West Bank and Gaza
State of Palestine
Region Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & PakistanIncome Lower middle incomeCapital —ISO3 PSE
Human development
0.674
HDI, 0–1 scale
GDP per capita
4,272.5PPP $
2021 international $
Life expectancy
69.2yrs
At birth
Governance
36.8/100
Avg. of six WGI
Governance
Control of Corruption
- Control of Corruption36.3Ranked 134th▼ 3· 2024
- Government Effectiveness30Ranked 180th▲ 2· 2024
- Political Stability & Absence of Violence33.8Ranked 190th▲ 3· 2024
- Rule of Law39.9Ranked 164th▲ 6· 2024
- Regulatory Quality47.5Ranked 130th▲ 12· 2024
- Voice & Accountability33.3Ranked 178th▲ 11· 2024
- V-Dem electoral democracy0.08Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 1948
- V-Dem liberal democracy0.1Ranked 68th—· 1948
- Human rights index (V-Dem)0.36Ranked 71st—· 1948
- Civil liberties index (V-Dem)0.36Ranked 71st—· 1948
- Freedom of expression index (V-Dem)0.41Ranked 56th—· 1948
- Participatory democracy index (V-Dem)0.06Ranked 65th▼ 3· 1948
- Deliberative democracy index (V-Dem)0.05Ranked 76th▲ 3· 1948
- Egalitarian democracy index (V-Dem)0.11Ranked 59th▲ 7· 1948
- Women's political empowerment index (V-Dem)0.25Ranked 71st▼ 1· 1948
- Rule of law index (V-Dem)0.79Ranked 27th—· 1948
- 17.19.1 - Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen statistical capacity in developing countries (current United States dollars) - SG_STT_CAPTY1.37MRanked 50th▲ 6· 2020
- Absence of corruption Index (IDEA)31.5Ranked 130th▲ 64· 2021
- Access to justice for men0Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Access to justice for women0Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Access to justice Index (IDEA)57.2Ranked 92nd▲ 38· 2021
- Accountability index-0.29Ranked 133rd▼ 2· 2025
- Annual change in Checks on Government Index (IDEA)0.75Ranked 40th▼ 112· 2021
- Annual change in civil society Participation Index (IDEA)-7Ranked 75th▲ 56· 2021
- Annual change in democracy index (EIU)-0.6Ranked 30th▼ 26· 2020
- Annual change in Direct democracy Index (IDEA)0Ranked 36th▼ 12· 2021
- Annual change in Electoral Participation Index (IDEA)0Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2021
- Annual change in Fundamental Rights Index (IDEA)-7.4Ranked 147th▲ 21· 2021
- Annual change in Impartial Administration Index (IDEA)-17.6Ranked 151st▲ 148· 2021
- Annual change in Local Democracy Index (IDEA)0Ranked 31st▲ 22· 2021
- Annual change in Representative Government Index (IDEA)0Ranked 64th▼ 5· 2021
- Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force)0Ranked 166th▲ 1· 2020
- Armed forces personnel, total0Ranked 109th▲ 5· 2020
- Arms imports (SIPRI trend indicator values)2MRanked 84th▲ 4· 2023
- Bribery incidence (% of firms experiencing at least one bribe payment request)1.1Ranked 40th▲ 22· 2023
- BTI0Ranked 4th—· 1948
- Checks on Government Index (IDEA)33.4Ranked 147th▼ 1· 2021
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Citizen support for democracy-0.75Ranked 96th—· 2020
- Civil liberties index0.42Ranked 111th—· 2025
- Civil liberties Index (IDEA)52.5Ranked 116th▼ 3· 2021
- Civil liberties rating5Ranked 3rd—· 1995
- Civil society participation index0.3Ranked 56th▲ 1· 1948
- Civil society participation Index (IDEA)52.3Ranked 92nd▲ 25· 2021
- Clean elections index0Ranked 136th▼ 4· 2025
- Clean Elections Index (IDEA)0.3Ranked 168th▲ 2· 2021
- Clientelism Index0.28Ranked 112th▲ 1· 1948
- Common good justifications-1.4Ranked 93rd▲ 1· 1948
- Competitive elections0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Completeness of birth registration (%)99.2%Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Control of Corruption - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-0.57Ranked 134th▼ 3· 2024
- Control of Corruption - Governance score (0-100)36.3Ranked 134th▼ 3· 2024
- Core civil society index0.32Ranked 65th▼ 6· 1948
- Core civil society index0.28Ranked 117th▲ 3· 2025
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing-House (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Countries with at least one verified case of enforced disappearance of human rights defenders, journalists, and trade unionists (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with at least one verified case of killings of human rights defenders, journalists, and trade unionists (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant)2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant)2Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Country is a full democracy0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Degree to which the legal framework (including customary law) guarantees women’s equal rights to land ownership and/or control (1=No evidence to 6=Highest levels of guarantees)1Ranked 6th· 2021
- Deliberative democracy index0.07Ranked 138th▲ 2· 2025
- Deliberative political institutions index0.17Ranked 80th▲ 2· 1948
- Democracy index (EIU)38.3Ranked 104th▼ 1· 2020
- Diagonal accountability index-0.32Ranked 129th▼ 2· 2025
- Direct Democracy Index0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 1948
- Direct Democracy Index (IDEA)0Ranked 141st▼ 4· 2021
- Domestic policymaking free from foreign influence-1.8Ranked 97th▼ 1· 1948
- Effective parliament Index (IDEA)1.1Ranked 162nd▼ 5· 2021
- Egalitarian component index0.56Ranked 87th▼ 6· 2025
- Egalitarian democracy index0.19Ranked 114th▲ 3· 2025
- Egalitarian political institutions index0.39Ranked 52nd▲ 6· 1948
- Elected Government Index (IDEA)14.9Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2021
- Elected local governments0.26Ranked 66th▲ 2· 1948
- Elected officials index0Ranked 8th—· 1948
- Elections for chief executive0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Elections for chief executive and legislature0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Electoral democracy0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Electoral democracy0Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Electoral democracy index0.08Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 1948
- Electoral democracy index0.08Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 1948
- Electoral democracy index0.08Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 1948
- Electoral democracy index0.08Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 1948
- Electoral democracy index0.21Ranked 120th▼ 7· 2025
- Electoral democracy index0.08Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 1948
- Electoral Participation Index (IDEA)0Ranked 154th▼ 4· 2021
- Elite consultation-0.36Ranked 65th▲ 2· 1948
- Engaged society-0.82Ranked 81st▼ 1· 1948
- Equal access to power index0.17Ranked 71st▲ 2· 1948
- Equality before the law and individual liberty0.46Ranked 108th▲ 2· 2025
- Equality before the law and individual liberty index0.47Ranked 52nd▲ 2· 1948
- Equal resource distribution index0.37Ranked 50th▲ 1· 1948
- Equal rights of inheritance for sons and daughters when no will is left0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Equal rights protection index0.6Ranked 38th▲ 2· 1948
- Executive corruption index0.64Ranked 101st▲ 3· 2025
- Executive Corruption Index0.09Ranked 120th▲ 3· 1948
- Foreign policymaking free from foreign influence-2.3Ranked 104th▲ 5· 1948
- Free and fair elections0Ranked 2nd· 1923
- Free and fair elections index0Ranked 87th▲ 3· 1948
- Freedom of association and assembly Index (IDEA)51Ranked 77th▲ 3· 2021
- Freedom of association (thick)0.35Ranked 108th▼ 8· 2025
- Freedom of association thick index0.22Ranked 78th▼ 1· 1948
- Freedom of expression and alternative sources of information0.35Ranked 120th▲ 3· 2025
- Freedom of expression Index (IDEA)48.8Ranked 93rd▲ 1· 2021
- GDP per capita4,775.2Ranked 124th▲ 1· 2022
- Government censorship of the media-2Ranked 121st▼ 1· 1948
- Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.1Ranked 179th▲ 2· 2024
- Government Effectiveness - Governance score (0-100)30Ranked 179th▲ 2· 2024
- Horizontal accountability index-0.54Ranked 133rd▲ 4· 2025
- Human rights index0.36Ranked 71st—· 1948
- Human rights index0.36Ranked 71st—· 1948
- Human rights index0.36Ranked 71st—· 1948
- Index of the civil liberties (EIU)35.3Ranked 22nd—· 2020
- Index of the electoral process and pluralism (EIU)33.3Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2020
- Judicial constraints on the executive index0.48Ranked 100th▲ 7· 2025
- Judicial constraints on the executive index0.62Ranked 49th▲ 4· 1948
- Judicial Corruption Score0.56Ranked 81st▼ 1· 1948
- Justified political positions-2Ranked 117th▲ 4· 1948
- Learning-adjusted years of schooling8Ranked 84th▼ 2· 2020
- Legislative constraints on the executive index0.25Ranked 122nd▲ 1· 2025
- Legislative elections0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Liberal component index0.36Ranked 62nd▼ 1· 1948
- Liberal component index0.31Ranked 121st▲ 5· 2025
- Liberal democracy index0.11Ranked 125th▼ 3· 2025
- Liberal democracy index0.1Ranked 68th—· 1948
- Liberal political institutions0Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Life expectancy65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Media Corruption Score0.94Ranked 40th▲ 2· 1948
- Multiparty elections1Ranked 1st· 1923
- Multi-party elections for government's chief executive0Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Multiparty elections for legislature1Ranked 1st· 1923
- Neopatrimonialism index0.59Ranked 93rd▼ 1· 2025
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Australia (current US$)34.48MRanked 15th▼ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria (current US$)7.58MRanked 20th▲ 6· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$)29.31MRanked 7th▼ 5· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$)72.33MRanked 10th▼ 16· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Czechia (current US$)284,273Ranked 25th▲ 6· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$)39.3MRanked 8th▼ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$)331.71MRanked 5th▼ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$)9.32MRanked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$)70.55MRanked 31st▼ 2· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$)300.61MRanked 8th▼ 8· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Greece (current US$)338,490Ranked 4th▼ 8· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Hungary (current US$)1.77MRanked 26th▼ 4· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Iceland (current US$)1.02MRanked 7th—· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Ireland (current US$)19.22MRanked 8th▼ 5· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy (current US$)35.41MRanked 3rd▼ 7· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan (current US$)92.87MRanked 22nd▼ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Korea, Rep. (current US$)4.8MRanked 53rd▲ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Luxembourg (current US$)16.17MRanked 8th▼ 7· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Netherlands (current US$)23.39MRanked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, New Zealand (current US$)458,747Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway (current US$)114.78MRanked 2nd▼ 5· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Poland (current US$)4.74MRanked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Portugal (current US$)6.52MRanked 8th▼ 44· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Slovak Republic (current US$)203,082Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Slovenia (current US$)2.36MRanked 5th▼ 14· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Spain (current US$)75.75MRanked 1st▼ 3· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Sweden (current US$)41.33MRanked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland (current US$)118.42MRanked 2nd▼ 14· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Total (current US$)1.65BRanked 13th▼ 9· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom (current US$)52.5MRanked 14th▼ 15· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United States (current US$)146.19MRanked 51st▼ 5· 2023
- Number of conflict-related deaths (civilians), by sex, age and cause of death (Number)9,634Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2025
- Number of conflict-related deaths (non-civilians), by sex, age and cause of death (Number)12Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Number of conflict-related deaths (unknown), by sex, age and cause of death (Number)8,674Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Number of total conflict-related deaths, by sex, age and cause of death (Number)18,308Ranked 19th—· 2025
- Number of total conflict-related deaths per 100,000 population (Per 100,000 population)121.2Ranked 19th—· 2025
- Number of victims of intentional homicide, by sex (number)15Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of victims of intentional homicide per 100,000 population, by sex (victims per 100,000 population)0.27Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Participatory component index0.44Ranked 88th▼ 13· 2025
- Participatory democracy index0.15Ranked 115th▼ 1· 2025
- Participatory political institutions0.19Ranked 62nd▼ 2· 1948
- Physical violence index0.48Ranked 113th▲ 5· 2025
- Physical violence index0.45Ranked 65th▲ 2· 1948
- Plans fully funded1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Police reporting rate for physical assault in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)7.6Ranked 14th▼ 3· 2020
- Police reporting rate for robbery in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)36.3Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2020
- Political civil liberties index0.4Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2025
- Political civil liberties index0.29Ranked 78th▲ 1· 1948
- Political corruption index0.46Ranked 75th—· 2025
- Political Corruption Index0.15Ranked 102nd▼ 1· 1948
- Political Corruption Index0.15Ranked 102nd▼ 1· 1948
- Political liberties0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Political opposition0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Political regime0Ranked 7th—· 1948
- Political regime0Ranked 4th—· 1948
- Political regime0Ranked 3rd—· 1948
- Political regime0Ranked 4th—· 1948
- Political regime1Ranked 4th—· 1948
- Political regime0Ranked 3rd—· 1995
- Political regime (LIED+)0Ranked 8th—· 1947
- Political regime (trichotomous)1Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Political rights rating6Ranked 2nd—· 1995
- Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.9Ranked 189th▲ 3· 2024
- Political Stability - Governance score (0-100)33.8Ranked 189th▲ 3· 2024
- Presidentialism index0.6Ranked 65th▲ 5· 1948
- Press Freedom Index43.2Ranked 49th▲ 7· 2021
- Prevalence of hypertension in men aged 30–79 years, age-standardized40.7Ranked 52nd▲ 3· 2019
- Prevalence of hypertension in women aged 30–79 years, age-standardized37.4Ranked 69th▲ 3· 2019
- Prevalence rate of bribery, by sex (%)17Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2019
- Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget (%)91.2Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget (%)91.2Ranked 47th▲ 20· 2024
- Private civil liberties index0.32Ranked 76th▲ 2· 1948
- Private civil liberties index0.38Ranked 124th▲ 3· 2025
- Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Proportion of countries with independent National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Proportion of elected seats held by women in deliberative bodies of local government (%)21%Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of population subjected to physical assault in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)0.6Ranked 12th▼ 6· 2020
- Proportion of population subjected to robbery in the previous 12 months, by sex (%)3.2Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2020
- Proportion of population that feel safe walking alone around the area they live after dark (%)88.5Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of population who believe decision-making is inclusive (%)21.5Ranked 3rd▼ 20· 2024
- Proportion of population who believe decision-making is inclusive and responsive (%)21Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2024
- Proportion of population who believe decision-making is responsive (%)20.5Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of government services (%)92Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of healthcare services (%)92Ranked 1st· 2021
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of primary education services (%)89Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Proportion of population who say that overall they are satisfied with the quality of secondary education services (%)91Ranked 1st· 2021
- Proportion of the population who have experienced a dispute in the past two years who accessed a formal or informal dispute resolution mechanism (%)93.4Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportions of positions in the judiciary compared to national distributions (ratio) - All age ranges or no breaks by age - No breakdown by disability - TOTAL - Female - JUDGES0.41Ranked 26th▼ 23· 2023
- Public sector corruption index0.52Ranked 81st▲ 3· 2025
- Public Sector Corruption Index0.06Ranked 120th▲ 2· 1948
- Recent electoral turnover0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Regime0Ranked 4th—· 2024
- Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-0.47Ranked 130th▲ 12· 2024
- Regulatory Quality - Governance score (0-100)47.5Ranked 130th▲ 12· 2024
- Respect for counterarguments-0.76Ranked 79th▼ 1· 1948
- Rigorous and impartial public administration-0.03Ranked 77th▼ 2· 1948
- Rule of Law - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-0.99Ranked 163rd▲ 5· 2024
- Rule of Law - Governance score (0-100)39.9Ranked 163rd▲ 5· 2024
- Rule of law index0.41Ranked 92nd▼ 3· 2025
- Share of deaths that are registered77.6%Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2019
- Share of firms reporting corruption as a major constraint43.4%Ranked 8th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of firms that were asked to pay a bribe1.1%Ranked 38th▲ 20· 2023
- Share of people who recently paid a bribe or were asked for one17%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2019
- Share of people who said they were recently asked for a bribe or paid one17%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2019
- Share of people who said they were recently asked for a bribe or paid one17%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2019
- Share of population in poverty ($10 a day)39.4%Ranked 39th▼ 18· 2023
- Spouses have equal rights to manage their own and joint assets1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100)74.4Ranked 80th▲ 3· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Overall score (scale 0-100)74.4Ranked 80th▲ 3· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 1 data use score (scale 0-100)70Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100)92.3Ranked 37th▲ 10· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)71.5Ranked 109th▼ 43· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)73.2Ranked 51st▼ 15· 2024
- Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)65Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2024
- Transparent laws with predictable enforcement0Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Universal right to vote0Ranked 3rd—· 1947
- Universal right to vote for men0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Universal right to vote for women0Ranked 2nd—· 1947
- Universal right to vote in practice0Ranked 3rd—· 1947
- Unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population (%)47.7Ranked 25th▼ 13· 2024
- VAP turnout, parliamentary57.7%Ranked 28th▲ 11· 2006
- VAP turnout, presidential46%Ranked 16th▲ 10· 2005
- V-Dem v2x_api0.43Ranked 117th▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xca_academ0.35Ranked 103rd▲ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_acjst0.69Ranked 72nd▼ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_disc0.45Ranked 108th—· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_dmove0.3Ranked 136th—· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_prpty0.65Ranked 99th▼ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xcl_slave0.79Ranked 44th▼ 6· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_cspart0.51Ranked 102nd▼ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xdl_delib0.17Ranked 138th▼ 6· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_EDcomp_thick0.3Ranked 117th—· 2025
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_cent0.84Ranked 9th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_con0.31Ranked 115th▼ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_ctag0.7Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_dmcon0.35Ranked 112th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_inco0.82Ranked 21st—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_inpt0.82Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_poed0.77Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ed_ptcon0.78Ranked 16th—· 2021
- V-Dem v2xed_ptcon0.75Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_inpt0.84Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_cent0.64Ranked 41st▲ 6· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_ctag0.61Ranked 42nd▼ 2· 2021
- V-Dem v2xedvd_me_inco0.63Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2021
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqaccess0.31Ranked 134th▼ 10· 2025
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqdr0.6Ranked 78th▲ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2xeg_eqprotec0.8Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2xel_locelec0.82Ranked 62nd▼ 4· 2025
- V-Dem v2xel_regelec0Ranked 122nd▲ 2· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_freexp0.4Ranked 117th▼ 9· 2025
- V-Dem v2xme_altinf0.27Ranked 126th▲ 9· 2025
- V-Dem v2x_mpi0Ranked 125th▼ 1· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_client0.35Ranked 46th▼ 7· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_pres0.62Ranked 55th▲ 3· 2025
- V-Dem v2xnp_regcorr0.59Ranked 96th▲ 7· 2025
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlecon0.42Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2022
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlgender0.56Ranked 124th▼ 10· 2022
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlgeo0.33Ranked 73rd▲ 5· 2022
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlpol0.61Ranked 112th▼ 7· 2022
- V-Dem v2xpe_exlsocgr0.59Ranked 116th▲ 1· 2022
- V-Dem v2xps_party0.86Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2007
- Vertical accountability index-0.66Ranked 154th▲ 7· 2025
- Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)-1.3Ranked 177th▲ 11· 2024
- Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)33.3Ranked 177th▲ 11· 2024
- Voter turnout, parliamentary77.7%Ranked 10th▼ 11· 2006
- Voter turnout, presidential45.6%Ranked 19th▲ 4· 2005
- Women and men have the same rights to own property1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women civil liberties index0.6Ranked 100th▲ 5· 2025
- Women civil society participation index0.65Ranked 95th▼ 5· 2025
- Women have the same rights to remarry as men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Women political empowerment index0.47Ranked 131st—· 2025
- Women political participation index0.16Ranked 117th▲ 1· 2025
- Women's civil rights index0.55Ranked 37th▲ 1· 1948
- Women's civil society participation index0.1Ranked 99th▲ 3· 1948
- Women's political empowerment index0.25Ranked 71st▼ 1· 1948
- Women's political empowerment index0.25Ranked 71st▼ 1· 1948
- Women's political participation index0.07Ranked 116th▲ 1· 1948
Economy
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2090UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2090Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2090
GDP
- GDP17.17BRanked 136th▼ 2· 2025
- GDP per capita, PPP4,272.5Ranked 153rd▼ 9· 2025
- GDP growth4.3%Ranked 64th▼ 136· 2025
- Inflation9.8%Ranked 149th▼ 22· 2025
- Unemployment24.4%Ranked 181st▲ 1· 2022
- Trade openness74.8%Ranked 77th▼ 22· 2025
- FDI net inflows1.9%Ranked 48th▼ 95· 2025
- Current account balance-15.8%Ranked 89th▼ 69· 2025
- Gross savings9.2%Ranked 70th▼ 69· 2025
- Gross capital formation25.6%Ranked 45th▼ 32· 2025
- Government expenditure26.2%Ranked 68th▼ 2· 2021
- Personal remittances received4%Ranked 30th▼ 21· 2025
- R&D expenditure0.45%Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2013
- Researchers in R&D584.4Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2013
- High-technology exports1.8%Ranked 126th▼ 9· 2023
- Youth unemployment36.1%Ranked 173rd▼ 5· 2022
- Agricultural employment6.3%Ranked 125th—· 2022
- Vulnerable employment18.4%Ranked 63rd▼ 8· 2022
- Agriculture value added5.5%Ranked 102nd▼ 4· 2024
- Industry value added16.3%Ranked 151st▼ 4· 2024
- GDP per capita (nominal)3,171.1Ranked 136th▼ 12· 2025
- GNI per capita (PPP)6,547.1Ranked 138th▲ 7· 2023
- 2.5Ranked 103rd▲ 3· 2023
- 10.4.1 - Labour share of GDP (%) - SL_EMP_GTOTL45%Ranked 86th▲ 2· 2020
- 10.b.1 - Total assistance for development, by recipient countries (millions of current United States dollars) - DC_TRF_TOTL2.2BRanked 38th▼ 3· 2021
- 8.2.1 - Annual growth rate of real GDP per employed person (%) - SL_EMP_PCAP-4.8%Ranked 157th▲ 15· 2022
- 8.3.1 - Proportion of informal employment, by sector and sex - 13th ICLS (%) - SL_ISV_IFEM - No breakdown - Male55.5%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2022
- 8.8.1 - Fatal occupational injuries among employees, by sex and migrant status (per 100,000 employees) - SL_EMP_FTLINJUR - No breakdown - Both sexes1Ranked 43rd▲ 42· 2020
- 8.8.1 - Non-fatal occupational injuries among employees, by sex and migrant status (per 100,000 employees) - SL_EMP_INJUR - No breakdown - Both sexes74Ranked 46th▲ 24· 2020
- 9.2.2 - Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment - 13th ICLS (%) - SL_TLF_MANF12.4%Ranked 43rd▼ 2· 2022
- Adequacy of social insurance programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)20.8Ranked 31st· 2016
- Adequacy of social protection and labor programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)8.7Ranked 31st▲ 14· 2016
- Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)4.1Ranked 27th▲ 25· 2016
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (current US$)148.92MRanked 142nd▼ 1· 2021
- Adjusted savings: carbon dioxide damage (% of GNI)0.69Ranked 152nd▼ 3· 2021
- Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (current US$)1.97BRanked 118th▼ 5· 2021
- Adjusted savings: consumption of fixed capital (% of GNI)9.2Ranked 134th▼ 2· 2021
- Adjusted savings: education expenditure (current US$)874.12MRanked 103rd▼ 4· 2021
- Adjusted savings: education expenditure (% of GNI)4.1Ranked 92nd—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion (current US$)0Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2021
- Adjusted savings: energy depletion (% of GNI)0Ranked 128th▼ 5· 2021
- Adjusted savings: gross savings (% of GNI)15.9Ranked 106th▼ 34· 2021
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (current US$)0Ranked 94th▲ 2· 2021
- Adjusted savings: mineral depletion (% of GNI)0Ranked 88th—· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net national savings (current US$)1.45BRanked 91st▼ 29· 2021
- Adjusted savings: net national savings (% of GNI)6.8Ranked 79th▼ 51· 2021
- Affordability of cigarettes (as a share of GDP per capita)18.6%Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- After tax0.34%Ranked 20th· 2017
- Age 15-2436.1%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2022
- Age 65+1,672Ranked 166th▼ 3· 2022
- Aged 15-2410.9%Ranked 174th▼ 4· 2022
- Aged 15-2430.8%Ranked 137th▼ 7· 2022
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (annual % growth)7Ranked 28th▼ 147· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant 2015 US$)622.8MRanked 126th▼ 10· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (constant LCU)622.8MRanked 142nd▼ 14· 2025
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current LCU)884.2MRanked 154th▼ 2· 2024
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$)884.2MRanked 130th▲ 1· 2024
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)14,072.1Ranked 60th▲ 5· 2022
- Aid from governments4.2BRanked 6th▼ 2· 2024
- Aid received as grants4.22BRanked 4th▼ 1· 2024
- Amount of tracked exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)67.68MRanked 102nd▼ 3· 2023
- Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)296.58MRanked 115th—· 2023
- Amount of tracked re-exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)12.66MRanked 30th▲ 3· 2014
- Amount of United States dollars committed to public-private partnerships for infrastructure, million USD nominal0Ranked 44th▼ 18· 2020
- Amount of United States dollars committed to public-private partnerships for infrastructure, million USD real0Ranked 62nd▲ 14· 2019
- Amount of United States dollars committed to public-private partnerships for infrastructure, million USD real0Ranked 61st▲ 14· 2019
- Annual broad money growth (%)6.8%Ranked 64th▼ 51· 2023
- Annual broad money growth (%)7.1Ranked 50th▼ 15· 2024
- Annual GDP growth (%)-26.6Ranked 193rd▼ 5· 2024
- Annual GDP growth (%)-5.4%Ranked 165th▲ 70· 2023
- Annual growth of exports of goods and services (%)-11.1Ranked 140th▲ 6· 2024
- Annual growth of households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (%)-32.5Ranked 118th▼ 37· 2024
- Annual growth of imports of goods and services (%)-31.1Ranked 147th▲ 26· 2024
- Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%)-25Ranked 118th▼ 30· 2024
- Annual growth of the general government final consumption expenditure (%)-7%Ranked 130th▼ 15· 2023
- Annual growth of the gross capital formation (%)-30Ranked 143rd▲ 44· 2024
- Annual growth of the gross capital formation (%)-3.1%Ranked 88th▲ 49· 2023
- Annual growth rate of real GDP per capita (%)-24.1Ranked 95th▲ 5· 2024
- Annual inflation, consumer prices (%)53.7Ranked 168th▲ 79· 2024
- Annual rate of deaths from all disasters excluding extreme temperatures0.09Ranked 53rd▲ 5· 2015
- Annual rate of people affected by all disasters excluding extreme temperatures686.7Ranked 51st▲ 25· 2015
- Arrivals of same-day visitors from abroad830,000Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2020
- Arrivals of same-day visitors from abroad per 1,000 people163.7Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2020
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad170,000Ranked 117th▲ 17· 2020
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes1.06MRanked 46th▼ 3· 2000
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad for personal purposes1.06MRanked 46th▼ 3· 2000
- Arrivals of tourists from abroad per 1,000 people33.5Ranked 124th▲ 10· 2020
- Automated teller machines (ATMs) (per 100,000 adults)23.9Ranked 114th▼ 5· 2024
- Automated teller machines (ATMs) (per 100,000 adults)23.9Ranked 115th▼ 5· 2024
- Average hourly earnings of care employees by sex (local currency)22.9Ranked 15th▼ 13· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by ILO sector and sex (local currency)19.8Ranked 16th▼ 15· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and disability status (local currency)19.9Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2022
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)19.8Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)19.8Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)19.8Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex and occupation (local currency)19.8Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)19.8Ranked 20th▼ 16· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of public sector employees (local currency)21.6Ranked 19th▼ 17· 2025
- Average hourly earnings of STEM employees (local currency)21.5Ranked 16th▼ 15· 2025
- Average length of stay in hotels and similar establishments2.3Ranked 20th▲ 9· 2024
- Average monthly earnings of care employees by sex (local currency)3,079.7Ranked 16th▼ 13· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by ILO sector and sex (local currency)3,195.1Ranked 16th▼ 15· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and disability status (local currency)3,067.5Ranked 39th▲ 7· 2022
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)3,195.1Ranked 19th▼ 26· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)3,195.1Ranked 19th▼ 26· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)3,195.1Ranked 19th▼ 26· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex and occupation (local currency)3,195.1Ranked 19th▼ 26· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)3,195.1Ranked 20th▼ 26· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of public sector employees (local currency)3,243.4Ranked 18th▼ 18· 2025
- Average monthly earnings of STEM employees (local currency)3,570.5Ranked 16th▼ 15· 2025
- Average time to clear exports through customs (days)5.2Ranked 19th▲ 9· 2023
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by economic activity and occupation41.9Ranked 12th▼ 15· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by ILO sector and sex41.9Ranked 13th▼ 10· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex41.9Ranked 14th▼ 14· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and economic activity41.9Ranked 13th▼ 14· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 241.9Ranked 13th▼ 11· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and establishment size41.9Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and occupation41.9Ranked 13th▼ 15· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and occupation - ISCO level 241.9Ranked 13th▼ 12· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex and public/private sector41.9Ranked 13th▼ 14· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and disability status41.5Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and education41.9Ranked 13th▼ 13· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and establishment size41.9Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and marital status41.9Ranked 13th▼ 13· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, economic activity and public/private sector41.9Ranked 12th▼ 14· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, establishment size and disability status41.5Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, establishment size and marital status41.9Ranked 13th▼ 9· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202539.7Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and disability status41.5Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and education41.9Ranked 13th▼ 14· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and establishment size41.9Ranked 12th▼ 10· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and marital status41.9Ranked 13th▼ 14· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, occupation and public/private sector41.9Ranked 12th▼ 15· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, public/private sector and disability status41.5Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employed person by sex, public/private sector and marital status41.9Ranked 13th▼ 13· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by economic activity and occupation41.5Ranked 15th▼ 19· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex41.5Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and disability status41Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and economic activity41.5Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 241.5Ranked 15th▼ 15· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and education41.5Ranked 16th▼ 17· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and establishment size41.5Ranked 16th▼ 11· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and marital status41.5Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and occupation41.5Ranked 16th▼ 19· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and occupation - ISCO level 241.5Ranked 15th▼ 16· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex and public/private sector41.5Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and disability status41Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and education41.5Ranked 15th▼ 17· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and establishment size41.5Ranked 15th▼ 11· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and marital status41.5Ranked 15th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, economic activity and public/private sector41.5Ranked 15th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, establishment size and disability status41Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, establishment size and marital status41.5Ranked 15th▼ 12· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and disability status41Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and education41.5Ranked 15th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and establishment size41.5Ranked 15th▼ 12· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and marital status41.5Ranked 15th▼ 19· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, occupation and public/private sector41.5Ranked 15th▼ 19· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, public/private sector and disability status41Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee by sex, public/private sector and marital status41.5Ranked 15th▼ 18· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in a STEM occupation39.9Ranked 16th▼ 16· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in care employment by sex31.3Ranked 21st▼ 24· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per employee in the public sector38Ranked 16th▼ 21· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in care employment by sex31.8Ranked 21st▼ 24· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in in a STEM occupation40.1Ranked 15th▼ 15· 2025
- Average weekly hours actually worked per person in the public sector38Ranked 16th▼ 22· 2025
- Average weekly hours usually worked per employed person by sex43.2Ranked 22nd· 2015
- Average weekly hours usually worked per employee by sex43Ranked 29th· 2015
- Bank capital to assets ratio (%)8Ranked 86th▼ 3· 2021
- Bank capital to assets ratio (%)8.5Ranked 71st—· 2023
- Bank capital to assets ratio (%)8.1%Ranked 64th▼ 13· 2022
- Bank liquid reserves to bank assets ratio (%)11Ranked 68th▼ 18· 2025
- Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%)3.4Ranked 71st▼ 2· 2023
- Benefit incidence of social insurance programs to poorest quintile (% of total social insurance benefits)2.1Ranked 17th· 2016
- Benefit incidence of social protection and labor programs to poorest quintile (% of total SPL benefits)6.5Ranked 25th▲ 22· 2016
- Benefit incidence of social safety net programs to poorest quintile (% of total safety net benefits)14.8Ranked 32nd▲ 14· 2016
- Borrowed from family or friends33.9%Ranked 31st▼ 51· 2021
- Borrowed to start, operate, or expand a farm or business, female (% age 15+)0.8%Ranked 138th▲ 31· 2017
- Borrowers from commercial banks (per 1,000 adults)166.5Ranked 54th▲ 6· 2024
- B-READY: Business Entry: Overall Score62.5Ranked 34th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Entry Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations for Business Entry85Ranked 21st· 2024
- B-READY: Business Entry Pillar 2: Digital Public Services and Transparency of Information for Business Entry40.9Ranked 34th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Entry Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency of Business Entry61.5Ranked 24th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Insolvency: Overall Score12Ranked 48th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Insolvency Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations for Judicial Insolvency Proceedings31Ranked 42nd· 2024
- B-READY: Business Insolvency Pillar 2: Quality of Institutional and Operational Infrastructure for Judicial Insolvency Proceedings5Ranked 34th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Insolvency Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency of Resolving Judicial Insolvency Proceedings0Ranked 41st· 2024
- B-READY: Business Location: Overall Score55Ranked 36th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Location Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations for Business Location45.5Ranked 46th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Location Pillar 2: Quality of Public Services and Transparency of Information for Business Location27.2Ranked 38th· 2024
- B-READY: Business Location Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency of Establishing a Business Location92.5Ranked 6th· 2024
- B-READY: Dispute Resolution: Overall Score36.5Ranked 49th· 2024
- B-READY: Dispute Resolution Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations for Dispute Resolution52.8Ranked 45th· 2024
- B-READY: Dispute Resolution Pillar 2: Public Services for Dispute Resolution35.2Ranked 37th· 2024
- B-READY: Dispute Resolution Pillar 3: Ease of Resolving a Commercial Dispute21.6Ranked 50th· 2024
- B-READY: Financial Services: Overall Score44.6Ranked 42nd· 2024
- B-READY: Financial Services Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations for Financial Services59Ranked 43rd· 2024
- B-READY: Financial Services Pillar 2: Accessibility of Information in Credit Infrastructure33.6Ranked 38th· 2024
- B-READY: Financial Services Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency of Receiving Financial Services41.2Ranked 42nd· 2024
- B-READY: International Trade: Overall Score48.9Ranked 42nd· 2024
- B-READY: International Trade Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations for International Trade55.4Ranked 41st· 2024
- B-READY: International Trade Pillar 2: Quality of Public Services for the Facilitation of International Trade19.2Ranked 48th· 2024
- B-READY: International Trade Pillar 3: Efficiency of Importing Goods, Exporting Goods, and Engaging in Digital Trade72.1Ranked 26th· 2024
- B-READY: Labor: Overall Score53.1Ranked 47th· 2024
- B-READY: Labor Pillar 1: Quality of Labor Regulations63.7Ranked 38th· 2024
- B-READY: Labor Pillar 2: Adequacy of Public Services for Labor32.7Ranked 32nd· 2024
- B-READY: Labor Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency of Labor Regulations and Public Services in Practice63Ranked 29th· 2024
- B-READY: Market Competition: Overall Score25.3Ranked 47th· 2024
- B-READY: Market Competition Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations that Promote Market Competition30.4Ranked 47th· 2024
- B-READY: Market Competition Pillar 2: Public Services that Promote Market Competition14.3Ranked 44th· 2024
- B-READY: Market Competition Pillar 3: Implementation of Key Services Promoting Market Competition31.2Ranked 44th· 2024
- B-READY: Pillar 1: Regulatory Framework47.5Ranked 49th· 2024
- B-READY: Pillar 2: Public Services28.4Ranked 45th· 2024
- B-READY: Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency52.8Ranked 41st· 2024
- B-READY: Taxation: Overall Score33.1Ranked 48th· 2024
- B-READY: Taxation Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations on Taxation0Ranked 48th· 2024
- B-READY: Taxation Pillar 2: Public Services Provided by the Tax Administration32.3Ranked 42nd· 2024
- B-READY: Taxation Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency of Tax Systems in Practice67Ranked 24th· 2024
- B-READY: Utility Services: Overall Score57.8Ranked 40th· 2024
- B-READY: Utility Services Pillar 1: Quality of Regulations on Utility Services51.9Ranked 43rd· 2024
- B-READY: Utility Services Pillar 2: Quality of Governance and Transparency of Utility Services43.9Ranked 42nd· 2024
- B-READY: Utility Services Pillar 3: Operational Efficiency of Utility Service Provision77.5Ranked 18th· 2024
- Bribery incidence (% of firms experiencing at least one bribe payment request)1.1Ranked 40th▲ 22· 2023
- Broad money (current LCU)17.68BRanked 99th▼ 7· 2024
- Broad money growth (annual %)7.1Ranked 69th▲ 2· 2024
- Broad money (% of GDP)110.4Ranked 16th▼ 10· 2024
- Broad money to total reserves ratio13.3Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2024
- Broad money to total reserves ratio13.3Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2024
- Broad money to total reserves ratio12.5Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2023
- Carbon intensity176.8Ranked 143rd—· 2024
- Care employees by sex and public/private sector (thousands)107Ranked 23rd▼ 20· 2025
- Care employees by sex and type of contract (thousands)107Ranked 19th▼ 23· 2025
- Care employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)117.2Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Care employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)117.2Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Care employment by sex and education (thousands)117.2Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Care employment by sex and marital status (thousands)117.2Ranked 21st▼ 22· 2025
- Care employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)117.2Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Care employment by sex and occupation (thousands)117.2Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Care employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)117.2Ranked 27th▼ 23· 2025
- Care employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)117.2Ranked 25th▼ 22· 2025
- Care employment by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)117.2Ranked 24th▼ 22· 2025
- Care employment outside the formal sector by sex (thousands)5.1Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Cases of fatal occupational injury by economic activity14Ranked 45th▼ 3· 2016
- Cases of fatal occupational injury by sex and migrant status10Ranked 40th▼ 10· 2020
- Cases of non-fatal occupational injury by economic activity609Ranked 47th▼ 6· 2022
- Cases of non-fatal occupational injury by sex and migrant status609Ranked 46th—· 2022
- Cases of non-fatal occupational injury by sex, type of incapacity and migrant status643Ranked 42nd· 2015
- Cases of non-fatal occupational injury by type of incapacity and economic activity797Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2017
- ccon33,777Ranked 116th▲ 1· 2019
- cda41,750Ranked 119th▲ 1· 2019
- cgdpe30,309.8Ranked 129th—· 2019
- cgdpo37,048.2Ranked 123rd▼ 5· 2019
- Changes in inventories (constant LCU)245.9MRanked 42nd▼ 13· 2025
- Changes in inventories (current LCU)279.7MRanked 73rd▼ 20· 2025
- Changes in inventories (current US$)279.7MRanked 66th▼ 11· 2025
- Charges for the use of intellectual property, payments (BoP, current US$)644,519Ranked 136th▼ 5· 2024
- Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$)20,218.5Ranked 116th▼ 6· 2024
- Chemicals (% of value added in manufacturing)4.7Ranked 77th▼ 1· 2021
- Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money)2.5Ranked 46th▼ 4· 2025
- Claims on central government, etc. (% GDP)16.8Ranked 36th▼ 20· 2025
- Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy (annual growth as % of broad money)1.8Ranked 75th▼ 31· 2025
- Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money)1.7Ranked 71st▼ 40· 2025
- cn129,442Ranked 120th▼ 1· 2019
- Coal rents (% of GDP)0Ranked 67th▼ 1· 2021
- Coefficient of variation in calorie consumption0.37Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Commercial bank branches (per 100,000 adults)12.9Ranked 74th▲ 1· 2024
- Commercial bank branches (per 100,000 adults)12.9Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2024
- Communications, computer, etc. (% of service exports, BoP)7.9Ranked 86th▲ 78· 2025
- Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP)32.4Ranked 61st▼ 23· 2025
- Consumer price index (2010 = 100)209.6Ranked 48th▼ 8· 2025
- Consumer price index (2010 = 100)209.6Ranked 48th▼ 8· 2025
- Contraceptive prevalence42.8%Ranked 8th▼ 13· 2020
- Contributing family workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)7.7Ranked 73rd▲ 7· 2022
- Contributing family workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)2.9Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2022
- Contributing family workers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)3.7Ranked 89th▲ 7· 2022
- cor_exp0.47Ranked 113th▲ 4· 2017
- Countries that have conducted at least one population and housing census in the last 10 years (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st· 2017
- Countries with birth registration data that are at least 90 percent complete (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Countries with death registration data that are at least 75 percent complete (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Countries with national statistical legislation exists that complies with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans that are fully funded (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans that are under implementation (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans with funding from donors (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with national statistical plans with funding from Government (1 = YES; 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Criminal sanctions or compensation for sexual harassment in employment0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- csh_c0.72Ranked 51st▲ 25· 2019
- csh_g0.19Ranked 97th▲ 51· 2019
- csh_i0.22Ranked 94th▲ 24· 2019
- csh_m-0.49Ranked 136th▲ 53· 2019
- csh_r0.27Ranked 11th▼ 145· 2019
- csh_x0.09Ranked 134th▼ 20· 2019
- Current account balance as a proportion of GDP (%)-16.6%Ranked 144th▲ 3· 2023
- Current account balance as a proportion of GDP (%)-21.1Ranked 150th▼ 13· 2024
- Current account balance (BoP, current US$)-2.72BRanked 71st▼ 63· 2025
- Data Infrastructure performance index (Statistical Performance Indicators Pillar 5) (Index)65Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2024
- Data Sources performance index (Statistical Performance Indicators Pillar 4) (Index)73.2Ranked 51st▼ 15· 2024
- Days lost due to cases of occupational injury with temporary incapacity for work by economic activity664Ranked 49th· 2015
- Days lost due to cases of occupational injury with temporary incapacity for work by sex and migrant status664Ranked 43rd· 2015
- Days not worked due to strikes and lockouts by economic activity83Ranked 34th· 2013
- DEC alternative conversion factor (in local currency unit per United States dollar)1Ranked 133rd▼ 2· 2024
- DEC alternative conversion factor (LCU per US$)1Ranked 132nd▼ 1· 2025
- delta0.03Ranked 160th▲ 2· 2019
- Deposit interest rate (%)2.2Ranked 52nd▼ 6· 2021
- Depositors with commercial banks (per 1,000 adults)800.4Ranked 50th▼ 3· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise exports (%)0.01Ranked 150th—· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise imports (%)0.03Ranked 131st▲ 10· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services exports (%)0.01Ranked 143rd▲ 3· 2024
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services imports (%)0.02Ranked 128th▲ 2· 2024
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters relative to GDP (%)0.01%Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2018
- Discouraged jobseekers by sex and disability status (thousands)55.5Ranked 19th▲ 9· 2022
- Discouraged jobseekers by sex and education (thousands)15.2Ranked 25th▼ 26· 2025
- Discouraged jobseekers by sex and marital status (thousands)15.2Ranked 22nd▼ 18· 2025
- Discouraged jobseekers by sex, education and marital status (thousands)15.2Ranked 21st▼ 18· 2025
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (constant LCU)-118.6MRanked 65th▼ 23· 2025
- Discrepancy in expenditure estimate of GDP (current LCU)-161.8MRanked 68th▼ 13· 2025
- Dollar value of all resources made available to strengthen statistical capacity in developing countries (current United States dollars)1.58MRanked 73rd▼ 2· 2023
- Domestic credit to private sector by banks (% of GDP)56.4Ranked 30th▼ 15· 2025
- Domestic credit to private sector (% of GDP)56.5Ranked 29th▼ 21· 2025
- Domestic material consumption per unit of GDP, by type of raw material (kilograms per constant 2015 United States dollars) - Total or no breakdown2Ranked 72nd▼ 17· 2023
- emp1Ranked 132nd—· 2019
- Employees76.2%Ranked 65th▼ 14· 2022
- Employees by economic activity and occupation (thousands)474.5Ranked 57th▼ 25· 2025
- Employees by ILO sector and sex and type of job contract (thousands)474.5Ranked 20th▼ 22· 2025
- Employees by sex and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 49th▲ 5· 2022
- Employees by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)474.5Ranked 50th▼ 21· 2025
- Employees by sex and economic activity (thousands)474.5Ranked 60th▼ 25· 2025
- Employees by sex and education (thousands)474.5Ranked 38th▼ 43· 2025
- Employees by sex and establishment size (thousands)474.5Ranked 24th▼ 18· 2025
- Employees by sex and marital status (thousands)474.5Ranked 32nd▼ 25· 2025
- Employees by sex and multiple-job holding (thousands)474.5Ranked 36th▼ 43· 2025
- Employees by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)474.5Ranked 32nd▼ 41· 2025
- Employees by sex and occupation (thousands)474.5Ranked 58th▼ 25· 2025
- Employees by sex and public/private sector (thousands)474.5Ranked 31st▼ 23· 2025
- Employees by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)474.5Ranked 56th▼ 24· 2025
- Employees by sex, economic activity and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 49th▲ 5· 2022
- Employees by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)474.5Ranked 37th▼ 43· 2025
- Employees by sex, economic activity and establishment size (thousands)474.5Ranked 23rd▼ 18· 2025
- Employees by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)474.5Ranked 31st▼ 25· 2025
- Employees by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)474.5Ranked 30th▼ 23· 2025
- Employees by sex, education and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 47th▲ 3· 2022
- Employees by sex, education and marital status (thousands)474.5Ranked 31st▼ 25· 2025
- Employees by sex, establishment size and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2022
- Employees by sex, establishment size and marital status (thousands)474.5Ranked 21st▼ 16· 2025
- Employees by sex, informal/formal job and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 20th▲ 8· 2022
- Employees by sex, informal/formal job and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)474.5Ranked 18th▼ 18· 2025
- Employees by sex, informal/formal job and economic activity (thousands)474.5Ranked 23rd▼ 19· 2025
- Employees by sex, informal/formal job and education (thousands)474.5Ranked 23rd▼ 19· 2025
- Employees by sex, informal/formal job and marital status (thousands)474.5Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Employees by sex, informal/formal job and occupation (thousands)474.5Ranked 24th▼ 19· 2025
- Employees by sex, informal/formal job and public/private sector (thousands)474.5Ranked 21st▼ 19· 2025
- Employees by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 49th▲ 5· 2022
- Employees by sex, occupation and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 49th▲ 5· 2022
- Employees by sex, occupation and education (thousands)474.5Ranked 37th▼ 43· 2025
- Employees by sex, occupation and establishment size (thousands)474.5Ranked 24th▼ 18· 2025
- Employees by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)474.5Ranked 31st▼ 25· 2025
- Employees by sex, occupation and public/private sector (thousands)474.5Ranked 30th▼ 23· 2025
- Employees by sex, public/private sector and disability status (thousands)865.3Ranked 24th▲ 7· 2022
- Employees by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)474.5Ranked 27th▼ 21· 2025
- Employees in STEM occupations by sex and public/private sector (thousands)37Ranked 24th▼ 18· 2025
- Employees in STEM occupations by sex and type of job contract (thousands)37Ranked 20th▼ 22· 2025
- Employers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)2Ranked 85th▲ 8· 2022
- Employers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)6.1Ranked 44th▲ 9· 2022
- Employers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)5.4Ranked 32nd▲ 10· 2022
- Employment by economic activity and occupation (thousands)719.9Ranked 55th▼ 28· 2025
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 24th▲ 6· 2022
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 24· 2025
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and institutional sector (thousands)719.9Ranked 23rd▼ 21· 2025
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and occupation (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 24· 2025
- Employment by ILO sector and sex and status in employment (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 24· 2025
- Employment by ILO sector and sex (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 24· 2025
- Employment by ILO sector, sex and establishment size (thousands)719.9Ranked 17th▼ 17· 2025
- Employment by sex and care worker type (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 24· 2025
- Employment by sex and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 55th▲ 9· 2022
- Employment by sex and economic activity -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)1,106Ranked 140th▼ 1· 2022
- Employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)719.9Ranked 48th▼ 24· 2025
- Employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)719.9Ranked 60th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment by sex and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 56th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment by sex and establishment size (thousands)719.9Ranked 23rd▼ 20· 2025
- Employment by sex and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 31st▼ 43· 2025
- Employment by sex and multiple-job holding (thousands)719.9Ranked 35th▼ 45· 2025
- Employment by sex and occupation -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)1,106Ranked 140th▼ 1· 2022
- Employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)719.9Ranked 31st▼ 43· 2025
- Employment by sex and occupation (thousands)719.9Ranked 57th▼ 28· 2025
- Employment by sex and public/private sector (thousands)719.9Ranked 30th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex and status in employment -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)1,106Ranked 140th▼ 1· 2022
- Employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)719.9Ranked 60th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)719.9Ranked 54th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and citizenship (thousands)1,034.4Ranked 50th▲ 6· 2021
- Employment by sex, economic activity and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 55th▲ 9· 2022
- Employment by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 36th▼ 46· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and establishment size (thousands)719.9Ranked 22nd▼ 20· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 30th▼ 43· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and multiple job holding (thousands)719.9Ranked 34th▼ 45· 2025
- Employment by sex, economic activity and place of birth (thousands)1,034.4Ranked 57th· 2021
- Employment by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)719.9Ranked 29th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 30th▲ 11· 2022
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and economic activity (thousands)719.9Ranked 26th▼ 51· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 26th▼ 52· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 21st▼ 30· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and nature of job (informal / formal) (thousands)719.9Ranked 18th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - normative approach and status in employment (thousands)719.9Ranked 26th▼ 52· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 24th▲ 8· 2022
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and economic activity (thousands)719.9Ranked 23rd▼ 47· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 18th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and nature of job (informal / formal) (thousands)719.9Ranked 16th▼ 23· 2025
- Employment by sex, educational mismatch - statistical approach and status in employment (thousands)719.9Ranked 23rd▼ 48· 2025
- Employment by sex, education and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 53rd▲ 7· 2022
- Employment by sex, education and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 30th▼ 42· 2025
- Employment by sex, establishment size and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 16th▲ 5· 2022
- Employment by sex, establishment size and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)719.9Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Employment by sex, establishment size and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 45th▲ 10· 2022
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)719.9Ranked 17th▼ 20· 2025
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and economic activity (thousands)719.9Ranked 22nd▼ 43· 2025
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 22nd▼ 22· 2025
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 19th▼ 43· 2025
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and occupation (thousands)719.9Ranked 23rd▼ 22· 2025
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and public/private sector (thousands)719.9Ranked 20th▼ 21· 2025
- Employment by sex, informal/formal job and working time arrangement (thousands)719.9Ranked 20th▼ 21· 2025
- Employment by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 55th▲ 9· 2022
- Employment by sex, multiple job holding and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 54th▲ 10· 2022
- Employment by sex, multiple job holding and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 34th▼ 44· 2025
- Employment by sex, multiple job holding and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 29th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment by sex, occupation and citizenship (thousands)1,034.4Ranked 47th· 2021
- Employment by sex, occupation and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 54th▲ 9· 2022
- Employment by sex, occupation and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex, occupation and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 36th▼ 45· 2025
- Employment by sex, occupation and establishment size (thousands)719.9Ranked 23rd▼ 20· 2025
- Employment by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 30th▼ 43· 2025
- Employment by sex, occupation and multiple job holding (thousands)719.9Ranked 34th▼ 45· 2025
- Employment by sex, occupation and place of birth (thousands)1,034.4Ranked 55th· 2021
- Employment by sex, occupation and public/private sector (thousands)719.9Ranked 29th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex, public/private sector and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 29th▲ 9· 2022
- Employment by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 26th▼ 23· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and citizenship (thousands)1,034.4Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2021
- Employment by sex, status in employment and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 54th▲ 8· 2022
- Employment by sex, status in employment and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)719.9Ranked 27th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and economic activity (thousands)719.9Ranked 56th▼ 28· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 37th▼ 45· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and establishment size (thousands)719.9Ranked 23rd▼ 20· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 31st▼ 27· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and multiple job holding (thousands)719.9Ranked 35th▼ 45· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and occupation (thousands)719.9Ranked 56th▼ 28· 2025
- Employment by sex, status in employment and place of birth (thousands)1,034.4Ranked 57th· 2021
- Employment by sex, status in employment and public/private sector (thousands)719.9Ranked 30th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment by sex, weekly hours actually worked and disability status (thousands)1,136Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2022
- Employment by sex, weekly hours actually worked and education (thousands)719.9Ranked 33rd▼ 45· 2025
- Employment by sex, weekly hours actually worked and marital status (thousands)719.9Ranked 28th▼ 26· 2025
- Employment discrimination based on gender prohibited1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Employment in agriculture, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)6.3Ranked 109th▲ 2· 2022
- Employment in agriculture, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)6.4Ranked 134th▼ 4· 2022
- Employment in industry29.9%Ranked 22nd—· 2022
- Employment in industry, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)10.9Ranked 81st▼ 41· 2022
- Employment in industry, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)33.8Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2022
- Employment in industry (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)29.9Ranked 22nd—· 2022
- Employment in services, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)82.9Ranked 65th▲ 7· 2022
- Employment in services, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)59.9Ranked 58th▲ 2· 2022
- Employment in services (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)63.8Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2022
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)45.6Ranked 28th▼ 22· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and economic activity (thousands)45.6Ranked 28th▼ 22· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and education (thousands)45.6Ranked 28th▼ 22· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and marital status (thousands)45.6Ranked 22nd▼ 20· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)45.6Ranked 28th▼ 22· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and occupation (thousands)45.6Ranked 28th▼ 22· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and status in employment (thousands)45.6Ranked 28th▼ 22· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)45.6Ranked 26th▼ 21· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)45.6Ranked 25th▼ 21· 2025
- Employment in STEM occupations outside the formal sector (thousands)2.3Ranked 17th▼ 17· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by economic activity and occupation (thousands)207.1Ranked 22nd▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and disability status (thousands)350.1Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2022
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)207.1Ranked 18th▼ 18· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and economic activity (thousands)207.1Ranked 22nd▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and education (thousands)207.1Ranked 22nd▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and establishment size (thousands)207.1Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and marital status (thousands)207.1Ranked 20th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)207.1Ranked 20th▼ 25· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and occupation (thousands)207.1Ranked 23rd▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and public/private sector (thousands)207.1Ranked 21st▼ 19· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and status in employment (thousands)207.1Ranked 23rd▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)207.1Ranked 23rd▼ 18· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and disability status (thousands)350.1Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2022
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)207.1Ranked 21st▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and establishment size (thousands)207.1Ranked 18th▼ 16· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)207.1Ranked 19th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)207.1Ranked 20th▼ 19· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, education and disability status (thousands)350.1Ranked 32nd▲ 8· 2022
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, education and marital status (thousands)207.1Ranked 19th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, establishment size and disability status (thousands)350.1Ranked 17th▲ 5· 2022
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, establishment size and marital status (thousands)207.1Ranked 17th▼ 15· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)350.1Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2022
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and disability status (thousands)350.1Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2022
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and education (thousands)207.1Ranked 22nd▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and establishment size (thousands)207.1Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)207.1Ranked 20th▼ 27· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and public/private sector (thousands)207.1Ranked 21st▼ 19· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, public/private sector and disability status (thousands)350.1Ranked 26th▲ 11· 2022
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)207.1Ranked 18th▼ 19· 2025
- Employment outside the formal sector by sex (thousands)207.1Ranked 23rd▼ 27· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)11.4Ranked 179th▼ 5· 2022
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%) (national estimate)12.8Ranked 69th▼ 34· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)57.6Ranked 147th▼ 8· 2022
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%) (national estimate)51.5Ranked 67th▼ 32· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)34Ranked 178th▼ 3· 2022
- Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%) (national estimate)32.5Ranked 68th▼ 35· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)4.7Ranked 179th▼ 4· 2022
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, female (%) (national estimate)5.3Ranked 70th▼ 34· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)35Ranked 108th▼ 19· 2022
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, male (%) (national estimate)32.3Ranked 46th▼ 23· 2025
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)19.7Ranked 163rd▼ 7· 2022
- Employment to population ratio, ages 15-24, total (%) (national estimate)19Ranked 66th▼ 30· 2025
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex and disability status (%)34Ranked 65th▲ 7· 2022
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex and education (%)32.5Ranked 68th▼ 30· 2025
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex and marital status (%)32.5Ranked 36th▼ 31· 2025
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex, education and disability status (%)34Ranked 63rd▲ 5· 2022
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex, education and marital status (%)32.5Ranked 35th▼ 31· 2025
- Employment-to-population ratio by sex, marital status and disability status (%)34Ranked 65th▲ 7· 2022
- Estimated maternal deaths29.6Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2020
- Expense (current LCU)4.74BRanked 117th▼ 5· 2021
- Expense (% of GDP)26.2%Ranked 68th▼ 2· 2021
- Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU)2.6BRanked 125th▼ 24· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (annual % growth)-8.3Ranked 123rd▲ 66· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$)3.62BRanked 82nd▼ 53· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)2.65BRanked 115th▼ 14· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (constant LCU)2.65BRanked 124th▼ 25· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (current LCU)3.64BRanked 132nd▼ 30· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (current US$)3.64BRanked 120th▼ 18· 2025
- Exports of goods and services (% of GDP)21.2Ranked 109th▼ 23· 2025
- Exports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$)4.8BRanked 82nd▼ 53· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (constant LCU)-3.92BRanked 61st▼ 21· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (current LCU)-5.55BRanked 71st▼ 21· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (current US$)-5.55BRanked 110th▼ 31· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (% of GDP)-32.3Ranked 131st▼ 27· 2025
- External balance on goods and services (% of GDP)-32.3%Ranked 130th▼ 27· 2025
- Family or friends33.9%Ranked 31st▼ 51· 2021
- Fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by economic activity1Ranked 43rd▲ 42· 2020
- Fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status1Ranked 31st▲ 30· 2020
- Female labor force participation rate18.9%Ranked 172nd▼ 4· 2022
- Female labor force participation rate18.9%Ranked 173rd▼ 4· 2022
- Female labor force participation rate17.8%Ranked 89th▼ 31· 2024
- Female labor force participation rate18.9%Ranked 173rd▼ 4· 2022
- Female labor force participation rate, ages 15-2412%Ranked 70th▼ 31· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate in 198018.2%Ranked 68th▼ 32· 2025
- Female share of employment in senior and middle management (%) 23.5Ranked 27th▼ 49· 2025
- Female share of low pay earners (%)23.1Ranked 23rd▼ 22· 2025
- Female unemployment rate40%Ranked 183rd▼ 3· 2022
- Final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)4.2Ranked 46th▼ 117· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)12.86BRanked 108th▼ 17· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)12.86BRanked 127th▼ 19· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)18.48BRanked 128th▼ 25· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (current US$)18.48BRanked 101st▼ 16· 2025
- Final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)107.7Ranked 5th▼ 8· 2025
- Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (constant LCU)232.2MRanked 12th—· 2003
- Financial intermediary services indirectly Measured (FISIM) (current LCU)110.7MRanked 26th▼ 1· 2003
- Firms competing against unregistered firms (% of firms)49.8Ranked 19th▲ 17· 2023
- Firms expected to give gifts in meetings with tax officials (% of firms)0.5Ranked 38th▲ 21· 2023
- Firms experiencing electrical outages (% of firms)42.2Ranked 23rd▲ 18· 2023
- Firms filling taxes electronically (% of firms)20.3Ranked 42nd· 2023
- Firms formally registered when operations started (% of firms)65.8Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2023
- Firms offering formal training (% of firms)11.5Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2023
- Firms that are fully credit constrained (% of firms)8.1Ranked 26th▲ 8· 2023
- Firms that are partially credit constrained (% of firms)10.7Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2023
- Firms that use a third party to resolve commercial disputes (% of firms)82.4Ranked 4th· 2023
- Firms using banks to finance investment (% of firms)1.4Ranked 44th▲ 6· 2023
- Firms using banks to finance working capital (% of firms) 16.4Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2023
- Firms visited or required meetings with tax officials (% of firms)44.8Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Firms where largest owner is also the top manager (% of firms)88.4Ranked 8th· 2023
- Firms with a bank loan/line of credit (% of firms)18.2Ranked 38th—· 2023
- Firms with at least 10% foreign ownership3Ranked 43rd▲ 11· 2023
- Firms with female participation in ownership (% of firms)11.8Ranked 44th▲ 5· 2023
- Firms with female top manager (% of firms)2.7Ranked 45th▲ 6· 2023
- Food, beverages and tobacco (% of value added in manufacturing)23.6Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2021
- Foreign aid received4.2BRanked 6th▼ 2· 2024
- Foreign aid received per capita763.8Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2024
- Foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows (millions of United States dollars)162Ranked 148th▲ 13· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net (BoP, current US$)-315.17MRanked 42nd▼ 14· 2025
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows, as a proportion of GDP (%)1.2Ranked 132nd▼ 17· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$)329.83MRanked 69th▼ 75· 2025
- Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP)1%Ranked 142nd▼ 8· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$)14.66MRanked 70th▼ 54· 2025
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP)0.07%Ranked 127th▼ 1· 2024
- Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP)0.09Ranked 69th▼ 59· 2025
- Foreign guests staying in hotels and similar establishments115,000Ranked 58th▲ 6· 2024
- Forest rents (% of GDP)0Ranked 177th▼ 5· 2021
- GDP37.13BRanked 132nd▲ 2· 2023
- GDP (constant 2015 US$)12.46BRanked 137th▼ 7· 2025
- GDP (constant LCU)12.46BRanked 161st▼ 8· 2025
- GDP (current LCU)17.17BRanked 162nd▼ 7· 2025
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country)137.7Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2025
- GDP deflator: linked series (base year varies by country)137.7Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2025
- GDP growth observations-22.9%Ranked 170th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP: linked series (current LCU)17.17BRanked 162nd▼ 7· 2025
- GDP per capita3,845.5Ranked 158th▲ 1· 2024
- GDP per capita2,302.1Ranked 137th▼ 12· 2025
- GDP per capita6,863.7Ranked 134th▲ 2· 2023
- GDP per capita3,845.5Ranked 158th▲ 1· 2024
- GDP per capita3,845.5Ranked 158th▲ 1· 2024
- GDP per capita2,302.1Ranked 137th▼ 12· 2025
- GDP per capita4,775.2Ranked 124th▲ 1· 2022
- GDP per capita (2011 int-$)5,270Ranked 115th▲ 2· 2017
- GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$)2,302.1Ranked 139th▼ 12· 2025
- GDP per capita (constant LCU)2,302.1Ranked 181st▼ 14· 2025
- GDP per capita (current LCU)3,171.1Ranked 184th▼ 15· 2025
- GDP per capita growth (annual %)1.9Ranked 108th▼ 92· 2025
- GDP per capita growth (annual %)1.9%Ranked 103rd▼ 95· 2025
- GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)4,999.7Ranked 153rd▼ 9· 2025
- GDP per person employed (constant 2021 PPP $)27,595.5Ranked 112th▲ 4· 2022
- GDP per person employed (constant 2021 PPP $)27,595.5Ranked 112th▲ 4· 2022
- GDP, PPP (constant 2021 international $)23.13BRanked 147th▼ 3· 2025
- GDP, PPP (current international $)27.07BRanked 147th▼ 3· 2025
- GDP price levels relative to the US0.59Ranked 57th▼ 6· 2024
- Gender Development Index0.95Ranked 67th▼ 24· 2023
- Gender wage gap by occupation (%)13.9Ranked 4th▼ 8· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)-7.7Ranked 130th▼ 31· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)2.02BRanked 103rd▼ 9· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)2.02BRanked 126th▼ 21· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (current LCU)2.93BRanked 128th▼ 26· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (current US$)2.93BRanked 103rd▼ 15· 2025
- General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)17Ranked 61st▼ 15· 2025
- Gini coefficient0.36Ranked 37th—· 2023
- Gini coefficient63.9Ranked 5th▼ 58· 2023
- Gini coefficient after tax0.6Ranked 6th▼ 56· 2023
- Gini coefficient (before tax)0.64Ranked 5th▼ 58· 2023
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex0.35Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2025
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and disability status0.44Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2022
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity0.35Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2025
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and education0.35Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2025
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and marital status0.35Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2025
- Gini index of hourly earnings of employees by sex and occupation0.35Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex0.3Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and disability status0.39Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2022
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity0.3Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and education0.3Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and marital status0.3Ranked 4th▼ 11· 2025
- Gini index of monthly earnings of employees by sex and occupation0.3Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2025
- GNI, Atlas method (current US$)17.6BRanked 131st▼ 8· 2025
- GNI (constant 2015 US$)13.25BRanked 82nd▼ 36· 2025
- GNI (constant LCU)13.25BRanked 98th▼ 40· 2025
- GNI (current LCU)18.25BRanked 158th▼ 9· 2025
- GNI (current US$)18.25BRanked 131st▼ 6· 2025
- GNI growth (annual %)5Ranked 43rd▼ 109· 2025
- GNI: linked series (current LCU)18.25BRanked 158th▼ 8· 2025
- GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$)3,250Ranked 131st▼ 11· 2025
- GNI per capita (constant 2015 US$)2,448Ranked 67th▼ 41· 2025
- GNI per capita (constant LCU)2,448Ranked 101st▼ 47· 2025
- GNI per capita (current LCU)3,370.3Ranked 180th▼ 16· 2025
- GNI per capita growth (annual %)2.7Ranked 56th▼ 96· 2025
- GNI per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $)4,624.5Ranked 78th▼ 45· 2025
- GNI per capita, PPP (current international $)5,310Ranked 147th▼ 11· 2025
- GNI, PPP (constant 2021 international $)25.04BRanked 92nd▼ 36· 2025
- GNI, PPP (current international $)28.77BRanked 143rd▼ 7· 2025
- Goods exports (BoP, current US$)3.01BRanked 79th▼ 46· 2025
- Goods imports (BoP, current US$)7.84BRanked 78th▼ 39· 2025
- Government consumption as a share of GDP20.2%Ranked 83rd▲ 13· 2023
- Government consumption as a share of GDP20.2%Ranked 83rd▲ 13· 2023
- Government expenditure2.02BRanked 103rd▼ 9· 2025
- Government revenues as a share of GDP7.8%Ranked 125th▼ 12· 2021
- Grants, excluding technical cooperation (BoP, current US$)3.38BRanked 5th▼ 4· 2023
- Gross capital formation (annual % growth)4.6Ranked 66th▼ 81· 2025
- Gross capital formation (constant 2015 US$)3.64BRanked 101st▼ 17· 2025
- Gross capital formation (constant LCU)3.64BRanked 119th▼ 24· 2025
- Gross capital formation (current LCU)4.39BRanked 126th▼ 28· 2025
- Gross capital formation (current US$)4.39BRanked 109th▼ 20· 2025
- Gross domestic income (constant LCU)12.42BRanked 125th▼ 21· 2025
- Gross domestic product (GDP)12.46BRanked 137th▼ 7· 2025
- Gross domestic product (GDP)24.08BRanked 137th—· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)24.08BRanked 137th—· 2022
- Gross domestic product (GDP)20.34BRanked 147th▲ 2· 2024
- Gross domestic product (GDP)24.08BRanked 137th—· 2022
- Gross Domestic Product, GDP in millions constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202529,016.3Ranked 150th▲ 1· 2022
- Gross domestic savings (current LCU)-1.31BRanked 122nd▼ 33· 2025
- Gross domestic savings (current US$)-1.31BRanked 131st▼ 34· 2025
- Gross domestic savings (% of GDP)-7.7Ranked 129th▼ 29· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth)4.7Ranked 59th▼ 91· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$)3.4BRanked 103rd▼ 14· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU)3.4BRanked 119th▼ 23· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (current LCU)4.11BRanked 123rd▼ 29· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (current US$)4.11BRanked 106th▼ 21· 2025
- Gross fixed capital formation (% of GDP)24Ranked 45th▼ 39· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (constant 2015 US$)16.5BRanked 100th▼ 18· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (constant LCU)16.5BRanked 119th▼ 23· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (current LCU)22.87BRanked 126th▼ 26· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (current US$)22.87BRanked 102nd▼ 19· 2025
- Gross national expenditure deflator (base year varies by country)138.6Ranked 59th▼ 13· 2025
- Gross national expenditure (% of GDP)133.2Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2025
- Gross national income (GNI) per capita4,624.5Ranked 77th▼ 45· 2025
- Gross national income (GNI) per capita4,624.5Ranked 77th▼ 45· 2025
- Gross national income per capita6,547.1Ranked 138th▲ 7· 2023
- Gross national income per capita (male)10,805.9Ranked 122nd▲ 5· 2023
- Gross receipts by developing countries of mobilised private finance (MPF) - on an experimental basis (millions of United States dollars)0.39Ranked 107th▲ 47· 2024
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official concessional sustainable development loans (millions of United States dollars)1.7Ranked 103rd▲ 19· 2024
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official non-concessional sustainable development loans (millions of United States dollars)251.9Ranked 60th▼ 20· 2024
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants from South-South cooperation providers (millions of United States dollars)0.17Ranked 12th▼ 43· 2023
- Gross receipts by developing countries of official sustainable development grants (millions of United States dollars)3,201.4Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2024
- Gross receipts by developing countries of private grants (millions of United States dollars)20.7Ranked 29th▼ 19· 2024
- Gross savings (current LCU)1.58BRanked 71st▼ 66· 2025
- Gross savings (current US$)1.58BRanked 67th▼ 57· 2025
- Gross savings (% of GNI)8.6Ranked 70th▼ 69· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$)10.16BRanked 127th▼ 14· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant LCU)10.16BRanked 147th▼ 17· 2025
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current LCU)13.13BRanked 164th▲ 1· 2024
- Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (current US$)13.13BRanked 138th▲ 8· 2024
- Harmonized national poverty line8.9Ranked 2nd· 2023
- Harmonized test scores among all students412.3Ranked 90th▲ 5· 2020
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (annual % growth)6.8Ranked 18th▼ 143· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant 2015 US$)10.84BRanked 104th▼ 17· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (constant LCU)10.84BRanked 124th▼ 20· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current LCU)15.55BRanked 127th▼ 23· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (current US$)15.55BRanked 99th▼ 16· 2025
- Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure: linked series (current LCU)15.55BRanked 127th▼ 22· 2025
- Households and NPISHs final consumption expenditure (% of GDP)90.6Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita (constant 2015 US$)2,001.9Ranked 91st▼ 24· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita growth (annual %)4.4Ranked 25th▼ 134· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (constant 2021 international $)3,909.5Ranked 102nd▼ 24· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)3,169.6Ranked 106th▼ 18· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (constant 2021 international $)21.16BRanked 108th▼ 18· 2025
- Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure, PPP (current international $)17.16BRanked 110th▼ 13· 2025
- Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1)0.58Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2020
- Human Development Index0.67Ranked 103rd▲ 15· 2023
- ICT service exports (BoP, current US$)91.02MRanked 104th—· 2024
- ICT service exports (% of service exports, BoP)17.7Ranked 27th▼ 17· 2024
- IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$)-750,000Ranked 44th· 2013
- Imports from China as a share of GDP16.2%Ranked 8th▼ 101· 2024
- Imports of goods and services (annual % growth)-0.19Ranked 111th▼ 48· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (BoP, current US$)9.23BRanked 80th▼ 40· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)6.57BRanked 106th▼ 15· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (constant LCU)6.57BRanked 123rd▼ 21· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (current LCU)9.19BRanked 131st▼ 26· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (current US$)9.19BRanked 106th▼ 14· 2025
- Imports of goods and services (% of GDP)53.5Ranked 49th▼ 19· 2025
- Imports of goods, services and primary income (BoP, current US$)9.33BRanked 80th▼ 45· 2025
- Inactivity rate by sex and disability status (%)55Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Inactivity rate by sex and education (%)54.5Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2025
- Inactivity rate by sex and marital status (%)54.5Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2025
- Inactivity rate by sex, education and disability status (%)55Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Inactivity rate by sex, education and marital status (%)54.5Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2025
- Inactivity rate by sex, marital status and disability status (%)55Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Incidence of part-time employment by sex (%)1.7Ranked 37th▼ 52· 2025
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%5.2Ranked 37th▼ 12· 2023
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%5.2Ranked 35th▼ 12· 2023
- Income or consumption of the poorest 10%5.2Ranked 37th▼ 12· 2023
- Income share of the richest 1%16.2%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2023
- Income share of the richest 10% after tax49.3%Ranked 3rd▼ 9· 2023
- Income share of the richest 1% after tax15.4%Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2023
- Industry (including construction), value added (annual % growth)8Ranked 28th▼ 156· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant 2015 US$)2.54BRanked 128th▼ 13· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (constant LCU)2.54BRanked 145th▼ 15· 2025
- Industry (including construction), value added (current LCU)2.6BRanked 162nd—· 2024
- Industry (including construction), value added (current US$)2.6BRanked 140th▲ 3· 2024
- Industry (including construction), value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)8,226Ranked 131st▲ 4· 2022
- Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index0.54Ranked 59th▼ 13· 2023
- Inequality in income0.31Ranked 110th—· 2023
- Inflation, consumer prices (annual %)9.8%Ranked 148th▼ 22· 2025
- Inflation, GDP deflator (annual %)2.7Ranked 71st▼ 102· 2025
- Inflation, GDP deflator: linked series (annual %)2.7Ranked 71st▼ 102· 2025
- Informal care employment by sex (thousands)22.3Ranked 17th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal care employment rate by sex (%)19.1Ranked 16th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment by economic activity and occupation (thousands)351.3Ranked 23rd▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment by ILO sector and sex (thousands)351.3Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and disability status (thousands)611.9Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2022
- Informal employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)351.3Ranked 18th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)351.3Ranked 23rd▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and education (thousands)351.3Ranked 23rd▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and establishment size (thousands)351.3Ranked 20th▼ 16· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and marital status (thousands)351.3Ranked 20th▼ 25· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)351.3Ranked 21st▼ 22· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and occupation (thousands)351.3Ranked 24th▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and public/private sector (thousands)351.3Ranked 21st▼ 19· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)351.3Ranked 24th▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)351.3Ranked 24th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, economic activity and disability status (thousands)611.9Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2022
- Informal employment by sex, economic activity and education (thousands)351.3Ranked 22nd▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, economic activity and establishment size (thousands)351.3Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, economic activity and marital status (thousands)351.3Ranked 19th▼ 25· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (thousands)351.3Ranked 20th▼ 19· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, education and disability status (thousands)611.9Ranked 29th▲ 8· 2022
- Informal employment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)351.3Ranked 19th▼ 25· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, establishment size and disability status (thousands)611.9Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2022
- Informal employment by sex, establishment size and marital status (thousands)351.3Ranked 17th▼ 15· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)611.9Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2022
- Informal employment by sex, occupation and disability status (thousands)611.9Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2022
- Informal employment by sex, occupation and education (thousands)351.3Ranked 23rd▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, occupation and establishment size (thousands)351.3Ranked 20th▼ 16· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, occupation and marital status (thousands)351.3Ranked 20th▼ 25· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, occupation and public/private sector (thousands)351.3Ranked 21st▼ 19· 2025
- Informal employment by sex, public/private sector and disability status (thousands)611.9Ranked 24th▲ 9· 2022
- Informal employment by sex, public/private sector and marital status (thousands)351.3Ranked 18th▼ 19· 2025
- Informal employment by sex (thousands)351.3Ranked 24th▼ 24· 2025
- Informal employment in STEM occupations (thousands)9.8Ranked 16th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by economic activity and occupation (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by ILO sector and sex (%)48.8Ranked 14th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex (%)48.8Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and disability status (%)53.9Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2022
- Informal employment rate by sex and economic activity (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (%)48.8Ranked 14th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and education (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and establishment size (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 13· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and marital status (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and occupation (%)48.8Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 16· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and public/private sector (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex and weekly hours actually worked (%)48.8Ranked 17th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, economic activity and disability status (%)53.9Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2022
- Informal employment rate by sex, economic activity and education (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, economic activity and establishment size (%)48.8Ranked 14th▼ 13· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, economic activity and marital status (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, education and disability status (%)53.9Ranked 22nd▲ 6· 2022
- Informal employment rate by sex, education and marital status (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, establishment size and disability status (%)53.9Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2022
- Informal employment rate by sex, establishment size and marital status (%)48.8Ranked 14th▼ 12· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, marital status and disability status (%)53.9Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2022
- Informal employment rate by sex, occupation and disability status (%)53.9Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2022
- Informal employment rate by sex, occupation and education (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, occupation and establishment size (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 13· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, occupation and marital status (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, occupation and public/private sector (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate by sex, public/private sector and disability status (%)53.9Ranked 23rd▲ 7· 2022
- Informal employment rate by sex, public/private sector and marital status (%)48.8Ranked 15th▼ 17· 2025
- Informal employment rate by status in employment (by sex) (%)48.8Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Informal employment rate in STEM occupations (%)21.4Ranked 11th▼ 10· 2025
- Informal payments to public officials (% of firms)14.5Ranked 14th▼ 5· 2023
- Inspectors per 10'000 employed persons0.92Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2022
- Insurance and financial services (% of service exports, BoP)0.01Ranked 167th▼ 5· 2022
- Insurance and financial services (% of service imports, BoP)5.3Ranked 61st▼ 38· 2025
- Interest rate spread (lending rate minus deposit rate, %)3.3Ranked 79th▼ 3· 2021
- International migrant stock, total272,481Ranked 105th▲ 4· 2024
- International tourism, expenditures (current US$)567MRanked 68th▼ 13· 2020
- International tourism, expenditures for passenger transport items (current US$)9MRanked 89th▼ 16· 2020
- International tourism, expenditures for travel items (current US$)558MRanked 68th▼ 17· 2020
- International tourism, expenditures (% of total imports)7Ranked 19th▼ 20· 2020
- International tourism, number of arrivals93,000Ranked 112th▼ 26· 2020
- International tourism, receipts (current US$)245MRanked 130th▼ 1· 2018
- International tourism, receipts for travel items (current US$)191MRanked 113th▼ 16· 2020
- International tourism, receipts (% of total exports)9.4Ranked 80th▼ 8· 2018
- Investment in ICT with private participation (current US$)23.8MRanked 9th▲ 2· 2000
- Jobs gap rate (%)30.7Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2025
- Jobs gap (thousands)318.4Ranked 18th▼ 24· 2025
- Labor force, female (% of total labor force)21.5Ranked 173rd▼ 3· 2022
- Labor force participation rate45%Ranked 165th▼ 4· 2022
- Labor force participation rate45%Ranked 165th▼ 4· 2022
- Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)20.1Ranked 176th▼ 2· 2022
- Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+) (national estimate)18.2Ranked 68th▼ 33· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (modeled ILO estimate)10.9Ranked 174th▼ 4· 2022
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, female (%) (national estimate)12Ranked 70th▼ 32· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (modeled ILO estimate)51.1Ranked 66th▼ 9· 2022
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, male (%) (national estimate)51.6Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2025
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, total (%) (modeled ILO estimate)30.8Ranked 137th▼ 7· 2022
- Labor force participation rate for ages 15-24, total (%) (national estimate)32.2Ranked 51st▼ 22· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)75.3Ranked 114th▼ 11· 2022
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate)72.1Ranked 73rd▼ 11· 2022
- Labor force participation rate, male (% of male population ages 15+) (national estimate)72Ranked 29th▼ 6· 2025
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate)47.3Ranked 169th▼ 2· 2022
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate)45Ranked 166th▼ 4· 2022
- Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+) (national estimate)45.5Ranked 68th▼ 31· 2025
- Labor force, total1.39MRanked 136th▼ 2· 2022
- Labor force with advanced education, female (% of female working-age population with advanced education)54.8Ranked 16th▼ 71· 2025
- Labor force with advanced education, male (% of male working-age population with advanced education)85.3Ranked 9th▼ 11· 2025
- Labor force with advanced education (% of total working-age population with advanced education)67.6Ranked 17th▼ 71· 2025
- Labor force with basic education, female (% of female working-age population with basic education)6.2Ranked 17th▼ 77· 2025
- Labor force with basic education, male (% of male working-age population with basic education)71.9Ranked 4th▼ 12· 2025
- Labor force with basic education (% of total working-age population with basic education)44.1Ranked 11th▼ 39· 2025
- Labor force with intermediate education, female (% of female working-age population with intermediate education)11.2Ranked 17th▼ 76· 2025
- Labor force with intermediate education, male (% of male working-age population with intermediate education)68.6Ranked 12th▼ 58· 2025
- Labor force with intermediate education (% of total working-age population with intermediate education)38Ranked 17th▼ 75· 2025
- Labour dependency ratio -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 20253.8Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2022
- Labour force by sex and disability status (thousands)1,503Ranked 53rd▲ 9· 2022
- Labour force by sex and education (thousands)1,009.8Ranked 55th▼ 24· 2025
- Labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)1,009.8Ranked 31st▼ 25· 2025
- Labour force by sex, education and disability status (thousands)1,503Ranked 51st▲ 7· 2022
- Labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)1,009.8Ranked 30th▼ 25· 2025
- Labour force by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)1,503Ranked 53rd▲ 9· 2022
- Labour force participation rate by sex and disability status (%)45Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Labour force participation rate by sex and education (%)45.5Ranked 69th▼ 26· 2025
- Labour force participation rate by sex and marital status (%)45.5Ranked 37th▼ 27· 2025
- Labour force participation rate by sex, education and disability status (%)45Ranked 60th▲ 4· 2022
- Labour force participation rate by sex, education and marital status (%)45.5Ranked 36th▼ 27· 2025
- Labour force participation rate by sex, marital status and disability status (%)45Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Labour income share as a percent of GDP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)42.7Ranked 115th▲ 12· 2022
- Labour inspection visits per inspector133.7Ranked 15th▲ 6· 2022
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 3: employment and economic benefits30%Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Legislation on sexual harassment in employment0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Lending interest rate (%)5.6Ranked 80th▼ 8· 2021
- Listed domestic companies, total48Ranked 52nd▲ 1· 2025
- Local guests in hotels and similar establishments49,000Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2024
- Local guests in hotels and similar establishments49,000Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2024
- Low pay rate by sex (%)30.8Ranked 2nd▼ 15· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex (%)29.9Ranked 37th▼ 47· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex and disability status (%)25.9Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2022
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex and education (%)29.9Ranked 37th▼ 47· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex and marital status (%)29.9Ranked 31st▼ 25· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex, education and marital status (%)29.9Ranked 31st▼ 26· 2025
- LU2: Combined rate of time-related underemployment and unemployment by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)25.9Ranked 171st▼ 3· 2022
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex (%)30.4Ranked 33rd▼ 45· 2025
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex and disability status (%)29.7Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2022
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex and education (%)30.4Ranked 33rd▼ 44· 2025
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex and marital status (%)30.4Ranked 26th▼ 21· 2025
- LU3: Combined rate of unemployment and potential labour force by sex, education and marital status (%)30.4Ranked 26th▼ 21· 2025
- LU4: Composite measure of labour underutilization by sex (thousands)325.8Ranked 20th▼ 27· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex (%)31.5Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex and disability status (%)31Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex and education (%)31.5Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex and marital status (%)31.5Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2025
- LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization by sex, education and marital status (%)31.5Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2025
- Machinery and transport equipment (% of value added in manufacturing)2.1Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2021
- Male employment in industry33.8%Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2022
- Male employment in services59.9%Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2022
- Male labor force participation rate72.1%Ranked 73rd▼ 11· 2022
- Male unemployment rate20.2%Ranked 178th▼ 2· 2022
- Management practices index44.5Ranked 40th▲ 7· 2023
- Manufacturing, value added (annual % growth)10.6Ranked 8th▼ 156· 2025
- Manufacturing, value added (constant 2015 US$)1.91BRanked 96th▼ 15· 2025
- Manufacturing, value added (constant LCU)1.91BRanked 119th▼ 23· 2025
- Manufacturing, value added (current LCU)1.81BRanked 148th▼ 3· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (current US$)1.81BRanked 114th▲ 3· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP)11.3Ranked 82nd▼ 11· 2024
- Manufacturing, value added (% of GDP)11.3%Ranked 81st▼ 11· 2024
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (current US$)4.94BRanked 63rd▼ 1· 2025
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (% of GDP)28.8Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2025
- Market capitalization of listed domestic companies (% of GDP)28.8%Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2025
- Mean13.8Ranked 54th▲ 6· 2016
- Mean15Ranked 40th▼ 19· 2023
- Mean15Ranked 40th▼ 19· 2023
- Mean15Ranked 40th▼ 19· 2023
- Mean10.9Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2016
- Mean10.9Ranked 59th▲ 6· 2016
- Mean income or consumption per day15Ranked 38th▼ 19· 2023
- Mean income or consumption per day (2011 prices)10.9Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2016
- Mechanisms in place to enhance policy coherence for sustainable development (%)94Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2025
- Median9Ranked 58th▲ 7· 2016
- Median12Ranked 39th▼ 17· 2023
- Median (2021 prices)12Ranked 39th▼ 17· 2023
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and disability status (local currency)14.6Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2022
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)15.6Ranked 18th▼ 12· 2025
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)15.6Ranked 18th▼ 12· 2025
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)15.6Ranked 19th▼ 12· 2025
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex and occupation (local currency)15.6Ranked 18th▼ 12· 2025
- Median hourly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)15.6Ranked 19th▼ 12· 2025
- Median income or consumption per day12Ranked 37th▼ 17· 2023
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and disability status (local currency)2,499.8Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2022
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and economic activity (local currency)2,499.8Ranked 19th▼ 27· 2025
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and education (local currency)2,499.8Ranked 19th▼ 26· 2025
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and marital status (local currency)2,499.8Ranked 20th▼ 26· 2025
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex and occupation (local currency)2,499.8Ranked 19th▼ 26· 2025
- Median monthly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)2,499.8Ranked 20th▼ 26· 2025
- Medical doctors per 1,000 people2.2Ranked 68th▼ 14· 2018
- Medium and high-tech manufacturing value added (% manufacturing value added)7.2Ranked 124th▼ 1· 2022
- Mineral rents (% of GDP)0Ranked 90th▲ 1· 2021
- Mismanaged plastic waste0.43Ranked 126th· 2019
- Monetary Sector credit to private sector (% GDP)56.5Ranked 27th▼ 18· 2025
- Monthly minimum wage (local currency)1,450Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2013
- National estimates28.7%Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex (%)25.8Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and disability status (%)25.4Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2022
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and education (%)25.8Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex and marital status (%)25.8Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2025
- NEET rate: Share of youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (%)25.4Ranked 54th▲ 8· 2022
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and disability status (thousands)263.6Ranked 30th▲ 9· 2022
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and education (thousands)166.7Ranked 25th▼ 20· 2025
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex and marital status (thousands)166.7Ranked 23rd▼ 19· 2025
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)258.8Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2022
- NEET: Youth not in employment, education or training by sex (thousands)166.7Ranked 29th▼ 17· 2025
- Net barter terms of trade index (2015 = 100)81.4Ranked 168th▲ 6· 2024
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Estonia (current US$)112,457Ranked 14th▲ 5· 2023
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Lithuania (current US$)332,134Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Net capital account (BoP, current US$)386.16MRanked 21st▼ 10· 2025
- Net domestic credit (current LCU)12.7BRanked 83rd▼ 43· 2025
- Net errors and omissions (BoP, current US$)461.79MRanked 29th▼ 16· 2025
- Net financial account (BoP, current US$)-2.32BRanked 65th▼ 63· 2025
- Net foreign assets (current LCU)11.81BRanked 74th▼ 40· 2025
- Net ODA received (% of central government expense)45.6Ranked 14th▼ 6· 2021
- Net ODA received (% of GNI)16.2Ranked 11th▼ 12· 2023
- Net ODA received (% of gross capital formation)77.5Ranked 13th▼ 6· 2023
- Net ODA received (% of imports of goods, services and primary income)30.8Ranked 12th▼ 11· 2023
- Net ODA received per capita (current US$)701.5Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Net official development assistance and official aid received (constant 2023 US$)3.62BRanked 8th▼ 6· 2023
- Net official development assistance and official aid received (constant 2023 US$)3.62BRanked 8th▼ 6· 2023
- Net official development assistance and official aid received (current US$)3.62BRanked 8th▼ 6· 2023
- Net official development assistance received (constant 2023 US$)3.62BRanked 8th▼ 6· 2023
- Net official development assistance received (current US$)3.62BRanked 8th▼ 6· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, CERF (current US$)18.7MRanked 12th▼ 11· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IAEA (current US$)263,115Ranked 78th▼ 2· 2022
- Net official flows from UN agencies, IFAD (current US$)-59,670Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, ILO (current US$)2MRanked 13th▼ 13· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, SDGFUND (current US$)250,000Ranked 43rd▲ 27· 2022
- Net official flows from UN agencies, SPRP (current US$)71,623Ranked 10th▲ 6· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNCOVID (current US$)-7,573Ranked 18th▲ 9· 2022
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNDP (current US$)2.52MRanked 46th▲ 4· 2022
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNFPA (current US$)2.94MRanked 44th▼ 6· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNICEF (current US$)12.24MRanked 21st▼ 18· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNIDO (current US$)10,729Ranked 32nd▼ 3· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNRWA (current US$)927.08MRanked 1st—· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNTA (current US$)70,000Ranked 87th▼ 36· 2008
- Net official flows from UN agencies, UNWOMEN (current US$)1.7MRanked 7th▼ 16· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, WFP (current US$)3.66MRanked 34th▼ 10· 2023
- Net official flows from UN agencies, WHO (current US$)1.97MRanked 62nd—· 2023
- Net primary income (BoP, current US$)1.08BRanked 17th▼ 1· 2025
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current LCU)1.08BRanked 25th▼ 9· 2025
- Net primary income (Net income from abroad) (current US$)1.08BRanked 14th▼ 6· 2025
- Net secondary income (BoP, current US$)1.81BRanked 31st▼ 21· 2025
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (constant LCU)2.76BRanked 56th▼ 3· 2012
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current LCU)1.79BRanked 78th▼ 22· 2025
- Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current US$)1.79BRanked 45th▼ 9· 2025
- Net trade in goods and services (BoP, current US$)-5.61BRanked 77th▼ 64· 2025
- Net trade in goods (BoP, current US$)-4.83BRanked 65th▼ 52· 2025
- New business density (new registrations per 1,000 people ages 15-64)0.17Ranked 126th▼ 7· 2024
- New businesses registered (number)525Ranked 121st▼ 9· 2024
- Non-fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by economic activity74Ranked 47th▲ 25· 2020
- Non-fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status1,175.1Ranked 12th· 2015
- Number of countries with an outward investment promotion scheme which can benefit developing countries, including LDCs (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Number of labour inspection visits14,041Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2022
- Number of labour inspectors by sex105Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2022
- Number of policies5Ranked 77th· 2022
- Number of registered workplaces that could be selected for labour inspection7,301Ranked 42nd▲ 17· 2017
- Number of strikes and lockouts by economic activity33Ranked 18th· 2013
- Number of tourism satellite account tables implemented4Ranked 8th—· 2022
- Number of visits or required meetings with tax officials (average for affected firms)2.8Ranked 7th▼ 13· 2023
- Obesity prevalence33.2%Ranked 47th—· 2024
- ODA by recipient (% of GNI)25.8%Ranked 4th▼ 10· 2024
- ODA per capita by recipient763.8Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2024
- % of children who experience violent discipline92%Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Official development assistance (ODA) by recipient4.2BRanked 6th▼ 2· 2024
- Oil rents (% of GDP)0%Ranked 115th▼ 4· 2021
- Oil rents (% of GDP)0Ranked 115th▼ 4· 2021
- Open Data Inventory (ODIN) Coverage Index72.4Ranked 15th—· 2024
- Other manufacturing (% of value added in manufacturing)62.2Ranked 6th—· 2021
- Out-of-pocket as share of total expenditure (%)42.1%Ranked 53rd▼ 16· 2023
- Output per hour worked, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202512.7Ranked 119th▲ 2· 2022
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202514,136Ranked 100th▲ 3· 2022
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202526,234.4Ranked 119th▲ 1· 2022
- Palma ratio (before tax)8.4Ranked 1st▼ 14· 2023
- Part time employment, female (% of total female employment)2.2Ranked 33rd▼ 57· 2025
- Part time employment, male (% of total male employment)1.6Ranked 33rd▼ 57· 2025
- Part time employment, total (% of total employment)1.7Ranked 33rd▼ 57· 2025
- Per capita plastic waste0.06Ranked 79th· 2010
- Personal remittances735.61MRanked 92nd▲ 38· 2024
- Personal remittances, paid (current US$)840,343Ranked 95th▼ 62· 2025
- Personal remittances, received (current US$)693.29MRanked 69th▼ 24· 2025
- Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)5.4%Ranked 51st▲ 33· 2024
- Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$)152.56MRanked 105th▼ 5· 2024
- Persons outside the labour force by sex and disability status (thousands)1,837.7Ranked 44th▲ 6· 2022
- Persons outside the labour force by sex and education (thousands)1,208.7Ranked 49th▼ 20· 2025
- Persons outside the labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)1,208.7Ranked 29th▼ 22· 2025
- Persons outside the labour force by sex, education and disability status (thousands)1,837.7Ranked 43rd▲ 5· 2022
- Persons outside the labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)1,208.7Ranked 28th▼ 22· 2025
- Persons outside the labour force by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)1,837.7Ranked 44th▲ 6· 2022
- Plastic waste exports40.2Ranked 124th▼ 8· 2019
- Plastic waste imports per capita0Ranked 107th▲ 33· 2023
- pl_c0.58Ranked 70th▼ 4· 2019
- pl_con0.56Ranked 67th▼ 4· 2019
- pl_da0.56Ranked 64th▼ 5· 2019
- pl_g0.49Ranked 71st▼ 6· 2019
- pl_gdpo0.46Ranked 100th▲ 14· 2019
- pl_i0.58Ranked 84th▼ 12· 2019
- pl_m0.74Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- pl_n0.43Ranked 74th▼ 2· 2019
- pl_x0.66Ranked 84th▼ 34· 2019
- Poorest 40% borrowing from financial institutions1.8%Ranked 120th▼ 12· 2021
- Poorest decile535.2Ranked 6th▼ 54· 2023
- Poorest decile5.2Ranked 37th▼ 12· 2023
- pop5Ranked 114th—· 2019
- Population by sex -- UN estimates and projections, July 2024 (thousands)3,999.7Ranked 126th—· 2030
- Portfolio equity, net inflows (BoP, current US$)79.15MRanked 31st▼ 61· 2025
- Portfolio investment, net (Balance of Payments, current United States dollars)148.98MRanked 66th▼ 2· 2024
- Portfolio investment, net (Balance of Payments, current United States dollars)305.97MRanked 62nd▼ 10· 2023
- Portfolio Investment, net (BoP, current US$)42.54MRanked 51st▼ 16· 2025
- Potential labour force and willing non-jobseekers rate (%)2.7Ranked 21st▼ 24· 2025
- Potential labour force and willing non-jobseekers (thousands)28.5Ranked 24th▼ 34· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex and disability status (thousands)112.2Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2022
- Potential labour force by sex and education (thousands)24.1Ranked 28th▼ 35· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex and marital status (thousands)24.1Ranked 22nd▼ 18· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex, education and marital status (thousands)24.1Ranked 22nd▼ 18· 2025
- Potential labour force by sex (thousands)24.1Ranked 28th▼ 35· 2025
- Power outages in firms in a typical month (number)16.2Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2019
- PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $)0.63Ranked 158th▼ 10· 2025
- PPP conversion factor, households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure (LCU per international $)0.91Ranked 127th▼ 10· 2025
- PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $)0.79Ranked 133rd▼ 25· 2024
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49)24.8%Ranked 86th▲ 4· 2023
- Price level index (GDP)63.4Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2025
- Price levels relative to the US0.59Ranked 57th▼ 6· 2024
- Primary government expenditures as a proportion of original approved budget (%)91.2%Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2024
- Primary income payments (BoP, current US$)101.69MRanked 90th▼ 60· 2025
- Primary income receipts (BoP, current US$)1.18BRanked 66th▼ 25· 2025
- Projected change in death rate6.8Ranked 133rd▲ 11· 2090
- Proportion of domestic budget funded by domestic taxes (%)80.3Ranked 8th▼ 9· 2021
- Proportion of individuals using the Internet (%)86.6Ranked 52nd▲ 13· 2023
- Proportion of medium and high-tech manufacturing value added in total value added (%) - Manufacturing6%Ranked 83rd▲ 6· 2019
- Proportion of small-scale industries with a loan or line of credit (%)13.3%Ranked 38th▲ 5· 2023
- Proportion of small-scale manufacturing industries in total manufacturing value added based on international classification (%) - Manufacturing59%Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Proportion of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years) who have their need for family planning satisfied with modern methods (% of women aged 15-49 years)61%Ranked 15th—· 2019
- Public employment by sectors and sub-sectors of national accounts - Discontinued (thousands)210.7Ranked 39th▲ 2· 2022
- Public private partnerships investment in ICT (current US$)65MRanked 5th· 1995
- Public sector employees by sex and type of job contract (thousands)141.3Ranked 24th▼ 24· 2025
- Public sector employment23.5%Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2017
- Public sector employment by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (thousands)141.3Ranked 24th▼ 20· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and economic activity (thousands)141.3Ranked 30th▼ 24· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and education (thousands)141.3Ranked 30th▼ 23· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and marital status (thousands)141.3Ranked 27th▼ 22· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (thousands)141.3Ranked 26th▼ 20· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and occupation (thousands)141.3Ranked 30th▼ 24· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and status in employment (thousands)141.3Ranked 31st▼ 24· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and weekly hours actually worked (thousands)141.3Ranked 29th▼ 24· 2025
- Public sector employment by sex and working time arrangement (thousands)141.3Ranked 30th▼ 24· 2025
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate26.3%Ranked 176th▼ 2· 2022
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (modeled ILO estimate)26.3Ranked 177th▼ 2· 2022
- Ratio of female to male labor force participation rate (%) (national estimate)25.3Ranked 70th▼ 33· 2025
- Ratio of same-day to overnight tourist arrivals4.9Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2020
- Ratio of total weekly hours worked to population aged 15-64 by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 202514.4Ranked 172nd▼ 3· 2022
- rconna33,757.9Ranked 116th▲ 1· 2019
- rdana41,872.5Ranked 119th▲ 1· 2019
- Real GDP per capita (Maddison, 2011 int$)4,775.2Ranked 124th▲ 1· 2022
- Real interest rate (%)-3.1Ranked 85th▲ 3· 2021
- Registered vehicles per 1,000 people59.4Ranked 24th· 2015
- Research and development expenditure (% of GDP)0.45%Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2013
- Researchers in R&D (per million people)584.4Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2013
- Reserves and related items (BoP, current US$)252.3MRanked 59th▼ 46· 2025
- Return on assets1.1%Ranked 91st▲ 28· 2023
- Revenue from corporate income taxes (% GDP) (ICTD GRD (2019))0.24%Ranked 115th▼ 5· 2015
- rgdpe30,396.8Ranked 129th—· 2019
- rgdpna32,069.5Ranked 128th▲ 1· 2019
- rgdpo36,793.8Ranked 123rd▼ 5· 2019
- Richest 1%16.2%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2023
- Richest 1%16.2%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2023
- Richest 1%15.4%Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2023
- Richest 10%27.1%Ranked 23rd▼ 29· 2023
- rnna129,720.3Ranked 120th▼ 1· 2019
- Saved any money (% age 15+)28%Ranked 109th▼ 27· 2021
- Scientific and technical journal articles861.7Ranked 88th▼ 1· 2023
- SDG indicator 10.4.1: Labour income share as a percent of GDP (%)42.7Ranked 115th▲ 12· 2022
- SDG indicator 1.3.1: Proportion of population covered by social protection floors/systems by sex and function (%)16.5Ranked 63rd▼ 29· 2022
- SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in managerial positions (%)22Ranked 60th▼ 29· 2025
- SDG indicator 5.5.2: Proportion of women in senior and middle management positions (%)23.5Ranked 31st▼ 44· 2025
- SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US dollars (%)-5Ranked 171st▲ 23· 2022
- SDG indicator 8.2.1: Annual growth rate of output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international dollars at PPP (%)-5Ranked 171st▲ 23· 2022
- SDG indicator 8.3.1: Proportion of informal employment in total employment by sex and economic activity (%)48.8Ranked 16th▼ 18· 2025
- SDG indicator 8.5.1: Average hourly earnings of employees by sex (local currency)19.8Ranked 19th▼ 15· 2025
- SDG indicator 8.5.2: Unemployment rate by sex and disability status (%)24.4Ranked 65th▲ 8· 2022
- SDG indicator 8.6.1: Proportion of youth aged 15 to 24 years not in education, employment or training by sex (%)25.8Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2025
- SDG indicator 8.8.1: Fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status1Ranked 44th▲ 43· 2020
- SDG indicator 8.8.1: Non-fatal occupational injuries per 100'000 workers by sex and migrant status74Ranked 48th▲ 26· 2020
- SDG indicator 9.2.2: Manufacturing employment as a proportion of total employment (%)14.3Ranked 22nd▼ 6· 2025
- Secondary income, other sectors, payments (BoP, current US$)225.02MRanked 72nd▼ 31· 2025
- Secondary income receipts (BoP, current US$)2.04BRanked 65th▼ 30· 2025
- Self-employed, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)22.9Ranked 117th▼ 1· 2022
- Self-employed, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)24Ranked 126th▲ 12· 2022
- Self-employed, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)23.8Ranked 121st▲ 12· 2022
- Self-reported life satisfaction4.7Ranked 106th▲ 1· 2025
- Service exports (BoP, current US$)606.76MRanked 84th▼ 51· 2025
- Service imports (BoP, current US$)1.38BRanked 82nd▼ 43· 2025
- Services, value added (annual % growth)3.7Ranked 74th▼ 113· 2025
- Services, value added (constant 2015 US$)7BRanked 120th▼ 13· 2025
- Services, value added (constant LCU)7BRanked 146th▼ 16· 2025
- Services, value added (current LCU)9.64BRanked 162nd▼ 1· 2024
- Services, value added (current US$)9.64BRanked 123rd▲ 6· 2024
- Services, value added (% of GDP)60.2Ranked 73rd▼ 13· 2024
- Services, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)13,831.5Ranked 97th▲ 8· 2022
- Share agreeing "Most people can be trusted"15.8%Ranked 35th· 2014
- Share agreeing "Most people can be trusted"15.8%Ranked 35th· 2014
- Share below $4.20 a day6.1%Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2023
- Share in extreme poverty2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share in vulnerable employment18.4%Ranked 62nd▼ 8· 2022
- Share living with diabetes15.5%Ranked 30th▼ 10· 2024
- Share of care employment outside the formal sector by sex (%)4.4Ranked 18th▼ 19· 2025
- Share of central government spending funded by taxes80.3%Ranked 7th▼ 9· 2021
- Share of employees with access to parental leave by sex (%)15.4Ranked 3rd▼ 8· 2025
- Share of employment in STEM occupations outside the formal sector (%)5.1Ranked 17th▼ 14· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by economic activity and occupation (%)28.8Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex (%)28.8Ranked 21st▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and disability status (%)30.8Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2022
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and economic activity (%)28.8Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and economic activity - ISIC level 2 (%)28.8Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and education (%)28.8Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and establishment size (%)28.8Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and marital status (%)28.8Ranked 18th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and occupation (%)28.8Ranked 21st▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and occupation - ISCO level 2 (%)28.8Ranked 19th▼ 16· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and public/private sector (%)28.8Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex and weekly hours actually worked (%)28.8Ranked 21st▼ 17· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and disability status (%)30.8Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2022
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and education (%)28.8Ranked 19th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and establishment size (%)28.8Ranked 17th▼ 15· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and marital status (%)28.8Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, economic activity and public/private sector (%)28.8Ranked 19th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, education and disability status (%)30.8Ranked 24th▲ 7· 2022
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, education and marital status (%)28.8Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, establishment size and disability status (%)30.8Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2022
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, establishment size and marital status (%)28.8Ranked 16th▼ 14· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, marital status and disability status (%)30.8Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2022
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and disability status (%)30.8Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2022
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and education (%)28.8Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and establishment size (%)28.8Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and marital status (%)28.8Ranked 18th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, occupation and public/private sector (%)28.8Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, public/private sector and disability status (%)30.8Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2022
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by sex, public/private sector and marital status (%)28.8Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2025
- Share of employment outside the formal sector by status in employment (by sex) (%)28.8Ranked 21st▼ 18· 2025
- Share of female workers in informal employment45.4%Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2022
- Share of household consumption81.9%Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of male workers in informal employment55.5%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2022
- Share of one-person households3.5%Ranked 46th▲ 39· 2007
- Share of people who report having intentions to start business (Global Entrepreneurship Monitor)35.6Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2012
- Share of people who use tobacco34.8%Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of persons outside the labour force due to care responsibilities by sex (%)49.3Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2025
- Share of persons outside the labour force due to care responsibilities by sex and education (%)49.3Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2025
- Share of temporary employees by sex (%)28.8Ranked 6th▼ 12· 2025
- Share of the labor force that is female21.5%Ranked 172nd▼ 3· 2022
- Share of the richest 1%16.2%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2023
- Share of the richest 10%51.5%Ranked 3rd▼ 10· 2023
- Share of workers in informal employment53.9%Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2022
- Share of workers in informal employment53.9%Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2022
- Share of workers who are employees76.2%Ranked 65th▼ 14· 2022
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, female (% of female youth population)26.8Ranked 10th▼ 14· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, female (% of female youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)31Ranked 53rd▲ 7· 2022
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, male (% of male youth population)24.8Ranked 5th▼ 6· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, male (% of male youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)19.8Ranked 58th▲ 13· 2022
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, total (% of youth population)25.8Ranked 6th▼ 7· 2025
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training, total (% of youth population) (modeled ILO estimate)25.4Ranked 54th▲ 8· 2022
- Share (richest decile)27.1%Ranked 23rd▼ 29· 2023
- Share (top 10%, before tax)51.5%Ranked 3rd▼ 10· 2023
- Share (top 1%, before tax)16.2%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2023
- Share (top 1%, before tax)16.2%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2023
- Share who say they're "happy" or "very happy" (IVS)74.4%Ranked 51st· 2014
- Spending by a country’s residents while travelling abroad (current US$)292MRanked 94th▼ 3· 2024
- Spending by international visitors while visiting a country131.96MRanked 107th▼ 16· 2024
- Spending by international visitors while visiting a country as a share of GDP0.82%Ranked 104th▲ 8· 2024
- statcap76.7Ranked 22nd▼ 5· 2019
- Stocks traded, total value (current US$)383.19MRanked 53rd▼ 1· 2025
- Stocks traded, total value (% of GDP)2.2Ranked 40th▼ 6· 2025
- Stocks traded, turnover ratio of domestic shares (%)4Ranked 43rd—· 2024
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates - Sex: both sexes8.7%Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2020
- Taxes as a share of cigarette price84.6%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Taxes including social contributions6.6%Ranked 158th▼ 3· 2021
- Taxes less subsidies on products (constant LCU)2.3BRanked 129th▼ 10· 2025
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current LCU)2.89BRanked 145th—· 2024
- Taxes less subsidies on products (current US$)2.89BRanked 91st▲ 7· 2024
- Taxes on goods and services3.2%Ranked 136th▼ 4· 2021
- Taxes on goods and services3.2%Ranked 136th▼ 4· 2021
- Taxes on income, profits and capital gains0.39%Ranked 144th▼ 4· 2021
- Tax revenue6.6%Ranked 158th▼ 3· 2021
- Tax revenue as a proportion of GDP (%)21.5%Ranked 29th▼ 8· 2021
- Tax revenues (% of GDP)6.6%Ranked 158th▼ 3· 2021
- Technical cooperation grants (BoP, current US$)193.07MRanked 20th▲ 1· 2023
- Terms of trade adjustment (constant LCU)-41.99MRanked 76th▼ 16· 2025
- Textiles and clothing (% of value added in manufacturing)7.3Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2021
- Threshold (per day, poorest decile, 2021 prices)5.2Ranked 37th▼ 12· 2023
- Threshold (per day, richest decile, 2021 prices)27.3Ranked 41st▼ 18· 2023
- Time-related underemployment by sex and disability status (thousands)22Ranked 20th▲ 3· 2022
- Time-related underemployment by sex and education (thousands)11.8Ranked 31st▼ 44· 2025
- Time-related underemployment by sex and marital status (thousands)11.8Ranked 25th▼ 23· 2025
- Time-related underemployment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)11.8Ranked 25th▼ 23· 2025
- Time-related underemployment by sex (thousands)11.8Ranked 31st▼ 44· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex (%)1.6Ranked 28th▼ 38· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex and disability status (%)1.9Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2022
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex and education (%)1.6Ranked 28th▼ 38· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex and marital status (%)1.6Ranked 22nd▼ 21· 2025
- Time-related underemployment rate by sex, education and marital status (%)1.6Ranked 22nd▼ 22· 2025
- Time required to obtain an operating license (days)9Ranked 36th▲ 14· 2023
- Time required to start a business (days)43.5Ranked 16th—· 2019
- Time spent dealing with the requirements of government regulations (% of senior management time)4.5Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2023
- Total government revenue (budgetary central government) as a proportion of GDP (%)7.8Ranked 127th▼ 14· 2021
- Total government revenue, in local currency4,551.9Ranked 119th▼ 7· 2021
- Total imports as a share of GDP90.3%Ranked 10th▼ 142· 2024
- Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)0Ranked 180th▼ 5· 2021
- Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)0%Ranked 179th▼ 5· 2021
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for technical cooperation (millions of 2023 United States dollars)192.16MRanked 50th—· 2023
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for technical cooperation (millions of 2024 United States dollars)438.2Ranked 32nd▼ 18· 2024
- Total official flows (commitments) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)99.95MRanked 70th▲ 7· 2023
- Total official flows (commitments) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)82.8Ranked 84th▲ 11· 2024
- Total official flows (disbursement) for Aid for Trade, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)95.9Ranked 77th▲ 15· 2024
- Total official flows for infrastructure, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)118.13MRanked 76th▼ 9· 2023
- Total reserves (includes gold, current US$)1.83BRanked 101st▼ 29· 2025
- Total reserves in months of imports2.3Ranked 69th▼ 51· 2025
- Total reserves in months of imports (ratio)1.4Ranked 108th▼ 24· 2023
- Total reserves in months of imports (ratio)1.9Ranked 101st▼ 31· 2024
- Total reserves minus gold (current US$)1.83BRanked 99th▼ 28· 2025
- Total trade of tracked Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)364.27MRanked 116th▲ 1· 2023
- Total weekly hours worked of employed persons by sex -- ILO modelled estimates, Nov. 2025 (thousands)43,883.1Ranked 139th▼ 2· 2022
- Tourism contribution to GDP0.66%Ranked 74th▲ 10· 2020
- Tourism direct GDP as a proportion of total GDP (%)0.66Ranked 77th▲ 14· 2020
- Trade in services (% of GDP)11.6Ranked 76th▼ 48· 2025
- Trade in services (% of GDP)11.6%Ranked 75th▼ 48· 2025
- Trade (% of GDP)74.8%Ranked 76th▼ 22· 2025
- Trade union density rate (%)21.3Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2019
- Transport services (% of service exports, BoP)2.2Ranked 94th▼ 61· 2025
- Transport services (% of service imports, BoP)42Ranked 18th▼ 35· 2025
- Travel services (% of service exports, BoP)30.3Ranked 45th▼ 53· 2025
- Travel services (% of service imports, BoP)34.2Ranked 20th▼ 60· 2025
- Trips by domestic tourists per person0Ranked 65th▲ 7· 2020
- Unadjused gender wage gap13.2%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Unadjusted gender wage gap13.2%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Unemployment by sex and categories of unemployed persons (thousands)289.9Ranked 33rd▼ 14· 2025
- Unemployment by sex and disability status (thousands)367Ranked 43rd▲ 9· 2022
- Unemployment by sex and education (thousands)289.9Ranked 38th▼ 18· 2025
- Unemployment by sex and marital status (thousands)289.9Ranked 19th▼ 15· 2025
- Unemployment by sex, duration and marital status (thousands)289.9Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2025
- Unemployment by sex, education and disability status (thousands)367Ranked 41st▲ 8· 2022
- Unemployment by sex, education and marital status (thousands)289.9Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2025
- Unemployment by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)367Ranked 42nd▲ 9· 2022
- Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)40Ranked 184th▼ 3· 2022
- Unemployment, female (% of female labor force) (national estimate)29.7Ranked 65th▼ 38· 2025
- Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (modeled ILO estimate)20.2Ranked 179th▼ 2· 2022
- Unemployment, male (% of male labor force) (national estimate)28.5Ranked 68th▼ 34· 2025
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex and former economic activity (thousands)244.1Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2025
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex and former occupation (thousands)210.1Ranked 24th▼ 16· 2025
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex, former economic activity and education (thousands)135.8Ranked 30th—· 2022
- Unemployment of previously employed persons by sex, occupation and education (thousands)135.8Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2022
- Unemployment rate24.4%Ranked 180th▲ 1· 2022
- Unemployment rate, ages 15-2436.1%Ranked 172nd▼ 5· 2022
- Unemployment rate by sex and disability status (%)24.4Ranked 65th▲ 8· 2022
- Unemployment rate by sex and education (%)28.7Ranked 68th▼ 29· 2025
- Unemployment rate by sex and marital status (%)28.7Ranked 36th▼ 30· 2025
- Unemployment rate by sex, education and disability status (%)24.4Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Unemployment rate by sex, education and marital status (%)28.7Ranked 35th▼ 30· 2025
- Unemployment rate by sex, marital status and disability status (%)24.4Ranked 64th▲ 8· 2022
- Unemployment rate in persons without disability24.4%Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Unemployment, total (% of total labor force) (national estimate)28.7Ranked 65th▼ 39· 2025
- Unemployment with advanced education, female (% of female labor force with advanced education)34.3Ranked 17th▼ 75· 2025
- Unemployment with advanced education, male (% of male labor force with advanced education)17.8Ranked 17th▼ 73· 2025
- Unemployment with advanced education (% of total labor force with advanced education)25.6Ranked 17th▼ 75· 2025
- Unemployment with basic education, female (% of female labor force with basic education)15.2Ranked 15th▼ 51· 2025
- Unemployment with basic education, male (% of male labor force with basic education)33.7Ranked 17th▼ 77· 2025
- Unemployment with basic education (% of total labor force with basic education)32.6Ranked 17th▼ 75· 2025
- Unemployment with intermediate education, female (% of female labor force with intermediate education)27Ranked 17th▼ 70· 2025
- Unemployment with intermediate education, male (% of male labor force with intermediate education)24.2Ranked 17th▼ 72· 2025
- Unemployment with intermediate education (% of total labor force with intermediate education)24.6Ranked 17th▼ 72· 2025
- Unemployment, youth female (% of female labor force ages 15-24) (modeled ILO estimate)56.6Ranked 180th▼ 4· 2022
- Unemployment, youth female (% of female labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)56.1Ranked 64th▼ 38· 2025
- Unemployment, youth male (% of male labor force ages 15-24) (modeled ILO estimate)31.6Ranked 165th▼ 8· 2022
- Unemployment, youth male (% of male labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)37.4Ranked 67th▼ 33· 2025
- Unemployment, youth total (% of total labor force ages 15-24) (national estimate)40.8Ranked 68th▼ 32· 2025
- Unmet need for contraception (% of married women ages 15-49)12.9%Ranked 14th▼ 17· 2020
- Usage of improved sanitation facilities99.7%Ranked 29th—· 2024
- Volume of remittances (in United States dollars) as a proportion of total GDP (%)5.4Ranked 45th▲ 28· 2024
- Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)20.9Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2022
- Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)17.9Ranked 59th▼ 10· 2022
- Wage and salaried workers, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)77.1Ranked 70th—· 2022
- Wage and salaried workers, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)76Ranked 61st▼ 13· 2022
- Wage and salaried workers, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)76.2Ranked 66th▼ 13· 2022
- Wholesale price index (2010 = 100)143.1Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Women of reproductive age24.8%Ranked 86th▲ 4· 2023
- Women of reproductive age with anemia24.8%Ranked 86th▲ 4· 2023
- Workers in the reference group by economic activity (thousands)54.7Ranked 55th· 2015
- Workers in the reference group by sex and migrant status (thousands)54.7Ranked 32nd· 2015
- Working-age population by sex and disability status (thousands)3,340.6Ranked 50th▲ 8· 2022
- Working-age population by sex and education (thousands)2,218.5Ranked 53rd▼ 23· 2025
- Working-age population by sex and labour market status (thousands)2,218.5Ranked 37th▼ 39· 2025
- Working-age population by sex and marital status (thousands)2,218.5Ranked 30th▼ 24· 2025
- Working-age population by sex, disability status and labour market status (thousands)3,340.6Ranked 51st▲ 9· 2022
- Working-age population by sex, education and citizenship (thousands)3,245.7Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2021
- Working-age population by sex, education and disability status (thousands)3,340.6Ranked 48th▲ 6· 2022
- Working-age population by sex, education and labour market status (thousands)2,218.5Ranked 36th▼ 38· 2025
- Working-age population by sex, education and marital status (thousands)2,218.5Ranked 29th▼ 24· 2025
- Working-age population by sex, education and place of birth (thousands)3,245.7Ranked 52nd· 2021
- Working-age population by sex, marital status and disability status (thousands)3,340.6Ranked 50th▲ 8· 2022
- Working-age population by sex, marital status and labour market status (thousands)2,218.5Ranked 30th▼ 23· 2025
- xr1Ranked 121st—· 2019
- Youth transited by sex and economic activity (thousands)39.1Ranked 18th▼ 35· 2025
- Youth transited by sex and occupation (thousands)39.1Ranked 18th▼ 35· 2025
- Youth transited by sex and status in employment (thousands)39.1Ranked 18th▼ 35· 2025
- Youth working-age population by sex, education and forms of transition (thousands)936.9Ranked 15th▼ 21· 2025
- Youth working-age population by sex, education and stages of transition (thousands)936.9Ranked 15th▼ 21· 2025
- Unemployment rate (ILO modelled)24.4%Ranked 181st▲ 1· 2022
- Youth unemployment rate (ILO modelled)36.1%Ranked 173rd▼ 5· 2022
- Labour force participation rate45%Ranked 166th▼ 4· 2022
- Employment-to-population ratio34%Ranked 178th▼ 3· 2022
- Capital stock per worker129,490Ranked 91st▲ 3· 2019
Life expectancy
- Life expectancy69.2Ranked 160th▼ 28· 2024
- Infant mortality17Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2024
- Maternal mortality16Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Health spending10.7%Ranked 21st▼ 11· 2023
- Physicians2.2Ranked 68th▼ 14· 2018
- Basic sanitation access99.4%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Basic drinking water access98.8%Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2024
- Measles immunization89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence0.29Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Road traffic deaths5.3Ranked 14th· 2016
- Suicide mortality rate0.65Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2021
- Smoking prevalence35.5%Ranked 127th▲ 7· 2024
- PM2.5 air pollution exposure22.4Ranked 131st▼ 2· 2023
- Child mortality3.8Ranked 114th▼ 6· 2024
- 0-27 days probability of death0.64%Ranked 44th▲ 2· 2019
- Access antibiotics13.8Ranked 24th▼ 6· 2023
- Adequate stool collection96%Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2023
- Adult mortality rate (probability of dying between 15 and 60 years per 1000 population)114.4Ranked 54th▲ 9· 2021
- Adult obesity33.2%Ranked 47th—· 2024
- Adult T-cell leukemia and lymphoma100%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Affordability - percentage of GDP per capita required to purchase 2000 cigarettes of the most sold brand18.6Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2022
- Age-standardized cervical cancer incidence rate per 100,000 women3.1Ranked 171st· 2022
- Age-standardized death rate from snakebite envenoming0.02Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Age-standardized NCD mortality rate (per 100 000 population)557.9Ranked 104th▲ 14· 2021
- Age-standardized suicide rates (per 100 000 population)0.8Ranked 180th▼ 1· 2021
- AIDS-related deaths84.9Ranked 42nd▼ 1· 2024
- All cases of new TB100Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2023
- Amount of water- and sanitation-related official development assistance that is part of a government-coordinated spending plan (constant 2024 US$ millions)142.4Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2024
- Annual budget for tobacco control in currency reported30,000Ranked 85th▲ 4· 2022
- Annual mortality rate (ages 65+)59.9Ranked 131st· 2011
- Annual tax revenues - import duties and all other taxes (excluding corporate taxes on tobacco companies)0Ranked 77th· 2020
- Annual tax revenues - total excise (specific and ad valorem)1.09BRanked 1st—· 2015
- Annual tax revenues - total revenues1.28BRanked 1st—· 2015
- Annual tax revenues - value added tax (vat) and other sales taxes198.53MRanked 1st▼ 1· 2015
- Antenatal care coverage - at least four visits (%)94.8%Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2020
- Antenatal care coverage - at least four visits (%)94.8Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2020
- Antenatal care coverage - at least one visit (percent)98.7Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Antibiotic usage in children70.1%Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2018
- ARI treatment (% of children under 5 taken to a health provider)77.3Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2020
- ARI treatment (% of children under 5 taken to a health provider)77.3%Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2020
- Average cost of drugs spent per patient starting multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment5,000Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2019
- Average death rate due to natural disasters (per 100 000 population)0.02Ranked 8th▼ 62· 2018
- Bans on tobacco advertising5Ranked 1st—· 2022
- BCG immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- BCG immunized, coverage among 1-year-olds (%)87Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Births attended by skilled health personnel (%)99.7Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2020
- Births attended by skilled health staff (% of total)99.7Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Births attended by skilled health staff (% of total)99.7%Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Breast0.8%Ranked 69th· 2020
- Case detection rate (all forms)70%Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2024
- Case fatality ratio (percentage)15%Ranked 20th▲ 4· 2024
- Cases started on MDR-TB treatment0Ranked 114th▲ 5· 2024
- Cause of death, by communicable diseases and maternal, prenatal and nutrition conditions (% of total)25.4Ranked 87th▼ 8· 2021
- Cause of death, by injury (% of total)6.7Ranked 91st▲ 24· 2021
- Cause of death, by non-communicable diseases (% of total)64.8Ranked 96th▼ 9· 2021
- Cause of death, by other COVID-19 pandemic-related outcomes (% of total)3.1Ranked 61st▲ 39· 2021
- Central death rate at 251.1Ranked 216th▲ 159· 2023
- Central death rate at 652.7Ranked 118th▲ 44· 2023
- Change in female height (%)5.2%Ranked 114th· 1996
- Change in female height (cm)7.9Ranked 115th· 1996
- Change in male height (%)7%Ranked 59th· 1996
- Change in male height (cm)11.2Ranked 55th· 1996
- Change in maternal mortality ratio since 1990-61.9%Ranked 42nd▲ 41· 2015
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported8Ranked 84th· 2020
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in PPP$4.2Ranked 75th· 2020
- Cheapest brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates2.4Ranked 70th· 2020
- Child deaths age 1 to 43,076Ranked 113th▼ 3· 2024
- Child deaths from rotavirus7Ranked 8th· 2016
- Child mortality (per 1000 live births)2.8Ranked 87th—· 2100
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 63rd▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.7%Ranked 158th▼ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate2.6%Ranked 150th▲ 39· 2023
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 114th▼ 6· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.9%Ranked 145th▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 150th▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate0.13Ranked 144th▼ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate2.6%Ranked 150th▲ 39· 2023
- Child mortality rate0.13Ranked 144th▼ 1· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- Child mortality rate from rotavirus0.6Ranked 7th· 2016
- Child mortality rate (full)3.8%Ranked 154th▼ 7· 2024
- Children aged 36-59 months who are developmentally on track in at least three of the following domains: literacy-numeracy, physical development, social-emotional development and learning (%)83.9Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Children orphaned due to AIDS673Ranked 98th▼ 2· 2024
- Cigarette consumption per smoker per day15.3Ranked 72nd▼ 12· 2012
- Circulating Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus (cVDPV) cases0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- CME_ARR_10T19-27.9Ranked 77th· 2021
- CME_ARR_SBR2Ranked 24th· 2023
- CME_ARR_U5MR-8.2Ranked 78th· 2023
- CME_MRM08.9Ranked 93rd▲ 1· 2024
- CME_MRM1T118.1Ranked 59th▼ 9· 2024
- CME_MRM1T5929.2Ranked 27th▲ 5· 2024
- CME_MRY017Ranked 75th▼ 3· 2024
- CME_MRY10T1431.8Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_MRY10T1966.8Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_MRY15T1936.2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_MRY15T2475.8Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_MRY1T421.3Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2024
- CME_MRY20T2441.2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_MRY5T1459Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_MRY5T24130.4Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_MRY5T928.1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- CME_PND0.23Ranked 183rd▼ 5· 2024
- CME_SB1,349Ranked 86th—· 2023
- CME_SBR9.1Ranked 83rd▼ 3· 2023
- CME_TMM01,294Ranked 90th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMM1T111,174Ranked 76th▼ 2· 2024
- CME_TMM1T594,250Ranked 57th▲ 3· 2024
- CME_TMY02,468Ranked 85th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY0T45,544Ranked 69th—· 2024
- CME_TMY10T144,255Ranked 22nd—· 2024
- CME_TMY10T198,417Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2024
- CME_TMY15T194,162Ranked 34th▼ 8· 2024
- CME_TMY15T248,266Ranked 39th▼ 6· 2024
- CME_TMY1T43,076Ranked 46th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY20T244,104Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T148,344Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T2416,610Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2024
- CME_TMY5T94,089Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2024
- Compliance with ban on advertising at point of sale (score)5Ranked 6th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on advertising in local magazines and newspapers (score)7Ranked 4th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on advertising on national television and radio (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Compliance with ban on appearance of tobacco brands in TV and/or films (score)7Ranked 4th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on appearance of tobacco products in TV and/or films (score)0Ranked 10th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on billboard and outdoor advertising (score)7Ranked 4th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on free distribution in mail or through other means (score)7Ranked 4th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on indentifying non-tobacco products with tobacco brand names (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Compliance with ban on promotional discounts (score)7Ranked 4th· 2022
- Compliance with ban on sponsorship (contributions and/or publicity of contributions) (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Compliance with ban on use of brand name of non-tobacco product for tobacco product (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free education facilities except universities law (score)3Ranked 8th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free government facilities law (score)0Ranked 11th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free health-care facilities law (score)5Ranked 6th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free indoor offices law (score)0Ranked 11th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free public transport law (score)0Ranked 10th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free pubs and bars law (score)0Ranked 11th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free restaurants law (score)0Ranked 11th· 2022
- Compliance with smoke-free universities law (score)0Ranked 11th· 2022
- Confirmed cases of RR-/MDR-TB0Ranked 115th▲ 1· 2024
- Confirmed tetanus cases (WHO)0Ranked 56th▲ 3· 2024
- Congenital Rubella Syndrome - number of reported cases0Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2025
- Consumption of iodized salt (% of households)95.7Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2020
- Consumption of iodized salt (% of households)95.7%Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2020
- Continued breastfeeding 12-23 months28.5Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2020
- Cost of a healthy diet3.3Ranked 112th▼ 14· 2024
- Cost of a nutrient adequate diet1.6Ranked 112th· 2021
- Cost of drugs per patient10,000Ranked 8th· 2018
- Coverage of people living with HIV receiving ART58.4%Ranked 97th▼ 7· 2024
- Cumulative maternal under-five offspring mortality among mothers aged 20-44 as a rate per 1000 mothers in the age group8.6Ranked 66th· 2016
- Current health expenditure (CHE) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)10.7%Ranked 21st▼ 11· 2023
- Current health expenditure (CHE) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)10.7Ranked 21st▼ 11· 2023
- Current health expenditure (CHE) per capita in US$345.7Ranked 105th—· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita (current US$)345.7Ranked 105th—· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita (int-$)604.4Ranked 124th▲ 3· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)604.4Ranked 124th▲ 3· 2023
- Current health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)604.4Ranked 124th▲ 3· 2023
- Death rate due to road traffic injuries, by sex (per 100,000 population)4.7Ranked 20th· 2021
- Deaths due to tuberculosis among HIV-negative people (per 100 000 population)0.04Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Deaths due to tuberculosis among HIV-negative people (per 100 000 population)0.04Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2024
- Deaths from snakebite envenoming1Ranked 1st· 2019
- Deaths prevented by rotavirus vaccine0Ranked 1st· 2016
- Defined daily doses of antibiotics and antituberculosis drugs used per 1,000 inhabitants per day29.1Ranked 14th▲ 11· 2023
- Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79)15.5Ranked 30th▼ 10· 2024
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under 5 receiving oral rehydration and continued feeding)37.8Ranked 6th▼ 19· 2020
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under 5 who received ORS packet)34.5Ranked 7th▼ 18· 2020
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under 5 who received ORS packet)34.5%Ranked 7th▼ 17· 2020
- Diarrhea treatment (% of children under five receiving oral rehydration and continued feeding)37.8%Ranked 6th▼ 19· 2020
- Diphtheria - number of reported cases0Ranked 36th—· 2025
- Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis (DTP3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Diphtheria tetanus toxoid and pertussis first-dose (DTP1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC)99Ranked 1st—· 2025
- DM_BRTS144.9Ranked 97th—· 2025
- DM_BRTS_SURVIVING_1119.1Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2100
- DM_DPR_CHD64.2Ranked 37th—· 2025
- DM_DPR_OLD6.6Ranked 165th▲ 1· 2025
- DM_DPR_TOT70.8Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2025
- DM_FRATE_TOT3.2Ranked 48th—· 2025
- DM_LIFE_EXP73.1Ranked 128th▼ 32· 2025
- DM_NET_MG_RATE-4.1Ranked 182nd▼ 4· 2025
- DM_POP_15TO241,078.7Ranked 108th—· 2025
- DM_POP_ADLCNT1,253.9Ranked 103rd▲ 1· 2025
- DM_POP_ADLCNT_PROP22.4Ranked 40th▼ 3· 2025
- DM_POP_CHILD_PROP44.1Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2025
- DM_POP_GRT1.8Ranked 57th▼ 4· 2025
- DM_POP_TOT5,589.6Ranked 120th▼ 1· 2025
- DM_POP_U182,462.2Ranked 99th—· 2025
- DM_POP_U5712.1Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2025
- Domestic funding30,000Ranked 101st· 2020
- Domestic general government expenditure on PHC as % of primary health care expenditure (PHCE) (%)27Ranked 17th· 2022
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)41.4Ranked 133rd▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of general government expenditure (GGE) (%)14.4Ranked 53rd▼ 8· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of general government expenditure (GGE) (%)14.4%Ranked 53rd▼ 8· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) as percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) (%)4.4Ranked 68th▼ 12· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (GGHE-D) per capita in US$143.2Ranked 113th▲ 1· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)41.4Ranked 133rd▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)41.4%Ranked 133rd▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP)4.4Ranked 68th▼ 12· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of GDP)4.4%Ranked 68th▼ 12· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure (% of general government expenditure)14.4Ranked 53rd▼ 8· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure per capita (current US$)143.2Ranked 113th▲ 1· 2023
- Domestic general government health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)250.4Ranked 126th▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic government250.4Ranked 126th▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)49.9Ranked 52nd▼ 13· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure per capita (current US$)172.5Ranked 87th▼ 1· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)301.7Ranked 108th▼ 5· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure (PVT-D) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)49.9Ranked 52nd▼ 13· 2023
- Domestic private health expenditure (PVT-D) per capita in US$172.5Ranked 87th▼ 1· 2023
- DTP3 immunized, coverage among 1-year-olds (%)88Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Early Initiation of Breastfeeding, Children born in the last 24 months40.6Ranked 14th▼ 8· 2020
- ECON_GVT_EDU_EXP_PTGDP5.4Ranked 45th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_EXP_PTGDP20.2Ranked 50th· 2024
- ECON_GVT_REV_PTGDP23.4Ranked 67th· 2024
- ECON_ODA_INFLOW_PTGNI9.4Ranked 28th· 2024
- ECON_ODA_INFLOW_USD2,336.3Ranked 14th· 2024
- ECON_SOC_PRO_EXP_PTEXP0Ranked 107th· 2024
- ED_15-24_LR99.2Ranked 9th· 2020
- ED_ANAR_L0293.6Ranked 4th· 2020
- ED_ANAR_L197.8Ranked 2nd· 2020
- ED_ANAR_L295.1Ranked 1st· 2020
- ED_ANAR_L371.3Ranked 6th· 2020
- ED_CR_L199.5Ranked 2nd· 2020
- ED_CR_L286Ranked 5th· 2020
- ED_CR_L362.4Ranked 4th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L02_ADM31.6Ranked 18th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L11.4Ranked 7th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L1_ADM4.7Ranked 25th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L23.8Ranked 5th· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L2_ADM3.1Ranked 33rd· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L321.6Ranked 3rd· 2020
- ED_ROFST_L3_ADM23.5Ranked 27th· 2020
- Egg and/or Flesh Food Consumption 6-23 months65.5Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2020
- Escherichia coli77.3Ranked 41st▲ 4· 2023
- Estimated HIV in incident tuberculosis0%Ranked 103rd▼ 1· 2024
- Estimated incidence of all forms of tuberculosis0.29Ranked 150th▼ 2· 2024
- Estimated maternal deaths29.6Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal deaths29.6Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Estimated mortality from all forms of tuberculosis per 100,000 population0.04Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2024
- Estimated number of deaths from all forms of tuberculosis2Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- Estimated number of deaths from all forms of tuberculosis2Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2024
- Estimated number of MDR/RR-TB incident cases0Ranked 115th▲ 3· 2024
- Estimated number of new cases of all forms of tuberculosis16Ranked 131st—· 2024
- Estimated number of road traffic deaths239Ranked 44th· 2021
- Estimated polio cases0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Estimated road traffic death rate (per 100 000 population)4.7Ranked 20th· 2021
- Estimate of current cigarette smoking prevalence (%)31.1Ranked 6th▼ 8· 2030
- Estimate of current cigarette smoking prevalence (%) (age-standardized)32.1Ranked 8th▼ 7· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco smoking prevalence (%)36.5Ranked 7th▼ 8· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco smoking prevalence (%) (age-standardized)37.6Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%)37.3Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2030
- Estimate of current tobacco use prevalence (%) (age-standardized)38.1Ranked 4th▼ 7· 2030
- Estimates of rates of homicides per 100 000 population6.8Ranked 124th▲ 2· 2021
- Ever breastfed95.9Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2020
- Exclusive breastfeeding (% of children under 6 months)38.9Ranked 6th▼ 20· 2020
- Exclusive breastfeeding (% of children under 6 months)38.9%Ranked 6th▼ 20· 2020
- Exclusive breastfeeding under six months38.9Ranked 11th▼ 11· 2020
- Exclusive breastfeeding under six months (in thousands)28.2Ranked 11th▼ 12· 2020
- Exclusively breastfed for the first two days after birth59.3Ranked 9th▼ 11· 2020
- Extensively drug-resistant0Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2019
- Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education (%)68%Ranked 31st· 2022
- External health expenditure (EXT) as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)8.7Ranked 64th▲ 9· 2023
- External health expenditure (EXT) per capita in US$29.9Ranked 22nd▲ 9· 2023
- External health expenditure (% of current health expenditure)8.7Ranked 64th▲ 9· 2023
- External health expenditure per capita (current US$)29.9Ranked 22nd▲ 9· 2023
- External health expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)52.3Ranked 37th▲ 16· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth71.5Ranked 156th▲ 67· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth71.5Ranked 156th▲ 67· 2023
- Female life expectancy at birth71.5Ranked 156th▲ 67· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- GN_FB_BNK_ACCSS34Ranked 48th▼ 13· 2021
- GN_IDX51Ranked 16th· 2023
- GN_IT_MOB_OWN79Ranked 13th▼ 5· 2022
- GN_SG_LGL_GENEQEMP30Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2022
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at age 60 (years)13.5Ranked 100th▲ 9· 2021
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years)62.9Ranked 92nd▲ 14· 2021
- Healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth (years) - Sex: both sexes62.9Ranked 92nd▲ 14· 2021
- Hepatitis B (HepB3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Hib (Hib3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2025
- HIV-positive0Ranked 97th—· 2024
- Hospital beds (per 10 000 population)13Ranked 89th▼ 4· 2022
- Hospital beds (per 1,000 people)1.3Ranked 82nd▼ 5· 2022
- Hospital beds (per 1,000 people)1.3Ranked 82nd▼ 5· 2022
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for cigarette packaging?1Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for other smoked tobacco packaging?1Ranked 19th—· 2022
- How many health warnings are approved by the law for smokeless tobacco packaging?1Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2022
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, female (scale 0–50)42.9Ranked 135th▲ 70· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, male (scale 0–50)36.6Ranked 164th▲ 112· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): health pillar score, total (scale 0–50)39.6Ranked 151st▲ 96· 2025
- Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, age-standardized39.1Ranked 60th▲ 5· 2019
- Hypertension among adults aged 30-79 years, prevalence, crude33.9Ranked 85th▼ 12· 2019
- Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%)51.3Ranked 95th▲ 4· 2019
- Hypertension: diagnosis coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)47.3Ranked 98th▲ 1· 2019
- Hypertension effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension )among adults aged 30-79, age-standardized (%)19.1Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2019
- Hypertension: effective treatment coverage (controlled hypertension) among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)17.7Ranked 76th▼ 3· 2019
- Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, age-standardized (%)48.8Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2019
- Hypertension treatment coverage among adults aged 30-79 with hypertension, crude (%)44.5Ranked 76th▼ 3· 2019
- IM_MCV299Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Immunization, DPT (% of children ages 12-23 months)88Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Immunization, HepB3 (% of one-year-old children)91Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Inactivated first-dose polio vaccine (IPV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%) (WUENIC)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100 000 population) (HIV-positive cases)0Ranked 115th▲ 3· 2023
- Incidence of tuberculosis (per 100 000 population per year)0.29Ranked 144th▼ 4· 2024
- Increase in mean male height (%)7%Ranked 59th· 1996
- Indicator 16.2.1: Proportion of children aged 1-17 years who experienced any physical punishment and/or psychological aggression by caregivers in the past month90.1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Inequality in life expectancy0.18Ranked 140th▲ 52· 2023
- Inequality in life expectancy (Atkinson index)0.18Ranked 140th▲ 52· 2023
- Infant deaths2,468Ranked 100th▲ 1· 2024
- Infant mortality1.7Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2024
- Infant mortality rate1.6%Ranked 124th▲ 1· 2024
- Infant mortality rate1.7%Ranked 121st▲ 3· 2024
- Infant mortality rate1.8%Ranked 118th▲ 2· 2024
- Infant mortality rate1.4%Ranked 125th▲ 11· 2023
- Infants exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life (%)38.9Ranked 5th▼ 17· 2020
- Introduction of solid, semi-solid or soft foods 6-8 months89.9Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
- Japanese encephalitis - number of reported cases0Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2025
- Latest year of wild polio case1,988Ranked 21st· 2023
- Life expectancy65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at 1512Ranked 2nd▼ 114· 2023
- Life expectancy at 1587.8Ranked 87th▼ 1· 2100
- Life expectancy at 456.1Ranked 22nd▼ 60· 2023
- Life expectancy at 807.9Ranked 106th▲ 7· 2023
- Life expectancy at age 60 (years)18.2Ranked 92nd▲ 10· 2021
- Life expectancy at birth59.7Ranked 206th▲ 135· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth11.8Ranked 2nd▼ 119· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth11.8Ranked 2nd▼ 119· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth11.8Ranked 2nd▼ 119· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 132· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth87.5Ranked 89th—· 2100
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 132· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth71.5Ranked 156th▲ 67· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth (years)73.5Ranked 71st▲ 2· 2021
- Life expectancy at birth (years) - Sex: both sexes73.5Ranked 71st▲ 2· 2021
- Lifespan inequality0.17Ranked 186th▲ 103· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (%)0.05%Ranked 83rd▲ 3· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (%)0.05Ranked 83rd▲ 3· 2023
- Lifetime risk of maternal death (1 in: rate varies by country)1,864Ranked 105th▲ 1· 2023
- Lives saved due to ART170.5Ranked 97th▼ 3· 2024
- Long-run childhood stunting rates7.6%Ranked 89th▼ 13· 2015
- Low-birthweight babies (% of births)10.4%Ranked 74th▼ 3· 2020
- Low-birthweight babies (% of births)10.4Ranked 74th▼ 3· 2020
- Low birth weight number (in thousands)15Ranked 73rd—· 2020
- Low birth weight prevalence (%)10.4Ranked 53rd—· 2020
- Male life expectancy at birth59.7Ranked 206th▲ 135· 2023
- Male life expectancy at birth59.7Ranked 206th▲ 135· 2023
- Male-to-female height ratio1.1Ranked 33rd—· 1996
- Maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2020
- Maternal mortality ratio (national estimate, per 100,000 live births)19.1Ranked 10th· 2019
- Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)16.1Ranked 63rd▲ 7· 2023
- Maternal mortality ratio (per 100 000 live births)16.1Ranked 63rd▲ 7· 2023
- Mean female height (cm)158.8Ranked 103rd—· 1996
- Mean hemoglobin level of children aged 6-59 months115Ranked 11th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of non-pregnant women (aged 15-49 years)127Ranked 9th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of pregnant women (aged 15-49 years)115Ranked 9th—· 2019
- Mean hemoglobin level of women of reproductive age (aged 15-49 years)126Ranked 10th—· 2019
- Mean male height (cm)172.1Ranked 82nd—· 1996
- Mean male height (cm)172.1Ranked 82nd—· 1996
- Measles-containing-vaccine first-dose (MCV1) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) immunization coverage by the nationally recommended age (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Measles - number of reported cases0Ranked 110th▲ 9· 2025
- Measles - number of reported cases3Ranked 101st▲ 49· 2023
- Measles second-dose coverage89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Men172.1Ranked 82nd—· 1996
- Men22.3%Ranked 67th▼ 15· 2021
- MG_INTNL_MG_CNTRY_DEST272,481Ranked 106th▲ 4· 2024
- Minimum Acceptable Diet 6-23 months31.2Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2020
- Minimum dietary diversity 6-23 months44.7Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2020
- Minimum Meal Frequency 6-23 months71.3Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2020
- MNCH_CSEC25.8Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2020
- MNCH_INSTDEL99.4Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- MNCH_LIFE_EXPECTANCY74.3Ranked 58th▼ 19· 2024
- MNCH_LTR_MATERNAL_DEATH1,864Ranked 105th▲ 1· 2023
- MNCH_MATERNAL_DEATHS23.6Ranked 59th▼ 2· 2023
- MNCH_MMR16.1Ranked 132nd▼ 7· 2023
- MNCH_UHC65Ranked 27th—· 2023
- MNCH_UHC_RMNCH74Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70 (%)18.3%Ranked 62nd▲ 7· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70 (%)18.3Ranked 62nd▲ 7· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70, female (%)14.5Ranked 53rd▼ 4· 2021
- Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD between exact ages 30 and 70, male (%)22.3Ranked 70th▲ 6· 2021
- Mortality rate among children ages 10 to 14 years (per 1000 children aged 10)1.8Ranked 107th—· 2020
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, female (per 100,000 female population)0.09Ranked 29th▼ 5· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning, male (per 100,000 male population)0.2Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100 000 population)0.14Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisoning (per 100,000 population)0.14Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population)0.1Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate attributed to unintentional poisonings, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population) - Both sexes0.1Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2021
- Mortality rate, neonatal (per 1,000 live births)8.9Ranked 61st▲ 2· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5, female (per 1,000 live births)36.7Ranked 121st▼ 4· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5, male (per 1,000 live births)39Ranked 110th—· 2024
- Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000 live births)37.9Ranked 115th▼ 6· 2024
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported22Ranked 78th—· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in PPP$11.6Ranked 21st▲ 6· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates6.5Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - ad valorem excise0.34Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - import duties0Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - other taxes0Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - specific excise0.45Ranked 19th▼ 10· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - total tax0.93Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Most sold brand of cigarettes - taxes as a % of price - value added tax0.14Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2020
- Mumps - number of reported cases616Ranked 24th▼ 50· 2025
- National smoking ban: NUMBER OF PLACES SMOKE-FREE8Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Natural population growth rate2%Ranked 47th▲ 24· 2023
- Neonatal deaths1,294Ranked 84th▼ 4· 2024
- Neonatal deaths1,294Ranked 84th▼ 4· 2024
- Neonatal deaths800Ranked 89th▼ 5· 2019
- Neonatal mortality rate0.89%Ranked 103rd▼ 1· 2024
- Neonatal mortality rate (per 1000 live births) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 0-27 days0.87Ranked 98th▲ 2· 2023
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2025
- Neonatal tetanus - number of reported cases per million0Ranked 44th▼ 10· 2024
- New and relapse cases100%Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2023
- New cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)0Ranked 57th▼ 6· 2024
- New HIV infections173.7Ranked 105th▼ 4· 2024
- New infections of HIV per 1,000 people0.67Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2024
- New or unknown treatment history cases: Pulmonary, bacteriologically confirmed12Ranked 162nd▼ 13· 2023
- Non-polio AFP rate1.7Ranked 88th▲ 6· 2023
- NT_ANE_WOM_15_49_MOD24.8Ranked 86th▲ 4· 2023
- NT_ANT_HAZ_NE2_MOD8Ranked 103rd▼ 2· 2024
- NT_ANT_HAZ_NE2_MOD_NUMTH57.2Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2024
- NT_ANT_WHZ_PO2_MOD8.8Ranked 47th▼ 5· 2024
- NT_ANT_WHZ_PO2_MOD_NUMTH63.2Ranked 75th▲ 2· 2024
- NT_BF_EBF95.9Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2020
- NT_BF_EIBF40.6Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2020
- NT_BF_EXBF_2D59.3Ranked 9th▼ 11· 2020
- NT_BW_LBW10.4Ranked 74th▼ 3· 2020
- NT_BW_WEI98.5Ranked 17th▲ 12· 2019
- NT_CF_ISSSF_FL89.9Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
- NT_DANT_BMI_G25_MOD68.8Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2022
- NT_DANT_BMI_G30_MOD_ADJ37.6Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2022
- NT_DANT_BMI_L18_MOD3.2Ranked 99th—· 2022
- NT_IOD_ANY_TH95.7Ranked 1st▼ 10· 2020
- NT_IOD_ANY_TS97.1Ranked 1st▼ 13· 2020
- Number of children who die before age 53,821Ranked 78th▼ 16· 2023
- Number of children who die before age 53,821Ranked 78th▼ 16· 2023
- Number of children who die before age 53,821Ranked 78th▼ 16· 2023
- Number of clinical trials7Ranked 58th▲ 1· 2024
- Number of daily smokers - both (IHME, GHDx (2012))520,680Ranked 118th▼ 1· 2012
- Number of deaths ages 10-14 years4,255Ranked 139th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 15-19 years4,162Ranked 143rd▲ 8· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 20-24 years4,104Ranked 132nd▼ 6· 2024
- Number of deaths ages 5-9 years4,089Ranked 124th▼ 16· 2024
- Number of deaths among children ages 10 to 14 years217Ranked 60th▲ 2· 2021
- Number of deaths due to tuberculosis, excluding HIV2Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Number of deaths rate due to road traffic injuries239Ranked 44th· 2021
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases16Ranked 127th▲ 1· 2024
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases, (HIV-positive cases)0Ranked 105th▼ 13· 2024
- Number of incident tuberculosis cases in children aged 0 - 143Ranked 119th· 2024
- Number of infant deaths2,468Ranked 101st▲ 1· 2024
- Number of infant deaths - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 0 to 11 months2,084%Ranked 91st▲ 5· 2023
- Number of infants144,321Ranked 97th—· 2023
- Number of infants who die before age 1284Ranked 93rd▲ 1· 2100
- Number of infants who die before age 12,076Ranked 89th▼ 4· 2023
- Number of maternal deaths23.6Ranked 87th▲ 2· 2023
- Number of maternal deaths23.6Ranked 87th▲ 2· 2023
- Number of maternal deaths24Ranked 19th—· 2023
- Number of neonatal deaths1,294Ranked 85th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of neonatal deaths1,294Ranked 84th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of one-year-olds who are not vaccinated against rotavirus24,478.1Ranked 66th▼ 12· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not been vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae type b17,278.7Ranked 86th▼ 43· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not been vaccinated against rubella15,838.8Ranked 67th▼ 37· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the inactivated polio vaccine20,158.5Ranked 79th▼ 59· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the measles vaccine15,838.8Ranked 85th▼ 38· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine18,718.6Ranked 75th▼ 53· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had the third dose of the polio vaccine15,838.8Ranked 90th▼ 58· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine17,278.7Ranked 85th▼ 44· 2023
- Number of one-year-olds who have not had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine12,959Ranked 95th▼ 50· 2023
- Number of people who cannot afford a healthy diet300,000Ranked 80th▼ 7· 2024
- Number of people who cannot afford nutrient adequacy100,000Ranked 73rd· 2021
- Number of smoke-free public places8Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Number of under-five deaths5,544Ranked 113th▼ 8· 2024
- Number of under-five deaths5,544Ranked 112th▼ 8· 2024
- Number of underweight children15,231Ranked 21st▼ 17· 2020
- Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)2Ranked 116th▲ 24· 2018
- Nurses and midwives (per 1,000 people)2Ranked 116th▲ 24· 2018
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age37.4%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: female - Age group: 18+ years of age45.5%Ranked 28th—· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (age-standardized estimate) (%) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age28.3%Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2024
- Obesity among adults, BMI >= 30 kg/m2 (crude estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age33.2%Ranked 47th—· 2024
- Obesity in men28.3%Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2024
- Out-of-pocket expenditure as percentage of current health expenditure (CHE) (%)42.1Ranked 53rd▼ 16· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of current health expenditure)42.1Ranked 53rd▼ 16· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (% of current health expenditure)42.1%Ranked 53rd▼ 16· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) per capita in US$145.4Ranked 85th▼ 9· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita (current US$)145.4Ranked 85th▼ 9· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)254.3Ranked 104th▼ 9· 2023
- Out-of-pocket expenditure per capita, PPP (current international $)254.3Ranked 104th▼ 9· 2023
- Overall compliance with bans on direct advertising (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Overall compliance with bans on promotion and sponsorship (score)8Ranked 3rd· 2022
- Overall compliance with regulations on smoke-free environments (score)0Ranked 11th· 2022
- Overweight among children and adolescents, BMI-for-age > +1 standard deviations above the median (crude estimate) (%) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 5-19 years of age28.2%Ranked 84th▼ 4· 2024
- Overweight in men63.2%Ranked 63rd▲ 3· 2024
- Overweight numbers among children under 5 years of age (thousands), model-based estimates63.2Ranked 75th▲ 2· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), model-based estimates8.8Ranked 33rd▼ 6· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), model-based estimates - Sex: both sexes8.8%Ranked 33rd▼ 6· 2024
- Overweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height >+2 SD), survey-based estimates8.6Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- People practicing open defecation (% of population)0.13Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2024
- People practicing open defecation, rural (% of rural population)0.58Ranked 70th▼ 3· 2024
- People practicing open defecation, urban (% of urban population)0Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- People using at least basic drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- People using at least basic drinking water services, urban (% of urban population)98.4Ranked 50th—· 2024
- People using at least basic sanitation services, rural (% of rural population)98.7Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2024
- People using at least basic sanitation services, urban (% of urban population)99.6Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- People using safely managed drinking water services (% of population)80.6Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2024
- People using safely managed drinking water services, rural (% of rural population)76.4Ranked 14th—· 2024
- People using safely managed drinking water services, urban (% of urban population)81.9Ranked 31st—· 2024
- People using safely managed sanitation services (% of population)73.5Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2024
- People using safely managed sanitation services, rural (% of rural population)32.6Ranked 66th—· 2024
- People using safely managed sanitation services, urban (% of urban population)85.1Ranked 28th—· 2024
- People with basic handwashing facilities including soap and water (% of population)94.9Ranked 14th—· 2024
- People with basic handwashing facilities including soap and water, rural (% of rural population)95.5Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2024
- People with basic handwashing facilities including soap and water, urban (% of urban population)94.7Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2024
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)46.2Ranked 31st▼ 7· 2021
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to 3rd-generation cephalosporin (e.g., ESBL- E. coli) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)46.2%Ranked 31st▼ 7· 2021
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)73.3Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2021
- Percentage of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among patients seeking care and whose blood sample is taken and tested (%)73.3%Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2021
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of cigarette packaging0Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of other smoked tobacco packaging0Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - back of smokeless tobacco packaging0Ranked 16th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of cigarette packaging10Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of other smoked tobacco packaging10Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front and back of smokeless tobacco packaging10Ranked 20th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of cigarette packaging20Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of other smoked tobacco packaging20Ranked 14th—· 2022
- Percentage of principal display area mandated to be covered by health warnings - front of smokeless tobacco packaging20Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Pertussis - number of reported cases16Ranked 87th▼ 19· 2025
- Physicians (per 1,000 people)2.2Ranked 68th▼ 14· 2018
- Pneumoccocal conjugate vaccines (PCV3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)99Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Polio (Pol3) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)98Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Pregnant women receiving prenatal care (%)98.7%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Pregnant women receiving prenatal care (%)98.7Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Pregnant women with anemia31.9%Ranked 62nd▲ 1· 2023
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in currency reported27Ranked 84th· 2020
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in international dollars14.3Ranked 16th· 2020
- Premium brand of cigarettes - price in US$ at official exchange rates7.9Ranked 25th· 2020
- Preterm birth (number)19,040Ranked 52nd—· 2020
- Preterm birth rate (per 100 live births)13.2Ranked 4th—· 2020
- Prevalence of anemia among non-pregnant women (% of women ages 15-49)24.3Ranked 88th▲ 5· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%)31.9%Ranked 62nd▲ 1· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among pregnant women (%)31.9Ranked 62nd▲ 1· 2023
- Prevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women ages 15-49)24.8Ranked 86th▲ 4· 2023
- Prevalence of current cigarette smoking among adolescents (%)17.5Ranked 2nd· 2016
- Prevalence of current smokeless tobacco use among adolescents (%)6Ranked 2nd· 2016
- Prevalence of current tobacco smoking among adolescents (%)28.1Ranked 1st· 2016
- Prevalence of current tobacco use among adolescents (%)31.3Ranked 2nd· 2016
- Prevalence of current tobacco use, females (% of female adults)10.7Ranked 51st▼ 5· 2024
- Prevalence of current tobacco use, males (% of male adults)60.3Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Prevalence of hypertension in adults aged 30-7939.1Ranked 60th▲ 5· 2019
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, female (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)8.2Ranked 34th▼ 5· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, female (% of children under 5)6.9Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, male (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)9.4Ranked 34th▼ 5· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height, male (% of children under 5)10.2Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2020
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)8.8Ranked 33rd▼ 6· 2024
- Prevalence of overweight, weight for height (% of children under 5)8.6Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Prevalence of severe wasting, weight for height, female (% of children under 5)0.6Ranked 9th▼ 14· 2020
- Prevalence of severe wasting, weight for height, male (% of children under 5)0.7Ranked 13th▼ 13· 2020
- Prevalence of severe wasting, weight for height (% of children under 5)0.6Ranked 10th▼ 16· 2020
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, female (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)7.6Ranked 92nd—· 2024
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, female (% of children under 5)8.8Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2020
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, male (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)8.4Ranked 92nd▼ 2· 2024
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age, male (% of children under 5)8.6Ranked 19th▼ 17· 2020
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age (modeled estimate, % of children under 5)8Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- Prevalence of stunting, height for age (% of children under 5)8.7Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2020
- Prevalence of stunting, male (% of children under 5)8.6%Ranked 19th▼ 17· 2020
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age, female (% of children under 5)1.6Ranked 20th▼ 21· 2020
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age, male (% of children under 5)2.6Ranked 18th▼ 24· 2020
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age (% of children under 5)2.1Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2020
- Prevalence of underweight, weight for age (% of children under 5)2.1%Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2020
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height, female (% of children under 5)1.3Ranked 18th▼ 14· 2020
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height, male (% of children under 5)1.3Ranked 18th▼ 18· 2020
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height (% of children under 5)1.3Ranked 19th▼ 21· 2020
- Prevalence of wasting, weight for height (% of children under 5)1.3%Ranked 19th▼ 21· 2020
- Prevalence of zinc deficiency (Wessells et al. (2012))15.3%Ranked 72nd▼ 8· 2005
- preventable deaths from rotavirus5Ranked 6th· 2016
- Preventive treatment30Ranked 14th· 2019
- Previously treated cases tested for RR-/MDR-TB (%)0Ranked 62nd▼ 14· 2019
- Primary health care expenditure (PHCE) per сapita in US$178.8Ranked 39th▼ 5· 2023
- Private health expenditure per person301.7Ranked 108th▼ 5· 2023
- Probability of dying among adolescents ages 10-14 years (per 1,000)31.8Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Probability of dying among adolescents ages 15-19 years (per 1,000)36.2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Probability of dying among children ages 5-9 years (per 1,000)28.1Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Probability of dying among youth ages 20-24 years (per 1,000)41.2Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Proportion of all cancer deaths among all individuals attributable to alcohol consumption0.7%Ranked 8th· 2020
- Proportion of all cancers but non-melanoma skin cancer (c00-97, but c44) cases among all individuals attributable to helicobacter pylori2.4%Ranked 115th· 2020
- Proportion of births attended by skilled health personnel (%)99.7Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2020
- Proportion of births delivered in a health facility (Facility births) (%)99.4Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of bloodstream infection due to Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins (%)45.4Ranked 44th▲ 12· 2023
- Proportion of bloodstream infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (%)11.4Ranked 67th▲ 60· 2023
- Proportion of children moderately or severely overweight (%) - Both sexes8.8%Ranked 32nd▼ 6· 2024
- Proportion of population facing financial hardship due to out-of-pocket health expenditure (%)22.3Ranked 5th▼ 15· 2023
- Proportion of population facing impoverishing out-of-pocket health expenditure, based on the societal poverty line (%)18.8Ranked 14th▼ 21· 2023
- Proportion of population facing large (but non-impoverishing) out-of-pocket health expenditure (%)3.5Ranked 9th▼ 15· 2023
- Proportion of population with large household expenditures on health (greater than 10%) as a share of total household expenditure or income (%)9%Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2016
- Proportion of population with large household expenditures on health (greater than 25%) as a share of total household expenditure or income (%)1.5%Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2016
- Proportion of the population with positive out-of-pocket household expenditure on health exceeding 40% of household discretionary budget, by location, quintile, type of household and characteristics of the head of household (%)22.3Ranked 5th▼ 15· 2023
- Proportion of the target population who received 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3) vaccine (%)88Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Proportion of the target population who received a 3rd dose of pneumococcal conjugate (PCV3) vaccine (%)87Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Proportion of the target population who received measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2) (%)89Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Proportion of vaccination cards seen (%)92.8Ranked 8th· 2018
- PT_ADLT_PS_NEC20Ranked 5th· 2020
- PT_F_TMRD1538,100Ranked 79th· 2023
- PT_F_TMRD18338,400Ranked 62nd· 2023
- Public expenditure on health per capita (current international $)250.4Ranked 126th▼ 1· 2023
- PV_CHLD_INCM-PL33.5Ranked 53rd· 2020
- PV_VMIR0.74Ranked 6th· 2017
- Rotavirus vaccines completed dose (RotaC) immunization coverage among 1-year-olds (%)83Ranked 17th▲ 14· 2025
- Rubella - number of reported cases0Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2025
- School life expectancy in primary education, adjusted gender parity index0.99Ranked 100th—· 2023
- SDG 6.3.1 Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)71.5Ranked 49th· 2024
- Self-reported life satisfaction4.7Ranked 106th▲ 1· 2025
- Severe wasted prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height <-3 SD), survey-based estimates0.6Ranked 10th▼ 16· 2020
- Share of adult men that are overweight59.2%Ranked 93rd▲ 5· 2024
- Share of adults34.8%Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: both sexes - Age group: 18+ years of age68.5%Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2024
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: female - Age group: 18+ years of age73.3%Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of adults who are overweight (age-standardized) - Sex: male - Age group: 18+ years of age63.2%Ranked 63rd▲ 3· 2024
- Share of adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)34.8%Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2022
- Share of children fully vaccinated against measles89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Share of children fully vaccinated against measles89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Share of children who are stunted8.7%Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2020
- Share of female adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)10.1%Ranked 56th▼ 9· 2022
- Share of male adults who smoke or use tobacco (age-standardized)59.4%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2022
- Share of men59.4%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2022
- Share of mothers aged 20-44 who have lost an infant7.5Ranked 15th· 2016
- Share of new all cancers but non-melanoma skin cancer (c00-97, but c44) cases among all individuals attributable to all infectious agents8.2%Ranked 132nd· 2020
- Share of newborns vaccinated against tuberculosis87%Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against Haemophilus influenzae type b88%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against rotavirus83%Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds vaccinated against rubella89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had one dose of the measles vaccine89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had one dose of the measles vaccine89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the one dose of the inactivated polio vaccine86%Ranked 14th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine87%Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had the third dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine87%Ranked 13th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine88%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine88%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine88%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine88%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine88%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine91%Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the hepatitis B vaccine91%Ranked 9th—· 2024
- Share of one-year-olds who have had three doses of the polio vaccine89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Share of population covered by health insurance16.2%Ranked 4th· 2004
- Share of population covered by health insurance (ILO (2014))16.2%Ranked 4th· 2004
- Share of population deprived in the indicator Nutrition6.7%Ranked 18th· 2019
- Share of positive results among the diagnostic tests performed using molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostics100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of the population who cannot afford a healthy diet5.9%Ranked 98th▼ 17· 2024
- Share of the population who cannot afford nutrient adequacy2.4%Ranked 113th· 2021
- Share that agrees vaccines are effective86%Ranked 13th· 2015
- Share that agrees vaccines are important for children88%Ranked 13th· 2015
- Share that agrees vaccines are safe88%Ranked 11th· 2015
- Share that disagrees vaccines are safe10%Ranked 19th· 2015
- Share that disagree that vaccines are effective11%Ranked 10th· 2015
- Share that disagree that vaccines are important for children to have9%Ranked 8th· 2015
- Share who are stunted8.7%Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2020
- SPP_GDPPC3,367.6Ranked 153rd· 2024
- SPP_GINI33.7Ranked 43rd· 2024
- SPP_HSLD_INCOME_SHARE7.3Ranked 29th· 2024
- SPP_MOTHERS_CASH_BNF7Ranked 1st· 2018
- SPP_PALMA1.3Ranked 83rd· 2024
- SPP_VMI0.74Ranked 6th· 2017
- Stillbirth rate0.91%Ranked 83rd▼ 3· 2023
- Stillbirth rate (per 1000 total births)9.1Ranked 83rd▼ 3· 2023
- Stunting numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates57.2Ranked 91st—· 2024
- Stunting numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates - Sex: both sexes57,200Ranked 91st—· 2024
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), model-based estimates8Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates8.7Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2020
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates - Sex: both sexes8.7%Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2020
- Suicide mortality rate, by sex (deaths per 100,000 population)0.7Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2021
- Suicide mortality rate, female (per 100,000 female population)0.23Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2021
- Suicide mortality rate, male (per 100,000 male population)1.1Ranked 6th—· 2021
- Support to help quit smoking3Ranked 3rd—· 2022
- Tax structure: Excise tax proportion of price70.9Ranked 6th—· 2022
- TB patients with known HIV status (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Tobacco tax revenues - import duties0Ranked 4th· 2015
- Tobacco tax revenues - other0Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2015
- Tobacco tax structure: Price dispersion: Share of cheapest brand price in premium brand price (%) (the higher the % the smaller the gap)28.6Ranked 118th· 2022
- Total number of national DHS surveys conducted0Ranked 14th· 2025
- Total official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors, gross disbursement, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)152Ranked 21st▲ 4· 2024
- Total official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors, net disbursement, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)175.9MRanked 15th▼ 3· 2023
- Total official development assistance to medical research and basic health sectors, net disbursement, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)152Ranked 19th▲ 4· 2024
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Total polio cases per million0Ranked 26th▼ 1· 2023
- Total tetanus - number of reported cases0Ranked 53rd▼ 4· 2025
- Total use of antibacterials expressed as DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day29.1Ranked 11th▲ 8· 2023
- Treatment success rate for patients treated for MDR-TB (%)0Ranked 48th▲ 27· 2007
- Treatment success rate: HIV-positive TB cases0Ranked 53rd▲ 51· 2022
- Treatment success rate: new TB cases100Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2023
- Treatment success rate: previously treated TB cases100Ranked 1st· 2004
- TRGT_2030_NT_ANE_WOM_15_49_MOD12.1Ranked 76th· 2030
- TRGT_2030_NT_ANT_HAZ_NE2_MOD5.7Ranked 120th· 2030
- TRGT_2030_NT_BW_LBW6.9Ranked 87th· 2030
- Tuberculosis case detection rate (%, all forms)70Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence (per 100,000 population)0.29Ranked 150th▼ 2· 2024
- Tuberculosis incidence rate in males and females aged 0-4 years0Ranked 168th· 2024
- Tuberculosis - new and relapse cases11Ranked 173rd▼ 5· 2024
- Tuberculosis patients living with HIV receiving ART0Ranked 104th▼ 4· 2021
- Tuberculosis patients who tested positive for HIV0Ranked 115th▼ 2· 2021
- Tuberculosis-related deaths among people living with HIV0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Tuberculosis treatment coverage70Ranked 29th—· 2024
- Tuberculosis treatment success rate (% of new cases)100Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2023
- UHC service coverage index65Ranked 27th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage index65Ranked 27th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage index65Ranked 27th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1)65Ranked 27th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage Index (SDG 3.8.1)65Ranked 27th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on infectious diseases99Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on infectious diseases99Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on non-communicable diseases54Ranked 28th—· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on noncommunicable diseases54Ranked 28th—· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health74Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health74Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- UHC service coverage sub-index on service capacity and access45Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2023
- UHC Service Coverage sub-index on service capacity and access45Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2023
- Under-fifteen deaths13,888Ranked 132nd▼ 5· 2024
- Under-fifteen mortality rate9.5%Ranked 185th▼ 1· 2024
- Under-five deaths5,544Ranked 112th▼ 8· 2024
- Under-five probability of death1.2%Ranked 55th▼ 5· 2019
- Underweight1.5%Ranked 78th▼ 1· 2014
- Underweight1.6%Ranked 86th▲ 6· 2014
- Underweight prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates2.1Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2020
- Universal health coverage (UHC) service coverage index, 2025 methodology65Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Vaccine-derived poliovirus cases0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- "Vaccines are important for children"88%Ranked 13th· 2015
- Wasted numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates9,430Ranked 21st▼ 18· 2020
- Wasted numbers among children under 5 years of age (millions), model-based estimates9.4Ranked 21st▼ 18· 2020
- Wasting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% weight-for-height <-2 SD), survey-based estimates1.3Ranked 19th▼ 21· 2020
- Wild Poliovirus cases0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- WS_HCF_C-B33.4Ranked 14th—· 2023
- WS_HCF_C-L58.1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- WS_HCF_C-N8.5Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- WS_HCF_H-B86.7Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_H-L12.6Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2023
- WS_HCF_H-N0.78Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_S-B4.1Ranked 38th▼ 8· 2023
- WS_HCF_S-L93.1Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_S-N2.8Ranked 43rd▼ 5· 2023
- WS_HCF_W-B93.3Ranked 11th—· 2023
- WS_HCF_W-L4.1Ranked 36th▼ 6· 2023
- WS_HCF_WM-B57.5Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_WM-L33.9Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2023
- WS_HCF_WM-N8.6Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_HCF_W-N2.6Ranked 45th▼ 5· 2023
- WS_PPL_H-B94.9Ranked 14th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_H-L4.5Ranked 71st▼ 6· 2024
- WS_PPL_H-N0.57Ranked 69th▼ 6· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-ALB99.4Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-B25.9Ranked 46th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-DIS13.5Ranked 68th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-FST7.3Ranked 13th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-I99.7Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-L0.33Ranked 146th▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-LAT13.2Ranked 91st▼ 4· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-OD0.13Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-SEP31.9Ranked 42nd—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-SEW54.6Ranked 80th—· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-SM73.5Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-UI0.15Ranked 132nd▼ 6· 2024
- WS_PPL_S-WWT52.8Ranked 56th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-ALB98.8Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-AVA89Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-B18.1Ranked 74th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-I100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-L1.2Ranked 90th▼ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-NP47.1Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-P52.9Ranked 122nd▼ 4· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-PRE93.8Ranked 76th▲ 2· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-QUA80.6Ranked 80th▲ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-SM80.6Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-SW0Ranked 103rd▼ 5· 2024
- WS_PPL_W-UI0Ranked 169th▼ 4· 2024
- WS_SCH_H-B20.8Ranked 75th▼ 2· 2021
- WS_SCH_H-F100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- WS_SCH_H-L77.7Ranked 2nd—· 2021
- WS_SCH_H-N1.1Ranked 39th▼ 7· 2023
- WS_SCH_S-B97.2Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- WS_SCH_S-I99.5Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- WS_SCH_S-L2.3Ranked 46th▼ 6· 2023
- WS_SCH_S-N0.51Ranked 50th▼ 5· 2023
- WS_SCH_W-B100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- WS_SCH_W-I100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- WS_SCH_W-L0Ranked 53rd▼ 6· 2023
- WS_SCH_W-N0Ranked 75th▼ 4· 2023
- Year-on-year change in female height (%)-0.02Ranked 119th—· 1996
- Year-on-year change in male height (%)-0.04Ranked 133rd▼ 2· 1996
- Yellow fever - number of reported cases0Ranked 18th▲ 6· 2025
- DTP3 immunization coverage88%Ranked 12th—· 2024
- Measles (MCV1) immunization coverage89%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Under-5 mortality rate37.9Ranked 152nd▼ 7· 2024
Education
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2100UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2100Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2100
Secondary enrollment
- Secondary enrollment89.1%Ranked 92nd▼ 2· 2023
- Education spending5.4%Ranked 40th▼ 20· 2021
- Adult literacy97.9%Ranked 5th▼ 6· 2024
- Primary enrollment91.4%Ranked 139th—· 2023
- Tertiary enrollment44.5%Ranked 76th—· 2023
- Primary completion rate91.2%Ranked 94th▲ 5· 2023
- Expected years of schooling13Ranked 113th▲ 9· 2023
- Mean years of schooling10.1Ranked 89th—· 2023
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, primary education or less (% of population ages 15+)34.6Ranked 106th▲ 7· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, secondary education or more (% of population ages 15+)40.7Ranked 134th▲ 20· 2024
- Adjusted gender parity index for participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age), (ratio)1Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th▼ 28· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.94Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (%)93.8%Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, female (%)95%Ranked 7th▼ 9· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.94Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 8· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)94.2%Ranked 6th▼ 8· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, fourth quintile, female (%)95.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, fourth quintile, male (%)93.1%Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, male (%)92.7%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.95Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 18· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, middle quintile, both sexes (%)93.3%Ranked 6th▼ 15· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, middle quintile, female (%)94.5%Ranked 2nd▼ 10· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 4th—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, middle quintile, male (%)92.2%Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 4th—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 13· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)90.5%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, poorest quintile, female (%)92.1%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, poorest quintile, male (%)89.5%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 17· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, richest quintile, both sexes (%)96.4%Ranked 5th▼ 14· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, richest quintile, female (%)98.5%Ranked 1st▼ 14· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, richest quintile, male (%)94.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 7· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th▼ 14· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.95Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, both sexes (%)93.9%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, female (%)94.5%Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)95.3%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)93.6%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)96.5%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, male (%)93.3%Ranked 7th—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.93Ranked 1st· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 16· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)89.2%Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, middle quintile, female (%)91.1%Ranked 2nd▼ 8· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, middle quintile, male (%)86.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)92.8%Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)67.1%Ranked 4th· 2010
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)91.4%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)98%Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, richest quintile, female (%)98%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, richest quintile, male (%)98%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)96.9%Ranked 5th▼ 15· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, second quintile, female (%)98.6%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, rural, second quintile, male (%)94.6%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 10· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, second quintile, both sexes (%)95%Ranked 5th▼ 8· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, second quintile, female (%)94.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, second quintile, male (%)95.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 4th· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th▼ 22· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.94Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, both sexes (%)93.7%Ranked 9th▼ 7· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, female (%)95.1%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.93Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)93.7%Ranked 6th▼ 7· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)95.8%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)91.5%Ranked 1st▼ 7· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, male (%)92.6%Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.95Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 1st▼ 10· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)95.1%Ranked 3rd▼ 16· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, middle quintile, female (%)96.4%Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, middle quintile, male (%)94%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)90.1%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)91.6%Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)89.2%Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd▼ 15· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)95.9%Ranked 5th▼ 11· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, richest quintile, female (%)98.6%Ranked 1st▼ 15· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, richest quintile, male (%)93.5%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)94.7%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, second quintile, female (%)93.5%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net attendance rate, one year before the official primary entry age, urban, second quintile, male (%)95.8%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary, female (% of primary school age children)97.3Ranked 7th▼ 14· 2018
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary, male (% of primary school age children)97Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2018
- Adjusted net enrollment rate, primary (% of primary school age children)97.1Ranked 26th▼ 31· 2018
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (%)68.6%Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2023
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, female (%)70.1%Ranked 86th▼ 6· 2023
- Adjusted net enrolment rate, one year before the official primary entry age, male (%)67.3%Ranked 89th▼ 5· 2023
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of lower secondary education in mathematics (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of lower secondary education in reading (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of primary in mathematics (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally-representative learning assessment at the end of primary in reading (number)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally representative learning assessment in Grade 2 or 3 in mathematics (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Administration of a nationally representative learning assessment in Grade 2 or 3 in reading (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Adolescents out of school, female (% of female lower secondary school age)5.3Ranked 67th▲ 2· 2023
- Adolescents out of school, male (% of male lower secondary school age)6.7Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2023
- Adolescents out of school (% of lower secondary school age)6Ranked 71st—· 2023
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, both sexes (number)70,237Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, % female76Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, female (number)53,518Ranked 12th▼ 8· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, male (number)16,719Ranked 14th▼ 6· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, both sexes (number)14,583Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, % female79Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, female (number)11,467Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, rural, male (number)3,117Ranked 12th▼ 5· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, both sexes (number)55,654Ranked 8th▼ 8· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, % female76Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, female (number)42,052Ranked 8th▼ 7· 2022
- Adult illiterate population, 15+ years, urban, male (number)13,602Ranked 10th▼ 6· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, both sexes (%)97.9%Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, female (%)96.8%Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, male (%)99.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2024
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, both sexes (%)97.1%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, female (%)95.4%Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, rural, male (%)98.7%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, both sexes (%)98%Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, female (%)97%Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2022
- Adult literacy rate, population 15+ years, urban, male (%)99%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2022
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)92.9%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2021
- All staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)63.6%Ranked 37th· 2021
- All staff compensation as % of total expenditure in public institutions92.9%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2021
- Average teacher salary in lower secondary education relative to other professions requiring a comparable level of qualification, both sexes1.6Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2022
- Average teacher salary in pre-primary education relative to other professions requiring a comparable level of qualification, both sexes1.6Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2022
- Average teacher salary in primary education relative to other professions requiring a comparable level of qualification, both sexes1.6Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Average teacher salary in upper secondary education relative to other professions requiring a comparable level of qualification, both sexes1.6Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2022
- Average years of schooling10.1Ranked 89th—· 2023
- Average years of schooling10.1Ranked 89th—· 2023
- Average years of schooling10.1Ranked 89th—· 2023
- Average years of schooling, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 11th▼ 15· 2022
- Average years of schooling among men10Ranked 93rd—· 2023
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)2.2%Ranked 71st▼ 2· 2021
- Capital expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)12.6%Ranked 22nd· 2021
- Children (13-15) who reported being in a physical fight during past year44%Ranked 27th· 2015
- Children out of school, female (% of female primary school age)9.9Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Children out of school, male (% of male primary school age)9.2Ranked 39th▲ 3· 2023
- Children out of school (% of primary school age)9.6Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Children out of school, primary53,793Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Children out of school, primary, female27,289Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2023
- Children out of school, primary, male26,504Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2023
- Completion rate in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 41st▲ 5· 2025
- Completion rate in primary education99.6%Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2025
- Completion rate in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 91st▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 12th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.1Ranked 41st▲ 5· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 25th▲ 18· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.91Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, both sexes (%)92.3%Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)94.8%Ranked 58th▼ 3· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, female (%)97.1%Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 8th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.97Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, female (modelled data) (%)99.7%Ranked 9th▼ 12· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 9th▲ 7· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)93.4%Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, female (%)97.3%Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, male (%)89.5%Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, male (%)87.8%Ranked 42nd▲ 7· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.86Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, male (modelled data) (%)89.9%Ranked 74th—· 2025
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, both sexes (%)91.5%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, female (%)97.4%Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, male (%)85.3%Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 7th· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)87.7%Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, female (%)95.5%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 6th· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, male (%)80.7%Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 5th· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, both sexes (%)96.2%Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, female (%)98.3%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, male (%)94.3%Ranked 14th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.93Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, both sexes (%)91.7%Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, female (%)96.5%Ranked 24th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.97Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)92.6%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)96%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)90%Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, male (%)87.3%Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.88Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)90.9%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, middle quintile, female (%)96.8%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, middle quintile, male (%)84.1%Ranked 8th—· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)87.6%Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)95.2%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)80.9%Ranked 9th▲ 8· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)94.5%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, richest quintile, female (%)98.1%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, richest quintile, male (%)91.5%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)91.4%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, second quintile, female (%)95.7%Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural, second quintile, male (%)85.9%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, both sexes (%)92%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, female (%)96.7%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, male (%)87.6%Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.91Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, both sexes (%)92.5%Ranked 36th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, female (%)97.2%Ranked 21st▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.97Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)93.8%Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)97.8%Ranked 4th▼ 10· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)89.3%Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, male (%)87.9%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.85Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)91.7%Ranked 9th—· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, middle quintile, female (%)97.6%Ranked 2nd▼ 9· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, middle quintile, male (%)85.7%Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)87.7%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)95.5%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)80.6%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)96.6%Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, richest quintile, female (%)98.3%Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, richest quintile, male (%)95.1%Ranked 13th▼ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)92.1%Ranked 6th—· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, second quintile, female (%)96.9%Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban, second quintile, male (%)87.8%Ranked 4th▼ 7· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 45th▲ 28· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1Ranked 91st▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 16th▲ 11· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 10th▼ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)99.6%Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, female (%)99.5%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 9th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, female (modelled data) (%)99.8%Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 12th—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, female (%)99.7%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, male (%)99.9%Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, male (%)99.4%Ranked 10th▼ 11· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, male (modelled data) (%)99.5%Ranked 39th▲ 3· 2025
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, female (%)99.7%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, male (%)99.2%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 20th▲ 9· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 9th· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)99.2%Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, female (%)99.2%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 6th· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, male (%)99.2%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 9th· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, both sexes (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd▼ 16· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, female (%)99.6%Ranked 3rd▼ 9· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 19· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, both sexes (%)99.4%Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, female (%)99.2%Ranked 16th▲ 7· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.98Ranked 4th· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)99.4%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)99.2%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)99.6%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, male (%)99.6%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 19th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, middle quintile, female (%)98.9%Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, middle quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 21st· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)99.1%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)97.8%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, richest quintile, female (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, richest quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)98.6%Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, second quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, rural, second quintile, male (%)97.9%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 10th—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, both sexes (%)99.1%Ranked 3rd—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, male (%)98.8%Ranked 5th—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 11th▼ 9· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, female (%)99.6%Ranked 11th▲ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 8· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, male (%)99.4%Ranked 9th▼ 14· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 12th—· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, middle quintile, female (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, middle quintile, male (%)98.9%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)99.2%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)99.1%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)99.7%Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, richest quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, richest quintile, male (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 17· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)99.2%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, second quintile, female (%)99.3%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, primary education, urban, second quintile, male (%)99%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.3Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 22nd▲ 15· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.63Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, both sexes (%)62.5%Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, both sexes (modelled data) (%)76.1%Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, female (%)73.3%Ranked 40th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.67Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, female (modelled data) (%)90.2%Ranked 43rd▼ 4· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)64.5%Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, female (%)77.2%Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, male (%)51.7%Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, male (%)51.6%Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.56Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, male (modelled data) (%)61.7%Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2025
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.83Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, both sexes (%)58.7%Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, female (%)70.2%Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.88Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, male (%)45.7%Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.86Ranked 9th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)47.5%Ranked 9th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, female (%)57.7%Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 6th· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, male (%)36%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.4Ranked 5th· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 7th▲ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, both sexes (%)74.9%Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, female (%)86.5%Ranked 15th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, male (%)64.2%Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.82Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, both sexes (%)61%Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, female (%)73%Ranked 30th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.75Ranked 1st· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 3rd—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)64.4%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)78.2%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)51%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, male (%)50.6%Ranked 37th▲ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.85Ranked 1st· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)51%Ranked 12th▲ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, female (%)63.6%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, male (%)41.1%Ranked 13th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 6th· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)56.9%Ranked 5th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)62.5%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)51%Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)69.6%Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, female (%)83.3%Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, male (%)59.7%Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)60.6%Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, female (%)73.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, male (%)50.5%Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, both sexes (%)63.8%Ranked 9th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, female (%)73.7%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, male (%)55.4%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.6Ranked 5th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, both sexes (%)62.9%Ranked 49th▲ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, female (%)73.4%Ranked 45th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.65Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)64.5%Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)76.8%Ranked 16th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)52.1%Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, male (%)52%Ranked 51st▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.49Ranked 1st—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)61.4%Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, female (%)72%Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, male (%)47.7%Ranked 17th—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)45.5%Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)56.6%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)32.5%Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)76.3%Ranked 18th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, female (%)87.3%Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, male (%)65.6%Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)64.4%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, female (%)73.7%Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2019
- Completion rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, male (%)56.3%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2019
- Compulsory education, duration (years)10Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Contraception usage42.8%Ranked 8th▼ 13· 2020
- Current education expenditure, tertiary (% of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions)87.4Ranked 57th· 2021
- Current education expenditure, total (% of total expenditure in public institutions)97.8Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2021
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)97.8%Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2021
- Current expenditure as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)87.4%Ranked 57th· 2021
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)4.9%Ranked 72nd▲ 11· 2021
- Current expenditure other than staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)23.9%Ranked 44th· 2021
- DEC alternative conversion factor (LCU per US$)1Ranked 130th▼ 2· 2024
- Duration of compulsory education10Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Duration of compulsory education (years)10Ranked 8th—· 2025
- Duration of pre-primary education2Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)26.1Ranked 15th▼ 26· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)19.5Ranked 16th▼ 26· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least Bachelor's or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)22.8Ranked 15th▼ 26· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)70.6Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)68.3Ranked 65th▲ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment, at least completed lower secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)69.5Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)32.4Ranked 12th▼ 20· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)24.8Ranked 15th▼ 24· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed post-secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)28.6Ranked 13th▼ 25· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, female (%) (cumulative)90.3Ranked 23rd▼ 24· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, male (%) (cumulative)93.6Ranked 21st▼ 19· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed primary, population 25+ years, total (%) (cumulative)92Ranked 23rd▼ 20· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)26.1Ranked 17th▼ 16· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)19.5Ranked 22nd▼ 13· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed short-cycle tertiary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)22.8Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)48.9Ranked 28th▼ 40· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)43Ranked 33rd▼ 46· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least completed upper secondary, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)45.9Ranked 32nd▼ 39· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)1.4Ranked 63rd▲ 5· 2022
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)2.4Ranked 16th▼ 37· 2024
- Educational attainment, at least Master's or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)2Ranked 16th▼ 40· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 28th▼ 10· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.94Ranked 8th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, both sexes (%)97.3%Ranked 15th▼ 13· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, female (%)95.7%Ranked 22nd▼ 11· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.91Ranked 10th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, male (%)98.8%Ranked 12th▼ 7· 2024
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 11th—· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.98Ranked 7th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.92Ranked 13th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)93.2%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, poorest quintile, female (%)89.5%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, poorest quintile, male (%)97.2%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.98Ranked 13th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, richest quintile, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, richest quintile, female (%)97.8%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, richest quintile, male (%)99.6%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 26th▲ 5· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)96%Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, female (%)93.6%Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, rural, male (%)98.3%Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 29th▲ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)97.3%Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, female (%)95.9%Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment: at least some primary (ISCED 1), population 25+ years, urban, male (%)98.8%Ranked 18th▲ 5· 2022
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, female (%) (cumulative)0.04Ranked 56th▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, male (%) (cumulative)0.41Ranked 12th▼ 26· 2024
- Educational attainment, Doctoral or equivalent, population 25+, total (%) (cumulative)0.23Ranked 15th▼ 31· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 9th▼ 27· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.39Ranked 1st· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)22.8%Ranked 16th▼ 25· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)26.1%Ranked 16th▼ 25· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.4Ranked 1st· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)19.5%Ranked 17th▼ 25· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.36Ranked 1st· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.2Ranked 4th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)12.7%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, female (%)13.9%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, male (%)11.4%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.1Ranked 6th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, both sexes (%)32.9%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, female (%)34.5%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, male (%)31.4%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 34th▲ 7· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)22.3%Ranked 15th—· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)24.6%Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)20%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 28th▲ 7· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)22.8%Ranked 37th—· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)24.3%Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Bachelor's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)21.4%Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.07Ranked 58th▼ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.33Ranked 18th▲ 14· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)0.23%Ranked 16th▼ 30· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, female (%)0.04%Ranked 56th▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.41Ranked 11th▲ 10· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, male (%)0.41%Ranked 13th▼ 25· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.32Ranked 17th▲ 14· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.09Ranked 25th▼ 8· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)0.12%Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)0.02%Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)0.22%Ranked 14th▼ 5· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.07Ranked 47th▼ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)0.37%Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)0.05%Ranked 46th▼ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Doctoral or equivalent education, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)0.68%Ranked 31st▼ 7· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)69.5%Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)70.6%Ranked 61st▲ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)68.3%Ranked 65th▲ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)67%Ranked 42nd▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)65.7%Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)68.2%Ranked 38th▼ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)69.9%Ranked 54th▲ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)71.5%Ranked 50th▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed lower secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)68.3%Ranked 58th▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.47Ranked 74th▲ 10· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.81Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)2%Ranked 17th▼ 39· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)1.4%Ranked 63rd▲ 5· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)2.4%Ranked 17th▼ 36· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.75Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 49th▲ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)1.3%Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)2.3%Ranked 32nd▼ 7· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.45Ranked 56th▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)2.3%Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)1.4%Ranked 54th▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed Master's or equivalent education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)3.1%Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 4th▼ 20· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 3rd—· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)28.6%Ranked 14th▼ 24· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)32.4%Ranked 13th▼ 19· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)24.8%Ranked 16th▼ 23· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.89Ranked 3rd—· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 25th▼ 5· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)27%Ranked 26th▲ 7· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)28.5%Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)25.5%Ranked 22nd▲ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 15th▼ 13· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)29.9%Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)31.2%Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed post-secondary non-tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)28.5%Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2021
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 32nd▼ 35· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 29th▼ 5· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.92Ranked 8th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)92%Ranked 23rd▼ 20· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)90.3%Ranked 23rd▼ 24· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.89Ranked 8th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)93.6%Ranked 21st▼ 19· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.95Ranked 6th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.92Ranked 12th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)89.7%Ranked 7th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, female (%)85.9%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, male (%)93.7%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.98Ranked 11th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, both sexes (%)97.8%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, female (%)96.8%Ranked 7th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, male (%)98.9%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)94.6%Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)91.7%Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)97.3%Ranked 28th▼ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 53rd▲ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)96.1%Ranked 35th▼ 8· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)94.4%Ranked 37th▼ 7· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed primary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)97.8%Ranked 34th▼ 7· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 4th▼ 38· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)22.8%Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)26.1%Ranked 17th▼ 16· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)19.5%Ranked 22nd▼ 13· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 35th▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)27.9%Ranked 15th▼ 11· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)30.3%Ranked 17th▼ 9· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)25.6%Ranked 11th▼ 12· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)30%Ranked 36th▼ 13· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)31.8%Ranked 35th▼ 10· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed short-cycle tertiary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)28.3%Ranked 35th▼ 19· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.57Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, both sexes (%)45.9%Ranked 33rd▼ 38· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female (%)48.9%Ranked 29th▼ 39· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 18th▼ 8· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.59Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male (%)43%Ranked 34th▼ 45· 2024
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.56Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)36.5%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, female (%)37.7%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, poorest quintile, male (%)35.3%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1Ranked 9th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, both sexes (%)63.7%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, female (%)63.8%Ranked 15th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, richest quintile, male (%)63.6%Ranked 16th· 2019
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, both sexes (%)43.8%Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, female (%)45.9%Ranked 44th▲ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, rural, male (%)41.8%Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th—· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, both sexes (%)47.4%Ranked 65th▲ 4· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, female (%)49.9%Ranked 62nd▲ 3· 2022
- Educational attainment rate, completed upper secondary education or higher, population 25+ years, urban, male (%)44.9%Ranked 70th▲ 1· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.74Ranked 13th▼ 11· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, both sexes (%)81.7%Ranked 13th▼ 10· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female (%)70.2%Ranked 18th▼ 11· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.73Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, male (%)94.9%Ranked 5th▼ 6· 2024
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, both sexes (%)68.4%Ranked 15th▲ 5· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, female (%)50.2%Ranked 21st▲ 5· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, rural, male (%)87.2%Ranked 6th—· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.74Ranked 21st▲ 5· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, both sexes (%)80.2%Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, female (%)69%Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2022
- Elderly literacy rate, population 65+ years, urban, male (%)93%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2022
- End month of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non-tertiary education)6Ranked 7th—· 2025
- End month of the academic school year (tertiary education)1Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2023
- End of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non tertiary education)2,025Ranked 1st—· 2025
- End of the academic school year (tertiary education)2,023Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood education, both sexes (number)169,671Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood education, female (number)83,420Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in early childhood education, male (number)86,251Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, both sexes (number)600,132Ranked 62nd▲ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, female (number)298,801Ranked 61st▲ 3· 2023
- Enrolment in lower secondary education, male (number)301,331Ranked 60th▲ 3· 2023
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, both sexes (number)174Ranked 77th▲ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, female (number)124Ranked 74th▲ 7· 2023
- Enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education, male (number)50Ranked 78th▲ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, both sexes (number)169,671Ranked 85th▼ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, female (number)83,420Ranked 85th▼ 3· 2023
- Enrolment in pre-primary education, male (number)86,251Ranked 84th▼ 5· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, both sexes (number)514,700Ranked 92nd—· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, female (number)251,063Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in primary education, male (number)263,637Ranked 91st▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, both sexes (number)868,232Ranked 67th▲ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, female (number)447,716Ranked 63rd▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in secondary education, male (number)420,516Ranked 67th▲ 3· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, both sexes (number)223,977Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, female (number)139,419Ranked 71st▲ 6· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, all programmes, male (number)84,558Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes (number)32,696Ranked 48th▲ 6· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, female (number)16,717Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 5 programmes, male (number)15,979Ranked 45th▲ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, both sexes (number)167,826Ranked 66th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, female (number)108,673Ranked 58th▲ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 6 programmes, male (number)59,153Ranked 72nd▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, both sexes (number)22,677Ranked 72nd▼ 3· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, female (number)13,585Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 7 programmes, male (number)9,092Ranked 69th▼ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, both sexes (number)778Ranked 84th▲ 1· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, female (number)444Ranked 77th▼ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in tertiary education, ISCED 8 programmes, male (number)334Ranked 86th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, both sexes (number)268,100Ranked 74th▲ 4· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, female (number)148,915Ranked 67th▲ 2· 2023
- Enrolment in upper secondary education, male (number)119,185Ranked 77th▲ 1· 2023
- Expected years of schooling13Ranked 113th▲ 9· 2023
- Expected years of schooling among boys12.2Ranked 128th▲ 4· 2023
- Expenditure on education as a percentage of total government expenditure (%) (IMF calculation)20.7Ranked 6th▼ 11· 2021
- Expenditure on education (public, households, ODA) as a percentage of GDP8.1Ranked 7th▼ 37· 2017
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in curricula70.8Ranked 35th· 2020
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in national education policies87.5Ranked 4th· 2020
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in student assessment83.3Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Extent to which global citizenship education and education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in teacher education80Ranked 7th· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in curricula70.8Ranked 35th· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in national education policies87.5Ranked 4th· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in student assessment83.3Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Extent to which (i) global citizenship education and (ii) education for sustainable development are mainstreamed in teacher education80Ranked 7th· 2020
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman3.3Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2024
- Fertility rate, total (births per woman)3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- GDP at market prices (constant 2010 US$)10.96BRanked 140th▲ 8· 2024
- GDP (constant LCU)10.96BRanked 162nd▼ 2· 2024
- GDP (current LCU)13.71BRanked 164th▼ 3· 2024
- GDP (current US$)13.71BRanked 140th▲ 12· 2024
- GDP deflator (base year varies by country)125.1Ranked 108th▼ 22· 2024
- GDP growth (annual %)-26.6Ranked 184th▼ 10· 2024
- GDP per capita (current LCU)2,592.3Ranked 182nd▼ 13· 2024
- GDP per capita (current US$)2,592.3Ranked 140th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2011 international $)3,845.5Ranked 154th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP per capita, PPP (current international $)4,371.1Ranked 154th▼ 2· 2024
- GDP, PPP (constant 2011 international $)20.34BRanked 147th▲ 1· 2024
- GDP, PPP (current international $)23.12BRanked 147th▲ 1· 2024
- GNI (current LCU)16.65BRanked 160th▼ 3· 2024
- GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$)3,080Ranked 125th▲ 2· 2024
- GNI per capita (current LCU)3,147.5Ranked 178th▼ 13· 2024
- GNI per capita, PPP (current international $)5,310Ranked 146th▲ 4· 2024
- Government expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)5.4%Ranked 40th▼ 20· 2021
- Government expenditure on education, constant PPP$ (millions)1,681.4Ranked 71st▼ 20· 2021
- Government expenditure on education, constant US$ (millions)976.4Ranked 68th▼ 12· 2021
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, constant PPP$ (millions)1,582.5Ranked 9th▼ 6· 2021
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, constant US$ (millions)918.9Ranked 9th▼ 5· 2021
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, PPP$ (millions)1,425.9Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2021
- Government expenditure on education not specified by level, US$ (millions)926.2Ranked 8th▼ 6· 2021
- Government expenditure on education, PPP$ (millions)1,515Ranked 71st▼ 18· 2021
- Government expenditure on education, US$ (millions)984.1Ranked 65th▼ 13· 2021
- Government expenditure on tertiary education as a percentage of GDP (%)0.32%Ranked 95th· 2021
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant PPP$ (millions)98.9Ranked 76th· 2021
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant US$ (millions)57.4Ranked 76th· 2021
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, PPP$ (millions)89.1Ranked 76th· 2021
- Government expenditure on tertiary education, US$ (millions)57.9Ranked 74th· 2021
- Government spending on education as share of GDP5.4%Ranked 40th▼ 20· 2021
- Gross enrollment ratio in primary education91.4%Ranked 139th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 26th▼ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, both sexes (%)44.5%Ranked 76th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, female (%)54.8%Ranked 71st▼ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, male (%)34%Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 64th▼ 13· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, both sexes (%)94.2%Ranked 101st▲ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, female (%)94.5%Ranked 97th▼ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, lower secondary, male (%)94%Ranked 97th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, both sexes (%)0.16%Ranked 80th▲ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, female (%)0.23%Ranked 80th▲ 8· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, post-secondary non-tertiary, male (%)0.09%Ranked 78th▲ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 100th▼ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 66th▼ 17· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%)92.9%Ranked 116th▼ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, female (%)92.9%Ranked 117th▼ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, male (%)93%Ranked 116th▲ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, both sexes (%)90%Ranked 110th▲ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, female (%)91.8%Ranked 99th▼ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary and secondary, male (%)88.2%Ranked 111th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, both sexes (%)91.4%Ranked 139th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, female (%)91%Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary, male (%)91.8%Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, both sexes (%)78.8%Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, female (%)82.5%Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, primary to tertiary, male (%)75%Ranked 76th—· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, both sexes (%)89.1%Ranked 92nd▼ 2· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, female (%)92.2%Ranked 85th▼ 3· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, secondary, male (%)86.1%Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPI)1.2Ranked 9th▼ 6· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, both sexes (%)79.5%Ranked 91st▼ 4· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, female (%)87.9%Ranked 74th▼ 7· 2023
- Gross enrolment ratio, upper secondary, male (%)71.1%Ranked 100th▼ 1· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 10th▼ 8· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, both sexes (%)35.1%Ranked 46th▲ 6· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, female (%)46.1%Ranked 44th▲ 5· 2023
- Gross graduation ratio from first degree programmes (ISCED 6 and 7) in tertiary education, male (%)23.8%Ranked 54th▲ 5· 2023
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, female (% of relevant age group)101.2Ranked 46th▼ 57· 2018
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, male (% of relevant age group)98.5Ranked 57th▼ 33· 2018
- Gross intake ratio in first grade of primary education, total (% of relevant age group)99.8Ranked 54th▼ 43· 2018
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 42nd▼ 7· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)91.2%Ranked 74th▲ 9· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, female (%)93.8%Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of lower secondary general education, male (%)88.6%Ranked 73rd▲ 5· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 111th▲ 20· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%)91.2%Ranked 94th▲ 5· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, female (%)90.3%Ranked 95th▲ 2· 2023
- Gross intake ratio to the last grade of primary education, male (%)92%Ranked 88th▲ 7· 2023
- Harmonized test scores among all students412.3Ranked 90th▲ 5· 2020
- Harmonized test scores among all students412.3Ranked 90th▲ 5· 2020
- Harmonized test scores among all students412.3Ranked 90th▲ 5· 2020
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, female (scale 0–188)121.7Ranked 68th▼ 6· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, male (scale 0–188)97.5Ranked 88th▲ 6· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): education pillar score, total (scale 0–188)109.5Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2025
- IIASA rates of no education projections0.2%Ranked 115th▼ 3· 2100
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, both sexes (number)815Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2022
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, % female74Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2022
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, female (number)601Ranked 9th▼ 6· 2022
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, rural, male (number)214Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2022
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, both sexes (number)5,622Ranked 7th▼ 8· 2022
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, % female50Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2022
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, female (number)2,788Ranked 5th▼ 9· 2022
- Illiterate youth population, 15-24 years, urban, male (number)2,834Ranked 8th▼ 6· 2022
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, both sexes (number)0Ranked 88th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, female (number)0Ranked 78th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa, male (number)0Ranked 81st▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, both sexes (number)0Ranked 47th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, female (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Algeria, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, female (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Angola, male (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, female (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Benin, male (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, both sexes (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, female (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Botswana, male (number)0Ranked 14th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, female (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burkina Faso, male (number)0Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, female (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Burundi, male (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, both sexes (number)0Ranked 52nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, female (number)0Ranked 41st▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cameroon, male (number)0Ranked 43rd▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, female (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Cape Verde, male (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, female (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Chad, male (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, female (number)0Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Comoros, male (number)0Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, female (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Côte d'Ivoire, male (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, both sexes (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, female (number)0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Djibouti, male (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, both sexes (number)0Ranked 58th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, female (number)0Ranked 45th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Egypt, male (number)0Ranked 52nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, female (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Equatorial Guinea, male (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, female (number)0Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eritrea, male (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, both sexes (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, female (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Eswatini, male (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 43rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, female (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ethiopia, male (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, female (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Gabon, male (number)0Ranked 25th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, both sexes (number)0Ranked 53rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, female (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Ghana, male (number)0Ranked 48th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, female (number)0Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea-Bissau, male (number)0Ranked 18th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, female (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Guinea, male (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, both sexes (number)0Ranked 52nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, female (number)0Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Kenya, male (number)0Ranked 39th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, both sexes (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, female (number)0Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Lesotho, male (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, female (number)0Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Liberia, male (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, female (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Libya, male (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, female (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Madagascar, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, female (number)0Ranked 17th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Malawi, male (number)0Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, female (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mali, male (number)0Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, female (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritania, male (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, female (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mauritius, male (number)0Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, both sexes (number)0Ranked 49th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, female (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Morocco, male (number)0Ranked 45th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, female (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Mozambique, male (number)0Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, female (number)0Ranked 18th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Namibia, male (number)0Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, female (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, both sexes (number)0Ranked 64th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, female (number)0Ranked 54th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Nigeria, male (number)0Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Niger, male (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, female (number)0Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Rwanda, male (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sao Tome and Principe, male (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, female (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Senegal, male (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, both sexes (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, female (number)0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Seychelles, male (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, female (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sierra Leone, male (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, female (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Somalia, male (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, both sexes (number)0Ranked 46th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, female (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Africa, male (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 22nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, female (number)0Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from South Sudan, male (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, female (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan, male (number)0Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Sudan (pre-secession), both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 19· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, female (number)0Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Central African Republic, male (number)0Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, both sexes (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, female (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Congo, male (number)0Ranked 32nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, female (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, female (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the Gambia, male (number)0Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 42nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, female (number)0Ranked 30th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from the United Republic of Tanzania, male (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, female (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Togo, male (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 45th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, female (number)0Ranked 39th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Tunisia, male (number)0Ranked 36th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, both sexes (number)0Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, female (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Uganda, male (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, female (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zambia, male (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, both sexes (number)0Ranked 42nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, female (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Africa: Students from Zimbabwe, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 86th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, female (number)0Ranked 82nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia, male (number)0Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, female (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Afghanistan, male (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, female (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Armenia, male (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, female (number)0Ranked 32nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Azerbaijan, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, female (number)0Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bahrain, male (number)0Ranked 22nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, both sexes (number)0Ranked 51st▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, female (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bangladesh, male (number)0Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, female (number)0Ranked 14th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Bhutan, male (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, female (number)0Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Brunei Darussalam, male (number)0Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, female (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cambodia, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, both sexes (number)0Ranked 68th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, female (number)0Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from China, male (number)0Ranked 57th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, female (number)0Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Cyprus, male (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 40th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, female (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Georgia, male (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, both sexes (number)0Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, female (number)0Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China, male (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, both sexes (number)0Ranked 68th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, female (number)0Ranked 59th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from India, male (number)0Ranked 65th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 46th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, female (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Indonesia, male (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, both sexes (number)0Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, female (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Iraq, male (number)0Ranked 43rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, both sexes (number)0Ranked 51st▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, female (number)0Ranked 38th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Israel, male (number)0Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 49th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, female (number)0Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Japan, male (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 52nd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, female (number)0Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Jordan, male (number)0Ranked 43rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 48th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, female (number)0Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kazakhstan, male (number)0Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, female (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kuwait, male (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, female (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Kyrgyzstan, male (number)0Ranked 26th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, female (number)0Ranked 16th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lao People's Democratic Republic, male (number)0Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, both sexes (number)0Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, female (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Lebanon, male (number)0Ranked 48th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, both sexes (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, female (number)0Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Macao, Special Administrative Region of China, male (number)0Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, female (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Malaysia, male (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, both sexes (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, female (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Maldives, male (number)0Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, female (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Mongolia, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, both sexes (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, female (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Myanmar, male (number)0Ranked 26th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, both sexes (number)0Ranked 43rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, female (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Nepal, male (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, female (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Oman, male (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 64th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, female (number)0Ranked 54th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Pakistan, male (number)0Ranked 55th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, both sexes (number)0Ranked 45th▲ 14· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, female (number)0Ranked 29th· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Palestine, male (number)0Ranked 44th· 2020
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, female (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Qatar, male (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 51st▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, female (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Saudi Arabia, male (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, both sexes (number)0Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, female (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Singapore, male (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, both sexes (number)0Ranked 47th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, female (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Sri Lanka, male (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, female (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Tajikistan, male (number)0Ranked 28th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, both sexes (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, female (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Thailand, male (number)0Ranked 32nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, female (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, male (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, both sexes (number)0Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, female (number)0Ranked 52nd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Islamic Republic of Iran, male (number)0Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, both sexes (number)0Ranked 50th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, female (number)0Ranked 42nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Philippines, male (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, female (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Republic of Korea, male (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, both sexes (number)0Ranked 54th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, female (number)0Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Syrian Arab Republic, male (number)0Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, both sexes (number)0Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, female (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the United Arab Emirates, male (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, both sexes (number)0Ranked 43rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, female (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from the Yemen, male (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, both sexes (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, female (number)0Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Timor-Leste, male (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, both sexes (number)0Ranked 59th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, female (number)0Ranked 47th▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkey, male (number)0Ranked 55th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, female (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Turkmenistan, male (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, both sexes (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, female (number)0Ranked 31st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Uzbekistan, male (number)0Ranked 34th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, both sexes (number)0Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, female (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Asia: Students from Viet Nam, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, female (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Anguilla, male (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Antigua and Barbuda, male (number)0Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, female (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Aruba, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, both sexes (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Bahamas, male (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, both sexes (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Barbados, male (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, both sexes (number)0Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Belize, male (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, female (number)0Ranked 25th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Costa Rica, male (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, female (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Cuba, male (number)0Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, female (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominica, male (number)0Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, both sexes (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, female (number)0Ranked 22nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Dominican Republic, male (number)0Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, both sexes (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, female (number)0Ranked 23rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from El Salvador, male (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Grenada, male (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, female (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Guatemala, male (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, both sexes (number)0Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, female (number)0Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Haiti, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, female (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Honduras, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, both sexes (number)0Ranked 23rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, female (number)0Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Jamaica, male (number)0Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, both sexes (number)0Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, female (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Mexico, male (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, female (number)0Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Montserrat, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, both sexes (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, female (number)0Ranked 20th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Nicaragua, male (number)0Ranked 19th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, both sexes (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, female (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 8· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Panama, male (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, female (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Kitts and Nevis, male (number)0Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Lucia, male (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, male (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, female (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the British Virgin Islands, male (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, female (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Cayman Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Netherlands Antilles, both sexes (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from the Turks and Caicos Islands, male (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, both sexes (number)0Ranked 15th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, female (number)0Ranked 13th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from Trinidad and Tobago, male (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Caribbean and Central America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 71st▼ 7· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 66th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 68th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 60th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 52nd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 54th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 76th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 70th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 68th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, both sexes (number)0Ranked 86th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, female (number)0Ranked 81st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe, male (number)0Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, female (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Albania, male (number)0Ranked 32nd▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, both sexes (number)0Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, female (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Andorra, male (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, both sexes (number)0Ranked 47th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, female (number)0Ranked 38th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Austria, male (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, both sexes (number)0Ranked 42nd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, female (number)0Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belarus, male (number)0Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, both sexes (number)0Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, female (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Belgium, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, both sexes (number)0Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, female (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bosnia and Herzegovina, male (number)0Ranked 26th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, both sexes (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, female (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Bulgaria, male (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, female (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Croatia, male (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, female (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Denmark, male (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, female (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Estonia, male (number)0Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, both sexes (number)0Ranked 42nd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, female (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Finland, male (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, both sexes (number)0Ranked 64th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, female (number)0Ranked 55th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from France, male (number)0Ranked 57th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, both sexes (number)0Ranked 62nd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, female (number)0Ranked 55th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Germany, male (number)0Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Gibraltar, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, both sexes (number)0Ranked 46th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, female (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Greece, male (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, both sexes (number)0Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, female (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Hungary, male (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, both sexes (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, female (number)0Ranked 22nd▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Iceland, male (number)0Ranked 21st▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, female (number)0Ranked 35th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Ireland, male (number)0Ranked 36th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, both sexes (number)0Ranked 61st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, female (number)0Ranked 54th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Italy, male (number)0Ranked 54th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 33rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, female (number)0Ranked 30th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Latvia, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, female (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Liechtenstein, male (number)0Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, female (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Lithuania, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, female (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Luxembourg, male (number)0Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, both sexes (number)0Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, female (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Malta, male (number)0Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, both sexes (number)0Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, female (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Monaco, male (number)0Ranked 10th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, female (number)0Ranked 24th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Montenegro, male (number)0Ranked 20th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, female (number)0Ranked 29th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from North Macedonia, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, female (number)0Ranked 37th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Norway, male (number)0Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, both sexes (number)0Ranked 46th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, female (number)0Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Poland, male (number)0Ranked 33rd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, both sexes (number)0Ranked 47th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, female (number)0Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Portugal, male (number)0Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, female (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Romania, male (number)0Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from San Marino, male (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, female (number)0Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Serbia, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 37th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, female (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovakia, male (number)0Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, female (number)0Ranked 24th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Slovenia, male (number)0Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, both sexes (number)0Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, female (number)0Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Spain, male (number)0Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, both sexes (number)0Ranked 48th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, female (number)0Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Sweden, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, both sexes (number)0Ranked 46th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, female (number)0Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from Switzerland, male (number)0Ranked 37th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, female (number)0Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Czechia, male (number)0Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, female (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Holy See, male (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 47th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, female (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Netherlands, male (number)0Ranked 42nd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, both sexes (number)0Ranked 34th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, female (number)0Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Republic of Moldova, male (number)0Ranked 27th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, both sexes (number)0Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, female (number)0Ranked 59th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Russian Federation, male (number)0Ranked 55th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, both sexes (number)0Ranked 54th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, female (number)0Ranked 48th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the Ukraine, male (number)0Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, both sexes (number)0Ranked 59th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, female (number)0Ranked 53rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from the United Kingdom, male (number)0Ranked 51st▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Europe: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 27th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (number)0Ranked 73rd▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 71st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, female (number)0Ranked 66th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Latin America and the Caribbean, male (number)0Ranked 65th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 81st▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 77th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 78th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, both sexes (number)0Ranked 75th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, female (number)0Ranked 69th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, male (number)0Ranked 70th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, female (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Bermuda, male (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, both sexes (number)0Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, female (number)0Ranked 49th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from Canada, male (number)0Ranked 47th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, both sexes (number)0Ranked 76th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, female (number)0Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from the United States, male (number)0Ranked 66th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from North America, the Caribbean and Central America, both sexes (number)0Ranked 44th—· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, both sexes (number)0Ranked 52nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, female (number)0Ranked 40th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania, male (number)0Ranked 42nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 43rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, female (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Australia, male (number)0Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, both sexes (number)0Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, female (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Fiji, male (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, female (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Kiribati, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, both sexes (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, female (number)0Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Nauru, male (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, both sexes (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, female (number)0Ranked 19th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from New Zealand, male (number)0Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Niue, male (number)0Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, female (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Palau, male (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, both sexes (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, female (number)0Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Papua New Guinea, male (number)0Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, female (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Samoa, male (number)0Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, female (number)0Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Cook Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, female (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Federated States of Micronesia, male (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, female (number)0Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Marshall Islands, male (number)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, both sexes (number)0Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, female (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from the Solomon Islands, male (number)0Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, female (number)0Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tokelau, male (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, both sexes (number)0Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, female (number)0Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tonga, male (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, both sexes (number)0Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, female (number)0Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Tuvalu, male (number)0Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, female (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from unknown countries, male (number)0Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, female (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from Oceania: Students from Vanuatu, male (number)0Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America, both sexes (number)0Ranked 51st▼ 2· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, both sexes (number)0Ranked 40th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, female (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 6· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Argentina, male (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, both sexes (number)0Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, female (number)0Ranked 43rd▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Brazil, male (number)0Ranked 42nd▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, both sexes (number)0Ranked 40th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, female (number)0Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Chile, male (number)0Ranked 32nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 45th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, female (number)0Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Colombia, male (number)0Ranked 41st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, both sexes (number)0Ranked 38th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, female (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Ecuador, male (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, both sexes (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, female (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Guyana, male (number)0Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, both sexes (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, female (number)0Ranked 18th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Paraguay, male (number)0Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, both sexes (number)0Ranked 43rd▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, female (number)0Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Peru, male (number)0Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, both sexes (number)0Ranked 15th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, female (number)0Ranked 13th▲ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Suriname, male (number)0Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, both sexes (number)0Ranked 39th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, female (number)0Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, male (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, both sexes (number)0Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, female (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from the Plurinational State of Bolivia, male (number)0Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from unknown countries, both sexes (number)0Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, both sexes (number)0Ranked 25th▼ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, female (number)0Ranked 18th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South America: Students from Uruguay, male (number)0Ranked 19th—· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 70th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 85th▲ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 73rd▼ 4· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 77th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 74th▼ 2· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from the Caribbean and Central America, both sexes (number)0Ranked 50th—· 2012
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, both sexes (number)0Ranked 55th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, female (number)0Ranked 48th▼ 3· 2023
- Inbound internationally mobile students from unknown continents, male (number)0Ranked 45th▼ 5· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, adjusted gender parity index (UIS estimate) (GPIA)0.64Ranked 23rd▲ 16· 2001
- Inbound mobility rate, both sexes0%Ranked 104th—· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 104th—· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 98th▲ 1· 2023
- Inbound mobility rate, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 98th▲ 1· 2023
- Inequality in education0.1Ranked 80th▲ 3· 2023
- Initial government expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)5.3%Ranked 25th▼ 26· 2021
- Initial government funding per tertiary student as a percentage of GDP per capita6.8Ranked 65th· 2021
- Initial government funding per tertiary student, constant PPP$427.7Ranked 65th· 2021
- Initial private expenditure on education (household) as a percentage of GDP (%)3.7%Ranked 3rd▼ 56· 2017
- Initial private expenditure on education (other non-educational private entities) as a percentage of GDP (%)0%Ranked 34th· 2021
- International expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP (%)0%Ranked 69th▼ 42· 2021
- Learning-adjusted years of schooling among boys7.6Ranked 82nd▼ 1· 2020
- Life expectancy at birth, total (years)65.2Ranked 187th▲ 112· 2023
- Literacy rate97.9%Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2024
- Literacy rate97.8%Ranked 12th▲ 4· 2022
- Literacy rate, adult female (% of females ages 15 and above)96.8Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2024
- Literacy rate, adult male (% of males ages 15 and above)99.4Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2024
- Literacy rate among adults aged 15+97.9%Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2024
- Literacy rate among adults aged 15+97.9%Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2024
- Literacy rate among older adults aged 65+81.7%Ranked 13th▼ 10· 2024
- Literacy rate among young men aged 15–2499.9%Ranked 2nd▼ 8· 2024
- Literacy rate among young people (15–24 years), adjusted gender parity index0.99Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female (%)98.5%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, male (%)99.6%Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2024
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.98Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, both sexes (%)98.2%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, female (%)97.3%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, rural, male (%)99.1%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 11th▲ 5· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, both sexes (%)98.9%Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, female (%)98.5%Ranked 14th▲ 6· 2022
- Literacy rate, population 25-64 years, urban, male (%)99.3%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2022
- Literacy rate, youth (ages 15-24), gender parity index (GPI)0.99Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2024
- Literacy rate, youth female (% of females ages 15-24)99.2Ranked 10th▼ 5· 2024
- Literacy rate, youth male (% of males ages 15-24)99.9Ranked 2nd▼ 8· 2024
- Literacy rate, youth total (% of people ages 15-24)99.4Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2024
- Lower secondary completion rate, female (% of relevant age group)93.8Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Lower secondary completion rate, male (% of relevant age group)88.6Ranked 73rd▲ 5· 2023
- Lower secondary completion rate, total (% of relevant age group)91.2Ranked 74th▲ 9· 2023
- Lower secondary school starting age (years)10Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 11th▼ 15· 2022
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, both sexes10.1Ranked 31st▼ 5· 2022
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, female10.2Ranked 28th▼ 6· 2022
- Mean years of schooling (ISCED 1 or higher), population 25+ years, male10Ranked 29th▼ 8· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.66Ranked 142nd▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)6.3%Ranked 44th▲ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, female (UIS estimate) (%)5%Ranked 54th▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, male (UIS estimate) (%)7.6%Ranked 34th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.32Ranked 125th▼ 10· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)1.3%Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.63%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)2%Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.39Ranked 97th▼ 22· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 34th▼ 11· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.03%Ranked 23rd▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.18%Ranked 47th▲ 4· 2018
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.17%Ranked 29th▲ 5· 2018
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.17Ranked 167th▼ 6· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.17Ranked 172nd▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.04%Ranked 59th▼ 9· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 90th▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 50th▼ 6· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.04%Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 85th▼ 8· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.06%Ranked 48th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.39Ranked 182nd▼ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.64%Ranked 110th—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.36%Ranked 132nd▲ 5· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.93%Ranked 95th▲ 6· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.18Ranked 119th▼ 10· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 35th▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 52nd▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.04%Ranked 27th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.49Ranked 110th▼ 9· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 86th▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 92nd▼ 2· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 80th▼ 3· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)0.91Ranked 40th▲ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)4.1%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (%)3.9%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (%)4.3%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (UIS estimate)1.2Ranked 46th▼ 14· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 110th▼ 4· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 107th▼ 6· 2023
- Mobile outbound gross enrolment ratio, tertiary students studying in the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 110th▼ 3· 2023
- Mortality rate, infant (per 1,000 live births)14.3Ranked 66th▲ 7· 2023
- Net enrollment rate in pre-primary education52.5%Ranked 91st▲ 2· 2023
- Net enrollment rate in primary education90.4%Ranked 121st▲ 5· 2023
- Net enrollment rate in primary education among girls90.1%Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Net enrollment rate, pre-primary, boys (%)67.3%Ranked 65th▼ 24· 2023
- Net enrollment rates in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index1Ranked 35th▼ 15· 2023
- Net enrollment rates in primary education, adjusted gender parity index0.99Ranked 84th—· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 47th▲ 22· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, both sexes (%)52.5%Ranked 74th▲ 3· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, female (%)53.1%Ranked 72nd▲ 5· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, early childhood education, male (%)51.9%Ranked 74th▲ 5· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 46th▲ 20· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, both sexes (%)52.5%Ranked 91st▲ 2· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, female (%)53.1%Ranked 87th▲ 1· 2023
- Net enrolment rate, pre-primary, male (%)51.9%Ranked 89th▲ 1· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.52Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)-31,786Ranked 92nd▼ 5· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), female (UIS estimate) (number)-12,828Ranked 87th▼ 3· 2023
- Net flow of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), male (UIS estimate) (number)-18,958Ranked 89th—· 2023
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)-14.2%Ranked 88th▼ 3· 2023
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), female (UIS estimate) (%)-9.2%Ranked 80th▼ 5· 2023
- Net flow ratio of internationally mobile students (inbound - outbound), male (UIS estimate) (%)-22.4%Ranked 85th▼ 1· 2023
- Net intake rate in grade 1, female (% of official school-age population)85Ranked 11th▼ 16· 2012
- Net intake rate in grade 1, male (% of official school-age population)84.5Ranked 12th▼ 11· 2012
- Net intake rate in grade 1 (% of official school-age population)84.8Ranked 11th▼ 13· 2012
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)5.5%Ranked 41st· 2021
- Non-teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)3.1%Ranked 40th· 2021
- Normalized harmonized test scores among all students0.7Ranked 90th▲ 5· 2020
- Number of attacks on students, personnel and institutions402Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2024
- Number of years of compulsory pre-primary education guaranteed in legal frameworks0Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Number of years of compulsory primary and secondary education guaranteed in legal frameworks10Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Number of years of free pre-primary education guaranteed in legal frameworks1Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Number of years of free primary and secondary education guaranteed in legal frameworks12Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to compulsory education6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to compulsory education (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to early childhood education (years)4Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to lower secondary education (years)10Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Official entrance age to post-secondary non-tertiary education (years)18Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to pre-primary education (years)4Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to pre-primary education (years)4Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to primary education (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Official entrance age to upper secondary education (years)15Ranked 4th—· 2025
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)6,511Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)1,603Ranked 41st—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)4,908Ranked 28th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)93Ranked 33rd▼ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)26Ranked 39th▼ 5· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)66Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)862Ranked 69th▲ 9· 2018
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)824Ranked 41st▲ 6· 2018
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)180Ranked 58th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (number)26Ranked 81st▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (number)154Ranked 47th▼ 3· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)180Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (number)26Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (number)154Ranked 40th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)3,226Ranked 112th▲ 5· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (number)912Ranked 130th▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (number)2,314Ranked 91st▲ 5· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)114Ranked 56th▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (number)18Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (number)96Ranked 49th▼ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)15Ranked 89th▲ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (number)5Ranked 85th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (number)10Ranked 77th▼ 4· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)20,759Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (number)10,012Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (number)10,747Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (number)0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)28Ranked 107th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (number)16Ranked 103rd▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying in the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (number)12Ranked 108th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.41Ranked 104th▲ 5· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)14.2%Ranked 24th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, female (UIS estimate) (%)9.2%Ranked 29th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio, all regions, male (UIS estimate) (%)22.4%Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.2Ranked 98th▲ 6· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)2.9%Ranked 13th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)1.1%Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central and Eastern Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)5.8%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.24Ranked 70th—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.04%Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 23rd▼ 7· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Central Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.39%Ranked 33rd▲ 9· 2018
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia and the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.37%Ranked 26th▲ 9· 2018
- Outbound mobility ratio to East Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.1Ranked 102nd▲ 8· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.1Ranked 106th▲ 9· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 32nd—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 49th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America and the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.18%Ranked 28th▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.08%Ranked 31st▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.02%Ranked 47th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to Latin America, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.18%Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.24Ranked 113th▲ 6· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)1.4%Ranked 84th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.65%Ranked 100th▲ 5· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to North America and Western Europe, male (UIS estimate) (%)2.7%Ranked 59th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.11Ranked 79th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.05%Ranked 23rd▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to South and West Asia, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.11%Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.3Ranked 76th▲ 5· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 40th▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, female (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 48th▲ 6· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to sub-Saharan Africa, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 31st▲ 3· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.56Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)9.3%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, female (UIS estimate) (%)7.2%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Arab States, male (UIS estimate) (%)12.7%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Caribbean, male (UIS estimate) (%)0%Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, both sexes (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, female (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2023
- Outbound mobility ratio to the Pacific, male (UIS estimate) (%)0.01%Ranked 79th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, both sexes (number)119,470Ranked 59th▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, female (number)46,993Ranked 64th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents and youth of secondary school age, male (number)72,477Ranked 55th▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (number)38,162Ranked 52nd▼ 7· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (number)16,729Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (number)21,433Ranked 52nd▼ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, both sexes (number)173,263Ranked 56th▼ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, female (number)74,282Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children, adolescents and youth of primary and secondary school age, male (number)98,981Ranked 50th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, both sexes (number)91,955Ranked 49th▼ 8· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, female (number)44,018Ranked 45th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, male (number)47,937Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age53,793Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, both sexes (number)53,793Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, female (number)27,289Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school children of primary school age, male (number)26,504Ranked 42nd—· 2023
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (number)45,539Ranked 43rd▲ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, female (number)21,226Ranked 42nd▲ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school children, one year before the official primary entry age, male (number)24,313Ranked 43rd▲ 7· 2023
- Out-of-school girls of primary school age27,289Ranked 38th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 115th▲ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)12.3%Ranked 69th▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, female (%)9.7%Ranked 75th▲ 7· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents and youth of lower and upper secondary school age, male (%)14.8%Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.79Ranked 93rd▲ 19· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1Ranked 71st▲ 11· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.25Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 19th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 6th▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (%)6%Ranked 71st—· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.9%Ranked 21st▲ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)7.1%Ranked 85th▼ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (%)5.3%Ranked 67th▲ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (household survey data) (%)1.1%Ranked 21st▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, female (modelled data) (%)7.1%Ranked 81st▼ 4· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.2Ranked 6th▼ 17· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.1Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.9%Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 5th▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.94%Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.1Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)4.7%Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (%)6.7%Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 8th▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 2nd▼ 17· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (household survey data) (%)4.6%Ranked 16th▲ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, male (modelled data) (%)7.1%Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.39Ranked 7th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd▼ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)3.1%Ranked 16th▲ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.8%Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)4.5%Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.28Ranked 7th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)4.3%Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.6Ranked 1st· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.8%Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)6.5%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.31Ranked 7th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 2nd▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.3%Ranked 17th▲ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1Ranked 5th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.64%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.5Ranked 3rd▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.1%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.3Ranked 20th▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, both sexes (household survey data) (%)3.8%Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.8Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, female (household survey data) (%)1.7%Ranked 18th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.23Ranked 6th▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)3.1%Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.2%Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)5.1%Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, male (household survey data) (%)5.7%Ranked 16th▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.38Ranked 7th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)4.7%Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)2.6%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)6.9%Ranked 6th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.47Ranked 7th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)6.2%Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)3.8%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)8.1%Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.19Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.9%Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.63%Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)3.3%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.17Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)3.4%Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.96%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, rural, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)5.6%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.12Ranked 7th▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.7%Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.6%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)4.8%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.22Ranked 23rd▼ 14· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 3rd▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.6%Ranked 17th▲ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.5Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, female (household survey data) (%)0.95%Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.18Ranked 7th▼ 14· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.8%Ranked 13th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.83%Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)4.6%Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 3rd▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, male (household survey data) (%)4.2%Ranked 13th▲ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.4Ranked 6th▼ 14· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.5%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.5%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)3.7%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.23Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)3.9%Ranked 15th▲ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.4%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)6.2%Ranked 6th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.37Ranked 6th▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.2%Ranked 18th▲ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.64%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.7%Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.11Ranked 4th▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.6%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.53%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for adolescents of lower secondary school age, urban, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)4.7%Ranked 6th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.76Ranked 98th▲ 8· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)11.3%Ranked 47th▼ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, female (%)9.8%Ranked 48th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children, adolescents and youth of primary, lower secondary and upper secondary school age, male (%)12.8%Ranked 45th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 64th▲ 17· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, both sexes (%)7.7%Ranked 48th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, female (%)7.4%Ranked 46th▲ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children and adolescents of primary and lower secondary school age, male (%)7.9%Ranked 46th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age9.6%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 29th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)1.1Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.47Ranked 27th▲ 26· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.83Ranked 21st▲ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, both sexes (%)9.6%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.5%Ranked 22nd—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)9%Ranked 59th—· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female (%)9.9%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.84Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 4th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female (household survey data) (%)0.93%Ranked 21st▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, female (modelled data) (%)9.6%Ranked 59th—· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.53Ranked 7th▼ 14· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.2%Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.31Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.85%Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.7Ranked 2nd▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.6%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male (%)9.2%Ranked 39th▲ 3· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.8Ranked 10th▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 5th▼ 14· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male (household survey data) (%)2%Ranked 19th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, male (modelled data) (%)8.4%Ranked 67th▲ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.27Ranked 9th▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.59Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.5%Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.67%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.79Ranked 3rd▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.4%Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.59Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.35Ranked 8th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.9%Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.78Ranked 6th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.4%Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.17Ranked 7th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.4%Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.11Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd▼ 19· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.34Ranked 6th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.52Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.23Ranked 8th▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, primary education, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.43Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.42Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.1Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.63%Ranked 17th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.7Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.38%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.39Ranked 6th▼ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.9%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.48Ranked 20th▲ 18· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.1Ranked 5th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.3%Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.2Ranked 4th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, female (household survey data) (%)0.81%Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.7%Ranked 14th▼ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.32%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)3%Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.2Ranked 5th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, male (household survey data) (%)1.7%Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1%Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.76%Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.1%Ranked 9th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.49%Ranked 9th▼ 9· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.66%Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.89%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.41%Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.1%Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)2.7%Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, rural, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.7%Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.56Ranked 8th▲ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.8%Ranked 14th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.6Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.3%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.7Ranked 4th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.3%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.46Ranked 19th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.5%Ranked 18th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.8Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, female (household survey data) (%)0.96%Ranked 19th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1%Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.98%Ranked 9th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 4th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, male (household survey data) (%)2.1%Ranked 18th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.7%Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.89%Ranked 8th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.6%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)2.1%Ranked 14th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.5%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.8%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.62%Ranked 17th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.24%Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1%Ranked 8th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.8%Ranked 13th▼ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.1%Ranked 9th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children of primary school age, urban, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.4%Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before official primary entry age31.4%Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 81st—· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (%)31.4%Ranked 35th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, female (%)29.9%Ranked 36th▲ 4· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for children one year before the official primary entry age, male (%)32.7%Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.59Ranked 120th▲ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA) (modelled data)0.5Ranked 173rd▲ 1· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.45Ranked 45th▼ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 25th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 6th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (%)24.1%Ranked 55th▼ 6· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (household survey data) (%)19.7%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (modelled data) (%)19.6%Ranked 85th▼ 2· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (%)17.9%Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.95Ranked 7th▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 1st▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (household survey data) (%)11.8%Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, female (modelled data) (%)13.1%Ranked 102nd▼ 4· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.27Ranked 6th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st▼ 17· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)21.3%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 1st▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)8.6%Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)32%Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (%)30.4%Ranked 43rd▼ 5· 2023
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 3rd▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.5Ranked 3rd▼ 14· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (household survey data) (%)26.5%Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, male (modelled data) (%)26.1%Ranked 78th—· 2025
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.39Ranked 6th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 7· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)24.1%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.77Ranked 4th▼ 11· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)13.2%Ranked 6th▼ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)33.9%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.61Ranked 6th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1Ranked 4th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)25.7%Ranked 11th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.76Ranked 4th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)18.9%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)31%Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.3Ranked 6th▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)10.8%Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)4.8%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.6Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)16%Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.32Ranked 18th▼ 19· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.3Ranked 5th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, both sexes (household survey data) (%)24%Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 1st· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, female (household survey data) (%)11.3%Ranked 19th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.31Ranked 5th▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)25%Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)11.3%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)35.8%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.2Ranked 5th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, male (household survey data) (%)35.6%Ranked 9th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.24Ranked 6th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)27.6%Ranked 9th▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)10.8%Ranked 7th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)45.1%Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.42Ranked 6th· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)26.5%Ranked 11th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)15%Ranked 8th▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)35.5%Ranked 7th▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.16Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)17.5%Ranked 9th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)4.9%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)29.7%Ranked 4th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.57Ranked 5th▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)23.9%Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)17.7%Ranked 6th▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, rural, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)30.8%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.67Ranked 5th▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)17.8%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)14.1%Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)21.2%Ranked 7th—· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.5Ranked 19th▼ 19· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 2nd▼ 12· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, both sexes (household survey data) (%)18.5%Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.8Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, female (household survey data) (%)12%Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.25Ranked 5th▼ 15· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)19.7%Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, female (household survey data) (%)7.6%Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, fourth quintile, male (household survey data) (%)30.3%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 2nd▼ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, male (household survey data) (%)24%Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.46Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)22.9%Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, female (household survey data) (%)14.1%Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, middle quintile, male (household survey data) (%)30.3%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.66Ranked 2nd▼ 10· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)25.6%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)19.8%Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)30.1%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.4Ranked 5th▼ 16· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)8.8%Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)4.8%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)12.2%Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.68Ranked 4th▼ 8· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, second quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)16.7%Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, second quintile, female (household survey data) (%)13.4%Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2020
- Out-of-school rate for youth of upper secondary school age, urban, second quintile, male (household survey data) (%)19.6%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, both sexes (number)81,308Ranked 59th▼ 2· 2023
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, female (number)30,264Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Out-of-school youth of upper secondary school age, male (number)51,044Ranked 57th▼ 1· 2023
- Over-age students, primary, female (% of female enrollment)1.5Ranked 70th▼ 42· 2018
- Over-age students, primary, male (% of male enrollment)1.6Ranked 70th▼ 51· 2018
- Over-age students, primary (% of enrollment)1.5Ranked 71st▼ 47· 2018
- Participation rate in formal and non-formal education and training, by sex (%) - 15 to 64 years old - Both sexes18.9%Ranked 27th▼ 7· 2022
- Participation rate in organized learning (one year before the official primary entry age), by sex (%)68.6Ranked 100th▼ 4· 2023
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)52.6%Ranked 22nd▼ 41· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, female (%)65.2%Ranked 13th▼ 31· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-24 years old, male (%)40.5%Ranked 27th▼ 59· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, both sexes (%)17.5%Ranked 8th▼ 18· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, female (%)21.3%Ranked 4th▼ 14· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 15-64 years old, male (%)13.7%Ranked 19th▼ 24· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 27th▼ 46· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, both sexes (%)1.6%Ranked 26th▼ 44· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, female (%)1.5%Ranked 25th▼ 46· 2024
- Participation rate of youth and adults in formal and non-formal education and training in the previous 12 months, 25-54 years old, male (%)1.7%Ranked 26th▼ 47· 2024
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 10th· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.79Ranked 4th· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, both sexes (%)77.5%Ranked 5th· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, female (%)77.6%Ranked 5th· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, male (%)77.4%Ranked 5th· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, poorest quintile (%)68.9%Ranked 3rd· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, richest quintile (%)87.3%Ranked 5th· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, rural (%)81.3%Ranked 3rd· 2014
- Percentage of children under 5 years experiencing positive and stimulating home learning environments, urban (%)77.6%Ranked 5th· 2014
- Percentage of enrollment in primary education in private institutions44.5%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 46th▲ 23· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, both sexes (%)93.7%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, female (%)49%Ranked 46th▲ 23· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in private institutions, male (%)51%Ranked 53rd▼ 20· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, both sexes (%)6.3%Ranked 94th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, female (%)52%Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in early childhood education programmes in public institutions, male (%)48%Ranked 98th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)39.7%Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, female (%)48.3%Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in private institutions, male (%)51.7%Ranked 39th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 17th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)60.3%Ranked 99th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, female (%)50.8%Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in lower secondary education in public institutions, male (%)49.2%Ranked 102nd▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, female (%)71.3%Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in private institutions, male (%)28.7%Ranked 36th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2018
- Percentage of enrolment in post-secondary non-tertiary education in public institutions, male (%)0%Ranked 73rd▲ 1· 2018
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions93.7%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 49th▲ 15· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)93.7%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, female (%)49%Ranked 49th▲ 15· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in private institutions, male (%)51%Ranked 58th▼ 16· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)6.3%Ranked 104th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, female (%)52%Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in pre-primary education in public institutions, male (%)48%Ranked 105th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 96th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)44.5%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, female (%)47.3%Ranked 96th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in private institutions, male (%)52.7%Ranked 25th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)55.5%Ranked 112th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, female (%)50%Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in primary education in public institutions, male (%)50%Ranked 118th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)29.3%Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, female (%)48%Ranked 83rd▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in private institutions, male (%)52%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)70.7%Ranked 88th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, female (%)53%Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in secondary education in public institutions, male (%)47%Ranked 111th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)81.8%Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, female (%)61.9%Ranked 15th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in private institutions, male (%)38.1%Ranked 89th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)18.2%Ranked 100th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, female (%)63.8%Ranked 15th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in tertiary education in public institutions, male (%)36.2%Ranked 99th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 100th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, both sexes (%)6%Ranked 91st▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, female (%)44.5%Ranked 100th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in private institutions, male (%)55.5%Ranked 12th▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, both sexes (%)94%Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, female (%)56.3%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of enrolment in upper secondary education in public institutions, male (%)43.7%Ranked 112th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.55Ranked 66th▼ 12· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, both sexes (%)0.49%Ranked 88th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, female (%)0.38%Ranked 88th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries and Veterinary programmes, male (%)0.7%Ranked 83rd▲ 15· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, both sexes (%)10.2%Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, female (%)12%Ranked 27th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Arts and Humanities programmes, male (%)6.9%Ranked 40th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.75Ranked 95th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, both sexes (%)28.2%Ranked 36th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, female (%)25.2%Ranked 58th▲ 12· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Business, Administration and Law programmes, male (%)33.6%Ranked 22nd▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 53rd▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, both sexes (%)16.1%Ranked 29th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, female (%)20.3%Ranked 26th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Education programmes, male (%)8.7%Ranked 28th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.34Ranked 38th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, both sexes (%)8.8%Ranked 76th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, female (%)5.2%Ranked 65th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Engineering, Manufacturing and Construction programmes, male (%)15.2%Ranked 71st▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 89th▲ 10· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, both sexes (%)20.1%Ranked 15th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, female (%)21.6%Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Health and Welfare programmes, male (%)17.3%Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st▼ 9· 2015
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 51st▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, female (%)0%Ranked 49th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from programmes in unspecified fields, male (%)0%Ranked 48th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.43Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, both sexes (%)1.3%Ranked 88th▲ 10· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, female (%)0.87%Ranked 86th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Services programmes, male (%)2%Ranked 78th▲ 10· 2023
- Percentage of lower secondary schools providing life skills-based HIV and sexuality education79.6Ranked 9th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations0.78Ranked 51st▲ 1· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations, females0.74Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations, males0.79Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2015
- Percentage of persons employed in cultural occupations that are females16Ranked 50th▲ 2· 2015
- Percentage of persons in cultural employment2.6Ranked 48th▲ 4· 2015
- Percentage of primary schools providing life skills-based HIV and sexuality education0Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.74%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (household survey data) (%)0.52%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (household survey data) (%)0.95%Ranked 20th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.3%Ranked 19th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.58%Ranked 18th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.9%Ranked 18th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.5%Ranked 17th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.54%Ranked 14th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.47%Ranked 16th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.88%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, female (household survey data) (%)0.88%Ranked 19th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, male (household survey data) (%)0.89%Ranked 19th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.97%Ranked 18th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.76%Ranked 18th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)1.1%Ranked 17th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.64%Ranked 16th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)1.3%Ranked 15th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 15th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.69%Ranked 21st· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, female (household survey data) (%)0.42%Ranked 20th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, male (household survey data) (%)0.97%Ranked 19th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)1.3%Ranked 17th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.55%Ranked 16th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)2.1%Ranked 15th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.46%Ranked 19th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.32%Ranked 17th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.61%Ranked 16th· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%)0.56%Ranked 126th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (%)0.56%Ranked 122nd▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%)0.56%Ranked 130th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (%)0.31%Ranked 131st▲ 13· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.67%Ranked 22nd▼ 12· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (%)0.29%Ranked 127th▲ 11· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female (household survey data) (%)0.73%Ranked 21st▼ 14· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (%)0.34%Ranked 132nd▲ 14· 2023
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male (household survey data) (%)0.61%Ranked 22nd▼ 8· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.51%Ranked 20th▼ 14· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.53%Ranked 18th▼ 16· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.5%Ranked 19th▼ 15· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.25%Ranked 18th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.4%Ranked 18th▼ 11· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.08%Ranked 18th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.64%Ranked 20th▼ 14· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, female (household survey data) (%)1%Ranked 19th▼ 14· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, male (household survey data) (%)0.27%Ranked 21st▼ 12· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.57%Ranked 19th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.87%Ranked 17th▼ 16· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.38%Ranked 18th▼ 15· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.5%Ranked 15th▼ 10· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.6%Ranked 14th▼ 11· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.4%Ranked 16th▼ 6· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.68%Ranked 21st▼ 12· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, female (household survey data) (%)0.65%Ranked 20th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, male (household survey data) (%)0.7%Ranked 20th▼ 11· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.5%Ranked 20th▼ 11· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, poorest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.47%Ranked 18th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, poorest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0.52%Ranked 19th▼ 10· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (household survey data) (%)0.18%Ranked 20th▼ 10· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, richest quintile, female (household survey data) (%)0.34%Ranked 18th▼ 12· 2020
- Percentage of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, richest quintile, male (household survey data) (%)0%Ranked 18th▼ 13· 2020
- Percentage of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes (%)37.3%Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, female (%)37.7%Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, male (%)36.5%Ranked 34th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in pre-primary education, both sexes (%)31.8%Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in pre-primary education, female (%)31.8%Ranked 42nd▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in primary education, both sexes (%)38.6%Ranked 44th▼ 10· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in primary education, female (%)38.9%Ranked 44th▼ 9· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in primary education, male (%)37.8%Ranked 44th▼ 7· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, both sexes (%)35.9%Ranked 49th▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, female (%)37.1%Ranked 46th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in secondary education, male (%)34.4%Ranked 49th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, both sexes (%)33.4%Ranked 36th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, female (%)35.6%Ranked 36th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, male (%)31.3%Ranked 37th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 28th▼ 17· 2023
- Percentage of students at the end of lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, both sexes (%)80.9%Ranked 23rd—· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, female (%)79%Ranked 27th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, high socio-economic status, both sexes (%)79.3%Ranked 29th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, low socio-economic status, both sexes (%)82.3%Ranked 22nd▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of students experiencing bullying in the last 12 months in lower secondary education, male (%)82.8%Ranked 20th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, both sexes (%)90.2%Ranked 17th▼ 12· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, female (%)91.8%Ranked 15th▼ 11· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, male (%)88.8%Ranked 21st▼ 10· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, rural, both sexes (%)88.7%Ranked 22nd▼ 10· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, urban, both sexes (%)91%Ranked 11th▼ 18· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)89.5%Ranked 26th▼ 20· 2023
- Percentage of students in lower secondary education who have their first or home language as language of instruction, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)90.9%Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in early childhood education who are female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in early childhood education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in early childhood education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in ISCED 6, 7, and 8 who are female (%)31.7%Ranked 59th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are female (%)60%Ranked 70th▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)60.8%Ranked 31st▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)60%Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, both sexes82.4Ranked 23rd· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, female86.2Ranked 21st· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in lower secondary education who received in-service training in the last 12 months by type of training, males77.9Ranked 28th· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in pre-primary education who are female (%)100%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in pre-primary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in pre-primary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who are female (%)77.4%Ranked 89th▲ 9· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)77.8%Ranked 47th▲ 14· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in primary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)77.4%Ranked 45th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education vocational programmes who are female (%)26.3%Ranked 41st▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education who are female (%)56.1%Ranked 93rd▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)57.9%Ranked 44th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in secondary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)56.1%Ranked 43rd▲ 8· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in short cycle tertiary education who are female (%)24.5%Ranked 48th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in tertiary education who are female (%)30.4%Ranked 93rd▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are female (%)48.6%Ranked 82nd▼ 3· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are qualified according to national standards and who are female (%)51.8%Ranked 36th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of teachers in upper secondary education who are trained according to national standards and who are female (%)48.6%Ranked 31st—· 2023
- Percentage of upper secondary schools providing life skills-based HIV and sexuality education93.9Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Persistence to last grade of primary, female (% of cohort)18.5Ranked 53rd▲ 45· 2023
- Persistence to last grade of primary, male (% of cohort)18.7Ranked 53rd▲ 37· 2023
- Persistence to last grade of primary, total (% of cohort)18.6Ranked 57th▲ 46· 2023
- PISA mathematics scores for all students365.7Ranked 68th· 2022
- PISA mathematics scores for all students365.7Ranked 68th· 2022
- PISA mathematics scores for girls372.7Ranked 67th· 2022
- PISA reading scores for girls371.1Ranked 72nd· 2022
- PISA science scores for girls382Ranked 71st· 2022
- Population aged 14 years or younger (thousands)2,097.4Ranked 98th▲ 3· 2025
- Population aged 15-24 years (thousands)1,064Ranked 107th▲ 2· 2025
- Population aged 25-64 years (thousands)2,167.3Ranked 126th▲ 3· 2025
- Population aged 65 years or older (thousands)211.7Ranked 134th▲ 3· 2025
- Population growth (annual %)2.4Ranked 36th▼ 5· 2024
- Population of compulsory school age, both sexes (number)1.36MRanked 79th▼ 12· 2025
- Population of compulsory school age, female (number)670,486Ranked 79th▼ 12· 2025
- Population of compulsory school age, male (number)692,569Ranked 79th▼ 12· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, both sexes (number)143,626Ranked 84th▼ 11· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, female (number)70,110Ranked 84th▼ 11· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to primary education, male (number)73,516Ranked 84th▼ 9· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, both sexes (number)138,014Ranked 84th▼ 14· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, female (number)67,712Ranked 84th▼ 15· 2025
- Population of the official entrance age to secondary general education, male (number)70,302Ranked 85th▼ 13· 2025
- Population - Scenario: SSP2 - Sex: All - Age: 15+ - Education: None20,700Ranked 95th▼ 2· 2100
- Post Secondary5.45MRanked 81st—· 2100
- Poverty headcount ratio at $3.20 a day (PPP) (% of population)6.1%Ranked 20th▼ 3· 2023
- PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $)0.59Ranked 162nd▼ 15· 2024
- PPP conversion factor, private consumption (LCU per international $)0.79Ranked 130th▼ 28· 2024
- Preprimary education, duration (years)2Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Price level ratio of PPP conversion factor (GDP) to market exchange rate0.59Ranked 55th▼ 8· 2024
- Primary completion rate, female (% of relevant age group)90.3Ranked 95th▲ 2· 2023
- Primary completion rate, male (% of relevant age group)92Ranked 88th▲ 7· 2023
- Primary education, duration (years)4Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Primary education, pupils514,700Ranked 92nd—· 2023
- Primary education, pupils (% female)49Ranked 32nd▼ 16· 2018
- Primary education, teachers25,038Ranked 90th▲ 3· 2023
- Primary education, teachers (% female)77.4Ranked 89th▲ 9· 2023
- Primary net attendance rate98.5%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Primary school98%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Primary school90%Ranked 28th▲ 16· 2023
- Primary school99.8%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2023
- Primary school99.2%Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2023
- Primary school starting age (years)6Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Progression to secondary school (%)97Ranked 36th▼ 14· 2017
- Progression to secondary school, female (%)97.5Ranked 30th▼ 29· 2017
- Progression to secondary school, male (%)96.5Ranked 28th▲ 27· 2017
- Proportion of 15-24 year-olds enrolled in vocational education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 44th▼ 10· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, both sexes (%)4%Ranked 82nd▲ 5· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, female (%)3.7%Ranked 78th▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of 15- to 24-year-olds enrolled in vocational education, male (%)4.3%Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2023
- Proportion of children aged 24-59 months who are developmentally on track in health, learning and psychosocial well-being, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of children aged 24-59 months who are developmentally on track in health, learning and psychosocial well-being, both sexes (%)83.9%Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of children aged 24-59 months who are developmentally on track in health, learning and psychosocial well-being, female (%)86.2%Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of children aged 24-59 months who are developmentally on track in health, learning and psychosocial well-being, male (%)81.7%Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of children aged 36−59 months who are developmentally on track in at least three of the following domains: literacy-numeracy, physical development, social-emotional development, and learning (% of children aged 36-59 months) - 36 to 59 months old - Both sexes83.9%Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, both sexes (%)14.7%Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, female (%)16.9%Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in mathematics, male (%)12.8%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, both sexes (%)21.3%Ranked 64th· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, female (%)30.4%Ranked 61st· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of lower secondary education prepared for the future in reading, male (%)11.3%Ranked 67th· 2022
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, both sexes (%)30.8%Ranked 36th· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, female (%)32.4%Ranked 35th· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in mathematics, male (%)29.5%Ranked 35th· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 4th· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, both sexes (%)42.1%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, female (%)51.5%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of children/young people at the age of primary education prepared for the future in reading, male (%)34.1%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities (%)71.7%Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to basic drinking water (%)99.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)96.2%Ranked 13th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to electricity (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)99.1%Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with basic handwashing facilities (%)99.7%Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of lower secondary schools with single-sex basic sanitation facilities (%)99.9%Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities (%)65.2%Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to basic drinking water (%)99.1%Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)90%Ranked 20th▲ 7· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to electricity (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)98%Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with basic handwashing facilities (%)99.2%Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2023
- Proportion of primary schools with single-sex basic sanitation facilities (%)99.8%Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.55Ranked 19th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.2Ranked 12th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 11th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.5Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.1Ranked 7th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.91Ranked 9th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.8Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.3Ranked 7th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.72Ranked 5th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.54Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.3Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.7Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0Ranked 6th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.3Ranked 13th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)0.61Ranked 6th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.66Ranked 6th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.43Ranked 20th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 8th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.7Ranked 4th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.26Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.51Ranked 7th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in lower secondary general education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 15th▲ 6· 2023
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 44th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 34· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.94Ranked 22nd▼ 13· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.5Ranked 17th▲ 11· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.2Ranked 7th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.38Ranked 10th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.8Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.5Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)0.72Ranked 6th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, primary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, primary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.3Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.91Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, primary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.8Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.7Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)1.4Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (household survey data) (LPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)1.7Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.1Ranked 15th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.3Ranked 5th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)0.95Ranked 6th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, adjusted gender parity index (household survey data) (GPIA)0.93Ranked 5th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.6Ranked 8th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)1.3Ranked 7th· 2020
- Proportion of pupils enrolled in primary education who are at least 2 years over-age for their current grade, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (household survey data) (WPIA)2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Proportion of qualified teachers in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in pre-primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 18th▲ 7· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of qualified teachers in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of secondary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)95.9%Ranked 15th▼ 12· 2023
- Proportion of secondary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)98.9%Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.37Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.56Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.92Ranked 3rd▼ 9· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.56Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, both sexes (%)15.7%Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)8.8%Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, female (%)17.1%Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, immigrant background, both sexes (%)14.6%Ranked 8th▼ 5· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, male (%)14.5%Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)15.9%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, rural areas, both sexes (%)8.4%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)15.9%Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, urban areas, both sexes (%)22.6%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)20.2%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)11.2%Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted native parity index (NPIA)0.6Ranked 57th· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.82Ranked 24th· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.35Ranked 63rd· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, both sexes (%)22.9%Ranked 74th· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)19.4%Ranked 66th· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, female (%)30.9%Ranked 69th· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, immigrant background, both sexes (%)14.4%Ranked 72nd· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, male (%)12.9%Ranked 74th· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, non-immigrant background, both sexes (%)24.2%Ranked 73rd· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)23.7%Ranked 73rd· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very affluent socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)44.7%Ranked 74th· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of lower secondary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, very poor socioeconomic background, both sexes (%)15.6%Ranked 71st· 2022
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.46Ranked 37th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.4Ranked 46th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, both sexes (%)30.9%Ranked 47th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)13.6%Ranked 47th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, female (%)32.5%Ranked 45th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, male (%)29.7%Ranked 49th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, rural areas, both sexes (%)14.9%Ranked 37th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)33.6%Ranked 41st· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in mathematics, urban areas, both sexes (%)32.1%Ranked 36th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.82Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, adjusted speaks language of the test parity index (LTPIA)0.43Ranked 4th· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, both sexes (%)42.3%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, did not speak the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)20.1%Ranked 2nd· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, female (%)51.6%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, male (%)34.3%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, rural areas, both sexes (%)35%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, spoke the language of the test at home, both sexes (%)46.3%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of students at the end of primary education achieving at least a minimum proficiency level in reading, urban areas, both sexes (%)42.4%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 27th▲ 9· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in lower secondary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in pre-primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in pre-primary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in pre-primary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in pre-primary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2007
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 41st▲ 6· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in primary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 42nd▲ 11· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in secondary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 24th▲ 6· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of teachers with the minimum required qualifications in upper secondary education, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to adapted infrastructure and materials for students with disabilities (%)75.7%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to basic drinking water (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to computers for pedagogical purposes (%)95.5%Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to electricity (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with access to Internet for pedagogical purposes (%)98.7%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with basic handwashing facilities (%)99.8%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Proportion of upper secondary schools with single-sex basic sanitation facilities (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that changed privacy settings on your device, account or app to limit the sharing of personal data and information (e.g. name, contact information, photos), both sexes (%)17.4%Ranked 24th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 7th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)9.4%Ranked 34th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, female (%)10.5%Ranked 33rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 15-24 years old, male (%)8.3%Ranked 34th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 32nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)5.1%Ranked 32nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, female (%)4%Ranked 32nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 25-74 years old, male (%)6.2%Ranked 31st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 7th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), 75 years old or over, male (%)0.6%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 22nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), both sexes (%)8.9%Ranked 43rd▼ 21· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), female (%)5.9%Ranked 38th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), male (%)6.2%Ranked 39th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.81Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, both sexes (%)5.7%Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, female (%)6.1%Ranked 25th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), rural, male (%)5.2%Ranked 25th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)4%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, female (%)5.1%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), under 15 years old, male (%)2.9%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, both sexes (%)6.1%Ranked 32nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, female (%)5.8%Ranked 30th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that created electronic presentations with presentation software (including text, images, sound, video or charts), urban, male (%)6.4%Ranked 30th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.54Ranked 38th▼ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)2.2%Ranked 34th▼ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, female (%)1.5%Ranked 35th▼ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 15-24 years old, male (%)2.8%Ranked 32nd▼ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.4Ranked 37th▼ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)2.5%Ranked 35th▼ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, female (%)1.4%Ranked 34th▼ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 25-74 years old, male (%)3.5%Ranked 35th▼ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.5%Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, 75 years old or over, male (%)1.3%Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.46Ranked 40th▼ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.81Ranked 14th▲ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, both sexes (%)3.2%Ranked 53rd▲ 16· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, female (%)1.3%Ranked 38th▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.5Ranked 22nd▲ 20· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, male (%)2.8%Ranked 37th▼ 11· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.26Ranked 31st▲ 21· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, both sexes (%)1.7%Ranked 28th▲ 18· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, female (%)0.7%Ranked 28th▲ 18· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, rural, male (%)2.7%Ranked 27th▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.7Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.5%Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, female (%)0.7%Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, under 15 years old, male (%)0.2%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.5Ranked 32nd▲ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, both sexes (%)2.1%Ranked 33rd▲ 18· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, female (%)1.4%Ranked 29th▲ 16· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that did Internet banking, urban, male (%)2.8%Ranked 31st▲ 18· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)6.9%Ranked 30th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, female (%)7.2%Ranked 30th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 15-24 years old, male (%)6.7%Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.53Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)4.2%Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, female (%)2.9%Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 25-74 years old, male (%)5.5%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.13Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1.5%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.4%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, 75 years old or over, male (%)3%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.79Ranked 21st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.37Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, both sexes (%)9.2%Ranked 52nd▼ 13· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, female (%)4.1%Ranked 31st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.28Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, male (%)5.2%Ranked 36th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.4Ranked 21st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, both sexes (%)1.9%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, female (%)1.3%Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, rural, male (%)2.3%Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)2.8%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, female (%)3.5%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, under 15 years old, male (%)2.1%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 13th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, both sexes (%)5.2%Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, female (%)4.6%Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that found, downloaded, installed and configured sofware and apps, urban, male (%)5.7%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 36th▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)45.6%Ranked 29th▼ 16· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, female (%)43.2%Ranked 30th▼ 16· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 15-24 years old, male (%)47.9%Ranked 26th▼ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.96Ranked 24th▼ 26· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)35.8%Ranked 27th▼ 21· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, female (%)35.1%Ranked 28th▼ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 25-74 years old, male (%)36.4%Ranked 26th▼ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.19Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)2.7%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, female (%)1%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, 75 years old or over, male (%)5.2%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 28th▼ 24· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, both sexes (%)42.9%Ranked 42nd▲ 11· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, female (%)33.1%Ranked 30th▼ 18· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, male (%)35.1%Ranked 31st▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 22nd▲ 8· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, both sexes (%)34.1%Ranked 22nd▲ 11· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, female (%)33.9%Ranked 21st▲ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, rural, male (%)34.3%Ranked 20th▲ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▼ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)11.8%Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, female (%)12.4%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, under 15 years old, male (%)11.1%Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 26th▲ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, both sexes (%)34.1%Ranked 27th▲ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, female (%)33%Ranked 26th▲ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that got information about goods or services, urban, male (%)35.3%Ranked 25th▲ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.88Ranked 34th▼ 8· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)67.5%Ranked 28th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, female (%)63%Ranked 30th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 15-24 years old, male (%)71.9%Ranked 23rd—· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 22nd▼ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)55%Ranked 16th▼ 11· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, female (%)54.9%Ranked 14th▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 25-74 years old, male (%)55.2%Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.73Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)9.8%Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, female (%)8.5%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), 75 years old or over, male (%)11.6%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 34th▼ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), both sexes (%)71.4%Ranked 24th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), female (%)51.5%Ranked 20th▼ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), male (%)55.2%Ranked 19th▼ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 29th▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, both sexes (%)56.5%Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, female (%)52.1%Ranked 11th▲ 7· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), rural, male (%)60.7%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.84Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)27.5%Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, female (%)25.1%Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), under 15 years old, male (%)29.8%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.95Ranked 26th▲ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, both sexes (%)52.8%Ranked 21st▲ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, female (%)51.4%Ranked 21st▲ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that made calls (telephoning over the Internet/VoIP, using Skype, Whatsapp, Viber, iTalk, etc.; includes video calls via webcam), urban, male (%)54.2%Ranked 20th▲ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.84Ranked 35th▼ 11· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)61.7%Ranked 35th▼ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, female (%)56.4%Ranked 34th▼ 6· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 15-24 years old, male (%)66.9%Ranked 35th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.97Ranked 25th▼ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)49.3%Ranked 23rd▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, female (%)48.6%Ranked 26th▼ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 25-74 years old, male (%)50.1%Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)5.5%Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, female (%)4.7%Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, 75 years old or over, male (%)6.7%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 37th▼ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, both sexes (%)50.7%Ranked 43rd▲ 10· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, female (%)44.8%Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, male (%)50.1%Ranked 31st▲ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.86Ranked 29th▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, both sexes (%)46.3%Ranked 22nd▲ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, female (%)42.7%Ranked 22nd▲ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, rural, male (%)49.7%Ranked 17th▲ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.65Ranked 11th—· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)20.8%Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, female (%)16.3%Ranked 11th▲ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, under 15 years old, male (%)25.1%Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 29th▲ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, both sexes (%)47.7%Ranked 30th▲ 23· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, female (%)45.1%Ranked 30th▲ 21· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that participated in social networks, urban, male (%)50.2%Ranked 28th▲ 23· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)4.4%Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, female (%)5.2%Ranked 13th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 15-24 years old, male (%)3.6%Ranked 20th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)2.6%Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, female (%)1.9%Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 25-74 years old, male (%)3.3%Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), 75 years old or over, male (%)0.6%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.32Ranked 21st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), both sexes (%)2.9%Ranked 37th▼ 5· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), female (%)2.6%Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.31Ranked 20th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), male (%)2.9%Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.34Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.82Ranked 7th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, both sexes (%)1%Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, female (%)0.9%Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), rural, male (%)1.1%Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, female (%)1.2%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), under 15 years old, male (%)0.5%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.91Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, both sexes (%)3.1%Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, female (%)2.9%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that programmed or coded in digital environments (e.g. computer software, app development), urban, male (%)3.2%Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 12th▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)14.6%Ranked 29th▼ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, female (%)15%Ranked 30th▼ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 15-24 years old, male (%)14.2%Ranked 30th▼ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.73Ranked 31st▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)12%Ranked 28th▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, female (%)10.1%Ranked 29th▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 25-74 years old, male (%)13.8%Ranked 28th▼ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.43Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)2%Ranked 9th▼ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, female (%)1.3%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, 75 years old or over, male (%)3%Ranked 9th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.89Ranked 26th▼ 16· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.51Ranked 23rd▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, both sexes (%)13%Ranked 42nd▲ 10· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, female (%)10.6%Ranked 32nd▼ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.5Ranked 22nd▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, male (%)11.9%Ranked 32nd▼ 8· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.52Ranked 21st▲ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.85Ranked 19th▲ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, both sexes (%)6.2%Ranked 24th▲ 21· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, female (%)5.7%Ranked 23rd▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, rural, male (%)6.7%Ranked 23rd▲ 20· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st▼ 7· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)4%Ranked 8th—· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, female (%)6%Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, under 15 years old, male (%)2.2%Ranked 10th▲ 7· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.9Ranked 22nd▲ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, both sexes (%)12.1%Ranked 27th▲ 20· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, female (%)11.5%Ranked 24th▲ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that read or downloaded newspapers, magazines or electronic books in digital format, urban, male (%)12.8%Ranked 25th▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.81Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)15.9%Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, female (%)14.1%Ranked 18th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 15-24 years old, male (%)17.5%Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.56Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)11%Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, female (%)7.8%Ranked 18th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 25-74 years old, male (%)14%Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.4Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)2.8%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, female (%)1.7%Ranked 7th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), 75 years old or over, male (%)4.3%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 23rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.79Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), both sexes (%)34.5%Ranked 26th▼ 19· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), female (%)9.3%Ranked 23rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.68Ranked 7th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), male (%)13.3%Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.87Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.56Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, both sexes (%)9.2%Ranked 16th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, female (%)6.6%Ranked 18th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), rural, male (%)11.7%Ranked 15th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)5.6%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, female (%)7%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), under 15 years old, male (%)4.2%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.72Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, both sexes (%)11.7%Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, female (%)9.7%Ranked 20th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sent messages (e.g. e-mail, messaging service, SMS) with attached files (e.g. document, picture, video), urban, male (%)13.5%Ranked 20th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that set up effective security measures (e.g. strong passwords, log-in attempt notification) to protect devices and online accounts, both sexes (%)18.6%Ranked 13th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 21st▲ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)47.9%Ranked 18th▲ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, female (%)52.8%Ranked 21st▲ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 15-24 years old, male (%)43.2%Ranked 15th▲ 8· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 17th▲ 7· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)42.3%Ranked 19th▲ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, female (%)46%Ranked 19th▲ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 25-74 years old, male (%)38.8%Ranked 19th▲ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.4Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)5.4%Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, female (%)3.4%Ranked 7th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), 75 years old or over, male (%)8.4%Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 17th▲ 11· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 6th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), both sexes (%)41.5%Ranked 40th▲ 18· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), female (%)42.8%Ranked 22nd▲ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.89Ranked 12th▲ 8· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), male (%)35.1%Ranked 21st▲ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 20th▲ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, both sexes (%)35.8%Ranked 16th▲ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, female (%)38.5%Ranked 13th▲ 8· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), rural, male (%)33.2%Ranked 15th▲ 11· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd—· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)14.5%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, female (%)18.8%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), under 15 years old, male (%)10.5%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 13th▲ 7· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, both sexes (%)39.4%Ranked 18th▲ 11· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, female (%)43.5%Ranked 17th▲ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that sought health related information (on injury, disease, nutrition, etc.), urban, male (%)35.4%Ranked 16th▲ 10· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.38Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)8.2%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, female (%)4.5%Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 15-24 years old, male (%)11.8%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.53Ranked 25th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)6.4%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, female (%)4.4%Ranked 15th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 25-74 years old, male (%)8.3%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)2.1%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, 75 years old or over, male (%)5.2%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.48Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, both sexes (%)5.9%Ranked 29th▲ 14· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, female (%)3.9%Ranked 18th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.63Ranked 13th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, male (%)8.2%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.3Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.23Ranked 22nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, both sexes (%)7%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, female (%)2.6%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, rural, male (%)11.2%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.52Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, female (%)1.2%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, under 15 years old, male (%)2.3%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.53Ranked 21st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, both sexes (%)5.9%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, female (%)4.1%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that took part in consultation or voting via Internet to define civic or political issues, urban, male (%)7.7%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)11.3%Ranked 30th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, female (%)10.9%Ranked 30th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 15-24 years old, male (%)11.7%Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.44Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)6.7%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, female (%)4.1%Ranked 28th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 25-74 years old, male (%)9.3%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.11Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.4%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, 75 years old or over, male (%)3.7%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.71Ranked 31st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.72Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, both sexes (%)11.2%Ranked 49th▼ 7· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, female (%)6.3%Ranked 32nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.77Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, male (%)8.9%Ranked 33rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.7Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.77Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, both sexes (%)5.7%Ranked 22nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, female (%)5%Ranked 22nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, rural, male (%)6.5%Ranked 21st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)4.9%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, female (%)7%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, under 15 years old, male (%)2.9%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.7Ranked 22nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, both sexes (%)7.9%Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, female (%)6.5%Ranked 25th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used basic arithmetic formula in spreadsheet, urban, male (%)9.3%Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)22.5%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, female (%)24.5%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 15-24 years old, male (%)20.6%Ranked 28th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.63Ranked 28th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)11.9%Ranked 29th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, female (%)9.2%Ranked 28th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 25-74 years old, male (%)14.6%Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), 75 years old or over, male (%)4.3%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.74Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), both sexes (%)29.3%Ranked 39th▼ 13· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), female (%)14.3%Ranked 31st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.73Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), male (%)15.4%Ranked 32nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.74Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, both sexes (%)11.4%Ranked 25th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, female (%)10.9%Ranked 25th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), rural, male (%)11.9%Ranked 24th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)13.2%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, female (%)16.6%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), under 15 years old, male (%)10%Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.93Ranked 10th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, both sexes (%)15.5%Ranked 26th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, female (%)14.9%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used copy and paste tools to duplicate or move data, information and content in digital environments (e.g. within a document, between devices, on the cloud), urban, male (%)16%Ranked 27th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.94Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)5.1%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, female (%)4.9%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 15-24 years old, male (%)5.2%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.64Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)2.9%Ranked 7th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, female (%)2.3%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 25-74 years old, male (%)3.6%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)1%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, female (%)1.3%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, 75 years old or over, male (%)0.6%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.83Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.6Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, both sexes (%)6%Ranked 16th▲ 8· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, female (%)3%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.29Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, male (%)3.6%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.86Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.31Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, both sexes (%)2.1%Ranked 6th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, female (%)1%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, rural, male (%)3.2%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)1.9%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, female (%)2.6%Ranked 1st· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, under 15 years old, male (%)1.1%Ranked 2nd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.92Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, both sexes (%)3.5%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, female (%)3.4%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that used software run over the Internet for editing text documents, spreadsheets or presentations, urban, male (%)3.7%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic communication and collaboration skills, both sexes (%)55.6%Ranked 29th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic digital content creation skills, both sexes (%)28.1%Ranked 24th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic information and data literacy skills, both sexes (%)39.6%Ranked 30th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic problem sovling skills, both sexes (%)9.7%Ranked 33rd· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have above basic safety skills, both sexes (%)13.5%Ranked 17th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic communication and collaboration skills, both sexes (%)20.6%Ranked 8th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic digital content creation skills, both sexes (%)18%Ranked 20th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic information and data literacy skills, both sexes (%)17.9%Ranked 6th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic problem sovling skills, both sexes (%)14.1%Ranked 23rd· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have basic safety skills, both sexes (%)9%Ranked 15th· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 18th▲ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 30th▲ 29· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, female (%)1.8%Ranked 30th▲ 28· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 15-24 years old, male (%)1.8%Ranked 29th▲ 28· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.33Ranked 29th▲ 21· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 29th▲ 27· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, female (%)0.4%Ranked 25th▲ 23· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 25-74 years old, male (%)1.2%Ranked 28th▲ 26· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, female (%)2.7%Ranked 1st· 2014
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), 75 years old or over, male (%)0.6%Ranked 4th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.58Ranked 32nd▲ 27· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.09Ranked 29th▲ 28· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), both sexes (%)1.8%Ranked 47th▲ 19· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), female (%)0.7%Ranked 28th▲ 26· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 1st· 2014
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), male (%)1.2%Ranked 28th▲ 27· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.07Ranked 28th▲ 27· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 5th· 2014
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, both sexes (%)0.1%Ranked 26th▲ 25· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, female (%)24.8%Ranked 1st· 2014
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), rural, male (%)0.1%Ranked 24th▲ 23· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 11th· 2014
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.2%Ranked 8th▲ 6· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, female (%)40.1%Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), under 15 years old, male (%)0.4%Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.57Ranked 26th▲ 23· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, both sexes (%)1.1%Ranked 26th▲ 25· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, female (%)0.8%Ranked 28th▲ 27· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have done online course (in any subject), urban, male (%)1.4%Ranked 28th▲ 27· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 21st▼ 26· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)6.8%Ranked 30th▼ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, female (%)7%Ranked 31st▼ 14· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 15-24 years old, male (%)6.7%Ranked 32nd▼ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 4th▼ 46· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)5.2%Ranked 29th▼ 17· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, female (%)5.9%Ranked 31st▼ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, 25-74 years old, male (%)4.6%Ranked 32nd▼ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 7th▼ 42· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, both sexes (%)10.4%Ranked 48th▲ 13· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, female (%)5.2%Ranked 34th▼ 13· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, male (%)4.4%Ranked 34th▼ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, both sexes (%)5.8%Ranked 24th▲ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, female (%)6.6%Ranked 21st▲ 12· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, rural, male (%)4.9%Ranked 23rd▲ 15· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.5Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)0.4%Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, female (%)0.6%Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, under 15 years old, male (%)0.3%Ranked 14th▲ 7· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, both sexes (%)4.7%Ranked 32nd▲ 19· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, female (%)5%Ranked 29th▲ 16· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have purchased or ordered goods or services, urban, male (%)4.3%Ranked 29th▲ 18· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults who have verified the reliability of information found online, both sexes (%)14.4%Ranked 33rd· 2023
- Public spending on education as a share of GDP5.4%Ranked 40th▼ 20· 2021
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in lower secondary (headcount basis)48.5Ranked 11th▲ 6· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in pre-primary education (headcount basis)52.2Ranked 15th▲ 7· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in primary education53.2Ranked 15th▲ 6· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in primary education (headcount basis)53.2Ranked 15th▲ 6· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in secondary (headcount basis)47.6Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2023
- Pupil-qualified teacher ratio in upper secondary (headcount basis)45.8Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2023
- Pupil-teacher ratio, lower secondary18.6Ranked 22nd—· 2018
- Pupil-teacher ratio, preprimary16.7Ranked 39th▼ 9· 2018
- Pupil-teacher ratio, primary24.5Ranked 34th▼ 7· 2018
- Pupil-teacher ratio, secondary17.3Ranked 26th▲ 1· 2018
- Pupil-teacher ratio, tertiary27.9Ranked 7th▼ 6· 2018
- Pupil-teacher ratio, upper secondary15Ranked 27th▼ 8· 2018
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in lower secondary education (headcount basis)18.1Ranked 35th▲ 7· 2023
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in pre-primary education (headcount basis)16.6Ranked 51st▲ 7· 2023
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in primary education (headcount basis)20.6Ranked 54th▲ 4· 2023
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in secondary education (headcount basis)17.1Ranked 41st▲ 9· 2023
- Pupil-trained teacher ratio in upper secondary education (headcount basis)15.3Ranked 29th▲ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)729Ranked 72nd▼ 22· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, female (number)326Ranked 70th▼ 22· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, male (number)403Ranked 73rd▼ 20· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, both sexes (number)105Ranked 93rd▲ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, female (number)39Ranked 91st▲ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 1 of primary education, male (number)66Ranked 91st▼ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)792Ranked 71st▼ 21· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, female (number)388Ranked 69th▼ 21· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, male (number)404Ranked 71st▼ 24· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, both sexes (number)67Ranked 94th▼ 25· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, female (number)24Ranked 95th▼ 18· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 2 of primary education, male (number)43Ranked 93rd▼ 23· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)1,053Ranked 64th▼ 19· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, female (number)495Ranked 62nd▼ 25· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, male (number)558Ranked 63rd▼ 18· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, both sexes (number)56Ranked 94th▼ 26· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, female (number)18Ranked 95th▼ 14· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 3 of primary education, male (number)38Ranked 93rd▼ 21· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)949Ranked 23rd▼ 15· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of lower secondary general education, female (number)461Ranked 23rd▼ 14· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of lower secondary general education, male (number)488Ranked 25th▼ 11· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (number)78Ranked 92nd▼ 28· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, female (number)28Ranked 91st▼ 17· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 4 of primary education, male (number)50Ranked 91st▼ 27· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)778Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of lower secondary general education, female (number)392Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 5 of lower secondary general education, male (number)386Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)1,506Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of lower secondary general education, female (number)847Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Repeaters in Grade 6 of lower secondary general education, male (number)659Ranked 1st—· 2017
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, female (number)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of lower secondary general education, male (number)0Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, female (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in grade unknown of primary education, male (number)0Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2023
- Repeaters in lower secondary general education, all grades, both sexes (number)4,301Ranked 65th▼ 21· 2023
- Repeaters in lower secondary general education, all grades, female (number)2,062Ranked 64th▼ 21· 2023
- Repeaters in lower secondary general education, all grades, male (number)2,239Ranked 66th▼ 21· 2023
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, both sexes (number)306Ranked 100th▼ 18· 2023
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, female (number)109Ranked 101st▼ 16· 2023
- Repeaters in primary education, all grades, male (number)197Ranked 98th▼ 21· 2023
- Repeaters, primary, female (% of female enrollment)0.04Ranked 74th▼ 40· 2018
- Repeaters, primary, male (% of male enrollment)0.1Ranked 70th▼ 48· 2018
- Repeaters, primary, total (% of total enrollment)0.07Ranked 73rd▼ 43· 2018
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)0.19%Ranked 80th▼ 4· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, female (%)0.16%Ranked 76th▼ 1· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of lower secondary general education, male (%)0.22%Ranked 78th▼ 5· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, both sexes (%)0.06%Ranked 79th▼ 13· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, female (%)0.06%Ranked 78th▼ 10· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 1 of primary education, male (%)0.06%Ranked 78th▼ 9· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)0.25%Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, female (%)0.22%Ranked 75th▲ 7· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of lower secondary general education, male (%)0.28%Ranked 77th—· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, both sexes (%)0.03%Ranked 81st▼ 8· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 86th—· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 2 of primary education, male (%)0.06%Ranked 81st▼ 3· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)0.27%Ranked 76th▲ 15· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, female (%)0.21%Ranked 72nd▲ 19· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of lower secondary general education, male (%)0.32%Ranked 72nd▲ 9· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 86th▼ 1· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 84th—· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 3 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 85th▲ 2· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)0.32%Ranked 32nd▲ 7· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of lower secondary general education, female (%)0.29%Ranked 30th▲ 6· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of lower secondary general education, male (%)0.34%Ranked 32nd▲ 5· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 83rd▼ 3· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, female (%)0%Ranked 77th▼ 6· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 4 of primary education, male (%)0%Ranked 79th▼ 2· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of lower secondary general education, both sexes (%)0.28%Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of lower secondary general education, female (%)0.23%Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2023
- Repetition rate in Grade 5 of lower secondary general education, male (%)0.33%Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2023
- Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), both sexes (%)0.26%Ranked 81st▼ 4· 2023
- Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), female (%)0.22%Ranked 80th▲ 3· 2023
- Repetition rate in lower secondary general education (all grades), male (%)0.3%Ranked 81st▼ 5· 2023
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), both sexes (%)0.02%Ranked 87th▼ 13· 2023
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), female (%)0.02%Ranked 87th▼ 14· 2023
- Repetition rate in primary education (all grades), male (%)0.03%Ranked 88th▼ 10· 2023
- Rural population (% of total population)22.1%Ranked 146th▼ 1· 2024
- School age population, early childhood education, both sexes (number)285,913Ranked 97th▼ 24· 2025
- School age population, early childhood education, female (number)139,580Ranked 97th▼ 24· 2025
- School age population, early childhood education, male (number)146,333Ranked 97th▼ 23· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, both sexes (number)142,489Ranked 84th▼ 14· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, female (number)69,737Ranked 84th▼ 14· 2025
- School age population, last grade of primary education, male (number)72,752Ranked 84th▼ 13· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, both sexes (number)665,620Ranked 73rd▼ 10· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, female (number)328,553Ranked 73rd▼ 9· 2025
- School age population, lower secondary education, male (number)337,067Ranked 73rd▼ 11· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, both sexes (number)143,200Ranked 85th▼ 10· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, female (number)69,906Ranked 85th▼ 10· 2025
- School age population, one year before the official primary entry age, male (number)73,294Ranked 85th▼ 10· 2025
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, both sexes (number)110,950Ranked 65th▼ 12· 2025
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, female (number)55,869Ranked 65th▼ 11· 2025
- School age population, post-secondary non-tertiary education, male (number)55,081Ranked 67th▼ 13· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, both sexes (number)285,913Ranked 90th▼ 16· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, female (number)139,580Ranked 90th▼ 16· 2025
- School age population, pre-primary education, male (number)146,333Ranked 90th▼ 16· 2025
- School age population, primary education, both sexes (number)574,936Ranked 91st▼ 16· 2025
- School age population, primary education, female (number)280,841Ranked 90th▼ 16· 2025
- School age population, primary education, male (number)294,095Ranked 91st▼ 16· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, both sexes (number)1.02MRanked 80th▼ 10· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, female (number)505,666Ranked 81st▼ 9· 2025
- School age population, secondary education, male (number)513,797Ranked 80th▼ 11· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, both sexes (number)521,729Ranked 89th▼ 18· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, female (number)263,758Ranked 89th▼ 13· 2025
- School age population, tertiary education, male (number)257,971Ranked 90th▼ 18· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, both sexes (number)353,843Ranked 85th▼ 17· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, female (number)177,113Ranked 83rd▼ 17· 2025
- School age population, upper secondary education, male (number)176,730Ranked 85th▼ 20· 2025
- School enrollment, preprimary, female (% gross)50.4Ranked 37th▼ 59· 2021
- School enrollment, preprimary (% gross)49.5Ranked 38th▼ 60· 2021
- School enrollment, preprimary, male (% gross)48.6Ranked 39th▼ 57· 2021
- School enrollment, primary and secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1.1Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2021
- School enrollment, primary, female (% gross)91Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2023
- School enrollment, primary, female (% net)95Ranked 8th▼ 17· 2018
- School enrollment, primary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)0.99Ranked 32nd▼ 45· 2021
- School enrollment, primary, male (% gross)91.8Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2023
- School enrollment, primary, male (% net)94.6Ranked 10th▼ 13· 2018
- School enrollment, primary (% net)94.8Ranked 24th▼ 33· 2018
- School enrollment, primary, private (% of total primary)44.5Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, female (% gross)92.2Ranked 85th▼ 3· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, female (% net)91.2Ranked 11th▼ 26· 2018
- School enrollment, secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1.1Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2021
- School enrollment, secondary, male (% gross)86.1Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2023
- School enrollment, secondary, male (% net)83.4Ranked 18th▼ 41· 2018
- School enrollment, secondary (% net)87.2Ranked 16th▼ 38· 2018
- School enrollment, secondary, private (% of total secondary)29.3Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2023
- School enrollment, tertiary, female (% gross)54.8Ranked 71st▼ 4· 2023
- School enrollment, tertiary (gross), gender parity index (GPI)1.4Ranked 26th▼ 6· 2023
- School enrollment, tertiary, male (% gross)34Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 11th▲ 4· 2023
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, both sexes (years)0Ranked 83rd▲ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, female (years)0Ranked 82nd▲ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, post-secondary non-tertiary, male (years)0Ranked 81st▲ 4· 2023
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 51st▲ 19· 2023
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, both sexes (years)1.2Ranked 113th▼ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, female (years)1.2Ranked 112th▼ 5· 2023
- School life expectancy, pre-primary, male (years)1.2Ranked 113th▼ 5· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 100th—· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 56th▼ 27· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (years)8.4Ranked 105th▼ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, female (years)8.4Ranked 104th▼ 6· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and lower secondary, male (years)8.4Ranked 106th▼ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 20th▼ 12· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, both sexes (years)10.7Ranked 106th▼ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, female (years)11Ranked 96th▼ 5· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary and secondary, male (years)10.5Ranked 114th▲ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, both sexes (years)3.7Ranked 167th▲ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, female (years)3.6Ranked 166th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary, male (years)3.7Ranked 167th▲ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 15th▼ 5· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, both sexes (years)13.1Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, female (years)13.8Ranked 75th▼ 3· 2023
- School life expectancy, primary to tertiary, male (years)12.3Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 29th▼ 8· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, both sexes (years)7.1Ranked 38th▲ 1· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, female (years)7.4Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, secondary, male (years)6.8Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 34th—· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, both sexes (years)2.3Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, female (years)2.8Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- School life expectancy, tertiary, male (years)1.8Ranked 78th▲ 1· 2023
- Score on greening education in biodiversity0Ranked 100th· 2023
- Score on greening education in biodiversity (%)0Ranked 100th· 2023
- Score on greening education in climate change0Ranked 89th· 2023
- Score on greening education in climate change (%)0Ranked 89th· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability40.1Ranked 83rd· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability (%)40.1Ranked 83rd· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability, climate change, and biodiversity20.1Ranked 100th· 2023
- Score on greening education in environment and sustainability, climate change, and biodiversity (%)20.1Ranked 100th· 2023
- Secondary education, duration (years)8Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Secondary education, general pupils759,599Ranked 37th▼ 28· 2018
- Secondary education, general pupils (% female)51.7Ranked 18th▼ 16· 2018
- Secondary education, pupils868,232Ranked 67th▲ 4· 2023
- Secondary education, pupils (% female)51.4Ranked 10th▼ 6· 2018
- Secondary education, teachers50,739Ranked 66th▲ 2· 2023
- Secondary education, teachers (% female)56.1Ranked 93rd▲ 7· 2023
- Secondary education, teachers, female28,457Ranked 64th▲ 2· 2023
- Secondary education, vocational pupils5,387Ranked 52nd▼ 56· 2018
- Secondary education, vocational pupils (% female)22.6Ranked 56th▼ 59· 2018
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in lower secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in post-secondary non-tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 87th▲ 12· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)98.7%Ranked 10th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)99.2%Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)98.3%Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.49Ranked 100th▲ 9· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)1.3%Ranked 121st▲ 6· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)0.85%Ranked 108th▲ 10· 2023
- Share of all students in secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)1.7%Ranked 109th▲ 11· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)0%Ranked 28th▲ 6· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)0%Ranked 26th▲ 5· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)0%Ranked 27th▲ 6· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 10th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in short-cycle tertiary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 77th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, both sexes (%)95.9%Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, female (%)97.5%Ranked 10th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in general programmes, male (%)93.9%Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.42Ranked 104th▲ 13· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, both sexes (%)4.1%Ranked 114th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, female (%)2.5%Ranked 105th▲ 10· 2023
- Share of all students in upper secondary education enrolled in vocational programmes, male (%)6.1%Ranked 104th▲ 9· 2023
- Share of children achieving minimum math proficiency by the end of lower secondary age14.7%Ranked 7th—· 2023
- Share of children achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of lower secondary age21.3%Ranked 64th· 2022
- Share of children achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of primary age42.1%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Share of primary schools with single-sex sanitation facilities99.8%Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of primary school teachers who are women77.4%Ranked 89th▲ 9· 2023
- Share of qualified teachers in pre-primary education31.8%Ranked 43rd▼ 1· 2023
- Share of students achieving minimum math proficiency by the end of primary education30.9%Ranked 47th· 2023
- Share of students achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of lower secondary education22.9%Ranked 74th· 2022
- Share of students achieving minimum reading proficiency by the end of primary education42.3%Ranked 1st· 2023
- Share of students at the end of lower-secondary education with minimum math proficiency16%Ranked 11th▼ 56· 2023
- Share of students studying abroad14.2%Ranked 24th—· 2023
- Share of the population aged 25+ years with lower secondary education69.5%Ranked 62nd▲ 6· 2022
- Share of the population aged 25+ years with post-secondary education or higher28.6%Ranked 14th▼ 24· 2024
- Share of young women not in education, employment or training33.2%Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2022
- Share of youth not in education, employment or training25.4%Ranked 22nd▲ 4· 2022
- SSP1 scenario0.99Ranked 60th▼ 4· 2100
- Start month of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non-tertiary education)9Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2025
- Start month of the academic school year (tertiary education)1Ranked 12th▲ 8· 2023
- Start of the academic school year (pre-primary to post-secondary non tertiary education)2,024Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Start of the academic school year (tertiary education)2,023Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Student assessment0.83Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Students in lower-secondary, math16%Ranked 11th▼ 56· 2023
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 57th▲ 38· 2023
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, both sexes (%)18.6%Ranked 62nd▲ 36· 2023
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, female (%)18.5%Ranked 59th▲ 47· 2023
- Survival rate to Grade 4 of primary education, male (%)18.7%Ranked 60th▲ 34· 2023
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education,adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 52nd▲ 27· 2023
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, both sexes (%)18.6%Ranked 59th▲ 48· 2023
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, female (%)18.5%Ranked 55th▲ 47· 2023
- Survival rate to the last grade of primary education, male (%)18.7%Ranked 55th▲ 39· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from general secondary education, both sexes (%)3.8%Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from general secondary education, female (%)4.4%Ranked 15th▲ 4· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from general secondary education, male (%)2.9%Ranked 20th▲ 8· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from lower secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from lower secondary education, both sexes (%)4.5%Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from lower secondary education, female (%)5%Ranked 11th▼ 3· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from lower secondary education, male (%)3.8%Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from pre-primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)2Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Teacher attrition rate from pre-primary education, both sexes (%)46.5%Ranked 1st▼ 20· 2021
- Teacher attrition rate from pre-primary education, female (%)46.5%Ranked 1st▼ 18· 2021
- Teacher attrition rate from primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from primary education, both sexes (%)4.8%Ranked 22nd▼ 5· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from primary education, female (%)5.6%Ranked 12th▼ 11· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from primary education, male (%)2.2%Ranked 27th▼ 1· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 3rd—· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from secondary education, both sexes (%)3.8%Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from secondary education, female (%)4.5%Ranked 17th▲ 4· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from secondary education, male (%)2.8%Ranked 25th▲ 8· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from upper secondary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from upper secondary education, both sexes (%)2.3%Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from upper secondary education, female (%)3.4%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from upper secondary education, male (%)1.3%Ranked 16th—· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from vocational secondary education, both sexes (%)4.7%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from vocational secondary education, female (%)14%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2023
- Teacher attrition rate from vocational secondary education, male (%)1.3%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2023
- Teachers in lower secondary education, both sexes (number)33,215Ranked 50th▲ 1· 2023
- Teachers in lower secondary education, female (number)19,943Ranked 49th—· 2023
- Teachers in lower secondary education, male (number)13,272Ranked 48th▲ 5· 2023
- Teachers in post-secondary non-tertiary education, both sexes (number)0Ranked 35th▲ 5· 2012
- Teachers in post-secondary non-tertiary education, female (number)0Ranked 33rd▲ 4· 2012
- Teachers in post-secondary non-tertiary education, male (number)0Ranked 29th—· 2011
- Teachers in pre-primary education, both sexes (number)10,244Ranked 69th▼ 4· 2023
- Teachers in pre-primary education, female (number)10,244Ranked 66th▼ 4· 2023
- Teachers in pre-primary education, male (number)0Ranked 105th—· 2023
- Teachers in primary education, both sexes (number)25,038Ranked 90th▲ 3· 2023
- Teachers in primary education, female (number)19,369Ranked 86th▲ 3· 2023
- Teachers in primary education, male (number)5,669Ranked 82nd▲ 2· 2023
- Teachers in secondary education, both sexes (number)50,739Ranked 66th▲ 2· 2023
- Teachers in secondary education, female (number)28,457Ranked 64th▲ 2· 2023
- Teachers in secondary education, male (number)22,282Ranked 63rd▲ 4· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, both sexes (number)1,753Ranked 27th▲ 3· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, female (number)429Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 5 programmes, male (number)1,324Ranked 19th▲ 2· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7, and 8 programmes, both sexes (number)7,642Ranked 48th▲ 3· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7, and 8 programmes, female (number)2,424Ranked 47th▲ 3· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education ISCED 6, 7, and 8 programmes, male (number)5,218Ranked 42nd▲ 3· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, both sexes (number)9,395Ranked 72nd▲ 9· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, female (number)2,853Ranked 71st▲ 7· 2023
- Teachers in tertiary education programmes, male (number)6,542Ranked 59th▲ 6· 2023
- Teachers in upper secondary education, both sexes (number)17,524Ranked 57th—· 2023
- Teachers in upper secondary education, female (number)8,514Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2023
- Teachers in upper secondary education, male (number)9,010Ranked 50th▼ 3· 2023
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in public institutions (%)87.4%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2021
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in tertiary public institutions (%)60.4%Ranked 10th· 2021
- Tertiary education, academic staff (% female)30.4Ranked 93rd▲ 7· 2023
- Theoretical duration of early childhood education (years)2Ranked 6th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of lower secondary education (years)5Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of post-secondary non-tertiary education (years)1Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of pre-primary education (years)2Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of primary education (years)4Ranked 5th—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of secondary education (years)8Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Theoretical duration of upper secondary education (years)3Ranked 3rd—· 2025
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, both sexes (number)0Ranked 103rd▼ 1· 2023
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, female (number)0Ranked 96th▼ 2· 2023
- Total inbound internationally mobile students, male (number)0Ranked 96th▼ 2· 2023
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 9th—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.97Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, both sexes (%)97.1%Ranked 7th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 6th▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.97Ranked 4th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 4th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 4th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 4th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▲ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.96Ranked 9th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.97Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.95Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 4th▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.97Ranked 10th▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.95Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary education, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, female (%)98.9%Ranked 5th—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)97.1%Ranked 8th▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, fourth quintile, female (%)99.1%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, fourth quintile, male (%)95.3%Ranked 3rd▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, male (%)95.4%Ranked 10th▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.95Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, middle quintile, both sexes (%)96.9%Ranked 6th▼ 14· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, middle quintile, female (%)98.2%Ranked 1st▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, middle quintile, male (%)95.5%Ranked 2nd▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)95.7%Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, poorest quintile, female (%)98.2%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, poorest quintile, male (%)93.5%Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, richest quintile, both sexes (%)98.7%Ranked 5th▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, richest quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 1st▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, richest quintile, male (%)97.9%Ranked 2nd▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, both sexes (%)96.2%Ranked 8th▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, female (%)98.3%Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)96.9%Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)98.8%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)94.9%Ranked 3rd▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, male (%)94.3%Ranked 8th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)95.3%Ranked 8th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, middle quintile, female (%)97.4%Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, middle quintile, male (%)93.1%Ranked 3rd▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)93.8%Ranked 6th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)96.2%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)91.9%Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)98.1%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, richest quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, richest quintile, male (%)96.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)96.6%Ranked 5th▼ 14· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, second quintile, female (%)99%Ranked 1st▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, rural, second quintile, male (%)94.4%Ranked 1st▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, second quintile, both sexes (%)97.3%Ranked 4th▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, second quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, second quintile, male (%)95.2%Ranked 1st▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, both sexes (%)97.4%Ranked 10th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, female (%)99.1%Ranked 5th▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)97.2%Ranked 6th▼ 15· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)99.2%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)95.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, male (%)95.8%Ranked 13th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)97.5%Ranked 8th▼ 14· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, middle quintile, female (%)98.5%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, middle quintile, male (%)96.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)96.1%Ranked 7th▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)98.6%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)93.8%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 3rd▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, richest quintile, female (%)99.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, richest quintile, male (%)98.3%Ranked 1st▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)97.4%Ranked 6th▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, second quintile, female (%)99.5%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, lower secondary, urban, second quintile, male (%)95.3%Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, both sexes (%)98.5%Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th▼ 15· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 3rd▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.98Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 9th▼ 15· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 6th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 7th▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.98Ranked 4th▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 9th▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.98Ranked 11th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.98Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 5th▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary education, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, female (%)99.1%Ranked 5th—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)98.8%Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, fourth quintile, female (%)99.2%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, fourth quintile, male (%)98.4%Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, male (%)98%Ranked 7th▲ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, middle quintile, both sexes (%)98.5%Ranked 6th▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, middle quintile, female (%)99.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, middle quintile, male (%)97.6%Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)98.1%Ranked 7th▲ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, poorest quintile, female (%)98.6%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, poorest quintile, male (%)97.6%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, richest quintile, both sexes (%)99.4%Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, richest quintile, female (%)99.6%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, richest quintile, male (%)99.1%Ranked 3rd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, both sexes (%)98.7%Ranked 6th▲ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, female (%)99.2%Ranked 4th—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)98.3%Ranked 6th▲ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)99.7%Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)97%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, male (%)98.3%Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)99%Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, middle quintile, female (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, middle quintile, male (%)98%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)99.2%Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)98.9%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)99.5%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)99.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, richest quintile, female (%)99.1%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, richest quintile, male (%)99.6%Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)97.9%Ranked 8th▲ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, second quintile, female (%)97.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, rural, second quintile, male (%)98.3%Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, second quintile, both sexes (%)98.2%Ranked 9th▲ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, second quintile, female (%)98.7%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, second quintile, male (%)97.7%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, both sexes (%)98.5%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, female (%)99%Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)99%Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)99%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)99%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, male (%)97.9%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)98.3%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, middle quintile, female (%)99.1%Ranked 2nd▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, middle quintile, male (%)97.4%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)97.9%Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)98.5%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)97.2%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)99.4%Ranked 4th▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, richest quintile, female (%)99.8%Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, richest quintile, male (%)99%Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)98.2%Ranked 9th▲ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, second quintile, female (%)98.9%Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, primary, urban, second quintile, male (%)97.6%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 10th▲ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.83Ranked 8th▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, both sexes (%)80.3%Ranked 13th▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.93Ranked 5th▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.96Ranked 4th▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, fourth quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.94Ranked 4th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, middle quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.79Ranked 3rd▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.99Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, poorest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.92Ranked 3rd· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.9Ranked 5th▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, richest quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.8Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.89Ranked 8th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.89Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.92Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.4Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.3Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, rural, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th▲ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.91Ranked 4th▼ 13· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.95Ranked 4th▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, second quintile, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.86Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.82Ranked 13th▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.84Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, fourth quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.8Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, middle quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, poorest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, richest quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary education, urban, second quintile, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, female (%)88.2%Ranked 7th▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 3rd▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.85Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)78.7%Ranked 13th▼ 11· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, fourth quintile, female (%)91.4%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, fourth quintile, male (%)68%Ranked 3rd▼ 13· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, male (%)73.5%Ranked 14th▼ 14· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.85Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, male, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)0.82Ranked 1st▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, middle quintile, both sexes (%)75.9%Ranked 11th▼ 13· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, middle quintile, female (%)86.8%Ranked 2nd▼ 5· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, middle quintile, male (%)66.1%Ranked 3rd▼ 16· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)74.3%Ranked 9th▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, poorest quintile, female (%)81.1%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, poorest quintile, male (%)69%Ranked 1st▼ 13· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, richest quintile, both sexes (%)89.2%Ranked 10th▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, richest quintile, female (%)95.2%Ranked 1st▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, richest quintile, male (%)84%Ranked 2nd▼ 16· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, both sexes (%)76%Ranked 11th▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, female (%)88.7%Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)75%Ranked 10th▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, fourth quintile, female (%)88.7%Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, fourth quintile, male (%)64.2%Ranked 4th▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, male (%)64.4%Ranked 13th▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, middle quintile, both sexes (%)72.4%Ranked 10th▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, middle quintile, female (%)89.2%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, middle quintile, male (%)54.9%Ranked 4th▼ 15· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)73.5%Ranked 8th· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, poorest quintile, female (%)85%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, poorest quintile, male (%)64.5%Ranked 1st· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, richest quintile, both sexes (%)82.5%Ranked 9th—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, richest quintile, female (%)95.1%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, richest quintile, male (%)70.3%Ranked 3rd▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, second quintile, both sexes (%)76.1%Ranked 9th▼ 16· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, second quintile, female (%)82.3%Ranked 2nd▼ 6· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, rural, second quintile, male (%)69.2%Ranked 1st▼ 19· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, second quintile, both sexes (%)82.2%Ranked 8th▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, second quintile, female (%)85.9%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, second quintile, male (%)78.8%Ranked 1st▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, both sexes (%)81.5%Ranked 16th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, female (%)88%Ranked 11th▼ 8· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, fourth quintile, both sexes (%)80.3%Ranked 14th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, fourth quintile, female (%)92.4%Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, fourth quintile, male (%)69.7%Ranked 1st▼ 16· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, male (%)76%Ranked 17th▼ 16· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, middle quintile, both sexes (%)77.1%Ranked 14th▼ 10· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, middle quintile, female (%)85.9%Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, middle quintile, male (%)69.7%Ranked 1st▼ 12· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, poorest quintile, both sexes (%)74.4%Ranked 12th▼ 9· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, poorest quintile, female (%)80.2%Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, poorest quintile, male (%)69.9%Ranked 1st▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, richest quintile, both sexes (%)91.2%Ranked 12th▼ 14· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, richest quintile, female (%)95.2%Ranked 1st▼ 4· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, richest quintile, male (%)87.8%Ranked 1st▼ 17· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, second quintile, both sexes (%)83.3%Ranked 10th▼ 7· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, second quintile, female (%)86.6%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2020
- Total net attendance rate, upper secondary, urban, second quintile, male (%)80.4%Ranked 1st▼ 5· 2020
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 35th▼ 15· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, both sexes (%)94%Ranked 73rd▼ 3· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, female (%)94.7%Ranked 46th▼ 2· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, lower secondary, male (%)93.3%Ranked 50th▲ 3· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 84th—· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, both sexes (%)90.4%Ranked 121st▲ 5· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, female (%)90.1%Ranked 72nd▼ 2· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, primary, male (%)90.8%Ranked 68th▼ 5· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 16th▼ 2· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, both sexes (%)75.9%Ranked 95th—· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, female (%)82.1%Ranked 75th▼ 2· 2023
- Total net enrolment rate, upper secondary, male (%)69.6%Ranked 98th▲ 2· 2023
- Total official flows for scholarships, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)21.24MRanked 18th▲ 2· 2023
- Total official flows for scholarships, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)25.1Ranked 11th▼ 7· 2024
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, both sexes (UIS estimate) (number)31,786Ranked 49th▲ 4· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, female (UIS estimate) (number)12,828Ranked 50th▼ 1· 2023
- Total outbound internationally mobile tertiary students studying abroad, all countries, male (UIS estimate) (number)18,958Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2023
- Total population (thousands)5,540.5Ranked 119th▲ 2· 2025
- Trained teachers in lower secondary education, female (% of female teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in lower secondary education, male (% of male teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in lower secondary education (% of total teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in preprimary education, female (% of female teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in preprimary education, male (% of male teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2007
- Trained teachers in preprimary education (% of total teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in primary education, female (% of female teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in primary education, male (% of male teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in primary education (% of total teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in secondary education, female (% of female teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in secondary education, male (% of male teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in secondary education (% of total teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in upper secondary education, female (% of female teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in upper secondary education, male (% of male teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Trained teachers in upper secondary education (% of total teachers)100Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Upper secondary75.7%Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2023
- Volume of official development assistance flows for scholarships, constant US$23.45MRanked 11th▼ 7· 2024
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, both sexes (number)6,437Ranked 10th▼ 7· 2022
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, % female53Ranked 6th▲ 2· 2022
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, female (number)3,389Ranked 10th▼ 7· 2022
- Youth illiterate population, 15-24 years, male (number)3,048Ranked 10th▼ 7· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 6th▼ 9· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, both sexes (%)99.4%Ranked 9th▼ 2· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, female (%)99.2%Ranked 11th▼ 4· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, female, adjusted wealth parity index (WPIA)1Ranked 1st· 2019
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, male (%)99.9%Ranked 2nd▼ 8· 2024
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)1Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, poorest quintile, female (%)99.6%Ranked 2nd▼ 10· 2019
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, richest quintile, female (%)100%Ranked 1st▼ 2· 2019
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.99Ranked 14th▲ 9· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, both sexes (%)99.5%Ranked 9th▲ 1· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, female (%)99.2%Ranked 11th—· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, rural, male (%)99.7%Ranked 2nd▼ 4· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 8th▲ 3· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, both sexes (%)99.3%Ranked 13th▼ 3· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, female (%)99.4%Ranked 16th▲ 1· 2022
- Youth literacy rate, population 15-24 years, urban, male (%)99.3%Ranked 12th▲ 1· 2022
Population
- Population5.41MRanked 123rd—· 2025
- Population growth2.3%Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2025
- Urban population87.4%Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2024
- Crude birth rate26.5Ranked 45th▲ 1· 2024
- 1.3.1 - [ILO] Proportion of population covered by at least one social protection benefit, by sex (%) - SI_COV_BENFTS - Both sexes16.5%Ranked 69th▼ 28· 2022
- 16.b.1 - Proportion of population reporting having felt discriminated against, by grounds of discrimination, sex and disability (%) - VC_VOV_GDSD - No breakdown by disability - All grounds or no breakdown - All areas - Both sexes7.3%Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- <1 year0.01Ranked 92nd—· 2021
- 2G98%Ranked 31st▼ 3· 2023
- Above $10 a day3.13MRanked 41st▼ 17· 2023
- Above $10 a day1.92MRanked 60th▲ 4· 2016
- Above $40 a day179,840Ranked 48th▼ 17· 2023
- Above $40 a day179,840Ranked 48th▼ 17· 2023
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, female (% of population ages 15+)27.7Ranked 128th▲ 22· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, male (% of population ages 15+)51.2Ranked 118th▲ 13· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider (% of population ages 15+)39.6Ranked 121st▲ 10· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider (% of population ages 15+)39.6%Ranked 120th▲ 10· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, older adults (% of population ages 25+)49.1Ranked 114th▲ 11· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, poorest 40% (% of population ages 15+)33.1Ranked 116th—· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, richest 60% (% of population ages 15+)44Ranked 126th▲ 27· 2024
- Account ownership at a financial institution or with a mobile-money-service provider, young adults (% of population ages 15-24)23.4Ranked 124th▲ 20· 2024
- Adolescent birth rate (per 1,000 women aged 15-19 and 10-14 years) - 10 to 14 years old0Ranked 65th▼ 13· 2018
- Adolescent fertility rate (births per 1,000 women ages 15-19)35.3Ranked 91st▲ 1· 2024
- Adoscent birth rate42.8Ranked 43rd▼ 11· 2018
- Age dependency ratio (% of working-age population)70.8Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2025
- Age dependency ratio, old (% of working-age population)6.6Ranked 166th▲ 1· 2025
- Age dependency ratio, young (% of working-age population)64.2Ranked 37th—· 2025
- Annual change in population103,927Ranked 87th▲ 4· 2023
- Annual growth rate of the share of population in cities with 300,000 or more people-0.2%Ranked 124th▲ 117· 2020
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, bottom 40% of population (%)-0.59%Ranked 31st· 2023
- Armed forces personnel (% of total population)0%Ranked 166th▲ 1· 2020
- Average annual rate of change of the urban share0.3%Ranked 110th▲ 4· 2025
- Babies per woman, total fertility1.8Ranked 34th▲ 4· 2100
- Below $30 per day4.75MRanked 29th▼ 18· 2023
- Below $3 a day107,103Ranked 26th▼ 24· 2023
- Below working age2.05MRanked 98th▼ 1· 2022
- Birth rate27.1Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2023
- Birth rate27.1Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2023
- Birth rate27.1Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2023
- Births119.4Ranked 91st—· 2100
- Births15193.6Ranked 85th▼ 1· 2100
- CBR10.4Ranked 77th—· 2100
- CDR9Ranked 191st—· 2100
- Central death rate at birth12.9Ranked 129th▲ 13· 2023
- Central death rate at birth15.8Ranked 125th▲ 11· 2023
- Central death rate at birth12.9Ranked 129th▲ 13· 2023
- Central death rate at birth14.4Ranked 126th▲ 11· 2023
- CNMR-0.79Ranked 162nd▲ 4· 2100
- Completeness of birth registration (%)99.2Ranked 4th▼ 2· 2020
- Completeness of birth registration, female (%)98.9Ranked 4th· 2020
- Completeness of birth registration, male (%)99.4Ranked 4th· 2020
- Completeness of birth registration, rural (%)99.1Ranked 2nd—· 2020
- Completeness of birth registration, urban (%)99.2Ranked 1st▼ 3· 2020
- Contraceptive prevalence, any method (% of married women ages 15-49)57.3Ranked 7th▼ 16· 2020
- Contraceptive prevalence, any method (% of married women ages 15-49)57.3%Ranked 6th▼ 16· 2020
- Contraceptive prevalence, any modern method (% of married women ages 15-49)42.8%Ranked 8th▼ 13· 2020
- Contraceptive prevalence, any modern method (% of married women ages 15-49)42.8Ranked 8th▼ 13· 2020
- Countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Countries with migration policies to facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, by policy domain (1 = Requires further progress; 2 = Partially meets; 3 = Meets; 4 = Fully meets) - All Domains1Ranked 4th· 2021
- Couple with children71.6%Ranked 1st▼ 15· 2019
- Coverage of social insurance programs in 2nd quintile (% of population)2Ranked 28th· 2016
- Coverage of social insurance programs in 3rd quintile (% of population)3.8Ranked 26th· 2016
- Coverage of social insurance programs in 4th quintile (% of population)5.1Ranked 29th· 2016
- Coverage of social insurance programs in poorest quintile (% of population)2.2Ranked 21st· 2016
- Coverage of social insurance programs in richest quintile (% of population)5.1Ranked 29th· 2016
- Coverage of social insurance programs (% of population)3.6Ranked 30th· 2016
- Coverage of social protection and labor programs (% of population)24.4Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2016
- Coverage of social protection and labor programs (% of population)24.4%Ranked 33rd▲ 2· 2016
- Coverage of social safety net programs in 2nd quintile (% of population)29Ranked 30th▼ 1· 2016
- Coverage of social safety net programs in 3rd quintile (% of population)13.9Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2016
- Coverage of social safety net programs in 4th quintile (% of population)11.3Ranked 28th▼ 5· 2016
- Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population)45.9Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2016
- Coverage of social safety net programs in richest quintile (% of population)5.9Ranked 29th▼ 4· 2016
- Coverage of social safety net programs (% of population)21.2Ranked 31st—· 2016
- Death rate7.2Ranked 106th▲ 98· 2023
- Death rate, crude (per 1,000 people)5.9Ranked 52nd▼ 52· 2024
- Deaths103.2Ranked 114th▲ 2· 2100
- DeathsFemale50.6Ranked 114th▲ 2· 2100
- DeathsMale52.6Ranked 114th▲ 2· 2100
- Diabetes prevalence (% of population ages 20 to 79)15.5%Ranked 30th▼ 10· 2024
- DoublingTime128.1Ranked 7th▼ 2· 2077
- Effective reproductive fertility rate3.2Ranked 45th▼ 1· 2023
- Emigrant stock share (% of population)77Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Employment rate34%Ranked 177th▼ 3· 2022
- Female82.8%Ranked 127th▼ 36· 2024
- Female82.8%Ranked 127th▼ 36· 2024
- Female employment rate11.4%Ranked 178th▼ 5· 2022
- Female employment rate12.4%Ranked 90th▼ 31· 2024
- Female employment rate12.8%Ranked 69th▼ 33· 2025
- Female labor force participation rate18.2%Ranked 68th▼ 32· 2025
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2024
- Fertility rate3.3Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2024
- Fertility rate among adolescent girls aged 15 to 1936Ranked 90th▲ 2· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Fertility rate: births per woman3.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Growth rate among the total population0.56%Ranked 7th· 2023
- Historical estimates5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population0.62Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population0.62Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population0.62Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population0.62Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of female victims0.26Ranked 5th▼ 7· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims2.5Ranked 45th▲ 12· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims2.5Ranked 45th▲ 12· 2022
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population of male victims where the perpetrator is an intimate partner0Ranked 1st· 2018
- Homicide rate per 100,000 population where the weapon was a firearm0.37Ranked 27th▲ 14· 2021
- Illiterate2.1%Ranked 25th▼ 9· 2024
- IMR2.4Ranked 112th—· 2100
- InfantDeaths0.28Ranked 66th▼ 3· 2100
- International migrant stock (% of population)5Ranked 99th▲ 8· 2024
- LBsurvivingAge1119.1Ranked 92nd▲ 1· 2100
- LE1572.8Ranked 89th—· 2100
- LE15Female73.9Ranked 97th—· 2100
- LE15Male71.7Ranked 81st—· 2100
- LE6524.1Ranked 94th—· 2100
- LE65Female25.1Ranked 101st—· 2100
- LE65Male23.2Ranked 91st▲ 1· 2100
- LE8011.7Ranked 101st—· 2100
- LE80Female12.4Ranked 101st—· 2100
- LE80Male11.1Ranked 97th—· 2100
- Less than $3 a day2.1%Ranked 19th▼ 22· 2023
- LEx87.5Ranked 90th—· 2100
- LExFemale88.6Ranked 96th—· 2100
- LExMale86.5Ranked 84th—· 2100
- Life expectancy at birth, female (years)74.3Ranked 129th▼ 22· 2024
- Life expectancy at birth, male (years)65.2Ranked 159th▼ 39· 2024
- MAC29.4Ranked 179th▲ 1· 2100
- Male employment rate57.6%Ranked 146th▼ 8· 2022
- Mean age at childbearing28.6Ranked 140th▼ 5· 2023
- Median age19.8Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- Median age19.8Ranked 178th▲ 2· 2023
- MedianAgePop43.2Ranked 138th—· 2100
- Modern method42.8%Ranked 8th▼ 13· 2020
- Mortality rate, adult, female (per 1,000 female adults)100.3Ranked 95th▼ 68· 2024
- Mortality rate, adult, male (per 1,000 male adults)217.2Ranked 128th▼ 73· 2024
- Mortality rate, infant, female (per 1,000 live births)16Ranked 79th▼ 2· 2024
- Mortality rate, infant, male (per 1,000 live births)17.9Ranked 78th▼ 5· 2024
- NatChange16.2Ranked 53rd—· 2100
- NatChangeRT1.4Ranked 55th—· 2100
- Natural population growth rate2%Ranked 47th▲ 24· 2023
- Natural population growth rate2%Ranked 47th▲ 24· 2023
- Natural population growth rate2%Ranked 47th▲ 24· 2023
- Net migration-23,156Ranked 175th▼ 1· 2025
- NetMigrations-9.1Ranked 158th▲ 1· 2100
- New infections of HIV per 1,000 people0.67Ranked 28th▼ 1· 2024
- NRR0.88Ranked 56th▼ 2· 2100
- Number of 1-year-old girls70,292Ranked 97th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of births146,384Ranked 97th—· 2023
- Number of births146,384Ranked 97th—· 2023
- Number of births to women aged 50 to 544Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2023
- Number of boys under 5368,490Ranked 98th—· 2023
- Number of children under 152.08MRanked 99th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 152.08MRanked 99th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of children under 5719,902Ranked 98th—· 2023
- Number of children under 5719,902Ranked 98th—· 2023
- Number of children under 5600,680Ranked 91st—· 2100
- Number of cities with 1 to 5 million people1Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2035
- Number of cities with 300000 to 500000 people5Ranked 18th—· 2035
- Number of cities with 500000 to 1 million people0Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2035
- Number of cities with 5 to 10 million people0Ranked 7th▲ 2· 2035
- Number of cities with more than 10 million people0Ranked 5th—· 2035
- Number of cities with more than 1 million people1Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2035
- Number of deaths38,938Ranked 96th▲ 24· 2023
- Number of deaths38,938Ranked 96th▲ 24· 2023
- Number of deaths38,938Ranked 96th▲ 24· 2023
- Number of deaths38,938Ranked 96th▲ 24· 2023
- Number of deaths among people aged 100 and over9Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2023
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)0.94Ranked 24th—· 2023
- Number of emigrants4.23MRanked 18th▲ 1· 2024
- Number of girls under 5351,414Ranked 98th—· 2023
- Number of homicide victims among children (0-19) per 100,000 population4.5Ranked 11th· 2015
- Number of people aged 65 and over205,672Ranked 136th—· 2023
- Number of people aged 65 and over205,672Ranked 136th—· 2023
- Number of people aged 65 and over205,672Ranked 136th—· 2023
- Number of people in poverty ($3 a day)107,103Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2023
- Number of people in poverty ($3 a day)107,103Ranked 29th▼ 1· 2023
- Old-age dependency ratio6.6%Ranked 163rd▼ 1· 2023
- Old-age dependency ratio6.6%Ranked 163rd▼ 1· 2023
- Open defecation0Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- Outsurvival statistic at birth33.8%Ranked 198th▲ 58· 2023
- PopChange7.1Ranked 54th—· 2100
- PopDensity1,907.3Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2100
- PopGrowthRate0.06Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2100
- PopSexRatio102.3Ranked 41st▼ 1· 2100
- Population5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Population12.81MRanked 96th—· 2100
- Population5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Population5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Population5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Population11.48MRanked 95th—· 2100
- Population5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Population5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Population5.41MRanked 121st—· 2023
- Population ages 00-04, female (% of female population)12.4Ranked 45th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 00-04, male (% of male population)13.1Ranked 41st▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, female997,055Ranked 98th—· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, female (% of female population)36.6Ranked 42nd▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, male1.04MRanked 98th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, male (% of male population)38.6Ranked 35th—· 2025
- Population ages 0-14 (% of total population)37.6Ranked 37th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 0-14, total2.04MRanked 98th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 05-09, female (% of female population)12.4Ranked 34th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 05-09, male (% of male population)13.2Ranked 29th—· 2025
- Population ages 10-14, female (% of female population)11.8Ranked 36th▼ 4· 2025
- Population ages 10-14, male (% of male population)12.3Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2025
- Population ages 15-19, female (% of female population)10.4Ranked 44th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-19, male (% of male population)10.5Ranked 48th▼ 5· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, female1.61MRanked 123rd—· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, female (% of female population)59.2Ranked 174th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, male1.56MRanked 126th—· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, male (% of male population)57.9Ranked 182nd▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-64 (% of total population)58.6Ranked 181st▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 15-64, total3.17MRanked 125th—· 2025
- Population ages 20-24, female (% of female population)8.9Ranked 53rd▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 20-24, male (% of male population)8.8Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 25-29, female (% of female population)8.1Ranked 55th▲ 3· 2025
- Population ages 25-29, male (% of male population)8Ranked 71st▲ 5· 2025
- Population ages 30-34, female (% of female population)7.7Ranked 65th▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 30-34, male (% of male population)7.7Ranked 69th▼ 8· 2025
- Population ages 35-39, female (% of female population)6.5Ranked 129th▼ 17· 2025
- Population ages 35-39, male (% of male population)6.5Ranked 140th▼ 10· 2025
- Population ages 40-44, female (% of female population)5.1Ranked 185th—· 2025
- Population ages 40-44, male (% of male population)5Ranked 184th▼ 3· 2025
- Population ages 45-49, female (% of female population)4.1Ranked 183rd▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 45-49, male (% of male population)3.9Ranked 191st—· 2025
- Population ages 50-54, female (% of female population)3.3Ranked 184th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 50-54, male (% of male population)3.1Ranked 189th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 55-59, female (% of female population)2.8Ranked 180th▼ 1· 2025
- Population ages 55-59, male (% of male population)2.5Ranked 181st▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 60-64, female (% of female population)2.2Ranked 178th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 60-64, male (% of male population)2Ranked 174th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 65-69, female (% of female population)1.7Ranked 174th—· 2025
- Population ages 65-69, male (% of male population)1.5Ranked 174th▲ 3· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, female116,943Ranked 136th▲ 1· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, female (% of female population)4.3Ranked 171st—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, male91,571Ranked 137th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, male (% of male population)3.4Ranked 171st▲ 4· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above (% of total population)3.9Ranked 170th—· 2025
- Population ages 65 and above, total208,514Ranked 135th—· 2025
- Population ages 70-74, female (% of female population)1.2Ranked 174th▲ 3· 2025
- Population ages 70-74, male (% of male population)0.98Ranked 169th▲ 7· 2025
- Population ages 75-79, female (% of female population)0.76Ranked 167th—· 2025
- Population ages 75-79, male (% of male population)0.59Ranked 161st▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 80 and above, female (% of female population)0.69Ranked 166th▲ 2· 2025
- Population ages 80 and above, male (% of male population)0.38Ranked 167th▲ 4· 2025
- Population census recently completed1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Population density1,905.8Ranked 7th—· 2100
- Population, female2.73MRanked 122nd—· 2025
- Population, female (% of total population)50.4Ranked 107th▼ 3· 2025
- Population, female (% of total population)50.4%Ranked 105th▼ 3· 2025
- Population growth rate1.5%Ranked 69th▲ 30· 2023
- Population growth rate1.5%Ranked 69th▲ 30· 2023
- Population growth rate0.06%Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2100
- Population growth rate0.06%Ranked 58th▼ 1· 2100
- Population living in cities with 1 million or more people0Ranked 127th▲ 6· 2020
- Population living in rural areas300,939.5Ranked 154th▼ 1· 2020
- Population (Maddison)5,042Ranked 121st—· 2022
- Population, male2.69MRanked 122nd▼ 2· 2025
- Population, male (% of total population)49.6Ranked 111th▲ 3· 2025
- Population (projections)11.48MRanked 95th—· 2100
- Population, total5.41MRanked 123rd—· 2025
- Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines (% of population)32.8%Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2023
- Price level index (Households and NPISHs Final consumption expenditure)90.7Ranked 15th▼ 9· 2025
- Probability of death at birth1.3%Ranked 129th▲ 13· 2023
- Probability of death at birth1.6%Ranked 125th▲ 11· 2023
- Probability of death at birth1.3%Ranked 129th▲ 13· 2023
- Projected population density of the capital city6,247.5Ranked 74th▼ 3· 2100
- Projected population of the capital city2.21MRanked 77th▼ 1· 2100
- Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone81%Ranked 81st▼ 5· 2023
- Proportion of population aged 18-29 years who experienced sexual violence by age 18, by sex (% of population aged 18-29) - 18 to 29 years old - Female1.8%Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 4G mobile network (%)0%Ranked 88th▼ 26· 2023
- Proportion of population living in multidimensional poverty (%) - All age ranges or no breaks by age - All areas - Both sexes24%Ranked 21st· 2016
- Proportion of urban population living in slums (%)19.5%Ranked 69th▲ 4· 2022
- Q00407.3Ranked 144th—· 2100
- Q0040Female7.5Ranked 126th—· 2100
- Q0040Male7.1Ranked 157th—· 2100
- Q006026.5Ranked 148th—· 2100
- Q0060Female23.7Ranked 133rd—· 2100
- Q0060Male29.2Ranked 159th—· 2100
- Q15509.2Ranked 156th—· 2100
- Q1550Female8.8Ranked 133rd—· 2100
- Q1550Male9.6Ranked 172nd—· 2100
- Q156023.3Ranked 151st—· 2100
- Q1560Female20.2Ranked 135th—· 2100
- Q1560Male26.3Ranked 162nd—· 2100
- Q52.8Ranked 112th—· 2100
- Refugees by country of origin43,701Ranked 33rd▲ 1· 2024
- Replacement fertility rate2.1Ranked 39th▼ 13· 2010
- Rural32.6%Ranked 65th—· 2024
- Rural population683,093Ranked 143rd▼ 1· 2025
- Rural population499,108.3Ranked 144th—· 2050
- Rural population growth (annual %)0.27Ranked 99th▼ 1· 2025
- Rural population (% of total population)12.6Ranked 175th—· 2025
- Rural share0.58%Ranked 70th▼ 3· 2024
- Safely managed73.5%Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2024
- Sex ratio at age 100 and over13.3Ranked 118th▲ 4· 2023
- Sex ratio at age 5104.9Ranked 94th▲ 1· 2023
- Sex ratio at age 6093.1Ranked 109th▲ 6· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth104.8Ranked 110th▲ 7· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth104.8Ranked 110th▲ 7· 2023
- Sex ratio at birth (male births per female births)1.1Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2024
- Share in extreme poverty2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share of births by mothers aged 10-196.9%Ranked 113th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of one person households3.5%Ranked 46th▲ 39· 2007
- Share of population below $1.90 a day (2011 prices)0.83%Ranked 40th▼ 12· 2016
- Share of population below $3.20 a day (2011 prices)4.5%Ranked 35th—· 2016
- Share of population below $5.50 a day (2011 prices)21.9%Ranked 27th▼ 4· 2016
- Share of population in poverty ($10 a day)39.4%Ranked 39th▼ 18· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($1.90 a day)0.83%Ranked 34th▲ 13· 2016
- Share of population in poverty ($1 a day)0.01%Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($2.15 a day)0.5%Ranked 32nd▲ 9· 2016
- Share of population in poverty ($30 a day)97.7%Ranked 61st▲ 7· 2016
- Share of population in poverty ($30 a day)91.9%Ranked 40th▼ 18· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($3 a day)2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($40 a day)96.5%Ranked 40th▼ 22· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($4.20 a day)6.1%Ranked 38th▼ 8· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($8.30 a day)28.6%Ranked 40th▼ 14· 2023
- Share of population in poverty ($8.30 a day)28.6%Ranked 40th▼ 14· 2023
- Share of population in poverty (40% of the median)8.7%Ranked 33rd▼ 10· 2023
- Share of population in poverty (50% of the median)14.7%Ranked 38th▼ 6· 2023
- Share of population in poverty (60% of the median)22.5%Ranked 41st▼ 8· 2023
- Share of population living in cities71%Ranked 15th—· 2020
- Share of population living in cities71%Ranked 15th—· 2020
- Share of population living in extreme poverty2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share of population living in multidimensional poverty1.1%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Share of population living in multidimensional poverty0.55%Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Share of population living in multidimensional poverty1.1%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2019
- Share of population living in multidimensional poverty1.1%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Share of population living in multidimensional poverty0.57%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Share of population living in rural areas5.9%Ranked 201st▲ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in severe multidimensional poverty0.01%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Share of population living in urban areas87.4%Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas94.1%Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas87.4%Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas87.4%Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas87.4%Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas94.1%Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas87.4%Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Share of population living in urban areas94.1%Ranked 15th▼ 1· 2020
- Share of population living in urban areas87.4%Ranked 32nd—· 2025
- Share of population with suffrage0%Ranked 21st▲ 1· 1948
- Share of single-parent households5.6%Ranked 24th▼ 7· 2019
- Share of the population born in another country5%Ranked 110th▲ 9· 2024
- Share of the population living with HIV1.2%Ranked 31st▼ 1· 2024
- Share of the population not using improved sanitation facilities0.28%Ranked 128th▼ 4· 2024
- Share of the population practicing open defecation0.13%Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2024
- Share of the population using at least basic sanitation99.4%Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of the population using improved sanitation facilities99.7%Ranked 29th—· 2024
- Share of the population using safely managed sanitation73.5%Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of the population using the Internet86.6%Ranked 64th▲ 19· 2023
- Share of the population who are Christians1%Ranked 173rd▼ 1· 2020
- Share of the population who are not religious0%Ranked 192nd▲ 1· 2020
- Share of the population who are religious100%Ranked 1st—· 2020
- Share of the population who cannot afford sufficient calories1.4%Ranked 96th· 2021
- Share of the population with basic handwashing facilities94.9%Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of the rural population using at least basic sanitation98.7%Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2024
- Share of the rural population with basic handwashing facilities95.5%Ranked 10th▲ 3· 2024
- Share of the urban population using at least basic sanitation99.6%Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of the urban population using safely managed sanitation85.1%Ranked 28th—· 2024
- Share of total population living in cities with 1 million or more people0%Ranked 126th▲ 6· 2020
- Share of total population living in the capital city19.7%Ranked 69th▲ 5· 2020
- Share of urban population living in the largest city20.9%Ranked 113th▼ 1· 2020
- Sites providing TB diagnostic services using molecular WHO-recommended rapid diagnostics per million population2.5Ranked 78th▲ 8· 2022
- SRB105Ranked 31st▲ 2· 2100
- Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort)82.8Ranked 129th▼ 36· 2024
- Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)63.8Ranked 163rd▼ 43· 2024
- Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)63.8%Ranked 161st▼ 43· 2024
- Technicians in R&D (per million people)178.1Ranked 36th▼ 10· 2013
- TFR1.8Ranked 61st—· 2100
- Total dependency ratio72.9%Ranked 39th—· 2023
- Total dependency ratio72.9%Ranked 39th—· 2023
- Total fertility rate3.3Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2024
- Total number of international immigrants272,481Ranked 106th▲ 4· 2024
- TPopulation1Jan11,478.7Ranked 95th—· 2100
- TPopulation1July11,482.2Ranked 95th—· 2100
- TPopulationFemale1July5,676.9Ranked 94th—· 2100
- TPopulationMale1July5,805.3Ranked 94th▼ 1· 2100
- Under5Deaths0.34Ranked 68th▼ 3· 2100
- Unmet need for contraception (% of married women ages 15-49)12.9Ranked 14th▼ 17· 2020
- Unsentenced detainees as a proportion of overall prison population (%) - Both sexes35.2%Ranked 48th▼ 9· 2022
- Urban94.7%Ranked 17th▲ 2· 2024
- Urban population4.88MRanked 102nd—· 2025
- Urban population4.73MRanked 102nd▼ 1· 2025
- Urban population growth (annual %)2.6Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2025
- Urban population living in slums806,202Ranked 65th▼ 3· 2020
- Urban share99.6%Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Using improved sanitation facilities5.48MRanked 108th▼ 2· 2024
- Women who were first married by age 15 (% of women ages 20-24)0.7Ranked 7th· 2020
- Women who were first married by age 18 (% of women ages 20-24)13.4Ranked 6th· 2020
- Youth dependency ratio66.4%Ranked 37th▼ 2· 2023
- Median age of population19.8Ranked 179th▲ 1· 2023
- Total age dependency ratio72.9Ranked 39th—· 2023
- Net migration rate-4.6Ranked 181st▲ 41· 2023
- Projected population in 2050 (medium)8,451.9Ranked 112th· 2050
- Projected life expectancy in 2050 (medium)81.3Ranked 87th· 2050
Electricity access
- Electricity access100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Renewable energy share15.4%Ranked 34th▼ 75· 2022
- Forest area1.7%Ranked 189th—· 2023
- CO₂ per capita0.87Ranked 154th▲ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions4.78MRanked 138th—· 2024
- Renewable electricity39.4%Ranked 74th▲ 1· 2024
- Agriculture — All GHG0.36Ranked 14th▼ 2· 2023
- Agriculture — CH40.2Ranked 11th—· 2023
- Agriculture (farm gate) GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)427.7Ranked 40th▼ 1· 2023
- Agriculture — N2O0.16Ranked 11th▼ 5· 2023
- Agriculture sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Annual carbon dioxide emissions48,780.3Ranked 47th▲ 30· 2026
- Annual CO₂ emissions4.78MRanked 68th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions4.78MRanked 68th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from cement0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from cement (per capita)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from flaring (per capita)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change37,665.9Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change per capita0.01Ranked 73rd▲ 3· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from oil4.78MRanked 87th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions from oil (per capita)0.87Ranked 72nd▲ 1· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions growth (abs)24,688Ranked 88th▼ 44· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change4.82MRanked 40th—· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change per capita0.88Ranked 27th▲ 1· 2024
- Annual CO₂ emissions per GDP (kg per international-$)0.2Ranked 86th▲ 38· 2022
- Annual PM2.5 emissions from wildfires146.4Ranked 40th▲ 27· 2026
- Annual precipitation256.6Ranked 160th▼ 3· 2025
- Annual precipitation anomaly-74.5Ranked 120th▼ 25· 2025
- Aquaculture production (metric tons)32Ranked 165th▲ 27· 2024
- Average price on emissions covered by a carbon tax, weighted by the share of the country's CO₂ emissions0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Average price on emissions covered by an ETS, weighted by the share of the country's CO₂ emissions0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Average surface temperature21.2Ranked 107th▼ 3· 2025
- Building — All GHG0.58Ranked 31st—· 2023
- Building — CH40.04Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Building — CO20.54Ranked 38th—· 2023
- Building — N2O0Ranked 1st▼ 1· 2023
- Buildings sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Bunker Fuels — All GHG0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — CO20Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Bunker Fuels — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons)250Ranked 194th▲ 34· 2024
- Carbon monoxide emissions from all sectors0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Carbon price (US$ per tonne of CO₂ in 2025) on covered emissions (which can be economy-wide or sector-specific)0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions0Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Change in global mean surface temperature caused by greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and land use0Ranked 17th—· 2024
- Change in heat-related death rate6.8Ranked 133rd▲ 11· 2090
- Child mortality rate3.8%Ranked 151st▼ 7· 2024
- CO₂ emissions4.78MRanked 68th—· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita0.87Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita0.87Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita0.87Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita0.87Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita0.87Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita0.87Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita0.87Ranked 52nd▼ 1· 2024
- CO₂ emissions per capita Consumption based, tonnes per capita0.73Ranked 42nd▲ 2· 2022
- CO₂ emissions per unit energy176.8Ranked 56th—· 2024
- Consumption CO₂ emissions, million tonnes3.8Ranked 51st▼ 1· 2022
- Consumption emissions per capita from Global Carbon Project0.97Ranked 36th—· 2022
- Covered by a carbon tax or an emissions trading system0%Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions77.99MRanked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions77.99MRanked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change1.42MRanked 22nd—· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil77.99MRanked 59th▲ 1· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change76.71MRanked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Cumulative CO₂ emissions, total77.62MRanked 45th▲ 1· 2022
- Death rate774.2Ranked 18th▲ 1· 2090
- Decadal average surface temperature20.8Ranked 108th▼ 1· 2010
- Decadal temperature anomaly0.53Ranked 14th▼ 100· 2010
- December1.1Ranked 72nd▼ 26· 2025
- Electricity/Heat — All GHG0.39Ranked 24th▼ 3· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — CO20.39Ranked 25th▼ 2· 2023
- Electricity/Heat — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Energy — All GHG4.4Ranked 46th▼ 5· 2023
- Energy — CH40.05Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Energy — CO24.3Ranked 53rd▼ 3· 2023
- Energy — N2O0.06Ranked 6th—· 2023
- Firms adopting energy management measures to reduce emissions (% of firms)13Ranked 7th· 2023
- Firms monitoring own CO2 emissions (% of firms)6Ranked 13th· 2023
- Fluorinated Gases sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Forestry And Land Use sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Fossil Fuel Operations sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Fossil fuels and industry4.78MRanked 138th—· 2024
- Fugitive Emissions — All GHG0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Fugitive Emissions — CO20Ranked 1st—· 2000
- Fugitive Emissions — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- GDP4.3%Ranked 63rd▼ 135· 2025
- GDP per capita4,775.2Ranked 124th▲ 1· 2022
- GDP per capita3,845.5Ranked 158th▲ 1· 2024
- Gross domestic product (GDP)20.34BRanked 147th▲ 2· 2024
- Heat-related death rate6.8Ranked 133rd▲ 11· 2090
- Industrial Processes — All GHG0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Industrial Processes — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Industrial Processes — CO20Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Industrial Processes — F-Gas0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Industrial Processes — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- January1.3Ranked 27th▼ 14· 2026
- June-0.15Ranked 174th▲ 67· 2026
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — All GHG0Ranked 56th▼ 1· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — CO20Ranked 55th—· 2023
- Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — All GHG0.06Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — CO20.06Ranked 6th▼ 2· 2023
- Manufacturing/Construction — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Manufacturing sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- March-1Ranked 178th▲ 137· 2026
- Mineral Extraction sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Nitrogen oxides emissions from all sectors0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Oil0.87Ranked 134th▼ 1· 2024
- Oil4.78MRanked 119th—· 2024
- Other Fuel Combustion — All GHG0.03Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — CO20.03Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Other Fuel Combustion — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Population2.3%Ranked 33rd▼ 2· 2025
- Power sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- See climate change as a serious threat (% of population)28.9Ranked 103rd· 2019
- See climate change as a somewhat serious threat (% of population)44.8Ranked 7th· 2019
- See climate change as a threat (% of population)73.7Ranked 74th· 2019
- Self-reported life satisfaction4.7Ranked 106th▲ 1· 2025
- September0.27Ranked 145th▲ 14· 2025
- Share of contribution to global warming0%Ranked 204th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions0.01%Ranked 68th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from cement0%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from flaring0%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change0%Ranked 74th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions from oil0.04%Ranked 87th—· 2024
- Share of global annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change0.01%Ranked 40th—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions0%Ranked 55th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from cement0%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from flaring0%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change0%Ranked 22nd—· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from oil0.01%Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change0%Ranked 25th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of global emissions0.01%Ranked 68th—· 2024
- Share of population0.11%Ranked 95th—· 2100
- Stunting prevalence among children under 5 years of age (% height-for-age <-2 SD), survey-based estimates - Sex: both sexes8.7%Ranked 18th▼ 17· 2020
- Sulfur dioxide emissions from all sectors0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Sulfur dioxide emissions from all sectors0Ranked 1st—· 2022
- Temperature anomaly0.95Ranked 51st▼ 36· 2025
- Temperature anomaly0.95Ranked 51st▼ 36· 2025
- Terrestrial and marine protected areas (% of total territorial area)10Ranked 101st▲ 7· 2025
- Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)10Ranked 120th▲ 2· 2025
- Territorial CO₂ emissions, million tonnes3.08MRanked 51st▲ 1· 2021
- Territorial CO₂ emissions, million tonnes per capita0.6Ranked 41st—· 2021
- Territorial emissions4.78MRanked 68th—· 2024
- Territorial fossil CO2 emissions1.3Ranked 59th—· 2024
- Time to obtain an electrical connection (days)21.6Ranked 27th▲ 23· 2023
- Total CH4 emissions27,105.1Ranked 54th—· 2024
- Total CH4 emissions7.3Ranked 33rd—· 2023
- Total CO2 emissions3Ranked 9th—· 2023
- Total CO2 emissions4.99MRanked 62nd▲ 1· 2024
- Total excluding LULUCF — All GHG4.7Ranked 39th▼ 1· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — CH40.26Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — CO24.3Ranked 52nd▼ 4· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — F-Gas0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Total excluding LULUCF — N2O0.22Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2023
- Total fisheries production (metric tons)282Ranked 199th▲ 27· 2024
- Total (fossil fuels and land-use change)4.82MRanked 153rd—· 2024
- Total GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Total GHG emissions (CO2eq, AR5)367.9Ranked 30th▼ 3· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — All GHG4.8Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — CH40.26Ranked 13th▲ 1· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — CO24.3Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — F-Gas0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Total including LULUCF — N2O0.22Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2023
- Total N2O emissions1,330.8Ranked 65th—· 2024
- Total N2O emissions0.61Ranked 42nd▼ 1· 2023
- Transportation — All GHG3.3Ranked 68th▼ 3· 2023
- Transportation — CH40.01Ranked 2nd▼ 1· 2023
- Transportation — CO23.3Ranked 63rd▼ 6· 2023
- Transportation — N2O0.05Ranked 6th▼ 1· 2023
- Transportation sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Value lost due to electrical outages (% of sales for affected firms)0Ranked 7th▲ 5· 2023
- Waste — All GHG0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Waste — CH40Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Waste — N2O0Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Waste sector GHG emissions (CO2e, 100yr)6.09MRanked 58th▲ 2· 2024
- Year-on-year change in CO₂ emissions (%)0.52%Ranked 63rd▼ 63· 2024
- Electricity from coal0%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Electricity from solar39.4%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Electricity from wind0%Ranked 104th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity from hydro0%Ranked 144th▼ 3· 2024
- Power-sector CO2 intensity414.1Ranked 84th▼ 2· 2024
- Total GHG emissions incl. LULUCF4.8Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2023
- GHG emissions per capita0.92Ranked 13th▼ 1· 2023
Risk
Deaths in armed conflicts
- Deaths in armed conflicts15,182Ranked 49th—· 2025
- INFORM risk score6.4Ranked 51st· 2026
- Hazard & exposure7.2Ranked 61st· 2026
- Vulnerability6.5Ranked 53rd· 2026
- Lack of coping capacity5.6Ranked 47th· 2026
- Natural hazard & exposure1.6Ranked 5th· 2026
- Human hazard & exposure9.5Ranked 72nd· 2026
- Socio-economic vulnerability4.4Ranked 44th· 2026
- Access to electricity0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Access to electricity100Ranked 73rd· 2026
- AFF_DR_REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Armed forces personnel (% of total labor force)0%Ranked 166th▲ 1· 2020
- Armed forces personnel, total0Ranked 109th▲ 5· 2020
- A terrorist attack: Worried51.6%Ranked 41st· 2014
- A terrorist attack: Worried51.6%Ranked 41st· 2014
- Average dietary supply adequacy4Ranked 30th· 2026
- Average dietary supply adequacy120Ranked 27th· 2026
- Best estimate0Ranked 23rd▼ 5· 2025
- Best estimate0Ranked 14th▲ 4· 2025
- Best estimate14,419Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Best estimate86Ranked 17th▼ 8· 2025
- bioweapons_status_current_num0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM1.9Ranked 19th· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.DTP31.9Ranked 12th· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.MCV21.7Ranked 11th· 2026
- CC.INF.AHC.IMM.PCV32Ranked 13th· 2026
- CC.INF.PHY.STA0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- chemweapons_status_current_num0Ranked 5th· 2022
- Child Mortality26.3Ranked 92nd· 2026
- Child Mortality2Ranked 19th· 2026
- Children Under Weight0.5Ranked 5th· 2026
- Children Under Weight2.1Ranked 17th· 2026
- Civilian deaths3,397Ranked 40th▼ 4· 2025
- Civilian deaths3,397Ranked 40th▼ 4· 2025
- Coastal Flood0.19Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Coastal floods (absolute)0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Communication2Ranked 18th· 2026
- Conflict GPI3.3Ranked 120th· 2026
- Conflict GPI9.4Ranked 62nd· 2026
- Country where conflict took place - Conflict type: all1Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Cumulative death rate in armed conflicts2,669.7Ranked 125th· 2024
- Cumulative deaths in armed conflicts54,877Ranked 103rd· 2024
- Current health expenditure per capita604.4Ranked 69th· 2026
- Cyclones0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Death rate in ongoing conflicts (best estimate) - Conflict type: all259.5Ranked 55th▼ 1· 2025
- Deaths in armed conflicts365Ranked 22nd▼ 29· 2026
- Deaths in armed conflicts based on where they occurred365Ranked 22nd▼ 29· 2026
- Demographic pressures (S1)8.3Ranked 61st▲ 1· 2023
- Development & Deprivation3Ranked 28th· 2026
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)151.79MRanked 31st▼ 46· 2018
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)151.79MRanked 31st▼ 46· 2018
- Drought affected0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Drought affected0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Drought Frequency0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Drought Frequency0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Droughts0Ranked 1st· 2026
- DRR8.2Ranked 57th· 2026
- earthquake (absolute)5.2Ranked 37th· 2026
- earthquake (relative)4.3Ranked 26th· 2026
- Earthquakes4.8Ranked 28th· 2026
- Economic inequality (E2)4.9Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2023
- Economy (E1)6.2Ranked 40th▼ 5· 2023
- EX_CFL_REL0Ranked 2nd· 2026
- EX_EQ_MMI6_REL0.14Ranked 60th· 2026
- EX_EQ_MMI8_REL0Ranked 15th· 2026
- EX_FL_REL0Ranked 2nd· 2026
- EX_TC_SS1_REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- EX_TC_SS3_REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- External intervention (X1)10Ranked 77th▼ 2· 2023
- EX_TS_REL46.6Ranked 11th· 2026
- Factionalized elites (C2)8.6Ranked 67th▼ 2· 2023
- FSI total score87.9Ranked 133rd▲ 4· 2023
- FTS-1.REL784.2Ranked 162nd· 2026
- FTS-2.REL683.8Ranked 173rd· 2026
- FTS-3.REL353Ranked 169th· 2026
- FTS Instability50.5Ranked 160th· 2026
- FTS Instability10Ranked 75th· 2026
- GDP per capita (current US$)2,592.3Ranked 49th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 5.62MRanked 75th· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 5.37MRanked 73rd· 2026
- GHSL Population Grid 5.49MRanked 73rd· 2026
- Governance7.4Ranked 58th· 2026
- Government Effectiveness-1.2Ranked 23rd· 2026
- Government Effectiveness7.4Ranked 56th· 2026
- Group grievance (C3)5.8Ranked 42nd▲ 7· 2023
- HA.FWB3.4Ranked 26th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP6.5Ranked 45th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.HOUS7.7Ranked 46th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.POP.DNST9.8Ranked 63rd· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.URB.GROW5.3Ranked 48th· 2026
- HA.FWB.POP.URB.TOTL8.7Ranked 66th· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH.STA.BASS0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH.STA.HNDWSH0.5Ranked 6th· 2026
- HA.FWB.WASH.STA.ODFC0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.HUM.CON.GCRI9.6Ranked 53rd· 2026
- HA.NAT.CFL-ABS0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.CFL-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR.AFF0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR.AFF-FREQ0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.DR-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI6-ABS6.2Ranked 33rd· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI6-REL6.8Ranked 36th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI8-ABS3.9Ranked 7th· 2026
- HA.NAT.EQ.MMI8-REL0.2Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.NAT.FL-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS1-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS3-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS-ABS0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT.TC.SS-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.NAT-TEMP1.6Ranked 5th· 2026
- HA.NAT.TS-REL1.2Ranked 8th· 2026
- HA.P2P5.4Ranked 33rd· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP7.9Ranked 47th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.HOUS7.7Ranked 46th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.POP.DNST9.8Ranked 63rd· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.URB.GROW5.3Ranked 48th· 2026
- HA.P2P.POP.URB.TOTL8.7Ranked 66th· 2026
- HA.P2P.WASH0.3Ranked 4th· 2026
- HA.P2P.WASH.STA.BASS0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- HA.P2P.WASH.STA.HNDWSH0.5Ranked 6th· 2026
- HA.VECT.AEDES9Ranked 54th· 2026
- HA.VECT.AEDES-REL9.6Ranked 70th· 2026
- HA.VECT.DENG5.5Ranked 28th· 2026
- HA.VECT.DENG-REL2.5Ranked 17th· 2026
- HA.VECT.MAL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.MAL-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV3.3Ranked 7th· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV-ABS5.5Ranked 12th· 2026
- HA.VECT.ZIKV-REL0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Hazard3.8Ranked 20th· 2026
- HA.ZOON0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.ZOON.CCHF0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HA.ZOON.CCHF-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- HDI-Est0.63Ranked 49th· 2026
- Health Care3.7Ranked 35th· 2026
- Health expenditure per capita8.1Ranked 49th· 2026
- Highly Violent Internal Conflict probability0.91Ranked 144th· 2026
- Household size5.1Ranked 67th· 2026
- Household size5.1Ranked 67th· 2026
- Human5.4Ranked 34th· 2026
- Human Development Index0.67Ranked 57th· 2026
- Human Development Index4.5Ranked 76th· 2026
- Human flight and brain drain (E3)8.9Ranked 72nd▼ 1· 2023
- Human rights (P3)7.6Ranked 64th▼ 2· 2023
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Improved water source (% of population with access)0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Incidence of Tuberculosis 0.29Ranked 1st· 2026
- Income Gini coefficient - Inequality in income or consumption2.9Ranked 29th· 2026
- Income Gini coefficient - Inequality in income or consumption36.4Ranked 61st· 2026
- Inequality2.9Ranked 26th· 2026
- Internally Displaced People2.03MRanked 47th· 2026
- Internally displaced people due to conflict0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases)250Ranked 28th▲ 13· 2022
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service1.9BRanked 164th· 2026
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service3.76BRanked 172nd· 2026
- International humanitarian aid by the Financial Tracking Service4.41BRanked 162nd· 2026
- Internationalized intrastate0Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2025
- Internet users (per 100 people)86.6Ranked 120th· 2026
- Internet users (per 100 people)1.3Ranked 14th· 2026
- Interstate conflicts1Ranked 2nd· 2024
- Intrastate54,274Ranked 7th· 2024
- IS.ROD.DNST.K2282.4Ranked 178th· 2026
- Land area (sq. km)6,020Ranked 27th· 2026
- Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above)97.9Ranked 107th· 2026
- Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above)0.4Ranked 5th· 2026
- Maternal Mortality0.2Ranked 3rd· 2026
- Maternal Mortality16Ranked 16th· 2026
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)76.7Ranked 42nd· 2026
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)6.3Ranked 50th· 2026
- MPI_1000.2Ranked 10th· 2026
- Multidimensional Poverty Index0Ranked 10th· 2026
- Natural Disasters235Ranked 60th· 2026
- Natural Disasters0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Natural Disasters0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Net ODA received (% of GNI)16.8Ranked 121st· 2026
- Net ODA received (% of GNI)8.2Ranked 52nd· 2026
- Nuclear weapons status0Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Number of reported natural disasters with a small impact0Ranked 6th▲ 1· 2025
- Number of reported natural disasters with a small impact0Ranked 17th▲ 5· 2020
- ODA-1.REL768.5Ranked 129th· 2026
- ODA-2.REL674.7Ranked 127th· 2026
- ODA % GN1.4Ranked 102nd· 2026
- ODA % GN6.6Ranked 52nd· 2026
- ODA Instability40.6Ranked 112th· 2026
- ODA Instability7Ranked 51st· 2026
- Official Development Assistance3,623.9Ranked 129th· 2026
- Official Development Assistance4,222.9Ranked 131st· 2026
- One-sided violence1Ranked 7th—· 2025
- One-sided violence1.5Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2025
- One-sided violence86Ranked 17th▼ 8· 2025
- One-sided violence1.5Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2025
- One-sided violence86Ranked 17th▼ 8· 2025
- Others Vulnerable Groups2.4Ranked 23rd· 2026
- People practicing open defecation (% of population)0.13Ranked 21st· 2026
- People using at least basic drinking water services (% of population)98.8Ranked 125th· 2026
- People using at least basic sanitation services (% of population)99.4Ranked 163rd· 2026
- Personal remittances, received (% of GDP)5.4Ranked 125th· 2026
- Physical exposure to CCHF0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to CCHF0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VI7,607.6Ranked 59th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VI6.2Ranked 33rd· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VIII3.9Ranked 7th· 2026
- Physical exposure to earthquakes of MMI categories higher than VIII247.6Ranked 12th· 2026
- Physical exposure to flood23.9Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Physical exposure to river flood0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 10Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 10Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 30Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tropical cyclone of Saffir-Simpson category 30Ranked 1st· 2026
- Physical exposure to tsunamis0.26Ranked 8th· 2026
- Physical exposure to tsunamis0.7Ranked 4th· 2026
- Physical Infrastructure0.1Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Physicians density21.7Ranked 102nd· 2026
- Physicians density4.6Ranked 35th· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.AEDES-REL95.5Ranked 134th· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.DENGUE-REL25.1Ranked 43rd· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.MAL.ZS0Ranked 1st· 2026
- POP.EXP.VECT.ZIKA-REL1.2Ranked 8th· 2026
- POP.EXP.ZOON.CCHF-REL0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Population ages 0-5 (% of total)5.2Ranked 43rd· 2026
- Population ages 0-5 (% of total)12.7Ranked 149th· 2026
- Population at Risk to Aedes8.2Ranked 40th· 2026
- Population at Risk to Aedes5.37MRanked 73rd· 2026
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)857.4Ranked 186th· 2026
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)857.4Ranked 186th· 2026
- Population exposed to Dengue1.41MRanked 67th· 2026
- Population exposed to Dengue7.4Ranked 31st· 2026
- Population exposed to Zika65,868.6Ranked 16th· 2026
- Population living in urban areas (%)87.1Ranked 166th· 2026
- Population living in urban areas (%)87.1Ranked 166th· 2026
- Population living in urban slums19.5Ranked 79th· 2026
- Population living in urban slums2.2Ranked 20th· 2026
- Populations at risk of malaria0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Populations at risk of malaria0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)12.4Ranked 45th· 2026
- Prevalence of undernourishment (% of population)2.5Ranked 21st· 2026
- Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)100%Ranked 41st▲ 6· 2018
- Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)100%Ranked 41st▲ 6· 2018
- Proportion of population with basic handwashing facilities on premises (% of population)94.9Ranked 94th· 2026
- Proportion of population with basic handwashing facilities on premises (% of population)94.9Ranked 94th· 2026
- Proportion of the target population with access to 3 doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP3)88Ranked 34th· 2026
- Proportion of the target population with access to measles-containing-vaccine second-dose (MCV2)89Ranked 54th· 2026
- Proportion of the target population with access to pneumococcal conjugate 3rd dose (PCV3)87Ranked 37th· 2026
- Public services (P2)4.4Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2023
- Refugee change from previous year, by country of asylum51,965Ranked 24th▲ 9· 2022
- Refugee change from previous year, by country of origin27,816Ranked 9th▼ 8· 2022
- Refugees and asylum-seekers by country of asylum0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Refugees and IDPs (S2)6.2Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2023
- Refugees by country of origin per 100,000 people795.2Ranked 21st—· 2024
- Refugees (Palestine)2.47MRanked 4th· 2026
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNHCR by country or territory of origin48,323Ranked 33rd—· 2025
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNRWA by country or territory of asylum2.48MRanked 1st—· 2025
- Refugees under the mandate of the UNRWA by country or territory of origin5.96MRanked 1st—· 2025
- Remittences Instability2.6Ranked 172nd· 2026
- Remittences Instability9.7Ranked 80th· 2026
- Returned refugees36Ranked 17th· 2026
- River floods0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Road density (km of road per 100 sq. km of land area)0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Roads, total network (km)17,000Ranked 47th· 2026
- Score of adoption and implementation of national DRR strategies in line with the Sendai Framework0.4Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2018
- Score of adoption and implementation of national DRR strategies in line with the Sendai Framework0.4Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2018
- Security apparatus (C1)7.9Ranked 61st▲ 15· 2023
- SFM Indicator E-1 Frequency of Reporting = count6.7Ranked 6th· 2026
- SFM Indicator E-1 Frequency of Reporting = count0.4Ranked 4th· 2026
- SFM Indicator E-1 Score = non zero average8.8Ranked 65th· 2026
- SFM Indicator E-1 Score = non zero average0.25Ranked 2nd· 2026
- State legitimacy (P1)9.1Ranked 67th▲ 3· 2023
- Tsunamis1Ranked 4th· 2026
- Tuberculosis prevalence0Ranked 1st· 2026
- Uprooted people10Ranked 74th· 2026
- Urban population growth (annual %)2.7Ranked 138th· 2026
- Urban population growth (annual %)2.7Ranked 138th· 2026
- Vulnerable groups8Ranked 69th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD8.5Ranked 65th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Development7.7Ranked 59th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP1,821Ranked 178th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP.GEO10Ranked 77th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.FTS-POP.NORM10Ranked 69th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Humanitarian10Ranked 73rd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-GNI7.5Ranked 52nd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-GNI.GEO7.5Ranked 62nd· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP1,443.2Ranked 127th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP.GEO7.9Ranked 58th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-POP.NORM8.6Ranked 51st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.ODA-TOT7.9Ranked 51st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.REM2.7Ranked 26th· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.REM.GEO7.7Ranked 61st· 2026
- VU.SEV.AD.Remittences7.7Ranked 46th· 2026
- VU.SEV.PD.HDI4.5Ranked 43rd· 2026
- VU.SEV.PD.HDI-EST4.9Ranked 46th· 2026
- VU.SEV.PD.MPI1.1Ranked 6th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.FS3.3Ranked 33rd· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.HE0Ranked 1st· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-POP4.2Ranked 20th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-REL4.2Ranked 20th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.NATDIS-TOT235,020Ranked 94th· 2026
- VU.VGR.OG.U51.3Ranked 12th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-ABS10Ranked 61st· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-POP80.2Ranked 174th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-REL10Ranked 69th· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.POC-TOT4.51MRanked 163rd· 2026
- VU.VGR.UP.REF-TOT2.47MRanked 160th· 2026
- Lack of institutional coping capacity7.8Ranked 56th· 2026
- Lack of infrastructure coping capacity1.9Ranked 16th· 2026
Society
World Bank (WDI)CC BY 4.0updated 2050Our World in DataCC BY 4.0updated 2050UNDP (HDRO)CC BY 3.0 IGOupdated 2050
Gini index
- Gini index36.4Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2023
- Extreme poverty2.1%Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2023
- Internet users86.6%Ranked 65th▲ 16· 2023
- Homicide rate0.62Ranked 15th▼ 6· 2022
- Female labor participation18.9%Ranked 174th▼ 4· 2022
- Fixed broadband subscriptions8.2Ranked 101st▼ 4· 2024
- Life satisfaction4.7Ranked 106th▲ 1· 2025
- Human Development Index0.67Ranked 103rd▲ 15· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.95Ranked 67th▼ 24· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted HDI0.54Ranked 87th▲ 15· 2023
- Planetary pressures-adjusted HDI0.65Ranked 71st▲ 29· 2023
- 5.5.2 - Proportion of women in senior and middle management positions - 13th ICLS (%) - IC_GEN_MGTN21.1%Ranked 79th▲ 5· 2022
- Accepting a bribe: Never justifiable71.2%Ranked 32nd· 2014
- Adequacy of social insurance programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)20.8%Ranked 31st· 2016
- Adequacy of social safety net programs (% of total welfare of beneficiary households)4.1%Ranked 27th▲ 25· 2016
- Adolescent birth rate36Ranked 89th▲ 1· 2023
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, bottom 40% of population (%)-0.59Ranked 31st· 2023
- Annualized average growth rate in per capita real survey mean consumption or income, total population (%)0.56Ranked 25th· 2023
- Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter)20.4Ranked 79th▲ 3· 2023
- Asylum-seekers by country of origin16,726Ranked 55th▼ 4· 2025
- Asylum-seekers by country of origin15,720Ranked 59th▼ 1· 2024
- Asylum-seekers by country of residence0Ranked 151st▲ 1· 2024
- Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin16,726Ranked 55th▼ 4· 2025
- Average proportion of deprivations for people multidimensionally poor (%)42.4Ranked 11th· 2016
- Average remittance costs of sending $200 to a receiving country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%)3.6Ranked 82nd▼ 3· 2025
- Average share of weighted deprivations of total households (intensity) (%)41.7Ranked 3rd· 2016
- Average transaction cost of sending remittances to a specific country (%)2Ranked 76th▲ 9· 2023
- A woman can choose where to live in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- A woman can open a bank account in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- A woman can sign a contract in the same way as a man (1=yes; 0=no)1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Basic welfare Index (IDEA)60.9Ranked 86th▼ 1· 2021
- Below $3 a day2.1%Ranked 19th▼ 22· 2023
- Cereal yield (kg per hectare)2,464.7Ranked 103rd▲ 3· 2023
- Children (13-15) who reported being bullied56%Ranked 13th· 2015
- co2_prod0.65Ranked 151st▲ 2· 2023
- coef_ineq19.7Ranked 76th▼ 13· 2023
- Countries that have national urban policies or regional development plans that respond to population dynamics; ensure balanced territorial development; and increase local fiscal space (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Countries with systems to track and make public allocations for gender equality and women's empowerment (0 = does not meet the requirement; 1 = approached the requirement; 2 = Fully meets requirement)1Ranked 2nd· 2021
- Daily male smokers485,714Ranked 107th—· 2012
- Daily time spent on domestic work, women (UN (2017))5.5Ranked 8th▲ 1· 2012
- Degree to which the legal framework (including customary law) guarantees women’s equal rights to land ownership and/or control (1=No evidence to 6=Highest levels of guarantees)1Ranked 6th· 2021
- diff_hdi_phdi3.1Ranked 115th—· 2023
- Direct agriculture loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)99.3Ranked 16th▼ 28· 2018
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)776.6Ranked 14th▼ 65· 2018
- Direct economic loss attributed to disasters relative to GDP (%)0.05Ranked 8th▼ 67· 2018
- Direct economic loss in the housing sector attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)78,750Ranked 70th▲ 28· 2018
- Direct economic loss resulting from damaged or destroyed critical infrastructure attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)677.22MRanked 7th▼ 34· 2018
- Direct economic loss to cultural heritage damaged or destroyed attributed to disasters (millions of current United States dollars)0Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2013
- Direct economic loss to other damaged or destroyed productive assets attributed to disasters (current United States dollars)0Ranked 21st▲ 12· 2015
- Equal access to financial services for women and men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Equality of civil liberties across social groups-0.02Ranked 57th▲ 1· 1948
- Equality of political power across social groups-1.6Ranked 110th▲ 1· 1948
- Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education (%)68Ranked 31st· 2022
- eys_f13.8Ranked 99th▲ 2· 2023
- eys_m12.2Ranked 128th▲ 4· 2023
- Females0.17Ranked 31st▼ 103· 2023
- Female share of low pay earners26%Ranked 41st▼ 14· 2024
- Forcibly displaced people3.1MRanked 160th▲ 2· 2025
- gdi_group3Ranked 3rd· 2023
- GDI Group3Ranked 3rd· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.95Ranked 67th▼ 24· 2023
- Gender Development Index0.95Ranked 67th▼ 24· 2023
- Gender wage gap13.2%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Gender wage gap13.2%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Gender wage gap - Occupation (Skill level): Total13.2%Ranked 11th—· 2024
- Gini according to the World Inequality Database0.6Ranked 6th▼ 56· 2023
- Gini coefficient0.36Ranked 37th—· 2023
- Gini coefficient of lifespan inequality - Sex: female0.17Ranked 186th▲ 103· 2023
- Gini coefficient of lifespan inequality - Sex: male0.23Ranked 206th▲ 145· 2023
- gni_pc_f2,339.3Ranked 162nd▲ 1· 2023
- gni_pc_m10,805.9Ranked 122nd▲ 5· 2023
- Growth rates of household expenditure or income per capita (%)0.56Ranked 25th· 2023
- Happiness: Happy74.4%Ranked 51st· 2014
- Harmonized national poverty line8.9Ranked 2nd· 2023
- Harmonized national poverty line8.9Ranked 2nd· 2023
- HCI in males0.55Ranked 79th▲ 3· 2020
- hdi_f0.64Ranked 128th▲ 7· 2023
- hdi_m0.68Ranked 130th▲ 31· 2023
- hdi_rank133Ranked 57th· 2023
- Homicides33Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2022
- Homicides of female victims7Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Homicides of female victims7Ranked 8th▼ 2· 2022
- Homicides of male victims67Ranked 33rd▲ 8· 2022
- Homicides where the weapon was a firearm19Ranked 15th▲ 9· 2021
- Homosexuality: Not justifiable89.6%Ranked 15th· 2014
- Hours per day spent on unpaid domestic labor, by sex, age and location (hrs per day) - 15 years old and over - All areas - Female4.8Ranked 1st—· 2013
- Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0-1)0.58Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2020
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, female (scale -30–87)-11.5Ranked 167th▼ 3· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, male (scale -30–87)27.1Ranked 160th▲ 29· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): on-the-job learning pillar score, total (scale -30–87)8.9Ranked 170th▲ 4· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, female (scale 0–325)153Ranked 99th▼ 3· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, male (scale 0–325)161.2Ranked 112th▲ 26· 2025
- Human capital index plus (HCI+): overall score, total (scale 0–325)157.9Ranked 108th▲ 10· 2025
- Human Development Index0.67Ranked 103rd▲ 15· 2023
- Human Development Index0.67Ranked 103rd▲ 15· 2023
- Human Development Index0.67Ranked 103rd▲ 15· 2023
- Human Development Index0.67Ranked 103rd▲ 15· 2023
- Human Development Index (male)0.68Ranked 130th▲ 31· 2023
- [ILO] Proportion of poor population receiving social assistance cash benefit, by sex (%)42.4Ranked 12th· 2022
- [ILO] Proportion of population covered by at least one social protection benefit, by sex (%)16.5Ranked 65th▼ 28· 2022
- [ILO] Proportion of population with severe disabilities receiving disability cash benefit, by sex (%)34.5Ranked 16th▼ 20· 2022
- [ILO] Proportion of vulnerable population receiving social assistance cash benefit, by sex (%)12.9Ranked 23rd▼ 14· 2022
- Income share held by fourth 20%23Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Income share held by highest 10%27.1Ranked 23rd▼ 18· 2023
- Income share held by highest 20%43Ranked 21st▼ 22· 2023
- Income share held by lowest 10%2.5Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Income share held by lowest 20%6.6Ranked 19th▼ 1· 2023
- Income share held by second 20%11.3Ranked 25th▲ 5· 2023
- Income share held by third 20%16.1Ranked 21st▲ 4· 2023
- ineq_edu9.5Ranked 108th▼ 2· 2023
- ineq_inc31.4Ranked 62nd—· 2023
- ineq_le18.2Ranked 56th▼ 52· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted HDI0.54Ranked 59th▼ 13· 2023
- Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index0.54Ranked 59th▼ 13· 2023
- Intensity of multidimensional poverty34.7%Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2019
- Intensity of multidimensional poverty35%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Intensity of multidimensional poverty35%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Intentional homicides, female (per 100,000 female)0.26Ranked 4th▼ 7· 2022
- Intentional homicides, male (per 100,000 male)2.5Ranked 44th▲ 13· 2022
- Internally displaced people (IDP) by country or territory of asylum / origin2.04MRanked 40th▼ 6· 2025
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with conflict and violence (number of cases)3.44MRanked 41st▲ 31· 2023
- Internally displaced persons, new displacement associated with disasters (number of cases)250Ranked 28th▲ 13· 2022
- Justice system (courts)44.4%Ranked 41st· 2014
- Latest data (2021 prices)107,103Ranked 26th▼ 24· 2023
- Latest data (2021 prices)2.1%Ranked 19th▼ 22· 2023
- Laws on child marriage0.75Ranked 2nd· 2019
- le_f71.5Ranked 135th▲ 64· 2023
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 1: overarching legal frameworks and public life63.6%Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 1: overarching legal frameworks and public life63.6Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 2: violence against women55.6Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 2: violence against women55.6%Ranked 5th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 3: employment and economic benefits30Ranked 8th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 4: marriage and family54.5Ranked 7th—· 2024
- Legal frameworks that promote, enforce and monitor gender equality (percentage of achievement, 0 - 100) -- Area 4: marriage and family54.6%Ranked 7th—· 2024
- le_m59.7Ranked 185th▲ 128· 2023
- lfpr_f18.6Ranked 177th▲ 3· 2023
- lfpr_m70.7Ranked 85th▼ 3· 2023
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 166th▲ 105· 2023
- Liquid assets to short term liabilities (%)43.1Ranked 77th▲ 6· 2023
- loss20.2Ranked 77th▼ 10· 2023
- Married women are not required by law to obey their husbands0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Maternal mortality ratio20.4Ranked 61st—· 2023
- Mean daily welfare12.5Ranked 140th▼ 1· 2026
- Median daily welfare10Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2026
- mf4.9Ranked 111th▼ 1· 2023
- Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (UNDP & OPHI) (% of population)0.6Ranked 4th· 2019
- Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population)2Ranked 16th▲ 2· 2023
- Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)0Ranked 4th· 2019
- Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)0Ranked 2nd—· 2019
- Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI)0Ranked 4th· 2019
- mys_f10.2Ranked 89th▼ 1· 2023
- mys_m10Ranked 93rd—· 2023
- Neighborhood71.5%Ranked 37th· 2014
- Neighbors being homosexuals: Mentioned65.3%Ranked 21st· 2014
- Neighbors of a different religion: Mentioned50.3%Ranked 4th· 2014
- Net personal wealth share, bottom 50%0.04Ranked 93rd▲ 5· 2024
- Net personal wealth share, top 1%0.3Ranked 54th▼ 1· 2024
- Net personal wealth share, top 10%0.64Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Non-performing loans net of provisions to capital (%)9.8Ranked 47th▼ 6· 2023
- Non-performing loans to total gross loans (%)3.4Ranked 70th▼ 3· 2023
- Not in extreme poverty5.06MRanked 16th▼ 8· 2023
- Number of damaged critical infrastructure attributed to disasters (number)41Ranked 21st▼ 15· 2018
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters (number)54Ranked 19th—· 2024
- Number of deaths and missing persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)0.98Ranked 41st▲ 6· 2024
- Number of deaths due to disaster (number)54Ranked 17th▼ 3· 2024
- Number of destroyed or damaged educational facilities attributed to disasters (number)30Ranked 17th▼ 11· 2018
- Number of destroyed or damaged health facilities attributed to disasters (number)0Ranked 20th· 2016
- Number of directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population (number)6.3Ranked 76th▲ 8· 2018
- Number of disruptions to basic services attributed to disasters (number)915Ranked 7th▼ 22· 2018
- Number of disruptions to educational services attributed to disasters (number)20Ranked 18th▲ 4· 2018
- Number of disruptions to health services attributed to disasters (number)1Ranked 10th▼ 9· 2013
- Number of disruptions to other basic services attributed to disasters (number)895Ranked 6th· 2018
- Number of injured or ill people attributed to disasters (number)211Ranked 33rd▲ 17· 2018
- Number of local governments (number)11Ranked 65th▲ 7· 2018
- Number of local governments that adopt and implement local DRR strategies in line with national strategies (number)11Ranked 45th▲ 8· 2018
- Number of missing persons due to disaster (number)0Ranked 17th▲ 1· 2024
- Number of other destroyed or damaged critical infrastructure units and facilities attributed to disasters (number)11Ranked 15th▼ 3· 2018
- Number of people affected by disaster (number)305Ranked 80th▲ 8· 2018
- Number of people below $1.90 a day (2011 prices)36,706Ranked 48th▼ 12· 2016
- Number of people whose damaged dwellings were attributed to disasters (number)88Ranked 65th▲ 17· 2018
- Number of people whose destroyed dwellings were attributed to disasters (number)3Ranked 56th▲ 22· 2018
- Number of people whose livelihoods were disrupted or destroyed, attributed to disasters (number)3Ranked 44th· 2018
- Number of refugees per 100,000 population, by country of origin (per 100,000 population)825.1Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2025
- Number of surveys in the past decade2Ranked 9th—· 2025
- Official development assistance grants for poverty reduction, by recipient countries (percentage of GNI)4Ranked 121st▼ 12· 2024
- Official development assistance grants for poverty reduction, by recipient countries (percentage of GNI)4%Ranked 71st▼ 1· 2023
- Overall loss20.2%Ranked 77th▼ 10· 2023
- Percentage of children (2–14) who experience any violent discipline (UNICEF Global Databases (2016))92%Ranked 2nd· 2014
- Percentage point change in share of people who are religious (2010-2020)0%Ranked 73rd· 2020
- pop_total5.4Ranked 120th—· 2023
- Post-tax national income share, bottom 50%0.13Ranked 142nd▼ 2· 2024
- Post-tax national income share, top 1%0.15Ranked 78th▲ 7· 2024
- Post-tax national income share, top 10%0.49Ranked 48th▲ 6· 2024
- Poverty gap at $2.15/day0Ranked 82nd▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (%)0.3Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Poverty gap at $3.65/day0.02Ranked 130th▼ 2· 2026
- Poverty gap at $4.20 a day (2021 PPP) (%)1.4Ranked 12th▲ 3· 2023
- Poverty gap at $6.85/day0.09Ranked 138th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty gap at $8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (%)8.9Ranked 28th—· 2023
- Poverty gap index ($3 a day)0.33%Ranked 26th▼ 8· 2023
- Poverty headcount ratio at $2.15/day0.01Ranked 74th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $3.65/day0.07Ranked 107th▼ 3· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $4.20 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)6.1Ranked 22nd▼ 1· 2023
- Poverty headcount ratio at $6.85/day0.28Ranked 129th▼ 5· 2026
- Poverty headcount ratio at $8.30 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)28.6Ranked 35th▼ 7· 2023
- Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty lines (% of population)32.8Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2023
- Poverty headcount ratio at societal poverty line (% of population)23.1Ranked 34th▼ 4· 2023
- Poverty severity at $2.15/day0Ranked 55th▼ 2· 2026
- Poverty severity at $3.65/day0.01Ranked 122nd▼ 4· 2026
- Poverty severity at $6.85/day0.04Ranked 137th—· 2026
- Pre-tax national income share, bottom 50%0.1Ranked 134th—· 2024
- Pre-tax national income share, top 1%0.16Ranked 63rd▲ 1· 2024
- Pre-tax national income share, top 10%0.52Ranked 30th—· 2024
- Proportion of children aged 1-14 years who experienced physical punishment and/or psychological aggression by caregivers in last month (% of children aged 1-14 years) - 1 to 14 years old90.1%Ranked 2nd· 2020
- Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls subjected to physical and/or sexual violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by age (%) - 15 to 49 years old19.1%Ranked 27th· 2018
- Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls subjected to physical and/or sexual violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, by age (%) - 15 years old and over17.1%Ranked 25th· 2018
- Proportion of households living in multidimensional poverty (%)18.4Ranked 4th· 2016
- Proportion of individuals who own a mobile telephone, by sex (%)82.7Ranked 75th▼ 7· 2024
- Proportion of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster risk reduction strategies in line with national disaster risk reduction strategies (%)100Ranked 42nd▲ 7· 2018
- Proportion of people living below 50 percent of median income (%)14.7Ranked 17th▼ 18· 2023
- Proportion of population below international poverty line (%)2.1Ranked 17th▲ 3· 2023
- Proportion of population living below the national poverty line (%)32.8Ranked 33rd▼ 5· 2023
- Proportion of population living in multidimensional poverty (%)24Ranked 21st· 2016
- Proportion of population reporting having felt discriminated against, by grounds of discrimination, sex and disability (%)7.3Ranked 21st▲ 8· 2023
- Proportion of population using basic drinking water services, by location (%)98.8Ranked 46th—· 2024
- Proportion of population using basic sanitation services, by location (%)99.4Ranked 25th▲ 2· 2024
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services (%)40.3Ranked 74th▲ 25· 2021
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, education (%)20.7Ranked 7th▼ 10· 2021
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, health (%)13.7Ranked 47th▲ 1· 2021
- Proportion of total government spending on essential services, social protection (%)6Ranked 78th▲ 14· 2021
- Proportion of women aged 20-24 years who were married or in a union before age 15 (%)0.7%Ranked 7th· 2020
- Prosperity gap2.9Ranked 18th▼ 16· 2023
- Prosperity gap (average shortfall from a prosperity standard of $28/day)2.9Ranked 15th▼ 11· 2023
- rankdiff_hdi_phdi16Ranked 21st· 2023
- Regulatory capital to assets (%)8.5Ranked 68th▼ 2· 2023
- Regulatory Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (%)14.5Ranked 37th▼ 9· 2023
- Returned refugees24Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2025
- Return on assets (%)1.1Ranked 112th▲ 37· 2023
- (S.1.C.1) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 1: Maternity Care (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.1.C.2) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 2: Life Saving Commodities (%)85Ranked 3rd· 2022
- (S.1.C.3) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 3: Abortion0Ranked 8th· 2022
- (S.1.C.4) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 4: Post-Abortion Care (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.1) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 1: Maternity Care (%)71Ranked 19th· 2022
- (S.2.C.5) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 5: Contraceptive Services (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.2.C.6) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 6: Contraceptive Consent (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.2.C.7) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 7: Emergency Contraception (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.2) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 2: Contraceptive and Family Planning (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.3.C.8) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 8: Sexuality Education Curriculum Laws (%)0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.3.C.9) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 9: Sexuality Education Curriculum Topics (%)0Ranked 6th· 2022
- (S.3) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 3: Sexuality Education (%)0Ranked 7th· 2022
- (S.4.C.10) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 10: HIV Counselling and Test Services100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.4.C.11) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 11: HIV Treatment and Care Services (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.4.C.12) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 12: HIV Confidentiality (%)100Ranked 1st· 2022
- (S.4.C.13) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Component 13: HPV Vaccine (%)0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- (S.4) Extent to which countries have laws and regulations that guarantee full and equal access to women and men aged 15 years and older to sexual and reproductive health care, information and education: Section 4: HIV and HPV (%)75Ranked 6th· 2022
- Score of adoption and implementation of national DRR strategies in line with the Sendai Framework0.4Ranked 23rd▼ 3· 2018
- se_f70.6Ranked 87th▲ 2· 2023
- Self-reported life satisfaction4.7Ranked 106th▲ 1· 2025
- Self-reported life satisfaction (up to 29 years)5.1Ranked 98th· 2023
- Self-reported life satisfaction (up to 29 years)5.1Ranked 98th· 2023
- se_m68.3Ranked 94th▲ 3· 2023
- Share according to the World Inequality Database15.4%Ranked 2nd▼ 57· 2023
- Share agreeing "most people can be trusted"15.8%Ranked 35th· 2014
- Share in extreme monetary poverty2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share in extreme poverty2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share in extreme poverty2.1%Ranked 36th—· 2023
- Share of children engaged in economic activity (ages 5-17)6.3%Ranked 6th· 2020
- Share of children who are underweight2.1%Ranked 20th▼ 18· 2020
- Share of firms with a female top manager2.7%Ranked 45th▲ 7· 2023
- Share of girls engaged in labor3.3%Ranked 8th· 2020
- Share of people who attend religious services frequently58.5%Ranked 16th· 2014
- Share of people who pray frequently90.5%Ranked 7th· 2014
- Share of women aged 15-19 years old who are married or in a union7.9%Ranked 46th▼ 9· 2020
- Share of women aged 15-49 years old who are married or in a union58.8%Ranked 36th▼ 1· 2050
- Share (top 10%, wealth)64%Ranked 51st—· 2024
- Share (top 1%, wealth)29.9%Ranked 54th▼ 1· 2024
- Share who say religion is "very important"87.5%Ranked 12th· 2014
- Survey mean consumption or income per capita, bottom 40% of population (2021 PPP $ per day)6.7Ranked 30th▲ 24· 2023
- Survey mean consumption or income per capita, total population (2021 PPP $ per day)15Ranked 30th▲ 24· 2023
- There is legislation specifically addressing domestic violence (1=yes; 0=no)0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Total assistance for development, by recipient countries (millions of current United States dollars)4,556.9Ranked 17th▼ 14· 2024
- Total shortfall ($3 a day)18.76MRanked 36th▼ 20· 2023
- Trust: Confidence in the churches68.1%Ranked 28th· 2014
- Trust: Confidence in the United Nations8.2%Ranked 58th· 2014
- Trust in others15.8%Ranked 35th· 2014
- Trust people of another religion17.2%Ranked 52nd· 2014
- Universities63.7%Ranked 36th· 2014
- Very important65.6%Ranked 30th· 2014
- Very important95.7%Ranked 18th· 2014
- Very important43.8%Ranked 39th· 2014
- Very important27.8%Ranked 48th· 2014
- Very important16.7%Ranked 22nd· 2014
- Very important87.5%Ranked 12th· 2014
- Very important55.7%Ranked 24th· 2014
- Watts index at $2.15/day0Ranked 120th▲ 6· 2026
- Watts index at $3.65/day0.02Ranked 80th▲ 1· 2026
- Watts index at $6.85/day0.12Ranked 80th—· 2026
- WBL: Legal Framework Index (scale 0-100)22.8Ranked 171st· 2025
- WBL: Supportive Framework Index (scale 0-100)25.4Ranked 151st· 2025
- Woman chief executive (31st December)0Ranked 1st—· 1948
- Woman head of government (31st December)0Ranked 1st—· 1948
- Woman head of state (31st December)0Ranked 2nd—· 1948
- Women4.8Ranked 1st—· 2013
- Women, Business and the Law Index26.25Ranked 76th▲ 1· 2023
- Women can apply for a passport in the same way as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women can get a divorce on the same terms as men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Women can get a job in the same way as men0Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Women can register a business on the same terms as men1Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Women who were first married by age 18 (% of women ages 20-24)13.4%Ranked 6th· 2020
- [World Bank] Proportion of population covered by social assistance programs (%)21Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2016
- [World Bank] Proportion of population covered by social insurance programs (%)4Ranked 20th· 2016
- Youth NEET rate25.4%Ranked 132nd▼ 10· 2022
- Poverty headcount at $2.15/day0.01Ranked 74th▼ 1· 2026
- Poverty headcount at $3.65/day0.07Ranked 107th▼ 3· 2026
- Poverty headcount at $6.85/day0.28Ranked 129th▼ 5· 2026
- Poverty gap at $2.15/day0Ranked 82nd▼ 1· 2026
- Refugees originating (by country of origin)48,323Ranked 144th—· 2025
- Asylum seekers16,726Ranked 127th▼ 4· 2025
2.5.1 - Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution - ER_GRF_ANIMRCNTN_TRB
- 2.5.1 - Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution - ER_GRF_ANIMRCNTN_TRB0Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2025
- 2.a.1 agriculture orientation index for government expenditures - Value ()0.13Ranked 64th▼ 8· 2023
- Affordability of a healthy diet: ratio of cost to food expenditures72%Ranked 52nd· 2021
- Affordability of a nutrient adequate diet: ratio of cost to food expenditures43%Ranked 52nd· 2021
- Agricultural irrigated land (% of total agricultural land)3.7Ranked 38th▲ 14· 2013
- Agricultural irrigated land (% of total agricultural land)3.7%Ranked 37th▲ 13· 2013
- Agricultural land391.2Ranked 151st—· 2024
- Agricultural land (% of land area)64.9%Ranked 31st—· 2023
- Agricultural land (% of land area)64.9Ranked 31st—· 2023
- Agricultural land (sq. km)3,912Ranked 151st—· 2023
- Agricultural land use391,200Ranked 152nd—· 2023
- Agricultural land use391,200Ranked 152nd—· 2023
- Agricultural land use per capita0.07Ranked 175th—· 2023
- Agriculture6.3%Ranked 109th▲ 2· 2022
- Agriculture6.3%Ranked 125th—· 2022
- Agriculture area under organic agric. - Area (hectares)5,162Ranked 111th▲ 1· 2023
- Agriculture as a share of GDP5.5%Ranked 101st▼ 4· 2024
- agriculture_ha110,620.9Ranked 151st—· 2010
- Agriculture orientation index for government expenditures0.08Ranked 70th▼ 3· 2024
- Agriculture share of Government Expenditure (%)0.65Ranked 100th▼ 15· 2024
- Agriculture value added share of GDP (%)8.6Ranked 50th▼ 34· 2024
- All fertilizers use8,359.8Ranked 140th▼ 2· 2023
- Antibiotic use in livestock94.7Ranked 35th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (mg per population corrected units)94.7Ranked 39th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (mg per population corrected units)94.7Ranked 39th· 2020
- Antimicrobial usage in livestock (tonnes)9.2Ranked 133rd· 2020
- Apple production777.9Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2022
- Aquaculture32Ranked 165th▲ 27· 2024
- Aquaculture production32Ranked 165th▲ 27· 2024
- Aquaculture production (metric tons)32Ranked 165th▲ 27· 2024
- Arable land41.9Ranked 161st—· 2024
- Arable land (hectares)41,900Ranked 160th▲ 1· 2023
- Arable land (hectares per person)0.01Ranked 192nd—· 2023
- Arable land (hectares per person)0.01Ranked 192nd—· 2023
- Arable land (% of land area)7%Ranked 119th—· 2023
- Arable land (% of land area)7Ranked 119th—· 2023
- Area of permanent meadows and pastures278,000Ranked 134th—· 2023
- Average precipitation in depth (mm per year)402Ranked 146th—· 2021
- Avocado production7,000Ranked 44th▼ 1· 2022
- Banana production3,379Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2022
- Banana production3,379Ranked 97th▲ 1· 2022
- Banana yields36.7Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2022
- Barley production12,750.9Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2022
- Barley yield2.4Ranked 66th▲ 5· 2022
- Beef and buffalo meat production13,415.9Ranked 131st▲ 5· 2022
- Business-as-usual-17Ranked 110th· 2050
- Cattle meat yield per animal287Ranked 25th▼ 8· 2022
- Cereal production46,264.6Ranked 151st—· 2022
- Cereal production (metric tons)51,014.4Ranked 148th▼ 1· 2023
- Cereals, primary production46,264.6Ranked 151st—· 2022
- Cereal yield (kg per hectare)2,464.7Ranked 103rd▲ 3· 2023
- Cereal yields2.5Ranked 104th▲ 11· 2022
- Cereal yields2.5Ranked 104th▲ 11· 2022
- Cereal yields2.5Ranked 104th▲ 11· 2022
- Change in agriculture area with respect to one decade back-5.6%Ranked 150th▲ 8· 2023
- Chicken meat production34,318Ranked 116th▲ 4· 2022
- Chicken meat yield per animal1.4Ranked 83rd▼ 1· 2022
- Coefficient of Variation (CV) of caloric intake0.37Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2020
- Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2024
- Country area602.5Ranked 166th▼ 1· 2024
- Cropland113.2Ranked 155th—· 2024
- Cropland0.02Ranked 150th▲ 2· 2010
- Cropland area113,200Ranked 156th▲ 2· 2023
- Cropland area113,200Ranked 156th▲ 2· 2023
- Cropland area113,200Ranked 156th▲ 2· 2023
- Crop production index (2014-2016 = 100)116.8Ranked 57th▲ 9· 2022
- Egg production29,100Ranked 99th—· 2022
- Egg production per bird14.6Ranked 37th▼ 14· 2022
- Estimated number of farmed fish2MRanked 72nd▼ 4· 2022
- Excess nitrogen per hectare of cropland149.7Ranked 16th· 2009
- Excess phosphorous per hectare of cropland37.9Ranked 14th· 2009
- Female employment in agriculture6.3%Ranked 109th▲ 2· 2022
- Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)199.5Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2023
- Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)199.5Ranked 37th▲ 3· 2023
- Fertilizer use per hectare of cropland73.9Ranked 89th▲ 8· 2023
- Food aid received20.09MRanked 20th▲ 3· 2016
- Food exports (% of merchandise exports)21.4%Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2023
- Food - Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) (thousand US Dollar)1.91BRanked 106th▲ 1· 2022
- Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)111.8Ranked 73rd▲ 23· 2022
- Forest area (sq. km)101.4Ranked 186th—· 2023
- Forest land11.1Ranked 182nd—· 2025
- Fruit, primary production177,673.2Ranked 129th▲ 2· 2022
- Grape production47,000Ranked 59th—· 2022
- Gross production value of the agricultural sector1.86BRanked 113th▲ 6· 2022
- Groundnut yields5Ranked 4th—· 2022
- Hypothetical number of land animals that would be slaughtered if all countries produced meat in the same way as a given country37.04BRanked 115th▲ 5· 2022
- Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Consumer Food Price Index2.3Ranked 3rd▼ 87· 2024
- Indicator of Food Price Anomalies (IFPA), by Consumer Food Price Index0.33Ranked 89th▲ 33· 2023
- Insecticide use255Ranked 102nd▼ 2· 2023
- Land area602.5Ranked 166th—· 2024
- Land area (sq. km)6,025Ranked 166th—· 2023
- Land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.15Ranked 163rd—· 2015
- Land (crop, pasture)4,254Ranked 93rd▲ 51· 2014
- Land under cereal production (hectares)20,698Ranked 148th▼ 3· 2023
- Land used for cereal production18,348Ranked 152nd—· 2022
- Lettuce yields16.7Ranked 60th▲ 30· 2022
- Life expectancy at birth65.2Ranked 187th▲ 110· 2023
- Livestock production index (2014-2016 = 100)104.6Ranked 107th▲ 60· 2022
- Machinery per unit of agricultural land0.67Ranked 61st▲ 2· 2019
- Male employment in agriculture6.4%Ranked 134th▼ 4· 2022
- Meat, total production63,177.5Ranked 140th▲ 3· 2022
- Milk production304,000Ranked 111th—· 2022
- Milk production per animal372.5Ranked 135th▼ 4· 2022
- Milk, total production304,000Ranked 111th—· 2022
- nitrogen_applied_per_ha184.1Ranked 17th· 2009
- Nitrogen fertilizer use5,478Ranked 141st▲ 1· 2023
- Nitrogen fertilizer use5,478Ranked 141st▲ 1· 2023
- Nitrogen use efficiency98.3%Ranked 24th▼ 20· 2014
- Number of cattle41,590Ranked 161st▲ 2· 2022
- Number of cattle slaughtered for meat127.9Ranked 132nd▲ 4· 2022
- Number of cattle slaughtered for meat46,687Ranked 132nd▲ 4· 2022
- Number of chickens slaughtered to produce meat23.8MRanked 116th▼ 1· 2022
- Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution0Ranked 20th—· 2025
- Number of local breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution0Ranked 20th▲ 1· 2025
- Number of local breeds kept in the country2Ranked 75th▲ 4· 2025
- Number of local breeds (not extinct) (number)2Ranked 76th▲ 3· 2025
- Number of local breeds with unknown risk status (number)0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Number of moderately or severely food insecure people1.5MRanked 67th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of people employed in agriculture70,159Ranked 141st▼ 3· 2022
- Number of people who cannot afford sufficient calories100,000Ranked 64th· 2021
- Number of policies5Ranked 77th· 2022
- Number of poultry birds5.68MRanked 127th▲ 5· 2022
- Number of severely food insecure people300,000Ranked 44th▼ 3· 2023
- Number of severely food insecure people (3-year avg)0.2Ranked 2nd—· 2023
- Number of transboundary breeds for which sufficient genetic resources are stored for reconstitution0Ranked 16th▼ 1· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)4Ranked 71st▼ 2· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds (not extinct) (number)4Ranked 77th—· 2025
- Number of transboundary breeds with unknown risk status (number)0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)48.4Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2023
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)48.4Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2023
- Nutrient nitrogen n (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)48.4Ranked 85th▲ 7· 2023
- Nutrient phosphate p2o5 (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)18.6Ranked 49th▼ 3· 2023
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) - Use per area of cropland (kilograms per hectare)6.9Ranked 99th▲ 3· 2023
- Nutrient potash k2o (total) - Use per capita (Kilograms per capita)0.14Ranked 126th▼ 4· 2023
- Orange production6,167.9Ranked 87th▲ 3· 2022
- Orange yields24.3Ranked 22nd▼ 2· 2022
- Pea production121.3Ranked 91st▼ 1· 2022
- Pea yields2.9Ranked 16th▲ 9· 2022
- Percentage of children under five years of age who are stunted (Percent)8%Ranked 83rd▼ 4· 2024
- Permanent cropland (% of land area)11.8Ranked 21st—· 2023
- Phosphorous inputs per hectare of cropland45.4Ranked 14th· 2009
- Population in moderate or severe food insecurity (thousands of people)1,459.4Ranked 76th▼ 3· 2023
- Population in severe food insecurity (thousands of people)339.9Ranked 75th▼ 8· 2023
- Potash fertilizer production0Ranked 25th▼ 4· 2023
- Potatoes yield36.6Ranked 14th▲ 5· 2022
- Potato production82,000Ranked 110th▼ 1· 2022
- Poultry meat production34,318Ranked 117th▲ 4· 2022
- Poultry meat yield per animal1.4Ranked 87th▲ 5· 2022
- Prevalence of anaemia among women of reproductive age24.8%Ranked 60th▼ 3· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity (3-year avg)27.4%Ranked 66th▼ 4· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)27Ranked 59th▼ 10· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the population (%)27Ranked 59th▼ 10· 2023
- Prevalence of moderate or severe food insecurity in the total population27%Ranked 59th▼ 10· 2023
- Prevalence of obesity in the adult population37.4%Ranked 132nd▼ 4· 2024
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%)6.3Ranked 48th▼ 16· 2023
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the population (%)6.3Ranked 48th▼ 16· 2023
- Prevalence of severe food insecurity in the total population6.3%Ranked 48th▼ 16· 2023
- Prevalence of stunting in children under 58.8%Ranked 60th—· 2024
- Production of sesame oil1,207.3Ranked 39th▼ 10· 2022
- Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture3.8Ranked 14th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)50Ranked 18th▼ 2· 2025
- Proportion of local breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)50%Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2025
- Proportion of transboundary breeds classified as being at risk of extinction as a share of local breeds with known level of extinction risk (%)0Ranked 1st—· 2025
- [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture, current status score4.5Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- [PROXY] Progress toward productive and sustainable agriculture, trend score4.5Ranked 5th▲ 1· 2024
- Retail31.5Ranked 11th▼ 19· 2022
- Roots and tubers, total production85,620.1Ranked 145th▼ 1· 2022
- Rural land area (sq. km)4,390.9Ranked 167th—· 2015
- Rural land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.02Ranked 168th▲ 1· 2015
- Rural land area where elevation is below 5 meters (sq. km)1.4Ranked 170th▲ 1· 2015
- Sesame seed production222.8Ranked 63rd▼ 4· 2022
- Share of arable land that is organic1.3%Ranked 66th▲ 3· 2023
- Share of employment in agriculture6.3%Ranked 125th—· 2022
- Share of employment in agriculture6.3%Ranked 125th—· 2022
- Share of land used for permanent meadows and pastures46.1%Ranked 20th▼ 1· 2023
- Share of people employed in agricultural sector6.2%Ranked 127th—· 2022
- Share of people employed in agricultural sector6.2%Ranked 127th—· 2022
- Share of the population defined as severely food insecure6.3%Ranked 48th▼ 16· 2023
- Share of workers in informal employment in the agricultural sector91%Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2022
- Share of workers in informal employment in the agricultural sector91%Ranked 33rd▲ 5· 2022
- Sorghum yields1.2Ranked 67th▲ 3· 2022
- Staples (cereals and roots)0.59Ranked 31st· 2021
- Sugar beet production100Ranked 59th▲ 1· 2000
- Sugar beet yield33.3Ranked 30th▼ 2· 2000
- Sunflower seed production0.46Ranked 74th—· 2022
- Sunflower seed yields0.96Ranked 60th▲ 4· 2022
- Surface area (sq. km)6,025Ranked 167th—· 2023
- Sweet potato production2,928.5Ranked 83rd▼ 1· 2022
- Taylor and Rising (2021)76,520.3Ranked 147th—· 2010
- Taylor and Rising (2021)110,620.9Ranked 151st—· 2010
- Taylor and Rising (2021)34,100.6Ranked 151st▲ 1· 2010
- Tobacco production1,405.9Ranked 78th▲ 18· 2022
- Tomato production239,000Ranked 64th▼ 1· 2022
- Tomato yields204.8Ranked 12th▼ 1· 2022
- total_applied_nitrogen24,182.4Ranked 121st· 2009
- total_applied_phosphorous5,963.2Ranked 119th· 2009
- Total meat production63,177.5Ranked 140th▲ 3· 2022
- Total meat production63,177.5Ranked 140th▲ 3· 2022
- Total official flows (disbursements) for agriculture, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)37.8MRanked 73rd▼ 8· 2023
- Total official flows (disbursements) for agriculture, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)28.4Ranked 78th▲ 5· 2024
- Total pesticide use1,348Ranked 104th▼ 1· 2023
- Total pesticide use per area of cropland11.9Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2023
- Urban land area (sq. km)1,629.7Ranked 100th▼ 3· 2015
- Urban land area where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total land area)0.12Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2015
- Urban land area where elevation is below 5 meters (sq. km)7.4Ranked 133rd▲ 5· 2015
- Value added per worker14,072.1Ranked 60th▲ 5· 2022
- Vegetables, primary production699,848.1Ranked 89th▲ 3· 2022
- Wheat2.6Ranked 75th▲ 18· 2022
- Wheat2.6Ranked 75th▲ 18· 2022
- Wheat production32,811Ranked 89th—· 2022
- Wheat yield2.6Ranked 75th▲ 18· 2022
- Wheat yields2.6Ranked 75th▲ 18· 2022
- Wheat yields2.6Ranked 75th▲ 18· 2022
- Wine production0Ranked 69th—· 2013
12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%) - ER_FFS_CMPT_GDP
- 12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%) - ER_FFS_CMPT_GDP5.1%Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2020
- 12.c.1 - Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars) - ER_FFS_CMPT_PC_CD141.5Ranked 30th▲ 2· 2020
- Access to electricity, rural (% of rural population)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population)100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Affordability of an energy sufficient diet: ratio of cost to food expenditures27%Ranked 32nd· 2021
- Annual change in primary energy consumption0.88%Ranked 132nd▼ 11· 2024
- Annual change in primary energy consumption0.23Ranked 106th▼ 33· 2024
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Clean (GW)0.3Ranked 122nd▼ 3· 2024
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (GW)0.14Ranked 145th—· 2024
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (GW)0.14Ranked 130th▲ 3· 2024
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (GW)0Ranked 123rd—· 2024
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (GW)0.3Ranked 121st▼ 3· 2024
- Capacity — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (GW)0.3Ranked 87th▼ 5· 2024
- Capacity — Fuel — Bioenergy (GW)0Ranked 61st▲ 2· 2024
- Capacity — Fuel — Gas (GW)0.14Ranked 107th▲ 4· 2024
- Capacity — Fuel — Hydro (GW)0Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2024
- Capacity — Fuel — Nuclear (GW)0Ranked 33rd—· 2024
- Capacity — Fuel — Other Renewables (GW)0Ranked 19th▲ 1· 2024
- Capacity — Fuel — Solar (GW)0.3Ranked 82nd▲ 4· 2024
- Capacity — Fuel — Wind (GW)0Ranked 75th▲ 1· 2024
- Coal production0Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2016
- Coal production per capita0Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2016
- Coal production per capita0Ranked 66th▼ 1· 2016
- Cost of an energy sufficient diet1Ranked 42nd· 2021
- Electricity demand8Ranked 115th—· 2024
- Electricity demand — Demand — Demand (TWh)8Ranked 114th—· 2024
- Electricity demand — Demand per capita — Demand per capita (MWh)1.5Ranked 111th▼ 10· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Clean (%)39.4%Ranked 84th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Clean (TWh)0.39Ranked 140th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (%)60.6%Ranked 97th—· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (TWh)0.6Ranked 137th▼ 10· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (%)60.6%Ranked 76th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (TWh)0.6Ranked 126th▼ 9· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (%)0%Ranked 155th▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (TWh)0Ranked 136th▼ 3· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (%)39.4%Ranked 74th—· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (TWh)0.39Ranked 139th▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (%)39.4%Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (TWh)0.39Ranked 90th▼ 5· 2024
- Electricity generation from coal0Ranked 76th▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from coal0Ranked 76th▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from coal per person0Ranked 79th▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from coal per person0Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels0.6Ranked 136th▼ 9· 2024
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels0.6Ranked 137th▼ 10· 2024
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels0.6Ranked 136th▼ 9· 2024
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person109.2Ranked 156th▼ 11· 2024
- Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person109.2Ranked 157th▼ 12· 2024
- Electricity generation from gas0Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from gas per person0Ranked 117th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from hydropower0Ranked 123rd▼ 11· 2024
- Electricity generation from hydropower per person0Ranked 146th▼ 4· 2024
- Electricity generation from low-carbon sources0.39Ranked 140th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from low-carbon sources per person71Ranked 153rd▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from nuclear0Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from nuclear power per person0Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from oil0.6Ranked 82nd▼ 9· 2024
- Electricity generation from oil per person109.2Ranked 93rd▼ 16· 2024
- Electricity generation from other renewables, excluding bioenergy0Ranked 21st▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from other renewables, including bioenergy0Ranked 83rd▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from renewables0.39Ranked 139th▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation from renewables per person71Ranked 153rd▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power0.39Ranked 90th▼ 3· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power0.39Ranked 90th▼ 3· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar and wind power per person71Ranked 101st▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power0.39Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from solar power per person71Ranked 89th▲ 5· 2024
- Electricity generation from wind power0Ranked 85th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from wind power0Ranked 85th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation from wind power per person0Ranked 106th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Bioenergy (%)0%Ranked 112th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Bioenergy (TWh)0Ranked 80th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Coal (%)0%Ranked 81st▼ 3· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Coal (TWh)0Ranked 77th▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Gas (%)0%Ranked 117th—· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Gas (TWh)0Ranked 114th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Hydro (%)0%Ranked 144th▼ 3· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Hydro (TWh)0Ranked 123rd▼ 10· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Nuclear (%)0%Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Nuclear (TWh)0Ranked 31st▼ 2· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Fossil (%)60.6%Ranked 37th▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Fossil (TWh)0.6Ranked 82nd▼ 9· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Renewables (%)0%Ranked 23rd—· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Other Renewables (TWh)0Ranked 23rd▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Solar (%)39.4%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Solar (TWh)0.39Ranked 83rd▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Wind (%)0%Ranked 104th▼ 1· 2024
- Electricity generation — Fuel — Wind (TWh)0Ranked 87th—· 2024
- Electricity generation — Total — Total Generation (TWh)0.99Ranked 154th▲ 1· 2024
- Electricity imports — Electricity imports — Net Imports (TWh)7Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2024
- Electricity production from coal sources (% of total)0Ranked 91st—· 2021
- Electricity production from hydroelectric sources (% of total)0Ranked 157th—· 2021
- Electricity production from natural gas sources (% of total)0Ranked 120th▲ 2· 2021
- Electricity production from nuclear sources (% of total)0Ranked 33rd—· 2021
- Electricity production from oil, gas and coal sources (% of total)75.5Ranked 94th▲ 5· 2021
- Electricity production from oil sources (% of total)75.5Ranked 48th▲ 1· 2021
- Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (kWh)224.28MRanked 108th—· 2021
- Electricity production from renewable sources, excluding hydroelectric (% of total)24.5Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2021
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (megajoules per constant 2021 purchasing power parity GDP)4.9Ranked 16th▼ 65· 2024
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)3.1Ranked 65th▼ 57· 2022
- Energy intensity level of primary energy (MJ/$2021 PPP GDP)3.1Ranked 65th▼ 57· 2022
- Fossil fuels75.5%Ranked 93rd▲ 5· 2021
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)200MRanked 2nd▼ 63· 2024
- Gas production0Ranked 96th▲ 2· 2016
- Gas production0Ranked 96th▲ 2· 2016
- Gas production per capita0Ranked 96th▲ 1· 2016
- Gas production per capita0Ranked 96th▲ 1· 2016
- Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity (watts per capita)36.2Ranked 164th—· 2024
- Installed renewable electricity-generating capacity (watts per capita) - All renewables35.5Ranked 160th▲ 5· 2023
- International financial flows to developing countries in support of clean energy R&D and renewable energy production11.21MRanked 75th▲ 10· 2023
- International financial flows to developing countries in support of clean energy research and development and renewable energy production, including in hybrid systems (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)2Ranked 103rd▲ 22· 2024
- Investment in energy with private participation (current US$)150MRanked 13th· 2000
- Lifecycle carbon intensity of electricity generation414.1Ranked 105th▲ 3· 2024
- Minimum dietary energy requirement1,738Ranked 118th▼ 9· 2024
- Net electricity imports7Ranked 14th▲ 2· 2024
- Net electricity imports as a share of demand87.6%Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Number of people with access to electricity5.17MRanked 112th—· 2023
- Number of people without access to electricity0Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2023
- Number of people without access to electricity0Ranked 88th▲ 4· 2023
- Oil production0Ranked 100th—· 2016
- Oil production per capita0Ranked 100th—· 2016
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Clean (mtCO2)0.02Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Fossil (mtCO2)0.39Ranked 28th▲ 4· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Gas and Other Fossil (mtCO2)0.39Ranked 31st▲ 4· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Hydro, Bioenergy and Other Renewables (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Renewables (mtCO2)0.02Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Aggregate fuel — Wind and Solar (mtCO2)0.02Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — CO2 intensity — CO2 intensity (gCO2/kWh)414.1Ranked 84th▼ 2· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Bioenergy (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Coal (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Gas (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Hydro (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Nuclear (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Other Fossil (mtCO2)0.39Ranked 35th▲ 9· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Other Renewables (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Solar (mtCO2)0.02Ranked 3rd—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Fuel — Wind (mtCO2)0Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Power sector emissions — Total — Total emissions (mtCO2)0.41Ranked 34th▲ 6· 2024
- Primary energy consumption27Ranked 134th—· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per capita4,920.4Ranked 148th▲ 2· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per capita4,920.4Ranked 148th▲ 2· 2024
- Primary energy consumption per GDP1.1Ranked 63rd▼ 25· 2022
- Primary energy consumption per GDP1.1Ranked 65th▼ 25· 2022
- Primary school100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Proportion of population with access to electricity, by urban/rural (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Public private partnerships investment in energy (current US$)150MRanked 9th· 2000
- Renewable capacity: Bioenergy0.34Ranked 134th▼ 1· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Solar photovoltaic308.4Ranked 94th▲ 4· 2025
- Renewable capacity: Total renewable energy308.7Ranked 134th—· 2025
- Renewable electricity output (% of total electricity output)24.5Ranked 97th▼ 5· 2021
- Renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption (%)18.1%Ranked 111th▼ 5· 2022
- Renewable energy share in the total final energy consumption (%)21.2Ranked 31st▼ 70· 2024
- Renewable generation: Solar photovoltaic350.5Ranked 86th▲ 6· 2023
- Renewable generation: Total renewable energy350.8Ranked 146th—· 2023
- Renewables (excl. hydroelectric)24.5%Ranked 28th▼ 2· 2021
- Share of electricity generated by bioenergy0%Ranked 122nd▼ 1· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by coal0%Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by coal0%Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by coal0%Ranked 81st▼ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by fossil fuels60.6%Ranked 97th▼ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by gas0%Ranked 117th▼ 1· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by hydropower0%Ranked 146th▼ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by low-carbon sources39.4%Ranked 85th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by nuclear power0%Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by nuclear power0%Ranked 32nd▼ 1· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by oil60.6%Ranked 37th—· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by renewables39.4%Ranked 74th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by solar and wind power39.4%Ranked 11th▲ 2· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by solar power39.4%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of electricity generated by wind power0%Ranked 106th—· 2024
- Share of final energy consumption used by agriculture, forestry and fishing0.64%Ranked 127th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of rural population with access100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Share of the population with access to electricity100%Ranked 1st—· 2023
- Solar photovoltaic capacity0.2Ranked 94th—· 2024
- Total electricity demand per person1,453.9Ranked 124th▼ 4· 2024
- Total electricity generation0.99Ranked 154th▲ 1· 2024
- Total electricity generation per person180.1Ranked 167th▼ 9· 2024
- Total electricity generation per person180.1Ranked 169th▼ 9· 2024
- Total solar capacity0.2Ranked 98th▲ 1· 2024
17.7.1 - Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars) - DC_ENVTECH_IMP
- 17.7.1 - Amount of tracked imported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars) - DC_ENVTECH_IMP195.73MRanked 105th▼ 15· 2020
- Absolute deaths from ambient PM2.5 air pollution- State of Global Air1,000Ranked 10th▲ 2· 2015
- Agricultural water withdrawal189MRanked 78th▼ 15· 2005
- Agricultural water withdrawals49.2%Ranked 105th—· 2021
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (% of GDP)5.5%Ranked 101st▼ 4· 2024
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added per worker (constant 2015 US$)14,072.1Ranked 60th▲ 5· 2022
- Amount of tracked exported Environmentally Sound Technologies (current United States dollars)46.56MRanked 88th▼ 10· 2020
- Annual area burnt by wildfires214Ranked 153rd▲ 8· 2026
- Annual area burnt per wildfire107Ranked 157th▼ 3· 2026
- Annual change in domestic forest area0Ranked 78th—· 2025
- Annual change in forest area0Ranked 78th—· 2025
- Annual change in forest area as share of forest area0%Ranked 80th—· 2025
- Annual forest area change rate (%)0.49Ranked 25th▲ 11· 2025
- Annual forest area change rate (%)0.19%Ranked 39th▲ 21· 2020
- Annual forest change0%Ranked 79th—· 2025
- Annual freshwater withdrawals334.8MRanked 142nd▲ 3· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, agriculture (% of total freshwater withdrawal)49.2%Ranked 105th—· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, agriculture (% of total freshwater withdrawal)49.2Ranked 105th—· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal)56.4Ranked 29th▼ 17· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, domestic (% of total freshwater withdrawal)56.4%Ranked 29th▼ 17· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, industry (% of total freshwater withdrawal)8.9Ranked 87th▼ 2· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, industry (% of total freshwater withdrawal)8.9%Ranked 87th▼ 2· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters)0.33Ranked 142nd▲ 3· 2021
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources)41.2Ranked 38th▲ 2· 2021
- Annual mean levels of fine particulate matter (population-weighted), by location (micrograms per cubic meter) - Urban31.3Ranked 50th▼ 3· 2019
- Annual number of fires2Ranked 119th▼ 12· 2026
- Annual number of fires2Ranked 119th▼ 12· 2026
- Annual share of the total land area burnt by wildfires0.04%Ranked 116th—· 2026
- AQLI17.8Ranked 71st—· 2024
- Area from inland water bodies18,030Ranked 135th—· 2019
- Area of degraded mountain land (square kilometres)366.4Ranked 110th—· 2021
- Area of planted forest1,340Ranked 162nd—· 2025
- Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)48.1%Ranked 78th—· 2024
- Average proportion of Freshwater Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)48Ranked 82nd—· 2025
- Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)21.8%Ranked 133rd—· 2024
- Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)21.8Ranked 136th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)23.5Ranked 167th—· 2025
- Average proportion of Terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%)23.5%Ranked 162nd—· 2024
- Basel Convention60%Ranked 3rd▲ 1· 2025
- Basic (including soap and water)94.9%Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2024
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the beach (%)80.4Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the beach (Tonnes)975Ranked 99th▲ 1· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the ocean (%)19.6Ranked 99th▲ 4· 2021
- Beach litter originating from national land-based sources that ends in the ocean (Tonnes)237Ranked 104th—· 2021
- Beef0.13Ranked 123rd▲ 2· 2020
- Bird species, threatened16Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2022
- Bird species, threatened16Ranked 46th▲ 2· 2022
- Bottom trawl83.7Ranked 95th—· 2018
- Capture fisheries production (metric tons)250Ranked 194th▲ 34· 2024
- Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)0.96%Ranked 95th▲ 93· 2022
- Chlorophyll-a deviations, remote sensing (%)0.96Ranked 104th▲ 102· 2022
- Consumption of controlled substance (relative to 1986) - Chemical: All (Ozone-depleting)0.04Ranked 122nd▲ 78· 2021
- Consumption of controlled substance (zero-filled) - Chemical: All (Ozone-depleting)0.14Ranked 119th▲ 85· 2021
- Countries that are contracting Parties to the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries that are parties to the Nagoya Protocol (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2024
- Countries that established national targets in accordance with Aichi Biodiversity Target 2 of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 in their National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd· 2022
- Countries that established national targets in accordance with or similar to Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Target 14 in their national biodiversity strategy and action plans (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd· 2026
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported through the Online Reporting System on Compliance of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (PGRFA) (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries that have legislative, administrative and policy framework or measures reported to the Access and Benefit-Sharing Clearing-House (1 = YES; 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- Countries with an allocation from the national budget to manage the threat of invasive alien species (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Countries with an allocation from the national budget to manage the threat of invasive alien species (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Countries with procedures in law or policy for participation by service users/communities in planning program in water resources planning and management, by level of definition in procedures (10 = Clearly defined; 5 = Not clearly defined ; 0 = NA)10Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Countries with users/communities participating in planning programs in water resources planning and management, by level of participation (3 = High; 2 = Moderate; 1 = Low; 0 = NA)2Ranked 2nd▲ 1· 2025
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation (%)41%Ranked 53rd· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation (%)41Ranked 53rd· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, enabling environment (%)63Ranked 31st· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, financing (%)27Ranked 44th· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, institutions and participation (%)40Ranked 54th· 2023
- Degree of integrated water resources management implementation, management instruments (%)33Ranked 55th· 2023
- Domestic material consumption per capita, by type of raw material (tonnes) - Total or no breakdown5.5Ranked 135th▼ 10· 2023
- Electronic waste generated, per capita (Kg)4Ranked 17th▲ 12· 2019
- Electronic waste generated (Tonnes)20,000Ranked 18th▲ 10· 2019
- Endemic amphibian species0Ranked 50th· 2025
- Endemic bird species0Ranked 44th· 2025
- Endemic mammal species0Ranked 39th· 2025
- Endemic reef-forming coral species0Ranked 9th· 2025
- Estimated number of wild-caught fish32MRanked 119th· 2019
- Excess nitrogen19,666.7Ranked 101st· 2009
- excess_phosphorous_total4,981.8Ranked 93rd· 2009
- Exported beach litter originating from national land-based sources (Tonnes)1,234Ranked 106th—· 2022
- Exported deforestation0Ranked 142nd▼ 4· 2023
- Fish catch282Ranked 199th▲ 27· 2024
- Fish species, threatened16Ranked 93rd▲ 13· 2022
- Fish species, threatened16Ranked 93rd▲ 13· 2022
- Food waste per capita (KG)53.6Ranked 213th▲ 210· 2022
- Food waste (Tonnes)281,217Ranked 142nd▲ 126· 2022
- Forest area11,100Ranked 183rd—· 2025
- Forest area as a proportion of total land area (%)1.8Ranked 185th▼ 2· 2025
- Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares)0Ranked 84th▲ 3· 2024
- Forest area certified under an independently verified certification scheme (thousands of hectares)0Ranked 83rd▲ 2· 2024
- Forest area (thousands of hectares)11.1Ranked 183rd—· 2025
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) as a proportion of total GDP (%)1.6Ranked 33rd▼ 47· 2024
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) (billions of nominal United States dollars)0.21Ranked 71st▼ 20· 2024
- Fossil-fuel subsidies (consumption and production) per capita (nominal United States dollars)37.3Ranked 58th▼ 34· 2024
- Freshwater crabs0Ranked 26th· 2025
- Hazardous waste exported, (Tonnes)1,285Ranked 52nd▼ 14· 2021
- Hazardous waste generated, per capita (Kg)0.65Ranked 73rd▲ 44· 2016
- Hazardous waste generated, per capita (Kg)1Ranked 61st▲ 3· 2014
- Hazardous waste generated, per unit of GDP (kilograms per constant 2015 United States dollars)0.04Ranked 10th▼ 55· 2016
- Hazardous waste generated (Tonnes)707,791Ranked 34th▼ 35· 2016
- Hazardous waste imported, (Tonnes)0Ranked 46th▲ 8· 2014
- Hazardous waste treated or disposed (Tonnes)4,572Ranked 52nd▲ 1· 2014
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (number of tables)4Ranked 8th—· 2023
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (SEEA tables)0Ranked 5th—· 2023
- Implementation of standard accounting tools to monitor the economic and environmental aspects of tourism (Tourism Satellite Account tables)4Ranked 4th—· 2023
- Imported deforestation1,701.5Ranked 115th▲ 1· 2023
- Imports per person0Ranked 107th▲ 33· 2023
- Industrial3,070Ranked 120th▼ 1· 2018
- Industrial water withdrawal29MRanked 93rd▼ 21· 2005
- Land area in hectares602,500Ranked 167th—· 2023
- Land area (sq. km)6,025Ranked 166th—· 2023
- Land area (thousands of hectares)602.5Ranked 166th—· 2025
- Legislation, Regulation, Act related to the prevention of introduction and management of Invasive Alien Species (1 = YES, 0 = NO)1Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources47.8Ranked 39th▲ 1· 2021
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources (%)45.2Ranked 39th▲ 6· 2023
- Level of water stress: freshwater withdrawal as a proportion of available freshwater resources (%) - No breakdown48.1%Ranked 39th—· 2022
- Mammal species, threatened5Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2022
- Mammal species, threatened5Ranked 47th▼ 2· 2022
- Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters)0Ranked 97th▲ 4· 2025
- Marine protected areas (% of territorial waters)0%Ranked 97th▲ 4· 2025
- Methyl Chloroform0Ranked 1st—· 2021
- Mismanaged plastic waste2,129Ranked 116th· 2019
- Mismanaged plastic waste per capita0.43Ranked 126th· 2019
- Mountain area (square kilometres)3,477Ranked 134th—· 2021
- Mountain Green Cover Index - Total - Mountain Green Cover Index (MGCI)67.2%Ranked 135th▼ 6· 2021
- Municipal waste collected (Tonnes)1.7MRanked 37th▼ 7· 2022
- Municipal waste exported (Tonnes)0Ranked 6th—· 2019
- Municipal waste imported (Tonnes)0Ranked 4th—· 2019
- Municipal waste recycled (Tonnes)119,820Ranked 43rd▼ 5· 2021
- Municipal waste recycled (Tonnes)54,800Ranked 47th▼ 1· 2022
- Municipal water withdrawal200MRanked 82nd▼ 21· 2005
- National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) targets alignment to Aichi Biodiversity target 9 set out in the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2025
- natural_ha_share71.7Ranked 39th▼ 3· 2010
- Net traded deforestation1,701.5Ranked 82nd▲ 7· 2023
- Not using improved drinking water sources0Ranked 168th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of people in rural areas not using improved drinking water sources0Ranked 129th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of people in rural areas not using improved sanitation facilities15,291.3Ranked 101st▼ 6· 2024
- Number of people in rural areas without basic handwashing facilities54,605.2Ranked 77th▼ 4· 2024
- Number of people not using improved drinking water sources0Ranked 156th▼ 3· 2024
- Number of people not using improved sanitation facilities15,291.2Ranked 115th▼ 5· 2024
- Number of people not using safely managed drinking water sources1.06MRanked 68th▼ 1· 2024
- Number of people not using safely managed sanitation1.46MRanked 79th—· 2024
- Number of people using at least a basic drinking water source5.43MRanked 113th▼ 2· 2024
- Number of people with at least basic sanitation5.46MRanked 102nd▼ 3· 2024
- Number of people without basic handwashing facilities279,537.1Ranked 72nd▼ 4· 2024
- Open defecation7,007.3Ranked 68th▼ 4· 2024
- Open defecation7,007.3Ranked 77th▼ 3· 2024
- Open dumps62.8%Ranked 35th· 2020
- Other uses0.08Ranked 122nd▲ 8· 2015
- Outdoor air pollution exposure (population-weighted PM2.5)23.2Ranked 110th▲ 3· 2024
- Ozone concentration72Ranked 13th▲ 2· 2015
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Basel Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)66.7Ranked 3rd▲ 2· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Minamata Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)33.3Ranked 4th▲ 1· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Montreal Protocol on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)100Ranked 1st—· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Rotterdam Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)95.1Ranked 4th▼ 35· 2025
- Parties meeting their commitments and obligations in transmitting information as required by Stockholm Convention on hazardous waste, and other chemicals (%)22.2Ranked 8th· 2025
- Per capita plastic waste0.06Ranked 80th· 2010
- Per capita plastic waste emitted to the ocean0.02Ranked 75th· 2019
- Permanent agriculture0.4Ranked 166th▼ 1· 2024
- Plant species (higher), threatened11Ranked 104th▲ 11· 2022
- Plastic percent of waste composition14.2Ranked 3rd· 2012
- Plastic pollution entering the ocean through rivers118Ranked 36th· 2019
- Plastic waste emitted to the ocean118Ranked 86th· 2019
- Plastic waste emitted to the ocean per capita0.02Ranked 75th· 2019
- Plastic waste generation206,322.2Ranked 118th· 2020
- Plastic waste generation (tonnes, total)87,636Ranked 110th· 2010
- PM2.5 air pollution, mean annual exposure (micrograms per cubic meter)22.4Ranked 131st▼ 2· 2023
- PM2.5 air pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO guideline value (% of total)100Ranked 77th▲ 1· 2017
- PM2.5 exposure22.4Ranked 70th▲ 2· 2023
- PM2.5 pollution (mean annual exposure)22.4Ranked 131st▼ 2· 2023
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-1 value (% of total)29.7Ranked 40th▲ 1· 2017
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-2 value (% of total)89.1Ranked 63rd—· 2017
- PM2.5 pollution, population exposed to levels exceeding WHO Interim Target-3 value (% of total)100Ranked 87th▲ 21· 2017
- Population density (people per sq. km of land area)857.4Ranked 12th—· 2023
- Population in largest city823,407Ranked 131st—· 2025
- Population in the largest city (% of urban population)17.4Ranked 123rd—· 2025
- Population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.21Ranked 167th—· 2015
- Population living in slums (% of urban population)19.5Ranked 65th▼ 2· 2020
- Primary school99.1%Ranked 3rd▼ 2· 2023
- Probability of mismanaged plastic waste reaching the ocean via rivers9.3%Ranked 5th· 2019
- Proportion of degraded mountain land (%)10.5Ranked 11th—· 2021
- Proportion of degraded mountain land (%) - Total10.5%Ranked 11th▼ 7· 2021
- Proportion of hazardous waste treated or disposed (%)100Ranked 7th▲ 1· 2014
- Proportion of land that is degraded over total land area (%)26Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2019
- Proportion of land that is degraded over total land area (%)26%Ranked 24th▼ 2· 2019
- Proportion of municipal waste recycled (%)6Ranked 45th▼ 4· 2021
- Proportion of population practicing open defecation, by urban/rural (%)0.13Ranked 84th▼ 3· 2024
- Proportion of population using safely managed drinking water services, by urban/rural (%)80.6Ranked 66th▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of population using safely managed sanitation services, by urban/rural (%)73.5Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2024
- Proportion of population with basic handwashing facilities on premises, by urban/rural (%)94.9Ranked 14th▲ 1· 2024
- Proportion of primary schools with access to basic drinking water99.1%Ranked 4th▼ 1· 2023
- Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)71.5Ranked 49th▼ 13· 2024
- Proportion of safely treated domestic wastewater flows (%)71.5%Ranked 49th▼ 11· 2024
- Proportion of transboundary river and lake basins with an operational arrangement for water cooperation (%)0Ranked 61st· 2023
- Proportion of wastewater treated, by activity and location (%)52.2Ranked 47th· 2022
- Recipient countries of global funding with access to any funding from global financial mechanisms for projects related to invasive alien species management (1 = YES, 0 = NO)0Ranked 2nd—· 2022
- Recycling0Ranked 54th▲ 3· 2014
- Red List Index0.9Ranked 10th—· 2024
- Red List Index0.83Ranked 132nd▲ 1· 2025
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)164.9Ranked 167th—· 2021
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)164.9Ranked 167th—· 2021
- Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita (cubic meters)164.9Ranked 167th—· 2021
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)0.81Ranked 151st—· 2021
- Renewable internal freshwater resources, total (billion cubic meters)0.81Ranked 151st—· 2021
- Rural population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.01Ranked 170th▲ 2· 2015
- Safely managed80.6%Ranked 66th▲ 1· 2024
- Settlements and infrastructure0.33Ranked 161st▼ 2· 2024
- share_global_excess_nitrogen0.03%Ranked 93rd· 2009
- share_global_excess_phosphorous0.04%Ranked 93rd· 2009
- Share of firms that were asked to pay a bribe to get a water connection4.6%Ranked 17th▼ 7· 2023
- Share of global forest area0%Ranked 183rd—· 2025
- Share of global mismanaged plastic waste0%Ranked 116th· 2019
- Share of global plastic waste emitted to the ocean0.01%Ranked 86th· 2019
- Share of global plastic waste exports0%Ranked 124th▼ 8· 2019
- Share of global plastic waste imports0%Ranked 100th▲ 21· 2023
- Share of land covered by forest1.8%Ranked 189th—· 2025
- Share of the population not using improved drinking water sources0%Ranked 156th▼ 3· 2024
- Share of the population using an improved drinking water source100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of the population using at least a basic drinking water source98.8%Ranked 46th—· 2024
- Share of the population using safely managed drinking water80.6%Ranked 66th▲ 1· 2024
- Share of the rural population using at least a basic drinking water source100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Share of the urban population using at least a basic drinking water source98.4%Ranked 50th—· 2024
- Share of total municipal solid waste collected92.2%Ranked 28th· 2020
- Share of urban population98.4%Ranked 50th—· 2024
- Sharks & Rays0Ranked 15th· 2025
- Surface water0Ranked 80th▼ 5· 2024
- Surface water0Ranked 94th▼ 3· 2024
- Surface water0Ranked 102nd▼ 5· 2024
- Terrain Ruggedness Index 100m (Nunn and Puga 2012)277.5Ranked 22nd· 1996
- Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area)10%Ranked 120th▲ 2· 2025
- Threatened endemic bird species0Ranked 27th· 2025
- Threatened endemic mammal species0Ranked 27th· 2025
- Threatened endemic reef-forming coral species0Ranked 5th· 2025
- Total0.72Ranked 174th▼ 2· 2024
- total_deforestation0.13Ranked 154th▼ 7· 2020
- Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)45MRanked 45th▼ 6· 2023
- Total official development assistance for biodiversity, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)77.2Ranked 28th▼ 14· 2024
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for water supply and sanitation, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2023 United States dollars)144.06MRanked 16th▼ 1· 2023
- Total official development assistance (gross disbursement) for water supply and sanitation, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)142.4Ranked 18th▲ 2· 2024
- Total plastic pollution28,427.5Ranked 115th· 2020
- Total plastic pollution per capita5.7Ranked 91st· 2020
- Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) transferring plant genetic resources for food and agriculture to the country (number)21Ranked 123rd▼ 8· 2025
- Total waste generation, by activity (Tonnes)2MRanked 18th▼ 30· 2021
- Total wastewater generated (million m3/year)138Ranked 61st· 2022
- Total wastewater treated (million m3/year)72Ranked 73rd· 2022
- Total water withdrawal per capita111.3Ranked 94th▼ 11· 2005
- Trade-adjusted deforestation per person3.1Ranked 100th▼ 1· 2023
- Unknown gear2,780.5Ranked 56th▲ 3· 2018
- Urban81.9%Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Urban population81.9%Ranked 31st—· 2024
- Urban population living in areas where elevation is below 5 meters (% of total population)0.19Ranked 163rd—· 2015
- Urban usage100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Using improved drinking water soures100%Ranked 1st—· 2024
- Water productivity, total (constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal)44.9Ranked 69th▼ 2· 2021
- Water productivity, total (constant 2015 US$ GDP per cubic meter of total freshwater withdrawal)44.9Ranked 69th▼ 2· 2021
- Water Use Efficiency (United States dollars per cubic meter)30.2Ranked 63rd▼ 3· 2023
- Wildfire0.26Ranked 137th▼ 1· 2018
- Wild fish catch from bottom trawling83.7Ranked 95th—· 2018
- Yearly burned area across all land types429.3Ranked 138th▲ 2· 2024
- Yearly burned area in other land types0Ranked 71st▼ 7· 2024
- Yearly burned area in shrublands and grasslands107.3Ranked 129th—· 2024
- Yield gap versus nitrogen pollution effect-103%Ranked 3rd· 2020
other
Actual Progress
10 Mbits/s and over
- 10 Mbits/s and over368,646Ranked 86th▼ 3· 2023
- Any speed8.4Ranked 100th▼ 20· 2023
- AS numbers delegated67Ranked 93rd· 2026
- Both accounts1.9%Ranked 62nd· 2021
- Both sexes5.1%Ranked 31st· 2019
- Developers112,567Ranked 97th▲ 2· 2026
- Female phone ownership (%)77.4%Ranked 27th—· 2023
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Business enterprise35.6Ranked 10th· 2008
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Government24.8Ranked 69th▲ 21· 2013
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Higher education19.8Ranked 71st▲ 12· 2013
- Female researchers as a percentage of total researchers (HC) - Private non-profit28.2Ranked 39th▲ 33· 2013
- Female share of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) programmes, tertiary (%)44.3Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2018
- Firms that introduced a new product/service and process, and spent on R&D0.67Ranked 33rd▲ 8· 2023
- Fixed broadband subscriptions448,515Ranked 96th—· 2024
- Fixed broadband subscriptions448,515Ranked 96th—· 2024
- Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people)8.2Ranked 101st▼ 4· 2024
- Fixed telephone subscriptions383,653Ranked 91st—· 2023
- Fixed telephone subscriptions383,653Ranked 91st—· 2023
- Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people)7.1Ranked 101st▼ 21· 2023
- Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people)7.1Ranked 101st▼ 21· 2023
- GERD as a percentage of GDP0.45Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2013
- Git pushes165,725Ranked 98th▲ 1· 2026
- Individuals using the Internet, female (% of female population)86.3Ranked 37th▲ 7· 2023
- Individuals using the Internet, male (% of male population)87Ranked 40th▲ 14· 2023
- Interconnection facilities3Ranked 54th· 2026
- Internet exchange points2Ranked 30th· 2026
- IPv4 addresses delegated876,032Ranked 94th· 2026
- IPv6 prefixes delegated46Ranked 88th· 2026
- Landline phone subscriptions383,653Ranked 91st—· 2023
- Landline phone subscriptions7.1Ranked 101st▼ 21· 2023
- Male8.3%Ranked 33rd· 2019
- Mobile76.7Ranked 144th▼ 25· 2023
- Mobile cellular subscriptions4.15MRanked 122nd▼ 10· 2023
- Mobile cellular subscriptions4.15MRanked 122nd▼ 10· 2023
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)76.7Ranked 144th▼ 25· 2023
- Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people)76.7Ranked 144th▼ 25· 2023
- Number of Internet users3.86MRanked 99th▼ 1· 2020
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 90th▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, both sexes (%)81.8%Ranked 22nd▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, female (%)86.3%Ranked 44th▲ 6· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from programmes other than Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics in tertiary education, male (%)73.9%Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.53Ranked 16th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, both sexes (%)18.2%Ranked 77th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, female (%)13.7%Ranked 51st—· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education, male (%)26.1%Ranked 84th▲ 3· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics programmes in tertiary education who are female (%)48.4%Ranked 8th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.52Ranked 10th▼ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, both sexes (%)6.5%Ranked 32nd▼ 19· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, female (%)4.9%Ranked 16th▼ 8· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Information and Communication Technologies programmes, male (%)9.3%Ranked 52nd▼ 11· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.6Ranked 5th▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, both sexes (%)2.9%Ranked 73rd▲ 7· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, female (%)3.7%Ranked 61st▲ 12· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Statistics programmes, male (%)1.6%Ranked 93rd▲ 4· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.2Ranked 72nd—· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, both sexes (%)5.4%Ranked 78th▲ 5· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, female (%)5.9%Ranked 80th▲ 2· 2023
- Percentage of graduates from tertiary education graduating from Social Sciences, Journalism and Information programmes, male (%)4.7%Ranked 66th▲ 7· 2023
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 2G mobile network (%)98Ranked 34th—· 2023
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 3G mobile network (%)58Ranked 89th▲ 13· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 4G mobile network (%)0Ranked 109th▲ 22· 2024
- Proportion of population covered by at least a 5G mobile network (%)0Ranked 57th▲ 2· 2022
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1.1Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, both sexes (%)9%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, female (%)9.3%Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 15-24 years old, male (%)8.7%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.48Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, both sexes (%)7.1%Ranked 15th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, female (%)4.6%Ranked 15th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 25-74 years old, male (%)9.6%Ranked 13th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 75 years old or over, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.31Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 75 years old or over, both sexes (%)0.8%Ranked 3rd· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 75 years old or over, female (%)0.4%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, 75 years old or over, male (%)1.3%Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.68Ranked 15th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.54Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, both sexes (%)6.8%Ranked 26th▼ 4· 2023
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, female (%)5.7%Ranked 17th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, female, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.71Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, male (%)8.4%Ranked 19th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, male, adjusted location parity index (LPIA)0.43Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)1Ranked 4th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, both sexes (%)4.1%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, female (%)4.2%Ranked 11th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, rural, male (%)4%Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.8Ranked 8th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, both sexes (%)4.2%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, female (%)3.7%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, under 15 years old, male (%)4.6%Ranked 9th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)0.64Ranked 12th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, both sexes (%)7.6%Ranked 15th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, female (%)5.9%Ranked 14th· 2019
- Proportion of youth and adults that connected and installed new devices (e.g. a modem, camera, printer) through wired or wireless technologies, urban, male (%)9.2%Ranked 16th· 2019
- Repositories244,383Ranked 93rd—· 2026
- Research and development expenditure as a proportion of GDP (%)0.45Ranked 57th▼ 7· 2013
- Researchers (FTE) - % Female33.6Ranked 28th· 2007
- Researchers (HC) - % Female22.6Ranked 77th▲ 12· 2013
- Researchers (in full-time equivalent) per million inhabitants (per 1,000,000 population)584.4Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2013
- Researchers in R&D (per million people)584.4Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2013
- Researchers per million inhabitants (FTE)584.4Ranked 56th▼ 3· 2013
- Scientific and technical journal articles861.7Ranked 88th▼ 1· 2023
- Scientific and technical journal articles per million people166.8Ranked 85th▼ 7· 2023
- Secure Internet servers2,259Ranked 111th▲ 4· 2024
- Secure Internet servers (per 1 million people)427.1Ranked 134th▲ 6· 2024
- Share of people aged 15+ using a mobile money account2.3%Ranked 63rd· 2021
- Share with a mobile money account2.3%Ranked 63rd· 2021
- Total official flows for infrastructure, by recipient countries (millions of constant 2024 United States dollars)77Ranked 91st▲ 13· 2024
Agricultural raw materials exports (% of merchandise exports)
- Agricultural raw materials exports (% of merchandise exports)0.76Ranked 86th▼ 11· 2023
- Agricultural raw materials imports (% of merchandise imports)0.47Ranked 132nd▲ 3· 2023
- All products2.2%Ranked 72nd▼ 32· 2017
- Annual growth of exports of goods and services (%)5.7%Ranked 42nd▼ 60· 2023
- Annual growth of imports of goods and services (%)3%Ranked 51st▲ 25· 2023
- Average time to clear imports through customs (days)14.2Ranked 15th▲ 11· 2023
- China’s rank among import partners1Ranked 12th▼ 2· 2024
- Commercial service exports (current US$)558.7MRanked 84th▼ 50· 2025
- Commercial service imports (current US$)1.23BRanked 82nd▼ 48· 2025
- Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service exports)64.7Ranked 13th—· 2025
- Computer, communications and other services (% of commercial service imports)8.6Ranked 95th▼ 11· 2025
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global merchandise exports (%)0.01%Ranked 65th▼ 4· 2023
- Developing countries’ and least developed countries’ share of global services exports (%)0.01%Ranked 64th—· 2022
- Difference in the value of goods exported to and imported by the US (DOTS (2017))-4.04MRanked 169th· 2016
- Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$)2.65BRanked 114th▼ 14· 2025
- Export unit value index (2015 = 100)129.1Ranked 110th▼ 3· 2024
- Export value index (2015 = 100)156.9Ranked 84th▲ 8· 2024
- Export volume index (2015 = 100)121.5Ranked 77th▲ 4· 2024
- Firms exporting directly at least 10% of sales (% of firms)12.3Ranked 17th—· 2023
- Food exports (% of merchandise exports)21.4Ranked 61st▼ 3· 2023
- Food imports (% of merchandise imports)30.9Ranked 5th▼ 2· 2023
- Fuel exports (% of merchandise exports)0.09Ranked 129th▼ 4· 2023
- Fuel imports (% of merchandise imports)21.2Ranked 40th▲ 9· 2023
- Goods3.01BRanked 79th▼ 46· 2025
- High-technology exports (current US$)17.76MRanked 108th▼ 10· 2023
- ICT goods exports (% of total goods exports)0.87Ranked 67th▼ 9· 2023
- ICT goods imports (% total goods imports)3.3Ranked 93rd▼ 5· 2023
- Imports from China as a share of total imports18%Ranked 82nd▲ 16· 2024
- Imports of goods and services6.57BRanked 105th▼ 16· 2025
- Imports of goods from North America480MRanked 116th▼ 40· 2024
- Imports of goods from North America480MRanked 116th▼ 40· 2024
- Imports of pandemic-related customs (per-capita)1.4Ranked 119th▲ 11· 2021
- Import unit value index (2015 = 100)158.5Ranked 9th▲ 2· 2024
- Import value index (2015 = 100)129.9Ranked 139th▲ 67· 2024
- Import volume index (2015 = 100)82Ranked 162nd▲ 29· 2024
- Insurance and financial services (% of commercial service exports)0.01Ranked 167th▼ 5· 2022
- Insurance and financial services (% of commercial service imports)6Ranked 58th▼ 36· 2025
- Manufactures exports (% of merchandise exports)63.3%Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Manufactures exports (% of merchandise exports)63.3Ranked 51st▲ 2· 2023
- Manufactures imports (% of merchandise imports)45.9Ranked 150th▼ 2· 2023
- Medium and high-tech exports (% manufactured exports)12.4Ranked 113th▲ 7· 2022
- Merchandise exports by the reporting economy (current US$)1.52BRanked 144th▼ 2· 2023
- Merchandise exports by the reporting economy, residual (% of total merchandise exports)0Ranked 123rd—· 2023
- Merchandise exports to economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise exports)10.4Ranked 33rd▲ 3· 2023
- Merchandise exports to high-income economies (% of total merchandise exports)90.7Ranked 20th▲ 5· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise exports)0.37Ranked 188th—· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise exports)1.5Ranked 79th▼ 17· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise exports)0.03Ranked 166th▼ 4· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Middle East & North Africa (% of total merchandise exports)7.3Ranked 17th▼ 2· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise exports)0.09Ranked 175th—· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise exports)0.03Ranked 185th▲ 3· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies outside region (% of total merchandise exports)2Ranked 175th▼ 6· 2023
- Merchandise exports to low- and middle-income economies within region (% of total merchandise exports)7.3Ranked 131st▼ 8· 2023
- Merchandise exports, total (all partners)1.52BRanked 128th▼ 3· 2023
- Merchandise imports by the reporting economy (current US$)6.68BRanked 127th▲ 12· 2023
- Merchandise imports by the reporting economy, residual (% of total merchandise imports)0Ranked 112th▲ 30· 2023
- Merchandise imports from economies in the Arab World (% of total merchandise imports)11Ranked 41st▼ 3· 2023
- Merchandise imports from high-income economies (% of total merchandise imports)71.8Ranked 60th▼ 1· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in East Asia & Pacific (% of total merchandise imports)9.5Ranked 155th▼ 9· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Europe & Central Asia (% of total merchandise imports)7.6Ranked 35th▲ 6· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Latin America & the Caribbean (% of total merchandise imports)1.1Ranked 131st▼ 5· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Middle East & North Africa (% of total merchandise imports)8Ranked 7th▼ 1· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in South Asia (% of total merchandise imports)1.8Ranked 116th▼ 5· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa (% of total merchandise imports)0.24Ranked 137th▼ 4· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies outside region (% of total merchandise imports)20.1Ranked 106th▲ 13· 2023
- Merchandise imports from low- and middle-income economies within region (% of total merchandise imports)8Ranked 132nd▼ 3· 2023
- Merchandise imports, total (all partners)8.27BRanked 112th▲ 5· 2023
- Ores and metals exports (% of merchandise exports)14.4Ranked 32nd▲ 1· 2023
- Ores and metals imports (% of merchandise imports)1.5Ranked 81st▲ 4· 2023
- Proportion of tariff lines applied to imports with zero-tariff (%) - Total or no breakdown86.2%Ranked 12th▲ 2· 2023
- Share of services in total goods and services exports16.8%Ranked 72nd▼ 39· 2025
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products (%)1.9Ranked 89th▼ 12· 2017
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, manufactured products (%)1.4Ranked 90th▼ 8· 2017
- Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%)5.6Ranked 64th▼ 32· 2017
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)2.2%Ranked 72nd▼ 32· 2017
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)2.2Ranked 72nd▼ 32· 2017
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products (%)1.5Ranked 75th▼ 28· 2017
- Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%)3.8Ranked 59th▼ 47· 2017
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, all products (%)4.8Ranked 73rd▼ 16· 2017
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, manufactured products (%)3.6Ranked 70th▼ 15· 2017
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, simple mean, primary products (%)8.3Ranked 54th▼ 14· 2017
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, all products (%)4.9Ranked 75th▼ 1· 2017
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, manufactured products (%)3.6Ranked 80th▼ 14· 2017
- Tariff rate, most favored nation, weighted mean, primary products (%)8Ranked 59th▲ 5· 2017
- Transport services (% of commercial service exports)2.4Ranked 94th▼ 62· 2025
- Transport services (% of commercial service imports)47.1Ranked 12th▼ 35· 2025
- Travel services (% of commercial service exports)32.9Ranked 44th▼ 51· 2025
- Travel services (% of commercial service imports)38.3Ranked 15th▼ 51· 2025