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, male (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, both sexes (number)512Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, female (number)135Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, male (number)377Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, both sexes (number)83Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, female (number)6Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, male (number)77Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd▼ 23· 2017
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, both sexes (number)254Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, female (number)67Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, male (number)187Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 20th· 2016
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, both sexes (number)14Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, female (number)3Ranked 13th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, male (number)11Ranked 13th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, both sexes (number)1Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, female (number)1Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, both sexes (number)39Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, female (number)13Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, male (number)26Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, both sexes (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, female (number)0Ranked 23rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, male (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, female (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, male (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, both sexes (number)672Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, female (number)127Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.83Ranked 9th▼ 9· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, both sexes (number)1,292Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, female (number)318Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, male (number)974Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, male (number)545Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, both sexes (number)41Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, female (number)18Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, male (number)23Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, both sexes (number)0Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, female (number)0Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, male (number)0Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.19Ranked 28th▲ 12· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, both sexes (number)209Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, female (number)27Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, male (number)182Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, female (number)0Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, male (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, both sexes (number)114Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, female (number)40Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, male (number)74Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 30th▲ 10· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, both sexes (number)6Ranked 24th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, female (number)1Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, male (number)5Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, both sexes (number)47Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, female (number)19Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, male (number)28Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, female (number)0Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, male (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, both sexes (number)46Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, female (number)15Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, male (number)31Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan (pre-secession), both sexes (number)5Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2010
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, both sexes (number)5Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, female (number)0Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, male (number)5Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 37th· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, both sexes (number)1Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, female (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, male (number)1Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, both sexes (number)33Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, female (number)9Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, male (number)24Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 30th▲ 4· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, both sexes (number)21Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, female (number)5Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, male (number)16Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 28th▲ 18· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, both sexes (number)371Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, female (number)64Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, male (number)307Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, both sexes (number)15Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, female (number)4Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, male (number)11Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.6Ranked 32nd▲ 29· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, both sexes (number)69Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, female (number)33Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, male (number)36Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, both sexes (number)264Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, female (number)93Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, male (number)171Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 17th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, both sexes (number)26Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, female (number)9Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, male (number)17Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.29Ranked 39th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, both sexes (number)26Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, female (number)7Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, male (number)19Ranked 22nd▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.68Ranked 54th▲ 17· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, both sexes (number)122,822Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, female (number)37,520Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, male (number)85,302Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, both sexes (number)42,796Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, female (number)15,496Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, male (number)27,300Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 27th▲ 19· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, both sexes (number)2Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, female (number)1Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, male (number)1Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 9th▼ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, both sexes (number)983Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, female (number)388Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, male (number)595Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, both sexes (number)527Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, female (number)215Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, male (number)312Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.82Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, both sexes (number)787Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, female (number)170Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, male (number)617Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, female (number)0Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, male (number)0Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, both sexes (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, female (number)0Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, male (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, female (number)0Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, male (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.77Ranked 55th▼ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, both sexes (number)338Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, female (number)136Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, male (number)202Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 26th▲ 6· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, female (number)0Ranked 26th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, male (number)0Ranked 27th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 22nd▼ 15· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, both sexes (number)60Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, female (number)26Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, male (number)34Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, both sexes (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, female (number)0Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, male (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, both sexes (number)3,009Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, female (number)1,452Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, male (number)1,557Ranked 14th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, both sexes (number)293Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, female (number)105Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, male (number)188Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.34Ranked 28th▲ 13· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, both sexes (number)60,398Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, female (number)14,224Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, male (number)46,174Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, both sexes (number)0Ranked 46th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, female (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, male (number)0Ranked 40th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 19th▲ 6· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, both sexes (number)58Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, female (number)18Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, male (number)40Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 48th▲ 17· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, both sexes (number)10Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, female (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, male (number)10Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, both sexes (number)13Ranked 41st▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, female (number)4Ranked 42nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, male (number)9Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, both sexes (number)235Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, female (number)54Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, male (number)181Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 18th▲ 17· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, both sexes (number)75Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, female (number)31Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, male (number)44Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2015
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, female (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, male (number)0Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.36Ranked 31st▼ 10· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, both sexes (number)2,166Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, female (number)813Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, male (number)1,353Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, female (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, male (number)0Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, both sexes (number)209Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, female (number)32Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, male (number)177Ranked 13th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, both sexes (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, female (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, male (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, female (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, male (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, both sexes (number)1Ranked 34th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, female (number)0Ranked 28th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, male (number)1Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2018
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, both sexes (number)1Ranked 42nd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, female (number)0Ranked 33rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, male (number)1Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 22nd▼ 9· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, both sexes (number)46Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, female (number)5Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, male (number)41Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, both sexes (number)6,967Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, female (number)3,270Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, male (number)3,697Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.25Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, both sexes (number)44Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, female (number)11Ranked 22nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, male (number)33Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, both sexes (number)5Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, female (number)2Ranked 22nd▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, male (number)3Ranked 24th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.9Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, both sexes (number)866Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, female (number)217Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, male (number)649Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, both sexes (number)33Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, female (number)5Ranked 25th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, male (number)28Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.43Ranked 40th▲ 12· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, both sexes (number)7Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, female (number)5Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, male (number)2Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd▼ 10· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, both sexes (number)135Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, female (number)58Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, male (number)77Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 39th—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, both sexes (number)5Ranked 33rd▼ 6· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, female (number)2Ranked 34th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, male (number)3Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 20th▲ 19· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, both sexes (number)1Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, female (number)0Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, male (number)1Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, both sexes (number)0Ranked 57th▲ 5· 2021
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, female (number)0Ranked 52nd· 2021
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, male (number)0Ranked 55th· 2021
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▲ 34· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, both sexes (number)143Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, female (number)49Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, male (number)94Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, both sexes (number)19Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, female (number)3Ranked 37th▲ 7· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, male (number)16Ranked 30th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.39Ranked 37th▲ 10· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, both sexes (number)1,686Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, female (number)450Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, male (number)1,236Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, both sexes (number)24Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, female (number)9Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, male (number)15Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.23Ranked 22nd▲ 8· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, both sexes (number)220Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, female (number)61Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, male (number)159Ranked 11th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, both sexes (number)0Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, female (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, male (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.77Ranked 24th▲ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, both sexes (number)633Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, female (number)199Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, male (number)434Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.33Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, both sexes (number)9Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, female (number)3Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, male (number)6Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 25th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2016
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, both sexes (number)18Ranked 29th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, female (number)6Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, male (number)12Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, both sexes (number)0Ranked 46th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, female (number)0Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, male (number)0Ranked 39th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, female (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, male (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, both sexes (number)0Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, male (number)0Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, female (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, male (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, male (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, both sexes (number)1Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, female (number)1Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, male (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, female (number)0Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, male (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, both sexes (number)1Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, female (number)1Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, male (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, female (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, both sexes (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, female (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, male (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, both sexes (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, female (number)0Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, male (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, both sexes (number)1Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, female (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, male (number)1Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, both sexes (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, female (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, male (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, female (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, male (number)0Ranked 28th▲ 7· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, both sexes (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, female (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, female (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, male (number)0Ranked 24th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2017
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, female (number)0Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, male (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, both sexes (number)1Ranked 50th▲ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, female (number)1Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, male (number)0Ranked 42nd▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, both sexes (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, female (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, both sexes (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, female (number)0Ranked 18th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, male (number)0Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2017
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, both sexes (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, female (number)0Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, male (number)0Ranked 22nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, female (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, male (number)0Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, female (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, male (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, female (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, male (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, female (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, male (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Netherlands Antilles, both sexes (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, female (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, both sexes (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, female (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, male (number)0Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)1Ranked 51st▼ 7· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)120Ranked 60th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)60Ranked 57th▼ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)60Ranked 53rd▼ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)1.2Ranked 24th▼ 26· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)379Ranked 30th▼ 6· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)206Ranked 24th▼ 11· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)173Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.79Ranked 58th▼ 8· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)489Ranked 41st▲ 4· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (number)216Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)273Ranked 39th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 53rd▼ 14· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, both sexes (number)861Ranked 53rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, female (number)286Ranked 56th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, male (number)575Ranked 47th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, female (number)0Ranked 36th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, male (number)0Ranked 37th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, both sexes (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, male (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st▼ 43· 2017
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th▼ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, female (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, male (number)0Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 34th▼ 2· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, female (number)0Ranked 32nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, male (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 8th▼ 17· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, both sexes (number)31Ranked 28th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, female (number)11Ranked 30th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, male (number)20Ranked 25th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, both sexes (number)91Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, female (number)9Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, male (number)82Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 36th▼ 5· 2015
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, both sexes (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, female (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, male (number)0Ranked 31st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, female (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, male (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, both sexes (number)61Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, female (number)21Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, male (number)40Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, female (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, male (number)0Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 42nd▲ 9· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, both sexes (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, female (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, male (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.2Ranked 63rd▲ 38· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, both sexes (number)59Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, female (number)27Ranked 44th▲ 8· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, male (number)32Ranked 42nd▲ 8· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 11th▼ 46· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, both sexes (number)258Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, female (number)54Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, male (number)204Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, female (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, male (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 48th▲ 6· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, both sexes (number)0Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, female (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, male (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, both sexes (number)0Ranked 40th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, female (number)0Ranked 34th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, male (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 23rd▲ 22· 2015
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, both sexes (number)1Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, female (number)1Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, male (number)0Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, both sexes (number)2Ranked 38th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, female (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, male (number)2Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 7th▼ 50· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, both sexes (number)13Ranked 51st▼ 6· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, female (number)6Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, male (number)7Ranked 53rd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2013
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, female (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, male (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, both sexes (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, female (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, male (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, female (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, male (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, both sexes (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, female (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, both sexes (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, female (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, male (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, male (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, female (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, male (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, female (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, male (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, both sexes (number)24Ranked 32nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, female (number)10Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, male (number)14Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, both sexes (number)1Ranked 44th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, female (number)1Ranked 39th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, male (number)0Ranked 36th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, both sexes (number)0Ranked 42nd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, female (number)0Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, male (number)0Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 45th▲ 44· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, both sexes (number)1Ranked 40th▼ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, female (number)0Ranked 40th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, male (number)1Ranked 32nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, male (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 29th▼ 12· 2018
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 43rd▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, female (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, male (number)0Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 30th▼ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, both sexes (number)1Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, female (number)0Ranked 30th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, male (number)1Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2018
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 6· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, female (number)0Ranked 25th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 58th▼ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, both sexes (number)12Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, female (number)5Ranked 43rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, male (number)7Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, both sexes (number)4Ranked 46th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, female (number)2Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, male (number)2Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 23rd· 2016
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, both sexes (number)0Ranked 42nd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, female (number)0Ranked 40th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, male (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2014
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, female (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, male (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, male (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 49th▲ 48· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, both sexes (number)45Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, female (number)19Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, male (number)26Ranked 23rd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2016
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, both sexes (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, female (number)0Ranked 28th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, male (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 35th▼ 22· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, both sexes (number)93Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, female (number)58Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, male (number)35Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, both sexes (number)1Ranked 53rd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, female (number)1Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, male (number)0Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, both sexes (number)145Ranked 32nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, female (number)51Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, male (number)94Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)18Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, female (number)10Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, male (number)8Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.2Ranked 71st▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (number)73Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)18Ranked 63rd—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, female (number)27Ranked 50th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, male (number)46Ranked 44th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.6Ranked 68th▲ 21· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.84Ranked 72nd▲ 14· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)68Ranked 77th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)31Ranked 74th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)37Ranked 73rd▲ 4· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, both sexes (number)174Ranked 40th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, female (number)54Ranked 46th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, male (number)120Ranked 38th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, female (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, male (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 9th▲ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, both sexes (number)161Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, female (number)47Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, male (number)114Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.25Ranked 72nd▲ 7· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, both sexes (number)13Ranked 66th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, female (number)7Ranked 57th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, male (number)6Ranked 63rd▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, the Caribbean and Central America, both sexes (number)4Ranked 44th▼ 8· 2005
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.7Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, both sexes (number)120Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, female (number)41Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, male (number)79Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.7Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, both sexes (number)120Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, female (number)41Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, male (number)79Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, female (number)0Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, male (number)0Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, female (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, male (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, both sexes (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, female (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, female (number)0Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, male (number)0Ranked 24th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, female (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, male (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, female (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, male (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, female (number)0Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, male (number)0Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, both sexes (number)0Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, female (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, male (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, female (number)0Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, male (number)0Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, female (number)0Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, male (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, female (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, female (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, male (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, female (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, both sexes (number)0Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, female (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, male (number)0Ranked 7th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America, both sexes (number)0Ranked 51st▼ 2· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 36th▲ 35· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, both sexes (number)19Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, female (number)9Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, male (number)10Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 53rd▲ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, both sexes (number)24Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, female (number)6Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, male (number)18Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, female (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, male (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, both sexes (number)20Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, female (number)8Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, male (number)12Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, both sexes (number)1Ranked 37th▼ 4· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, female (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, male (number)1Ranked 30th▼ 5· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, both sexes (number)1Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, female (number)0Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, male (number)1Ranked 12th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, both sexes (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 6· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, female (number)0Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, male (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 7· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, both sexes (number)4Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, female (number)1Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, male (number)3Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, female (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, male (number)0Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, female (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, male (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, female (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, both sexes (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, female (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, male (number)0Ranked 19th—· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.94Ranked 18th▲ 10· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)13,773Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)6,677Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)7,096Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.46Ranked 60th▼ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)227Ranked 58th▲ 4· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (number)72Ranked 58th▲ 3· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (number)155Ranked 57th▲ 5· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate) (number)0.35Ranked 36th▲ 7· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)8,145Ranked 14th—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (number)2,115Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (number)6,030Ranked 11th—· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Caribbean and Central America, both sexes (number)4Ranked 46th▼ 4· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.89Ranked 31st▼ 15· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, both sexes (number)0Ranked 54th▲ 2· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, female (number)0Ranked 51st▲ 7· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, male (number)0Ranked 50th▲ 6· 2022
- Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate) (GPIA)0.45Ranked 92nd▲ 7· 2022
- Inbound mobility rate, both sexes3.9%Ranked 61st▼ 7· 2022
- Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)3.9%Ranked 61st▼ 7· 2022
- Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate) (%)2.4%Ranked 67th▼ 5· 2022
- Inbound mobility rate, male (UIS estimate) (%)5.4%Ranked 51st▼ 9· 2022
- Inequality in education0.22Ranked 128th▲ 2· 2023
- Initial government expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)1.7%Ranked 77th▼ 9· 2022
- Initial government funding per lower secondary student as a percentage of GDP per capita15.7Ranked 51st—· 2020
- Initial government funding per lower secondary student, constant PPP$2,360.8Ranked 53rd▼ 1· 2020
- Initial government funding per pre-primary student as a percentage of GDP per capita1Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2020
- Initial government funding per pre-primary student, constant PPP$152.6Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2020
- Initial government funding per primary student as a percentage of GDP per capita11Ranked 66th▲ 2· 2020
- Initial government funding per primary student, constant PPP$1,654.9Ranked 65th▲ 1· 2020
- Initial government funding per secondary student as a percentage of GDP per capita16.1Ranked 55th▲ 8· 2020
- Initial government funding per secondary student, constant PPP$2,425.6Ranked 58th▲ 6· 2020
- Initial government funding per tertiary student as a percentage of GDP per capita19.3Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2022
- Initial government funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$3,086.4Ranked 54th▼ 4· 2022
- Initial government funding per upper secondary student as a percentage of GDP per capita16.7Ranked 53rd▲ 28· 2020
- Initial government funding per upper secondary student, constant PPP$2,508.2Ranked 54th▲ 8· 2020
- Initial private expenditure on education (household) as a percentage of GDP (%)0.6%Ranked 38th▲ 4· 2020
- International expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.04%Ranked 42nd▲ 13· 2022
- Learning-adjusted years of schooling among boys8Ranked 76th▲ 4· 2020
- Learning poverty: Share of Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)41.5Ranked 49th▲ 10· 2021
- Learning poverty: Share of Female Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)37.5Ranked 37th▲ 8· 2021
- Learning poverty: Share of Male Children at the End-of-Primary age below minimum reading proficiency adjusted by Out-of-School Children (%)45Ranked 37th▲ 6· 2021
- Life expectancy at birth, total (years)77.7Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Literacy rate88.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Literacy rate88.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Literacy rate, adult female (% of females ages 15 and above)85.1Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2023
- Literacy rate, adult male (% of males ages 15 and above)92.8Ranked 20th—· 2023
- Literacy rate among adults aged 15+88.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Literacy rate among adults aged 15+88.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Literacy rate among older adults aged 65+49.8%Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Literacy rate among young men aged 15–2498.9%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2023
- Literacy rate among young people (15–24 years), adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, adjusted gender parity index (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (GPIA)0.94Ranked 6th· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.82Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, both sexes (%)91.7%Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2023
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, both sexes (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)93%Ranked 10th· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female (%)88.7%Ranked 27th▼ 4· 2023
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.76Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)90.3%Ranked 13th· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, male (%)94.8%Ranked 23rd—· 2023
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.89Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, male (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)95.6%Ranked 9th· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, both sexes (%)75.3%Ranked 29th▲ 4· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, female (%)67%Ranked 29th▲ 5· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, male (%)84.2%Ranked 26th▲ 6· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 12th—· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, both sexes (%)91.4%Ranked 33rd▲ 6· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, female (%)87.9%Ranked 32nd▲ 5· 2016
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, male (%)94.8%Ranked 30th▲ 4· 2016
- Literacy rate, youth (ages 15-24), gender parity index (GPI)1Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Literacy rate, youth female (% of females ages 15-24)98.6Ranked 20th▼ 6· 2023
- Literacy rate, youth male (% of males ages 15-24)98.9Ranked 16th▼ 4· 2023
- Literacy rate, youth total (% of people ages 15-24)98.7Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2023
- Lower secondary completion rate, female (% of relevant age group)87.1Ranked 82nd▼ 9· 2023
- Lower secondary completion rate, male (% of relevant age group)83.5Ranked 84th▲ 2· 2023
- Lower secondary completion rate, total (% of relevant age group)85.2Ranked 83rd▼ 2· 2023
- Lower secondary school starting age (years)12Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Male primary school age children out-of-school (%)0.23Ranked 36th▲ 5· 2021
- Male pupils below minimum reading proficiency at end of primary (%). Low GAML threshold44.9Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2021
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2016
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, both sexes10.3Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2016
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, female10.2Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2016
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, male10.4Ranked 39th▼ 4· 2016
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.91Ranked 104th▼ 6· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)1.7%Ranked 113th▼ 8· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, female (UIS estimate) (%)1.6%Ranked 115th▼ 11· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, male (UIS estimate) (%)1.8%Ranked 107th▼ 11· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.6Ranked 71st▲ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.48%Ranked 45th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.36%Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.6%Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.2Ranked 33rd▼ 10· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.04%Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.04%Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.03%Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 87th▲ 3· 2018
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.03%Ranked 87th▲ 7· 2018
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.65Ranked 125th▲ 9· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.68Ranked 122nd▲ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 135th▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 138th▲ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 124th▼ 9· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 133rd▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 135th▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 124th▼ 8· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.1Ranked 87th▼ 11· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)1%Ranked 87th▼ 10· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)1.1%Ranked 83rd▼ 11· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)1%Ranked 90th▼ 13· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.1Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 77th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 113th▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 105th▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 110th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.78Ranked 49th▼ 13· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 55th▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 61st▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.2Ranked 60th▼ 23· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 59th▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 59th▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2023
- Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births)10.7Ranked 50th▼ 2· 2023
- Net enrollment rate in pre-primary education59.8%Ranked 91st▲ 5· 2020
- Net enrollment rate in primary education99.9%Ranked 7th▼ 9· 2023
- Net enrollment rate in primary education among girls98.5%Ranked 26th▲ 8· 2020
- Net enrollment rate, pre-primary, boys (%)58.9%Ranked 98th▲ 10· 2020
- Net enrollment rates in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 40th▼ 46· 2023
- Net enrollment rates in primary education, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 31st▼ 14· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes (%)59.8%Ranked 60th▲ 6· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, female (%)60.8%Ranked 57th▲ 5· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, male (%)58.8%Ranked 54th▲ 3· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 33rd▼ 15· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, both sexes (%)59.8%Ranked 91st▲ 5· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female (%)60.8%Ranked 86th▲ 5· 2020
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, male (%)58.8%Ranked 86th▲ 3· 2020
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 54th▼ 6· 2020
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)-45,025Ranked 110th▲ 9· 2020
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), female (UIS estimate) (number)-21,780Ranked 105th▲ 9· 2020
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), male (UIS estimate) (number)-23,245Ranked 102nd▲ 8· 2020
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 31st▼ 10· 2020
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)-1.4%Ranked 58th▲ 8· 2020
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), female (UIS estimate) (%)-1.4%Ranked 55th▲ 5· 2020
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), male (UIS estimate) (%)-1.4%Ranked 53rd▲ 6· 2020
- Net intake rate in grade 1, female (% of official school-age population)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Net intake rate in grade 1, male (% of official school-age population)100Ranked 2nd—· 2017
- Net intake rate in grade 1 (% of official school-age population)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%)6.3%Ranked 40th▲ 15· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)23.1%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)2.7%Ranked 38th▲ 4· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%)10.5%Ranked 32nd▲ 9· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)15.1%Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%)6.3%Ranked 41st▲ 13· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)38.4%Ranked 3rd▼ 6· 2022
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)6.3%Ranked 39th▲ 11· 2022
- Normalized harmonized test scores among all students0.74Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2020
- Number of attacks on students, personnel and institutions2Ranked 32nd▲ 7· 2024
- Number of years of compulsory pre-primary education guaranteed in legal frameworks0Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Number of years of compulsory primary and secondary education guaranteed in legal frameworks9Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Number of years of free pre-primary education guaranteed in legal frameworks0Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Number of years of free primary and secondary education guaranteed in legal frameworks9Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Official entrance age to compulsory education6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to compulsory education (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to early childhood education (years)5Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to lower secondary education (years)12Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to post-secondary non-tertiary education (years)17Ranked 5th—· 2012
- Official entrance age to pre-primary education (years)5Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to pre-primary education (years)5Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to primary education (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to upper secondary education (years)15Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Official exchange rate (LCU per US$, period average)42,000Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)27,872Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)10,118Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)17,754Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)2,246Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)1,210Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)1,035Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)4,547Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2018
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)1,752Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2018
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)116Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (number)45Ranked 71st▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (number)71Ranked 64th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)99Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (number)38Ranked 65th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (number)61Ranked 55th▼ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)60,099Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)30,503Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)29,596Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)413Ranked 29th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)217Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)196Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)58Ranked 73rd▲ 6· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (number)29Ranked 70th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (number)29Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)4,306Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (number)1,841Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (number)2,465Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)2,881Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (number)1,525Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)1,356Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)2.6%Ranked 86th▲ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate) (%)2.4%Ranked 82nd▲ 3· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, male (UIS estimate) (%)2.8%Ranked 84th▲ 1· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 44th▲ 3· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.78%Ranked 37th▼ 4· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.61%Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.95%Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 23rd▲ 17· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 11th—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.13%Ranked 67th▲ 1· 2018
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2018
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.78Ranked 55th▼ 13· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.78Ranked 52nd▼ 15· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 83rd▲ 3· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 77th▲ 4· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 81st▲ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 78th▲ 5· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)1.5%Ranked 85th▲ 4· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)1.5%Ranked 73rd▼ 4· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)1.5%Ranked 84th▲ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 40th▲ 10· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 31st▲ 8· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 42nd▲ 12· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 23rd▼ 18· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 60th—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 58th▲ 2· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 58th—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.68Ranked 18th▲ 10· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.13%Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.1%Ranked 27th▲ 5· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.15%Ranked 42nd▲ 6· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 30th▼ 12· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 41st—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.07%Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2022
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, both sexes (number)1.15MRanked 22nd—· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, female (number)519,772Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, male (number)629,142Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (number)303,861Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (number)140,725Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (number)163,136Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, both sexes (number)1.16MRanked 24th—· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, female (number)519,772Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, male (number)638,305Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, both sexes (number)313,024Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, female (number)140,725Ranked 29th▲ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, male (number)172,299Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age9,163Ranked 81st▲ 24· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, both sexes (number)9,163Ranked 81st▲ 24· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, female (number)60,444Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, male (number)91,080Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (number)611,715Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, female (number)288,609Ranked 7th—· 2020
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, male (number)323,106Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school girls of primary school age60,444Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 81st▲ 28· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)14.8%Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, female (%)13.8%Ranked 51st—· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, male (%)15.8%Ranked 54th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 69th▲ 34· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.1Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (%)7.6%Ranked 59th▲ 13· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)2%Ranked 120th▲ 6· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (%)7.2%Ranked 55th▲ 12· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (modelled data) (%)2.1%Ranked 110th▼ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (%)7.9%Ranked 54th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (modelled data) (%)1.8%Ranked 122nd▲ 3· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 84th▲ 17· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)6.9%Ranked 77th▼ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, female (%)6.4%Ranked 74th▲ 9· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, male (%)7.4%Ranked 68th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 82nd▲ 9· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, both sexes (%)2.4%Ranked 82nd▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, female (%)2.2%Ranked 79th▲ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, male (%)2.6%Ranked 76th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age0.1%Ranked 140th▲ 9· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 89th▲ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)0.82Ranked 111th▲ 17· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, both sexes (%)0.1%Ranked 140th▲ 9· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)1.6%Ranked 99th▼ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female (%)1.5%Ranked 82nd▼ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female (modelled data) (%)1.4%Ranked 102nd▼ 4· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male (%)2.1%Ranked 74th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male (modelled data) (%)1.7%Ranked 103rd▼ 5· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before official primary entry age40.2%Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 68th▲ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (%)40.2%Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, female (%)39.2%Ranked 22nd▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, male (%)41.1%Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 79th▲ 18· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1Ranked 65th▼ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)22.5%Ranked 60th▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)9.4%Ranked 121st▲ 10· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (%)20.7%Ranked 57th▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (modelled data) (%)9.4%Ranked 115th▲ 4· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (%)24.1%Ranked 63rd▼ 7· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (modelled data) (%)9.4%Ranked 121st▲ 1· 2025
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (number)845,053Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, female (number)379,047Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, male (number)466,006Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2023
- Over-age students, primary, female (% of female enrollment)10.5Ranked 39th▲ 7· 2017
- Over-age students, primary, male (% of male enrollment)4.9Ranked 79th▲ 7· 2017
- Over-age students, primary (% of enrollment)7.7Ranked 54th▲ 9· 2017
- Participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training, by sex (%) - 15 to 64 years old - Both sexes12.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2022
- Participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age), by sex (%)59.8Ranked 110th▲ 4· 2020
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 76th▼ 2· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)57.9%Ranked 48th▼ 6· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, female (%)58.6%Ranked 51st▼ 6· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, male (%)57.3%Ranked 43rd▼ 8· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 80th▼ 5· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, both sexes (%)12.2%Ranked 65th▼ 19· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, female (%)11.7%Ranked 75th▼ 15· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, male (%)12.6%Ranked 56th▼ 22· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.79Ranked 72nd▼ 8· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 60th▼ 12· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, female (%)1.6%Ranked 63rd▼ 13· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, male (%)2.1%Ranked 55th▼ 16· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.33Ranked 42nd▲ 5· 2019
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, both sexes (%)0.11%Ranked 43rd▼ 7· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, female (%)0.11%Ranked 42nd▲ 7· 2019
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 55-64 years old, male (%)0.19%Ranked 40th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.78Ranked 3rd· 2010
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, both sexes (%)69.5%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, female (%)70.2%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, male (%)68.8%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, rural (%)58.7%Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, urban (%)75.3%Ranked 1st· 2010
- Percentage of enrollment in primary education in private institutions15.2%Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 39th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, both sexes (%)98%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, female (%)49.3%Ranked 39th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, male (%)50.7%Ranked 82nd▲ 21· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 89th▼ 29· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, both sexes (%)2%Ranked 116th▲ 9· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, female (%)48.2%Ranked 91st▼ 28· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, male (%)51.8%Ranked 36th▲ 34· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 110th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)12.1%Ranked 58th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, female (%)41.3%Ranked 110th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, male (%)58.7%Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 26th▼ 11· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)87.9%Ranked 57th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, female (%)49.7%Ranked 26th▼ 12· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, male (%)50.3%Ranked 93rd▲ 18· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 3rd▼ 8· 2006
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)53.5%Ranked 6th· 2003
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, female (%)72.6%Ranked 3rd▼ 8· 2006
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, male (%)27.4%Ranked 14th▲ 12· 2006
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.41Ranked 23rd▼ 7· 2006
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)46.5%Ranked 33rd· 2003
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, female (%)28.9%Ranked 23rd▼ 7· 2006
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, male (%)71.1%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2006
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions98%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 47th▼ 15· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)98%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, female (%)49.3%Ranked 47th▼ 16· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, male (%)50.7%Ranked 87th▲ 20· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 102nd▼ 28· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)2%Ranked 130th▲ 6· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, female (%)48.2%Ranked 102nd▼ 29· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, male (%)51.8%Ranked 38th▲ 34· 2020
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 111th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)15.2%Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, female (%)44.3%Ranked 111th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, male (%)55.7%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 19th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)84.8%Ranked 71st▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, female (%)49.3%Ranked 19th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, male (%)50.7%Ranked 108th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 99th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)12.3%Ranked 64th▼ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, female (%)44.3%Ranked 100th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, male (%)55.7%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)87.7%Ranked 52nd▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, female (%)49.9%Ranked 36th▼ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, male (%)50.1%Ranked 83rd▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)44.5%Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, female (%)47.8%Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, male (%)52.2%Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 88th▲ 5· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)55.5%Ranked 78th▲ 5· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, female (%)50.1%Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, male (%)49.9%Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2022
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 82nd▼ 7· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)12.6%Ranked 67th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, female (%)48%Ranked 82nd▼ 7· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, male (%)52%Ranked 30th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 44th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)87.4%Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, female (%)50.2%Ranked 44th▼ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, male (%)49.8%Ranked 73rd▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 35th▼ 10· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, female (%)1.8%Ranked 27th▼ 6· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, male (%)1.7%Ranked 47th▼ 8· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, both sexes (%)7.3%Ranked 59th▼ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, female (%)10.6%Ranked 36th▲ 5· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, male (%)4.4%Ranked 77th▲ 1· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.79Ranked 78th▼ 4· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, both sexes (%)28.8%Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, female (%)25.2%Ranked 57th▲ 6· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, male (%)32%Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 52nd▲ 7· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, both sexes (%)8.2%Ranked 61st▼ 16· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, female (%)12.1%Ranked 53rd▼ 13· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, male (%)4.9%Ranked 50th▼ 12· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.37Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, both sexes (%)25.1%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, female (%)13.2%Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, male (%)35.5%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, both sexes (%)8.3%Ranked 68th▼ 16· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, female (%)11.3%Ranked 66th▼ 9· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, male (%)5.6%Ranked 63rd▼ 12· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 2nd· 2004
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 48th▼ 1· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, female (%)0%Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, male (%)0%Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.75Ranked 49th▼ 6· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, both sexes (%)3.2%Ranked 61st▼ 1· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, female (%)2.7%Ranked 56th▼ 6· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, male (%)3.6%Ranked 58th▼ 8· 2021
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%)0.14%Ranked 142nd▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (%)0.07%Ranked 146th▲ 12· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%)0.21%Ranked 140th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%)0.11%Ranked 142nd▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (%)0.08%Ranked 143rd▲ 12· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%)0.14%Ranked 142nd▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in primary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in primary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in primary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.77Ranked 35th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.83Ranked 39th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.83Ranked 33rd· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.88Ranked 44th· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, both sexes (%)70%Ranked 43rd· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, female (%)70.9%Ranked 42nd· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, male (%)69%Ranked 44th· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, rural, both sexes (%)60.1%Ranked 31st· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, urban, both sexes (%)72.1%Ranked 25th· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)74.7%Ranked 34th· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of primary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)65.4%Ranked 42nd· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, both sexes (%)86%Ranked 16th▼ 9· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, female (%)82.2%Ranked 24th▼ 5· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, high socio-economic status, both sexes (%)84.3%Ranked 19th▼ 8· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, low socio-economic status, both sexes (%)87.3%Ranked 9th▼ 14· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, male (%)89.6%Ranked 6th▼ 12· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 42nd▲ 41· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, both sexes (%)82.5%Ranked 15th▲ 14· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, female (%)77.9%Ranked 22nd▲ 21· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, high socio-economic status, both sexes (%)81%Ranked 19th▲ 18· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, low socio-economic status, both sexes (%)84%Ranked 11th▲ 10· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in primary education, male (%)87.1%Ranked 11th▲ 10· 2023
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.75Ranked 1st▼ 44· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.86Ranked 1st▼ 22· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, both sexes (%)67.5%Ranked 2nd▼ 42· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, female (%)69.9%Ranked 2nd▼ 41· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, male (%)65.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 42· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, rural, both sexes (%)53.7%Ranked 1st▼ 40· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, urban, both sexes (%)71.7%Ranked 1st▼ 34· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)73.6%Ranked 1st▼ 22· 2022
- Percentage of students in early grades who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)63.6%Ranked 1st▼ 25· 2022
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, both sexes (%)70.4%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, female (%)73.9%Ranked 34th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, male (%)67.1%Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, rural, both sexes (%)56.4%Ranked 33rd▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, urban, both sexes (%)73.3%Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)77.8%Ranked 33rd▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)64.8%Ranked 38th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in early childhood education who are female (%)89.4%Ranked 43rd▲ 7· 2005
- Percentage of teachers in ISCED 6, 7, and 8 who are female (%)22.3%Ranked 39th▲ 12· 2012
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female (%)48.1%Ranked 87th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)48.1%Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)52.8%Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2017
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, both sexes87.3Ranked 20th▼ 5· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, female90.4Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, males84.5Ranked 18th▼ 10· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in pre-primary education who are female (%)89.4%Ranked 82nd▲ 9· 2005
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who are female (%)76.6%Ranked 92nd▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)76.6%Ranked 52nd▲ 13· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)67.4%Ranked 49th▼ 5· 2017
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, both sexes89.6Ranked 14th▲ 13· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, female89.6Ranked 9th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, male89.7Ranked 11th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education vocational programmes who are female (%)43.6%Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education who are female (%)49.3%Ranked 106th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)49.3%Ranked 55th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)53.6%Ranked 38th▲ 3· 2017
- Percentage of teachers in short cycle tertiary education who are female (%)30.9%Ranked 35th▲ 11· 2012
- Percentage of teachers in tertiary education who are female (%)34%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2020
- Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female (%)50.4%Ranked 79th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)50.4%Ranked 37th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)54.5%Ranked 21st—· 2017
- Persistence to grade 5, female (% of cohort)95.7Ranked 26th▼ 18· 2022
- Persistence to grade 5, male (% of cohort)96.6Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2022
- Persistence to grade 5, total (% of cohort)96.2Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2022
- Persistence to last grade of primary, female (% of cohort)94.4Ranked 34th▼ 23· 2022
- Persistence to last grade of primary, male (% of cohort)94.9Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2022
- Persistence to last grade of primary, total (% of cohort)94.7Ranked 37th▼ 8· 2022
- Population aged 14 years or younger (thousands)20,466.3Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2025
- Population aged 15-24 years (thousands)12,267.5Ranked 18th—· 2025
- Population aged 25-64 years (thousands)51,552.8Ranked 15th—· 2025
- Population aged 65 years or older (thousands)7,734.2Ranked 22nd—· 2025
- Population growth (annual %)1.1Ranked 103rd▲ 2· 2024
- Population of compulsory school age, both sexes (number)13.23MRanked 16th▼ 2· 2025
- Population of compulsory school age, female (number)6.42MRanked 16th▼ 2· 2025
- Population of compulsory school age, male (number)6.8MRanked 16th▼ 2· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, both sexes (number)1.42MRanked 16th▼ 1· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, female (number)691,876Ranked 17th—· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, male (number)730,370Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, both sexes (number)1.43MRanked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, female (number)692,004Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, male (number)734,084Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- Population - Scenario: SSP2 - Sex: All - Age: 15+ - Education: None1.04MRanked 26th▼ 1· 2100
- Post Secondary42.41MRanked 19th—· 2100
- Poverty headcount ratio at $3.20 a day (PPP) (% of population)7.5%Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $)117,170.2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $)113,984.9Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Preprimary education, duration (years)1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Prevalence of night blindness (WHO (2017))0.5%Ranked 24th· 2005
- Price level ratio of PPP conversion factor (GDP) to market exchange rate0.26Ranked 170th▼ 14· 2024
- Primary completion rate, female (% of relevant age group)98Ranked 51st▲ 3· 2023
- Primary completion rate, male (% of relevant age group)96.9Ranked 60th▼ 7· 2023
- Primary education, duration (years)6Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Primary education, pupils9.09MRanked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Primary education, pupils (% female)50.1Ranked 14th▲ 6· 2017
- Primary education, teachers372,396Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Primary education, teachers (% female)76.6Ranked 92nd▲ 9· 2023
- Primary school10.6%Ranked 5th· 2012
- Primary school49.8%Ranked 56th▲ 18· 2023
- Primary school age children out-of-school (%)0.23Ranked 49th▲ 8· 2021
- Primary school starting age (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Productivity: output per hour worked22Ranked 71st—· 2023
- Progression to secondary school (%)95.7Ranked 74th▲ 14· 2016
- Progression to secondary school, female (%)94.5Ranked 70th▲ 28· 2016
- Progression to secondary school, male (%)96.9Ranked 41st▲ 1· 2016
- Proportion of 15-24 year-olds enrolled in vocational education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.68Ranked 80th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, both sexes (%)9%Ranked 54th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, female (%)7.3%Ranked 60th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, male (%)10.7%Ranked 55th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, both sexes (%)26%Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, female (%)25.6%Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, male (%)26.3%Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th▼ 53· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, both sexes (%)30%Ranked 37th▼ 6· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, female (%)30.6%Ranked 37th▼ 7· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, male (%)29.5%Ranked 36th▼ 5· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, both sexes (%)56.2%Ranked 38th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, female (%)60.1%Ranked 37th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, male (%)52.8%Ranked 37th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to basic drinking water (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to electricity (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with basic handwashing facilities (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with single-sex basic sanitation facilities (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to basic drinking water (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to electricity (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with basic handwashing facilities (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with single-sex basic sanitation facilities (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.32Ranked 145th▲ 112· 2023
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.56Ranked 133rd▲ 129· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 30th▲ 7· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 23rd▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of secondary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of secondary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.2Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.23Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.6Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.52Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, both sexes (%)28.6%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)16.6%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, female (%)27.9%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, immigrant background, both sexes (%)17.3%Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, male (%)29.2%Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)29%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, rural areas, both sexes (%)7.9%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)32.1%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, urban areas, both sexes (%)40.6%Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)56%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)12.9%Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 63· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.55Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.41Ranked 41st▼ 6· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.52Ranked 47th▲ 44· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.61Ranked 43rd▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, both sexes (%)31.2%Ranked 46th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)20.2%Ranked 44th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, female (%)31.7%Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, immigrant background, both sexes (%)20.5%Ranked 47th▲ 16· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, male (%)30.7%Ranked 46th—· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)39.4%Ranked 43rd▲ 7· 2019
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, rural areas, both sexes (%)20.4%Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)32.9%Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, urban areas, both sexes (%)37.3%Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)48.6%Ranked 38th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)20.1%Ranked 42nd▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.42Ranked 39th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)1.2Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2006
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.63Ranked 38th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.53Ranked 42nd▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, both sexes (%)58.6%Ranked 47th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)43.4%Ranked 37th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, female (%)62.6%Ranked 45th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, immigrant background, both sexes (%)61.1%Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2006
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, male (%)55.1%Ranked 45th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)51%Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2006
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, rural areas, both sexes (%)30.8%Ranked 37th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)69%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, urban areas, both sexes (%)73.4%Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)80.5%Ranked 38th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)42.9%Ranked 42nd▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 22nd▼ 3· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in pre-primary education, both sexes (%)79.3%Ranked 12th· 2003
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, both sexes (%)97.5%Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, female (%)97.8%Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, male (%)97.2%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, both sexes (%)95.1%Ranked 8th—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, female (%)95.7%Ranked 8th—· 2017
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, male (%)94.5%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2017
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to basic drinking water (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to electricity (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with basic handwashing facilities (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with single-sex basic sanitation facilities (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 13th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)2.3%Ranked 16th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, female (%)1.9%Ranked 15th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 15-24 years old, male (%)2.7%Ranked 15th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.44Ranked 14th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)1.3%Ranked 16th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, female (%)0.8%Ranked 15th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), 25-74 years old, male (%)1.8%Ranked 15th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.47Ranked 17th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.13Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), both sexes (%)1.2%Ranked 26th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), female (%)0.8%Ranked 18th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.2Ranked 11th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), male (%)1.7%Ranked 18th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.14Ranked 10th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 8th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 11th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, female (%)0.2%Ranked 11th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), rural, male (%)0.3%Ranked 11th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 3rd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 4th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), under 15 years old, female (%)0.2%Ranked 3rd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), under 15 years old, male (%)0.3%Ranked 3rd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.48Ranked 11th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, both sexes (%)1.5%Ranked 13th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, female (%)1%Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), urban, male (%)2.1%Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)7.8%Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, female (%)7.4%Ranked 35th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, male (%)8.3%Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.61Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)2.5%Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, female (%)1.9%Ranked 34th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, male (%)3.1%Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.79Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), both sexes (%)5.4%Ranked 47th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), female (%)5.1%Ranked 43rd▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.83Ranked 6th▼ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), male (%)5.7%Ranked 40th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.77Ranked 8th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, both sexes (%)4.5%Ranked 28th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, female (%)4.4%Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, male (%)4.6%Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)16.3%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, female (%)17.5%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, male (%)15.1%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, both sexes (%)5.7%Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, female (%)5.3%Ranked 31st▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, male (%)6%Ranked 29th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 40th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)28.5%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, female (%)26.7%Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, male (%)30.3%Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.55Ranked 43rd▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)30.5%Ranked 30th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, female (%)21.7%Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, male (%)39.3%Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.32Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1.6%Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.8%Ranked 11th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, male (%)2.5%Ranked 13th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.61Ranked 49th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.5Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, both sexes (%)24.8%Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, female (%)18.7%Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.38Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, male (%)30.9%Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.59Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.41Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, both sexes (%)14.1%Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, female (%)8.3%Ranked 28th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, male (%)20.1%Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)1.5%Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, female (%)1.5%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, male (%)1.4%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.64Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, both sexes (%)28.1%Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, female (%)21.9%Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, male (%)34.3%Ranked 24th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)12%Ranked 41st▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, female (%)11.3%Ranked 38th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, male (%)12.8%Ranked 40th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)8.1%Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, female (%)8.9%Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, male (%)7.3%Ranked 41st▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 3rd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.6%Ranked 15th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.4%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, male (%)0.7%Ranked 14th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.56Ranked 26th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, both sexes (%)7.7%Ranked 53rd▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, female (%)8.1%Ranked 43rd▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.79Ranked 14th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, male (%)7.3%Ranked 47th▲ 18· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.34Ranked 29th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st▼ 17· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, both sexes (%)4.8%Ranked 30th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, female (%)6.7%Ranked 25th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, male (%)2.9%Ranked 32nd▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 8th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)3.3%Ranked 14th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, female (%)3.1%Ranked 13th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, male (%)3.4%Ranked 13th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, both sexes (%)8.6%Ranked 33rd▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, female (%)8.5%Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, male (%)8.6%Ranked 30th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 38th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)24.6%Ranked 38th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, female (%)23.8%Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, male (%)25.4%Ranked 40th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)19.5%Ranked 37th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, female (%)17.4%Ranked 34th▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, male (%)21.5%Ranked 38th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.18Ranked 14th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.3%Ranked 14th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, male (%)1.7%Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.83Ranked 44th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.53Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, both sexes (%)17.2%Ranked 44th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, female (%)15.6%Ranked 42nd▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.45Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, male (%)18.7%Ranked 42nd▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.61Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, both sexes (%)10.3%Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, female (%)8.1%Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, male (%)12.5%Ranked 27th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.79Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)3.7%Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, female (%)3.3%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, male (%)4.2%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, both sexes (%)19.3%Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, female (%)18%Ranked 30th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, male (%)20.6%Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 38th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)81.4%Ranked 32nd▼ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, female (%)79.8%Ranked 32nd▼ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, male (%)82.9%Ranked 27th▼ 17· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)61.9%Ranked 25th▼ 17· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, female (%)59%Ranked 29th▼ 16· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, male (%)64.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 22· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.54Ranked 14th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)7%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, female (%)5%Ranked 13th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, male (%)9.3%Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 43rd▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.69Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), both sexes (%)60.1%Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), female (%)57.8%Ranked 36th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.66Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), male (%)62.4%Ranked 32nd▼ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.73Ranked 30th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, both sexes (%)44.9%Ranked 31st—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, female (%)41.4%Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, male (%)48.4%Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)42.9%Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, female (%)42.7%Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, male (%)43.1%Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 30th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, both sexes (%)64.8%Ranked 25th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, female (%)62.9%Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, male (%)66.7%Ranked 23rd▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 35th▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)88.3%Ranked 24th▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, female (%)87.3%Ranked 27th▼ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, male (%)89.2%Ranked 20th▼ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 34th▼ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)68.4%Ranked 11th▼ 32· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, female (%)67.4%Ranked 13th▼ 28· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, male (%)69.4%Ranked 9th▼ 28· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.62Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)6.1%Ranked 13th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, female (%)4.7%Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, male (%)7.6%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 38th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.75Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, both sexes (%)67.9%Ranked 19th▼ 28· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, female (%)66.9%Ranked 21st▼ 21· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.74Ranked 28th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, male (%)68.8%Ranked 13th▼ 28· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.76Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, both sexes (%)54%Ranked 22nd▼ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, female (%)52.5%Ranked 25th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, male (%)55.4%Ranked 20th▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)58.1%Ranked 4th▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, female (%)57.9%Ranked 3rd▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, male (%)58.3%Ranked 3rd▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 27th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, both sexes (%)72.2%Ranked 10th▼ 24· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, female (%)71.4%Ranked 10th▼ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, male (%)72.9%Ranked 8th▼ 22· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.75Ranked 14th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)2.5%Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, female (%)2.1%Ranked 31st—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, male (%)2.8%Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)1.3%Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, female (%)1%Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, male (%)1.6%Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 5th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.1%Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 75 years old or over, female (%)0%Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 75 years old or over, male (%)0.1%Ranked 5th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.25Ranked 22nd▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), both sexes (%)1.3%Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), female (%)1%Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.25Ranked 20th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), male (%)1.6%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.26Ranked 17th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.6Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, both sexes (%)0.4%Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, female (%)0.3%Ranked 19th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, male (%)0.5%Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.43Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.5%Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, female (%)0.3%Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, male (%)0.7%Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 7th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, both sexes (%)1.6%Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, female (%)1.2%Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, male (%)1.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 18th▼ 26· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)17%Ranked 39th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, female (%)17.6%Ranked 39th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, male (%)16.5%Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.76Ranked 41st▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)10.4%Ranked 42nd▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, female (%)9%Ranked 39th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, male (%)11.8%Ranked 38th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.36Ranked 15th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.7%Ranked 18th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.4%Ranked 17th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, male (%)1.1%Ranked 17th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.84Ranked 44th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.57Ranked 32nd▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, both sexes (%)9.9%Ranked 49th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, female (%)9.1%Ranked 46th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.5Ranked 30th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, male (%)10.8%Ranked 43rd▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.64Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, both sexes (%)6.3%Ranked 34th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, female (%)5.1%Ranked 31st▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, male (%)7.6%Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)3.5%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, female (%)3.5%Ranked 12th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, male (%)3.4%Ranked 13th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.87Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, both sexes (%)11%Ranked 34th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, female (%)10.3%Ranked 33rd▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, male (%)11.8%Ranked 33rd▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 19th▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)12.6%Ranked 26th▲ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, female (%)12.5%Ranked 25th▲ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, male (%)12.6%Ranked 25th▲ 21· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)9.4%Ranked 26th▲ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, female (%)9.9%Ranked 25th▲ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, male (%)8.8%Ranked 24th▲ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.6%Ranked 13th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, female (%)0.7%Ranked 11th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, male (%)0.5%Ranked 12th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▼ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.7Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), both sexes (%)10.7%Ranked 37th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), female (%)11.2%Ranked 30th▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), male (%)10.2%Ranked 31st▲ 16· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.51Ranked 14th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, both sexes (%)8%Ranked 21st▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, female (%)9.9%Ranked 18th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, male (%)5.9%Ranked 20th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)16.2%Ranked 11th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, female (%)17.3%Ranked 9th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, male (%)15.1%Ranked 10th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, both sexes (%)11.5%Ranked 24th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, female (%)11.6%Ranked 23rd▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, male (%)11.5%Ranked 23rd▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.55Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 10th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, female (%)0.6%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 15-24 years old, male (%)1.1%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)0.4%Ranked 10th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, female (%)0.3%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, 25-74 years old, male (%)0.6%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.2Ranked 7th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, both sexes (%)0.4%Ranked 17th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, female (%)0.3%Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.33Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, male (%)0.6%Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.14Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, both sexes (%)0.1%Ranked 7th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, female (%)0.1%Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, rural, male (%)0.1%Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 5th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.1%Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, under 15 years old, female (%)0.1%Ranked 5th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, under 15 years old, male (%)0.2%Ranked 5th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.43Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, both sexes (%)0.5%Ranked 7th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, female (%)0.3%Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, urban, male (%)0.7%Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 14th▼ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)21.6%Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, female (%)24.8%Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, male (%)18.6%Ranked 35th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 7th▼ 27· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)19.9%Ranked 36th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, female (%)22.7%Ranked 35th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, male (%)17.2%Ranked 34th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.52Ranked 13th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1.6%Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, female (%)1.1%Ranked 14th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, male (%)2.1%Ranked 13th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 9th▼ 18· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.62Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), both sexes (%)17%Ranked 45th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), female (%)19.3%Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.56Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), male (%)14.8%Ranked 40th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.69Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 21st▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, both sexes (%)11.6%Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, female (%)12.1%Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, male (%)11%Ranked 28th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)3.2%Ranked 6th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, female (%)2.9%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, male (%)3.4%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▼ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, both sexes (%)18.7%Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, female (%)21.5%Ranked 29th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, male (%)15.9%Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.76Ranked 28th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)1.5%Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, female (%)1.3%Ranked 26th▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, male (%)1.7%Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.55Ranked 28th▼ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)1.7%Ranked 29th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, female (%)1.2%Ranked 26th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, male (%)2.2%Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.1%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 75 years old or over, female (%)0%Ranked 7th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 75 years old or over, male (%)0.1%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.59Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.44Ranked 23rd▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, both sexes (%)1.4%Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, female (%)1%Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.5Ranked 19th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, male (%)1.7%Ranked 27th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.45Ranked 23rd▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, both sexes (%)0.7%Ranked 27th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, female (%)0.6%Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, male (%)0.9%Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.1%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, female (%)0.1%Ranked 1st· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, male (%)0.1%Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.6Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, both sexes (%)1.6%Ranked 27th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, female (%)1.2%Ranked 22nd—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, male (%)2%Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 31st▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)6.1%Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, female (%)5.6%Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, male (%)6.6%Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.51Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)4%Ranked 36th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, female (%)2.7%Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, male (%)5.3%Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 14th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.2%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, male (%)0.2%Ranked 13th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 42nd▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.28Ranked 28th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, both sexes (%)3.6%Ranked 52nd▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, female (%)2.6%Ranked 42nd▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.21Ranked 27th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, male (%)4.5%Ranked 39th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.31Ranked 26th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.41Ranked 27th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, both sexes (%)1.2%Ranked 29th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, female (%)0.7%Ranked 28th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, male (%)1.7%Ranked 27th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.4%Ranked 15th▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, female (%)0.4%Ranked 13th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, male (%)0.4%Ranked 13th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.61Ranked 28th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, both sexes (%)4.3%Ranked 31st▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, female (%)3.3%Ranked 27th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, male (%)5.4%Ranked 29th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 33rd—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)24.6%Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, female (%)23.4%Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, male (%)25.8%Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 12th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)14.7%Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, female (%)14.6%Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, male (%)14.9%Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1.2%Ranked 14th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, female (%)0.8%Ranked 13th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, male (%)1.6%Ranked 13th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 12th▼ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.56Ranked 25th▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), both sexes (%)17%Ranked 42nd▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), female (%)16.9%Ranked 40th▲ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.65Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), male (%)17.1%Ranked 40th▲ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.46Ranked 25th▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 3rd▼ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, both sexes (%)10.6%Ranked 28th▲ 15· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, female (%)12%Ranked 25th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, male (%)9.1%Ranked 26th▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)22.6%Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, female (%)23.9%Ranked 8th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, male (%)21.3%Ranked 9th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 15th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, both sexes (%)19%Ranked 30th▲ 16· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, female (%)18.4%Ranked 24th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, male (%)19.6%Ranked 27th▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 9th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)1.3%Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, female (%)1%Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, male (%)1.5%Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 9th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)0.7%Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, female (%)0.6%Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, male (%)0.9%Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.25Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, both sexes (%)0.7%Ranked 14th—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, female (%)0.5%Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.14Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, male (%)0.8%Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.3Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.33Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, female (%)0.1%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, male (%)0.3%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.33Ranked 1st· 2013
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, female (%)0.1%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, male (%)0%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, female (%)0.7%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, male (%)1%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)46.1%Ranked 11th▼ 27· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, female (%)45%Ranked 12th▼ 22· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, male (%)47.1%Ranked 9th▼ 28· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 4th▼ 23· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)8%Ranked 26th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, female (%)9.9%Ranked 22nd▼ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, male (%)6%Ranked 27th▼ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 7th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.3%Ranked 8th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, female (%)0%Ranked 9th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, male (%)0.5%Ranked 6th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.88Ranked 2nd▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), both sexes (%)24.9%Ranked 13th▼ 22· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), female (%)25.7%Ranked 11th▼ 23· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 7th▼ 16· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), male (%)24.1%Ranked 9th▼ 27· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 18th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, both sexes (%)22.6%Ranked 5th▼ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, female (%)22.6%Ranked 7th▼ 16· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, male (%)22.6%Ranked 4th▼ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)82.3%Ranked 1st▼ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, female (%)82.1%Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, male (%)82.4%Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, both sexes (%)25.6%Ranked 9th▼ 20· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, female (%)26.7%Ranked 9th▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, male (%)24.5%Ranked 9th▼ 19· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 20th▼ 26· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)24.2%Ranked 35th▼ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, female (%)25.6%Ranked 34th▼ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, male (%)22.7%Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 20th▼ 26· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)16.6%Ranked 33rd▼ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, female (%)16.7%Ranked 32nd▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, male (%)16.5%Ranked 33rd▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.8%Ranked 12th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 75 years old or over, male (%)0.7%Ranked 15th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 22nd▼ 17· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.3Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, both sexes (%)14.9%Ranked 42nd▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, female (%)15.2%Ranked 38th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.26Ranked 29th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, male (%)14.6%Ranked 38th▲ 11· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.34Ranked 27th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.83Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, both sexes (%)5.3%Ranked 30th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, female (%)4.8%Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, male (%)5.8%Ranked 27th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)2.2%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, female (%)2.2%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, male (%)2.3%Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 14th▼ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, both sexes (%)17.9%Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, female (%)18.5%Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, male (%)17.3%Ranked 24th▲ 4· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.73Ranked 23rd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)2.2%Ranked 25th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, female (%)1.9%Ranked 22nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 15-24 years old, male (%)2.6%Ranked 24th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 23rd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)1%Ranked 24th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, female (%)0.7%Ranked 22nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, 25-74 years old, male (%)1.4%Ranked 22nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.62Ranked 27th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.15Ranked 19th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, both sexes (%)1.1%Ranked 35th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, female (%)0.8%Ranked 25th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.2Ranked 16th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, male (%)1.3%Ranked 26th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.12Ranked 16th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 18th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, female (%)0.2%Ranked 15th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, rural, male (%)0.2%Ranked 16th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.3%Ranked 3rd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, under 15 years old, female (%)0.2%Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, under 15 years old, male (%)0.4%Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.59Ranked 17th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, both sexes (%)1.3%Ranked 19th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, female (%)1%Ranked 16th· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, urban, male (%)1.7%Ranked 17th· 2021
- Public spending on education as a share of GDP2.8%Ranked 88th▼ 44· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary (headcount basis)19.5Ranked 31st▲ 9· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in primary education24.4Ranked 45th▲ 5· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in primary education (headcount basis)24.4Ranked 45th▲ 5· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in secondary (headcount basis)16.3Ranked 40th▲ 12· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary (headcount basis)13.4Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2023
- Pupils below minimum reading proficiency at end of primary (%). Low GAML threshold41.4Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2021
- Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary21.3Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2017
- Pupil-teacher ratio, preprimary26.9Ranked 16th▲ 7· 2005
- Pupil-teacher ratio, primary28.5Ranked 30th▼ 6· 2017
- Pupil-teacher ratio, secondary19Ranked 28th▼ 5· 2017
- Pupil-teacher ratio, tertiary14.8Ranked 48th▼ 3· 2017
- Pupil-teacher ratio, upper secondary16.8Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2017
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education (headcount basis)21.3Ranked 17th▼ 9· 2017
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education (headcount basis)32.5Ranked 15th· 2003
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education (headcount basis)28.5Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2017
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education (headcount basis)19.5Ranked 23rd▼ 7· 2017
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis)17.6Ranked 19th▼ 7· 2017
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)32,157Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, female (number)7,161Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, male (number)24,996Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, both sexes (number)55,689Ranked 19th▲ 7· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, female (number)23,395Ranked 18th▲ 6· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, male (number)32,294Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)23,793Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, female (number)5,803Ranked 24th▼ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, male (number)17,990Ranked 21st▲ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, both sexes (number)21,865Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, female (number)8,696Ranked 27th▲ 7· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, male (number)13,169Ranked 24th—· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)12,975Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, female (number)3,524Ranked 30th▼ 7· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, male (number)9,451Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, both sexes (number)11,685Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, female (number)4,314Ranked 34th▲ 9· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, male (number)7,371Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (number)8,560Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, female (number)3,126Ranked 37th▲ 8· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, male (number)5,434Ranked 34th▲ 4· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of primary education, both sexes (number)5,308Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of primary education, female (number)1,763Ranked 39th▲ 11· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of primary education, male (number)3,545Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of primary education, both sexes (number)4,959Ranked 31st▲ 9· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of primary education, female (number)1,694Ranked 34th▲ 12· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of primary education, male (number)3,265Ranked 30th▲ 5· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, female (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, male (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in lower secondary general education, all grades, both sexes (number)68,925Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in lower secondary general education, all grades, female (number)16,488Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in lower secondary general education, all grades, male (number)52,437Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number)108,066Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number)42,988Ranked 27th▲ 4· 2023
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, male (number)65,078Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2023
- Repeaters, primary, female (% of female enrollment)1.1Ranked 70th▼ 10· 2017
- Repeaters, primary, male (% of male enrollment)1.6Ranked 69th▼ 12· 2017
- Repeaters, primary, total (% of total enrollment)1.4Ranked 70th▼ 10· 2017
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)2.5%Ranked 45th▼ 29· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, female (%)1.1%Ranked 57th▼ 32· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, male (%)3.7%Ranked 41st▼ 24· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, both sexes (%)3.2%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, female (%)2.8%Ranked 35th▼ 5· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, male (%)3.5%Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)2%Ranked 44th▼ 44· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, female (%)1%Ranked 55th▼ 35· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, male (%)2.9%Ranked 43rd▼ 44· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, both sexes (%)1.5%Ranked 52nd▼ 12· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, female (%)1.2%Ranked 52nd▼ 9· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, male (%)1.7%Ranked 52nd▼ 8· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)1.2%Ranked 53rd▼ 34· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, female (%)0.66%Ranked 60th▼ 25· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, male (%)1.7%Ranked 49th▼ 35· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, both sexes (%)0.82%Ranked 58th▼ 16· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, female (%)0.62%Ranked 59th▼ 15· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, male (%)1%Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (%)0.6%Ranked 64th▼ 19· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, female (%)0.45%Ranked 64th▼ 18· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, male (%)0.75%Ranked 62nd▼ 16· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of primary education, both sexes (%)0.39%Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of primary education, female (%)0.26%Ranked 66th—· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of primary education, male (%)0.5%Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 6 of primary education, both sexes (%)0.37%Ranked 56th▼ 15· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 6 of primary education, female (%)0.26%Ranked 56th▼ 5· 2022
- Repetition rate in Grade 6 of primary education, male (%)0.48%Ranked 55th▼ 7· 2022
- Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), both sexes (%)1.9%Ranked 52nd▼ 40· 2022
- Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%)0.95%Ranked 66th▼ 34· 2022
- Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%)2.8%Ranked 48th▼ 36· 2022
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), both sexes (%)1.2%Ranked 60th▼ 7· 2022
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), female (%)1%Ranked 60th▼ 10· 2022
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), male (%)1.4%Ranked 59th▼ 10· 2022
- Rural population (% of total population)22.3%Ranked 145th▲ 1· 2024
- School age population, early childhood education, both sexes (number)1.29MRanked 53rd▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, early childhood education, female (number)628,473Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, early childhood education, male (number)662,641Ranked 53rd▼ 4· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, both sexes (number)1.48MRanked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, female (number)715,182Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, male (number)759,939Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, both sexes (number)4.17MRanked 17th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, female (number)2.03MRanked 17th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, male (number)2.15MRanked 17th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (number)1.29MRanked 18th▼ 1· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, female (number)628,473Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, male (number)662,641Ranked 18th—· 2025
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, both sexes (number)2.83MRanked 9th—· 2012
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, female (number)1.38MRanked 9th—· 2012
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, male (number)1.45MRanked 9th—· 2012
- School age population, pre-primary education, both sexes (number)1.29MRanked 45th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, female (number)628,473Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, male (number)662,641Ranked 45th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, primary education, both sexes (number)9.05MRanked 14th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, primary education, female (number)4.4MRanked 14th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, primary education, male (number)4.66MRanked 14th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, both sexes (number)8.11MRanked 17th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, female (number)3.94MRanked 17th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, male (number)4.17MRanked 16th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, both sexes (number)6MRanked 17th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, female (number)2.93MRanked 17th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, male (number)3.07MRanked 16th▼ 3· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, both sexes (number)3.94MRanked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, female (number)1.92MRanked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, male (number)2.02MRanked 15th▼ 2· 2025
- School enrollment, preprimary, female (% gross)73.7Ranked 79th▲ 2· 2020
- School enrollment, preprimary (% gross)72.5Ranked 83rd▲ 4· 2020
- School enrollment, preprimary, male (% gross)71.3Ranked 83rd▲ 5· 2020
- School enrollment, primary and secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1Ranked 23rd▼ 5· 2020
- School enrollment, primary, female (% gross)102Ranked 62nd▼ 5· 2023
- School enrollment, primary, female (% net)97.5Ranked 17th—· 2012
- School enrollment, primary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1.1Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2020
- School enrollment, primary, male (% gross)101.9Ranked 68th▼ 14· 2023
- School enrollment, primary, male (% net)98.3Ranked 5th▼ 10· 2012
- School enrollment, primary (% net)99.7Ranked 4th—· 2017
- School enrollment, primary, private (% of total primary)15.2Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, female (% gross)86.2Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, female (% net)80.4Ranked 71st▼ 1· 2017
- School enrollment, secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)0.99Ranked 81st▼ 19· 2020
- School enrollment, secondary, male (% gross)84.2Ranked 99th▲ 1· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, male (% net)82.3Ranked 63rd▲ 4· 2017
- School enrollment, secondary (% net)81.4Ranked 73rd▼ 1· 2017
- School enrollment, secondary, private (% of total secondary)12.3Ranked 64th▼ 5· 2023
- School enrollment, tertiary, female (% gross)59.1Ranked 70th▼ 4· 2022
- School enrollment, tertiary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1Ranked 106th▲ 3· 2022
- School enrollment, tertiary, male (% gross)58.3Ranked 41st▼ 10· 2022
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 23rd▼ 49· 2012
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, both sexes (years)0.98Ranked 5th▼ 14· 2012
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, female (years)1.1Ranked 4th▼ 32· 2012
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, male (years)0.86Ranked 5th—· 2012
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▼ 19· 2020
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, both sexes (years)0.67Ranked 146th▲ 4· 2020
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, female (years)0.68Ranked 143rd▲ 3· 2020
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, male (years)0.66Ranked 142nd▲ 3· 2020
- School life expectancy, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 54th▲ 15· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 49th▼ 10· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (years)8.9Ranked 75th▼ 14· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female (years)8.9Ranked 76th▼ 9· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, male (years)8.9Ranked 82nd▼ 10· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 54th▼ 11· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, both sexes (years)11.2Ranked 94th▼ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, female (years)11.3Ranked 90th▼ 8· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, male (years)11.1Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, both sexes (years)6.1Ranked 62nd▼ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, female (years)6.1Ranked 59th▼ 7· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, male (years)6.1Ranked 65th▼ 8· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 81st▲ 5· 2022
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, both sexes (years)14.1Ranked 69th▼ 2· 2022
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, female (years)14.2Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2022
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, male (years)14Ranked 64th▼ 4· 2022
- School life expectancy, secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 63rd▼ 14· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, both sexes (years)5.1Ranked 104th▼ 4· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, female (years)5.2Ranked 103rd▼ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, male (years)5Ranked 100th▼ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 106th▲ 5· 2022
- School life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes (years)2.9Ranked 60th▼ 6· 2022
- School life expectancy, tertiary, female (years)3Ranked 72nd▼ 5· 2022
- School life expectancy, tertiary, male (years)2.9Ranked 40th▼ 12· 2022
- Secondary education, duration (years)6Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Secondary education, general pupils4.92MRanked 19th—· 2017
- Secondary education, general pupils (% female)50.2Ranked 66th▼ 15· 2017
- Secondary education, pupils6.62MRanked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Secondary education, pupils (% female)48Ranked 104th▼ 6· 2017
- Secondary education, teachers406,399Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Secondary education, teachers (% female)49.3Ranked 106th▼ 1· 2023
- Secondary education, teachers, female200,449Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Secondary education, vocational pupils763,440Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2017
- Secondary education, vocational pupils (% female)34Ranked 106th▲ 7· 2017
- Share of 25-64 year olds with incomplete tertiary education24.4%Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2020
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 28th▲ 2· 2020
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 52nd▲ 5· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)0%Ranked 46th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)0%Ranked 46th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2012
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2012
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2012
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2012
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)83.8%Ranked 78th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)87%Ranked 64th▲ 12· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)80.6%Ranked 69th▲ 9· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.67Ranked 73rd▲ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)16.2%Ranked 53rd▲ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)13%Ranked 53rd—· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)19.4%Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2022
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)39.9%Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)40.1%Ranked 13th—· 2022
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)39.7%Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2022
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)60.1%Ranked 10th—· 2022
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)59.9%Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2022
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)60.3%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 23rd—· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)63%Ranked 79th▲ 3· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)70.8%Ranked 63rd▲ 9· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)55.2%Ranked 76th▲ 10· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)37%Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)29.2%Ranked 52nd▲ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)44.8%Ranked 39th—· 2023
- Share of children achieving minimum math proficiency by the end of lower secondary age26%Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Share of children achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of primary age56.2%Ranked 38th▲ 9· 2021
- Share of population with no education9.2%Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2020
- Share of population with some formal education90.8%Ranked 50th▲ 2· 2020
- Share of primary schools with single-sex sanitation facilities100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of primary school teachers who are women76.6%Ranked 92nd▲ 9· 2023
- Share of students achieving minimum math proficiency by the end of primary education31.2%Ranked 46th▼ 2· 2023
- Share of students achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of primary education58.6%Ranked 47th▲ 11· 2021
- Share of students at the end of lower-secondary education with minimum math proficiency29%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of students at the end of primary education with minimum math proficiency31%Ranked 34th▼ 12· 2023
- Share of students studying abroad2.6%Ranked 86th▲ 2· 2022
- Share of the population aged 25+ years with lower secondary education65.1%Ranked 62nd▼ 8· 2023
- Share of the population aged 25+ years with post-secondary education or higher45.7%Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of young women not in education, employment or training37.8%Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training25.7%Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2023
- SSP1 scenario1.1Ranked 46th▼ 4· 2100
- Start month of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non-tertiary education)9Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2025
- Start month of the academic school year (tertiary education)9Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Start of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non tertiary education)2,024Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Start of the academic school year (tertiary education)2,021Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Students in lower-secondary, math29%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 46th▼ 44· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (%)96.8%Ranked 48th▲ 21· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, female (%)96.7%Ranked 41st▼ 2· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male (%)97%Ranked 35th▲ 19· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 40th▼ 38· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, both sexes (%)96.2%Ranked 29th—· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, female (%)95.7%Ranked 28th▼ 16· 2022
- Survival rate to Grade 5 of primary education, male (%)96.6%Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2022
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education,adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 46th▼ 45· 2022
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%)94.7%Ranked 39th▼ 6· 2022
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, female (%)94.4%Ranked 36th▼ 21· 2022
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, male (%)94.9%Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2022
- Teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes (number)190,117Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- Teachers in lower secondary education, female (number)91,356Ranked 19th—· 2023
- Teachers in lower secondary education, male (number)98,761Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Teachers in pre-primary education, both sexes (number)18,547Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2005
- Teachers in pre-primary education, female (number)16,589Ranked 32nd—· 2005
- Teachers in pre-primary education, male (number)1,958Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2005
- Teachers in primary education, both sexes (number)372,396Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Teachers in primary education, female (number)285,113Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Teachers in primary education, male (number)87,283Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number)406,399Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Teachers in secondary education, female (number)200,449Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Teachers in secondary education, male (number)205,950Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes (number)136,515Ranked 2nd—· 2012
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, female (number)42,189Ranked 2nd—· 2012
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, male (number)94,326Ranked 2nd—· 2012
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7, and 8 programmes, both sexes (number)119,081Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2012
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7, and 8 programmes, female (number)26,551Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2012
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7, and 8 programmes, male (number)92,530Ranked 1st—· 2012
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, both sexes (number)230,289Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2020
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, female (number)78,291Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2020
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, male (number)151,998Ranked 4th—· 2020
- Teachers in upper secondary education, both sexes (number)216,282Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Teachers in upper secondary education, female (number)109,093Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Teachers in upper secondary education, male (number)107,189Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in lower secondary public institutions (%)82.4%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in post-secondary non-tertiary public institutions (%)26.2%Ranked 21st—· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in pre-primary public institutions (%)55.8%Ranked 23rd▼ 6· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in primary public institutions (%)74.5%Ranked 13th▼ 4· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)70.2%Ranked 9th▼ 6· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in secondary public institutions (%)82.4%Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)48.3%Ranked 16th▼ 7· 2022
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%)82.5%Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2022
- Tertiary education, academic staff (% female)34Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2020
- Theoretical duration of early childhood education (years)1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of lower secondary education (years)3Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of post-secondary non-tertiary education (years)2Ranked 3rd—· 2012
- Theoretical duration of pre-primary education (years)1Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of primary education (years)6Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of secondary education (years)6Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of upper secondary education (years)3Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Total debt service (% of GNI)0.09%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, both sexes (number)130,591Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2022
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, female (number)39,486Ranked 16th▼ 5· 2022
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, male (number)91,105Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2022
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 40th▼ 46· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes (%)92.4%Ranked 85th▼ 16· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female (%)92.8%Ranked 58th▼ 12· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male (%)92.1%Ranked 59th▼ 1· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, both sexes (%)99.9%Ranked 7th▼ 9· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, female (%)98.5%Ranked 26th▲ 8· 2020
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, male (%)97.9%Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2020
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 56th▼ 10· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes (%)77.5%Ranked 90th—· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female (%)79.3%Ranked 84th▲ 3· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male (%)75.9%Ranked 78th▲ 4· 2023
- Total number of indoor cinemas339Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2017
- Total official flows for scholarships, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)31.31MRanked 8th▲ 2· 2023
- Total official flows for scholarships, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)30.4Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2024
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)99,161Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, female (UIS estimate) (number)46,051Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, male (UIS estimate) (number)53,110Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Total per capita public expenditure at national/federal level on cultural and natural heritage (constant PPP$ - 2017)0Ranked 42nd· 2022
- Total per capita public expenditure on cultural and natural heritage (constant PPP$ - 2017)0Ranked 48th· 2022
- Total population (thousands)92,020.7Ranked 17th—· 2025
- Trained teachers in lower secondary education, female (% of female teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Trained teachers in lower secondary education, male (% of male teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Trained teachers in lower secondary education (% of total teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Trained teachers in preprimary education (% of total teachers)79.3Ranked 12th· 2003
- Trained teachers in primary education, female (% of female teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Trained teachers in primary education, male (% of male teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Trained teachers in primary education (% of total teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Trained teachers in secondary education, female (% of female teachers)97.8Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2017
- Trained teachers in secondary education, male (% of male teachers)97.2Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2017
- Trained teachers in secondary education (% of total teachers)97.5Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2017
- Trained teachers in upper secondary education, female (% of female teachers)95.7Ranked 8th—· 2017
- Trained teachers in upper secondary education, male (% of male teachers)94.5Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2017
- Trained teachers in upper secondary education (% of total teachers)95.1Ranked 8th—· 2017
- Volume of official development assistance flows for scholarships, constant US$29.41MRanked 7th▼ 1· 2024
- Years of schooling10.6Ranked 65th▼ 15· 2020
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, both sexes (number)247,083Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2016
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, % female53Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2016
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, female (number)131,849Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2016
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, male (number)115,233Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, adjusted gender parity index (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (GPIA)1Ranked 7th· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, both sexes (%)98.7%Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, both sexes (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)98.9%Ranked 8th· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, female (%)98.6%Ranked 20th▼ 6· 2023
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, female (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)99.1%Ranked 7th· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, male (%)98.9%Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2023
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, male (estimate using the Global Age-Specific Literacy Projections Model) (%)98.8%Ranked 8th· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, both sexes (%)96.4%Ranked 26th▲ 6· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, female (%)95.8%Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, male (%)96.9%Ranked 22nd▲ 6· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, both sexes (%)98.7%Ranked 24th—· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, female (%)98.7%Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2016
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, male (%)98.8%Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2016
Population
- Population92.42MRanked 17th—· 2025
- Population growth0.92%Ranked 105th▲ 2· 2025
- Urban population77.4%Ranked 58th▲ 1· 2025
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 130th▲ 7· 2024
- Crude birth rate12.6Ranked 112th▼ 1· 2024
- 1.3.1 - [ILO] Proportion of population covered by at least one social protection benefit, by sex (%) - SI_COV_BENFTS - Both sexes100%Ranked 1st▼ 73· 2023
- <1 year0.01Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2021
- 2G98%Ranked 31st▼ 11· 2023
- 3.6.1 - Death rate due to road traffic injuries, by sex (per 100,000 population) - SH_STA_TRAF - Both sexes21.5Ranked 89th▼ 5· 2019
- Above $10 a day49.09MRanked 4th▼ 8· 2022
- Above $10 a day46.53MRanked 9th▼ 5· 2023
- Above $40 a day1.79MRanked 23rd▼ 9· 2023
- Above $40 a day1.79MRanked 23rd▼ 9· 2023
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, female (% of population ages 15+)86.8Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, male (% of population ages 15+)95.3Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider (% of population ages 15+)91.1Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider (% of population ages 15+)91.1%Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, older adults (% of population ages 25+)90.9Ranked 38th—· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, poorest 40% (% of population ages 15+)86.9Ranked 32nd▼ 5· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, richest 60% (% of population ages 15+)93.9Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, young adults (% of population ages 15-24)91.8Ranked 22nd▼ 8· 2024
- Adolescent birth rate (per 1,000 women aged 15-19 and 10-14 years) - 10 to 14 years old0.42Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2021
- Adolescent fertility rate (births per 1,000 women ages 15-19)25.8Ranked 111th▼ 3· 2024
- Adoscent birth rate23.4Ranked 43rd▼ 10· 2021
- Age dependency ratio (% of working-age population)44.1Ranked 184th▼ 1· 2025
- Age dependency ratio, old (% of working-age population)12.4Ranked 113th▼ 2· 2025
- Age dependency ratio, young (% of working-age population)31.7Ranked 113th—· 2025
- Age-standardized death rate from self-inflicted injuries per 100,000 population - Sex: Both sexes - Age group: all ages5Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2017
- Alcohol, abstainers lifetime (%), age-standardized - Sex: both sexes97%Ranked 8th—· 2020
- Alcohol use disorders, 12-month prevalence (%) - Both sexes1%Ranked 70th· 2016
- Annual change in population1.08MRanked 18th▲ 3· 2023
- Annual growth rate of the share of population in cities with 300,000 or more people0.46%Ranked 85th▲ 8· 2020
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, bottom 40% of population (%)1.7%Ranked 21st· 2023
- Armed forces personnel (% of total population)0.74%Ranked 33rd—· 2020
- Average annual rate of change of the urban share0.46%Ranked 85th▲ 2· 2025
- Babies per woman, total fertility1.6Ranked 52nd▲ 4· 2100
- Below $30 per day86.65MRanked 4th▼ 5· 2023
- Below $3 a day2.26MRanked 7th▼ 8· 2023
- Below working age20.35MRanked 19th—· 2025
- Birth rate13Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2023
- Birth rate13Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2023
- Birth rate13Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2023
- Births613.4Ranked 42nd—· 2100
- Births151910.1Ranked 59th▼ 1· 2100
- CBR7.7Ranked 162nd—· 2100
- CDR14.1Ranked 66th—· 2100
- Census based on population register within 10 years0Ranked 2nd—· 2015
- Census was run within 10 years1Ranked 1st—· 2015
- Central death rate at birth9.4Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2023
- Central death rate at birth10.5Ranked 93rd▼ 1· 2023
- Central death rate at birth9.4Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2023
- Central death rate at birth10Ranked 98th▼ 1· 2023
- CNMR-0.31Ranked 122nd—· 2100
- Completeness of birth registration (%)98.6Ranked 8th· 2010
- Completeness of birth registration, female (%)98.6Ranked 3rd· 2010
- Completeness of birth registration, male (%)98.7Ranked 2nd· 2010
- Completeness of birth registration, rural (%)98.1Ranked 6th· 2010
- Completeness of birth registration, urban (%)98.9Ranked 5th· 2010
- Completeness of death registration with cause-of-death information (%)90Ranked 10th▲ 9· 2016
- Condoms distributed and sold per 1,000 population86.2Ranked 72nd▼ 9· 2024
- Contraceptive prevalence, any method (% of married women ages 15-49)77.4%Ranked 5th—· 2010
- Contraceptive prevalence, any method (% of married women ages 15-49)77.4Ranked 5th—· 2010
- Contraceptive prevalence, any modern method (% of married women ages 15-49)57Ranked 11th▲ 7· 2010
- Contraceptive prevalence, any modern method (% of married women ages 15-49)57%Ranked 11th▲ 7· 2010
- Countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Couple with children0%Ranked 57th▲ 14· 2011
- Coverage of social protection and labor programs (% of population)89.9%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2020
- Coverage of social protection and labor programs (% of population)89.9Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2020
- Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population)96.1Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population)94.3Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile (% of population)90.6Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population)89.8Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2020
- Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile (% of population)78.6Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2020
- Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population)89.9Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Crude death rate: the share of the population that dies each year0.59Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2021
- Death rate4.7Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2023
- Death rate, crude (per 1,000 people)4.8Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2024
- Deaths1,127.4Ranked 196th▲ 2· 2100
- DeathsFemale549.6Ranked 196th▲ 1· 2100
- DeathsMale577.7Ranked 196th—· 2100
- Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79)9%Ranked 70th▲ 45· 2024
- DoublingTime137Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2030
- Effective reproductive fertility rate1.7Ranked 131st—· 2023
- Emigrant stock share (% of population)1.9Ranked 147th▼ 4· 2024
- Employment rate37.6%Ranked 168th▲ 1· 2025
- Female90.2%Ranked 63rd▲ 1· 2024
- Female90.2%Ranked 63rd▲ 1· 2024
- Female employment rate12.1%Ranked 91st▼ 17· 2024
- Female employment rate12.1%Ranked 103rd▼ 7· 2024
- Female employment rate11.8%Ranked 174th▼ 2· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate14.1%Ranked 102nd▼ 8· 2024
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 130th▲ 7· 2024
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 130th▲ 7· 2024
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate among adolescent girls aged 15 to 1926.2Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman1.7Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Growth rate among the total population-0.98%Ranked 31st· 2022
- Historical estimates90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Historical numeracy estimates65.9%Ranked 85th▼ 8· 1930
- Homicide rate in both sexes in age 0-19 per 100,000 population0.74Ranked 51st▼ 9· 2017
- Homicide rate in both sexes in all ages per 100,000 population2.4Ranked 56th▼ 10· 2017
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2.4Ranked 57th▼ 6· 2014
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2.4Ranked 57th▼ 6· 2014
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2.4Ranked 57th▼ 5· 2014
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population2.4Ranked 57th▼ 6· 2014
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of female victims0.56Ranked 22nd▼ 6· 2014
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims4.1Ranked 55th▲ 1· 2014
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims4.1Ranked 55th▲ 1· 2014
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population where the weapon was a firearm0.37Ranked 23rd▼ 7· 2015
- Illiterate11.1%Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2023
- IMR1.7Ranked 133rd▼ 2· 2100
- Incidence of malaria (per 1,000 population at risk)2.2Ranked 20th▼ 5· 2024
- InfantDeaths1.1Ranked 103rd▼ 2· 2100
- International migrant stock (% of population)4.2Ranked 106th▼ 1· 2024
- Land use: Built-up area8,280.6Ranked 17th—· 2025
- LBsurvivingAge1612.5Ranked 42nd—· 2100
- LE1574.5Ranked 56th—· 2100
- LE15Female75.4Ranked 69th—· 2100
- LE15Male73.7Ranked 51st—· 2100
- LE6525.6Ranked 62nd—· 2100
- LE65Female26.2Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2100
- LE65Male24.9Ranked 55th▲ 1· 2100
- LE8012.6Ranked 70th—· 2100
- LE80Female13.1Ranked 80th—· 2100
- LE80Male12.1Ranked 62nd—· 2100
- Less than $3 a day2.5%Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2023
- LEx89.3Ranked 57th—· 2100
- LExFemale90.1Ranked 70th—· 2100
- LExMale88.5Ranked 52nd—· 2100
- Life expectancy at birth, female (years)79.8Ranked 80th▼ 5· 2024
- Life expectancy at birth, male (years)76Ranked 54th▲ 1· 2024
- MAC31.2Ranked 90th▲ 3· 2100
- Male employment rate62.7%Ranked 115th—· 2025
- Mean age at childbearing28.8Ranked 127th▼ 3· 2023
- Median age32.9Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2023
- Median age32.9Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2023
- MedianAgePop51.9Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2100
- Military personnel as a share of total population0.65%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2016
- Modern method57%Ranked 11th▲ 7· 2010
- Mortality rate, adult, female (per 1,000 female adults)56.4Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Mortality rate, adult, male (per 1,000 male adults)106.7Ranked 41st▼ 10· 2024
- Mortality rate, infant, female (per 1,000 live births)9.7Ranked 49th▼ 2· 2024
- Mortality rate, infant, male (per 1,000 live births)10.9Ranked 50th▼ 4· 2024
- NatChange-514Ranked 207th—· 2100
- NatChangeRT-6.4Ranked 157th—· 2100
- Natural population growth rate0.83%Ranked 108th—· 2023
- Natural population growth rate0.83%Ranked 108th—· 2023
- Natural population growth rate0.83%Ranked 108th—· 2023
- Net migration116,786Ranked 14th▲ 6· 2025
- NetMigrations-24.4Ranked 181st▲ 2· 2100
- NRR0.8Ranked 126th▲ 1· 2100
- Number of 1-year-old girls584,341Ranked 24th—· 2023
- Number of births1.17MRanked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Number of births1.17MRanked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Number of births to women aged 50 to 54169Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2023
- Number of boys under 53.18MRanked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 1520.69MRanked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 1520.69MRanked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 56.2MRanked 23rd▲ 2· 2023
- Number of children under 53.09MRanked 43rd▲ 1· 2100
- Number of children under 56.2MRanked 23rd▲ 2· 2023
- Number of cities with 1 to 5 million people8Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2035
- Number of cities with 300000 to 500000 people16Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2035
- Number of cities with 500000 to 1 million people12Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2035
- Number of cities with 5 to 10 million people0Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2035
- Number of cities with more than 10 million people1Ranked 4th—· 2035
- Number of cities with more than 1 million people9Ranked 11th—· 2035
- Number of deaths423,371Ranked 190th—· 2023
- Number of deaths423,371Ranked 190th—· 2023
- Number of deaths423,371Ranked 190th—· 2023
- Number of deaths423,371Ranked 190th—· 2023
- Number of deaths among people aged 100 and over178Ranked 65th▲ 2· 2023
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)0.01Ranked 2nd▼ 8· 2011
- Number of emigrants1.73MRanked 47th▼ 3· 2024
- Number of girls under 53.02MRanked 23rd▲ 2· 2023
- Number of homicide victims among children (0-19) per 100,000 population2Ranked 4th· 2015
- Number of people aged 65 and over7.17MRanked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of people aged 65 and over7.17MRanked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of people aged 65 and over7.17MRanked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Number of people in poverty ($3 a day)2.26MRanked 48th▼ 6· 2023
- Number of people in poverty ($3 a day)2.26MRanked 48th▼ 6· 2023
- Old-age dependency ratio11.4%Ranked 115th▲ 2· 2023
- Old-age dependency ratio11.4%Ranked 115th▲ 2· 2023
- Open defecation0Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- Outsurvival statistic at birth41.9%Ranked 54th▲ 4· 2023
- People at risk of trachoma0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- PopChange-538.4Ranked 209th—· 2100
- PopDensity49.1Ranked 158th—· 2100
- PopGrowthRate-0.67Ranked 152nd—· 2100
- PopSexRatio102Ranked 46th—· 2100
- Population90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Population80.05MRanked 30th—· 2100
- Population90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Population90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Population90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Population79.91MRanked 30th—· 2100
- Population90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Population90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Population90.61MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Population ages 00-04, female (% of female population)6.3Ranked 120th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 00-04, male (% of male population)6.4Ranked 119th▲ 3· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, female9.9MRanked 20th—· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, female (% of female population)21.8Ranked 113th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, male10.46MRanked 20th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, male (% of male population)22.3Ranked 111th—· 2025
- Population ages 0-14 (% of total population)22Ranked 109th—· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, total20.35MRanked 20th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 05-09, female (% of female population)7.7Ranked 108th▲ 4· 2025
- Population ages 05-09, male (% of male population)7.9Ranked 108th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 10-14, female (% of female population)7.8Ranked 117th▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 10-14, male (% of male population)8Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-19, female (% of female population)7Ranked 127th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-19, male (% of male population)7.1Ranked 130th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, female31.49MRanked 16th—· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, female (% of female population)69.3Ranked 26th—· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, male32.64MRanked 16th—· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, male (% of male population)69.5Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)69.4Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, total64.14MRanked 16th—· 2025
- Population ages 20-24, female (% of female population)6.3Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 20-24, male (% of male population)6.4Ranked 154th—· 2025
- Population ages 25-29, female (% of female population)6.5Ranked 142nd▲ 6· 2025
- Population ages 25-29, male (% of male population)6.5Ranked 159th▲ 8· 2025
- Population ages 30-34, female (% of female population)8.1Ranked 40th▲ 21· 2025
- Population ages 30-34, male (% of male population)8.2Ranked 47th▲ 17· 2025
- Population ages 35-39, female (% of female population)9.7Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 35-39, male (% of male population)9.8Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 40-44, female (% of female population)9.4Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 40-44, male (% of male population)9.4Ranked 12th—· 2025
- Population ages 45-49, female (% of female population)7.2Ranked 29th▼ 12· 2025
- Population ages 45-49, male (% of male population)7.3Ranked 41st▼ 8· 2025
- Population ages 50-54, female (% of female population)5.9Ranked 99th▼ 6· 2025
- Population ages 50-54, male (% of male population)6Ranked 93rd▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 55-59, female (% of female population)5Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 55-59, male (% of male population)4.9Ranked 113th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 60-64, female (% of female population)4.1Ranked 118th▼ 2· 2025
- Population ages 60-64, male (% of male population)4Ranked 112th—· 2025
- Population ages 65-69, female (% of female population)3.3Ranked 117th—· 2025
- Population ages 65-69, male (% of male population)3.2Ranked 111th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, female4.08MRanked 23rd—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, female (% of female population)9Ranked 117th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, male3.85MRanked 20th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, male (% of male population)8.2Ranked 105th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above (% of total population)8.6Ranked 110th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, total7.93MRanked 21st—· 2025
- Population ages 70-74, female (% of female population)2.6Ranked 109th—· 2025
- Population ages 70-74, male (% of male population)2.5Ranked 100th—· 2025
- Population ages 75-79, female (% of female population)1.6Ranked 107th▼ 5· 2025
- Population ages 75-79, male (% of male population)1.5Ranked 101st▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 80 and above, female (% of female population)1.4Ranked 117th▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 80 and above, male (% of male population)1Ranked 107th▼ 1· 2025
- Population census recently completed1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Population density49.3Ranked 156th—· 2100
- Population, female45.47MRanked 17th—· 2025
- Population, female (% of total population)49.2Ranked 184th▲ 1· 2025
- Population, female (% of total population)49.2%Ranked 182nd▲ 1· 2025
- Population growth rate1.1%Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2023
- Population growth rate-0.67%Ranked 152nd—· 2100
- Population growth rate1.1%Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2023
- Population growth rate-0.67%Ranked 152nd—· 2100
- Population living in cities with 1 million or more people22MRanked 16th—· 2020
- Population living in rural areas13.42MRanked 24th▲ 1· 2020
- Population (Maddison)85,108.2Ranked 18th—· 2022
- Population, male46.95MRanked 17th—· 2025
- Population, male (% of total population)50.8Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2025
- Population (projections)80.05MRanked 30th—· 2100
- Population register implemented0Ranked 2nd—· 2015
- Population share in urban areas76.4%Ranked 52nd—· 2025
- Population, total92.42MRanked 17th—· 2025
- Price level index (Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure)21.2Ranked 162nd▼ 2· 2025
- Prison population rate228Ranked 27th▲ 7· 2020
- Probability of death at birth1%Ranked 93rd▼ 1· 2023
- Probability of death at birth0.93%Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2023
- Probability of death at birth0.93%Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2023
- Projected population density of the capital city8,909.9Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2100
- Projected population of the capital city7.36MRanked 37th▲ 2· 2100
- Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone74.3%Ranked 94th▼ 6· 2023
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 4G mobile network (%)92%Ranked 47th▼ 17· 2023
- Proportion of urban population living in slums (%)44.7%Ranked 39th▲ 12· 2022
- Q00406.6Ranked 152nd—· 2100
- Q0040Female5.9Ranked 142nd—· 2100
- Q0040Male7.1Ranked 156th▲ 1· 2100
- Q006020.8Ranked 172nd—· 2100
- Q0060Female17.4Ranked 158th—· 2100
- Q0060Male24Ranked 182nd—· 2100
- Q15508.2Ranked 167th—· 2100
- Q1550Female6.7Ranked 157th—· 2100
- Q1550Male9.7Ranked 171st—· 2100
- Q156018.3Ranked 175th▼ 1· 2100
- Q1560Female14.8Ranked 164th—· 2100
- Q1560Male21.7Ranked 180th▼ 1· 2100
- Q52.1Ranked 137th—· 2100
- Ratio for female members of parliaments (Ratio of the proportion of women in parliament in the proportion of women in the national population with the age of eligibility as a lower bound boundary), Lower Chamber or Unicameral0.1Ranked 73rd▼ 8· 2025
- Refugees by country of asylum3.49MRanked 1st—· 2024
- Refugees by country of origin158,166Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2024
- Replacement fertility rate2.1Ranked 40th▼ 11· 2010
- Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)43.7%Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Rural population20.91MRanked 28th—· 2025
- Rural population13.38MRanked 41st▲ 2· 2050
- Rural population growth (annual %)-0.64Ranked 147th▲ 5· 2025
- Rural population (% of total population)22.6Ranked 149th▼ 1· 2025
- Rural share1.4%Ranked 88th▼ 3· 2016
- Sex ratio at age 100 and over21.5Ranked 86th—· 2023
- Sex ratio at age 5105.6Ranked 65th▲ 1· 2023
- Sex ratio at age 60100.8Ranked 46th▲ 3· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth105.1Ranked 92nd▲ 3· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth105.1Ranked 92nd▲ 3· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth (male births per female births)1.1Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Share in extreme poverty2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of births by mothers aged 10-196.8%Ranked 114th▼ 3· 2023
- Share of city residents with convenient access to public transport (population-weighted)40.4%Ranked 94th· 2020
- Share of deaths with a cause registered90.1%Ranked 11th· 2016
- Share of one person households7.2%Ranked 50th▲ 11· 2011
- Share of population below $1.90 a day (2011 prices)0.33%Ranked 23rd▼ 15· 2022
- Share of population below $3.20 a day (2011 prices)2.5%Ranked 22nd▼ 7· 2022
- Share of population below $5.50 a day (2011 prices)13.1%Ranked 21st▼ 5· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($10 a day)48.8%Ranked 45th▼ 8· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($1.90 a day)0.33%Ranked 5th▼ 23· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($1 a day)0.03%Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($2.15 a day)0.47%Ranked 7th▼ 27· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($30 a day)94.8%Ranked 13th▼ 34· 2022
- Share of population in poverty ($30 a day)95.4%Ranked 45th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($40 a day)98%Ranked 45th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($4.20 a day)7.5%Ranked 42nd▼ 4· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($8.30 a day)36%Ranked 43rd▼ 9· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($8.30 a day)36%Ranked 43rd▼ 9· 2023
- Share of population in poverty (40% of the median)6.9%Ranked 25th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of population in poverty (50% of the median)12.6%Ranked 28th▼ 9· 2023
- Share of population in poverty (60% of the median)19.6%Ranked 30th▼ 10· 2023
- Share of population living in cities60.6%Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2020
- Share of population living in cities60.6%Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2020
- Share of population living in extreme poverty2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of population living in rural areas15.3%Ranked 169th▼ 5· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas77.4%Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas77.4%Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas77.4%Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas84.7%Ranked 47th▲ 5· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas77.4%Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas84.7%Ranked 47th▲ 5· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas77.4%Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas77.4%Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas84.7%Ranked 47th▲ 5· 2020
- Share of population with suffrage100%Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Share of the population born in another country4.2%Ranked 122nd▼ 6· 2024
- Share of the population living with HIV0.06%Ranked 131st· 2024
- Share of the population not using improved sanitation facilities0%Ranked 156th▼ 4· 2024
- Share of the population practicing open defecation0.4%Ranked 110th—· 2016
- Share of the population using at least basic sanitation90.5%Ranked 96th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of the population using improved sanitation facilities100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of the population using the Internet79.6%Ranked 93rd▲ 9· 2023
- Share of the population who are Christians0.14%Ranked 188th▼ 1· 2020
- Share of the population who are not religious0%Ranked 191st—· 2020
- Share of the population who are religious100%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Share of the population who cannot afford sufficient calories1.7%Ranked 95th· 2021
- Share of the rural population using at least basic sanitation82.3%Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2024
- Share of the urban population using at least basic sanitation92.8%Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of the urban population using safely managed sanitation75.3%Ranked 40th—· 2024
- Share of total population living in cities with 1 million or more people25.1%Ranked 53rd▲ 5· 2020
- Share of total population living in the capital city10.1%Ranked 126th▼ 3· 2020
- Share of urban population living in the largest city12%Ranked 155th▼ 3· 2020
- Sites providing TB diagnostic services using molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostics per million population0.46Ranked 135th▼ 6· 2023
- Specialist surgical workforce (per 100,000 population)5Ranked 80th· 2014
- SRB104.8Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2100
- Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort)90.2Ranked 65th▲ 1· 2024
- Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)83.8%Ranked 56th—· 2024
- Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)83.8Ranked 58th—· 2024
- Technicians in R&D (per million people)496.8Ranked 20th▼ 19· 2017
- TFR1.6Ranked 128th▼ 1· 2100
- Total deaths and disappearances recorded during migration (number)1,493Ranked 48th▲ 4· 2024
- Total dependency ratio44.4%Ranked 182nd▲ 4· 2023
- Total dependency ratio44.4%Ranked 182nd▲ 4· 2023
- Total fertility rate1.7Ranked 130th▲ 7· 2024
- Total number of international immigrants3.84MRanked 17th▼ 5· 2024
- TPopulation1Jan80,314.5Ranked 30th—· 2100
- TPopulation1July80,045.3Ranked 30th—· 2100
- TPopulationFemale1July39,627.9Ranked 32nd—· 2100
- TPopulationMale1July40,417.4Ranked 30th—· 2100
- Under5Deaths1.3Ranked 104th▼ 3· 2100
- Unmet need for contraception (% of married women ages 15-49)5.7Ranked 27th· 2010
- Unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population (%) - Both sexes25.1%Ranked 54th· 2014
- Urban population71.51MRanked 12th—· 2025
- Urban population71.51MRanked 12th—· 2025
- Urban population growth (annual %)1.4Ranked 102nd▲ 5· 2025
- Urban population living in slums30.54MRanked 6th▲ 3· 2022
- Urban share92.8%Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2024
- Using improved sanitation facilities91.57MRanked 15th—· 2024
- Voter turnout of voting-age population38.8%Ranked 47th▲ 9· 2024
- Women's share of population ages 15+ living with HIV (%)24.1%Ranked 127th▼ 1· 2024
- Women who were first married by age 15 (% of women ages 20-24)2.7Ranked 8th· 2010
- Women who were first married by age 18 (% of women ages 20-24)16.7Ranked 11th· 2010
- Youth dependency ratio33%Ranked 112th▲ 1· 2023
- Median age of population32.9Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2023
- Total age dependency ratio44.4Ranked 183rd▲ 4· 2023
- Net migration rate2.9Ranked 51st▼ 5· 2023
- Projected population in 2050 (medium)101,862Ranked 18th· 2050
- Projected life expectancy in 2050 (medium)82.7Ranked 62nd· 2050
Electricity access
- Electricity access100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Renewable energy share0.9%Ranked 166th▼ 4· 2021
- Forest area6.6%Ranked 175th—· 2023
- Electric power consumption3,814.5Ranked 57th▼ 3· 2023
- CO₂ per capita8.7Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions792.63MRanked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Renewable electricity3.8%Ranked 86th▼ 66· 2025
- Actions to tackle climate change91.3%Ranked 29th· 2024
- Adjusted net savings, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)11.57BRanked 93rd▲ 1· 2000
- Adjusted net savings per capita, excluding particulate emission damage (current US$)174.2Ranked 66th▼ 2· 2000
- Agriculture16.77MRanked 28th▲ 2· 2023
- Agriculture23.1MRanked 37th▲ 2· 2023
- Agriculture39.87MRanked 33rd▲ 2· 2023
- Agriculture — All GHG39.9Ranked 137th—· 2023
- Agriculture — CH423.1Ranked 129th▲ 3· 2023
- Agriculture (farm gate) GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)87,281.7Ranked 185th▼ 2· 2023
- Agriculture — N2O16.8Ranked 127th▼ 7· 2023
- Agriculture sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Annual carbon dioxide emissions9.36MRanked 144th▼ 2· 2026
- Annual CO₂ emissions792.63MRanked 199th▼ 1· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions792.63MRanked 199th▼ 1· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions embedded in trade-121.1MRanked 4th—· 2023
- Annual CO₂ emissions embedded in trade (per capita)-1.3Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Annual CO₂ emissions from cement36.96MRanked 140th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from cement (per capita)0.4Ranked 135th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from coal6.4MRanked 78th▲ 1· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from coal (per capita)0.07Ranked 41st▲ 4· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation104,599.9Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring42.89MRanked 103rd▲ 2· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring (per capita)0.47Ranked 96th▲ 6· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from gas492.66MRanked 123rd—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from gas (per capita)5.4Ranked 115th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from international aviation581,862Ranked 97th▼ 8· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change24.26MRanked 154th▲ 4· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change per capita0.26Ranked 108th▲ 6· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from oil213.73MRanked 194th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from oil (per capita)2.3Ranked 136th▲ 2· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions growth (abs)2.96MRanked 181st▼ 19· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change816.89MRanked 185th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change per capita8.9Ranked 164th▼ 1· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions per GDP (kg per international-$)0.49Ranked 152nd▼ 2· 2022
- Annual consumption-based CO₂ emissions668.58MRanked 112th—· 2023
- Annual consumption-based CO₂ emissions per GDP (kg per international-$)0.4Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2022
- Annual greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry955.17MRanked 189th—· 2024
- Annual greenhouse gas emissions including land use1.01BRanked 190th▲ 1· 2024
- Annual greenhouse gas emissions including land use1.01BRanked 190th▲ 1· 2024
- Annual methane emissions including land use171MRanked 188th—· 2024
- Annual nitrous oxide emissions including land use32.06MRanked 181st—· 2024
- Annual nitrous oxide emissions including land use32.06MRanked 181st—· 2024
- Annual PM2.5 emissions from wildfires28,356.4Ranked 137th▼ 6· 2026
- Annual precipitation212.2Ranked 163rd▲ 3· 2025
- Annual precipitation anomaly-77.7Ranked 124th▲ 30· 2025
- Aquaculture production (metric tons)709,391Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Average price on emissions covered by a carbon tax, weighted by the share of the country's CO₂ emissions0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Average price on emissions covered by an ETS, weighted by the share of the country's CO₂ emissions0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Average surface temperature19.7Ranked 117th▼ 2· 2025
- Aviation and shipping74.9Ranked 97th▲ 3· 2023
- Building — All GHG163.6Ranked 154th▲ 4· 2023
- Building — CH40.79Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2023
- Building — CO2162.7Ranked 142nd▲ 8· 2023
- Building — N2O0.11Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Buildings1,796Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Buildings162.73MRanked 4th—· 2023
- Buildings sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Bunker Fuels — All GHG6.8Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — CH40.01Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — CO26.7Ranked 96th▼ 4· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — N2O0.05Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons)789,229Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide emissions from transport148.49MRanked 162nd▼ 8· 2023
- Carbon intensity0.52Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2024
- Carbon monoxide emissions from all sectors1.25MRanked 162nd▲ 3· 2022
- Carbon price (US$ per tonne of CO₂ in 2025) on covered emissions (which can be economy-wide or sector-specific)0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- CH4 emissions5,740.8Ranked 195th▲ 1· 2023
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions0.02Ranked 191st▲ 1· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and land use0Ranked 146th—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry0.02Ranked 193rd▲ 1· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry0.02Ranked 193rd▲ 1· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by nitrous oxide emissions0Ranked 172nd—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by nitrous oxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry0Ranked 176th—· 2024
- Change in heat-related death rate16Ranked 158th▼ 12· 2090
- Child mortality rate1.1%Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- CO₂ emissions792.63MRanked 199th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita8.7Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita8.7Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita8.7Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita8.7Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita9.1Ranked 180th—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita8.7Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita8.7Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita8.7Ranked 177th▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita Consumption based, tonnes per capita7.7Ranked 150th▲ 2· 2022
- CO₂ emissions per unit energy220.8Ranked 123rd▼ 2· 2024
- Coal0.07Ranked 91st▼ 4· 2024
- Consumption-based emissions7.4Ranked 84th▲ 6· 2023
- Consumption-based emissions per capita7.4Ranked 84th▲ 6· 2023
- Consumption CO₂ emissions, million tonnes654.9Ranked 113th▲ 2· 2020
- Consumption CO₂ emissions, million tonnes679.5Ranked 185th▼ 1· 2022
- Consumption CO₂ emissions, tonnes per capita7.5Ranked 86th▲ 8· 2020
- Consumption emissions per capita from Global Carbon Project8Ranked 133rd▲ 1· 2022
- Covered by a carbon tax or an emissions trading system0%Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions21.81BRanked 191st—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions21.81BRanked 191st—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement862.37MRanked 142nd—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal243.28MRanked 73rd—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring1.74BRanked 120th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from gas8.99BRanked 124th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change2.41BRanked 128th—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil9.98BRanked 192nd—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change23.45BRanked 172nd▲ 1· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions, total16.75BRanked 177th▲ 1· 2022
- Death rate1,360.7Ranked 150th▲ 1· 2090
- Decadal average surface temperature18.9Ranked 118th▼ 1· 2010
- Decadal temperature anomaly0.53Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2010
- December1.1Ranked 70th▼ 107· 2025
- Electricity/Heat — All GHG263.1Ranked 156th▲ 1· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — CH40.16Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — CO2262.8Ranked 156th▲ 2· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — N2O0.21Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2023
- Energy — All GHG930.1Ranked 182nd—· 2023
- Energy — CH4161.8Ranked 140th▲ 3· 2023
- Energy — CO2765.2Ranked 179th▼ 2· 2023
- Energy — N2O3.2Ranked 74th▼ 3· 2023
- Fluorinated Gases sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Forestry And Land Use sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Fossil CO2 emissions778,802.3Ranked 199th—· 2023
- Fossil Fuel Operations sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Fossil fuels and industry792.63MRanked 7th▲ 1· 2024
- Fugitive emissions1,753.8Ranked 122nd▲ 1· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — All GHG196.7Ranked 108th▼ 3· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — CH4158.9Ranked 106th▲ 1· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — CO237.8Ranked 59th▲ 5· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- GDP-2.8%Ranked 182nd▲ 96· 2025
- GDP per capita17,484.1Ranked 98th▼ 3· 2024
- GDP per capita18,473.1Ranked 63rd—· 2022
- Government action on climate95.2%Ranked 15th· 2024
- Greenhouse gas emissions from food143.02MRanked 176th▲ 1· 2015
- Gross domestic product (GDP)1.6TRanked 22nd—· 2024
- Heat-related death rate16Ranked 158th▼ 12· 2090
- Industrial Processes — All GHG49.1Ranked 149th▲ 5· 2023
- Industrial Processes — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Industrial Processes — CO239Ranked 118th—· 2023
- Industrial Processes — F-Gas7.5Ranked 109th▲ 5· 2023
- Industrial Processes — N2O2.7Ranked 53rd—· 2023
- January0.24Ranked 99th▼ 7· 2026
- June1.1Ranked 60th▼ 48· 2026
- Land-use change and forestry0Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — All GHG0Ranked 56th▼ 2· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — CH40Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — CO20Ranked 55th—· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — All GHG132.6Ranked 141st▼ 6· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — CH40.08Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — CO2132.4Ranked 146th▼ 2· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — N2O0.09Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Manufacturing sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- March0.07Ranked 130th▲ 73· 2026
- Mineral Extraction sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- N2O emissions112.3Ranked 188th—· 2023
- National Carbon Footprint per capita10Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2020
- Nitrogen oxides emissions from all sectors1.74MRanked 196th▲ 1· 2022
- Oil213.73MRanked 12th—· 2024
- Oil2.3Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2024
- Other fuel combustion21.1MRanked 6th—· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — All GHG21.1Ranked 103rd▲ 4· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — CH40.07Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — CO221Ranked 99th▲ 4· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — N2O0.03Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Per capita carbon dioxide emissions from transport1,638.8Ranked 145th▼ 11· 2023
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation1.1Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation1.1Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from domestic aviation1.1Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from international aviation6.4Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2024
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from international flights, international tourism-adjusted10.5Ranked 13th· 2021
- Per capita CO₂ emissions from international flights, international tourism-adjusted10.5Ranked 13th· 2021
- Per capita consumption-based CO₂ emissions7.4Ranked 84th▲ 6· 2023
- Per capita consumption-based CO₂ emissions7.4Ranked 84th▲ 6· 2023
- Per capita emissions7.4Ranked 84th▲ 6· 2023
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry10.4Ranked 172nd▼ 2· 2024
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels and industry10.4Ranked 173rd▼ 2· 2024
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions including land use11.1Ranked 166th▲ 1· 2024
- Per capita greenhouse gas emissions including land use11.1Ranked 165th—· 2024
- Per capita methane emissions including land use1.9Ranked 162nd—· 2024
- Per capita nitrous oxide emissions including land use0.35Ranked 119th▲ 2· 2024
- Per capita total annual CO₂ emissions from aviation7.5Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Population0.92%Ranked 105th▲ 2· 2025
- Power sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Predicted share willing to give44.3%Ranked 28th· 2024
- See climate change as a serious threat (% of population)44.3Ranked 70th▼ 13· 2021
- See climate change as a somewhat serious threat (% of population)26.9Ranked 48th▼ 6· 2021
- See climate change as a threat (% of population)71.2Ranked 73rd▼ 18· 2021
- Self-reported life satisfaction5.2Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2025
- September1.3Ranked 39th▼ 57· 2025
- Share of annual CO₂ emissions embedded in trade-15.3%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of contribution to global warming1.1%Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of emissions1.8%Ranked 112th—· 2023
- Share of global annual CO₂ consumption-based emissions1.8%Ranked 112th—· 2023
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions2.1%Ranked 199th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from cement2.5%Ranked 140th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from coal0.04%Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from flaring10.3%Ranked 103rd▲ 2· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from gas6.2%Ranked 123rd—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change0.53%Ranked 154th▲ 4· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from oil1.7%Ranked 194th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change1.9%Ranked 185th—· 2024
- Share of global consumption-based emissions1.8%Ranked 112th—· 2023
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions1.2%Ranked 191st—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement1.7%Ranked 142nd—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from coal0.03%Ranked 73rd—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring8.6%Ranked 120th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from gas3.2%Ranked 124th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change0.27%Ranked 128th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil1.6%Ranked 192nd—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change0.85%Ranked 172nd▲ 1· 2024
- Share of global emissions2.1%Ranked 199th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of global greenhouse gas emissions1.9%Ranked 190th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of global methane emissions1.8%Ranked 189th—· 2024
- Share of global nitrous oxide emissions1.1%Ranked 181st—· 2024
- Share of population0.79%Ranked 30th—· 2100
- Share of the global emissions from food0.8%Ranked 176th▲ 1· 2015
- Share of total greenhouse gas emissions that come from food16%Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2015
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates - Sex: both sexes4.8%Ranked 24th▼ 13· 2017
- Sulfur dioxide emissions from all sectors2.19MRanked 200th▲ 2· 2022
- Sulfur dioxide emissions from all sectors2.19MRanked 200th▲ 2· 2022
- Temperature anomaly1.4Ranked 15th▼ 57· 2025
- Temperature anomaly1.4Ranked 15th▼ 57· 2025
- Terrestrial and marine protected areas (% of total territorial area)7Ranked 115th▲ 11· 2025
- Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)7.8Ranked 131st▲ 7· 2025
- Territorial CO₂ emissions, million tonnes744.79MRanked 187th—· 2021
- Territorial CO₂ emissions, million tonnes per capita8.5Ranked 167th▼ 2· 2021
- Territorial emissions792.63MRanked 199th▼ 1· 2024
- Total annual CO₂ emissions from aviation686,461.9Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2024
- Total CH4 emissions7.26MRanked 208th—· 2024
- Total CH4 emissions5,734.2Ranked 196th—· 2023
- Total CO2 emissions794,300Ranked 200th—· 2023
- Total CO2 emissions967.78MRanked 211th—· 2024
- Total excluding LULUCF — All GHG1,046.8Ranked 184th▲ 2· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — CH4197.6Ranked 167th▼ 1· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — CO2804.1Ranked 180th▲ 1· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — F-Gas7.5Ranked 109th▲ 5· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — N2O37.7Ranked 150th▲ 2· 2023
- Total fisheries production (metric tons)1.5MRanked 21st▼ 2· 2024
- Total (fossil fuels and land-use change)816.89MRanked 8th—· 2024
- Total GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Total GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)996,752.7Ranked 197th—· 2023
- Total GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)1MRanked 203rd—· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — All GHG1,046.8Ranked 184th▲ 3· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — CH4197.6Ranked 167th▼ 2· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — CO2804.1Ranked 184th▲ 2· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — F-Gas7.5Ranked 109th▲ 5· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — N2O37.7Ranked 152nd▲ 4· 2023
- Total N2O emissions88,837.2Ranked 197th—· 2024
- Total N2O emissions112.9Ranked 190th▼ 1· 2023
- Transportation — All GHG153Ranked 170th▼ 1· 2023
- Transportation — CH41.8Ranked 44th▼ 5· 2023
- Transportation — CO2148.5Ranked 163rd▼ 8· 2023
- Transportation — N2O2.7Ranked 61st▼ 4· 2023
- Transportation sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Waste — All GHG27.7Ranked 146th▲ 3· 2023
- Waste — CH412.7Ranked 118th▼ 5· 2023
- Waste — N2O15Ranked 70th▲ 1· 2023
- Waste sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)1.23BRanked 210th—· 2024
- Year-on-year change in CO₂ emissions (%)0.37%Ranked 59th▼ 95· 2024
- Electricity from coal0.18%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2025
- Electricity from solar0.23%Ranked 81st▼ 68· 2025
- Electricity from wind0.32%Ranked 74th▼ 18· 2025
- Electricity from hydro3.3%Ranked 65th▼ 48· 2025
- Power-sector CO2 intensity659.5Ranked 83rd▼ 81· 2025
- Total GHG emissions incl. LULUCF1,046.8Ranked 184th▲ 3· 2023
- GHG emissions per capita11.6Ranked 168th▲ 4· 2023
Risk
Deaths in armed conflicts
- Deaths in armed conflicts1,258Ranked 35th▲ 15· 2025
- INFORM risk score5.9Ranked 47th· 2026
- Hazard & exposure8.4Ranked 71st· 2026
- Vulnerability4.4Ranked 33rd· 2026
- Lack of coping capacity5.5Ranked 46th· 2026
- Natural hazard & exposure6.7Ranked 53rd· 2026
- Human hazard & exposure9.5Ranked 72nd· 2026
- Socio-economic vulnerability2.2Ranked 23rd· 2026
- Abortion related0Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Access to electricity0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Access to electricity100Ranked 73rd· 2026
- AFF_DR_REL1.3Ranked 62nd· 2026
- Agriculture Drought Probability7.5Ranked 10th· 2026
- Agriculture Stress Index Probability7.5Ranked 10th· 2026
- Agriculture Stress Index Probability0.23Ranked 10th· 2026
- Airports and airplanes0Ranked 2nd—· 2021
- Annual number of deaths from droughts0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Annual number of people affected by droughts1.96MRanked 18th▲ 11· 2022
- Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force)2.4%Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2020
- Armed forces personnel, total650,000Ranked 10th—· 2020
- Asylum seekers per 100,0000Ranked 156th▲ 2· 2024
- A terrorist attack: Worried45.7%Ranked 53rd· 2022
- A terrorist attack: Worried45.7%Ranked 53rd· 2022
- Attacks4Ranked 37th▼ 9· 2021
- Attacks4Ranked 37th▼ 9· 2021
- Attacks4Ranked 37th▼ 9· 2021
- Average dietary supply adequacy120Ranked 27th· 2026
- Average dietary supply adequacy4Ranked 30th· 2026
- Best estimate2Ranked 30th▲ 11· 2025
- Best estimate1,189Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2025
- Best estimate0Ranked 23rd▼ 5· 2025
- Best estimate52Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2025
- bioweapons_status_current_num1Ranked 1st· 2022
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM0Ranked 1st· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.DTP30Ranked 1st· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.MCV20Ranked 1st· 2026
- CC.INF.PHY.STA1.1Ranked 12th· 2026
- chemweapons_status_current_num1Ranked 4th· 2022
- Child Mortality0.9Ranked 8th· 2026
- Child Mortality11.8Ranked 51st· 2026
- Children Under Weight1Ranked 10th· 2026
- Children Under Weight4.3Ranked 34th· 2026
- Civilian deaths446Ranked 28th▲ 8· 2025
- Civilian deaths446Ranked 28th▲ 8· 2025
- Coastal Flood108,574.2Ranked 130th· 2026
- Coastal floods (absolute)7.4Ranked 55th· 2026
- Communication1.5Ranked 13th· 2026
- Conflict GPI8.7Ranked 58th· 2026
- Conflict GPI3.2Ranked 116th· 2026
- Corruption Perception Index23Ranked 14th· 2026
- Corruption Perception Index7.7Ranked 54th· 2026
- Country where conflict took place - Conflict type: all1Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Cumulative death rate in armed conflicts4.2Ranked 45th· 2024
- Cumulative deaths in armed conflicts2,380Ranked 61st· 2024
- Current health expenditure per capita1,064.1Ranked 94th· 2026
- Cyclones1.6Ranked 9th· 2026
- Death rate from natural disasters among both sexes0.03Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2021
- Death rate in ongoing conflicts (best estimate) - Conflict type: all1.3Ranked 30th▲ 10· 2025
- Deaths from other terrorist attacks2Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2021
- Deaths in armed conflicts3,509Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2026
- Deaths in armed conflicts based on where they occurred3,509Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2026
- Demographic pressures (S1)6.8Ranked 47th▲ 6· 2023
- Development & Deprivation2Ranked 20th· 2026
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)63.62MRanked 22nd▼ 7· 2011
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)63.62MRanked 22nd▼ 7· 2011
- Drought affected10Ranked 40th· 2026
- Drought affected1.2MRanked 88th· 2026
- Drought Frequency1.9Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Drought Frequency0.06Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Droughts6.4Ranked 53rd· 2026
- earthquake (absolute)10Ranked 71st· 2026
- earthquake (relative)8.2Ranked 51st· 2026
- Earthquakes9.3Ranked 60th· 2026
- Economic inequality (E2)4.5Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2023
- Economy (E1)7.6Ranked 52nd—· 2023
- Estimated number of people living with HIV - Adult (>15) rate0.1Ranked 1st· 2026
- Estimated number of people living with HIV - Adult (>15) rate0.2Ranked 1st· 2026
- EX_CFL_REL0.12Ranked 106th· 2026
- EX_EQ_MMI6_REL0.21Ranked 120th· 2026
- EX_EQ_MMI8_REL0.07Ranked 39th· 2026
- EX_FL_REL0.51Ranked 95th· 2026
- EX_TC_SS1_REL0Ranked 9th· 2026
- EX_TC_SS3_REL0Ranked 3rd· 2026
- External intervention (X1)6.1Ranked 45th▼ 5· 2023
- EX_TS_REL867.8Ranked 41st· 2026
- Factionalized elites (C2)9.6Ranked 77th▲ 1· 2023
- Fatalities2Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2021
- Fatalties2Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2021
- FSI total score85.4Ranked 128th▲ 1· 2023
- FTS-1.REL0.27Ranked 55th· 2026
- FTS-2.REL0.3Ranked 49th· 2026
- FTS-3.REL0.58Ranked 59th· 2026
- FTS Instability0.31Ranked 62nd· 2026
- FTS Instability3.3Ranked 26th· 2026
- GDP per capita (current US$)5,190.2Ranked 77th· 2026
- Gender Inequality Index0.48Ranked 112th· 2026
- Gender Inequality Index6.4Ranked 54th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 90.41MRanked 175th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 89.81MRanked 175th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 89.17MRanked 175th· 2026
- Governance7.4Ranked 58th· 2026
- Government Effectiveness-1Ranked 31st· 2026
- Government Effectiveness7Ranked 53rd· 2026
- Group grievance (C3)9.6Ranked 78th▲ 11· 2023
- HA.FWB2.3Ranked 15th· 2026
- HA.FWB.FOOD2Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP4.5Ranked 25th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.POP.DNST5.8Ranked 30th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.URB.GROW3Ranked 30th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.URB.TOTL7.7Ranked 57th· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH0.5Ranked 6th· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH.STA.BASS1.1Ranked 12th· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH.STA.ODFC0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.HUM.CON.GCRI10Ranked 57th· 2026
- HA.NAT.CFL-ABS8.6Ranked 62nd· 2026
- HA.NAT.CFL-REL5.5Ranked 47th· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR.AFF8.4Ranked 37th· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR.AFF-FREQ5.2Ranked 25th· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR-REL4.4Ranked 30th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI6-ABS10Ranked 63rd· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI6-REL10Ranked 58th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI8-ABS10Ranked 37th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI8-REL3.3Ranked 19th· 2026
- HA.NAT.FL-REL6.4Ranked 43rd· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS1-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS3-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS-ABS2.9Ranked 11th· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT-TEMP6.7Ranked 53rd· 2026
- HA.NAT.TS-REL4.5Ranked 28th· 2026
- HA.P2P3.9Ranked 19th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP5.5Ranked 25th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.POP.DNST5.8Ranked 30th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.URB.GROW3Ranked 30th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.URB.TOTL7.7Ranked 57th· 2026
- HA.P2P.WASH0.8Ranked 9th· 2026
- HA.P2P.WASH.STA.BASS1.1Ranked 12th· 2026
- HA.VECT.AEDES7.4Ranked 38th· 2026
- HA.VECT.AEDES-REL3.5Ranked 19th· 2026
- HA.VECT.DENG6.1Ranked 33rd· 2026
- HA.VECT.DENG-REL1.2Ranked 13th· 2026
- HA.VECT.MAL4.5Ranked 3rd· 2026
- HA.VECT.MAL-REL0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV4.3Ranked 12th· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV-ABS6.9Ranked 24th· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV-REL0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Hazard6.1Ranked 43rd· 2026
- HA.ZOON9.3Ranked 72nd· 2026
- HA.ZOON.CCHF9.4Ranked 52nd· 2026
- HA.ZOON.CCHF-REL9Ranked 53rd· 2026
- HA.ZOON.LA9.1Ranked 66th· 2026
- HDI-Est0.7Ranked 77th· 2026
- Health Care3.1Ranked 29th· 2026
- Health expenditure per capita6.6Ranked 36th· 2026
- Highly Violent Internal Conflict probability0.98Ranked 173rd· 2026
- Human5.7Ranked 36th· 2026
- Human Development Index2Ranked 33rd· 2026
- Human Development Index0.8Ranked 100th· 2026
- Human flight and brain drain (E3)4.9Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2023
- Human rights (P3)9.9Ranked 82nd▼ 2· 2023
- IHR capacity score: Food safety, SPAC80Ranked 4th· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.4Ranked 5th· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.4Ranked 5th· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.4Ranked 5th· 2026
- Incidence of Tuberculosis 10Ranked 38th· 2026
- Income Gini coefficient - Inequality in income or consumption2.7Ranked 27th· 2026
- Income Gini coefficient - Inequality in income or consumption35.9Ranked 57th· 2026
- Inequality4.6Ranked 42nd· 2026
- Internally Displaced People0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Internally displaced people due to conflict0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases)124,000Ranked 96th▲ 10· 2023
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service24.76MRanked 109th· 2026
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service27.06MRanked 114th· 2026
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service51.35MRanked 118th· 2026
- Internationalized intrastate0Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2025
- Internet users (per 100 people)2Ranked 21st· 2026
- Internet users (per 100 people)79.6Ranked 93rd· 2026
- Interstate conflicts181Ranked 16th· 2024
- Intrastate1,512Ranked 51st· 2024
- IS.ROD.DNST.K29.8Ranked 40th· 2026
- Land area (sq. km)1.63MRanked 173rd· 2026
- LA_REL12.3Ranked 171st· 2026
- Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above)88.9Ranked 62nd· 2026
- Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above)2.3Ranked 21st· 2026
- Malaria incidence per 1,000 population at risk2.2Ranked 20th· 2026
- Maternal Mortality0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Maternal Mortality16Ranked 16th· 2026
- Military expenditure7.45BRanked 37th▲ 3· 2025
- Military expenditure10.17BRanked 28th▼ 4· 2023
- Military expenditure (% of government spending)11.2%Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2025
- Military expenditure per armed forces personnel10,058.8Ranked 115th▲ 1· 2020
- Military expenditure per military personnel31,931.6Ranked 82nd▼ 5· 2016
- Military personnel523,000Ranked 8th—· 2016
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)1.7Ranked 9th· 2026
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)166.3Ranked 176th· 2026
- More than 100 deaths0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Natural Disasters307.8Ranked 81st· 2026
- Natural Disasters305Ranked 79th· 2026
- Natural Disasters94Ranked 53rd· 2026
- Net ODA received (% of GNI)0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Net ODA received (% of GNI)0.05Ranked 8th· 2026
- New HIV infections (per 1000 uninfected population)0.05Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Non-fatal injuries4Ranked 34th▼ 6· 2021
- Nuclear weapons status2Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Number of live animals1.12BRanked 180th· 2026
- Number of people requiring interventions against neglected tropical diseases5,512Ranked 52nd· 2026
- Number of reported natural disasters - Earthquakes3Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2024
- Number of reported natural disasters - Tsunamis1Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2017
- Number of reported natural disasters with a small impact1Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2025
- Number of reported natural disasters with a small impact6Ranked 11th▲ 5· 2020
- ODA-1.REL3.1Ranked 11th· 2026
- ODA-2.REL2.7Ranked 7th· 2026
- ODA % GN0.01Ranked 4th· 2026
- ODA % GN0Ranked 1st· 2026
- ODA Instability0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- ODA Instability0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Official Development Assistance240.7Ranked 48th· 2026
- Official Development Assistance276Ranked 53rd· 2026
- One-sided violence2Ranked 30th▲ 11· 2025
- One-sided violence2Ranked 30th▲ 11· 2025
- One-sided violence0Ranked 32nd▲ 7· 2025
- One-sided violence0Ranked 32nd▲ 7· 2025
- One-sided violence1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- One-sided violence deaths19Ranked 11th▼ 16· 2025
- Others Vulnerable Groups1Ranked 10th· 2026
- Other terrorist attacks3Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2021
- People practicing open defecation (% of population)0.4Ranked 35th· 2026
- People using at least basic drinking water services (% of population)97.9Ranked 114th· 2026
- People using at least basic sanitation services (% of population)90.5Ranked 91st· 2026
- Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to CCHF9.8Ranked 50th· 2026
- Physical exposure to CCHF73.45MRanked 105th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VI189,195Ranked 126th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VI10Ranked 63rd· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VIII10Ranked 37th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VIII59,341.9Ranked 61st· 2026
- Physical exposure to flood465,550.7Ranked 136th· 2026
- Physical exposure to river flood8.1Ranked 61st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 14.3Ranked 12th· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 14,221.6Ranked 17th· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 30.73Ranked 4th· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 31.2Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Physical exposure to tsunamis78.5Ranked 73rd· 2026
- Physical exposure to tsunamis6.4Ranked 39th· 2026
- Physical Infrastructure3.5Ranked 33rd· 2026
- Physicians density5.5Ranked 40th· 2026
- Physicians density18.1Ranked 94th· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.AEDES-REL35.3Ranked 29th· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.DENGUE-REL11.9Ranked 38th· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.MAL.ZS0.01Ranked 2nd· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.ZIKA-REL0.76Ranked 7th· 2026
- POP.EXP.ZOON.CCHF-REL81.2Ranked 95th· 2026
- Population ages 0-5 (% of total)0.9Ranked 10th· 2026
- Population ages 0-5 (% of total)6.4Ranked 82nd· 2026
- Population at Risk to Aedes9.3Ranked 50th· 2026
- Population at Risk to Aedes31.95MRanked 132nd· 2026
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)55.8Ranked 64th· 2026
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)55.8Ranked 64th· 2026
- Population exposed to Dengue8.6Ranked 43rd· 2026
- Population exposed to Dengue10.72MRanked 106th· 2026
- Population exposed to Zika686,559.6Ranked 42nd· 2026
- Population living in urban areas (%)77Ranked 142nd· 2026
- Population living in urban areas (%)77Ranked 142nd· 2026
- Population living in urban slums5Ranked 40th· 2026
- Population living in urban slums44.7Ranked 111th· 2026
- Populations at risk of malaria7.1Ranked 8th· 2026
- Populations at risk of malaria922,188.7Ranked 12th· 2026
- Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)6.8Ranked 24th· 2026
- Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)0.6Ranked 6th· 2026
- Proportion of the target population with access to 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3)99Ranked 45th· 2026
- Proportion of the target population with access to measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2)99Ranked 64th· 2026
- Public services (P2)4.1Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Refugee change from previous year, by country of asylum42,396Ranked 32nd▼ 53· 2022
- Refugee change from previous year, by country of origin4,651Ranked 33rd▼ 57· 2022
- Refugees and asylum-seekers by country of asylum2.5MRanked 161st· 2026
- Refugees and IDPs (S2)5.5Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2023
- Refugees by country of origin per 100,000 people172.7Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2024
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of asylum770,514Ranked 11th▲ 10· 2025
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of origin157,912Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2025
- Returned refugees55Ranked 19th· 2026
- River floods7.3Ranked 52nd· 2026
- Road density (km of road per 100 sq. km of land area)9.1Ranked 53rd· 2026
- Roads, total network (km)160,000Ranked 104th· 2026
- Security apparatus (C1)7Ranked 55th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of deaths from terrorism0%Ranked 7th▼ 9· 2021
- Sovereign state1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- State involved in conflict - Conflict type: state-based1Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- State involved in conflict - Hostlev: all1Ranked 2nd—· 2014
- State involved in war - Conflict type: all0Ranked 1st—· 2011
- State legitimacy (P1)9.8Ranked 73rd▲ 4· 2023
- Terrorism deaths per 100,000 people0Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2021
- Total deaths from natural disasters among both sexes26.2Ranked 56th▼ 10· 2021
- Total number of deaths caused by a disaster and secondary effects - Earthquakes4Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Total number of deaths caused by a disaster and secondary effects - Tsunamis5Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2017
- Tsunamis5.5Ranked 33rd· 2026
- Tuberculosis prevalence0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Unknown0Ranked 15th▼ 7· 2021
- Unknown0Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2021
- Unknown0Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2021
- Unknown0Ranked 15th▼ 7· 2021
- Uprooted people8.6Ranked 65th· 2026
- Urban population growth (annual %)1.5Ranked 100th· 2026
- Urban population growth (annual %)1.5Ranked 100th· 2026
- Vulnerability0.43Ranked 82nd▲ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: adaptive capacity0.55Ranked 103rd—· 2024
- Vulnerability: ecosystem services0.53Ranked 129th▼ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: exposure0.48Ranked 72nd—· 2024
- Vulnerability: food0.45Ranked 90th▼ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: health0.44Ranked 103rd—· 2024
- Vulnerability: human habitat0.47Ranked 68th—· 2024
- Vulnerability: infrastructure0.12Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: sensitivity0.31Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2024
- Vulnerability: water0.57Ranked 124th—· 2024
- Vulnerable groups6.1Ranked 55th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Development0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP1.2Ranked 52nd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP.GEO1.9Ranked 18th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP.NORM0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Humanitarian0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-GNI0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-GNI.GEO0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP5.8Ranked 9th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP.GEO0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP.NORM0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-TOT0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.REM0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.REM.GEO0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Remittences0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.SEV.PD.HDI2Ranked 20th· 2026
- VU.SEV.PD.HDI-EST3.8Ranked 35th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.FS2.3Ranked 23rd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.HIV0.2Ranked 2nd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.HIV.INCD0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.MAL0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.TRP0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE.TRP-REL0.01Ranked 45th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-POP0.4Ranked 5th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-REL0.4Ranked 5th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-TOT323,426.5Ranked 100th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.U51Ranked 9th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-ABS10Ranked 61st· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-POP2.8Ranked 127th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-REL7.2Ranked 52nd· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-TOT2.5MRanked 151st· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.REF-TOT2.5MRanked 161st· 2026
- War took place0Ranked 2nd—· 2010
- Lack of institutional coping capacity7.4Ranked 53rd· 2026
- Lack of infrastructure coping capacity2.7Ranked 24th· 2026
- Battle-related deaths (state-based)1,249Ranked 28th▲ 14· 2025
- Organized-violence deaths (total)1,268Ranked 38th▲ 15· 2025
Society
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2050Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2050UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2050
Gini index
- Gini index35.9Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Extreme poverty2.5%Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2023
- Internet users85.3%Ranked 76th▼ 3· 2024
- Homicide rate2.4Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2014
- Female labor participation14%Ranked 178th—· 2025
- Fixed broadband subscriptions12.1Ranked 92nd▼ 1· 2024
- Life satisfaction5.2Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2025
- Human Development Index0.8Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Gender Inequality Index0.48Ranked 111th▲ 10· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.88Ranked 94th▼ 5· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted HDI0.64Ranked 62nd▼ 1· 2023
- Planetary pressures-adjusted HDI0.73Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2023
- 5.5.2 - Proportion of women in senior and middle management positions - 13th ICLS (%) - IC_GEN_MGTN19.9%Ranked 73rd▼ 9· 2023
- Accepting a bribe: Never justifiable77.5%Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2022
- Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)25.8%Ranked 4th▼ 18· 2020
- Adolescent birth rate26.2Ranked 110th—· 2023
- All ages2.4Ranked 36th▲ 8· 2017
- Altruism (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.59Ranked 4th· 2012
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, bottom 40% of population (%)1.7Ranked 21st· 2023
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, total population (%)0.9Ranked 23rd· 2023
- Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter)32.3Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2023
- Asylum-seekers (by country of asylum)34Ranked 141st▲ 1· 2022
- Asylum-seekers by country of origin49,263Ranked 34th▲ 4· 2025
- Asylum-seekers by country of origin61,176Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2024
- Asylum-seekers by country of residence0Ranked 151st▲ 1· 2024
- Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum0Ranked 156th▲ 3· 2025
- Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin49,263Ranked 34th▲ 4· 2025
- Augmented Human Development Index (AHDI)0.37Ranked 92nd▼ 4· 2020
- Augmented Human Development Index (AHDI)0.37Ranked 92nd▼ 4· 2020
- A woman can choose where to live in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- A woman can open a bank account in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- A woman can sign a contract in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Basic welfare Index (IDEA)63.6Ranked 73rd—· 2021
- Battle-related deaths (number of people)123Ranked 13th▲ 6· 2024
- Below $3 a day2.5%Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2023
- Cereal yield (kg per hectare)2,420.4Ranked 107th▼ 2· 2023
- Children (13-15) who reported being bullied27.5%Ranked 80th· 2015
- co2_prod9.2Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- coef_ineq19.1Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2023
- Completeness of homelessness data4Ranked 8th· 2022
- Countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Current number of seats in national parliaments (number)285Ranked 38th▼ 1· 2026
- Daily male smokers6.65MRanked 19th—· 2012
- Daily time spent on domestic work, women (UN (2017))5.8Ranked 9th· 2008
- Death rate from interpersonal violence among both sexes2.9Ranked 62nd▼ 4· 2021
- Deaths from homicide in both sexes in all ages1,955Ranked 74th▲ 1· 2017
- diff_hdi_phdi9.3Ranked 63rd—· 2023
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)63.6Ranked 23rd▼ 9· 2011
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters relative to GDP (%)0Ranked 55th▼ 4· 2011
- Direct economic loss in the housing sector attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)63.62MRanked 19th▼ 6· 2011
- Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical infrastructure attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)0Ranked 34th▲ 5· 2011
- Direct economic loss to cultural heritage damaged or destroyed attributed to disasters (millions of current United States dollars)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2011
- Direct economic loss to other damaged or destroyed productive assets attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)0Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2011
- Equal access to financial services for women and men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Equality of civil liberties across social groups-0.88Ranked 149th▼ 10· 2025
- Equality of political power across social groups-0.53Ranked 141st▲ 4· 2025
- Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education (%)63Ranked 35th· 2022
- eys_f14.1Ranked 96th▲ 1· 2023
- eys_m13.9Ranked 84th▲ 2· 2023
- Females0.09Ranked 149th▲ 4· 2023
- Forcibly displaced people1.65MRanked 150th▼ 13· 2025
- gdi_group5Ranked 1st· 2023
- GDI Group5Ranked 1st· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.88Ranked 94th▼ 5· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.88Ranked 94th▼ 5· 2023
- Gender-equal inheritance for women (How Was Life (2014))0Ranked 2nd—· 2000
- Gender Inequality Index0.48Ranked 111th▲ 10· 2023
- gii_rank123Ranked 43rd· 2023
- Gini according to the World Inequality Database0.51Ranked 37th▼ 5· 2022
- Gini coefficient0.36Ranked 34th▼ 6· 2023
- Gini coefficient of lifespan inequality - Sex: female0.09Ranked 68th▼ 4· 2023
- Gini coefficient of lifespan inequality - Sex: male0.11Ranked 65th▼ 9· 2023
- Gini Index around 201538.8Ranked 45th· 2015
- gni_pc_f4,432.6Ranked 132nd▲ 1· 2023
- gni_pc_m27,375.5Ranked 71st▼ 1· 2023
- Growth rates of household expenditure or income per capita (%)0.9Ranked 23rd· 2023
- Happiness: Happy69.6%Ranked 88th▲ 34· 2022
- HCI in males0.58Ranked 67th▲ 1· 2020
- hdi_f0.72Ranked 99th▼ 2· 2023
- hdi_m0.83Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2023
- hdi_rank75Ranked 100th· 2023
- Homicides1,936Ranked 89th▼ 5· 2014
- Homicides of female victims224.2Ranked 65th▼ 3· 2014
- Homicides of female victims224.2Ranked 65th▼ 3· 2014
- Homicides of male victims1,711.8Ranked 78th▲ 3· 2014
- Homicides where the weapon was a firearm302Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2015
- Homosexuality: Not justifiable91.7%Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2022
- Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1)0.59Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2020
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, female (scale -30–87)-14.9Ranked 169th▲ 4· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, male (scale -30–87)41.7Ranked 113th▼ 5· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, total (scale -30–87)13.7Ranked 163rd▼ 1· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, female (scale 0–325)154.1Ranked 98th▼ 1· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, male (scale 0–325)206.3Ranked 65th▼ 6· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, total (scale 0–325)180.5Ranked 87th▼ 2· 2025
- Human Development Index0.8Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Human Development Index0.8Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Human Development Index0.8Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Human Development Index0.8Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Human Development Index (male)0.83Ranked 63rd▼ 1· 2023
- [ILO] Proportion of population covered by at least one social protection benefit, by sex (%)100Ranked 1st▼ 71· 2023
- [ILO] Proportion of population with severe disabilities receiving disability cash benefit, by sex (%)8.7Ranked 9th▼ 49· 2023
- [ILO] Proportion of vulnerable population receiving social assistance cash benefit, by sex (%)100Ranked 97th· 2019
- Income share held by fourth 20%22Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Income share held by highest 10%28.2Ranked 21st▼ 7· 2023
- Income share held by highest 20%43.3Ranked 20th▼ 10· 2023
- Income share held by lowest 10%2.8Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Income share held by lowest 20%7Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2023
- Income share held by second 20%11.7Ranked 23rd▲ 2· 2023
- Income share held by third 20%16Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2023
- ineq_edu21.9Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- ineq_inc27.5Ranked 75th—· 2023
- ineq_le7.9Ranked 118th▲ 3· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted HDI0.64Ranked 84th▲ 3· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index0.64Ranked 84th▲ 3· 2023
- Intentional homicides, female (per 100,000 female)0.56Ranked 20th▼ 7· 2014
- Intentional homicides, male (per 100,000 male)4.1Ranked 54th—· 2014
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases)124,000Ranked 97th▲ 11· 2023
- Justice system (courts)76.4%Ranked 14th▼ 32· 2022
- Justifiable, terrorism: average score1.6Ranked 37th· 2022
- Latest data (2021 prices)2.5%Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2023
- Latest data (2021 prices)2.26MRanked 7th▼ 8· 2023
- Laws on child marriage0.75Ranked 2nd· 2019
- le_f79.6Ranked 71st▼ 5· 2023
- Legal equality index6.8Ranked 157th· 2026
- le_m75.8Ranked 47th▼ 6· 2023
- lfpr_f13.6Ranked 183rd▲ 3· 2023
- lfpr_m67.5Ranked 113th▼ 2· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 59th—· 2023
- loss19.5Ranked 78th▲ 2· 2023
- Married women are not required by law to obey their husbands0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Maternal mortality ratio22Ranked 68th—· 2023
- Mean daily welfare12.7Ranked 139th—· 2026
- Median daily welfare10.1Ranked 136th—· 2026
- mf5.9Ranked 101st▼ 2· 2023
- Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population)2.5Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2023
- mys_f10.9Ranked 75th—· 2023
- mys_m10.8Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Negative reciprocity (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.12Ranked 24th· 2012
- Neighborhood78.6%Ranked 30th· 2022
- Neighbors being homosexuals: Mentioned92.4%Ranked 2nd—· 2010
- Neighbors of a different religion: Mentioned33.8%Ranked 9th▲ 6· 2022
- Net personal wealth share, bottom 50%0.04Ranked 54th▲ 4· 2024
- Net personal wealth share, top 1%0.26Ranked 120th▲ 1· 2024
- Net personal wealth share, top 10%0.6Ranked 114th▲ 1· 2024
- Not in extreme poverty88.57MRanked 51st▼ 10· 2023
- Number of damaged critical infrastructure attributed to disasters (number)6Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2010
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters (number)6Ranked 6th▼ 38· 2011
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)0.01Ranked 2nd▼ 22· 2011
- Number of deaths due to disaster (number)6Ranked 6th▼ 37· 2011
- Number of destroyed or damaged educational facilities attributed to disasters (number)6Ranked 21st▲ 4· 2010
- Number of directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)0.04Ranked 88th▲ 1· 2011
- Number of disruptions to basic services attributed to disasters (number)2Ranked 25th▼ 6· 2010
- Number of disruptions to educational services attributed to disasters (number)1Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2010
- Number of disruptions to health services attributed to disasters (number)1Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2010
- Number of injured or ill people attributed to disasters (number)35Ranked 56th▲ 26· 2011
- Number of missing persons due to disaster (number)3Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2010
- Number of people affected by disaster (number)35Ranked 77th▲ 11· 2011
- Number of people below $1.90 a day (2011 prices)295,984Ranked 15th▼ 7· 2022
- Number of people whose damaged dwellings were attributed to disasters (number)33,400Ranked 17th▼ 8· 2011
- Number of people whose destroyed dwellings were attributed to disasters (number)132Ranked 40th▼ 17· 2011
- Number of refugees per 100,000 population, by country of origin (per 100,000 population)172.7Ranked 46th—· 2025
- Number of surveys in the past decade8Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2025
- Official development assistance grants for poverty reduction, by recipient countries (percentage of GNI)0Ranked 8th▲ 5· 2024
- Official development assistance grants for poverty reduction, by recipient countries (percentage of GNI)0%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Other people in need of international protection879,500Ranked 3rd· 2025
- Other people in need of international protection by country or territory of asylum879,500Ranked 3rd· 2025
- Others of concern to UNHCR3,676Ranked 24th· 2021
- Overall loss19.5%Ranked 78th▲ 2· 2023
- Patience (time preference) (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)-0.38Ranked 68th· 2012
- Percentage point change in share of people who are religious (2010-2020)-0%Ranked 77th· 2020
- Political and Social Integration Index2.7Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2025
- pop_total90.6Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Positive reciprocity (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.55Ranked 4th· 2012
- Post-tax national income share, bottom 50%0.18Ranked 70th▼ 1· 2024
- Post-tax national income share, top 1%0.16Ranked 71st▲ 3· 2024
- Post-tax national income share, top 10%0.45Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2024
- Poverty gap at $2.15/day0Ranked 79th▲ 5· 2026
- Poverty gap at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (%)0.5Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Poverty gap at $3.65/day0.01Ranked 119th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $4.20 a day (2021 PPP) (%)1.7Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2023
- Poverty gap at $6.85/day0.07Ranked 132nd▲ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (%)11.3Ranked 30th▼ 6· 2023
- Poverty gap index ($3 a day)0.49%Ranked 33rd▼ 7· 2023
- Poverty headcount ratio at $2.15/day0.01Ranked 61st▲ 8· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $3.65/day0.05Ranked 101st—· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $4.20 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)7.5Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- Poverty headcount ratio at $6.85/day0.26Ranked 123rd▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)36Ranked 38th▼ 9· 2023
- Poverty headcount ratio at societal poverty line (% of population)21.8Ranked 32nd▼ 11· 2023
- Poverty severity at $2.15/day0Ranked 70th▲ 5· 2026
- Poverty severity at $3.65/day0Ranked 110th▲ 2· 2026
- Poverty severity at $6.85/day0.03Ranked 131st▲ 1· 2026
- Pre-tax national income share, bottom 50%0.17Ranked 57th—· 2024
- Pre-tax national income share, top 1%0.17Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2024
- Pre-tax national income share, top 10%0.47Ranked 69th—· 2024
- pr_f5.6Ranked 172nd▼ 4· 2023
- Prison capacity percent153%Ranked 1st· 2020
- pr_m94.4Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls subjected to physical and/or sexual violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by age (%) - 15 to 49 years old17.6%Ranked 34th· 2018
- Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls subjected to physical and/or sexual violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by age (%) - 15 years old and over15.2%Ranked 34th· 2018
- Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone, by sex (%)86.8Ranked 59th▼ 6· 2024
- Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income (%)12.6Ranked 25th▼ 6· 2023
- Proportion of population below international poverty line (%)2.5Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of population using basic drinking water services, by location (%)97.9Ranked 56th▼ 4· 2024
- Proportion of population using basic sanitation services, by location (%)90.5Ranked 96th▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services (%)57Ranked 32nd▼ 11· 2009
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, education (%)13.2Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2009
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, education [UIS methodology] (%)18.8Ranked 23rd▲ 14· 2022
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, health (%)6.4Ranked 74th▲ 1· 2009
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, social protection (%)37.3Ranked 16th▼ 13· 2009
- Proportion of women aged 20-24 years who were married or in a union before age 15 (%)2.7%Ranked 4th· 2010
- Prosperity gap3.3Ranked 14th▼ 8· 2023
- Prosperity gap (average shortfall from a prosperity standard of $28/day)3.3Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2023
- rankdiff_hdi_phdi14Ranked 23rd· 2023
- Returned refugees60Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Risk taking (Falk et al. (2018) GPS)0.34Ranked 67th· 2012
- (S.1.C.1) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 1: Maternity Care (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.1.C.2) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 2: Life Saving Commodities (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.1.C.3) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 3: Abortion19Ranked 6th· 2022
- (S.1.C.4) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 4: Post-Abortion Care (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.1) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 1: Maternity Care (%)80Ranked 10th· 2022
- (S.2.C.5) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 5: Contraceptive Services (%)80Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.2.C.6) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 6: Contraceptive Consent (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.2.C.7) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 7: Emergency Contraception (%)75Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.2) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 2: Contraceptive and Family Planning (%)85Ranked 5th· 2022
- (S.3.C.8) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 8: Sexuality Education Curriculum Laws (%)0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.3.C.9) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 9: Sexuality Education Curriculum Topics (%)0Ranked 6th· 2022
- (S.3) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 3: Sexuality Education (%)0Ranked 7th· 2022
- (S.4.C.10) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 10: HIV Counselling and Test Services80Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4.C.11) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 11: HIV Treatment and Care Services (%)80Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4.C.12) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 12: HIV Confidentiality (%)80Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4.C.13) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 13: HPV Vaccine (%)0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 4: HIV and HPV (%)60Ranked 9th· 2022
- se_f59.1Ranked 110th▲ 2· 2023
- Self-reported life satisfaction5.2Ranked 94th▼ 2· 2025
- Self-reported life satisfaction (up to 29 years)5.3Ranked 92nd· 2023
- Self-reported life satisfaction (up to 29 years)5.3Ranked 92nd· 2023
- se_m69.5Ranked 93rd▲ 3· 2023
- Share according to the World Inequality Database14.7%Ranked 40th▼ 9· 2022
- Share agreeing "most people can be trusted"14.8%Ranked 60th▼ 9· 2022
- Share in extreme monetary poverty2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share in extreme poverty2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share in extreme poverty2.5%Ranked 38th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of children who are underweight4.3%Ranked 21st▼ 9· 2017
- Share of people who attend religious services frequently43.2%Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2022
- Share of people who pray frequently80.9%Ranked 18th· 2022
- Share of prisoners that are foreigners2.9%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Share of prisoners that are pre-trial detainees25.1%Ranked 53rd▲ 47· 2020
- Share of total deaths from homicide in both sexes in all ages0.56%Ranked 67th▼ 5· 2017
- Share of women aged 15-19 years old who are married or in a union18.8%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2022
- Share of women aged 15-49 years old who are married or in a union60.1%Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2050
- Share (top 10%, wealth)60.1%Ranked 114th▲ 1· 2024
- Share (top 1%, wealth)25.6%Ranked 120th▲ 1· 2024
- Share who say religion is "very important"70.5%Ranked 18th▲ 6· 2022
- Stateless persons34Ranked 77th▼ 2· 2022
- Survey mean consumption or income per capita, bottom 40% of population (2021 PPP $ per day)6Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2023
- Survey mean consumption or income per capita, total population (2021 PPP $ per day)12.8Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2023
- There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence (1=yes; 0=no)0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Total assistance for development, by recipient countries (millions of current United States dollars)706.9Ranked 79th▼ 55· 2024
- Total deaths and disappearances recorded during migration (number)1,387Ranked 42nd▼ 6· 2025
- Total deaths from interpersonal violence among both sexes2,513.1Ranked 161st▲ 1· 2021
- Total expenditure per capita spent on cultural and natural heritage, public (PPP, constant 2017 United States dollars)0Ranked 48th· 2022
- Total shortfall ($3 a day)488.11MRanked 11th▼ 5· 2023
- Trust: Confidence in the churches78.1%Ranked 16th▼ 5· 2022
- Trust: Confidence in the United Nations44.9%Ranked 44th▼ 10· 2022
- Trust in others14.8%Ranked 60th▼ 9· 2022
- Trust journalists in this country55.1%Ranked 51st· 2020
- Trust people in neighborhood82.2%Ranked 25th· 2020
- Trust people of another religion64.2%Ranked 13th· 2022
- Trust science84.2%Ranked 35th· 2020
- Trust the national government in this country45.8%Ranked 65th· 2020
- Universities81.9%Ranked 9th· 2022
- Very important93.9%Ranked 24th▲ 7· 2022
- Very important40.4%Ranked 51st▲ 10· 2022
- Very important22.6%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2022
- Very important70.5%Ranked 18th▲ 6· 2022
- Very important75.5%Ranked 11th· 2022
- Very important29.8%Ranked 83rd▲ 13· 2022
- Very important77.5%Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2022
- Watts index at $2.15/day0Ranked 113th▼ 8· 2026
- Watts index at $3.65/day0.01Ranked 97th▼ 4· 2026
- Watts index at $6.85/day0.1Ranked 84th▼ 4· 2026
- WBL: Enforcement Perceptions Index (scale 0-100)24.8Ranked 168th· 2025
- WBL: Legal Framework Index (scale 0-100)26.3Ranked 169th· 2025
- WBL: Supportive Framework Index (scale 0-100)22.5Ranked 157th· 2025
- WEO Index overall score (Economist Intelligence Unit (2012))35.4Ranked 117th· 2012
- Woman chief executive (31st December)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Woman head of government (31st December)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Woman head of state (31st December)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Women, Business and the Law Index31.25Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2023
- Women can apply for a passport in the same way as men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Women can get a divorce on the same terms as men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Women can get a job in the same way as men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Women can register a business on the same terms as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women who were first married by age 18 (% of women ages 20-24)16.7%Ranked 11th· 2010
- [World Bank] Proportion of population covered by social assistance programs (%)90Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Years a country was an European overseas colony0Ranked 93rd—· 2022
- Youth NEET rate26.2%Ranked 141st▲ 1· 2027
- Poverty headcount at $2.15/day0.01Ranked 61st▲ 8· 2026
- Poverty headcount at $3.65/day0.05Ranked 101st—· 2026
- Poverty headcount at $6.85/day0.26Ranked 123rd▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $2.15/day0Ranked 79th▲ 5· 2026
- Refugees hosted (by country of asylum)770,514Ranked 11th▲ 10· 2025
- Refugees originating (by country of origin)157,912Ranked 157th▼ 2· 2025
- Asylum seekers49,263Ranked 148th▼ 12· 2025
< 1 ha
- < 1 ha2.06MRanked 1st· 2003
- < 1 ha407,070Ranked 3rd· 2003
- 2.5.1 - Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution - ER_GRF_ANIMRCNTN_TRB8Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2025
- 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures - Value ()0.07Ranked 77th▲ 1· 2021
- Agricultural irrigated land (% of total agricultural land)16.9%Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Agricultural irrigated land (% of total agricultural land)16.9Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Agricultural land47,067Ranked 18th—· 2024
- Agricultural land (% of land area)29Ranked 129th▲ 1· 2023
- Agricultural land (% of land area)29%Ranked 129th▲ 1· 2023
- Agricultural land (sq. km)470,670Ranked 18th—· 2023
- Agricultural land use47.07MRanked 18th—· 2023
- Agricultural land use47.07MRanked 18th—· 2023
- Agricultural land use per capita0.52Ranked 80th▲ 1· 2023
- Agriculture13.6%Ranked 96th—· 2025
- Agriculture185.1Ranked 107th▼ 2· 2023
- Agriculture16.77MRanked 28th▲ 2· 2023
- Agriculture12.7%Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2025
- Agriculture185.1Ranked 107th▼ 2· 2023
- Agriculture area under organic agric. - Area (hectares)15,412.5Ranked 91st▼ 12· 2023
- Agriculture as a share of GDP10.6%Ranked 54th▼ 10· 2025
- agriculture_ha45.92MRanked 17th▲ 1· 2010
- Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures0.07Ranked 81st▲ 4· 2021
- Agriculture share of Government Expenditure (%)0.93Ranked 111th—· 2021
- Agriculture value added share of GDP (%)12.4Ranked 54th▼ 5· 2021
- All fertilizers use1.07MRanked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- all_sizes_number4.33MRanked 1st· 2003
- Animal protein99.3Ranked 133rd▼ 5· 2023
- Animal protein24.8Ranked 133rd▼ 5· 2023
- Antibiotic use in livestock145.4Ranked 12th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (mg per population corrected units)145.4Ranked 16th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (mg per population corrected units)145.4Ranked 16th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (tonnes)2,332.8Ranked 7th· 2020
- Apple production2.35MRanked 7th—· 2024
- Aquaculture709,391Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Aquaculture production709,391Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Aquaculture production (metric tons)709,391Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Arable land15,699Ranked 22nd—· 2024
- Arable land (hectares)15.7MRanked 21st—· 2023
- Arable land (hectares per person)0.17Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2023
- Arable land (hectares per person)0.17Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2023
- Arable land needed to produce a fixed quantity of crops0.15Ranked 133rd▲ 2· 2023
- Arable land (% of land area)9.7Ranked 105th▲ 1· 2023
- Arable land (% of land area)9.7%Ranked 105th▲ 1· 2023
- Area of permanent meadows and pastures29.48MRanked 26th—· 2023
- Average dietary energy supply adequacy120%Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2025
- Average farm size4.1Ranked 44th▲ 3· 2000
- Average precipitation in depth (mm per year)228Ranked 154th▼ 2· 2022
- Banana production135,294.1Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2024
- Banana production135,294.1Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2024
- Banana yields31.9Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2024
- Barley production4MRanked 11th▼ 1· 2024
- Barley yield2.3Ranked 66th▲ 1· 2024
- Bean production160,808.8Ranked 30th▼ 5· 2024
- Bean yields1.9Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2024
- Beef and buffalo meat production238,796.2Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2024
- Business-as-usual-4,219.1Ranked 138th· 2050
- Cages (battery or enriched)100%Ranked 1st· 2018
- Calories from animal protein99.3Ranked 133rd▼ 5· 2023
- Cattle meat yield per animal170Ranked 89th▲ 24· 2024
- Cephalopods - Production (tonnes)4,000Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2023
- Cereal production24.51MRanked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Cereal production (metric tons)20.96MRanked 26th▼ 1· 2023
- Cereals576.4Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2017
- Cereals allocated to human food67.5%Ranked 55th▼ 39· 2023
- Cereals - excluding beer used for direct human food17.21MRanked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Cereals, primary production24.51MRanked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Cereal yield (kg per hectare)2,420.4Ranked 107th▼ 2· 2023
- Cereal yields2.7Ranked 96th▼ 4· 2024
- Cereal yields2.7Ranked 96th▼ 4· 2024
- Cereal yields2.7Ranked 96th▼ 4· 2024
- Change in agriculture area with respect to one decade back2.4%Ranked 48th▼ 10· 2023
- Change to land area used for cereal production since 1961187Ranked 43rd—· 2014
- Chicken meat production2.27MRanked 14th—· 2024
- Chicken meat yield per animal1.2Ranked 98th▼ 15· 2024
- Coefficient of Variation (CV) of caloric intake0.27Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2020
- Corn attainable yield10Ranked 10th· 2012
- Corn yield gap3.4Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2024
- Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Country area174,515Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Cropland17,590Ranked 22nd—· 2024
- Cropland0.25Ranked 47th▼ 11· 2010
- Cropland area17.59MRanked 21st—· 2023
- Cropland area17.59MRanked 21st—· 2023
- Cropland area17.59MRanked 21st—· 2023
- Crop production index (2014-2016 = 100)77.4Ranked 182nd▲ 3· 2022
- Daily food supply260.51BRanked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of all meat81.9Ranked 127th▼ 4· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of calories from miscellaneous group0.5Ranked 156th▼ 7· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of calories from vegetal products2,572.7Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of cereals - excluding beer520.4Ranked 41st▲ 8· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from animal products24.8Ranked 133rd▼ 5· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from fish and seafood3.2Ranked 108th▼ 3· 2023
- Daily per capita supply of proteins from vegetal products54.8Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2023
- Dairy (milk equivalents)147.3Ranked 94th▼ 4· 2017
- Dietary energy supply (kcal/capita/day)2,875.2Ranked 106th▼ 1· 2023
- Egg production788,610.8Ranked 21st—· 2024
- Egg production per bird14.9Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2024
- Estimated number of farmed fish630MRanked 13th—· 2022
- Excess nitrogen per hectare of cropland51.2Ranked 68th· 2009
- Excess phosphorous per hectare of cropland8.1Ranked 75th· 2009
- Fat supply (g/capita/day)83.3Ranked 109th▼ 4· 2023
- Female employment in agriculture12.7%Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2025
- Fertilizer consumption (FAO (2017) & Federico (2008))31.6Ranked 118th▲ 2· 2014
- Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)68.3Ranked 106th▲ 6· 2023
- Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)68.3Ranked 106th▲ 6· 2023
- Fertilizer consumption (% of fertilizer production)58.7Ranked 46th▼ 3· 2023
- Fertilizer use per hectare of cropland60.9Ranked 97th▲ 3· 2023
- Fish and seafood consumption per capita (kg)11.6Ranked 98th▲ 7· 2018
- Fish and seafood - Production (tonnes)1.26MRanked 21st—· 2023
- Food aid received35,862Ranked 87th▲ 9· 2009
- Food as share of total consumer expenditure27.9%Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2023
- Food expenditure448.5Ranked 98th—· 2023
- Food expenditure27.9%Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2023
- Food exports (% of merchandise exports)5.9%Ranked 126th▲ 2· 2022
- Food - Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) (thousand US Dollar)52.74BRanked 13th▼ 1· 2024
- Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)83.9Ranked 182nd▲ 11· 2022
- Forest area (sq. km)107,883.9Ranked 52nd—· 2023
- Forest land10,751Ranked 50th—· 2025
- Fruit, primary production16.99MRanked 9th▼ 1· 2024
- Game meat production2,811.2Ranked 41st—· 2024
- Global Hunger Index7.7Ranked 67th▼ 11· 2021
- Grape production1.57MRanked 15th▲ 1· 2024
- Gross production value of the agricultural sector30.63BRanked 22nd▼ 4· 2024
- Groundnut yields4.9Ranked 4th—· 2024
- HALF Index (habitable land area)41.6%Ranked 98th· 2011
- HALF Index (habitable land area) (Alexander et al. (2016))41.6%Ranked 98th· 2011
- Hypothetical global meat demand if everyone ate like the average citizen of a given country241.92MRanked 128th▼ 3· 2023
- Hypothetical number of land animals that would be slaughtered if all countries produced meat in the same way as a given country169.38BRanked 27th▲ 1· 2024
- Imports of cereals - excluding beer8.96MRanked 22nd▲ 9· 2023
- In cages66.08MRanked 7th· 2018
- Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Consumer Food Price Index-1Ranked 115th▼ 5· 2024
- Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Consumer Food Price Index-0.24Ranked 119th▲ 73· 2023
- Insecticide use2,600Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Intensity of agricultural-environmental policies4.3Ranked 67th· 2022
- Land area162,250Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Land area (sq. km)1.62MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.78Ranked 135th—· 2015
- Land under cereal production (hectares)8.66MRanked 22nd—· 2023
- Land use: Agriculture47.2MRanked 18th—· 2025
- Land use: Cropland17.73MRanked 22nd▲ 1· 2025
- Land used for cereal production9MRanked 20th—· 2024
- Land used for rye production491Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Land use: Grazingland29.48MRanked 26th—· 2025
- Land use (per capita): Agriculture0.55Ranked 69th—· 2025
- Land use (per capita): Cropland0.21Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2025
- Lettuce yields29.9Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Life expectancy at birth77.7Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Livestock production index (2014-2016 = 100)99.9Ranked 138th▲ 17· 2022
- Machinery per unit of agricultural land0.37Ranked 87th▲ 3· 2019
- Maize production269,804.6Ranked 87th▼ 1· 2024
- Maize yield6.7Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2024
- Male employment in agriculture13.8%Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2025
- Meat, total production2.8MRanked 27th▼ 1· 2024
- Mid-point estimate3.2BRanked 12th▲ 2· 2022
- Milk production8.51MRanked 23rd▲ 1· 2024
- Milk production per animal401.7Ranked 129th—· 2024
- Milk, total production8.51MRanked 23rd▲ 1· 2024
- Millet yields1.7Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2024
- Net trade of food products as a share of domestic supply-13.3%Ranked 85th▼ 23· 2023
- nitrogen_applied_per_ha74.7Ranked 73rd· 2009
- Nitrogen fertilizer use903,185Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Nitrogen fertilizer use903,185Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Nitrogen use efficiency56%Ranked 81st▲ 6· 2014
- Number of cattle5.6MRanked 48th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of cattle slaughtered for meat3,799.9Ranked 41st▼ 8· 2024
- Number of cattle slaughtered for meat1.39MRanked 41st▼ 8· 2024
- Number of chickens slaughtered to produce meat1.88BRanked 9th▲ 1· 2024
- Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution30Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution30Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Number of local breeds kept in the country69Ranked 23rd—· 2025
- Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number)68Ranked 22nd—· 2025
- Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number)7Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Number of moderately or severely food insecure people35.2MRanked 9th—· 2023
- Number of people employed in agriculture3.69MRanked 36th▼ 1· 2025
- Number of people undernourished (3-year avg)6.2Ranked 31st—· 2025
- Number of people who are undernourished6.2MRanked 21st—· 2023
- Number of people who cannot afford sufficient calories1.5MRanked 50th· 2021
- Number of pigs0Ranked 161st▲ 21· 1992
- Number of policies26Ranked 49th· 2022
- Number of poultry birds1.04BRanked 6th—· 2024
- Number of severely food insecure people5.3MRanked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Number of severely food insecure people (3-year avg)4.4Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution8Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)33Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) (number)33Ranked 48th—· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number)12Ranked 13th—· 2025
- Number of undernourished people (millions)6.2Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)51.4Ranked 81st▲ 6· 2023
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)51.4Ranked 81st▲ 6· 2023
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)51.4Ranked 81st▲ 6· 2023
- Nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)6.3Ranked 122nd▲ 6· 2023
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)3.4Ranked 122nd▼ 2· 2023
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) - Use per capita (Kilograms per capita)0.65Ranked 96th▼ 5· 2023
- Orange production2.23MRanked 9th▼ 1· 2024
- Orange yields39.2Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2024
- Other16.6Ranked 162nd▼ 14· 2023
- Pea production0Ranked 96th▲ 2· 2014
- Percentage of children under five years of age who are stunted (Percent)4.8%Ranked 103rd▼ 2· 2024
- Permanent cropland (% of land area)1.2Ranked 112th—· 2023
- Phosphorous inputs per hectare of cropland15.2Ranked 73rd· 2009
- Pig meat production0Ranked 167th▼ 1· 2006
- Pig meat yield per animal63Ranked 24th▲ 15· 1979
- Population in moderate or severe food insecurity (thousands of people)35,168.9Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Population in severe food insecurity (thousands of people)5,318.5Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Potash fertilizer production0Ranked 25th▼ 4· 2023
- Potatoes yield32.3Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2024
- Potato production2.92MRanked 25th▼ 3· 2024
- Poultry meat production2.28MRanked 14th—· 2024
- Poultry meat yield per animal1.2Ranked 103rd▼ 14· 2024
- Prevalence of anaemia among women of reproductive age25.5%Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (3-year avg)37.7%Ranked 78th—· 2025
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)38.8Ranked 41st▼ 3· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)38.8Ranked 41st▼ 3· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the total population38.8%Ranked 41st▼ 3· 2023
- Prevalence of obesity in the adult population24.6%Ranked 85th▼ 3· 2024
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%)5.9Ranked 51st▼ 4· 2023
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%)5.9Ranked 51st▼ 4· 2023
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the total population5.9%Ranked 51st▼ 4· 2023
- Prevalence of stunting in children under 52.7%Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2024
- Prevalence of undernourishment (%)6.8Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Prevalence of undernourishment (3-year avg)6.7%Ranked 27th—· 2025
- Production of sesame oil9,347.7Ranked 18th▲ 7· 2023
- Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture3Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)20%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2025
- Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)20Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2025
- Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)14Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2025
- Protein supply (g/capita/day)79.6Ranked 117th▲ 4· 2023
- [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture, current status score2.8Ranked 23rd—· 2024
- [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture, trend score3Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2024
- Rapeseed production280,000Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Rapeseed yields1.9Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2024
- Retail9.7Ranked 99th▲ 16· 2022
- Rice production3.48MRanked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Rice production3.48MRanked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- Rice yields4.5Ranked 44th▼ 6· 2024
- Rodenticide use5Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2023
- Roots and tubers, total production2.92MRanked 52nd▼ 2· 2024
- Rural land area (sq. km)1.6MRanked 17th—· 2015
- Rural land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.76Ranked 130th—· 2015
- Rural land area where elevation is below 5 meters (sq. km)12,358.5Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2015
- Rye production445.5Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- Rye yield0.91Ranked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Seed cotton yields2.4Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2024
- Sesame seed production29,000Ranked 26th—· 2024
- share_farms_under2ha_area6Ranked 6th· 2003
- Share of arable land that is organic0.03%Ranked 119th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of cereals allocated to human food67.5%Ranked 55th▼ 39· 2023
- Share of cereals that are allocated to animal feed32.3%Ranked 105th▲ 29· 2023
- Share of egg-laying hens in cage-free systems0%Ranked 43rd· 2018
- Share of employment in agriculture13.6%Ranked 96th—· 2025
- Share of employment in agriculture13.6%Ranked 96th—· 2025
- Share of expenditure spent on food27.9%Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of farms that are smallholders59.5Ranked 5th· 2003
- Share of habitable land needed for agriculture41.6%Ranked 98th· 2011
- Share of landowners which are female (%) (FAO (2017))5.9%Ranked 76th· 2011
- Share of land used for permanent meadows and pastures18.2%Ranked 86th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of people employed in agricultural sector14.3%Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of people employed in agricultural sector14.3%Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of people who are undernourished6.8%Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of people who are undernourished6.8%Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of the daily calorie supply that comes from animal protein3.5%Ranked 131st▼ 7· 2023
- Share of the population defined as severely food insecure5.9%Ranked 51st▼ 4· 2023
- Soybean production200,000Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Soybean production200,000Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Soybeans used for direct human food0Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Soybean yields2.4Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2024
- Sugar beet production5.09MRanked 12th—· 2024
- Sugar beet yield60Ranked 20th▼ 6· 2024
- Sugar cane production9.15MRanked 21st▲ 1· 2024
- Sugar cane yields91.9Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Sunflower seed production66,000Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2024
- Sunflower seed yields1Ranked 55th▼ 3· 2024
- Surface area (sq. km)1.75MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Taylor and Rising (2021)18.41MRanked 16th▼ 1· 2010
- Taylor and Rising (2021)27.51MRanked 25th▲ 11· 2010
- Taylor and Rising (2021)45.92MRanked 17th▲ 1· 2010
- Tobacco production20,947.7Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2024
- Tomato production3.23MRanked 11th—· 2024
- Tomato yields47.2Ranked 62nd—· 2024
- total_applied_nitrogen946,491.7Ranked 22nd· 2009
- total_applied_phosphorous191,993.7Ranked 23rd· 2009
- Total daily supply of fat per person83.3Ranked 110th▼ 7· 2023
- Total daily supply of protein per person79.6Ranked 116th▲ 1· 2023
- Total food expenditure448.5Ranked 98th—· 2023
- Total meat production2.8MRanked 27th▼ 1· 2024
- Total meat production2.8MRanked 27th▼ 1· 2024
- Total official flows (disbursements) for agriculture, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)2.99MRanked 121st▲ 9· 2023
- Total official flows (disbursements) for agriculture, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)1.3Ranked 130th▲ 7· 2024
- Total pesticide use5,856Ranked 57th▼ 2· 2023
- Total pesticide use per area of cropland0.33Ranked 140th▼ 3· 2023
- Urban land area (sq. km)16,217.1Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2015
- Urban land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.02Ranked 137th▼ 2· 2015
- Urban land area where elevation is below 5 meters (sq. km)259.7Ranked 36th▼ 5· 2015
- Value added per worker12,862.9Ranked 55th▼ 6· 2025
- Vegetables, primary production9.47MRanked 15th—· 2024
- Wheat2.6Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2024
- Wheat2.6Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2024
- Wheat production16.75MRanked 14th▲ 2· 2024
- Wheat yield2.6Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2024
- Wheat yields2.6Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2024
- Wheat yields2.6Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2024
- Wild fish used as fishmeal and oil (animal feed)21,499.4Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2015
- Yearly per capita supply of all meat29.9Ranked 127th▼ 4· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of cocoa beans0.66Ranked 101st▼ 17· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of dates7.1Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of eggs8.5Ranked 83rd▲ 3· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fish and seafood11.3Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fish and seafood11.3Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fruit338Ranked 36th▼ 10· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of fruit123.4Ranked 36th▼ 10· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of milk - excluding butter26.5Ranked 145th▼ 9· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of other meat0.1Ranked 126th▼ 19· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of poultry meat23.5Ranked 81st▲ 7· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of poultry meat23.5Ranked 81st▲ 7· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetables105.4Ranked 84th▼ 32· 2023
- Yearly per capita supply of vegetables288.7Ranked 84th▼ 32· 2023
12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%) - ER_FFS_CMPT_GDP
- 12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%) - ER_FFS_CMPT_GDP12.3%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2021
- 12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars) - ER_FFS_CMPT_PC_CD670.2Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2021
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking99%Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking (% of population)95.7Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, rural (% of rural population)93.3Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2023
- Access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking, urban (% of urban population)98.8Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Access to clean fuels for cooking99%Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Access to electricity, rural (% of rural population)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use)1Ranked 116th▲ 4· 2023
- Annual change in coal consumption0.39Ranked 22nd▼ 22· 2024
- Annual change in fossil fuel consumption1.7Ranked 42nd▲ 36· 2024
- Annual change in gas consumption-11.9Ranked 70th▲ 66· 2024
- Annual change in hydropower consumption-9.6Ranked 67th▲ 64· 2024
- Annual change in low-carbon energy consumption-7.2Ranked 75th▲ 62· 2024
- Annual change in low-carbon energy consumption-7.2Ranked 75th▲ 62· 2024
- Annual change in nuclear power consumption1.7Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2024
- Annual change in oil consumption13.2Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2024
- Annual change in primary energy consumption-6.3Ranked 190th▲ 185· 2024
- Annual change in primary energy consumption-0.18%Ranked 161st▲ 82· 2024
- Annual change in renewables consumption-8.9Ranked 78th▲ 67· 2024
- Annual change in solar and wind power consumption0.63Ranked 51st▼ 14· 2024
- Annual change in solar power consumption0.53Ranked 56th▼ 8· 2024
- Annual change in solar power consumption0.53Ranked 56th▼ 8· 2024
- Annual change in wind power consumption0.1Ranked 33rd▼ 10· 2024
- Annual deaths attributed air pollution from fossil fuels9,065Ranked 134th· 2015
- Annual percentage change in coal consumption2.1%Ranked 24th▼ 27· 2024
- Annual percentage change in fossil fuel consumption0.05%Ranked 50th▲ 31· 2024
- Annual percentage change in gas consumption-0.48%Ranked 55th▲ 33· 2024
- Annual percentage change in hydropower consumption-17.3%Ranked 67th▲ 64· 2024
- Annual percentage change in low-carbon energy consumption-9.4%Ranked 76th▲ 71· 2024
- Annual percentage change in oil consumption1.3%Ranked 44th▲ 10· 2024
- Annual percentage change in renewables consumption-14.8%Ranked 79th▲ 75· 2024
- Annual percentage change in solar and wind power consumption13.6%Ranked 38th▼ 18· 2024
- Annual percentage change in solar power consumption31.7%Ranked 30th▼ 27· 2024
- Annual percentage change in solar power consumption31.7%Ranked 30th▼ 27· 2024
- Annual percentage change in wind power consumption3.4%Ranked 34th▼ 5· 2024
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Clean (GW)15Ranked 36th—· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (GW)76.6Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (GW)76.6Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (GW)11.8Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (GW)14Ranked 37th—· 2025
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (GW)2.2Ranked 52nd▼ 9· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Bioenergy (GW)0.02Ranked 50th▼ 9· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Gas (GW)76.6Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Hydro (GW)11.8Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Nuclear (GW)1Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Other Fossil (GW)0.06Ranked 58th▼ 37· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Solar (GW)1.8Ranked 45th▼ 19· 2025
- Capacity — Fuel — Wind (GW)0.38Ranked 49th▼ 1· 2025
- Coal consumption18.5Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Coal consumption18.5Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Coal consumption18.5Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2024
- Coal consumption per capita201.5Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2024
- Coal consumption per capita201.5Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2024
- Coal consumption per capita201.5Ranked 65th▼ 1· 2024
- Coal production10.4Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2016
- Coal production per capita123.5Ranked 52nd—· 2016
- Coal production per capita123.5Ranked 52nd—· 2016
- Combustible renewables and waste (% of total energy)0.19Ranked 131st—· 2023
- Death rate from protein-energy malnutrition among both sexes0.14Ranked 13th—· 2021
- Electricity demand395.6Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity demand — Demand — Demand (TWh)395.6Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity demand — Demand per capita — Demand per capita (MWh)4.3Ranked 51st▼ 16· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Clean (%)5.7%Ranked 83rd▼ 67· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Clean (TWh)22.6Ranked 49th▲ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (%)94.3%Ranked 7th▼ 25· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (TWh)373.2Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (%)94.1%Ranked 5th▼ 21· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (TWh)372.5Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (%)3.3%Ranked 76th▼ 51· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (TWh)13.1Ranked 39th—· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (%)3.9%Ranked 86th▼ 65· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (TWh)15.2Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (%)0.55%Ranked 84th▼ 66· 2025
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (TWh)2.2Ranked 59th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal0.73Ranked 50th▼ 15· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal0.73Ranked 50th▼ 15· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal per person7.9Ranked 57th▼ 18· 2025
- Electricity generation from coal per person7.9Ranked 50th▼ 23· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels373.2Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels373.2Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels373.2Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person4,038.4Ranked 12th▼ 22· 2025
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person4,038.4Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Electricity generation from gas354.4Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from gas per person3,834.7Ranked 8th▼ 8· 2025
- Electricity generation from hydropower18.9Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from hydropower13Ranked 33rd—· 2025
- Electricity generation from hydropower per person141Ranked 57th▼ 22· 2025
- Electricity generation from low-carbon sources22.6Ranked 50th▲ 5· 2025
- Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person244.1Ranked 84th▼ 33· 2025
- Electricity generation from nuclear7.4Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from nuclear power per person79.5Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation from oil18.1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Electricity generation from oil per person195.8Ranked 22nd▼ 28· 2025
- Electricity generation from other renewables, excluding bioenergy0Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation from other renewables, including bioenergy0.03Ranked 69th▼ 11· 2025
- Electricity generation from renewables15.2Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation from renewables per person164.6Ranked 87th▼ 36· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power2.2Ranked 58th▼ 3· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power2.2Ranked 58th▼ 3· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power per person23.3Ranked 80th▼ 42· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar power0.9Ranked 63rd▼ 5· 2025
- Electricity generation from solar power0.9Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power0.9Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power900.4Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power per person9.7Ranked 81st▼ 51· 2025
- Electricity generation from wind power1.3Ranked 51st—· 2025
- Electricity generation from wind power1,247.5Ranked 46th—· 2024
- Electricity generation from wind power1.2Ranked 46th—· 2024
- Electricity generation from wind power1.3Ranked 51st—· 2025
- Electricity generation from wind power per person13.5Ranked 72nd▼ 17· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Bioenergy (%)0.01%Ranked 72nd▼ 39· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Bioenergy (TWh)0.03Ranked 66th▼ 11· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Coal (%)0.18%Ranked 58th▼ 21· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Coal (TWh)0.73Ranked 50th▼ 16· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Gas (%)89.5%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Gas (TWh)354.4Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Hydro (%)3.3%Ranked 65th▼ 48· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Hydro (TWh)13Ranked 33rd—· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Nuclear (%)1.9%Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Nuclear (TWh)7.4Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Fossil (%)4.6%Ranked 18th▼ 62· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Fossil (TWh)18.1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Solar (%)0.23%Ranked 81st▼ 68· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Solar (TWh)0.9Ranked 63rd▼ 5· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Wind (%)0.32%Ranked 74th▼ 18· 2025
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Wind (TWh)1.3Ranked 51st▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity generation — Total — Total Generation (TWh)395.8Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- Electricity imports — Electricity imports — Net Imports (TWh)-0.18Ranked 46th▼ 49· 2025
- Electricity production from coal sources (% of total)0.18Ranked 81st—· 2023
- Electricity production from hydroelectric sources (% of total)4.4Ranked 100th▲ 1· 2023
- Electricity production from natural gas sources (% of total)78.6Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2023
- Electricity production from nuclear sources (% of total)1.6Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Electricity production from oil, gas and coal sources (% of total)93.9Ranked 24th▼ 17· 2022
- Electricity production from oil sources (% of total)14.8Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2023
- Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (kWh)2.82BRanked 59th▼ 12· 2021
- Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (% of total)0.79Ranked 163rd▼ 13· 2021
- Electric power transmission and distribution losses (% of output)10Ranked 70th▼ 2· 2023
- Energy imports, net (% of energy use)-32.5%Ranked 106th▲ 2· 2022
- Energy imports, net (% of energy use)-32.5Ranked 106th▲ 2· 2022
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (megajoules per constant 2021 purchasing power parity GDP)8.4Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)9.3Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2021
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)9.3Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2021
- Energy use (kg of oil equivalent) per $1,000 GDP (constant 2021 PPP)199.4Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Energy use (kg of oil equivalent per capita)3,399.1Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Energy use per capita39,531.6Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Final energy4.9Ranked 39th—· 2012
- Fossil fuel consumption per capita38,409Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Fossil fuel consumption per capita38,409Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Fossil fuel consumption per capita38.4Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Fossil fuel energy consumption (% of total)0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Fossil fuels93.9%Ranked 24th▼ 17· 2022
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)81.82BRanked 2nd—· 2023
- Gas consumption2,453.9Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Gas consumption2,453.9Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Gas consumption2,453.9Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Gas consumption per capita26,799.1Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Gas consumption per capita26,799.1Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Gas production2,629.2Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Gas production2,629.2Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Gas production per capita28,712.7Ranked 16th—· 2024
- Gas production per capita28,712.7Ranked 16th—· 2024
- GDP per unit of energy use (constant 2021 PPP $ per kg of oil equivalent)5Ranked 134th▼ 2· 2023
- GDP per unit of energy use (PPP $ per kg of oil equivalent)5.6Ranked 134th▼ 2· 2023
- Hidden Hunger Index in pre-school children25Ranked 42nd· 2009
- Hydropower consumption per capita502.7Ranked 43rd▲ 4· 2024
- Industrial uses (often fuel)60,000Ranked 61st▲ 2· 2023
- Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity (watts per capita)141.5Ranked 115th▲ 4· 2024
- Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity (watts per capita) - All renewables139.7Ranked 106th▲ 1· 2023
- International financial flows to developing countries in support of clean energy R&D and renewable energy production0Ranked 120th▲ 8· 2023
- International financial flows to developing countries in support of clean energy research and development and renewable energy production, including in hybrid systems (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)0Ranked 127th▲ 3· 2024
- Investment in energy with private participation (current US$)94.5MRanked 34th▲ 9· 2017
- Lifecycle carbon intensity of electricity generation659.5Ranked 8th▼ 17· 2025
- Low-carbon energy consumption per capita756.8Ranked 67th▲ 4· 2024
- Low-carbon energy consumption per capita0.76Ranked 66th▲ 4· 2024
- Minimum dietary energy requirement1,858Ranked 59th▼ 6· 2024
- Net electricity imports-0.18Ranked 46th▼ 49· 2025
- Net electricity imports as a share of demand-0.05%Ranked 47th▼ 40· 2025
- Nuclear power consumption per capita195.7Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of people with access to clean fuels for cooking86.71MRanked 12th—· 2023
- Number of people with access to electricity90.61MRanked 15th—· 2023
- Number of people without access to clean fuels for cooking3.9MRanked 58th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of people without access to electricity0Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of people without access to electricity0Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of people without clean fuels for cooking and heating1.2MRanked 80th—· 2016
- Oil consumption1,044.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Oil consumption1,044.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Oil consumption1,044.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Oil consumption1,044.6Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Oil consumption per capita11,408.4Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2024
- Oil production2,726.7Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2024
- Oil production per capita29,777.6Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2024
- Other renewables (including geothermal and biomass)0.11Ranked 66th—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Clean (mtCO2)0.41Ranked 23rd▼ 13· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (mtCO2)260.6Ranked 84th▼ 76· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (mtCO2)260Ranked 85th▼ 64· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (mtCO2)0.32Ranked 23rd▼ 15· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (mtCO2)0.37Ranked 22nd▼ 13· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (mtCO2)0.05Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Power sector emissions — CO2 intensity — CO2 intensity (gCO2/kWh)659.5Ranked 83rd▼ 81· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Bioenergy (mtCO2)0.01Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Coal (mtCO2)0.66Ranked 12th—· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Gas (mtCO2)248.1Ranked 75th▼ 31· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Hydro (mtCO2)0.31Ranked 22nd▼ 10· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Nuclear (mtCO2)0.04Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Other Fossil (mtCO2)11.9Ranked 64th▼ 44· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Solar (mtCO2)0.04Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Wind (mtCO2)0.01Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Power sector emissions — Total — Total emissions (mtCO2)261Ranked 85th▼ 86· 2025
- Primary energy consumption3,589.8Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption3,589.8Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from fossil fuels3,517Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from hydropower46Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from low-carbon sources69.3Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from nuclear power17.9Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from renewables51.4Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from solar and wind power5.2Ranked 57th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from solar power2.2Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption from wind power3Ranked 46th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per capita39,203.6Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per capita39,203.6Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per GDP2.2Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- Primary energy consumption per GDP2.2Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2022
- Primary school99.2%Ranked 2nd· 2012
- Proportion of population with access to electricity, by urban/rural (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Proportion of population without primary reliance on clean fuels and technologies for cooking (%) - Residence area type: Total1%Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2024
- Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technologies for cooking (%) - Residence area type: Total99%Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technology (%)99Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Public private partnerships investment in energy (current US$)94.5MRanked 33rd▲ 19· 2017
- Renewable capacity: Bioenergy22.1Ranked 98th—· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Renewable hydropower11,781Ranked 20th—· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Solar photovoltaic1,781.6Ranked 50th▼ 16· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Total renewable energy13,963.1Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Wind energy378.3Ranked 56th▲ 1· 2025
- Renewable electricity output (% of total electricity output)4.2Ranked 169th▲ 23· 2021
- Renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption (%)0.78%Ranked 192nd▲ 2· 2022
- Renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption (%)0.92Ranked 189th▼ 4· 2023
- Renewable generation: Renewable hydropower12,619Ranked 43rd—· 2023
- Renewable generation: Solar photovoltaic735.6Ranked 64th▲ 7· 2023
- Renewable generation: Total renewable energy14,189Ranked 58th▲ 3· 2023
- Renewables consumption per capita561.1Ranked 69th▲ 5· 2024
- Renewables (excl. hydroelectric)0.79%Ranked 162nd▼ 13· 2021
- Share of cereals that are allocated to other uses such as biofuel production0.24%Ranked 105th▼ 5· 2023
- Share of dietary energy from carbohydrates62.9%Ranked 61st▼ 5· 2023
- Share of dietary energy from fats26.1%Ranked 113th▼ 12· 2023
- Share of dietary energy from protein11.1%Ranked 120th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of dietary energy supply derived from cereals, roots and tubers52%Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2021
- Share of direct primary energy consumption that comes from gas69.2%Ranked 6th—· 2024
- Share of direct primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power0.21%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by bioenergy0.01%Ranked 77th▼ 44· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by coal0.18%Ranked 57th▼ 21· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by coal0.18%Ranked 57th▼ 21· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by coal0.18%Ranked 57th▼ 21· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by fossil fuels94.3%Ranked 7th▼ 26· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by gas89.5%Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by hydropower3.3%Ranked 64th▼ 51· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by low-carbon sources5.7%Ranked 82nd▼ 67· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by nuclear power1.9%Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by nuclear power1.9%Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by oil4.6%Ranked 18th▼ 63· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by renewables3.8%Ranked 86th▼ 66· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by solar and wind power0.54%Ranked 83rd▼ 71· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by solar power0.23%Ranked 82nd▼ 77· 2025
- Share of electricity generated by wind power0.32%Ranked 73rd▼ 20· 2025
- Share of final energy consumption used by agriculture, forestry and fishing5.6%Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from coal0.51%Ranked 64th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from fossil fuels98.1%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from gas68.4%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from hydropower1.3%Ranked 50th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from low-carbon sources1.9%Ranked 68th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from low-carbon sources1.9%Ranked 68th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power0.5%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power0.5%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from nuclear power0.5%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from oil29.1%Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from oil29.1%Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from renewables1.4%Ranked 67th—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from solar and wind power0.15%Ranked 72nd—· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from solar power0.06%Ranked 73rd▼ 1· 2024
- Share of primary energy consumption that comes from wind power0.08%Ranked 60th—· 2024
- Share of rural population with access100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population without access to clean fuels for cooking1%Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2024
- Solar and wind power consumption per capita57.2Ranked 70th▲ 2· 2024
- Solar photovoltaic capacity0.78Ranked 63rd▲ 1· 2024
- Solar power consumption per capita24Ranked 70th▼ 1· 2024
- Thermal equivalent efficiency factors0.41Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Total deaths from protein-energy malnutrition among both sexes125.6Ranked 105th▼ 2· 2021
- Total electricity demand per person4,280.6Ranked 53rd▼ 18· 2025
- Total electricity generation395.8Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2025
- Total electricity generation as share of primary energy11.2%Ranked 72nd▲ 1· 2024
- Total electricity generation per person4,282.5Ranked 45th▼ 22· 2025
- Total electricity generation per person4,282.5Ranked 44th▼ 21· 2025
- Total solar capacity0.78Ranked 67th▲ 2· 2024
- Total wind capacity0.38Ranked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- Urban98.8Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Wind consumption3Ranked 46th—· 2024
- Wind power consumption per capita33.2Ranked 60th▲ 1· 2024
14.1.1 - Beach litter per square kilometer (Number) - EN_MAR_BEALITSQ
- 14.1.1 - Beach litter per square kilometer (Number) - EN_MAR_BEALITSQ897,538.4Ranked 11th· 2021
- 17.7.1 - Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars) - DC_ENVTECH_IMP4.25BRanked 45th▲ 5· 2018
- Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare)137.7Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2025
- Above-ground biomass in forest (tonnes per hectare)137.7Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2020
- Absolute deaths from ambient PM2.5 air pollution- State of Global Air33,300Ranked 91st—· 2015
- Afforestation0Ranked 67th▼ 10· 2020
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)51Ranked 41st· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)9Ranked 9th· 2019
- Age-standardized mortality rate attributed to household and ambient air pollution (deaths per 100,000 population)58Ranked 39th· 2019
- Agricultural water withdrawal86BRanked 3rd▼ 3· 2005
- Agricultural water withdrawals92.2%Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2022
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)10.6%Ranked 54th▼ 10· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)12,862.9Ranked 55th▼ 6· 2025
- Amount of tracked exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)2.74BRanked 43rd—· 2018
- Annual area burnt by wildfires111,667Ranked 58th▲ 6· 2026
- Annual area burnt per wildfire251.5Ranked 82nd▼ 16· 2026
- Annual change in domestic forest area0Ranked 78th—· 2025
- Annual change in forest area0Ranked 78th—· 2025
- Annual change in forest area as share of forest area0%Ranked 80th—· 2025
- Annual deforestation as share of forest area0%Ranked 87th▼ 15· 2020
- Annual forest area change rate (%)0Ranked 56th▼ 4· 2025
- Annual forest area change rate (%)0.06%Ranked 49th▲ 41· 2020
- Annual forest change0%Ranked 79th—· 2025
- Annual freshwater withdrawals92.95BRanked 6th—· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, agriculture (% of total freshwater withdrawal)92.2Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, agriculture (% of total freshwater withdrawal)92.2%Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal)6.6%Ranked 154th▼ 3· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal)6.6Ranked 154th▼ 3· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, industry (% of total freshwater withdrawal)1.2Ranked 155th▼ 1· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, industry (% of total freshwater withdrawal)1.2%Ranked 155th▼ 1· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)93Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources)72.3Ranked 25th—· 2022
- Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter) - Urban34.1Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2019
- Annual number of fires444Ranked 57th▲ 8· 2026
- Annual number of fires444Ranked 57th▲ 8· 2026
- Annual share of the total land area burnt by wildfires0.06%Ranked 99th▼ 9· 2026
- AQLI28.7Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2024
- Area from inland water bodies6.13MRanked 9th—· 2019
- Area of degraded mountain land (square kilometres)26,354.1Ranked 7th—· 2021
- Area of planted forest1.56MRanked 32nd—· 2025
- Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)38.2Ranked 98th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)36.7%Ranked 99th—· 2024
- Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)67.2%Ranked 38th—· 2024
- Average proportion of Marine Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)67.2Ranked 43rd—· 2025
- Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)40.9Ranked 96th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)44%Ranked 88th—· 2024
- Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)41.2Ranked 120th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)43.9%Ranked 106th—· 2024
- Basel Convention60%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2025
- Baseline water stress4.7Ranked 142nd· 2023
- Beach litter items per unit of surface area (Number of items per 100 square meters)7Ranked 87th· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the beach (%)89.9Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the beach (Tonnes)11,269Ranked 62nd▲ 1· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the ocean (%)10.1Ranked 119th▲ 3· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the ocean (Tonnes)1,267Ranked 71st▼ 2· 2021
- Beef1.2Ranked 123rd▼ 1· 2023
- Biologically sustainable100%Ranked 1st· 2018
- Bird species, threatened29Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2022
- Bird species, threatened29Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2022
- Bottom trawl10,764.7Ranked 70th▲ 3· 2018
- Built-up Area828,055.1Ranked 17th—· 2025
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons)789,229Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)9.1Ranked 180th—· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)1.6Ranked 90th▲ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)175.7Ranked 187th—· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)101.5Ranked 135th▲ 2· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e)135.8Ranked 186th▲ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)63.9Ranked 183rd▼ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e)204.3Ranked 184th▲ 2· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e)146.1Ranked 186th—· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)297.6Ranked 145th▼ 3· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)829Ranked 194th▲ 1· 2024
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Deforestation (Mt CO2e)71.5Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Forest Land (Mt CO2e)-50Ranked 151st▼ 3· 2023
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Organic Soil (Mt CO2e)0Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2020
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Other Land (Mt CO2e)0Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2023
- Carbon dioxide (CO2) net fluxes from LULUCF - Total excluding non-tropical fires (Mt CO2e)21.5Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2023
- Carbon intensity of GDP (kg CO2e per 2021 PPP $ of GDP)0.52Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Carbon intensity of GDP (kg CO2e per constant 2015 US$ of GDP)1.6Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2024
- Change in maximum river flow (%)3.5Ranked 108th▼ 9· 2024
- Change in minimum river flow (%)-1Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2024
- Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)0.17Ranked 132nd▼ 24· 2022
- Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)0.17%Ranked 117th▼ 18· 2022
- Consumption of controlled substance (relative to 1986) - Chemical: All (Ozone-depleting)2.9Ranked 78th▲ 3· 2021
- Consumption of controlled substance (zero-filled) - Chemical: All (Ozone-depleting)123.8Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2021
- Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries that established national targets in accordance with Aichi Biodiversity Target 2 of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 in their National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2022
- Countries that established national targets in accordance with or similar to Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Target 14 in their national biodiversity strategy and action plans (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2026
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing-House (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries with procedures in law or policy for participation by service users/communities in planning program in water resources planning and management, by level of definition in procedures (10 = Clearly defined; 5 = Not clearly defined ; 0 = NA)10Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs in water resources planning and management, by level of participation (3 = High; 2 = Moderate; 1 = Low; 0 = NA)2Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Deaths attributed to household air pollution9Ranked 9th· 2019
- Deforestation0Ranked 85th▼ 13· 2020
- Degree of application of a legal/regulatory/policy/institutional framework which recognizes and protects access rights for small-scale fisheries (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)4Ranked 2nd· 2018
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation (%)40Ranked 52nd▲ 23· 2020
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation (%)40%Ranked 52nd▲ 23· 2020
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, enabling environment (%)40Ranked 50th▲ 33· 2020
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, financing (%)36Ranked 41st▲ 8· 2020
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, institutions and participation (%)39Ranked 55th▲ 28· 2020
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, management instruments (%)45Ranked 44th▲ 9· 2020
- discards29,393.7Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2018
- Discards29,393.7Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2018
- Domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material (tonnes) - Total or no breakdown10Ranked 80th▼ 13· 2023
- Drought risk2.9Ranked 88th· 2023
- Droughts, floods, extreme temperatures (% of population, average 1990-2009)3.1Ranked 23rd· 2009
- Electronic waste collected, per capita (KG)6.2Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Electronic waste collected (Tonnes)560,000Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Electronic waste generated, per capita (Kg)6.2Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2023
- Electronic waste generated (Tonnes)560,000Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Electronic waste recycled, per capita (Kg)6.2Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2023
- Electronic waste recycled (Tonnes)560,000Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Endemic amphibian species3Ranked 47th· 2025
- Endemic bird species1Ranked 43rd· 2025
- Endemic mammal species10Ranked 29th· 2025
- Endemic reef-forming coral species0Ranked 9th· 2025
- Estimated number of wild-caught fish6.1BRanked 31st· 2019
- Excess nitrogen649,454.7Ranked 18th· 2009
- excess_phosphorous_total102,843.1Ranked 18th· 2009
- Exported beach litter originating from national land-based sources (Tonnes)12,764Ranked 68th—· 2022
- Exported deforestation0.12Ranked 141st▼ 2· 2023
- Exports to Oceania0.01%Ranked 144th▼ 11· 2014
- Extent of human made wetlands (square kilometres)416.2Ranked 13th▼ 23· 2025
- Extent of inland wetlands (square kilometres)32,735.9Ranked 11th▼ 28· 2025
- F-gases emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)20.1Ranked 140th—· 2024
- Fish catch1.5MRanked 21st▼ 2· 2024
- Fish species, threatened84Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2022
- Fish species, threatened84Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2022
- Food waste per capita (KG)134.9Ranked 108th▼ 67· 2022
- Food waste (Tonnes)11.94MRanked 17th▼ 1· 2022
- Forest area10.75MRanked 50th—· 2025
- Forest area as a proportion of total land area (%)6.6Ranked 173rd▲ 1· 2025
- Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares)0Ranked 84th▲ 3· 2024
- Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares)0Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2024
- Forest area (thousands of hectares)10,751Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2025
- Forest expansion0Ranked 75th▼ 12· 2020
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%)27.8Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)104.6Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2024
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars)1,142.3Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2024
- Freshwater crabs3Ranked 23rd· 2025
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (number of tables)0Ranked 12th—· 2021
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (Tourism Satellite Account tables)0Ranked 8th—· 2021
- Imported deforestation10,074.5Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Imports per person0.03Ranked 100th▲ 15· 2018
- Industrial259,979Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2018
- Industrial water withdrawal1.1BRanked 31st▼ 11· 2005
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area change (%)5.9Ranked 131st▲ 1· 2022
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area (% of total land area)3.4%Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2022
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area (% of total land area)3.4Ranked 18th—· 2022
- Lakes and rivers permanent water area (square kilometres)59,506.3Ranked 9th—· 2022
- Lakes and rivers seasonal water area change (%)59.5Ranked 95th▼ 1· 2022
- Lakes and rivers seasonal water area (% of total land area)0.71Ranked 49th—· 2022
- Lakes and rivers seasonal water area (square kilometres)12,384.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Land area in hectares162.25MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Land area (sq. km)1.62MRanked 17th—· 2023
- Land area (thousands of hectares)162,250Ranked 17th—· 2025
- Legislation, Regulation, Act related to the prevention of introduction and management of Invasive Alien Species (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources81.3Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2022
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources (%)80.4Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources (%) - No breakdown81.3%Ranked 22nd—· 2022
- Mammal species, threatened18Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Mammal species, threatened18Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2022
- Mangrove area (square kilometres)111.8Ranked 57th▲ 1· 2020
- Mangrove total area change (%)-21.7%Ranked 94th▲ 5· 2020
- Mangrove total area change (%)-21.7Ranked 99th▲ 3· 2020
- Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters)0.9Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2025
- Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters)0.9%Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2025
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)24Ranked 161st▲ 1· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)1.4Ranked 146th▼ 2· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)132.9Ranked 173rd—· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.08Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)0.43Ranked 68th▲ 3· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.31Ranked 118th▲ 6· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e)2.7Ranked 162nd▲ 7· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e)14Ranked 177th—· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)72.6Ranked 134th▲ 7· 2024
- Methane (CH4) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)175.7Ranked 194th—· 2024
- Methyl Chloroform0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Mismanaged plastic waste495,965Ranked 23rd· 2019
- Mismanaged plastic waste per capita6Ranked 79th· 2019
- Mortality rate attributed to unsafe water, unsafe sanitation and lack of hygiene from diarrhoea, intestinal nematode infections, malnutrition and acute respiratory infections (deaths per 100,000 population)2.9Ranked 40th· 2019
- Mountain area (square kilometres)931,338Ranked 5th—· 2021
- Mountain Green Cover Index - Total - Mountain Green Cover Index (MGCI)48%Ranked 142nd▼ 6· 2021
- Municipal waste collected (Tonnes)21.65MRanked 6th—· 2023
- Municipal waste exported (Tonnes)0Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Municipal waste generated (Tonnes)21.65MRanked 8th▼ 1· 2023
- Municipal waste imported (Tonnes)0Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Municipal water withdrawal6.2BRanked 10th▼ 9· 2005
- National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- National ocean science expenditure as a share of total research and development funding (%)0.63Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2017
- natural_ha_share38.3Ranked 124th▼ 5· 2010
- ND-GAIN Country Index47.5Ranked 93rd▲ 2· 2024
- Net traded deforestation10,074.4Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Agriculture (Mt CO2e)16.2Ranked 174th▼ 1· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Building (Energy) (Mt CO2e)1.2Ranked 154th▼ 3· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Fugitive Emissions (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.2Ranked 113th▲ 7· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Combustion (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.09Ranked 104th▼ 3· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Industrial Processes (Mt CO2e)6.5Ranked 189th—· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Power Industry (Energy) (Mt CO2e)0.15Ranked 95th▼ 5· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Transport (Energy) (Mt CO2e)4.5Ranked 175th▲ 2· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from Waste (Mt CO2e)1.2Ranked 164th▼ 6· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)63.5Ranked 118th▲ 1· 2024
- Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (total) excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)30Ranked 187th▼ 1· 2024
- Not using improved drinking water sources174,846.4Ranked 71st▲ 5· 2024
- Number of people in rural areas not using improved drinking water sources177,028.3Ranked 71st—· 2024
- Number of people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities0Ranked 127th▼ 5· 2024
- Number of people not using improved drinking water sources234,151.9Ranked 76th▲ 4· 2024
- Number of people not using improved sanitation facilities0Ranked 156th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of people not using safely managed drinking water sources5.12MRanked 43rd▼ 2· 2024
- Number of people using at least a basic drinking water source89.6MRanked 15th—· 2024
- Number of people with at least basic sanitation82.83MRanked 17th—· 2024
- Open defecation335,653.1Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2016
- Open defecation313,052.1Ranked 61st—· 2016
- Open dumps72.1%Ranked 17th· 2020
- Other uses189.1Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2015
- Outdoor air pollution exposure (population-weighted PM2.5)37.7Ranked 153rd▲ 1· 2024
- Ozone concentration74Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2015
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Basel Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)50Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Minamata Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)66.7Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Montreal Protocol on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Rotterdam Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)80.3Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Stockholm Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)22.2Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2025
- Per capita plastic waste0.14Ranked 57th· 2010
- Per capita plastic waste emitted to the ocean0.01Ranked 88th· 2019
- Permanent agriculture16.9Ranked 135th▲ 6· 2024
- Plant species (higher), threatened15Ranked 100th▲ 8· 2022
- Plastic percent of waste composition8.5Ranked 1st· 2007
- Plastic pollution entering the ocean through rivers928Ranked 77th· 2019
- Plastic waste emitted to the ocean928Ranked 46th· 2019
- Plastic waste emitted to the ocean per capita0.01Ranked 88th· 2019
- Plastic waste generation2.88MRanked 22nd· 2020
- Plastic waste generation (tonnes, total)3.92MRanked 17th· 2010
- PM2.5 air pollution, mean annual exposure (micrograms per cubic meter)40.2Ranked 178th▼ 6· 2023
- PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO guideline value (% of total)100Ranked 77th▲ 1· 2017
- PM2.5 exposure40.2Ranked 23rd▲ 6· 2023
- PM2.5 pollution (mean annual exposure)40.2Ranked 178th▼ 6· 2023
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-1 value (% of total)49.6Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2017
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-2 value (% of total)98.5Ranked 70th—· 2017
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-3 value (% of total)100Ranked 81st▼ 1· 2017
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)55.8Ranked 148th—· 2023
- Population in largest city9.73MRanked 25th▲ 1· 2025
- Population in the largest city (% of urban population)13.6Ranked 136th—· 2025
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million23.31MRanked 18th▲ 1· 2025
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million (% of total population)25.2Ranked 47th—· 2025
- Population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.93Ranked 156th—· 2015
- Population living in slums (% of urban population)44.7Ranked 42nd▲ 15· 2022
- Probability of mismanaged plastic waste reaching the ocean via rivers0.07%Ranked 101st· 2019
- Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)3Ranked 3rd· 2018
- Progress by countries in the degree of implementation of international instruments aiming to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (level of implementation: 1 lowest to 5 highest)3Ranked 3rd· 2018
- Proportion of degraded mountain land (%)2.8Ranked 55th—· 2021
- Proportion of degraded mountain land (%) - Total2.8%Ranked 55th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of electronic waste collected (%)100Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Proportion of electronic waste recycled (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels (not overexploited) (%)100Ranked 1st· 2018
- Proportion of fish stocks within biologically sustainable levels (not overexploited) (%)100%Ranked 1st· 2018
- Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)28.8Ranked 61st▼ 4· 2025
- Proportion of forest area with a long-term management plan (%)29%Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2020
- Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas (%)14.1Ranked 110th—· 2025
- Proportion of forest area within legally established protected areas (%)14.1%Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2020
- Proportion of population practicing open defecation, by urban/rural (%)0.4Ranked 110th—· 2016
- Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services, by urban/rural (%)94.4Ranked 45th—· 2024
- Proportion of primary schools with access to basic drinking water100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)26.4Ranked 94th—· 2024
- Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)26.4%Ranked 94th▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of wastewater safely treated, by activity and location (%)36.3Ranked 28th· 2022
- Proportion of wastewater treated, by activity and location (%)36.3Ranked 57th· 2022
- Readiness0.38Ranked 105th▲ 6· 2024
- Readiness: economic0.42Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Readiness: governance0.23Ranked 178th—· 2024
- Readiness: social0.49Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2024
- Red List Index0.9Ranked 74th—· 2025
- Red List Index0.86Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)1,435.4Ranked 114th▲ 1· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)1,435.4Ranked 114th▲ 1· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)1,435.4Ranked 114th▲ 1· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)128.5Ranked 47th—· 2022
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)128.5Ranked 47th—· 2022
- Reservoir maximum water area (% of total land area)0.06Ranked 91st—· 2022
- Reservoir maximum water area (square kilometres)1,110.1Ranked 39th—· 2022
- Reservoir minimum water area change (%)71.4Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2022
- Reservoir minimum water area (% of total land area)0.05Ranked 92nd▲ 2· 2022
- Reservoir minimum water area (square kilometres)802.2Ranked 36th—· 2022
- River flow maximum (m3/s)112,036Ranked 71st▼ 1· 2024
- River flow minimum (m3/s)4,902.2Ranked 90th▼ 1· 2024
- Riverine flood risk1.8Ranked 59th· 2023
- Rural population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.17Ranked 154th▼ 4· 2015
- Safely managed94.4%Ranked 45th—· 2024
- Settlements and infrastructure0.5Ranked 157th—· 2024
- share_global_excess_nitrogen0.86%Ranked 18th· 2009
- share_global_excess_phosphorous0.73%Ranked 18th· 2009
- Share of annual global forest expansion0%Ranked 75th▼ 12· 2020
- Share of deforestation driven by domestic consumption100%Ranked 10th▲ 6· 2013
- Share of deforestation that is exported0.05%Ranked 104th▼ 4· 2013
- Share of fish stocks that are overexploited0%Ranked 33rd· 2018
- Share of global deforestation0%Ranked 85th▼ 13· 2020
- Share of global forest area0.26%Ranked 50th—· 2025
- Share of global mismanaged plastic waste0.8%Ranked 23rd· 2019
- Share of global plastic waste emitted to the ocean0.09%Ranked 46th· 2019
- Share of global plastic waste exports0.3%Ranked 35th▼ 31· 2018
- Share of global plastic waste imports0.04%Ranked 69th▲ 16· 2018
- Share of land covered by forest6.6%Ranked 176th—· 2025
- Share of the population not using improved drinking water sources0.26%Ranked 126th—· 2024
- Share of the population using an improved drinking water source99.7%Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2024
- Share of the population using at least a basic drinking water source97.9%Ranked 56th▼ 4· 2024
- Share of the population using safely managed drinking water94.4%Ranked 45th—· 2024
- Share of the rural population using at least a basic drinking water source94.8%Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of the urban population using at least a basic drinking water source98.7%Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of total municipal solid waste collected100%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Share of urban population98.7%Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2024
- Sharks & Rays0Ranked 15th· 2025
- Surface water59,304Ranked 61st▼ 2· 2024
- Surface water4,068.9Ranked 55th▼ 2· 2024
- Surface water55,235.1Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2024
- Sustainable fisheries as a proportion of GDP0.2Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2023
- Terrain Ruggedness Index 100m (Nunn and Puga 2012)244.5Ranked 35th· 1996
- Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)7.8%Ranked 131st▲ 7· 2025
- Threatened endemic bird species0Ranked 27th· 2025
- Threatened endemic mammal species1Ranked 26th· 2025
- Threatened endemic reef-forming coral species0Ranked 5th· 2025
- Total61.1Ranked 143rd▲ 3· 2024
- total_deforestation5.5Ranked 138th▼ 3· 2023
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (% change from 1990)218.4Ranked 165th▼ 1· 2024
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF (Mt CO2e)1,054.8Ranked 195th—· 2024
- Total greenhouse gas emissions excluding LULUCF per capita (t CO2e/capita)11.5Ranked 178th—· 2024
- Total greenhouse gas emissions including LULUCF (Mt CO2e)1,051.6Ranked 170th▲ 1· 2023
- Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)460,000Ranked 125th▲ 21· 2023
- Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)0.66Ranked 123rd▼ 7· 2024
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for water supply and sanitation, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)680,000Ranked 114th▲ 12· 2023
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for water supply and sanitation, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)1.7Ranked 114th▼ 4· 2024
- Total plastic pollution560,725.4Ranked 195th· 2020
- Total plastic pollution per capita6.4Ranked 99th· 2020
- Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture to the country (number)1,934Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2025
- Total waste generation, by activity (Tonnes)265.56MRanked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Total wastewater generated (million m3/year)3,893Ranked 12th· 2022
- Total wastewater safely treated (million m3/year)1,415.1Ranked 9th· 2022
- Total wastewater treated (million m3/year)1,415.1Ranked 19th· 2022
- Total water withdrawal per capita1,301Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2005
- Trade-adjusted deforestation per person1.1Ranked 138th▲ 1· 2023
- Urban96.2%Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Urban population96.2%Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Urban population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.76Ranked 145th▼ 1· 2015
- Urban usage99.9%Ranked 10th▼ 5· 2024
- Using improved drinking water soures99.7%Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2024
- Vienna Convention and Montreal Protocol (Parties Subscribing each Year)1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Water productivity, total (constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal)5.3Ranked 149th▼ 1· 2022
- Water productivity, total (constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal)5.3Ranked 149th▼ 1· 2022
- Water Use Efficiency (United States dollars per cubic meter)5.2Ranked 132nd▼ 5· 2023
- Wetlands area (% of total land area)0.5Ranked 125th· 2017
- Wetlands area (% of total land area)0.5%Ranked 125th· 2017
- Wetlands area (square kilometres)8,387.5Ranked 48th· 2017
- Wildfire1.2Ranked 127th▼ 2· 2022
- Wild fish catch from bottom trawling10,764.7Ranked 70th▲ 3· 2018
- Yearly burned area across all land types647,754Ranked 48th▼ 9· 2024
- Yearly burned area in other land types107.3Ranked 66th▲ 13· 2024
- Yearly burned area in shrublands and grasslands298,590.2Ranked 40th▼ 10· 2024
- Yield gap versus nitrogen pollution effect20.1%Ranked 78th· 2020
other
Actual Progress
10 Mbits/s and over
- 10 Mbits/s and over5.82MRanked 30th▼ 1· 2023
- AI scholarly publications - Field: All2,968Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- AI scholarly publications per million people - Field: All32.4Ranked 70th▲ 4· 2024
- Annual number of objects launched into outer space4Ranked 18th▲ 10· 2025
- Annual patent applications10,210Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2021
- Any speed12Ranked 90th▼ 15· 2023
- AS numbers delegated851Ranked 23rd· 2026
- Both accounts12%Ranked 34th▲ 31· 2021
- Both sexes2.5%Ranked 36th▲ 2· 2021
- Carbon dioxide emissions from fuel combustion (millions of tonnes)727.4Ranked 139th▼ 5· 2023
- Carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP PPP (kilogrammes of CO2 per constant 2021 United States dollars)0.47Ranked 142nd▼ 2· 2023
- Cumulative number of objects launched into outer space24Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2025
- Developers898,557Ranked 40th▲ 4· 2026
- Female phone ownership (%)68.3%Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (FTE) - Business enterprise28.5Ranked 29th▼ 9· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (FTE) - Government11.3Ranked 61st▼ 1· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (FTE) - Higher education41Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (FTE) - Private non-profit20.6Ranked 32nd▼ 5· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Business enterprise27.5Ranked 37th▼ 15· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Government11.6Ranked 75th▼ 4· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Higher education37.5Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2021
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Private non-profit14.7Ranked 42nd▼ 4· 2021
- Female share of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) programmes, tertiary (%)31.2Ranked 53rd▼ 11· 2017
- Fixed broadband subscriptions11.04MRanked 22nd—· 2024
- Fixed broadband subscriptions11.04MRanked 22nd—· 2024
- Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people)12.1Ranked 92nd▼ 1· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions28.23MRanked 6th▼ 1· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions28.23MRanked 6th▼ 1· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people)30.8Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people)30.8Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2024
- GERD as a percentage of GDP0.73Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2021
- Git pushes331,042Ranked 80th▲ 29· 2026
- Individuals using the Internet, female (% of female population)77.7Ranked 56th▲ 4· 2021
- Individuals using the Internet, male (% of male population)79.5Ranked 56th▲ 7· 2021
- Interconnection facilities3Ranked 54th· 2026
- Internet exchange points2Ranked 30th· 2026
- IPv4 addresses delegated10.83MRanked 37th· 2026
- IPv6 prefixes delegated574Ranked 31st· 2026
- Landline phone subscriptions28.23MRanked 6th▼ 1· 2024
- Landline phone subscriptions30.8Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2024
- Male8.3%Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2021
- Mobile174.1Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions159.39MRanked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions159.39MRanked 10th▼ 1· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)174.1Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2024
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)174.1Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of Internet users69.52MRanked 15th▲ 1· 2021
- Patent applications per million people115.4Ranked 25th▲ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, both sexes (%)65%Ranked 87th▼ 7· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, female (%)75%Ranked 85th▼ 7· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, male (%)56.2%Ranked 74th▼ 6· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, both sexes (%)35%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, female (%)25%Ranked 9th—· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, male (%)43.8%Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education who are female (%)33.3%Ranked 55th▼ 7· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.76Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, both sexes (%)4.7%Ranked 54th▲ 7· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, female (%)4%Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, male (%)5.3%Ranked 81st▲ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, both sexes (%)5.2%Ranked 39th▼ 7· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, female (%)7.8%Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, male (%)3%Ranked 63rd▼ 10· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 4th—· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, both sexes (%)7.4%Ranked 54th▼ 8· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, female (%)11.4%Ranked 37th▼ 4· 2021
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, male (%)4%Ranked 76th▼ 2· 2021
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 12th▲ 5· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.81Ranked 18th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.6Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, both sexes (%)38%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 12th▼ 7· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension – adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.37Ranked 33rd· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.15Ranked 34th▲ 12· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, both sexes (%)13%Ranked 24th▲ 5· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, female (%)13%Ranked 23rd▲ 6· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, high socio-economic status (%)26%Ranked 21st▲ 6· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, low socio-economic status (%)4%Ranked 23rd▲ 9· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, male (%)12%Ranked 26th▲ 9· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, rural (%)7%Ranked 25th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Cognitive dimension, urban (%)19%Ranked 20th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, female (%)37%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, high socio-economic status (%)50%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, low socio-economic status (%)30%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, male (%)38%Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 12th▲ 7· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence – adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 16th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.67Ranked 11th▲ 5· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension - Confidence, both sexes (%)43%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, female (%)44%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, high socio-economic status (%)54%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, low socio-economic status (%)36%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, male (%)42%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, rural (%)40%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Confidence, urban (%)47%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment – adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 18th▲ 11· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment – adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.88Ranked 18th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment – adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.77Ranked 13th▲ 6· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension - Enjoyment, both sexes (%)48%Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, female (%)45%Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, high socio-economic status (%)56%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, low socio-economic status (%)43%Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, male (%)51%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, rural (%)45%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience – Non-cognitive dimension – Enjoyment, urban (%)51%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, rural (%)34%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Percentage of students in lower secondary showing proficiency in knowledge of environmental science and geoscience, urban (%)42%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 2G mobile network (%)99Ranked 25th▼ 9· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 3G mobile network (%)96.8Ranked 40th▼ 11· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 4G mobile network (%)94.2Ranked 43rd▼ 3· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 5G mobile network (%)8.2Ranked 64th▲ 2· 2024
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.73Ranked 17th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)5.5%Ranked 20th▲ 13· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, female (%)4.7%Ranked 20th▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, male (%)6.4%Ranked 20th▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 18th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)3.2%Ranked 21st▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, female (%)2.3%Ranked 20th▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, male (%)4%Ranked 20th▲ 15· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 25th▲ 9· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.22Ranked 17th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, both sexes (%)3%Ranked 29th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, female (%)2.4%Ranked 25th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.17Ranked 16th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, male (%)3.7%Ranked 25th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.24Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.45Ranked 17th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 18th▲ 7· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, female (%)0.5%Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, male (%)1.1%Ranked 17th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 14th▲ 12· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, female (%)0.9%Ranked 12th▲ 10· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, male (%)0.7%Ranked 10th▲ 8· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.64Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, both sexes (%)3.7%Ranked 19th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, female (%)2.9%Ranked 18th▲ 6· 2021
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, male (%)4.5%Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2021
- Repositories1.14MRanked 55th▲ 6· 2026
- Research and development expenditure as a proportion of GDP (%)0.73Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2021
- Researchers (FTE) - % Female29.4Ranked 55th▲ 1· 2021
- Researchers (HC) - % Female30.2Ranked 68th—· 2021
- Researchers (in full-time equivalent) per million inhabitants (per 1,000,000 population)2,239.7Ranked 38th▼ 9· 2021
- Researchers in R&D (per million people)2,239.7Ranked 38th▼ 9· 2021
- Researchers per million inhabitants (FTE)2,239.7Ranked 38th▼ 9· 2021
- Scientific and technical journal articles55,085.3Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Scientific and technical journal articles per million people607.9Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2023
- Secure Internet servers661,642Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2024
- Secure Internet servers (per 1 million people)7,225.7Ranked 64th—· 2024
- Share of people aged 15+ using a mobile money account12.4%Ranked 43rd▲ 28· 2021
- Share with a mobile money account12.4%Ranked 43rd▲ 28· 2021
- Total official flows for infrastructure, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)3.4Ranked 131st—· 2024
Agricultural raw materials exports (% of merchandise exports)
- Agricultural raw materials exports (% of merchandise exports)0.31Ranked 127th▼ 1· 2022
- Agricultural raw materials imports (% of merchandise imports)3Ranked 9th—· 2022
- All products12.1%Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2020
- Annual growth of exports of goods and services (%)17.2%Ranked 13th▼ 74· 2023
- Annual growth of imports of goods and services (%)3%Ranked 51st▼ 46· 2023
- China’s rank among import partners2Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2024
- Commercial service exports (current US$)1.36BRanked 64th▼ 8· 2000
- Commercial service imports (current US$)1.58BRanked 58th▲ 8· 2000
- Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service exports)2.9Ranked 137th▲ 5· 2000
- Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service imports)1.1Ranked 143rd▼ 2· 2000
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise exports (%)0.41%Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2023
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services exports (%)0.14%Ranked 51st▼ 4· 2022
- Difference in the value of goods exported to and imported by the US (DOTS (2017))4.87MRanked 123rd· 2016
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)109.89BRanked 37th—· 2025
- Export unit value index (2015 = 100)148.5Ranked 56th▲ 20· 2024
- Export value index (2015 = 100)176.5Ranked 59th▼ 29· 2024
- Export volume index (2015 = 100)118.8Ranked 81st▼ 45· 2024
- Food exports (% of merchandise exports)5.9Ranked 126th▲ 2· 2022
- Food imports (% of merchandise imports)29.5Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2022
- Fuel exports (% of merchandise exports)56.4Ranked 17th—· 2022
- Fuel imports (% of merchandise imports)2Ranked 155th▼ 6· 2022
- Goods28.35BRanked 33rd▼ 1· 2000
- High-technology exports (current US$)206.22MRanked 74th▼ 8· 2022
- ICT goods exports (% of total goods exports)0.01Ranked 109th▼ 4· 2022
- ICT goods imports (% total goods imports)6.1Ranked 45th▲ 25· 2022
- Imports from China as a share of total imports26.1%Ranked 27th▲ 12· 2024
- Imports of goods and services58.56BRanked 50th▼ 1· 2025
- Imports of goods from North America271.86MRanked 135th▼ 9· 2024
- Imports of goods from North America271.86MRanked 135th▼ 9· 2024
- Imports of palm oil229,000Ranked 34th▲ 10· 2023
- Imports of pandemic-related customs (per-capita)0.44Ranked 125th▼ 3· 2018
- Import unit value index (2015 = 100)124Ranked 108th▲ 4· 2024
- Import value index (2015 = 100)155.8Ranked 82nd▼ 11· 2024
- Import volume index (2015 = 100)125.6Ranked 81st▼ 4· 2024
- Insurance and financial services (% of commercial service exports)10.7Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2000
- Insurance and financial services (% of commercial service imports)13.5Ranked 9th▼ 7· 2000
- Manufactures exports (% of merchandise exports)31.3%Ranked 87th▲ 5· 2022
- Manufactures exports (% of merchandise exports)31.3Ranked 87th▲ 5· 2022
- Manufactures imports (% of merchandise imports)58.1Ranked 102nd▼ 11· 2022
- Medium and high-tech exports (% manufactured exports)49.7Ranked 41st▼ 2· 2022
- Merchandise exports by the reporting economy (current US$)14.07BRanked 83rd▲ 8· 2023
- Merchandise exports by the reporting economy, residual (% of total merchandise exports)0.07Ranked 22nd▼ 4· 2023
- Merchandise exports (current US$)113.23BRanked 38th▲ 1· 2025
- Merchandise exports to economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise exports)10.7Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2023
- Merchandise exports to high-income economies (% of total merchandise exports)19.1Ranked 188th▼ 2· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise exports)31.1Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise exports)29.3Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise exports)0.15Ranked 146th▲ 38· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Middle East & North Africa (% of total merchandise exports)2.2Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise exports)17.3Ranked 12th▼ 10· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise exports)0.83Ranked 119th▲ 19· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies outside region (% of total merchandise exports)78.6Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies within region (% of total merchandise exports)2.2Ranked 177th▲ 7· 2023
- Merchandise exports, total (all partners)80.9BRanked 45th▼ 1· 2022
- Merchandise imports by the reporting economy (current US$)52.73BRanked 58th▲ 4· 2023
- Merchandise imports by the reporting economy, residual (% of total merchandise imports)0Ranked 82nd▼ 4· 2023
- Merchandise imports (current US$)65.63BRanked 54th▲ 4· 2025
- Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports)30.3Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports)50.6Ranked 133rd—· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise imports)31.5Ranked 35th▼ 5· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise imports)13Ranked 18th▼ 7· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise imports)0.6Ranked 152nd▲ 23· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Middle East & North Africa (% of total merchandise imports)0.85Ranked 85th▼ 2· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise imports)3.3Ranked 62nd▲ 23· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise imports)0.09Ranked 169th▲ 14· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies outside region (% of total merchandise imports)48.5Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies within region (% of total merchandise imports)0.85Ranked 197th▲ 1· 2023
- Merchandise imports, total (all partners)58.73BRanked 52nd▲ 1· 2022
- Ores and metals exports (% of merchandise exports)6.1Ranked 57th▲ 3· 2022
- Ores and metals imports (% of merchandise imports)2Ranked 72nd▼ 9· 2022
- Proportion of tariff lines applied to imports with zero-tariff (%) - Total or no breakdown31.9%Ranked 199th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of services in total goods and services exports4.7%Ranked 140th▼ 2· 2000
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products (%)15.2Ranked 3rd▼ 7· 2020
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)15.6Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%)12.1Ranked 49th▼ 9· 2020
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)12.1Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2020
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)12.1%Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2020
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products (%)12.8Ranked 9th▲ 7· 2020
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%)10.6Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2020
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, all products (%)20.3Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, manufactured products (%)19.7Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2020
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, primary products (%)22.2Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2020
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, all products (%)12.1Ranked 27th▲ 5· 2020
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, manufactured products (%)12.8Ranked 13th▲ 8· 2020
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products (%)10.6Ranked 58th▲ 4· 2020
- Transport services (% of commercial service exports)49.4Ranked 16th▼ 9· 2000
- Transport services (% of commercial service imports)72.4Ranked 6th▼ 21· 2000
- Travel services (% of commercial service exports)36.9Ranked 83rd▲ 8· 2000
- Travel services (% of commercial service imports)13Ranked 120th▲ 85· 2000